overview of intense beam simulation experiments performed
TRANSCRIPT
Erik P. GilsonPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory
9th International Workshop on Nonneutral Plasmas Columbia University
June 17th, 2008
*This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Overview ofIntense Beam Simulation Experiments
Performed Using thePaul Trap Simulator Experiment (PTSX)*
In collaboration with:
Andy Carpe, Moses Chung, Ronald C. Davidson, Mikhail Dorf, Philip Efthimion, Andrew Godbehere, Richard Majeski, Hong Qin, Edward Startsev, Hua Wang
• Purpose: PTSX simulates, in a compact experiment, the transverse nonlinear dynamics of intense beam propagation over large distances through magnetic alternating-gradient transport systems.
• Applications: Accelerator systems for high energy and nuclear physics applications, heavy ion fusion, spallation neutron sources, and high energy density physics.
PTSX Simulates Nonlinear Beam Dynamicsin Magnetic Alternating-Gradient Systems
Other Intense-Beam Studies, Paul-trap-based and otherwise:
Okamoto and Tanaka
Drewsen et al.
Kishek et al.
Scientific Motivation
• Beam mismatch and envelope instabilities;
• Collective wave excitations;
• Chaotic particle dynamics and production of halo particles;
• Mechanisms for emittance growth;
• Compression techniques; and
• Effects of distribution function on stability properties.
As self-field effects become important, it is important to develop an understanding of:
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )yxqfoc
yxqfoc
q
yxz
xyzB
eexF
eexBˆˆ
ˆˆ
−−=
+′=
κ
2
)()(
cmzBZe
z qq βγ
κ′
≡
Magnetic Alternating-Gradient Transport Systems
SS
N
S
xz
y
Transverse Focusing Frequency andPhase Advance Characterize the Motion
In one lattice period, S, the smooth trajectory’s vacuum phase advance, σv, is 35 degrees.
Transverse focusing frequency, ωq
σv must be less than 180 for bounded orbits.
Space-charge decreases σv to σ.
2 m
0.4 m ))((21),,( 22 yxttyxe qap −′= κφ
20
)(8)(
wq rm
teVtπ
κ =′
0.2 m
PTSX Configuration – A Cylindrical Paul Trap
5x10-9 TorrPressure133 amuCesium ion mass105-106 cm-3Density< 10 VIon source grid voltages
< 100 kHz< 150 V~ 400 V
FrequencyEnd electrode voltageMaximum wall voltage
~ 1 cmPlasma radius10 cmWall radius2 mPlasma length
ξπ
ωf rm
eV
wq 2
max 08=
sinusoidal in this work
22
1π
ξ =
3423 ηη
ξ−
=
for a sinusoidal waveform V(t).
for a periodic step function waveform V(t) with fill factor η.
Pure Ion Plasma
0 max2
qsfv
Vf fω
σ = ∝
Transverse Dynamics are the Same Including Self-Field Effects
))((21),,( 22 yxttyxe qap −′= κφ
20
)(8)(
wq rm
teVtπ
κ =′
( ) ( ) ( )yxqfoc
q xyzB eexB ˆˆ +′=
( ) ( ) ( )yxqfoc yxz eexF ˆˆ −−= κ
2
)()(
cmzBZe
z qq βγ
κ′
=
[ ]),,(),,(22 syxAsyxcm
Zezβφ
βγψ −=
( ) ( ) 0=⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
′∂∂
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛∂∂
+−−′∂
∂⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
∂∂
+−∂∂′+
∂∂′+
∂∂
bqq fyy
ysxx
xsy
yx
xs
ψκψκ
∫ ′′−=⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛∂∂
+∂∂
bfydxdN
Kyx
πψ 22
2
2
2
Quadrupolar Focusing
Self-Forces usual φself(x,y,t)
Field Equations Poisson’s Equation
Vlasov Equation
Transverse Dynamics are the Same Including Self-Field Effects
•Long coasting beams
•Beam radius << lattice period
•Motion in beam frame is nonrelativistic
Ions in PTSX have the same transverse equations of motion as ions in an alternating-gradient system in the beam frame.
