outlook on fp7 2007-2013 carlos saraiva martins dg rtd - unit b1 beijing - june 2006
TRANSCRIPT
Outlook on FP7
2007-2013
Carlos SARAIVA MARTINS
DG RTD - Unit B1
Beijing - June 2006
Legal basis
The Framework Programme (FP) is the main instrument for funding scientific research and technological development
Treaty of European Community, (part 3, title XVIII, art. 166, pag.114) :
The Union shall establish a multi-annual “Framework programme” for research….
1952: ECSC treaty; first projects started March 1955 1957: EURATOM treaty; Joint Research Centre set up 1973: BCR programme 1983: ESPRIT programme 1984: First Framework Programme (1984-1987) 1987: “European Single Act” - science becomes a Community
responsibility; Second Framework Programme (1987-1991)
1990: Third Framework Programme (1990-1994) 1993: Treaty on European Union;
role of RTD in the EU enlarged 1994: Fourth Framework Programme (1994-1998) 1998: Fifth Framework Programme (1998-2002) 2000: European Research Area 2002: Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) 2005: Proposal for the Seventh Framework Programme (2007-2013)
EU research: the story so far
Political initiative
ERA = European Research Area
Concept and vision, political initiative by Philippe Busquin
Objectives
New impetus for RTD
RTD as key factor for European innovation
Strengthening the complementarity between Member States
Lisbon strategy
Research
Growth and Jobs
Education Innovation
S&T contributes to the Lisbon objectives: economic growth, employment creation, environmental protection, social challenges: fight poverty, improve human health and quality of life
3,27 5,36 6,6
13,12 14,9617,5
50,5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1984-1987 1987-1991 1990-1994 1994-1998 1998-2002 2002-2006 2007-2013
€ Billion
Budgets of the EU Framework Programmes
Why double the FP7 budget?(EC proposal – 6 April 2005)
– Help exerting leverage on national and private investment
– Help leverage business R&D (EU wide projects, solutions and market)
– Brings EU public R&D spending close to 1% target
– Encourage Member States Tackle fragmentation of research
– More excellence through EU wide competition
– Achieve critical mass, share knowledge and facilities
– Better dissemination across the EU
– Stronger coordination
Focusing and Integrating Community research
Strengthening the foundations of the ERA
Structuring the ERA
Gen
omic
s
IST
Cit
izen
s
Nan
otec
hnol
ogie
s.
Aer
onau
tics
Foo
d
Sus
tain
able
dev
.
Thematic priorities
FP6 (2002-2006)
“Wider field of Science”
SMEs
International co-operation
JRC
NESTSupport to
policies
Marie Curie, Research Infrastructures, Science & Society
ERA -Net
Specific Programmes
FP6 (2002-2006)
JRC (nuclear)JRC (nuclear)
JRC (non-nuclear)JRC (non-nuclear)
EuratomEuratom
+
Specific Programmes
What’s new ?
Substantial annual budget increase
Frontier research (~ EUR 1 billion per year)
Joint Technology Initiatives (JTI)
A Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (loan finance EIB)
Regions Knowledge (regional RTD driven clusters)
Logistical and administrative tasks transferred to external structures
Duration of 7 years
Specific Programmes
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
People – Human PotentialPeople – Human Potential
JRC (nuclear)JRC (nuclear)
Ideas – Frontier ResearchIdeas – Frontier Research
Capacities – Research CapacityCapacities – Research Capacity
JRC (non-nuclear)JRC (non-nuclear)
EuratomEuratom
+
FP7 2007 - 2013
FP7 budget(Non-Nuclear)
JRC3.4%Capacities
8.5%
People9.4%
Ideas14.8%
Cooperation63.9%
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
FP6 FP7
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
Collaborative research(Collaborative projects; Networks of Excellence; Coordination/support actions)
Collaborative research(Collaborative projects; Networks of Excellence; Coordination/support actions)
Joint Technology InitiativesJoint Technology Initiatives
Coordination of non-Community research programmes(ERA-NET; ERA-NET+; Article 169)
Coordination of non-Community research programmes(ERA-NET; ERA-NET+; Article 169)
International CooperationInternational Cooperation
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
Support will be implemented across all themes through:
“Emerging needs” and “Unforeseen policy needs”“Emerging needs” and “Unforeseen policy needs”
