organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

54
Vertical Mergers Kartikye Kasera-112 Deepak Mehta -114 Shivendra Singh-122 Rishabh

Upload: shivendra-singh

Post on 28-Nov-2014

2.180 views

Category:

Business


3 download

DESCRIPTION

vertical mergers

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

VerticalMergers

Kartikye Kasera-112 Deepak Mehta -114 Shivendra Singh-122 Rishabh Chopda-305 Ashwin Kumar Mehta-313 Fenil Shah-319

Page 2: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Contents Introduction and History Concepts and Procedures for global vertical merger Advantages and Disadvantages Types of Vertical mergers Case Study -- Conclusion

Page 3: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)
Page 4: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

History Nineteenth century Scottish-American steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie introduced

the concept and use of vertical integration.

Page 5: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

What Does Vertical Merger Mean?

Vertical integration means that the assets that were previously held by two firms are combined into a single firm.

The result is either joint ownership or the sale of one firm’s assets to the other. Vertical integration means that the assets that were previously held by two firms are combined into a single firm.

The result is either joint ownership or the sale of one firm’s assets to the other.

Page 6: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Benefits of merger

• Diversification of product and service offerings

• Increase in plant capacity

• Larger market share

• Utilization of operational expertise and research and development (R&D)

• Reduction of financial risk

Page 7: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Why do mergers fail ?

• Lack of human integration• Mismanagement of cultural issues• Lack of communication

Page 8: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Challenges..

Vertical mergers involve a manufacturer forming a partnership with a distributor.

Companies to compete with the newly merged company becomes hard.

Distributor no longer has to pay the supplier for material .

Page 9: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Creating Barriers in the Market vertical mergers can foreclose rivals from

access to needed inputs in the market raise prices in the market reduce the quality of product in the market.These effects can definitely make it difficult for

new businesses to enter the market.

Page 10: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Motivation for Mergers

To diversify the areas of activity and thereby to reduce business risks;

To achieve optimum size so as to reap the benefits of economy of scale;

To reduce the duplicate expenses and thereby to improve the profitability;

To serve the customer better;

To have cohesiveness in control of the organisation; To grow without any gestation period; Inorganic growth is believed to be much faster

compared to organic growth.

Page 11: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Takeover might be :

Hostile Takeover A takeover attempt that is

strongly resisted by the target firm

Friendly Takeover Target company's

management and board of directors agree to a merger or acquisition by another company.

Page 12: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Example of Vertical Merger

• Time Warner Incorporated, a major cable operation, and the Turner Corporation, which produces CNN, TBS, and other programming.

• Pixar-Disney Merger

Page 13: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Facts & Figures on Mergers

Worldwide mergers and acquisitions in the first quarter of 2011 exceeded $789 billion.

Combined with $870 billion in Q4 2010 that amounts to over $1.2 trillion over 6 months.

• 1 Source: Thomson Financial Services

Page 14: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

KNIGHTS AND SQUIRES

• In the case of a hostile takeover, the firm making the bid can be referred to as a 'black knight'.

• ‘White knight' is a firm that may enter the fray as a 'friendly' bidder.

• A 'grey knight' is a third firm that is not welcomed by the 'victim', seeking to exploit the situation to their own advantage.

• ‘Yellow knight' is a firm who originally seeks to launch a hostile takeover bid but then moderates its stance and negotiates on the basis of a merger.

• ‘White squires‘ is a firm which may not be big enough to be able to take control of another firm but may well seek to buy into the 'victim' firm to prevent the 'black knight' from being able to achieve its takeover plans.

Page 15: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Global Procedures for Vertical Mergers

Page 16: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Laws vary with countries

• Most of the developed countries of the world have some form of merger control.

• Cross border transactions will be subject to the multiple jurisdictions of the home countries of bidders and targets.

• The laws differ across the countries and among the organizations.

• The laws also govern the structure of the merger going to take place.

• In India, the Companies Act of 1956 is used as a regulation by the companies.

Page 17: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Key Issues

Vertical merger may be anti-competitive.• It may harm the competition by making it difficult

for them to gain access to important raw material/component of a product.

• It may gain control over some channel of distribution.

• The organization may start to monopolize the market and dictate their own terms including raising the prices.

Page 18: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Antitrust !!

Staples wanted to takeover

the stationery shops in India !!!

Page 19: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Clayton Antitrust Act

U.S. antitrust law regime that seeks to prevent anticompetitive practices.

Enforced by the Federal Trade Commission.Section 5

Gives the FTC power to prevent firms from engaging in harmful business practices.

Section 7 Made it illegal for a company to acquire the stock of another company if competition could be adversely affected.Gave the FTC the power to block asset purchases as well as stock purchases

Page 20: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

The Global Guidelines

Page 21: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

The Process

• Top management commits towards merger.• Search for a merger partner• Negotiate with several shortlisted companies

suited to be merger partner for settling terms of merger.

• Initiate the legal procedures in accordance to the government laws.