If…
Then, when in the beam frame, both systems have…
•Quadrupolar external forces
•Self-forces governed by a Poisson-like equation
•Distributions evolve according to nonlinear Vlasov-Maxwell equation
Smooth-Focusing Equilibria areParameterized by s
( ) ( ) ( )⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡ +−=
kTrqrm
nrns
q
22
exp022 φω
( )0
1 s qn rr
r r rφ
ε∂ ∂
=∂ ∂
In thermal equilibrium,
Poisson’s equation becomes a nonlinear equation for φs that must be solved numerically.
s = 0…0.9
s = 0.99
s = 0.9999 s = 1
)()0( 2 sRnN ζπ=
ζ(s) is determined numerically.ζ(0) = 1ζ(1) = 2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
ξ
s
2
2
(0)1
2p
q
sωω
≡ <
Normalized intensity parameter s.
s ~ 0.2 for SNS and Tevatron injector.
s ~ 0.99 for HIF
Global Force Balance
22 2 2
4qo
Nqm R kTωπε
= +
If p = n kT, then the statement of local force balance on a fluid element can be manipulated to give a global force balance equation.
2p qF mn rω= −
pressureF kT n= − ∇EF nqE=
2 2
0q
nr dr mn r qnE kTr
ω∞ ∂⎛ ⎞= −⎜ ⎟∂⎝ ⎠∫
2q
nmn r qnE kTr
ω ∂= −
∂Fluid Element
where R is the root-mean-squared radius and N is the line charge.
Note that N and R are measured by integrating the experimentally obtained density profiles n(r).
kT is inferred from this global force balance.
1.25 in
Electrodes, Ion Source, and Collector
5 mm
Broad flexibility in applying V(t) to electrodes with arbitrary function generator.
Increasing source current creates plasmas with intense space-charge.
Large dynamic range using sensitive electrometer.
Measures average Q(r).
• s = ωp2/2ωq
2
= 0.18.
• V0 = 235 V f = 75 kHz σv = 49o
• At f = 75 kHz, a lifetime of 100 ms corresponds to 7,500 lattice periods.
• If S is 1 m, the PTSX simulation experiment would correspond to a 7.5 km beamline.
PTSX Simulates Equivalent PropagationDistances of 7.5 km
0.00E+00
5.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.50E-02
2.00E-02
2.50E-02
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000 50 100 150 200 250 300
1
0
2
r
Temporary Amplitude Changes Cause Mismatch Oscillations that Heat the Plasma
0.00E+00
5.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.50E-02
2.00E-02
2.50E-02
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
r
ΔR
due to emittance growth
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
1
0
2
Voltage Waveform Amplitude
WARP 2D
WARP 2D
WARP 2DExp. Data: 30 % Increase
WARP 2DExp. Data: 50 % Increase
Experimental Data
oq
NqkTRmπε
ω4
22
22 +=
5 Cycles
Transverse Bunch Compression by Increasing ωq
oq
NqkTRmπε
ω4
22
22 +=
If line density N is constant and kT doesn’t change too much, then increasing ωq decreases R, and the bunch is compressed.
