our proposal vs traditional decision environment
TRANSCRIPT
Natural habitat around the quarry is affected by landscape dynamics.
Abandonment of forest management practices affects
negatively the forest structure of the plantations of, P. pinea; P. pinaster and P. radiata.
The disappearance of rain fed agriculture leads to afforestation.
Afforestation reduces runoff, thus lowering stream water discharge and even interrupting streamflow.
Natural temporal ponds disappear except on quarries.
The quarry activity involves modifications of landscapes. New landscapes varies from simple deforestation on preparation works, to profound modifications of the relief and soil disappearance.
The extraction phase of the quarry can last several
decades. Time enough for establishing ecosystem
interchange with surrounding habitats
Pond formation on concavities and pond construction as
retention basins to prevent silt transport by runoff.
Net loss of biodiversity linked to open habitat disapperance
Agricultural fauna and mostly ground nesting birds : Miliaria calandra, Athene noctua, Alauda arvensis,
Oryctolagus cuniculus, Tymon lepidus, Bufo calamita..
The quarry as ecosystem services provider
The biodiversity linked to temporal ponds becomes quarry biodiversity.
When local streams dry up on mid summer, the ponds of the quarry become the only source of water.
Roe deer and other species visit the quarry for watering
Quarry areas with natural soil becomes a reserve on flowering herbs and shrubs,
and its pollinator invertebrate fauna.
Soils developed from granite are easily excavated by rabbits. No human hunting area + palatable herbs abundance + easy
den excavation = rabbit abundance.
Quarry ponds become vistually the only suitable reproduction habitat for natterjack toads (Bufo calamita).
Presence of birds of prey (Buteo buteo, Circaetus gallicus). Quarry as hunting
range.
Barren soils, rocks and cliffs as new habitats
Opportunities for rock and cliff nesting species: Bubo bubo,
Monticola solitarius,..
Conventional decision environment
Restoration projects ignoring the ecological interactions of the quarry habitat during the extraction phase.
Aesthetic landscape management restricted to mimicking the pre-
existing situation. Landscape visual treatment = camouflage?
The recuperation of previous relief is the main objective.
Environmental consequences of prevailing dogmas
Loss of quarry habitats
Impact on Natterjack toad
populations
Rabbit population
decline
Frequent erosion problems on attempts to restore
vegetation on slopes over 15%
The camouflage landscape objective rarely accomplished as it is difficult to
grow xenophile vegetation on reconstructed hillsides, and so the cover of vegetation is much lower.
Proposal for an integrated management approach
Restoration projects must be a consequence
of the ecosystem dynamics during the
extraction phase.
Why not to try to "sculpture" stable natural looking cliffs?
Implement the biodiversity management plans during the
extraction phase taking into account the ecosystem services that the quarry
habitat provides to the surrounding natural landscapes.
GIS analysis use to optimize useful extraction volume. Optimize
quarry production on ecological grounds is not a sin!
Ecosystem dynamics and decision environment
A flowchart for our proposal