out of the darkness and into the light: students with disabilities’ perceptions and perspectives...

24
Out of the Darkness and Into the Light: Students with Disabilities’ Perceptions and Perspectives on Writing in the Secondary Classroom Jacqueline Mantz. M.S. Special Education

Upload: winfred-allen

Post on 19-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

 

Out of the Darkness and Into the Light: Students with Disabilities’ Perceptions and Perspectives on Writing in the Secondary Classroom

Jacqueline Mantz. M.S. Special Education

“Writing is not life, but I think it is sometimes a way back to life.” (king, On Writing)

Literature Review

Examine the history of special education Review academic performance of students with

disabilities Discuss Disability Theory and Reproduction Theory Review Student Voice Survey effective writing strategies for general

education and special education

History of Special Education

Until the 1970s, there were no federal laws that explicitly protected the rights of citizens with disabilities.

Previous to 1975, only one out of 5 children with disabilities attended public school.

History In 1975, the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA)

recognized children’s rights Attend public school Have the services they required free of charge Be educated along their non-disabled peers whenever

appropriate (Aron and Loprest, 2012).

History of Special Education

Students with disabilities were guaranteed a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE).

The individual education plan (IEP), required by Congress, outlined the services for the student and upheld every student's FAPE. (Yell, Katsiyannis & Hazelkorn, 2007).

History of Special Education

By 2005, 6.7 million children were eligible for special education services.

Students with disabilities still have lower academic performance, less rigorous education expectations and higher dropout rates than their non-disabled peers (Aron & Loprest, 2012).

Lens of Disability Theory

In our view it is society which disables physically impaired people. Disability is something imposed on top of our impairments by the way we are unnecessarily isolated and excluded from full participation in society. Disabled people are therefore an oppressed group in society (UPIAS, 1976 p. 14).

Disability Theory

Individual and Medical View: Sees disability as a tragedy and as something that requires fixing

Social View: Looks at how society is constructed and the barriers facing individuals (Priestley, 1998)

Emancipatory Approach

The emancipatory approach then strives for people with disabilities to be valued participants and be represented in an accurate manner (Barnes & Mercer, 1997).

Reproduction Theory

Jean Anyon in Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work (1980) documented the visible and hidden ways in which the education system reproduced the existing social classes.

Pierre Bourdieu (1998) claimed that social reproduction was due to advantages based on the students’ social classes.

Student Voice

Many times when a person speaks about others, they begin to speak for others (Alcoff, 1992)

So the researcher may reinforce inequities in systems such as education (Humphries, 1994)

Educators may reinforce inequities in education rather than create meaningful change (Fielding, 2004)

Effective Strategies for All Writers (Graham & Perin, 2004)

Writing Strategies Summarization Collaborative Writing Specific Product Goals Word Processing Sentence-Combining Prewriting Inquiry Activities Process Writing Approach Study of Models Writing for Content Learning

Effective strategies for Students with Disabilities

Olinghouse et al. (2010) suggestions: Teachers should set simple and specific goals for

students’ tasks Teach basic and foundational skills Use the SRSD model in writing papers Reinforce the strengths of the students Explicitly teach sentence construction, paragraph

composition and editing Encourage struggling writers

Strategies to Support Students with Disabilities Post-Secondary

Post-Secondary supports needed within program for students with disabilities:

Diagnostic testing Academic advising Subject area tutoring Counseling (Hadley, 2007)

Reality

Colleges and universities do not always have all components in their programs (Brinckerhoff, 1996).

They have important things to say, and our society needs to hear them. They can tell us about schools that hurt instead of help, and

they can describe how children felt when they are accused of being stupid, lazy, or irresponsible. They can remind us that all students want to learn and can learn, though some learn differently. Above

all, they can teach us to celebrate difference instead of condemning it. (Summers, 1997 p. 100)

Overview of Research

Research designed to assess students with disabilities experiences, perceptions and perspectives of writing instruction in the secondary classroom both in general education and special education classes

Phenomenological research methodology as the goal is to understand the students with disabilities experiences in the secondary classroom setting in regards to writing (Seidman, 2013 &Van Manen, 1990)

Survey will be given to the students in order to have multiple sources of data (Patton, 1989)

References

Achieve, Inc. (2005). Rising to the challenge: Are high school graduates prepared for college and work? Washington, DC: Author.

Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. The Sociology of Education, 162, 1250. Aron, L., & Loprest, P. (2012). Disability and the education system. The future of Children, 22(1), 97-122. Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching

writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 303–318.

Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (1997). Breaking the mold? An introduction to doing disability research. Doing disability research, 1, 1-4.

Blatt, B., & Kaplan, F. (1966). Christmas in purgatory: A photographic essay on mental retardation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction. London: Routledge.   Bourdieu, P. and J.-C. Passeron (1996) Reproduction. London: Sage.   Brame, V. W. (2011). Follow Their Lead: Writing Exercises Based on Successful Authors'

Strategies. Inquiry, 16(1), 41-52. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in

special education. Exceptional children, 71(2), 195-207. Brown, C. (1978). Of snails and skylarks: Poems. Stein and Day.

