original evaluation bnp5-c 2015 b-type natriuretic ... · original evaluation bnp5-c 2015 b-type...
TRANSCRIPT
EVALUATIONORIGINAL
BNP5-C 2015 B-type Natriuretic Peptides, 5 Chal
INSTITUTION:
ATTENTION:
CAP NUMBER:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasMedellin ANT CO 050034
KIT INFORMATION:12/11/201510/27/2015
Original Evaluation:
Kit#7181660-01 1
Kit Mailed:28530787 Kit ID:
Ana Velasquez
Next Mailing Date:
2/23/2016
COPIED TO: LAP CAP
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:<NONE>
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 2
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
BNP-11 61 66.1 5.8 450 -0.9 48 84 AcceptableBNP-12 1761 1877.5 111.0 444 -1.0 1544 2211 AcceptableBNP-13 134 140.8 9.9 389 -0.7 111 171 AcceptableBNP-14 460 475.4 35.3 391 -0.4 369 582 AcceptableBNP-15 26 27.2 2.3 387 -0.5 20 35 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
BNPpg/mL (ng/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
BNP5-C 2015
BNP5-B 2015
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28530787
10/27/2015
12/11/2015
BNP5-C 2015 B-type Natriuretic Peptides, 5 ChalE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
EVALUATIONORIGINAL
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - General
INSTITUTION:
ATTENTION:
CAP NUMBER:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasMedellin ANT CO 050034
KIT INFORMATION:12/11/201511/9/2015
Original Evaluation:
Kit#7181660-01 1
Kit Mailed:28010625 Kit ID:
Ana Velasquez
Next Mailing Date:
4/4/2016
COPIED TO: LAP CAP
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 7
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
K-11 13.9 13.67 0.71 32 +0.3 11.5 15.9 AcceptableK-12 43.9 42.84 2.50 32 +0.4 35.3 50.4 AcceptableK-13 117.6 115.25 7.60 32 +0.3 92.4 138.1 AcceptableK-14 48.1 45.99 3.23 33 +0.7 36.3 55.7 AcceptableK-15 48.2 46.03 2.45 33 +0.9 38.6 53.4 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Alpha-Fetoproteinng/mL (ug/L)
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
K-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
K-11 5.4 5.14 0.30 85 +0.9 3.8 6.5 AcceptableK-12 13.1 12.28 0.58 86 +1.4 9.2 15.4 AcceptableK-13 33.9 31.00 1.32 85 +2.2 23.2 38.8 Acceptable
CEAng/mL (ug/L)
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
K-11 9.3 9.55 0.62 84 -0.4 7.1 12.0 AcceptableK-12 15.6 15.20 0.97 83 +0.4 11.3 19.0 AcceptableK-13 32.8 34.71 1.99 84 -1.0 26.0 43.4 AcceptableK-14 16.2 17.48 1.04 83 -1.2 13.1 21.9 AcceptableK-15 16.2 17.49 1.15 83 -1.1 13.1 21.9 Acceptable
Cortisol, serumug/dL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2K-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
K-11 15 16.3 1.0 293 -1.3 13 20 AcceptableK-12 223 234.6 10.7 293 -1.1 202 267 AcceptableK-13 647 665.6 36.8 292 -0.5 555 777 Acceptable
Ferritinng/mL (ug/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
K-11 1.2 1.19 0.20 169 0.0 0.5 1.9 AcceptableK-12 2.5 2.64 0.25 174 -0.6 1.8 3.4 AcceptableK-13 6.1 5.89 0.52 174 +0.4 4.3 7.5 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Folate, serumng/mL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
K-11 3.9 3.61 0.38 279 +0.8 2.4 4.8 AcceptableK-12 110.1 111.96 4.78 292 -0.4 97.6 126.4 AcceptableK-13 259.1 264.67 9.99 293 -0.6 234.6 294.7 AcceptableK-14 91.3 96.97 4.18 294 -1.4 84.4 109.6 AcceptableK-15 98.7 97.46 4.75 294 +0.3 83.2 111.8 Acceptable
hCG, serum, quantmIU/mL (IU/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT iK-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
K-11 56 7 [20]K-12 88 7 [20]K-13 258 7 [20]K-14 102 7 [20]K-15 121 7 [20]
Immunoglobulin EIU/mL (kIU/L)
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
K-11 138.9 147.88 5.74 162 -1.6 130.6 165.2 AcceptableK-12 178.0 195.96 8.96 162 -2.0 169.0 222.9 AcceptableK-13 318.6 350.52 23.18 163 -1.4 280.9 420.1 AcceptableK-14 194.8 207.13 11.17 163 -1.1 173.6 240.7 AcceptableK-15 193.0 206.59 10.67 162 -1.3 174.5 238.7 Acceptable
Triiodothyronineng/dL
ABBOTT ARCHITECT iK-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
K-11 3.4 3.56 0.22 171 -0.7 2.9 4.3 AcceptableK-12 3.9 4.35 0.23 168 -2.0 3.6 5.1 AcceptableK-13 8.6 9.83 0.84 172 -1.5 7.3 12.4 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Free T-3pg/mL
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
K-11 5.7 5.46 0.35 202 +0.7 4.3 6.6 AcceptableK-12 5.4 5.73 0.35 201 -0.9 4.5 6.9 AcceptableK-13 11.3 10.38 0.44 200 +2.1 8.3 12.5 AcceptableK-14 6.1 6.38 0.33 200 -0.8 5.1 7.7 AcceptableK-15 6.2 6.38 0.34 202 -0.5 5.1 7.7 Acceptable
Thyroxineug/dL
ABBOTT ARCHITECT iK-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
K-11 0.8 0.90 0.04 331 -2.3 0.7 1.1 AcceptableK-12 0.8 0.93 0.05 329 -2.7 0.7 1.1 AcceptableK-13 1.7 1.61 0.07 331 +1.2 1.3 1.9 AcceptableK-14 0.9 1.00 0.05 332 -2.2 0.8 1.2 AcceptableK-15 0.9 1.01 0.05 332 -2.1 0.8 1.2 Acceptable
Thyroxine, freeng/dL
ABBOTT ARCHITECT iK-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
K-11 4.52 4.775 0.229 356 -1.1 4.08 5.47 AcceptableK-12 5.32 5.394 0.253 356 -0.3 4.63 6.16 AcceptableK-13 14.38 15.633 0.706 352 -1.8 13.51 17.76 AcceptableK-14 5.69 5.762 0.258 356 -0.3 4.98 6.54 AcceptableK-15 5.57 5.738 0.258 353 -0.7 4.96 6.52 Acceptable
Thyroid Stim HormoneuIU/mL (mIU/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT iK-C 2015
K-B 2015
K-A 2015
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 4 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
K-11 164 167.7 13.4 182 -0.3 127 208 AcceptableK-12 167 175.2 12.8 180 -0.6 136 214 AcceptableK-13 422 419.4 25.5 184 +0.1 342 496 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Vitamin B-12pg/mL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
K-20 6.53 6.673 0.371 397 -0.4 5.55 7.79 AcceptableK-21 9.05 8.973 0.477 395 +0.2 7.54 10.41 Acceptable
Prostate Specific Agng/mL (ug/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
K-20 1.60 1.529 0.077 151 +0.9 1.29 1.77 AcceptableK-21 0.92 0.912 0.038 149 +0.2 0.71 1.12 Acceptable
PSA, freeng/mL (ug/L)
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
K-C 2015K-B 2015K-A 2015
FOL-05 467 9 [20]FOL-06 301 9 [20]
RBC Folateng/mL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2K-B 2015K-A 2015
x: Result is outside the acceptable limits
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 5 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Subspecialty :7181660 General ImmunologyProficiency Event
2015 1
Regulated Analyte Test Event Score %
Proficiency Event2015 2
Proficiency Event2015 3 Cumulative CLIA
'88 PerformanceInterpretation
Current EventPerformanceInterpretationTest Event Score % Test Event Score %
CAP
CAP #:
Pending100S-A 100S-BAlpha-1-Antitrypsin Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BAlpha-Fetoprotein Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BAntinuclear Antibody Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BAntistreptolysin O Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Satisfactory100VM-A 100VM-C100VM-BAnti-HIV Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BComplement C3 Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BComplement C4 Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Satisfactory100VM-A 100VM-C100VM-BHepatitis (HBsAg) Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100VM-A 100VM-C100VM-BHepatitis (Anti-HBc) Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BIgA Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BIgG Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BIgE Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 80S-BIgM Successful <4>/ /55 4 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BRheumatoid Factor Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
Pending100S-A 100S-BRubella Successful <4>/ /55 5 5
General Immunology 75/75 100 74/75 99 20/20 Satisfactory Successful
<4> Scorecard performance pending future evaluation or may not be applicable due to discontinued testing or use of a waived method.
