overview of growth, public investments, and future challenges for achieving mdg and caadp goals_2010
Upload: african-regional-strategic-analysis-and-knowledge-support-system-resakss
Post on 18-Nov-2014
484 views
DESCRIPTION
"Overview of growth, public investments, and future challenges for achieving MDG and CAADP goals", presentation by Shenggen Fan at the USAID, IFPRI Financial Gap Analysis Workshop held at the World Bank, January 7, 2010.TRANSCRIPT
IFPRI
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Overview of growth, public investments,
and future challenges for achieving
MDG and CAADP goals
Shenggen Fan
International Food Policy Research Institute
USAID/World Bank Workshop on
“Agricultural investment priorities and financing gaps for achieving growth and
poverty reduction targets: Review of evidence and methodology”
January 7, 2010
IFPRI
Global Initiatives
G8, G20 and other global initiatives increased
attention and financial commitments for agriculture
as a tool for development:
» L’Aquila G8 Statement on Global Food Security: “We support
the implementation of country and regional agricultural
strategies through country-led coordination processes….
Investment in and access to education, research, science and
technologies should be substantially strengthened at national,
regional and international levels.”
Need for credible commitments to support long term
“agriculture for development” agenda, beyond price
and political cycles
However, capacity is often weak at the regional and
country level
IFPRI
Outline
Why is Agriculture Important?
Current Trends: Public Spending and
Growth
Results from Modeling Work: Are
current targets enough?
Setting Priorities
Why is Agriculture Important?
Source: Ravallion et al. (2007)
Note: Poverty line is set at $1.08/day
Poverty Remains Largely Rural
Despite recent urbanization trends, majority of the world’s poor will
continue to live in rural areas for many decades to come
Link Between Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction
Poverty Reduction Elasticities of Agricultural Growth
SSA -1.83
South Asia -1.73
East Asia and Pacific -1.44
Eastern and Central Europe -1.57
Latin America -1.11
Middle East and North Africa -0.92
All Low Income Countries -1.6
Poverty Reduction Effect of Agriculture vs. Non-agriculture Led
Growth Strategies
Ethiopia Ghana Rwanda Uganda Zambia
Agriculture-led GDP
growth-1.7 -1.8 -1.4 -1.6 -0.6
Non Agriculture-led
GDP growth-0.7 -1.3 -0.8 -1.1 -0.4
Source: Johnson et al, 2009
Source: Christiaensen et al, 2006
IFPRI
Agricultural Growth is Key for Poverty Reduction
SSA
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Po
verty rates (%
)
Actual trend
MDG target trendLast off icial
estimate
SSA
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Po
verty rates (%
)
Actual trend
MDG target trendLast off icial
estimate
Business as usual Focus on agricultural growth
IFPRI
Ethiopia: 5% of GDP annual growth in both cases
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Ghana: 6% of GDP annual growth in both cases
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Rwanda: 6% of GDP annual growth in both cases
34
37
40
43
46
49
52
55
58
61
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Ag-led growth Nag-led growth
Uganda: 7% of GDP annual growth in both cases
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
1999 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
Ag-led growth Nag-led growth
Agricultural Growth is More Pro-Poor
Sector
Ghana Uganda Tanzania Ethiopia China India Thailand
Returns to agriculture or rural income(local currency/local currency spending)
Agriculture 16.8 12.4 12.5 0.14 6.8 13.5 12.6Education -0.2 7.2 9.0 0.56 2.2 1.4 2.1Health 1.3 0.9 n.e. -0.03 n.e. 0.8 n.e.Roads 8.8 2.7 9.1 4.22 1.7 5.3 0.9
Ranking in returns to poverty reduction
Agriculture n.e. 1 2 n.e. 2 2 1Education n.e. 3 1 n.e. 1 3 3Health n.e. 4 n.e. n.e. n.e. 4 n.e.Roads n.e. 2 3 n.e. 3 1 2
Notes: “n.e.” indicates not estimated.
