optimal state feedback control of brushless direct-current motor

8/3/2019 Optimal State Feedback Control of Brushless Direct-current Motor

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/optimal-state-feedback-control-of-brushless-direct-current-motor 1/5



Wang et al . / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(12):1889-1893 1890

Mathematical modelThe dynamic equations of a brushless DC motor

may be expressed as

a

2

a L

a e

d,

d

d,

375 d

,

iu u E iR L

t

GD nT T

t

E K n

− ∆ = + +

− =

=

(1)

where R is the inner resistance of motor, T L the load

torque of motor, GD2

the moment of inertia of motor rotor (in N·m

2), ∆u the voltage drop of the thyristor,

K e the back EMF coefficient. Torque T a and back

electromotive force (EMF) E a, using the concept of

average torque and average back electromotive force.

Due to the bigger ripple (Li et al ., 2004; Wang et al .,

2005), the back EMF and torque have

a T ,T K I = (2)

where I is the current of every phase, K T the torque

coefficient of motor.Taking Laplace transform of Eqs.(1) and (2)

yields the following relationships

a

a T

2

a L

a e

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ),

( ) ( ),

( ) ( ) ( ),375

( ) ( ),

U s U s E s RI s LsI s

T s K I s

GDT s T s sN s

E s K N s

− ∆ = + +

=

− =

=

(3)

where ∆U (s) is small to be neglected, then open loop

transfer function of the system may be expressed as

2a l m l

l m

( ) 1/( )( ) ( 1/ ) ( )

E s TT T aU s s s T T s s a

= = ⋅+ +

, (4)

where T l= L/ R is the effective electrical time constant,

T m= RGD2/(375 K e K T) is the mechanical time constant,

a=1/T l.

Allowing for a zero-order hold (sample-hold) in

the discrete-time domain representation, the Z trans-

form of the above input-output representation may be

expressed as (Kwo, 1992)

21l

2

m e

1 1

l

1 1

m e

2

( )(1 )

( ) ( )

[( 1 e ) (1 e e ) ]

(1 )(1 e )

, (5)

aT aT aT

aT

T N z a z Z

U z T K s s a

T aT aT z z

T K z z

Az B

z Fz D

−

− − − − −

− − −

= −

+

− + + − −=

− −

+=

+ +

where T is the sample period.

State and output equations at the k th sampled

interval are

1 1

2 2

1

2

( 1) ( )0 1( )

( 1) ( )

( ) ( ),

( )( ) [1 0] ( ),

( )

x k x k Au k

x k x k D F B AF

k u k

x k n k k

x k

+ = + + − − −

= +

= =

Gx H

Cx

(6)

where

1

2 1

( ) ( ),

( ) ( 1) ( ),

x k n k

x k x k Au k

=

= + −(7)

A/D

D/A

－

PWM

PWMPWM

PWMPWM

C

Kalman filter

H1

+

Adaptive controller

Optimal state feed back

matrix K

×

u(k )

DSP

H3

H2

PWM1

PWM6

74ls14Drive

circuit B

A

CAP3

n(k )

+

uo(k )

n(k )

n(k )

+

CAP2

CAP1

× u*(k )

Fig.1 Function block diagram of brushless DC motor drive system

ˆ( )n k u*(k )

. . .




G , H , C are all constant matrices for brushless DC

motor. From Eq.(5), the input-output difference

equation may be obtained:

( ) ( 1) ( 2)

( 1) ( 2).

n k F n k D n k

A u k B u k

+ ⋅ − + ⋅ −

= ⋅ − + ⋅ −(8)

STATE ESTIMATION USING KALMAN FILTER

In order to realize the optimal feedback control

using state feedback, the state vector x (k ) needs to be

estimated (Rodriguez and Emadi, 2006). Using Kal-

man filter theory, the algorithm for the derivationˆ( )k x can be obtained as

[ ]{ }

ˆ ˆ( ) ( 1) ( 1) ( )

