opmizing hearing performance with a wireless remote ... · • range: 10-77 years old; mean: 60.7...

21
Op#mizing Hearing Performance with a Wireless Remote Microphone Audio Streaming Accessory Sara Neumann, Au.D. Elizabeth Musgrave, Au.D. Jace Wolfe, Ph.D Mila Duke, Au.D.

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Op#mizingHearingPerformancewithaWirelessRemote

    MicrophoneAudioStreamingAccessory

    SaraNeumann,Au.D.ElizabethMusgrave,Au.D.

    JaceWolfe,Ph.DMilaDuke,Au.D.

  • TheHeartsforHearingTeamAudiologists Addi#onalTeamMembersJaceWolfe,Ph.D.,CCC-A KrisHopperKerriBrumleyPa#BurnsKrystalHudgens,Au.D.,CCC-A SherryEdwardsSusanLaFleurReynaRomeroMeganMarsh,Au.D.,CCC-A Kris#MurphyChris#anBoone KelseyKuehnSaraNeumann,Au.D.,CCC-A VernedaOsborneRachelOdor JackieKeathlyMilaDuke,Au.D.,CCC-A SabrinaCaliseRocioPor#lloElizabethMusgrave,Au.D.,CCC-A RachelMagann-Faivre,Au.D.,F-AAAJohnnaWallace,Au.D.,CCC-ASarahCain,Au.D.,F-AAAEmilyMills,B.S.,AudiologyInternAmandaHeadley,B.S.,AudiologyIntern

    Speech-LanguagePathologistsJoannaT.Smith,M.S.,CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTTamaraElder,M.S.CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTDarcyStowe,M.S.CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTLindsayHanna,M.S.,CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTCarlyGraham,M.S.,CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTCaseyYates,M.S.,CCC-SLPJenniferBryngelson,CCC-SLP,LSLSCert.AVTTessaHixon,M.S.,CCC-SLPParkerWilson,M.A.,CFY-SLP

    CollaboratorErinC.Schafer,Ph.D.,CCC-A,Univ.ofNorthTexas

  • Disclosure

    Thisresearchwaspar0allyfundedbyagrantfromCochlearAmericas

  • TheProblem

    •  Cochlearimplantrecipientsexperiencedifficultywith:– Understandingspeechinnoise– Understandingspeechinreverberantenvironments

    – Understandingspeechfromadistance

  • WirelessAudioStreamingforImplants

    Previous research has shown up to a 60 percentage point improvement in sentence recognition in noise with use of the Cochlear Mini Mic

    Nucleus 6 (CP920) Cochlear Mini Mic

    Can performance improve with changes in Nucleus 6 mixing ratio and/or Mini Mic volume control?

  • StudyObjec0ve

    •  Evaluatetheeffectoftwoparametersonsentencerecogni#oninnoisewithCochlearMiniMic–  AccessoryMixingRa#o– MiniMicVolumeControlSeVng

  • Subjects

    •  10Nucleus6Users–  Age:

    •  Range:10-77yearsold;Mean:60.7yearsold–  UnilateralandBilateralCIUsers

    •  NucleusCI24R,CI24RE,CI422,andCI512.•  Unilateralrecipientsdidnotusehearingaid(earplugged).

    –  AverageDura0onofHearingLoss:24.8–  AverageDura0onofSeveretoProfoundHearingLoss:10.4

  • Equipment

    Nucleus 6 Sound Processor (CI920)

    Cochlear Mini Mic

  • Equipment

    •  Nucleus6soundprocessorprogrammedwithpar0cipant’sprogram– ASC+ADRO(NoSCANorSNR-NR)– VolumeControlsettopar0cipant’sMCL

  • Assessment•  Measuredsentencerecogni#oninquietandinnoisewithandwithoutCochlearMiniMic– AzBioSentences(Spahretal.,2012):

    • Presenta#onLevel– 85dBAatMiniMic(6inchesfromloudspeakerusedtopresentsentences)– 65dBAatloca#onofpar#cipant

    – UncorrelatedClassroomNoise(Schafer&Thibodeau,2006)•  Quiet&Noiseat60,65,70,and75dBA•  Noiseleveliden#calatMiniMicandatsubjectloca#on

    – Onelistpercondi#on(20sentences)

  • Nose Noise

    EquipmentSetup

    AzBio

    NOISE

    schematic diagram

    6 in

    24 ft, 8 in

    25 ft, 3 in

    8 ft, 6 in

    NOISE

    NOISE NOISE

    15ft, 6 in

    17 ft

  • EquipmentSetup

    Ambient Noise Level: 44 dBA Reverberation: 0.6 sec

  • Condi0ons

    •  AccessoryMixingRa0o(MiniMicatdefaultVC)– 1:1– 2:1– AccessoryOnly

    •  MiniMicVolumeControlSe_ng(MixingRa0oat1:1)– DefaultVolumeControlSe_ng– +6dB– +12dB

  • RESULTS

  • NoRemoteMic

    0 0 AzB

    io S

    ente

    nce

    Rec

    ogni

    tion

    % C

    orre

    ct

    Noise Level (dBA)

  • MiniMicBenefit1:1MixingRa0o/DefaultVCSe_ng

    AzB

    io S

    ente

    nce

    Rec

    ogni

    tion

    % C

    orre

    ct

    Noise Level (dBA)

  • MixingRa0oEffectDefaultMiniMicVC

    AzB

    io S

    ente

    nce

    Rec

    ogni

    tion

    % C

    orre

    ct

    Noise Level (dBA)

    No significant difference

  • MiniMicVCEffect1:1MixingRa0o

    AzB

    io S

    ente

    nce

    Rec

    ogni

    tion

    % C

    orre

    ct

    Noise Level (dBA)

    No significant difference

  • Nucleus6SignalPathway

    Figure3

    Microphone

    DirectAuditory/TelecoilInput

    ASC

    Mixing

    ASC

    Attenuates noise at N6 microphone Further decreases with mixing ratio have little effect

    Mini Mic VC increases are being compressed by ASC and/or AGC

  • Conclusions•  UseoftheCochlearMiniMicprovidessignificantimprovement

    inhearingperformanceinnoise

    •  Adjus0ngtheaccessorymixingra0oappearstohavelicleeffectonspeechrecogni0oninnoiseforrecipientsusingASC

    •  IncreasingtheMiniMicvolumecontrolfromthedefaultse_ngappearstohavelicleeffectonspeechrecogni0oninnoise–  ThesefindingsmaybeacributedtocompressionfromASCand/orAGC

    •  Researchisongoingtoexplorestrategiestofurtherimprovespeechrecogni0oninnoiseforNucleus6/MiniMicusers

  • ShootfortheMoon!

    •  THANKYOUFORYOURATTENTION