overview of drug interactions between brecanavir (bcv) and other hiv protease inhibitors (pis) m...
DESCRIPTION
BCV Clinical Development Strategy (I) Resistance profile suggests BCV could be highly effective for treatment-experienced HIV patients For this population, dual RTV boosted PIs have been evaluated, but robust clinical data is sparse Negative interactions observed for dual RTV boosted PI regimens Tipranavir (TPV): lowered exposure other PI APV/Kaletra: lowered exposure to both PIsTRANSCRIPT
Overview of Drug Interactions Between Brecanavir (BCV) and
Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs)
M Shelton, S Ford, M Anderson, S Murray, J Ng-Cashin
XVI International AIDS Conference, Toronto, Canada, 13-18 August 2006, Abstract TUAB0105
640385 (Brecanavir*, BCV)
• Potent new protease inhibitor• Median IC50 in PBMCs = 0.03 nM
• Range (0.02-0.10 nM)
• Substrate for CYP450 3A4 and p-gp• Bioavailability significantly increased with
RTV 100mg and meals• No significant pharmacokinetic interaction
with TFV, ZDV or 3TC• Generally well tolerated• Currently in Phase II development
*USAN Approved Only
BCV Clinical Development Strategy (I)
• Resistance profile suggests BCV could be highly effective for treatment-experienced HIV patients
• For this population, dual RTV boosted PIs have been evaluated, but robust clinical data is sparse
• Negative interactions observed for dual RTV boosted PI regimens• Tipranavir (TPV): lowered exposure other PI• APV/Kaletra: lowered exposure to both PIs
BCV Clinical Development Strategy (II)• PI interaction studies in healthy subjects
• First drug interactions with CYP substrates
• 3 separate studies were planned:• 1st Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) – HPR10004*• 2nd Atazanavir (ATV) – HPR10009*• 3rd Tipranavir (TPV) – HPR103377
* Ford S, et al. 7th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy, Lisbon, Portugal, 20 – 22 April, 2006 (posters 51 and 76)
BCV PI Drug Interaction Studies• Different strategies:
• LPV/r and ATV – hypothesis testing• evaluate combination relative to boosted PI
• TPV – estimation approach• confirm anticipated TPV effects on BCV PK• evaluate higher RTV dose (200mg)
• Different BCV doses (during dose ranging): • LPV/r and ATV - BCV 300mg /RTV 100mg BID• TPV - BCV 600mg /RTV 100mg BID
Study Design for LPV/r & ATV StudiesArm Sample Size Period 1
Days 1-14
Washout 21-28 Days
Period 2 Days 1-14
A 12 PI BCV/r + PIB 12 BCV/r + PI PIC 12 BCV/r BCV/r + PI
D 12 BCV/r + PI BCV/r
Study Design for TPV StudyArm Sample Size Period 1
Days 1-10Period 2 Days 1-10
A 12 BCV/r BCV/r + PI
B 12 BCV/r BCV + RTV 200mg
BCV 300mg
BCV 600mg
Protease Inhibitor PK Comparisons
Drug n
GLS Mean Ratio (90% CI)
AUC(ngh/mL)
Cmax(ng/mL)
C(ng/mL)
LPV/r 23 1.02(0.94, 1.11)
1.01(0.94, 1.08)
1.08(0.94, 1.24)
ATV 16 1.44(1.32, 1.58)
1.21(1.12, 1.30)
2.11(1.81, 2.45)
TPV PK was not evaluated due to premature discontinuation prior to attainment of steady-state conditions for TPV
ATV/r = 300mg/100mg q24hBCV/r + ATV = 300mg/100mg q12h + 300mg q24h
ATV Increased by Addition of BCV to ATV/r
BCV PK Comparisons
Drug nGLS Mean Ratio (90% CI)
AUC(0-)(ngh/mL)
Cmax(ng/mL)
C(ng/mL)
LPV/r 21 0.84(0.75, 0.93)
0.88(0.80, 0.98)
0.86(0.73, 1.02)
ATV/r 18 1.38(1.25, 1.53)
1.48(1.29, 1.71)
1.44(1.25, 1.65)
Extra RTV (200mg total) 11 1.15
(0.99, 1.35)1.10
(0.92, 1.32)1.06
(0.93, 1.20)
TPV Day 5 C ratio 0.53 (non-steady state)
BCV Increased by Addition of ATV to BCV/r
BCV/r = 300mg/100mg q12hBCV/r + ATV = 300mg/100mg q12h + 300mg q24h
Minor Reduction in BCV Combined with LPV/r
BCV/r = 300mg/100mg q12hLPV/r + BCV = 400mg/100mg q12h + 300mg q12h
Time (h)0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Pla
sma
BC
V (n
g/m
L)
50
100
150
200
250
300
BCV/r (C+D)
LPV/r + BCV (C+D)
Hepatic Transaminases in TPV Study
• BCV 600mg + RTV 200mg + TPV 500mg q12h• 7/12 subjects had increased ALT• Maximum DAIDS Toxicity Criteria
• Grade 1 (N=3), Grade 2 (N=2), Grade 3 (N=2)
• Regimen terminated prematurely• low risk tolerance, high probability of interaction
• Elevations returned to baseline following d/c
• BCV 600mg + RTV 200mg q12h • 1/12 subjects with Grade 1 increase in ALT• Regimen completed as planned
Study Safety Summary
LPV/r study (HPR10004):• Combination generally well-tolerated (expected AEs)
ATV study (HPR10009):• No SAEs, clinically significant trends in vitals/ECGs• Total AEs and ocular icterus more common with ATV• Increased bilirubin common with ATV, none with BCV/r• Treatment discontinuations and Grade 4 elevations in total
bilirubin more common for combination
TPV study (HPR103377):• BCV with TPV 500mg + RTV 200mg regimen was discontinued
prematurely due to hepatic transaminase elevations• BCV with RTV 200mg regimen generally well tolerated – no
treatment-related discontinuations
Phase I Summary of Drug Related AEs (5%)*
Adverse EventBCV 300mg/r
N=72BCV 600mg/r
N=32Any Event 31 (43%) 9 (38%)Gastrointestinal 16 (22%) 7 (22%)
Diarrhea 6 (8%) 3 (9%)
Nausea 3 (4%) 3 (9%)
Flatulence 4 (6%) 0Nervous System 9 (13%) 6 (19%)
Headache 6 (8%) 2 (6%)
Dizziness 2 (3%) 3 (9%)
Skin/Subcutaneous 7 (10%) 0
Pruritis 5 (7%) 0
Rash 5 (7%) 0
* Phase I studies conducted in healthy subjects
Conclusions
• BCV may be co-administered with LPV/r without dose adjustment
• For BCV/r + ATV, plasma exposure to both BCV and ATV increased. Clinical significance unknown, but ATV dose reduction may be considered.
• BCV should not be co-administered with TPV/r due to reduced plasma BCV trough concentrations
• Potential for increased hepatic transaminases in patients• RTV 200mg does not significantly increase steady-
state plasma BCV exposure• Dual boosted PI options for BCV include LPV/r and
ATV