orchestrating a clinical immersion experience in interprofessional education

1
Occupa’onal Therapy (MAOT) Physical Therapy (DPT) Nursing (ADN, BSN) Nurse Prac’’oner (MS) Physician Assistant (MPA) Holis’c Health (MA) Exercise Science (BS) Spiritual Direc’ons (MA) Social Work (BSW, MSW) The Dip: Orchestrating a Clinical Immersion Experience in Interprofessional Education Karen M Sames OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA and Rebecca L. McGill, Ed.D, RN Interdisciplinary Educa1on Percep1on Scale (IEPS) Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) Interprofessional Educa1on Experience Ques1onnaire (IEEQ) Students Quotes: “I am more open to communica’ng with other healthcare professions and sta’ng my opinion.” “It has been great to figure out how to communicate with others who don’t have the same knowledge.” “My thought process about how I see some health issues has changed because I know that working with other professions is more important than working alone.” “Learned a lot about communica’on and importance of communica’ng expecta’ons to team members.” “I have learned that working together as an interprofessional team does not mean that you lose focus on your professional self.” “I feel more comfortable talking with other medical professions and ac’ng as an advocate for pts.” 19 items scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) Average student scores became more nega’ve at the 6 week mark, but improved and even surpassed original ra’ngs by the end of the course. The item that showed the most posi’ve change was I would welcome the opportunity to work on small group projects with other healthcare students One item showed a slight nega’ve change from day 1 to the last day of the project Pa9ents would ul9mately benefit if healthcare students worked together to solve pa9ent problems 25.23 10.88 24.92 26.69 10.5 26.88 27.32 11.2 27.28 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Competency and Autonomy Perceived Need for Cooperation Perception of Actual Cooperation IEPS Scores Change in IEPS Scores Initial Week 6 Final Elder teachers Students Clinical and Faculty mentors Addi’onal facility support staff SETTING & BACKGROUND OUTCOMES SUMMARY The project resulted in mutual benefit for the University and Carondelet Village. Per CV staff, the student teams posi’vely affected the health and vitality of the elder teachers. Students experience a dip in confidence part way into the project but work through it and come out stronger at the end. This project should be revised and replicated so more students can have an interprofessional team experience. Answer to the research ques’on: Yes, they do report improved teamwork skills DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH QUESTION Do health professions students who par1cipate in an interprofessional educa1on experience report improved teamwork skills? 15 items scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) Two subscales showed steady improvement, one showed a dip at 6 weeks The item with the largest posi’ve change was Individuals in other professions respect the work done by my profession Every item showed a posi’ve change from day 1 to the last day of the project Two campuses – St. Paul and Minneapolis 32 healthcare programs from cer’ficate to clinical doctorate Independent Living Assisted Living Memory Care Care Center SAMPLE TEAM STUDENT PARTICIPANTS 42.26 4.23 18.23 5.85 42.10 4.19 17.77 6.60 42.96 4.04 18.96 4.60 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 Teamwork and Collaboration Negative Professional Identity Positive Professional Identity Roles and Responsibilities Subscale score Change in RIPLS scores Initial Week 6 Final Possible Explana1ons Students overes’mate their teamwork skills when they start an IPE experience (Pollard, Miers, & Gilchrist, 2005). They discover that working in IPE teams is not the same as working in teams with their classmates of the same profession. Differences in the vocabularies of each profession may have made communica’on within the team more challenging than students expected (Coleman, Roberts, Wulff, VanZyl, & Newton, (2008). Student discomfort with role overlap among professions may have surfaced early and then worked through as the team progressed. Students may have had stereotypes about other professions that began to crack as the teams worked together, crea’ng doubt in their minds about what they thought they knew to be true about the other professions. This may have lead to a crisis of selfconfidence (Ateah et al. 2011; Hean, Macleod, Adams, & Humphries, 2006; TunstallPedoe, Rink, & Hilton, 2003). References available on handout St. Catherine University HenrieNa Schmoll School of Health Carondelet Village Ini1al 2 weeks Didac’c por’on of course Form teams Assign mentors and elder teachers Final 14 Weeks Observe Plan Implement Evaluate Evalua1ons Quan’ta’ve RIPLS IEPS Qualita’ve IPEEQ Assignments, mee’ng summaries, field notes Study was conducted over two terms (JTerm and Spring) for 16 week in 2013 and 2014. Elder teacher: Male post CVA with OCD Care Center Sits in wheelchair parked in dining room from 6 am to 7 pm every day Constantly using call bumon Students: OT, nursing, physician assistant, and PT students Clinical mentor: nurse Team 2