References

California Department of Education. (2012, June 27). State Schools Chief Tom Torlakson Reports Climb in Graduation Rates for California Students. News Release. Sacramento, California. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr12/yr12rel65.asp

Cameto, R., Levine, P., and Wagner, M. (2004). Transition Planning for Students With Disabilities. A Special Topic Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Caroline, S. (1997). Careless Errors: Teaching Expository Writing to Post-Secondary Students with Learning

Disabilities or Attention Deficit Disorder. Cory, R. C., White, J. M., & Stuckey, Z. (2010). Using Disability Studies Theory to Change Disability Services: A Case Study in Student Activism. Journal of Postsecondary Education and

Disability, 23(1), 28-37. Durant, W., & Durant, A. (2012). The lessons of history. Simon and Schuster. Dworkin, M. S. (1961). Dewey on education: Selections with an introduction and notes. Teachers College Press. Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Kidd, J. K. (2012). Teaching students with

emotional and behavioral disorders to self-advocate through persuasive writing. Exceptionality, 20(2), 71-93. Eckes, S. E., & Ochoa, T. A. (2005). Students with disabilities: Transitioning from high school to higher

education. American Secondary Education, 6-20. Edgerton, R. B. (1967). The cloak of competence. Berkeley. California: University of. Fielding*, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant

realities. British Educational Research Journal,30(2), 295-311.

References

Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Fossey, M., & Simone, C. D. (2000). Access to Educational and Instructional Computer Technologies for Post‐secondary Students with Disabilities: lessons from three empirical studies. Journal of Educational Media, 25(3), 179-201.

Hadley, W. M. (2007). The Necessity of academic accommodations for first-year college students with learning disabilities. Journal of College Admission,195, 9-13.

Humphries, B. (1994). Empowerment and social research: elements for an analytic framework. Rethinking social research: Anti-discriminatory approaches in research methodology, 185-204.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. Guilford Press.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Common core state standards, writing, and students with LD: recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 28-37.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 26(4), 237-249.

Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 26(4), 237-249.

Knoblauch, B., & Sorenson, B. (1

References Knoblauch, B., & Sorenson, B. (1998). IDEA's definition of disabilities. ERIC Digest E560. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). “An adjective is a word hanging down from a noun”: Learning to write and

students with learning disabilities. Annals of dyslexia, 63(1), 65-79. Itard, J. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron. Jiménez, R. T., & Gersten, R. (1999). Lessons and dilemmas derived from the literacy instruction of two Latina/o teachers. American Educational

Research Journal, 36(2), 265-301. Keller, H. (1955). Teacher: Anne Sullivan Macy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national

survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136. Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for

Excellent Education. Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national

survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press. Locke, J. (1989) [1693] Some thoughts concerning education (ed. J. W. Yolton & J S.Yolton) (Oxford, Clarendon Press). Marley, Bob. "Redemption Song." by Bob Marley. Rec. 1980. Island Records/Tuff Gong. Bob Marley and the Wailers' Bob Marley, 1980. CD. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Huang, T., Shaver, D., Knokey, A. M., Yu, J., ... & Cameto, R. (2011). Secondary school

programs and performance of students with disabilities: a special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2

Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high School: a report from

the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011-3005. National Center for Special Education Research.

(NLTS2). NCSER 2012-3000. National Center for Special Education Research.

References

Olinghouse, N., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2010). Evidence-based writing practices at the primary and secondary/tertiary level. In M. Shinn, H. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior in a three-tier model including RTI (pp. 553–570). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

Preston, D. L. (2010). Finding difference: Nemo and friends opening the door to disability theory. English Journal, 56-60.

Ramsey, P. (1983). Fresh perspectives on the school transformation, reproduction: A response to Anyon from Antipodes. Curriculum Inquiry, 13, 295–320 Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2007). The nation’s report card. Writing, 2008-

468. Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press. Skiba, R. J., Simmons, A. B., Ritter, S., Gibb, A. C., Rausch, M. K., Cuadrado, J., &

Chung, C. G. (2008). Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 264-288.

Shanahan, T., MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. Handbook of writing research, 171-183.

References

Smyth, J. (2004). " Dropping Out," Drifting Off, Being Excluded: Becoming Somebody Without School (Vol. 22). Peter Lang. Thoreau, H. D. (1971). Walden. 1854. Ed. J. Lyndon Shanley. Princeton: Princeton UP. Tinklin, T., Riddell*, S., & Wilson, A. (2004). Policy and provision for disabled students

in higher education in Scotland and England: the current state of play. Studies in higher education, 29(5), 637-657.

UPIAS, F. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. Reprinted in edited form in M. Oliver, Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice , 19-29.

Woods-Groves, S., Therrien, W. J., Hua, Y., & Hendrickson, J. M. (2012). Essay-writing strategy for students enrolled in a postsecondary program for individuals with developmental disabilities. remedial and special education, 0741932512440182

Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., & Hazelkorn, M. (2007). Reflections on the 25th anniversary of the US Supreme Court's decision in Board of Education v. Rowley. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(9), 1-12.