ξπ
ωf rm
eV
wq 2
max 08=
Either1.) increasing V0 max (increasing magnetic field strength) or 2.) decreasing f (increasing the magnet spacing)increases ωq
ωq 1.5 ωq
Compression is Possible but Increasing Phase Advance Degrades Transverse Confinement
s = 0.08, kT = 1.6 eV
s = 0.14, kT = 1.4 eV
s = 0.02, kT = 4.7 eV
ωq 1.5 ωq
σv = 50o 60%
σv = 75o 40%
σv = 112o 450%
N ~ constant Emittance increases
oq
NqkTRmπε
ω4
22
22 += 0 maxq
Vf
ω ∝ 0 max2
sfv
Vf
σ ∝
Adiabatic Amplitude Increases Transversely Compress the Bunch Better
R = 0.79 cmkT = 0.16 eVs = 0.18Δε = 10%
InstantaneousR = 0.93 cmkT = 0.58 eVs = 0.08Δε = 140%
AdiabaticR = 0.63 cmkT = 0.26 eVs = 0.10Δε = 10%
• s = ωp2/2ωq
2 = 0.20 • ν/ν0 = 0.88 • V0 max = 150 V • f = 60 kHz • σv = 49o
20% increase in V0 max 90% increase in V0 max
σv = 63o σv = 111o
ε ~R√ kT
BaselineR = 0.83 cmkT = 0.12 eVs = 0.20
Less Than Four Lattice Periods are Needed to Make the Transition Adiabatic
σv = 63o
σv = 111o
σv = 81o
• s = ωp2/2ωq
2 = 0.20 • ν/ν0 = 0.88 • V0 max = 150 V • f = 60 kHz • σv = 49o
WARP 2D simulations are in good agreement.
Time (ms)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
phas
e (r
ad)
0
50
100
150
200
Time (ms)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
phas
e (r
ad)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Time (ms)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
kHz
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
Time (ms)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Am
plitu
de (a
rb)
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Time (ms)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Am
plitu
de (a
rb)
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
( )⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+
−−−+= 1
2tanh
22)( 21
τπφ tt
tff
tft fif
( )0
21
2coshln
422)( f
ttfft
fft iffi −⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡ −−−+
+=
ττ
πφ
πφ2
)(t
πφ2
)(t
( ) ( )tVtV φsinmax 0=
Increasing ωq by Adiabatically Decreasing f
( ) ( )tVtV φsinmax 0=ξ
πω
f rmeV
wq 2
max 08=
Adiabatically Decreasing fCompresses the Bunch
33% decrease in f
Good agreement with KV-equivalent beam envelope solutions.
ξπ
ωf rm
eV
wq 2
max 08=
• s = ωp2/2ωq
2
= 0.2.
• ν/ν0 = 0.88• V0 max = 150 V
f = 60 kHz σv = 49o
Transverse Confinement is Lost When Single-Particle Orbits are Unstable
τc
2
1qsfv f f
ωσ = ∝
τ = τc
( )⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+
−−−+= 1
2tanh
22)( 21
τπφ tt
tff
tft fif
πφ2
)(t
Measured τc (dots)Set σv max = 180o and solve for τc (line)
τ cf 0
f1 (kHz)
f0 = 60 kHzf0 = 60 kHz
Good Agreement Between Data and KV-Equivalent Beam Envelope Solutions
τc
τf0 = 0
τf0 = 19.9
τ = τc
τf0 = 26
f0 = 60 kHz
Spectrum of measured signal
Quadrupole mode
Breathing mode
ℓ = 2 surface-wave quadrupole mode
ℓ = 0 body-wave breathing mode
( )1 24 3q sω ω= −
( )1 24 2q sω ω= −
Measuring Beam Oscillations and Inferring Beam “Normalized Intensity” s
Segmented collective-mode capacitive pick-up diagnostic is sensitive to beam collective-mode oscillations.
Measured frequencies…
… determine unique “normalized intensity.”
Other modes?
• PTSX is a versatile research facility in which to simulate collective processes and the transverse dynamics of intense charged particle beam propagation over large distances through an alternating-gradient magnetic quadrupole focusing system using a compact laboratory Paul trap.
• PTSX explores important beam physics issues such as:
•Beam mismatch and envelope instabilities;
•Collective wave excitations;
•Chaotic particle dynamics and production of halo particles;
•Mechanisms for emittance growth;
•Compression techniques; and
•Effects of distribution function on stability properties.
PTSX is a Compact Experiment for Studying the Propagation of Beams Over Large Distances