Upload: the-american-occupational-therapy-association

Post on 16-Apr-2017

171 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Orchestrating a clinical immersion experience in interprofessional education

   

Occupa'onal  Therapy  (MAOT)  Physical  Therapy  (DPT)  Nursing  (ADN,  BSN)  Nurse  Prac''oner  (MS)  Physician  Assistant  (MPA)  Holis'c  Health  (MA)  Exercise  Science  (BS)  Spiritual  Direc'ons  (MA)  Social  Work  (BSW,  MSW)      

 

               

                   

The Dip: Orchestrating a Clinical Immersion Experience in Interprofessional Education

Karen M Sames OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA and Rebecca L. McGill, Ed.D, RN

Interdisciplinary  Educa1on  Percep1on    Scale  (IEPS)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Readiness  for  Interprofessional  Learning    Scale  (RIPLS)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

Interprofessional  Educa1on  Experience    Ques1onnaire  (IEEQ)  Students  Quotes:  •  “I  am  more  open  to  communica'ng  with  other  healthcare  professions  and  sta'ng  my  opinion.”  •  “It  has  been  great  to  figure  out  how  to  communicate  with  others  who  don’t  have  the  same  knowledge.”  •  “My  thought  process  about  how  I  see  some  health  issues  has  changed  because  I  know  that  working  with  other  professions  is  more  important  than  working  alone.”  

•  “Learned  a  lot  about  communica'on  and  importance  of  communica'ng  expecta'ons  to  team  members.”  •  “I  have  learned  that  working  together  as  an  interprofessional  team  does  not  mean  that  you  lose  focus  on  your  professional  self.”  

•  “I  feel  more  comfortable  talking  with  other  medical  professions  and  ac'ng  as  an  advocate  for  pts.”  

19  items  scored  from  1  (strongly  disagree)  to  5  (strongly  agree)  Average  student  scores  became  more  nega've  at  the  6  week  mark,  but  improved  and  even  surpassed  original  ra'ngs  by  the  end  of  the  course.  The  item  that  showed  the  most  posi've  change  was    •  I  would  welcome  the  opportunity  to  work  on  small-­‐group  projects  with  other  health-­‐care  students  

One  item  showed  a  slight  nega've  change  from  day  1  to  the  last  day  of  the  project  •  Pa9ents  would  ul9mately  benefit  if  health-­‐care  

students  worked  together  to  solve  pa9ent  problems  

25.23

10.88

24.92

26.69

10.5

26.88 27.32

11.2

27.28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Competency and Autonomy Perceived Need for Cooperation Perception of Actual Cooperation

IEPS

Sco

res

Change in IEPS Scores

Initial

Week 6

Final

Elder  teachers  

Students  

Clinical  and  Faculty    mentors  

Addi'onal  facility    support  staff  

SETTING & BACKGROUND

               

                 

OUTCOMES

SUMMARY

•  The  project  resulted  in  mutual  benefit  for  the  University  and  Carondelet  Village.  

•  Per  CV  staff,  the  student  teams  posi'vely  affected  the  health  and  vitality  of  the  elder  teachers.  

•  Students  experience  a  dip  in  confidence  part  way  into  the  project  but  work  through  it  and  come  out  stronger  at  the  end.  

•  This  project  should  be  revised  and  replicated  so  more  students  can  have  an    interprofessional  team  experience.  

