ovarian cancer challenges for primary care
DESCRIPTION
Ovarian Cancer Challenges for Primary Care. Madhavi Venigalla, MD Medical Oncology/Hematology Lakeland Regional Cancer Center. OBJECTIVES Discuss screening/early detection practices Describe presenting symptoms Review current recommendations. Ovarian Cancer. Incidence: 1 in 55 women - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ovarian CancerChallenges for Primary Care
Madhavi Venigalla, MDMedical Oncology/Hematology
Lakeland Regional Cancer Center
OBJECTIVES
Discuss screening/early detection practices Describe presenting symptoms Review current recommendations
Ovarian Cancer
Incidence: 1 in 55 womenACS statistics for 2012:22,280 new cases (stable since 1992)15,500 deathsWorldwide: Most common cancer in womenRates highest in developed countries
SymptomsNonspecificPersistent
SymptomsBloatingPelvic or abdominal painDifficulty eating or feeling full quicklyUrgency or urinary frequencyMost common is abdominal enlargement
SymptomsOther symptoms commonly reported
FatigueIndigestionBack painPain with intercourseConstipationMenstrual irregularities
Risk FactorsGenetic predisposition
Family history is strongest riskBreast-ovarian cancer syndromeLynch II syndrome
Cancer of colon, breast, endometrium and HNPCC
Risk Factor (cont’d)Breast-ovarian syndrome
Germline mutation in one of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA or BRCA2
Prevalence General population is 1 in 300 Ashkenazi Jewish is 2 in 100
Risk Factors (cont’d)Age
Annual incidence in women age 50-75 is 50 per 100,000, twice the rate in younger women
Risk Factors (cont’d)Decrease risk:
PregnancyOCPBreast feedingTubal ligationHysterectomy
Increase risk:InfertilityEndometriosisPeri or post
menopausal history of medications
Oral contraceptive UseDuration of use Relative Risk Never 13-6 months .67-11 months .71-4 years .65-9 years .4>9 years .2 N England J Med 316:650 1987
Screening TestsThere is no standardized test to detect
ovarian cancer at an early stageCA-125: most widely used screening method
Specificity is limited False elevations in: endometriosis, fibroids,
cirrhosis w/- ascites, PID, cancers of breast, lung, pancreas, pleural or peritoneal fluid due to any cancer
Clinical TrialsLarge studies in Sweden:
Low positive predictive value of 3%Experts feel a screening protocol should have a
PPV of at least 10% (no more than 9 healthy women with false positive screening would undergo unnecessary procedures for each case of ovarian cancer detected)
Clinical Trials (cont’d)PLCO trial
78,237 healthy women between 55 & 74Annual CA 125 and transvaginal ultrasound4 year follow up: PPV of 2.6%
UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer ScreeningPurpose
Evaluate a screening strategy using a risk of ovarian cancer algorithm on the basis of age, CA 125 profile and transvaginal ultrasound
Method (control and screening group)• Primary screening w/CA 125 – if abnormal• Secondary screening w/CA 125 & TVUS
UK Trial (cont’d)• Results:
6532 women were screened and assigned risk levels 1228 intermediate risk had repeat CA 125 and 53
were classified as elevated risk 16 women had surgery
11-benign pathology 1 recurrent breast cancer in ovaries 1 borderline and 3 with invasive epithelial ovarian
cancer Specificity and PPV for primary invasive epithelial
ovarian cancer were 99.8% and 19% respectively JCO Vol 23(31) Nov 1 2005
Novel Tumor MarkerHE4
Human epididymis protein 4Only approved for monitoring women with
ovarian cancer for diagnosing recurrence or progression
Pelvic UltrasonographyObserver dependentUKC TOCS:
48,230 womenPPV was 5.3%
Multimodal Screening
CA 125 and ultrasoundPLCO Usual Care13 year follow-upNo difference in stage of ovarian cancer or
mortality
Synthesis of EvidenceWomen at average risk
Screening is not recommendedWomen at increased risk
Counseling, genetic testingWomen w/high risk family history
NCCN recommends Q6 month CA 125 and TVUS starting @age 30 or 5-10 yrs earlier than earliest age of 1st diagnosis of ovarian cancer
Ovarian Cancer Follow upMonitor CA-125Physical Exam
Including pelvic examCT scan/PET scan as clinically indicatedConsider family history evaluation if not done
previously
Key Points for the NPIdentify at-risk
patientsEducate Intervene earlyProvide evidence
based care