100
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 6 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Subspecialty :7181660 EndocrinologyProficiency Event
2015 1
Regulated Analyte Test Event Score %
Proficiency Event2015 2
Proficiency Event2015 3 Cumulative CLIA
'88 PerformanceInterpretation
Current EventPerformanceInterpretationTest Event Score % Test Event Score %
CAP
CAP #:
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BCortisol Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BThyroxine, Free (T4, Free) Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BhCG Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BTriiodothyronine (T3) Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BTSH Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Satisfactory100K-A 100K-C100K-BThyroxine (T4, Total) Successful/ / /555 5 5 5
Endocrinology 30/30 100 30/30 100 30/30 Satisfactory Successful100
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 7 of 7
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28010625
11/9/2015
12/11/2015
K-C 2015 Ligand Assay - GeneralE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
EVALUATIONORIGINAL
VR3-B 2015 Infectious Disease Serology
INSTITUTION:
ATTENTION:
CAP NUMBER:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasMedellin ANT CO 050034
KIT INFORMATION:12/10/201511/2/2015
Original Evaluation:
Kit#7181660-01 1
Kit Mailed:28004213 Kit ID:
Ana Velasquez
Next Mailing Date:
3/14/2016
COPIED TO: LAP CAP
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[26] = Educational challenge.[33] = Specimen determined to be unsatisfactory after contacting the CAP.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 3
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
CMV, IgGVR3-09 PRESENTABBOTT ARCHITECT i PRESENT Good
CMV, IgMVR3-09 PRESENTDIASORIN LIAISON PRESENT Good
EBV, VCA, IgGVR3-10OTHER ABSENT [26]
EBV, VCA, IgMVR3-10DIASORIN LIAISON ABSENT [26]
HSV I, IgGVR3-12 ABSENTOTHER ABSENT Good
HSVII, IgGVR3-12 PRESENTOTHER PRESENT Good
M pneu, IgGVR3-13 [33]
M pneu, IgMVR3-13 [33]
M pneu, Total AbVR3-13 [33]
Toxo, IgGVR3-15 ABSENTABBOTT ARCHITECT i ABSENT Good
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28004213
11/2/2015
12/10/2015
VR3-B 2015 Infectious Disease SerologyE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
TestMethod Specimen Your Result Intended Response Your Grade
Toxo, IgMVR3-15 ABSENTABBOTT ARCHITECT i ABSENT Good
VZV, IgGVR3-16 PRESENTBIOMERIEUX VIDAS/MINI PRESENT Good
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28004213
11/2/2015
12/10/2015
VR3-B 2015 Infectious Disease SerologyE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
EVALUATIONORIGINAL
VITD-B 2015 25-OH Vitamin D
INSTITUTION:
ATTENTION:
CAP NUMBER:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasMedellin ANT CO 050034
KIT INFORMATION:11/30/201511/2/2015
Original Evaluation:
Kit#7181660-01 1
Kit Mailed:28017888 Kit ID:
Ana Velasquez
Next Mailing Date:
4/25/2016
COPIED TO: LAP CAP
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:<NONE>
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 2
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
VITD-04 43.5 45.93 3.77 183 -0.6 34.6 57.3 AcceptableVITD-05 30.0 34.54 2.85 182 -1.6 25.9 43.1 AcceptableVITD-06 19.5 20.21 1.94 185 -0.4 14.3 26.1 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
25 OH Vitamin Dng/mL
DIASORIN LIAISON
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
VITD-B 2015VITD-A 2015
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 2
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28017888
11/2/2015
11/30/2015
VITD-B 2015 25-OH Vitamin DE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Page 1College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/Linearity
Executive Summary
Analyte Calibration Verification Linearity Evaluation Page #
Estradiol pg/mL Verified from 30.00 to 3129.00 (d) Linear from 30.00 to 1779.00 (d) 2 - 3FSH mIU/mL (IU/L) Verified from 2.55 to 169.15 (d) Linear from 2.55 to 169.15 (d) 4 - 5hCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Verified from 26.90 to 3164.60 Linear from 26.90 to 631.30 6 - 7
LH mIU/mL (U/L) Different Linear from 1.20 to 117.80 8 - 9Progesterone ng/mL Verified from 0.85 to 37.75 Linear from 0.85 to 37.75 10 - 11
Prolactin ng/mL (µg/L) Verified from 3.40 to 348.05 (d) Linear from 3.40 to 198.90 (d) 12 - 13*Testosterone ng/dL Verified from 25.770 to 1584.320 (d) Linear from 25.770 to 1216.900 (d) 14 - 15*
Note: For results of Different, see the Calibration Verification Troubleshooting Guide and Investigation Checklist.* This range does not include all reported specimens. Review your results to determine if excluded specimens reveal possible analytical problems.
(d) This evaluation result includes at least one diluted specimen.
Reviewed by_________________________________________ Date______________
Page 2College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityEstradiol pg/mL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 30.00 to 3129.00Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 15 pg/mL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
29.0 408.0 794.0
1019.01469.01749.03180.0
31.0 413.0 818.0
1103.01460.01809.03078.0
30.00 410.50 806.00
1061.001464.501779.003129.00
26.85 383.28 763.93 990.13
1342.931696.102888.16
60606060585856
3.15 pg/mL7.1%5.5%7.2%9.1%4.9%8.3%
± 15.00 pg/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
****
* Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 60
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 14LN8-08 - 13LN8-08 - 11
88.3 3.3 3.3
5.00.00.0
* LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity
*93.3 3.3
*1.70.0
*0.01.7
Page 3College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityEstradiol pg/mL Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 30.00 to 1779.00 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 925.17 pg/mL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
29.0 408.0 794.0
1019.01469.01749.03180.0
31.0 413.0 818.0
1103.01460.01809.03078.0
30.00 410.50 806.00
1061.001464.501779.003129.00
56.45 403.94 751.42
1098.911446.401793.88
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
****
* Diluted specimen § LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity.
§
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
500
1000
1500
Assa
y R
esul
t pg/
mL
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-200
-100
0
100
200
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne p
g/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your plot has one or more points within your linear range thatfall outside of the shaded area. Since your evaluation is Linear,no remedial action is necessary.Points can fall outside of the shaded area for two reasons: 1) an average is used to estimate imprecision, so many small differences can offset a few large differences, and 2) clinically insignificant nonlinearity (curved fit) can contribute to differences between your results and the best-fit straight line.Larger differences may be an early warning sign of nonlinearity,poor repeatability, or poor fit.
