outcome research 1 time-to-event, event history/event outcome wei-chu chie preventive medicine
TRANSCRIPT
outcome research 1
Time-to-event, Time-to-event, event event
history/event history/event outcomeoutcome
Wei-Chu ChieWei-Chu ChiePreventive MedicinePreventive Medicine
outcome research 2
Long-term outcomesLong-term outcomes– Time to events /events (change of status)
• mortality/survival (final)• recurrence• onset of an expected disease/adverse
effect– ‘hard’ endpoints: more objective/most
important in primary endpoints– two components:
• time or person-time• event: binary, clear-cut:
occurred/censored
outcome research 3
Long-term outcomesLong-term outcomes• Strengths
– objective: ‘hard’ endpoints– relatively more accurate and precise– relatively easier to access and measure
• Weakness– time consuming– too much simplified/insensitive– too late for prevention
outcome research 4
Classification of EventsClassification of Events• Death• Recurrence/metastasis, ...• Occurrence
– diseases– complications– adverse effects
outcome research 5
DeathDeath– The last ‘end’ point: late and insensitive– Easy to access: registry available– Event per se: precise and accurate– Causes of death: less precise and
accurate• better in easy-diagnosing, highly fatal
diseases with short courses/some cancers, major injuries
• bad example: stigmatization of diabetes
outcome research 6
DeathDeath• Overall deaths
– overall impact of the treatment
• Specific cause(s) of death– which the treatment planned to prevent– e.g. fatal myocardial infarction, breast
cancer death
outcome research 7
DeathDeath• Usually used in
– (sometimes) vaccination– screening– clinical trials– prognostic factors studies
outcome research 8
Recurrence/metastasis/Recurrence/metastasis/occurrence of certain occurrence of certain
complicationscomplications• Closer and more sensitive to treatment• not too late for prevention • not always predictive to the last endpoint• more difficult to access: must be from
clinical records or follow-up• precision and accuracy depend on quality of
clinical records• affected by patients’ moving between
different hospitals
outcome research 9
Recurrence/metastasis/Recurrence/metastasis/occurrence of certain occurrence of certain
complicationscomplications
• Usually used in– diseases with different and progressive
status• e.g. cancer: recurrence, metastasis• e.g. diabetes: occurrence of retinopathy,
nephropathy, neuropathy, stroke, myocardial infarction, …
– multiple recurrence: multiplicative intensity models
– Markov process
outcome research 10
Occurrence of effects or Occurrence of effects or adverse effectsadverse effects
• Nature: change of rate (diseases/conditions)
– expected helpful effects (efficacy)– side or adverse effects including deaths
(safety)– unexpected helpful effects: off-label use
• Strengths and weakness– The same strengths and weakness of
recurrence/metastasis/occurrence of certain complications
outcome research 11
Occurrence of effects or Occurrence of effects or adverse effectsadverse effects
• Usually used in– clinical trials of vaccine, drugs or procedure
s– pharmaco-epidemiology
• post-marketing surveillance• adverse effects after applied to population
outcome research 12
Characteristics of eventsCharacteristics of events• Usually binary at a time
– sometimes polychotomous– sometimes multiple at different time points
• Change of status: 0 to 1• Person-time or time passed
outcome research 13
Time to startTime to start• Inception cohort
– from the onset of a disease
• proxy of the ‘onset’– first report– first visit/admission– first diagnosis
outcome research 14
Time ‘at’ the eventTime ‘at’ the event• The event already occurred
– left censoring
• The event occurred between two observations– interval censoring
• The event hasn’t occurred to the end– right censoring (usual definition)– non- susceptibility
outcome research 15
The onset of the event and its The onset of the event and its proxyproxy
• Exact onset• proxy
– first and each subsequent reports– first and each subsequent
visits/admissions– first diagnosis and each subsequent
visits/admissions with the same diagnosis
outcome research 16
Person-time: open or closed Person-time: open or closed cohortcohort
– The real denominator or ‘field’ to grow events
– Best developed in epidemiologic studies• cut personal characteristics*time into small
pieces• pool small pieces bearing same
characteristics together e.g. [40-44 years male obese smoking …]
• count events growing from different pieces
– Poisson’s regression– Rates: rate difference & rate ratio
outcome research 17
Person-time: open or closed Person-time: open or closed cohortcohort
• Assumptions and limitations– constant hazard assumption– no memory (independent characteristic
groups)– not considering non-susceptibility
• some subjects will NEVER develop the outcome
outcome research 18
Time to event: open or closed Time to event: open or closed cohortcohort
– Follow up from inception to a certain time later
– Each individual:• expected event occurred• competing event occurred• censored (no event occurred)
– Two components• time: from inception to event or censoring• event: yes/no