Page 22: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Global guidelines for a merger

• The scheme of merger should be prepared by the companies, which have arrived at a consensus to merge.

• Approval of Board of Directors for the scheme.• Approval of the scheme by specialized financial

institutions/banks/trustees for debenture holders.• Intimation to Stock Exchange about proposed

merger.• Application to Court for directions for meeting of

creditors/members.

Page 23: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

• Advertisement of the notice of members meeting.• Holding the shareholders general meeting and passing the

resolutions.• Submission of report of the chairman of the general

meeting to Court.• Submission of Joint petition to court for sanctioning the

scheme• Transfer of the assets and liabilities.• Allotment of shares to shareholders of transferor company• Other Post merger obligations.

Page 24: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Tender Offer Process

• Approval by 50 percent or more of the shareholders of the target firm gives control to the bidder.

• After the bidder has obtained control, the terms of the transaction may be “written down” on the minority.

• By law, shareholders of a target firm have a 20-day waiting period before they are required to vote.

• If another bidder competes with the first, the target shareholders must have an additional 10 business days to evaluate the new offer.

Page 25: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Steps

1. The parent forms a wholly/partially owned subsidiary.

2. The target transfers its stock to the parent.3. The target’s assets and liabilities are transferred

to the subsidiary.4. The merger consideration (parent stock) is paid to

the target shareholders for all the target shares.5. All the target shares are canceled.6. The target’s stock is wholly owned by the parent.

Page 26: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Common reasons for vertical integration

• Increased control over quality of supplies or the way the product is marketed

• Better information about supplies or markets• Greater opportunities for differentiation

through coordinated effort• Opportunity to make greater profits by

performing another function in the vertical supply chain

Page 27: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Advantages of a vertical integration :

• Economies of Scale– Large scale production that lead to lower unit costs

• Control of Markets– Gain some form of monopoly power– Control supply– Secure outlets

• Cost– Lower buying cost of material– Lower distribution cost

• Efficiency– Improve technical, productive or allocative efficiency

Page 28: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Contd..

• Shareholder Value– Improve the value of the overall business for

shareholders• Entry barriers to new competitors– if the firm can gain sole access to a scarce resource

• Protects product quality through control of – input quality and – distribution and service of outputs

• Improves internal scheduling (e.g., JIT inventory systems) responses to changes in demand

Page 29: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Disadvantages of vertical integration

• Cost disadvantages of internal supply purchasing– Increase overhead and capital expenditure– low efficiencies due to lack of supplier competition.

• Limits flexibility – In responding to changes in technology, customer

preferences, etc.

• Strategic differences– Increases management difficulty

• Lack of expertise in diversification efforts

Page 30: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Contd..

• Narrows range of choices available to firm for investment

• May reduce innovation

• Established distribution channels may be adversely affected

• Additional administrative costs

Page 31: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

ISSUES WHILE DECIDING WHETHER TO VERTICALLY INTEGRATE AND TO WHAT EXTENT ?

Following issues must be consider

• Are there Economies of scale• Are there any market external factors• Is there any need to pursue any monopoly power??

Page 32: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

CARNEGIE STEEL

• One of the earliest, largest and most famous examples of vertical integration was the Carnegie Steel company.

• The company controlled not only the mills where the steel was made, but also the mines where the iron ore was extracted, the coal mines that supplied the coal, the ships that transported the iron ore and the railroads that transported the coal to the factory, the coke ovens where the coal was cooked, etc.

• The company also focused heavily on developing talent internally from the bottom up, rather than importing it from other companies.

• Later on, Carnegie even established an institute of higher learning to teach the steel processes to the next generation

Page 33: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Vertical Mergers can be classified as

• Forward integration • Backward Integration• Balanced integration

• Forward integrationA company tends toward forward vertical integration when it controls distribution centers and retailers where its products are sold.

• Backward IntegrationA company exhibits backward vertical integration when it controls subsidiaries that produce some of the inputs used in the production of its products.Example: Tata Motors acquires Trilix Srl (Italian design house)

• Balanced vertical integration means a firm controls all of these components, from raw materials to final delivery.

Example :American Apparel

Page 34: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

A good example of forward integration is when a farmer sells his/her crops at the local market rather than to a distribution center.

Page 35: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Example of backward integration

• Tata Motors Ltd said on Monday that it had acquired an 80% stake in Trilix Srl, an Italian design and engineering firm for €1.85 million (Rs. 11.29 crore).

• The acquisition is in line with the company’s objective to enhance its styling and design capabilities to global standards.

.

• The remaining stake in Trilix is held by its promoters Federico Muzio and Justyn Norek.

• With a turnover of €4 million and net profit of €2,50,000, the company offers design and engineering services in the automotive sector.

• Since it is controlling its subsidiary that produces some input.so it is backward integration.

• According to analysts, the acquisition is not a very significant one in terms of the deal size, but it will help Tata Motors enhance its design capabilities. However, since the company is looking forward to some new launches and re-launches, it may be in a positive direction.