Page 4College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityFSH mIU/mL (IU/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 2.55 to 169.15Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 10% or 2 mIU/mL (IU/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
2.5 38.4 69.0
104.3145.9166.9
2.6 36.7 68.0
105.8142.9171.4
2.55 37.55 68.50
105.05144.40169.15
2.55 36.73 72.06
110.19139.81169.11
828383837874
0.00 mIU/mL2.2%-4.9%-4.7%3.3%0.0%
± 2.00 mIU/mL± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%
Note: mIU/mL is equivalent to IU/L.
** Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 50 100 150
-50
0
50
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆ ◆◆◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 83
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 13LN8-08 - 12LN8-09 - 13LN8-08 - 11
72.3 7.2 1.2 8.4
10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
59.015.7 1.219.3
0.01.20.00.0
0.00.00.03.6
Page 5College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityFSH mIU/mL (IU/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Evaluation Result: Linear from 2.55 to 144.40(extended to 169.15 with dilution)
Evaluation Type: Diluted/ExtendedGoal for Total Error (TE): 20%
Mean of Included Results: 71.61 mIU/mL (IU/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
2.5 38.4 69.0
104.3145.9166.9
2.6 36.7 68.0
105.8142.9171.4
2.55 37.55 68.50
105.05144.40169.15
1.37 36.49 71.61
106.73141.85176.97
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000*
* Diluted specimen
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
50
100
150
Assa
y R
esul
t mIU
/mL
(IU/L
)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
●●●●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-20
020
◆ ◆
◆ ◆
◆◆ ◆
◆◆
◆
●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne m
IU/m
L (IU
/L)
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 6.7% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 10% of Best-fit Target
Included in linear rangeLN8-13 4.5 169.15 176.97 -7.82 ± 17.70
Page 6College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityhCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 26.90 to 3164.60Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 5 mIU/mL (IU/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
26.2 144.6 268.8 387.4 501.6 608.0
3133.5
27.6 142.6 270.6 383.1 522.1 654.6
3195.7
26.90 143.60 269.70 385.25 511.85 631.30
3164.60
27.26 147.50 270.85 394.97 522.88 638.78
3255.77
82828282828181
-0.36 mIU/mL-2.6%-0.4%-2.5%-2.1%-1.2%-2.8%
± 5.00 mIU/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Note: mIU/mL is equivalent to IU/L.
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆◆ ◆ ◆
◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆
◆
◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 82
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 14LN8-08 - 13LN8-09 - 14LN8-08 - 12
96.3 0.0 1.2 1.2
1.20.00.00.0
* LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity
*97.6
* 1.2
*0.0
*0.0
*1.2
*0.0
Page 7College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityhCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 26.90 to 631.30 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 328.10 mIU/mL (IU/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
26.2 144.6 268.8 387.4 501.6 608.0
3133.5
27.6 142.6 270.6 383.1 522.1 654.6
3195.7
26.90 143.60 269.70 385.25 511.85 631.30
3164.60
25.08146.29267.50388.70509.91631.12
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
§ LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity.
§
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Assa
y R
esul
t mIU
/mL
(IU/L
)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-50
0
50
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne m
IU/m
L (IU
/L)
Relative Concentration
◆◆
◆◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 8College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityLH mIU/mL (U/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: DifferentPeer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 10% or 3 mIU/mL (U/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
1.2 24.5 46.8 72.6 96.3
119.7
1.2 25.8 44.2 71.3 95.2
115.9
1.20 25.15 45.50 71.95 95.75
117.80
1.38 28.58 55.36 82.91
108.00134.26
737373737373
-0.18 mIU/mL-3.43 mIU/mL
-17.8%-13.2%-11.3%-12.3%
± 3.00 mIU/mL± 3.00 mIU/mL
± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%
Note: mIU/mL is equivalent to U/L.
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 73
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 13LN8-08 - 11
86.3 2.7
11.0 0.0
98.6 1.4
0.00.0
0.00.0
Page 9College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityLH mIU/mL (U/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 1.20 to 117.80 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 20%Mean of Included Results: 59.56 mIU/mL (U/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
1.2 24.5 46.8 72.6 96.3
119.7
1.2 25.8 44.2 71.3 95.2
115.9
1.20 25.15 45.50 71.95 95.75
117.80
0.90 24.36 47.83 71.29 94.75
118.22
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Assa
y R
esul
t mIU
/mL
(U/L
)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-10
-5
0
5
10
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne m
IU/m
L (U
/L)
Relative Concentration
◆ ◆
◆
◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 10College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityProgesterone ng/mL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 0.85 to 37.75Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 1 ng/mL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
0.9 9.1
17.325.237.8
0.8 8.7
17.725.637.7
> 40.0 > 40.0
0.85 8.90
17.5025.4037.75
0.91 9.43
18.5428.4135.6639.12
646464645640
-0.06 ng/mL-5.6%-5.6%
-10.6%5.9%
± 1.00 ng/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 10 20 30
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆
◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 64
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 13LN8-08 - 12LN8-08 - 11
39.126.618.8
12.5 1.6 1.6
20.348.429.7
0.00.00.0
0.00.01.6
Page 11College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityProgesterone ng/mL Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 0.85 to 37.75 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 18.08 ng/mL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
0.9 9.1
17.325.237.8
0.8 8.7
17.725.637.7
> 40.0 > 40.0
0.85 8.9017.5025.4037.75
0.02 9.05
18.0827.1136.14
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
10
20
30
Assa
y R
esul
t ng/
mL
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-4
-2
0
2
4
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Your plot has one or more points within your linear range thatfall outside of the shaded area. Since your evaluation is Linear,no remedial action is necessary.Points can fall outside of the shaded area for two reasons: 1) an average is used to estimate imprecision, so many small differences can offset a few large differences, and 2) clinically insignificant nonlinearity (curved fit) can contribute to differences between your results and the best-fit straight line.Larger differences may be an early warning sign of nonlinearity,poor repeatability, or poor fit.
Page 12College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityProlactin ng/mL (µg/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 3.40 to 348.05Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 3 ng/mL (µg/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
3.4 55.3
112.2163.5194.7233.0341.1
3.4 55.2
108.9168.3203.1236.9355.0
3.40 55.25
110.55165.90198.90234.95348.05
3.39 54.17
109.43165.54199.77247.09360.73
78797979757573
0.01 ng/mL2.0%1.0%0.2%-0.4%-4.9%-3.5%
± 3.00 ng/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Note: ng/mL is equivalent to µg/L.
***
* Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 100 200 300
-50
0
50
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆ ◆ ◆◆ ◆
◆ ◆◆ ◆
◆ ◆ ◆◆
◆◆◆ ◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 79
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 14LN8-08 - 13LN8-09 - 14LN8-08 - 12LN8-09 - 13LN8-08 - 11
67.1 3.8 1.3 3.8 0.0 5.1
17.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3
* LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity
*65.8
* 5.1 1.326.6
*0.0
*0.00.00.0
*1.3
*0.00.00.0
Page 13College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityProlactin ng/mL (µg/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Evaluation Result: Linear from 3.40 to 165.90(extended to 198.90 with dilution)
Evaluation Type: Diluted/ExtendedGoal for Total Error (TE): 25%
Mean of Included Results: 83.78 ng/mL (µg/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13LN8-14
3.4 55.3
112.2163.5194.7233.0341.1
3.4 55.2
108.9168.3203.1236.9355.0
3.40 55.25
110.55165.90198.90234.95348.05
2.35 56.63
110.92165.20219.48273.76
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
***
* Diluted specimen § LN8-14 is not evaluated for linearity.
