optimization of freeze drying

Upload: ajeet-singh

Post on 08-Apr-2018

248 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    1/29

    Optimization of Freeze-Drying Cycles UsingModulated Differential Scanning

    Calorimetry (MDSC

    )

    Steven R. Aubuchon, Ph.D.

    Product Manager, Thermal Analysis

    [email protected]

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    2/29

    Background on Freeze-drying Process

    Stages of Freeze-drying:1.

    Freezing

    Vials Cooled to 10 to 45C

    Converts Most Water to Ice Concentrates Solute in Vial

    2.

    Primary Drying

    Ice Sublimation and Removal Under Vacuum

    Time Varies from 5 Hours to More Than 5 Days

    Knowledge ofGlass Transition Temperature isCritical to Prevent Collapse of Cake

    3. Secondary Drying Evaporation/Desorption of Unfrozen Water

    Temperature can be Increased to Reduce Time But

    Needs to be Kept Below Glass Transition(Collapse) Temperature

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    3/29

    Background on Freeze-drying Process

    The bulking agent, which can be either crystalline oramorphous, and its interaction with frozen andunfrozen water in the frozen solution, define the

    physical structure which is essential to successfulfreeze-drying.

    This structure manifests itself in the form of

    transitions that occur at specific temperatures.Knowledge of how the structure changes with timeand temperature is critical

    The flow characteristics (viscosity) of anamorphous bulking agent change by severalorders of magnitude over just a few C in thetemperature region of the glass transition

    This can dramatically affect drying time!!

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    4/29

    Background on Freeze-drying Process

    The ability to accurately measure Tg in the frozensolution or in the partially and fully fried lyophilizedcakes greatly improves the cost effectiveness and

    the quality of the final product. Cake collapse should not occur at temperaturesbelow Tg For efficiency, the process should be run at thehighest possible temperature The rate of sublimation (primary drying) approx.doubles with an increase of just a 5C* inprocess temperature

    *M.J. Pikal, Course notes on Freeze-Drying

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    5/29

    State Diagram on Sucrose-Water Solutions

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    6/29

    Why Use Modulated DSC?

    MDSC

    is the preferred analytical technique

    because:

    MDSC is much more sensitive at the lowheating rates required for accuratetemperature measurements

    MDSC can separate overlapping transitionsto greatly simplify interpretation of the data

    MDSC has the unique ability to measure

    heat capacity under isothermal conditions Extremely useful for following changes instructure or sublimation rate as a function

    of time and temperature

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    7/29

    Q2000 Modulated DSC System

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    8/29

    Typical DSC Transitions

    Temperature

    HeatFlow

    exothermic

    Glass

    Transition

    Crystallization

    Melting

    Cross-Linking

    (Cure)

    Oxidation

    Or

    Decomposition

    Composite graph

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    9/29

    Standard DSC of Frozen Sucrose Solution

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    10/29

    MDSCof Frozen Sucrose Solution

    Note: Heating

    Rate 0.5C/min

    S l C i f F S

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    11/29

    Structural Comparison of Frozen SucroseSolution During Slow Cooling and Heating

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    12/29

    Understanding Structural Differences BetweenQuenched and Slow-Cooled Sucrose-Water Solution

    Shape of Derivative Due toWater Freezing with Peak at -36C

    Quench Cooled

    Quench Cooled

    Slow Cooled

    Slow Cooled

    Heat Capacity Signals

    Derivative Signals

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    Deriv.

    RevC

    p(J/g/C/min)

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    RevCp

    (J/g/C)

    -60 -50 -40 -30 -20

    Temperature (C) Universal V3.8A TA Instruments

    Both Steps Due to Tg

    Amorphous Sucrose

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    13/29

    One Experiment on Same Sample Shows Metastability ofQuench-cooled 40% Sucrose-water Solution

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    14/29

    Measuring Time-Dependence of Processeswith Modulated Differential Scanning

    Calorimetry (MDSC

    )

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    15/29

    Question:Is the Structure of a Slow Cooled

    Frozen Solution Stable?

    NO !

    10% Sucrose water Solution in Open DSC Hermetic Lid

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    16/29

    10% Sucrose-water Solution in Open DSC Hermetic Lid(Permits Sublimation of Water)

    Sample in Hermetic Lid

    Eff f 20 H f D i 0 C S

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    17/29

    Effect of 20 Hours of Drying at -40C on Structureof 10% Sucrose-water Solution

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    18/29

    Question:Can MDSC Measure the Rate of

    Sublimation at -40C ?

    YES !

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    19/29

    Use of MDSC to Study Sublimation (Drying) Rate

    During the process of drying @ -40C;

    The amount of water in the sample is decreasing

    The samples heat capacity is decreasing becauseice has a relatively high heat capacity of 2 J/gC

    MDSC has very high sensitivity to measure heat

    capacity or changes in heat capacity

    The structure of the sample is changing, especially

    the structure associated with transitions below -40C

    Molecular mobility increases significantly attemperatures above a glass transition.At -40C, the sample is above the first step in

    heat capacity

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    20/29

    Drying Temperature is Chosen Just Above the Tg

    Quenched

    DryingTemperatureSlowcooled

    Glassy(Rigid)Phase

    Liquid(Mobile)

    Phase

    Heat Capacit of Sol tion Decreases D ring Dr ing

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    21/29

    Heat Capacity of Solution Decreases During DryingDue to Both Structure Change and Mass Loss

    Tg

    H C i f S l i D D i D i

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    22/29

    Heat Capacity of Solution Decreases During DryingDue to Both Structure Change and Mass Loss

    Tg

    H t C it f S l ti D D i D i

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    23/29

    Heat Capacity of Solution Decreases During DryingDue to Both Structure Change and Mass Loss

    Tg

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    24/29

    MDSC Relative Drying Rates of

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    25/29

    MDSC Relative Drying Rates ofSucrose/Water Solutions at -40C

    Once structural changes stop or reach an insignificant rate,

    the decrease in heat capacity with time is a relative measure

    of drying rate.

    Concentration Time to Tg (h)

    Rate of Cp

    Decrease

    J/gC/h (x 10-4 )

    Drying Rate Relative

    to 10%

    Concentration

    10% 6.5 7.8 1

    7.5% 5 11.1 1.4

    5.0% 4 41.6 5.4

    2.5% N/A 50.6 6.6

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    26/29

    Characterization of Lyophilized Samples

    Amorphous structure is easily plasticized by

    water and other solvents. As little as 2-3%

    water can lower Tg by up to 100CTo measure an accurate Tg in a sample with

    a volatile component, it is necessary to

    maintain the volatile content by running the

    sample in a hermetic (sealed) pan

    Use a dry-box or dry-bag to prepare samplesin hermetic pans. This eliminates water

    absorption during preparation and loss of

    water during the measurement

    Absorbed Moisture Acts as a Plasticizer

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    27/29

    Absorbed Moisture Acts as a Plasticizerto Lower the Tg of Sucrose

    Tg of Dry Sucrose

    68C

    Implications for storage conditions

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    28/29

  • 8/7/2019 Optimization of Freeze Drying

    29/29

    Any Questions?

    Steven Aubuchon

    Product Manager, Thermal Analysis

    [email protected]+1 302.427.4073

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]