overview of environmental scan findings. environmental scan – year 1 quantitative and qualitative...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of Environmental Scan
Findings
Environmental Scan – Year 1
•Quantitative and qualitative research methods: Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, Participant Observations, Document Reviews
•Participants: Residents, Family members, Physicians, PSWs, RNs, RPNs, Spiritual Care, Social Work, Recreation, Dietary, Housekeeping, Maintenance, Administration, Volunteers and Community Partners
Participants and Data Collection
• Surveys• All LTC home staff completed surveys
– Sample sizes across 4 homes are approximately:
• 205 PSWs• 69 Licensed Nurses• 79 Support Staff• 32 Administration• 39 Residents• 64 Family Members
Summary of Survey Results that All Staff Completed
FATCOD Survey(Frommelt Attitudes Toward the Care of Dying)
30-item scale designed to measure participants’ attitude toward providing care to dying people
Has no subscales
Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
15 items are scored positively and 15 negatively (lower scores consistent with PC philosophy)
Findings of the FATCOD Survey
Average scores across: 4.075
All four homes: 4.075 PSWs: 3.82 Licensed nurses: 4.21 Support Services: 3.89 Management: 4.16
On average, staff demonstrated a positive attitude about providing care for dying residents
QiAS (Quality in Action Scale)
43-item scale designed to measure aspects of work culture related to quality:
Six subscales: improvement orientation patient focus personal influence/performance management style mission and goals orientation team work orientation participants’ attitude toward providing care to dying people
Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)
Findings of the QiAS
Maple; n= 181 out of a possible 242 respondentsBirch; n= 135 out of a possible 202 respondentsElm; n= 52 out of a possible 135 respondentsPine; n = 55 out of a possible 104 respondents
Summary of PSW Survey Results
Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace (PEiW) Survey
PEiW is a 12-item scale that measures direct care workers’ sense of personal empowerment within their workplace
Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)
Four dimensions are measured: meaning competency self-determination impact
Findings of the PEiW Survey
Pine; n= 24 out of a possible 44 respondentsBirch; n= 72 out of a possible 102 respondentsMaple; n= 86 out of a possible 124 respondentsElm; n= 47 out of a possible 53 respondents
Supervisory Support Survey SSS is a 15-item scale that assesses aspects of
supervisory support
Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always)
Three dimensions are measured: empathy reliability nurturing connections
Findings of Supervisory Support Survey
Birch; n= 73 out of a possible 102 respondentsMaple; n= 86 out of a possible 124 respondentsPine; n= 24 out of a possible 44 respondentsElm; n= 31 out of a possible 53 respondents
Summary of Nurses Survey Results
Self-Efficacy in End-of-Life Care (S-E EOLC)
This 25-item survey measures confidence in the ability to provide palliative care
Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (Cannot do at all) to 7 (Certain can do)
Includes 3 subscales:patient management communicationmultidisciplinary teamwork
Findings of Self-Efficacy in End-of-Life Care Survey
Maple; n= 27 out of a possible 43 respondentsBirch; n= 22 out of a possible 42 respondentsElm; n= 11 out of a possible 16 respondentsPine; n= 8 out of a possible 18 respondents
Palliative Care Quiz (PCQ) The PCQ is a 20-item
scale that measures knowledge of palliative care nursing
It can be use to stimulate discussion of palliative care nursing and to identify misconceptions about the delivery of palliative care.
Findings of the Palliative Care Quiz Overall, nurses scored an average of
60.22 % on the PCQ. Scores for the individual homes are listed below:
Higher scores were achieved on questions related to use of pain medications
Birch average score = 63.4%Maple average score = 62.98%Elm average score = 62%Pine average score = 52.5%
Birch; n= 22 out of a possible 42 respondentsMaple; n= 27 out of a possible 43 respondentsElm; n= 12 out of a possible 16 respondentsPine; n= 8 out of a possible 18 respondents
Family and Resident Results
Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver
What is the QOLLTI-F survey?
The Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness – Family Caregiver Version (QOLLTI-F) survey assesses the quality of life of caregivers for people with life-threatening chronic or terminal health conditions.
There are five dimensions to this survey; – environment, – patient state, – own state, – outlook, – quality of care, – relationships and – financial worries.
QOLLTI-F
Maple; n= 15 respondentsBirch; n= 23 respondentsElm; n= 22 respondentsPine; n= 14 respondents
What is the MQoL survey?
The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL) was developed to measure five dimensions of quality of life which are: physical symptoms, physical well-being, psychological, existential and support.
What is quality of life? Quality of life is defined as an individual’s subjective
well-being.
McGill Quality of life Survey
MQOL
Maple; n= 5 residentsBirch; n= 2 residents, 17 proxies Elm; n= 1 resident, 6 proxyPine; n= 6 resident, 2 proxy
Group Discussion
What surprised you most/least about the results of the environmental scan?
What practices and strategies are you aware of that have been effective in providing palliative care in long-term care homes?
Acknowledgement
Funding Provided By:Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada
Thank you to our partners:
Contact Us
Visit our website:www.palliativealliance.ca
Email us:[email protected]
Call us:807-766-7228Thank You