§
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Assa
y R
esul
t ng/
mL
(µg/
L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-60
-40
-20
020
4060
◆◆
◆◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L (µ
g/L)
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 8.3% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 12.5% of Best-fit Target
Included in linear rangeLN8-12 8.4 198.90 219.48 -20.58 ± 27.44Excluded: Diff. exceeds allowable errorLN8-13 3.9 234.95 273.76 -38.81 ± 34.22
Page 14College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityTestosterone ng/dL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 25.770 to 1584.320Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 10 ng/dL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
26.53 289.55 574.49 881.92
1196.281566.01
25.01 293.01 532.96 825.111237.521602.63
25.770 291.280 553.725 853.515
1216.9001584.320
22.174 285.058 545.670 822.510
1115.5641412.116
585858585451
3.596 ng/dL2.2%1.5%3.8%9.1%
12.2%
± 10.000 ng/dL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
**
* Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆
◆◆◆◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 58
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN8-08 - 13LN8-08 - 12LN8-08 - 11
75.9 8.6 6.9
6.91.70.0
77.613.8 8.6
0.00.00.0
0.00.00.0
Page 15College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017235Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
09/28/201511/02/201504/04/2016
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN8-B 2015 Reproductive Endocrinology Calibration Verification/LinearityTestosterone ng/dL Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Evaluation Result: Linear from 25.770 to 853.515(extended to 1216.900 with dilution)
Evaluation Type: Diluted/ExtendedGoal for Total Error (TE): 25%
Mean of Included Results: 431.072 ng/dL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN8-08LN8-09LN8-10LN8-11LN8-12LN8-13
26.53 289.55 574.49 881.92
1196.281566.01
25.01 293.01 532.96 825.11
1237.521602.63
25.770 291.280 553.725 853.515
1216.9001584.320
19.221 293.788 568.356 842.924
1117.4921392.060
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
**
* Diluted specimen
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
500
1000
1500
Assa
y R
esul
t ng/
dL
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-200
020
0
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diff
eren
ce fr
om B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/dL
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 8.3% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 12.5% of Best-fit Target
Included in linear rangeLN8-12 41.24 1216.900 1117.493 99.407 ± 139.687Excluded: Diff. exceeds allowable errorLN8-13 36.62 1584.320 1392.061 192.259 ± 174.008
EV
AL
UA
TIO
NO
RIG
INA
L
Y-B
201
5
Lig
and-
Spec
ial
INST
ITU
TIO
N:
AT
TE
NT
ION
:
CA
P N
UM
BE
R:
Labo
rato
rio M
edic
o La
s A
mer
icas
Med
ellin
AN
T C
O 0
5003
4
KIT
IN
FO
RM
AT
ION
:10
/28/
2015
9/21
/201
5
Ori
gina
l Eva
luat
ion:
Kit
#71
8166
0-01
1
Kit
Mai
led:
2800
3528
Kit
ID
:
Ana
Vel
asqu
ez
Nex
t Mai
ling
Dat
e:
4/25
/201
6
CO
PIE
D T
O:
LAP
C
AP
LE
GE
ND
:E
xcep
tion
Rea
son
Cod
es a
ppea
ring
in th
is e
valu
atio
n:[2
0]=
No
appr
opria
te ta
rget
/res
pons
e ca
nnot
be
grad
ed.
[26]
= E
duca
tiona
l cha
lleng
e.
Rev
iew
ed B
yD
ate
0001
The
Col
lege
of
Am
eric
an P
atho
logi
sts
reco
mm
ends
that
the
resu
lt of
this
inte
rlabo
rato
ry c
ompa
rison
not
be
used
as
a so
le c
riter
ion
for j
udgi
ng th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f an
y in
divi
dual
clin
ical
labo
rato
ry.
Page
1 o
f 5
Eva
luat
ion
and
Com
para
tive
Met
hod
Stat
isti
cs
Spec
imen
Mea
n
Your
Res
ult
S.D
.
No.
of
Lab
sL
ower
S.D
.IU
pper
Your
Gra
deL
imit
s of
Acc
epta
bilit
y
Y-0
424
7.8
252.
7212
.13
72-0
.421
6.3
289.
1A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
113.
711
5.63
6.50
73-0
.396
.113
5.2
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
658
6.0
585.
3225
.93
720.
050
7.5
663.
2A
ccep
tabl
e
Tes
tU
nit o
f M
easu
reP
eer
Gro
up
DH
EA
Sul
fate
ug/d
LA
BB
OT
T A
RC
HIT
EC
T i
Plo
t of
the
Rel
ativ
e D
ista
nce
of Y
our
Res
ults
from
Tar
get a
s P
erce
ntag
es o
f al
low
ed D
evia
tion
Surv
ey-1
00--
----
----
--M
ean-
----
----
--+
100
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
462
361
6.4
23.8
166
+0.
354
468
8A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
179
179.
06.
616
60.
015
919
9A
ccep
tabl
eY
-06
1641
1591
.156
.315
2+
0.9
1422
1761
Acc
epta
ble
Est
radi
olpg
/mL
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
422
.220
.64
0.94
205
+1.
717
.823
.5A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
11.3
10.4
40.
4520
5+
1.9
9.0
11.9
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
663
.162
.92
2.69
204
+0.
154
.871
.0A
ccep
tabl
e
FSH m
IU/m
L (I
U/L
)A
BB
OT
T A
RC
HIT
EC
T i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
46.
76.
390.
1916
+1.
75.
87.
0A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
9.0
8.75
0.31
16+
0.8
7.8
9.7
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
617
.716
.78
0.51
16+
1.8
15.2
18.4
Acc
epta
ble
Gro
wth
Hor
mon
eng
/mL
(ug/
L)B
EC
KM
AN
AC
CE
SS/2
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
464
8.0
8[2
0]Y
-05
215.
08
[20]
Y-0
615
67.0
8[2
0]
17-H
ydro
xypr
oges
tero
neng
/dL
DIA
GN
STC
SY
S E
IA/E
LISA
0001
The
Col
lege
of
Am
eric
an P
atho
logi
sts
reco
mm
ends
that
the
resu
lt of
this
inte
rlabo
rato
ry c
ompa
rison
not
be
used
as
a so
le c
riter
ion
for j
udgi
ng th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f an
y in
divi
dual
clin
ical
labo
rato
ry.
Page
2 o
f 5
CA
P N
umbe
r:In
stit
utio
n:
Att
enti
on:
Cit
y /
Stat
e:
Labo
rato
rio M
edic
o La
s A
mer
icas
Ana
Vel
asqu
ezM
edel
lin A
NT
CO
050
034
7181
660-
01 K
it#
1 K
it I
D:
Kit
Mai
led:
Ori
gina
l Eva
luat
ion:
2800
3528
9/21
/201
5
10/2
8/20
15
Y-B
201
5
Lig
and-
Spec
ial
E V
A L
U A
T I
O N
OR
IGIN
AL
Eva
luat
ion
and
Com
para
tive
Met
hod
Stat
isti
cs
Spec
imen
Mea
n
Your
Res
ult
S.D
.
No.
of
Lab
sL
ower
S.D
.IU
pper
Your
Gra
deL
imit
s of
Acc
epta
bilit
y
Y-0
46.
310
.33
3.36
32-1
.20.
220
.5A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
27.4
31.7
25.
5041
-0.8
15.2
48.3
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
627
.329
.12
5.86
41-0
.311
.546
.8A
ccep
tabl
e
Tes
tU
nit o
f M
easu
reP
eer
Gro
up
IGF
-1ng
/mL
DIA
SOR
IN L
IAIS
ON
Plo
t of
the
Rel
ativ
e D
ista
nce
of Y
our
Res
ults
from
Tar
get a
s P
erce
ntag
es o
f al
low
ed D
evia
tion
Surv
ey-1
00--
----
----
--M
ean-
----
----
--+
100
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-0
419
.419
.40
1.02
193
0.0
16.3
22.5
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
510
.69.