ˆ( ) ( 1) ( 1) ,

k k u k k

n k k u k

= − + − + ⋅

− − + −

x Gx H K

C Gx H (9)

where ˆ( )k x is the estimated state vector, and G , H , C

are constant matrices known for a brushless DC motor

drive system. Choose Q, R as the weight matrices, and

p(0) the initial matrix, the recurrence algorithms of

Kalman filter gain matrix K (k ) can be calculatedoff-line with

T T

T T 1

( ) ( 1) ,

( ) ( ) [ ( ) ] ,

( ) [ ( ) ] ( ),

k k

k k k

k k k

−

= − +

= +

= −

P GP G HQH

K P C CP C R

P I K C P

(10)

where P (k ) is an estimation error covariance matrix,

and ( )k P is a prediction matrix of the error covari-

ance.

OPTIMAL STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL BY

LYAPUNOV STABILITY CRITERION

The state equation of the system is expressed as

( 1) ( ) ( ).k k u k + = + x Gx H (11)

The control u(k ) is defined as

( ) ( ).u k k = − Kx (12)

The design objective is to find the feedback

matrix K that will bring the state x (k ) from any initial

state x (0) to the equilibrium state x =0 in some optimalsense.

The basic assumption is that the system of

Eq.(11) is asymptotically stable with u(k )=0. This

guarantees that given a positive-definite real sym-

metric matrix Q, there exists a positive-definite real

symmetric matrix P such that

T .− = −G PG P Q (13)

The Lyapunov function is defined as

V [ x (k )]= x T(k ) Px (k ), (14)

and

T

[ ( )] [ ( 1)],

[ ( )] ( ) ( ).

V k V k

V k k k

∆ = +

− = −

x x

x x Qx (15)

As an optimal control problem, we find an op-

timal control uo(k ) which minimizes the performance

index

J =∆V [ x (k )] (16)

in the instant k .Since ∆V [ x (k )] represents the discrete rate of

change of V [ x (k )], we can define V [ x (k )]. So the

minimization of the performance index of Eq.(16)

will carry a physical meaning in optimal control. For

instance,∆V [ x (k )] may represent the rate of change of

speed, distance, or energy along the trajectory x (k ).

For the general form of V [ x (k )] given in Eq.(14),

we write

T T

T T T

[ ( )] ( 1) ( 1) ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ).

V k k k k k

k k k k

∆ = + + −

= − − −

x x Px x Px

x G HK P G HK x x Px

(17)

By the state equation Eq.(11), the last equation can be

written as

T T T T

T T T T T

[ ( )] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ).

V k k k u k k

k u k u k u k k k

∆ = +

+ + −

x x G PGx H PGx

x G PH H PH x Px

(18)

For minimum ∆V [ x (k )] with respect to u(k )

[ ( )]

0.( )

V k

u k

∂∆

=∂

x

(19)




Substituting Eq.(18) into Eq.(19) leads to

T T

2 ( ) 2 ( ) 0.k u k + = H PGx H PH (20)

Therefore, the optimal control is

T 1 T( ) ( ) ( ).u k k

−= − H PH H PGx (21)

Given Q= I (identity matrix) with V [ x ]= x T(k ) Px (k )=0

and P , the optimal control uo(k ) can be obtained.

ADAPTIVE CONTROL TO COMPENSATE

EFFECTS OF NOISE AND DISTURBANCE

If a system is subject to process disturbance and

measurement noise, which are from power supple and

load disturbance, the equations for the system can be

expressed as

( ) ( 1) ( 1) ( 1),

( ) ( ) ( ),

k k u k k

k k k

= − + − + −

= +

x Gx H ξ

n Cx ε(22)

where ξ (k ), ε(k ) are Gaussian noises. Since the output

error due to the above noise and disturbance cannot be

eliminated by optimal feedback control, use of anadaptive algorithm is needed.

