organisational behavior

2
OB Survey Results - Negotiations THOMAS-KILMANN CONFLICT- MODE INSTRUMENT RAVICHANDRAN, Velu Competing (113) 7 middle (30th 70th percentile) Collaborating (113) 3 low (0 20th percentile) Compromising (113) 5 middle (30th 70th percentile) Avoiding (113) 8 high (80th 100th percentile) Accommodating (113) 7 high (80th 100th percentile) Interpreting Your Scores All five modes of handling conflict are useful in various situations, and each represents a set of useful social skills. Here are sayings that capture each mode's essence: Collaboration: "Two heads are better than one." Accommodation: "Kill your enemies with kindness." Compromising: "Split the difference." Avoiding: "Leave well enough alone." Competing: "Might makes right." The effectiveness of any handling any conflict depends on the requirements of the conflict and the skill that is employed. Each of us is capable of using all five conflict modes, and none of us can be characterized as having a single rigid style of dealing with conflict. However, because of personality traits or by habit, individuals tend to use one or two modes at a greater frequency than the others. Conflict resolution tools that a person employs can be selected based on the personal preference and the requirements of the situation. The following information may help you judge how appropriately you use the five methods of conflict resolution: 1. Competing is best used: a) when quick decisive action is vital; e.g., emergencies b) with important issues where unpopular courses of action need implementing, such as cost cutting, or enforcing unpopular rules and discipline c) with issues vital to company welfare when you know you are right d) to protect yourself against people who take advantage of you 2. Collaborating is best used: a) to find an integrative solution when both sets of concerns are too important to be compromised

Upload: ganesandurairaj

Post on 10-Nov-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

OB, Organisation, Organisational Behavior, Behaviour, Report, Case Study, Case report, Ob HEC

TRANSCRIPT

  • OB Survey Results - Negotiations THOMAS-KILMANN CONFLICT- MODE INSTRUMENT RAVICHANDRAN,VeluCompeting(113) 7middle(30th70thpercentile)Collaborating(113) 3low(020thpercentile)Compromising(113) 5middle(30th70thpercentile)Avoiding(113) 8high(80th100thpercentile)Accommodating(113) 7high(80th100thpercentile)InterpretingYourScoresAllfivemodesofhandlingconflictareusefulinvarioussituations,andeachrepresentsasetofusefulsocialskills.Herearesayingsthatcaptureeachmode'sessence:

    Collaboration:"Twoheadsarebetterthanone."Accommodation:"Killyourenemieswithkindness."Compromising:"Splitthedifference."Avoiding:"Leavewellenoughalone."Competing:"Mightmakesright."

    Theeffectivenessofanyhandlinganyconflictdependsontherequirementsoftheconflictandtheskillthatisemployed.Eachofusiscapableofusingallfiveconflictmodes,andnoneofuscanbecharacterizedashavingasinglerigidstyleofdealingwithconflict.However,becauseofpersonalitytraitsorbyhabit,individualstendtouseoneortwomodesatagreaterfrequencythantheothers.Conflictresolutiontoolsthatapersonemployscanbeselectedbasedonthepersonalpreferenceandtherequirementsofthesituation.Thefollowinginformationmayhelpyoujudgehowappropriatelyyouusethefivemethodsofconflictresolution:1.Competingisbestused:

    a) whenquickdecisiveactionisvital;e.g.,emergenciesb) withimportantissueswhereunpopularcoursesofactionneedimplementing,suchascost

    cutting,orenforcingunpopularrulesanddisciplinec) withissuesvitaltocompanywelfarewhenyouknowyouarerightd) toprotectyourselfagainstpeoplewhotakeadvantageofyou

    2.Collaboratingisbestused:

    a) tofindanintegrativesolutionwhenbothsetsofconcernsaretooimportanttobecompromised

  • OB Survey Results - Negotiations

    b) whenyourobjectiveistolearn;e.g.,testingyourownassumptions,understandingtheviewsofothers

    c) tomergeinsightsfrompeoplewithdifferentperspectivesonaproblemd) togaincommitmentbyincorporatingother'sconcernsintoaconsensualdecisione) toworkthroughhardfeelingswhichhavebeeninterferingwithaninterpersonal

    relationship

    3.Compromisingisbestused:a) whengoalsaremoderatelyimportant,butnotworththeeffortorpotentialdisruptionof

    moreassertivemodesb) whentwoopponentswithequalpowerarestronglycommittedtomutuallyexclusivegoals,

    i.e.,asinlabormanagementbargainingc) toachievetemporarysettlementstocomplexissuesd) toarriveatexpedientsolutionsundertimepressuree) asabackupmodewhencollaborationorcompetitionfailstobesuccessful

    4.Avoidingisbestused:

    a) whenanissueistrivial,ofonlypassingimportance,orwhenothermoreimportantissuesarepressing

    b) whenyouperceivenochanceofsatisfyingyourconcerns;e.g.,whenyouhavelowpoweroryouarefrustratedbysomethingthatwouldbeverydifficulttochange(nationalpolicies,someone'spersonality)

    c) whenthepotentialdamageofconfrontingaconflictoutweighsthebenefitsofitsresolutiond) toletpeoplecooldown;i.e.,toreducetensionstoaproductivelevelandregainperspective

    andcomposuree) whengatheringmoreinformationoutweighstheadvantagesofanimmediatedecisionf) whenotherscanresolvetheconflictmoreeffectivelyg) whentheissueseemstangentialorsymptomaticofanothermorebasicissue

    5.Accommodatingisbestused:

    a) whenotherscanresolvetheconflictmoreeffectivelyb) whentheissueismuchmoreimportanttotheotherpersonthantoyourselftosatisfythe

    needsofothersandtoshowyouarereasonablec) tobuildupsocialcreditsforlaterissueswhichareimportanttoyoud) whencontinuedcompetitionwouldonlydamageyourcause,i.e.,whenyouareoutmatched

    andlosinge) whenpreservingharmonyandavoidingdisruptionareespeciallyimportantf) toaidinthemanagerialdevelopmentofsubordinatesbyallowingthemtoexperimentand

    learnfromtheirownmistakes