Page 36: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Example of Balanced Vertical Integration

American Apparel• American Apparel is a fashion retailer and manufacturer that actually advertises

itself as a vertically integrated industrial company.

• The brand is based in downtown Los Angeles , where from a single building they control the dyeing, finishing, designing, sewing, cutting, marketing and distribution of the company's product.The company shoots and distributes its own advertisements, often using its own employees as subjects.[

• It also owns and operates each of its retail locations.

• According to the management, the vertically integrated model allows the company to design, cut, distribute and sell an item globally in the span of a week.

• Since the company controls both the production and distribution of its product, it is an example of a balanced vertically integrated corporation.

• The original founder Dov Charney has remained the majority shareholder and CEO.

Page 37: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

ROLE OF THE HR DEPARTMENT IN VERTICAL MERGER

• Developing key strategies for a company’s activities.

• Managing the soft due diligence activity.

• Providing input into managing the process of change

• Advising top management on the merged company’s new organizational structure.

• Overseeing the communications

• Managing the learning processes

• Re-casting the HR department itself

Page 38: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

• Identifying and embracing new roles for the HR leader

• Identifying and developing new competencies

The strategic contribution of HR as consisting of the “Five P’s”: Philosophy, Policies, Programs, Practices, and Processes.

Conclusion Vertical merger success entirely depends on the people who drive the Business, their ability to Execute, Creativity, and Innovation. It is of utmost importance to involve HR Professionals in Vertical merger discussions as it has an impact on key people issues.

Page 39: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

VERTICAL MERGERS

Time Warner &

AOL (America Online Inc.)

Page 40: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

TIME WARNER :HISTORY

Warner Brothers has been formally registered on1923.

Warner Brothers made a number of well-known Classic Films, such as Casablanca and a number of Hitchcock thrillers.

Warner Brothers also began to acquire many record labels. (associated with the marketing of music recordings and music videos).

Page 41: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

In 1989, Warner Brothers merged with the publishing house Time to Time Warner for about US$14 Billion

Transformed it into a multi-media company consisting of motion pictures, television production and distribution, studio facilities , magazine publishing and many others.

In order to increase its product portfolio Time Warner acquired Turner Broadcasting System in 1996 and hence became the second largest cable television network.

Page 42: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

AOL (America Online Inc.) : HISTORY

AOL was founded in 1985 under the name Quantum Computer Systems

AOL was the first On-line Service requiring the use of proprietary software (computer software licensed under exclusive legal right of its owner)

AOL also provided Internet access to the World Wide Web

Page 43: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Reasons For The MERGER

TIME WARNER

• Effective way to distribute its contents via Online Channels

• Combination of two global players - Strengthening its international position

• High-quality contents on the internet - translates into Revenue Growth.

• To remain competitive it needed an immediate injection into the Internet.

AOL

• Strategy for moving its customers forward into the world of high-speed "Broadband”

• Increase the Revenues at the three major areas : Subscriptions, Advertising and E-commerce and Content

Page 44: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

On January of 2001, the United States largest internet provider, America Online, merged with the nation’s second largest cable provider to create a media giant

Time Warner's major possessions included the cable networks HBO and CNN, the Warner Brother’s movie and music operations, and Time magazine, while AOL provided internet service to approximately 26 million customers

Terms requires that AOL’s instant messenger be opened to other internet service providers via Time Warner’s cable lines.

Page 45: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

WARNIER BROS TIME TIME

WARNER

Turner Broadcasting

System

AOL

AOL TIME

WARNER

Page 46: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

CONCLUSION

Page 47: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Increasing Profitability Through Vertical Integration

• Building barriers to entry• Facilitating investments in specialized assets• Protecting product quality• Improved scheduling

Page 48: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Motives

Cost Savings

Share Holders

Managerial Rewards

Economies of Scale

Page 49: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Motives

EfficiencyControl

Of Markets

Synergy Risk Bearing

Page 50: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

The Growth of Firms

External Growth:• Through amalgamation, merger

or takeover (acquisitions)• Mergers – agreed amalgamation between two

firms

Page 51: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Behavioural Objectives

• Modern firms have to attempt to match competing stakeholder needs:– Shareholders– Employees– Consumers– Suppliers– Government– Local communities– Environment

Page 52: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Behavioural Objectives

• Firms may have to balance out their responsibilities:– ‘Fat cat pay’– Management rewards – bonuses, etc.– Social and environmental audits– Employee welfare– Meeting consumer needs– Paying suppliers on time– Satisfying shareholders and ‘The City’ about its policies,

plans and actions

Page 53: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)

Diminished Enthusiasm for Vertical Integration

• Inability to achieve expected returns

• Lack of proficiency in diversification efforts

• Conflicting goals of competing businesses

• Decline of capitation payments

• Increased demands of core business

• Substantial changes in payer environment for health plans, hospitals, and post acute services (BBA of 1997)

• Reduced resources for investment

Page 54: Organizatioal behaviour (vertical mergers)