Cooperation – Collaborative researchCooperation – Collaborative research
FP6 FP7
Joint Technology Initiatives
Global Monitoring for Environment
and Security
Global Monitoring for Environment
and Security
Hydrogen and Fuel Cells for a Sustainable Energy
Future
Hydrogen and Fuel Cells for a Sustainable Energy
Future
Towards new Nanoelectronics
Approaches
Towards new Nanoelectronics
Approaches
Embedded systemsEmbedded systems
Aeronautics and Air Transport
Aeronautics and Air Transport
Innovative Medicines for the Citizens
of Europe
Innovative Medicines for the Citizens
of Europe
Long-term public/private partnership
Joint Technology Initiatives
May Take the Form of Joint Undertakings – Article 171 of the Treaty
– “The Community may set up joint undertakings or any other structure necessary for the efficient execution of Community research, technological development and demonstration programmes”
Initial training of researchersMarie Curie Networks
Initial training of researchersMarie Curie Networks
Life-long training and career developmentIndividual Fellowships
Co-financing of regional/national/international programmes
Life-long training and career developmentIndividual Fellowships
Co-financing of regional/national/international programmes
Industry-academia pathways and partnershipsIndustry-Academia Scheme
Industry-academia pathways and partnershipsIndustry-Academia Scheme
International dimensionOutgoing International Fellowships; Incoming International Fellowships
International Cooperation Scheme; Reintegration grants
International dimensionOutgoing International Fellowships; Incoming International Fellowships
International Cooperation Scheme; Reintegration grants
Specific actionsExcellence awards
Specific actionsExcellence awards
People – Human PotentialPeople – Human Potential
1. Research Infrastructures
2. Research for the benefit of SMEs
3. Regions of Knowledge
4. Research Potential
5. Science in Society
6. Activities of International Cooperation
Capacities – Research CapacityCapacities – Research Capacity
Capacities – Research CapacityCapacities – Research Capacity
Aims at stimulating creativity and excellence by funding ‘frontier research’ by ‘individual teams’ competing at European level
“For researchers – by researchers”
Setting-up of a European Research Council (ERC)
Ideas – Frontier Research
Ideas – Frontier Research
Research at the frontiers is an intrinsically risky venture
it is characterised by an absence of disciplinary boundaries
We need to avoid outmoded distinctions:
Between “basic” and “applied” research
Between “science” and “technology”
Between “traditional” disciplines
Frontier research
The Principal Investigator (the ‘team leader’) has
power to assemble his/her research group regardless of size
and the freedom to choose the research topic.
Individual teams should consist of a grouping of researchers which meets the needs of the project, without “artificial” administrative constraints; thus members may be drawn from one or several legal entities, from either within or across national boundaries, including third countries
Individual team
Scientific Council
Dedicated implementation structure Executive Agency
Mid-term review: another structure (?) based possibly on Article 171
ERC organization
Founding members were announced on 18 July 2005 following an independent identification procedure:
Lord Patten of Barnes, Chancellor of Oxford and Newcastle Universities (Chairman)
Dr. Catherine Bréchignac, Director, Institut d’Optique, Université Paris Sud ( CNRS)
Prof. Jüri Engelbrecht, Vice-President of the Estonian Academy of Sciences
Prof. Guido Martinotti, Facoltà di Sociologia Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Prof. Erwin Neher, Director, Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen
ERC Scientific Council
A. Organisations consulted by the Identification Committee- Academia Europaea (organisation representing individual scientists and scholars)
- ALLEA (All European Academies)- EARTO (European Association of Research and Technology Organisations)
- EASAC (European Academies' Science Advisory Council)- ESF (European Science Foundation)
- EIRMA (European Industrial Research Management Association)- EUA (European University Association)
- EUROHORCs (European Heads of Research Councils)- UNICE (Union des industries de la CE), Working Group “Research and Innovation”.