990.
4519
3+
1.4
8.6
11.4
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
654
.653
.04
2.54
191
+0.
645
.460
.7A
ccep
tabl
e
Lut
eini
zing
Hor
mon
em
IU/m
L (U
/L)
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
4Y
-05
Y-0
6
Y-0
48.
38.
430.
5815
1-0
.26.
610
.2A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
5.7
5.71
0.38
151
0.0
4.5
6.9
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
620
.120
.17
1.44
151
-0.1
15.8
24.5
Acc
epta
ble
Pro
gest
eron
eng
/mL
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Met
hod/
ng/m
L
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
444
.641
.82
3.12
196
+0.
932
.451
.2A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
14.0
12.5
41.
0019
5+
1.5
9.5
15.6
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
611
4.8
102.
3210
.23
195
+1.
271
.613
3.1
Acc
epta
ble
Pro
lact
inng
/mL
(ug/
L)A
BB
OT
T A
RC
HIT
EC
T i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
0001
The
Col
lege
of
Am
eric
an P
atho
logi
sts
reco
mm
ends
that
the
resu
lt of
this
inte
rlabo
rato
ry c
ompa
rison
not
be
used
as
a so
le c
riter
ion
for j
udgi
ng th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f an
y in
divi
dual
clin
ical
labo
rato
ry.
Page
3 o
f 5
CA
P N
umbe
r:In
stit
utio
n:
Att
enti
on:
Cit
y /
Stat
e:
Labo
rato
rio M
edic
o La
s A
mer
icas
Ana
Vel
asqu
ezM
edel
lin A
NT
CO
050
034
7181
660-
01 K
it#
1 K
it I
D:
Kit
Mai
led:
Ori
gina
l Eva
luat
ion:
2800
3528
9/21
/201
5
10/2
8/20
15
Y-B
201
5
Lig
and-
Spec
ial
E V
A L
U A
T I
O N
OR
IGIN
AL
Eva
luat
ion
and
Com
para
tive
Met
hod
Stat
isti
cs
Spec
imen
Mea
n
Your
Res
ult
S.D
.
No.
of
Lab
sL
ower
S.D
.IU
pper
Your
Gra
deL
imit
s of
Acc
epta
bilit
y
Y-0
425
0.8
246.
5213
.47
172
+0.
320
6.1
287.
0A
ccep
tabl
eY
-05
61.9
63.1
93.
7717
2-0
.351
.874
.6A
ccep
tabl
eY
-06
750.
273
9.75
42.5
117
0+
0.2
612.
286
7.3
Acc
epta
ble
Tes
tU
nit o
f M
easu
reP
eer
Gro
up
Tes
tost
eron
eng
/dL
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Plo
t of
the
Rel
ativ
e D
ista
nce
of Y
our
Res
ults
from
Tar
get a
s P
erce
ntag
es o
f al
low
ed D
evia
tion
Surv
ey-1
00--
----
----
--M
ean-
----
----
--+
100
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
49.
609.
471
0.55
052
+0.
27.
8211
.13
Acc
epta
ble
Y-0
526
.30
27.2
891.
679
52-0
.622
.25
32.3
3A
ccep
tabl
eY
-06
36.5
034
.584
2.28
852
+0.
827
.72
41.4
5A
ccep
tabl
e
SHB
G n
mol
/Lnm
ol/L
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
Y-0
416
7.0
212.
3667
.43
129
-0.7
[26]
Y-0
521
.934
.02
11.1
212
5-1
.1[2
6]Y
-06
328.
034
5.33
87.2
013
0-0
.2[2
6]
Tes
tost
er,b
ioav
lng
/dL
CA
LC T
T+
SHB
G &
/OR
ALB
Y-0
410
.24
[20]
Y-0
51.
94
[20]
Y-0
622
.04
[20]
Tes
tost
eron
e, fr
eepg
/mL
DIA
GN
STC
SY
S E
IA/E
LISA
ING
-04
1054
.810
04.1
133
.00
120
+1.
590
5.1
1103
.1A
ccep
tabl
eIN
G-0
591
.891
.56
4.16
123
+0.
179
.010
4.1
Acc
epta
ble
ING
-06
265.
826
8.45
8.67
120
-0.3
242.
429
4.5
Acc
epta
ble
Insu
linpm
ol/L
AB
BO
TT
AR
CH
ITE
CT
i
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
0001
The
Col
lege
of
Am
eric
an P
atho
logi
sts
reco
mm
ends
that
the
resu
lt of
this
inte
rlabo
rato
ry c
ompa
rison
not
be
used
as
a so
le c
riter
ion
for j
udgi
ng th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f an
y in
divi
dual
clin
ical
labo
rato
ry.
Page
4 o
f 5
CA
P N
umbe
r:In
stit
utio
n:
Att
enti
on:
Cit
y /
Stat
e:
Labo
rato
rio M
edic
o La
s A
mer
icas
Ana
Vel
asqu
ezM
edel
lin A
NT
CO
050
034
7181
660-
01 K
it#
1 K
it I
D:
Kit
Mai
led:
Ori
gina
l Eva
luat
ion:
2800
3528
9/21
/201
5
10/2
8/20
15
Y-B
201
5
Lig
and-
Spec
ial
E V
A L
U A
T I
O N
OR
IGIN
AL
Eva
luat
ion
and
Com
para
tive
Met
hod
Stat
isti
cs
Spec
imen
Mea
n
Your
Res
ult
S.D
.
No.
of
Lab
sL
ower
S.D
.IU
pper
Your
Gra
deL
imit
s of
Acc
epta
bilit
y
ING
-04
282.
126
4.27
14.9
997
+1.
221
9.2
309.
3A
ccep
tabl
eIN
G-0
512
.212
.65
0.83
98-0
.510
.115
.2A
ccep
tabl
eIN
G-0
673
.371
.82
4.79
97+
0.3
57.4
86.2
Acc
epta
ble
Tes
tU
nit o
f M
easu
reP
eer
Gro
up
Par
athy
roid
Hor
mon
e IO
pg/m
LB
EC
KM
AN
AC
CE
SS/2
Plo
t of
the
Rel
ativ
e D
ista
nce
of Y
our
Res
ults
from
Tar
get a
s P
erce
ntag
es o
f al
low
ed D
evia
tion
Surv
ey-1
00--
----
----
--M
ean-
----
----
--+
100
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
Y-B
201
4
RA
P-0
446
.70
47.5
374.
794
38-0
.233
.15
61.9
3A
ccep
tabl
eR
AP
-05
12.0
011
.250
1.55
938
+0.
56.
5715
.93
Acc
epta
ble
RA
P-0
65.
354.
911
1.17
237
+0.
41.
398.
43A
ccep
tabl
e
Ald
oste
rone
ng/d
LD
IASO
RIN
LIA
ISO
N
Y-B
201
5Y-
A 2
015
RA
P-0
420
0.5
226.
6316
.69
10-1
.617
6.5
276.
7A
ccep
tabl
eR
AP
-05
75.3
81.7
56.
2710
-1.0
62.9
100.
6A
ccep
tabl
eR
AP
-06
42.1
43.7
54.
3110
-0.4
30.8
56.7
Acc
epta
ble
Ren
in uU/m
LD
IASO
RIN
-CLI
N A
SSA
YS
Y-B
201
5
0001
The
Col
lege
of
Am
eric
an P
atho
logi
sts
reco
mm
ends
that
the
resu
lt of
this
inte
rlabo
rato
ry c
ompa
rison
not
be
used
as
a so
le c
riter
ion
for j
udgi
ng th
e pe
rfor
man
ce o
f an
y in
divi
dual
clin
ical
labo
rato
ry.