The output expectation of the system due to an

arbitrary input u(k ) may be expressed as

( ) ( 1) ( 2) [ ( 1) ( )]

[ ( 2) ( )], (23)

n k Fn k Dn k A u k u k

B u k u k

= − − − − + − + ∆

+ − + ∆

where ∆u(k ) is the input error, due to the existence of

the noise.

The output error is

ˆ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ).n k n k n k A u k B u k ∆ = − = ∆ + ∆ (24)

So an indirect measurement value of ∆u(k ) is

3

( )( ) ( ).

n k u k K n k

A B

∆∆ = = ∆

+(25)

Using an exponential smoothing filter

ˆ ˆ( ) (1 ) ( 1) ( ),n k n k n k β β ∆ = − ∆ − + ∆ (26)

where ˆ( )n k ∆ is the filtered value of ∆n(k ), and β

(0< β <1) is the filter coefficient. The following equa-

tion may be used as an adaptive corrector:

o o

3 ˆ( ) ( 1) ( ).u k u k K n k = − − ∆ (27)

SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS

Technique data of experimented brushless DC

motor

Technique data of the experimented brushless

DC motor are: rated power P =1.57 kW, rated speed

n=1500 rpm, rated current I =4.5 A, moment of iner-

tia-including load J =16 kg/cm2.

Algorithm

Step 1: Calculate coefficients A, B, F , D and

matrices G , H , C .

Step 2: Calculate the optimal feedback matrix K

and control signal u*(k ).

Step 3: Calculate the adaptive signal uo(k ).

Simulation results

Simulation results are given in Fig.2.

In Fig.2, curve 1 corresponds to the dynamic

response of system under the rated load disturbance

without adaptive control, while curve 2 corresponds

to that with adaptive control. The method of optimal

feedback is seen to provide faster step response of

output shaft velocity. To further reduce the sensitivity

to load disturbances, adaptive torque correct methods

were applied in conjunction with optimal feedback control methods.

Fig.2 Dynamic response of system underload disturbance

Rated torque disturbance

1600

S p e e d ( r p m )

1400

1000

800

600

1200

200

400

00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20

1 Without adaptive control

2 With adaptive control

Time (s)

1500




ReferencesDesai, P.C., 2004. Novel Digital Control of Brushless DC

Motor. Master Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology,

Chicago, IL.

Desai, P.C., Emadi, A., 2005. A Novel Digital Control Tech-

nique for Brushless DC Motor Drives: Current Control.

IEEE Int. Conf. on Electric Machines and Drives. San

Antonio, TX, p.326-331.

Dorrell, D.G., Staton, D.A., McGilp, M.I., 2006. Design of

Brushless Permanent Magnet Motors—A Combined

Electromagnetic and Thermal Approach to High Per-

formance Specification. Proc. 32nd Annual Conf. on

IEEE Industrial Electronics. Paris, p.4758-4763.

Kwo, B.C., 1992. Digital Control Systems (2nd Ed.),

Saunders College Publishing, London.

Li, K.P., Hu, Q.S., Huang, Y.K., 2004. The circuit model of

the permanent-magnet brushless DC motor allowing

for its windings inductance and its analysis. Proc.

CSEE , 24(1):76-80 (in Chinese).

Rodriguez, F., Emadi, A., 2006. Novel Digital Control Tech-

nique for Brushless DC Motor Drives: Steady State and

Dynamics. Proc. 32nd Annual Conf. on IEEE Industrial

Electronics. Paris, p.4203-4208.

Sangha, P.S., Coles, J.R., 1995. Design and Analysis of

Brushless DC Machines. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Electrical

Machines and Drives. Durham, p.400-404.

Wang, J., Tao, G.L., Zhou, L.B., Ding, Y.Q., 2005. Research on

the mechanical characteristic of brushless DC motor

based on the analysis of phase commutation. Proc. CSEE ,

25(14):141-145 (in Chinese).

optimal state feedback control of brushless direct-current motor

Documents