B. Other organisations that sent nominations
- Biosciences Federation - ESO (European Southern Observatory)- CBI Confederation of British Industry - EuCheMS (European Association for Chemical and
Molecular Sciences)- COSCE (Confederation of Scientific Societies of Spain) - EURADIA (European Research Area in
Diabetes)- EAESP (European Association of Experimental Social Psychology) - EURADIA (European Research Area in Diabetes)- EASD (European Association for the study of Diabetes) - EUROSCIENCE- EATCS (European Association for Theoretical Computer Science) - FENS (Federation of European Neuroscience Societies)- EEA (European Economic Association) - Fundación Ramón Areces- EFIS (European Federation of Immunological Societies) - IADR (International Association for Dental
Research)- EFOMP (European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics) - Institusjonen Fritt Ord (the Freedom of
Expression
- EMBO (European Molecular Biology Organization) - JET (Joint European Torus -
Nuclear fusion)- EMS (European Mathematical Society) - MCFA (Marie Curie Fellowship Association)- ENII The European Network of Immunology Institutes - Slovak Nuclear Society
- ENSA (European Neutron Scattering Association) - The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary
Foundation- EOS (European Optical Society) - The Hague Club- EPFL (Ecole Polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne) - UK Research Councils- EPS (European Physical Society)- EPSO (European Plant Science Organisation)- ERCIM (European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics)- ESHG (European Society of Human Genetics)- Estonian Academy of Sciences
ERC Scientific Council
Founding members were announced on 18 July 2005 following an independent identification procedure
Working in advance of the FP7 decision in the development phase of the ERC
22 Members
Chair: Fotis Kafatos
Vice Chairs:
Helga Nowotny
Daniel Estève
ERC Scientific Council
ERC SC – The 22 Founding Members
Dr. Claudio BORDIGNON (IT)
Prof. Manuel CASTELLS (ES)
Prof. Dr. Paul J. CRUTZEN (NL)
Prof. Mathias DEWATRIPONT (BE)
Dr. Daniel ESTEVE (FR)
Prof. Pavel EXNER (CZ)
Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim FREUND (DE)
Prof. Wendy HALL (UK)
Prof. Dr. Car l- Henrik HELDIN (SE)
Prof. Dr. Fotis C. KAFATOS (GR)
Prof. Dr. Michal KLEIBER (PL)
Prof. Norbert KROO (HU)
Prof. Maria Teresa V.T. LAGO (PT)
Dr. Oscar MARIN PARRA (ES)
Prof Robert MAY (UK)
Prof. Helga NOWOTNY (AT)
Prof. Christiane NÜSSLEIN-VOLHARD (DE)
Dr. Leena PELTONEN-PALOTIE (FI)
Prof. Alain PEYRAUBE (FR)
Dr. Jens R. ROSTRUP-NIELSEN (DK)
Prof. Salvatore SETTIS (IT)
Prof. Dr.med. Rolf M. ZINKERNAGEL (CH))
High level scientists reflecting the full scope of European research, nominated by Commission decision
Role:Establish overall scientific strategy, preparation of work programmes (including calls for proposals, detailed criteria of excellence, …)
Define peer review methodology; ensure selection and accreditation of experts
Monitor quality of operations and evaluate programme implementation
Assure communication with the scientific community
ERC Scientific Council
Execute work programme as established by the Scientific Council
Implement calls for proposals (information and support to applicants; proposal reception/eligibility check; etc.)
Organise peer review evaluation
Establish grant agreements, transfer funds
Administer scientific and financial aspects and follow-up of grant agreements
ERC Dedicated Implementation Structure
Guarantor of the autonomy and integrity of the ERC
Ensure that implementation follows principles of autonomy
Adopt work programme as established by the Scientific Council
Provide annual report on ERC operations to Council and European Parliament
The European Commission’s duties
Support to individual teams Investigator-driven frontier research All areas of science and technology Simplified grant 100% reimbursement Independent scientific governance
(Scientific Council) Dedicated implementation structure
(Executive Agency)
Specific programme “Ideas”: Innovations compared with “standard” FP programmes
ERC Starting Grant (< 10 years from PhD) ERC Advanced Grant
- Operating on a bottom-up basis- Not duplicating other FP7 activities- Two-step procedure- 100 k€ - 400 k€ for up to 5 years
Two Funding Streams:
The exact definition of criteria and the relative weighting is not yet established but basically excellence will be the sole criterion, possibly a blend of:
the potential of the people (and their track record)
Excellence of the project
Evaluation criteria
Scientific Council will set parameters and oversee the process.
Excellence and transparency are key principles
Permanent pool of accredited peer reviewers needed (= World’s best scientists and scholars)
High throughput, quasi-continuous processes may be necessary
Peer review process
Approximately 15 high level panels (assisted by referees)
Each panel will have a highly respected Chair and 10 members
One member of the SC will attend each panel’s meeting as observer
The selection of the panel chairs and the structure of the panels under SC responsibility
Cross-disciplinarity proposals considered by two different panels
Evaluation methodology(not definitive)
FP7 Participation rules(adopted 23.12.05)
Basis for Funding:• Reimbursement of eligible costs• Flat rates• Lump sum amounts
Maximum funding rates• Research and technological activities – 50% of eligible costs Except:• Public bodies, universities, non-profit organisations – 75%• SMEs – 75%• Demonstration activities – 50% of eligible costs• Frontier research actions (ERC) – 100%• Coordination and support actions – 100%• Training and career development of researchers actions – 100%
European Strategies European Strategies For For
International Research International Research CooperationCooperation
Aim of EU research (I):Aim of EU research (I):
Support European competitiveness through strategic partnerships with third countries in selected fields of science
Address specific problems facing third countries on the basis of mutual interest and mutual benefit
Address global challenges within the Communities international commitments
Use S&T cooperation to reinforce the Community’s external relations and other relevant policy
Aim of EU research (II):Aim of EU research (II):
More than ever we have no other choice than to work together to tackle universal concerns without boundaries.