Page
5 o
f 5
CA
P N
umbe
r:In
stit
utio
n:
Att
enti
on:
Cit
y /
Stat
e:
Labo
rato
rio M
edic
o La
s A
mer
icas
Ana
Vel
asqu
ezM
edel
lin A
NT
CO
050
034
7181
660-
01 K
it#
1 K
it I
D:
Kit
Mai
led:
Ori
gina
l Eva
luat
ion:
2800
3528
9/21
/201
5
10/2
8/20
15
Y-B
201
5
Lig
and-
Spec
ial
E V
A L
U A
T I
O N
OR
IGIN
AL
EVALUATIONORIGINAL
TM-B 2015 Tumor Markers
INSTITUTION:
ATTENTION:
CAP NUMBER:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasMedellin ANT CO 050034
KIT INFORMATION:8/19/20157/20/2015
Original Evaluation:
Kit#7181660-01 1
Kit Mailed:28016325 Kit ID:
Ana Velasquez
Next Mailing Date:
1/18/2016
COPIED TO: LAP CAP
LEGEND: Exception Reason Codes appearing in this evaluation:[20] = No appropriate target/response cannot be graded.
Reviewed By Date
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 1 of 3
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
TM-04 19.3 28.21 9.66 10 -0.9 0.0 57.2 AcceptableTM-05 12.6 18.50 5.60 10 -1.1 1.6 35.4 AcceptableTM-06 29.0 40.75 13.43 10 -0.9 0.4 81.1 Acceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
ACTHpg/mL
DIASORIN
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
TM-B 2015
TM-04 1.3 7 [20]TM-05 0.5 5 [20]TM-06 3.1 7 [20]
Beta-2-microglobulinug/mL (mg/L)
DIASORIN LIAISON
TM-04 66.6 61.74 2.83 202 +1.7 53.2 70.3 AcceptableTM-05 21.0 18.63 1.03 203 +2.3 15.5 21.8 AcceptableTM-06 185.9 169.89 7.08 202 +2.3 148.6 191.2 Acceptable
CA 125U/mL
ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
TM-B 2015TM-A 2015TM-B 2014
TM-04 21.1 20.85 1.12 11 +0.2 17.4 24.3 AcceptableTM-05 8.8 8.83 0.71 12 0.0 6.6 11.0 AcceptableTM-06 37.8 40.03 2.97 12 -0.8 31.1 49.0 Acceptable
CA 15-3U/mL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
TM-B 2015TM-A 2015TM-B 2014
TM-04 48.8 8 [20]TM-05 23.0 8 [20]TM-06 275.3 8 [20]
CA 19-9U/mL
OTHER
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 2 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28016325
7/20/2015
8/19/2015
TM-B 2015 Tumor MarkersE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Evaluation and Comparative Method Statistics
Specimen Mean
YourResult S.D.
No. ofLabs LowerS.D.I Upper
YourGrade
Limits of Acceptability
TM-04 27.4 33.72 1.74 38 -3.6 28.5 39.0 UnacceptableTM-05 7.4 8.74 0.47 39 -2.9 7.3 10.2 AcceptableTM-06 45.4 55.33 2.85 38 -3.5 46.7 63.9 Unacceptable
TestUnit of Measure
Peer Group
Thyroglobulinng/mL
BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Plot of the Relative Distance of Your Results from Target as Percentages of allowed Deviation
Survey -100------------Mean-----------+100
TM-B 2015TM-A 2015TM-B 2014
x: Result is outside the acceptable limits
0001
The College of American Pathologists recommends that the result of this interlaboratory comparison not be used as a sole criterion for judging the performance of any individual clinical laboratory.
Page 3 of 3
CAP Number:Institution:
Attention:City / State:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin ANT CO 050034
7181660-01 Kit# 1 Kit ID: Kit Mailed:
Original Evaluation:
28016325
7/20/2015
8/19/2015
TM-B 2015 Tumor MarkersE V A L U A T I O N
ORIGINAL
Page 1College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/Linearity
Executive Summary
Analyte Calibration Verification Linearity Evaluation Page #
AFP ng/mL (µg/L) *** Linear from 1.00 to 807.05 2CEA ng/mL (µg/L) Verified from 0.55 to 725.30 Linear from 0.55 to 725.30 3 - 4
Cortisol µg/dL Verified from 1.05 to 58.65 Linear from 1.05 to 58.65 5 - 6Ferritin ng/mL (µg/L) Verified from 3.90 to 1976.60 (d) Linear from 3.90 to 1976.60 (d) 7 - 8
Folate ng/mL Different Linear from 0.240 to 5.850 9 - 10hCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Verified from 9.30 to 6145.85 Linear from 9.30 to 693.95 11 - 12
Triiodothyronine T3 ng/dL Verified from 50.40 to 532.45 Linear from 50.40 to 532.45 13 - 14* *Thyroxine (Total) T4 µg/dL Verified from 1.05 to 26.00 (d) Linear from 1.05 to 19.90 15 - 16*
TSH µIU/mL (mIU/L) Verified from 0.0230 to 87.1240 Linear from 0.0230 to 87.1240 17 - 18Vitamin B-12 pg/mL Verified from 86.5 to 1321.5 Imprecise 19 - 21
Note: For results of Different, see the Calibration Verification Troubleshooting Guide and Investigation Checklist.* This range does not include all reported specimens. Review your results to determine if excluded specimens reveal possible analytical problems.
*** No Peer Group(d) This evaluation result includes at least one diluted specimen.
Reviewed by_________________________________________ Date______________
Page 2College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityAFP ng/mL (µg/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2Evaluation Result: Linear from 1.00 to 807.05 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 394.47 ng/mL (µg/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
1.0161.1313.2464.8627.9804.1
1.0157.1312.6462.6618.2810.0
1.00159.10312.90463.70623.05807.05
< 0155.63314.85474.08633.31792.53
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
200
400
600
800
Assa
y Re
sult
ng/m
L (µ
g/L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-100
-50
0
50
100
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L (µ
g/L)
Relative Concentration
◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆
◆◆
◆
◆◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 3College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityCEA ng/mL (µg/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 0.55 to 725.30Peer Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 2.3 ng/mL (µg/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.5140.3283.0426.5601.6736.0
0.6138.4281.3426.7569.3714.6
0.55139.35282.15426.60585.45725.30
0.60139.56279.39414.12564.89717.28
131313131313
-0.05 ng/mL-0.2%1.0%3.0%3.6%1.1%
± 2.30 ng/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Note: ng/mL is equivalent to µg/L.