Public Investment Impact
Source: Mogues, Benin, and Fan (2008); Fan and Zhang(2004); Fan,
Hazell, and Thorat (2000); and, Fan, Yu, and Jitsuchon,(2008)
Need for a review of recent spending levels and priorities to identify
challenges and opportunities for improvement within developing countries
Current Trends: Agricultural Expenditures by Region
0
4
8
12
16
1980 1990 2000 2005
(%)
Share of AgGDP
SSA ASIA LAC TOTAL
0
50
100
150
200
250
1980 1990 2000 2005
20
00
In
tern
ati
on
al D
oll
ars
(b
illi
on
s)
2000 International Dollars
SSA ASIA LAC TOTAL
Source: ReSAKSS, calculated using data from International
Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Government Financial Statistics Yearbook
Uneven progress towards 6% annual
agricultural growth across SSA countries
-10
0
10
20
30
%
Annual Agricultural GDP Growth (%), 2007
CURRENT, 2008 (Unless otherwise noted)
CAADP 6% BENCHMARK
*=2007; **=2006; and ***=2005Source: World Bank (2009)
Uneven progress towards 10% budget allocation to agriculture across SSA countries
African continent as a whole has not met the 10% target (current spending at 6-8 percent)
Source: Omilola (2009)
Results from Modeling Work
Are Current Targets Enough?
0
5
10
15
20
25
Current and Required AgGDP Growth Rates to Meet Poverty MDG (%)
Annual AgGDP Growth Rates, 2000-2006
Required AgGDP Growth Rates to Meet MDG by 2015
Source: Johnson et al, 2009
Agriculture Financing Gaps to Meet MDG 1
Under current agricultural spending commitments
US$, constant 2007 (millions)US$, constant 2007 (millions)
Under CAADP-level agricultural spending (10% of total spending)
Source: Johnson et al, 2009
Agriculture Spending and Poverty Reduction
Number of people lifted out of poverty by 2015, under current
trends vs. after closing financing gap (millions)
Source: Johnson et al, 2009
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Nigeria
Congo, DR
Ethiopia
Tanzania
Kenya
Mozambique
Niger
Mali
Rwanda
Malawi
Zambia
Senegal
Liberia
Uganda
Ghana
Under Current Scenario
After Closing Financing Gap
IFPRI
Strengthening Global Efforts for Agricultural Development
Need to ensure that the political statements and
financial pledges in support of agricultural and rural
development are translated into actual actions and
development outcomes
Quantity plus Quality: Importance of coordination and
sustainability
Major Issues:
» How to track donor commitments and
disbursements?
» How to coordinate across donors?
IFPRI
Global Agricultural and Food Security Program (GAFSP)
Proposed multilateral mechanism to assist in the
implementation of donor pledges to scale-up agricultural and food
security assistance
Provides additional funds to fill financing gaps in support of
country-led agriculture and food security programs
Improves donor alignment around country programs by
channeling multiple donor funds through unified global
mechanism
Places emphasis on public and private investments that
» improve agricultural productivity
» link farmers to markets
» reduce risk and vulnerability
» improve non-farm rural livelihoods
» provide technical assistance and capacity building
IFPRI
Setting the Right Priorities
Returns to public spending vary drastically across
different types of investment and regions within the
same country
Agricultural research, education, and rural
infrastructure (especially low cost feeder roads) are
the three most effective public spending items in
promoting agricultural growth and poverty reduction
Evidence from China and Uganda indicates that it is
often low cost infrastructure that has highest return in
terms of growth and poverty reduction
IFPRI
Setting the Right Priorities
“One-size-fits-all” strategies do not work: different spending priorities are needed during different stages of development
» During the first phase, spending should focus on reducing widespread poverty through broad-based economic growth that reaches rural areas
» In subsequent phases, more direct attention should be focused on lagging sectors/regions in order to reduce poverty and income inequalities that arise and persist despite reforms
Reforms in institutions and governance related to
public spending
IFPRI
How to Approach Governance Reforms?
Need to strengthen capacity to use resources more
efficiently through governance reforms:
» Supply-side
Building administrative capacity via civil service reforms
Improving government procurement procedures and auditing
systems to root out corruption
» Demand-side
Strengthening governments’ accountability to citizens
through a system of checks and balances
Empower the participation of citizens and non-state actors
through greater decentralization
Institutional/governance reforms need to address
governance challenges at local, national, & global level
IFPRI
Governance Challenges
Global
» Failure of global institutions to predict and
coordinate past response to emergencies (e.g. food
& financial crises)
National
» Low capacity and will to use agriculture for
development
» Lack of mechanisms and skills for cross-sectoral
coordination
Local
» Low empowerment and capacity to set priorities and
implement policies
» Weak local accountability structures
IFPRI
Future Directions
Country and regional level capacity
building
Emerging issues, including:
» Climate change
» Financial crisis
» Emerging players like Brazil, China,
and India