Cooperation shortens the path leading from science to innovation and from knowledge to solutions. We need to share information, knowledge, practices and results
Need to carry out better research
FP7 – Participating FP7 – Participating countriescountries
Full participants of FP7
Third Countries
MEMBER STATES ASSOCIATEDCOUNTRIES
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIONPARTNER COUNTRIES
ACC (TR, BU, RO, HR)
NON-ASSOCIATEDCANDIDATE COUNTRIES
INDUSTRIALISEDCOUNTRIES
Candidate Countries
International Scientific International Scientific CooperationCooperation
Third Countries:Third Countries:Industrialised countries (US, Canada, Japan,..)
Associated countries (Norway, Switzerland, Israel, …)
International Cooperation Partner Countries (ICPC):
Mediterranean partner Countries
Western Balkans
Eastern European and Central Asian countries
ACP, ASIA, Latin America
(Emerging economies (e.g. China, India, Brazil, Russia, South Africa))
International Scientific International Scientific CooperationCooperation
ICPCICPC
ICPC is a third country which the Commission classifies as low-income, lower-middle-income or upper-middle-income country and which is identified as such in the work programmes
International Cooperation International Cooperation in in CooperationCooperation
- Opening of all themes to third countriesOpening of all themes to third countries
- Specific International Cooperation actions Specific International Cooperation actions in themesin themes
International CooperationInternational Cooperation in in IDEAS/ERCIDEAS/ERC
The ERC should be integrated into the world-wide research scene
Participation of co-investigators from ICPC decided by the principal investigator justified on the basis of added scientific value (excellence)
Payment of co-investigators from ICPC countries on basis of mutual scientific benefit (or according to relevant concluded agreements)
International CooperationInternational Cooperation in in IDEASIDEAS
Cooperation with scientists from ICPC countries is expected simply because that is what scientists do – naturally, spontaneously and, often, effectively
The flow of ideas does not know of any national frontiers and scientists cooperate and compete at the same time
ICPC participation is welcome providing this will help the individual team to compete for excellence, for recognition and for results.
International CooperationInternational Cooperationin in PEOPLEPEOPLE
International outgoing fellowships
International incoming fellowships
Partnerships to support exchange of researchers
Support of common initiatives between European organizations and countries with S&T agreements
Measures to counter the risk of ‘brain drain’ from developing countries/emerging economies
International CooperationInternational Cooperationin in CapacitiesCapacities
1. Policy Dialogue1. Policy Dialogue
3. Coordination of National Policies & Activities3. Coordination of National Policies & Activities
2. S&T Cooperation Partnerships2. S&T Cooperation Partnerships
1. Mapping of research needs, building commitment, impact assessments, linking S&T to other policies
2. Involvement of industrial and economic operators, specific focused international activities
3. Set common goals, strategies and policies, use of S&T inputs in foreign, trade and development policies
Towards the Seventh Framework Programme2007-2013 (“co-decision”)
Council decides by qualified majority except on EP amendments not approved by the Commission
FP evaluations
CommissionProposal
(absolute majority of members)
Consultations (online etc)
CREST
European Research
Advisory Board
Council
European Parliament
Opinion Commonposition
AmendmentsConciliation:
joint textAdoption
1
2
3 4 5
4 5
Direct approval if agreement with EP
(within 3 months)
(approval within6 weeks)
(approval within6 weeks)
(within 3 months)
New !
Commission opinionon EP amendments
FP7 Timetable
6 April 2005 Commission’s proposal
21 September 2005 Specific programmes’ proposal
Nov 2005 FP7 partial agreement at Council
23 December 2005 Rules for the participation
June 2006 FP7 plenary vote at EP
July 2006? Council and EP common position
July 2006? Council – political agreement SPs September 2006? EP starts 2nd reading Oct 2006 ? Commission – adoption of WPs Nov 2006 ? Council Decision Dec 2006? Adoption of FP7 Dec 2006? First calls for proposals December ? Fev 8-9, 2007 March 7-18, 2007
Launch Conference Multipliers Symposium on Science Public exhibition on EU research
Information
ERC Scientific Council: http://erc.europa.eu
EU research: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research
EU Basic Research Policy: http://ec.europa.eu/research/future/basic_research/index_en.html
Seventh Framework Programme: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/index_en.cfm
Information on research programmes and projects:http://www.cordis.lu
International Scientific cooperation policy:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/iscp
Information requests:[email protected]
Directorate-General for Research
“Anticipation of Scientific and Technological Needs: Fundamental Research”
The End