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 200 400 600
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆
◆ ◆◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆◆
◆ ◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 13
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06 92.3 7.7 100.0 0.0 0.0
Page 4College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityCEA ng/mL (µg/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2Evaluation Result: Linear from 0.55 to 725.30 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 359.90 ng/mL (µg/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.5140.3283.0426.5601.6736.0
0.6138.4281.3426.7569.3714.6
0.55139.35282.15426.60585.45725.30
< 0141.05286.95432.85578.75724.65
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
200
400
600
Assa
y Re
sult
ng/m
L (µ
g/L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-50
0
50
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L (µ
g/L)
Relative Concentration
◆◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆ ◆
◆ ◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 5College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityCortisol µg/dL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 1.05 to 58.65Peer Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 1 µg/dL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
1.015.229.343.560.5
1.115.329.342.656.8
> 62.3 > 62.3
1.0515.2529.3043.0558.65
1.0215.1029.2743.5756.5568.36
171717171611
0.03 µg/dL1.0%0.1%-1.2%3.7%
± 1.00 µg/dL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 10 20 30 40 50
-100
-50
0
50
100
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆◆ ◆ ◆
◆◆
◆ ◆ ◆◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 17
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 05LN5-01 - 04
47.141.2 5.9
5.90.00.0
64.729.4 5.9
0.00.00.0
0.00.00.0
Page 6College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityCortisol µg/dL Linearity Evaluation
Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2Evaluation Result: Linear from 1.05 to 58.65 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 29.46 µg/dL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
1.015.229.343.560.5
1.115.329.342.656.8
> 62.3 > 62.3
1.0515.2529.3043.0558.65
0.8615.1629.4643.7658.06
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Assa
y Re
sult
µg/d
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
-5
0
5
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne µ
g/dL
Relative Concentration
◆ ◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆ ◆◆
◆ ◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Your plot has one or more points within your linear range thatfall outside of the shaded area. Since your evaluation is Linear,no remedial action is necessary.Points can fall outside of the shaded area for two reasons: 1) an average is used to estimate imprecision, so many small differences can offset a few large differences, and 2) clinically insignificant nonlinearity (curved fit) can contribute to differences between your results and the best-fit straight line.Larger differences may be an early warning sign of nonlinearity,poor repeatability, or poor fit.
Page 7College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityFerritin ng/mL (µg/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 3.90 to 1976.60Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 15% or 16.5 ng/mL (µg/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
4.1 370.8 706.3
1167.71689.41947.0
3.7 374.2 759.21141.81679.82006.2
3.90 372.50 732.75
1154.751684.601976.60
3.26 356.45 709.88
1127.971600.881871.80
116118118118118 90
0.64 ng/mL4.5%3.2%2.4%5.2%5.6%
± 16.50 ng/mL± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%
Note: ng/mL is equivalent to µg/L.
** Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 500 1000 1500
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆
◆◆◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 118
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 05LN5-02 - 06LN5-01 - 04
66.122.0 0.8 3.4
6.80.00.80.0
56.818.6 1.718.6
0.00.80.00.0
0.02.50.00.8
Page 8College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityFerritin ng/mL (µg/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Evaluation Result: Linear from 3.90 to 1684.60(extended to 1976.60 with dilution)
Evaluation Type: Diluted/ExtendedGoal for Total Error (TE): 30% (25% for Linearity)
Mean of Included Results: 789.70 ng/mL (µg/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
4.1 370.8 706.3
1167.71689.41947.0
3.7 374.2 759.2
1141.81679.82006.2
3.90 372.50 732.75
1154.751684.601976.60
< 0 375.33 789.70
1204.071618.432032.80
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000*
* Diluted specimen
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Assa
y Re
sult
ng/m
L (µ
g/L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
●●●●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-400
-200
020
040
0
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆
◆
◆
●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L (µ
g/L)
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 8.3% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 12.5% of Best-fit Target
Included in linear rangeLN5-06 59.2 1976.60 2032.80 -56.20 ± 254.10
Page 9College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityFolate ng/mL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: DifferentPeer Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Allowable Error: 15% or 0.3 ng/mL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.481.582.693.524.785.83
0.001.372.633.644.895.87
0.2401.4752.6603.5804.8355.850
0.806 4.021 7.028 9.476
12.44314.846
272929292929
-0.566 ng/mL-63.3%-62.2%-62.2%-61.1%-60.6%
± 0.300 ng/mL± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
-100
-50
0
50
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆
◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆◆ ◆ ◆ ◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 29
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-02 - 06LN5-01 - 04
58.620.7 0.0
17.2 3.4 0.0
89.7 6.9 3.4
0.00.00.0
0.00.00.0
Page 10College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityFolate ng/mL Linearity Evaluation
Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2Evaluation Result: Linear from 0.240 to 5.850 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 30% (25% for Linearity)Mean of Included Results: 3.107 ng/mL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.481.582.693.524.785.83
0.001.372.633.644.895.87
0.2401.4752.6603.5804.8355.850
0.3171.4332.5493.6654.7805.896
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Assa
y Re
sult
ng/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Your plot has one or more points within your linear range thatfall outside of the shaded area. Since your evaluation is Linear,no remedial action is necessary.Points can fall outside of the shaded area for two reasons: 1) an average is used to estimate imprecision, so many small differences can offset a few large differences, and 2) clinically insignificant nonlinearity (curved fit) can contribute to differences between your results and the best-fit straight line.Larger differences may be an early warning sign of nonlinearity,poor repeatability, or poor fit.
Page 11College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityhCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 9.30 to 6145.85Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 12 mIU/mL (IU/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06LN5-07LN5-08
9.6 152.3 282.3 418.8 543.6 684.5
3408.96056.6
9.0 157.3 287.3 421.6 554.4 703.4
3474.66235.1
9.30 154.80 284.80 420.20 549.00 693.953441.756145.85
7.74 144.28 279.39 413.48 545.75 678.69
3392.386117.43
115115115115115115115115
1.56 mIU/mL7.3%1.9%1.6%0.6%2.2%1.5%0.5%
± 12.00 mIU/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Note: mIU/mL is equivalent to IU/L.
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆
◆
◆◆◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆◆◆ ◆ ◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 115
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 08LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 04
96.5 0.9 1.7
0.90.00.0
*LN5-07 and LN5-08 are not evaluated for linearity
*99.1 0.9
*0.00.0
*0.00.0
Page 12College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityhCG mIU/mL (IU/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 9.30 to 693.95 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 352.01 mIU/mL (IU/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06LN5-07LN5-08
9.6 152.3 282.3 418.8 543.6 684.5
3408.96056.6
9.0 157.3 287.3 421.6 554.4 703.4
3474.66235.1
9.30 154.80 284.80 420.20 549.00 693.95
3441.756145.85
13.35148.81284.28419.74555.20690.67
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
§ Not evaluated for linearity.