– Rate ratio (hazard ratio), mean survival time
outcome research 19
Time to event: open or closed Time to event: open or closed cohortcohort
– Descriptive and simple comparison:• Kaplan-Meier product-limit• other methods• Log-rank test
– Cox’s proportional hazard regression• When constant hazard does not exist while
constant proportion of hazards exist– parametric part: hazard ratio exp (beta)– non-parametric part
outcome research 20
Time to event: open or closed Time to event: open or closed cohortcohort
• Assumptions and limitations– constant proportion of hazards
assumption• not always exists in clinical conditions• time-dependent hazard ratios
– not considering non-susceptibility• some subjects will NEVER develop the
outcome
outcome research 21
Event at the end of follow-up: Event at the end of follow-up: closed cohortclosed cohort
– Count the proportion of events in different exposure levels or groups of predictors
– Statistical methods• Chi-square/Multiple logistic regression
– binary outcomes (responses)– polychotomous outcomes (responses)
– Problems• inadequate time of follow-up• non-susceptibility
outcome research 22
Access to data/instrument Access to data/instrument selectionselection
• Event/time-to-event– primary data: follow-up– secondary data: electronic or paper
• mortality: national mortality registry• cancer: cancer registry• other special registries• NHI database• hospital records
outcome research 23
Primary data: follow-upPrimary data: follow-up• Methods
– telephone/mail/visit/interview/informants– “How are you?” (Are you still alive? What
happened to you since last follow-up?)– validated by clinical
records/informants/registry
• Limitations– moving/reluctance/dishonest/unable to
validate– not easy to follow up all subjects
outcome research 24
Secondary data: national Secondary data: national registerregister
– Major registries and steps of use• mortality/cancer/other (local or time-limited)• application/consent• personal electronic data protection law• key variable: citizen’s ID linkage and
removal• checking variables: gender/date of birth/ ...
– Limitations• only death and limited important events• inaccuracy and incompleteness
outcome research 25
Secondary data: NHI claimsSecondary data: NHI claims• Major strength: wide coverage• Major weakness: personal electronic
data protection law/scrambled ID– inaccessible to original record/individual,
unable to examine validity of data or improve quality
– data bases linkage impossible: poverty of contents
outcome research 26
Secondary data: NHI claimsSecondary data: NHI claims• currently available data bases (CD
by month/year)– basic information files– utilization records:
• one utilization record as unit• outpatients/inpatients/pharmacies• inpatient records have better quality
– individual-based files• all utilization records of sampled insured
individuals
outcome research 27
Secondary data: NHI claimsSecondary data: NHI claims• Making the best use for event outcomes
– external linkage impossible• preparation: informed consents of study
subjects
– internal linkage• identify a certain inception cohort (all
newly-diagnosed inpatients with a certain disease or undergoing a certain procedure)
• linkage to all later utilization records with the citizen’s ID
outcome research 28
Secondary data: NHI claimsSecondary data: NHI claims– Internal linkage: incidence/utilization/cost
• Incidence of certain illness (new, recurrent) if tracing long enough by internal linkage of utilization
• effects/adverse effects of certain procedures• health care cost
– Count existing registers: prevalence/incidence• prevalence of certain serious illness重大傷病• incidence … if tracing long enough
– Not good for death: die at home
outcome research 29
Secondary data: hospital Secondary data: hospital recordsrecords
– computerized• hospital cancer registry• hospital NHI claims data• other computerized records
– not computerized• written form on medical records• special tests/examinations/studies
outcome research 30
Secondary data: hospital Secondary data: hospital recordsrecords
• Major strengths– validation possible– more detailed data available beyond events
• Major weakness– kept by separate hospitals/patients moving– quality unsure/information needed not always
existing– inappropriate for death ascertainment
outcome research 31
Secondary data: hospital Secondary data: hospital recordsrecords
• Making best use– from external data or studies
• informed consent and linkage by citizen’s ID
• patients’ authorization and records check– internal linkage by chart ID: usually limited
by patients’ moving– linkage to death registry/NHI data base
(later) by citizen’s ID– cross -hospital cooperation
outcome research 32
Multiple sourcesMultiple sources– Concept of multiple triangulation– use more than one data source– mutually check to improve validity and
ascertainment of the event• e.g. registry/records + follow-up• e.g. records + laboratory data• linkage with ID/check with date of birth/gender• check and correction of incompatible information• set up guidelines/inter or intra-observer reliability