•  Answer  to  the  research  ques'on:  Yes,  they  do  report  improved  teamwork  skills  

DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION

RESEARCH QUESTION  

Do  health  professions  students  who  par1cipate  in  an  interprofessional  educa1on  experience  

report  improved  teamwork  skills?    

15  items  scored  from  1  (strongly  disagree)  to  6  (strongly  agree)  

Two  subscales  showed  steady  improvement,  one  showed  a  dip  at  6  weeks  The  item  with  the  largest  posi've  change  was  •  Individuals  in  other  professions  respect  the  work  

done  by  my  profession  Every  item  showed  a  posi've  change  from  day  1  to  the  last  day  of  the  project  Two  campuses  –    

St.  Paul  and  Minneapolis  32  healthcare  programs  from  cer'ficate  to  clinical  doctorate

Independent  Living  Assisted  Living  Memory  Care  Care  Center  

SAMPLE TEAM

Ini1al  2  weeks  

• Didac'c  por'on    of  course  

•  Form  teams  

• Assign  mentors    and  elder  teachers  

Final  14  Weeks  

• Observe  •  Plan  •  Implement  

•  Evaluate  

Evalua1ons  

• Quan'ta've  •  RIPLS  •  IEPS  

• Qualita've    •  IPEEQ  • Assignments,  mee'ng  summaries,  field  notes  

Study  was  conducted  over  two  terms  (J-­‐Term  &  Spring)  for    16  week  in  2013  and  2014.   STUDENT PARTICIPANTS

42.26

4.23

18.23

5.85

42.10

4.19

17.77

6.60

42.96

4.04

18.96

4.60

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

Teamwork and Collaboration Negative Professional Identity

Positive Professional Identity Roles and Responsibilities Su

bsca

le sc

ore

Change in RIPLS scores

Initial

Week 6

Final

Possible  Explana1ons  •  Students  overes'mate  their  teamwork  skills  when  they  start  an  IPE  experience  (Pollard,  Miers,  &  Gilchrist,  

2005).  They  discover  that  working    in  IPE  teams  is  not  the  same  as  working  in  teams  with  their  classmates  of  the  same  profession.  

•  Differences  in  the  vocabularies  of  each  profession  may  have  made  communica'on  within  the  team  more  challenging  than  students  expected  (Coleman,  Roberts,  Wulff,  VanZyl,    &  Newton,  (2008).  

•  Student  discomfort  with  role  overlap  among  professions  may  have  surfaced  early  and  then  worked  through  as  the  team  progressed.  

•  Students  may  have  had  stereotypes  about  other  professions  that  began  to  crack  as  the  teams  worked  together,  crea'ng  doubt  in  their  minds  about  what  they  thought  they  knew  to  be  true  about  the  other    professions.  This  may  have  lead  to  a  crisis  of  self-­‐confidence  (Ateah  et  al.  2011;  Hean,  Macleod,  Adams,  &  Humphries,  2006;  Tunstall-­‐Pedoe,  Rink,  &  Hilton,  

2003).    

References  available  on  handout  

St.  Catherine  University  HenrieNa  Schmoll    School  of  Health  

 

Carondelet  Village  

 

Ini1al  2  weeks  •  Didac'c    por'on    of  course  

•  Form  teams  •  Assign  mentors    and  elder    teachers      

Final  14  Weeks  •  Observe  •  Plan  •  Implement  •  Evaluate  

       

Evalua1ons  •  Quan'ta've  •  RIPLS  •  IEPS  

•  Qualita've    •  IPEEQ  •  Assignments,  mee'ng  summaries,    field  notes  

Study  was  conducted  over  two  terms  (J-­‐Term  and  Spring)  for    16  week  in  2013  and  2014.  

Elder  teacher:    •  Male  post  CVA  with  OCD  •  Care  Center    •  Sits  in  wheelchair  parked  in  dining  room    from  6  am  to  7  pm  every  day  

•  Constantly  using  call  bumon  Students:  •  OT,  nursing,    physician  assistant,    and  PT  students  

Clinical  mentor:    •  nurse  

Team  2