§§
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
200
400
600
Assa
y Re
sult
mIU
/mL
(IU/L
)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-50
0
50
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne m
IU/m
L (IU
/L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆◆◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 13College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityTriiodothyronine T3 ng/dL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 50.40 to 532.45 Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 20 ng/dL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
49.5 250.4 397.4 557.7 920.8
1155.1
51.3 253.7 393.7 507.2 943.61331.3
50.40 252.05 395.55 532.45 932.20
1243.20
52.88271.94448.21586.74725.82784.40
646464503835
-2.48 ng/dL-7.3%
-11.7%-9.3%28.4%58.5%
± 20.00 ng/dL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
**
* Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
200 400 600 800
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆ ◆◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 64
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 05LN5-01 - 04
Other
18.8 4.712.515.6
29.7 1.610.9 6.3
30.014.010.0 0.0
8.04.08.00.0
8.0 0.018.0 0.0
Page 14College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityTriiodothyronine T3 ng/dL Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 50.40 to 532.45 Evaluation Type: Diluted/Extended
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 307.61 ng/dL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
49.5 250.4 397.4 557.7 920.8
1155.1
51.3 253.7 393.7 507.2 943.6
1331.3
50.40 252.05 395.55 532.45 932.20
1243.20
69.16228.13387.10546.06705.03863.99
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
**
* Diluted specimen
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Assa
y Re
sult
ng/d
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-400
-200
020
040
0
◆
◆ ◆ ◆◆
◆◆
◆
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne n
g/dL
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 8.3% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 12.5% of Best-fit Target
Excluded: Diff. exceeds allowable errorLN5-05 22.8 932.20 705.03 227.17 ± 88.13Not evaluated: Previous spec. excludedLN5-06 176.2 1243.20 863.99 ----- -----
Page 15College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityThyroxine (Total) T4 µg/dL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 1.05 to 26.00Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 10% or 0.5 µg/dL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06LN5-07
1.0 6.0
12.519.820.125.4
1.1 5.9
13.020.021.026.6
> 48.0 > 48.0
1.05 5.95
12.7519.9020.5526.00
1.30 6.14
13.2320.1122.1827.1986.09
537272705441 9
-0.25 µg/dL-3.1%-3.6%-1.0%-7.3%-4.4%
± 0.50 µg/dL± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%± 10.0%
**
* Diluted specimen
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
5 10 15 20 25
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆
◆
◆
Not DilutedDiluted
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 72
Calibration Verification Linearity Evaluation
Range % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % ImpreciseLN5-01 - 07LN5-01 - 06LN5-02 - 07LN5-01 - 05LN5-02 - 06LN5-01 - 04LN5-02 - 05
Other
1.416.7 2.8
18.1 4.2
19.411.1 5.6
0.08.30.02.82.82.81.42.8
* LN5-07 is not evaluated for linearity
*10.6
* 4.5 3.0
24.212.1 0.0
*1.5
*6.11.57.60.00.0
* 6.1
* 0.0 3.0
16.7 3.0 0.0
Page 16College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityThyroxine (Total) T4 µg/dL Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 1.05 to 19.90 Evaluation Type: Diluted/Extended
Goal for Total Error (TE): 20%Mean of Included Results: 9.91 µg/dL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06LN5-07
1.0 6.0
12.519.820.125.4
1.1 5.9
13.020.021.026.6
> 48.0 > 48.0
1.05 5.9512.7519.9020.5526.00
0.41 6.74
13.0819.4225.7532.09
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
**
* Diluted specimen
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Assa
y Re
sult
µg/d
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆ ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-6-4
-20
24
6
◆
◆ ◆
◆◆
◆
◆
◆
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
Relative Concentration
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne µ
g/dL
Best-fit lineExtended line
◆
●
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Diluted & Included in best-fit lineDiluted & Excluded from best-fit line
Your Diluted Specimen(s) Analysis
SpecimenReplicateDifference 1 Your Mean
Best-fitTarget
DifferenceFrom Target 2
AllowableError Evaluation
1 Limit for replicate difference = 6.7% of Best-fit Target2 Allowable Error = 10% of Best-fit Target
Excluded: Diff. exceeds allowable errorLN5-05 0.9 20.55 25.75 -5.20 ± 2.58Not evaluated: Previous spec. excludedLN5-06 1.2 26.00 32.09 ----- -----
Page 17College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityTSH µIU/mL (mIU/L) Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 0.0230 to 87.1240Peer Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT i
Allowable Error: 12.5% or 1 µIU/mL (mIU/L),whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.02317.88133.52953.05169.54785.978
0.02316.76134.03851.15568.18188.270
0.023017.321033.783552.103068.864087.1240
0.025518.829836.997255.752774.940292.3876
137138138138138126
-0.0025 µIU/mL-8.0%-8.7%-6.5%-8.1%-5.7%
± 1.0000 µIU/mL± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%± 12.5%
Note: µIU/mL is equivalent to mIU/L.
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
0 20 40 60 80
-40
-20
0
20
40
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean 1 limit(s) too large to display
◆◆
◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆◆ ◆ ◆
◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 138
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 05LN5-01 - 04LN5-02 - 05
84.1 8.7 4.3 0.7
2.20.00.00.0
91.3 8.0 0.0 0.7
0.00.00.00.0
0.00.00.00.0
Page 18College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityTSH µIU/mL (mIU/L) Linearity Evaluation
Method: ABBOTT ARCHITECT iEvaluation Result: Linear from 0.0230 to 87.1240 Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 25%Mean of Included Results: 43.2031 µIU/mL (mIU/L)
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
0.02317.88133.52953.05169.54785.978
0.02316.76134.03851.15568.18188.270
0.023017.321033.783552.103068.864087.1240
< 017.126534.510951.895369.279786.6640
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
20
40
60
80
Assa
y Re
sult
µIU/
mL
(mIU
/L)
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
-10
-5
0
5
10
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne µ
IU/m
L (m
IU/L
)
Relative Concentration
◆◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆ ◆
◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 19College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityVitamin B-12 pg/mL Calibration Verification Evaluation
Evaluation Result: Verified from 86.5 to 1321.5Peer Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2
Allowable Error: 15% or 30 pg/mL,whichever is greater
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
PeerMean
PeerN
Difference AllowableError
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
83 412 803
1263
90 442 856
1380> 1500> 1500
> 1500> 1500
86.5 427.0 829.5
1321.5
78.7 436.0 849.5
1252.31509.12064.1
2929292814 9
7.8 pg/mL-2.1%-2.4%5.5%
± 30.0 pg/mL± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%± 15.0%
Calibration Verification Plot: Percent Differences withAllowable Error Limits
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Perc
ent D
iffer
ence
Peer Mean
◆
◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
Peer Results Summary Table Peer Group Size: 29
Calibration Verification Linearity EvaluationRange % Verified % Different % Linear % Nonlinear % Imprecise
LN5-01 - 06LN5-01 - 05LN5-01 - 04
Other
20.720.748.3 3.4
3.40.03.40.0
10.721.457.1 0.0
0.00.00.00.0
0.0 0.010.7 0.0
Page 20College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/LinearityVitamin B-12 pg/mL Linearity Evaluation
Method: BECKMAN ACCESS/2Evaluation Result: Imprecise (Poor Repeatability and/or Fit) Evaluation Type: Standard
Goal for Total Error (TE): 30% (25% for Linearity)Mean of Included Results: 666.1 pg/mL
Specimen Assay1
Assay2
YourMean
Best-fitTarget
RelativeConcentration
LN5-01LN5-02LN5-03LN5-04LN5-05LN5-06
83 412 803
1263
90 442 856
1380> 1500> 1500
> 1500> 1500
86.5 427.0 829.5
1321.5
50.0 460.7 871.5
1282.2
0.0000.2000.4000.6000.8001.000
Linearity Plot 1: Reported Resultswith Best-fit Line
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Assa
y Re
sult
pg/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
Linearity Plot 2: Differences withLimits of Acceptable Imprecision
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
-100
0
100
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne p
g/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
◆
●
Included in best-fit lineExcluded from best-fit line
Page 21College of American Pathologists325 Waukegan Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2750800-323-4040 - http://www.cap.org
Advancing Excellence
CAP Number: Kit #:Institution:Attention:City/State:
7181660-01 01 28017117Kit ID:Kit Mailed:
Next Mailing Date:
Laboratorio Medico Las AmericasAna VelasquezMedellin, ANT 050034
06/01/201507/15/201511/23/2015
E V A L U A T I O NORIGINAL
Original Evaluation:
LN5-A 2015 Ligand Calibration Verification/Linearity Vitamin B-12 pg/mL Linearity Troubleshooting Report
Evaluation Result: Imprecise (Poor Repeatability and/or Fit)
Interpretation: Your results have large differences between assay replicates; one set of assays is consistently greater than the other set. Suggested Actions: Check your testing procedure. Both assays from each vial should be tested within the same run. Review specimen handling procedures. Incomplete thawing, inadequate mixing, or improper temperatures can cause problems. Check for evidence of test system malfunction. Pipetting errors, temperature fluctuations, or optical system problems can contribute to large analytical errors. If unable to resolve, contact your method manufacturer.
Troubleshooting Report Plot: Differenceswith Allowable Error Limits
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
-200
-100
0
100
200
Diffe
renc
e fro
m B
est-f
it Li
ne p
g/m
L
Relative Concentration
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆
◆ ◆
◆
-TE
-TE/4
TE/4
TE
Document investigation and corrective action here or on the CVL Investigation Checklist: Reviewed by: Date: