operational considerations for designing and setting up a

1
Outline. Operational Considerations for Designing and Setting up a Site-Less Decentralised Clinical Trial (DCT) Case Study Bionical Emas are providing full-service CRO support for a Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intranasal antibody in patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 in the UK. Challenges. Study Design Tactics. Expertise in Decentralised Trials: Bionical Emas are founding members of the Decentralised Trials and Research Alliance (DTRA) and are committed to driving decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) forward and ensuring patient centricity in our clinical trial strategy. Given the nature of the treatment pathway and limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, a site-less DCT was the only option for this clinical trial. Our experience as leaders in the DCT space meant that we were well placed to design and implement this novel and highly decentralised clinical trial. Home health nursing team: Patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic COVID-19 are required to self-isolate at home and must not leave the house for any reason other than to go to a test centre for a PCR test. Without home healthcare, this patient population would otherwise be inaccessible, therefore, home health nursing was pivotal to the success of this study. The home health nursing team are central to navigating the operational complexities of ensuring that all nurses visits occur per protocol, IP shipments arrive at the participants house on time, unblinded nurses are available to prepare the IP at each participants home within 2 hours of administration, and couriers are available to collect samples. National Recruitment: The UK COVID-19 landscape is ever changing, and so for COVID-19 studies, it is important to be able to constantly move and adapt to target areas with high cases numbers. A specialist recruitment team was a key part of the study strategy and they developed robust and UK wide digital and community out-reach campaigns. Campaigns were developed to be instantly adaptable and flexible to move to areas of high and/or increasing waves of local cases, and they were also tailored towards the communities within each local area. The specialist recruitment and home health nursing teams needed a joined-up strategy, to ensure that nurse teams were available in the areas that were being targeted for recruitment at each stage of the study. Sample Collection: With typical UK study start-up timelines, approvals and site level activities are usually on the critical path. However, due to the expeditious approval timelines and the Sponsor desire to start the study rapidly, central laboratory set-up was identified as a potentially limiting processes on the critical path for this study. It was important that we identified a central laboratory that could be flexible to this need, and the selected central laboratory committed to an expedited 4-week set-up process to support same-day collection of samples from participants homes via a specialist courier, including shipments of dry ice where frozen samples are required. The nursing team will use mobile centrifuges to prepare samples for collection as required. Direct-to-patient IP Distribution: IP labelling and direct-to-patient IP distribution is provided by a company who are UK experts in this area. As they have an on-site pharmacist, they were able to obtain a temporary license to act as the central pharmacy for the study which meant that IP could be distributed directly to the participants home and did not need to go via another pharmacy. Following randomisation, the IP distributors package the appropriate vials into a temperature controlled shipping container that will arrive at the participants house on the day of treatment. We also developed a highly complex processes to allow for same-day IP deliveries where required. This study was the US Sponsor’s first study in Europe, and we also had to rapidly factor in audit and qualification steps at their manufacturing sites to ensure compliance to UK/EU GMP standards. Our project team scheduled and completed remote audits, responded to findings, completed an audit report, and turned around a QP declaration within a record time of 10 business days. Flexible and Agile Operational Team: To make this study design work, our operational teams had to constantly think outside of the box and find new ways to work. To enable this, we empowered our operational teams to act in a way that facilitates a decentralised design. The team resourced to the study also had a wealth of experience working on other COVID-19 studies and so excelled in this type of environment. Highly flexible teams and processes allowed us to adapt quickly to meet specific needs, without compromising patient safety or data integrity. Daily scrum calls, which included the project’s oversight team, were also important to keep the focus and drive start-up forward. Industry Leading Electronic Systems: Due to the novel study design, it was important that we identified systems that met the needs of the study, rather than needing to adapt systems to fit the study requirements. This was important to ensure operational activities were streamlined and not overly complicated. IBM Clinical Development (IBM CD) was chosen as the most appropriate eDC for the study. As certified IBM CD builders, we build databases quickly. Utilising our eCRF library of standardised forms allows an expedited build process for many of the eCRFs needed, providing time to focus on the study specific forms. Modules available within IBM CD allowed us to have an eDC, electronic diary (ePRO), and randomisation all within one system, allowing consistency and ease for such an innovative study design. Furthermore, the Data Migrator module allowed easy processes to be set up to enable source data to be uploaded directly from outputs from our nursing teams system into the eCRFs, removing the need for transcription, which is critical for a decentralised study. Successful Outcome. Bionical Emas estimated a set-up of less than 6 weeks from final protocol to first patient in, and recruitment of 350 participants in a further 6 weeks. To date, Bionical Emas completed the writing of essential documents (protocol, IB, IMPD), completed early engagement with the MHRA on the study design, and have received full MHRA and REC approvals. A cost comparison of this site less design vs. a traditional site based model showed a 20% reduction in costs for the site-less design. Cost savings were predominantly due to shorter study timelines, particularly with regards to study start-up and recruitment. We welcome future opportunities to offer our expertise in the design of novel and decentralised clinical trials. Develop. Access. Innovate. +44 (0)1462 424 400 | [email protected] | bionicalemas.com Audit Ready TMF and ISF: Another hurdle to overcome was how to maintain an Investigator Site File (ISF) in a site-less design when our systems are set up to manage traditional site-based designs. Although this study is ‘site less’, the documentation requirements for the study team are the same as for a site based design, and so we are able to consider the study as having one ‘virtual’ site. We used Trial Interactives eTMF and eISF solutions to streamline collection of traditional site facing documents such as training and delegation of authority logs. Also, we are using a Learning Management System which will provide training for Investigators and Nurses working on this study. This solution allowed us to implement a streamlined solution to the problem, and maintain one ISF for the entire study. Virtual Investigator Oversight: Without clinical trial sites, we had to find a way to ensure Investigator oversight for the study. We identified two Key Opinion Leaders to support the study; a Chief Investigator to support the protocol design and ethics submission; and a Principal Investigator to maintain primary responsibility for the conduct of the study. We also identified a team of Sub-Investigators who had both clinical trial experience and were appropriate for the trial, such as GPs. Rather than having site level Investigators, we have a study level virtual Investigator team, which has an added benefit of consistency in oversight activities. The team of Sub-Investigators support the Principal Investigator with the day-to-day running of the study and complete traditional Investigator tasks such as reviewing serious adverse events and assessing abnormal laboratory results for clinical significance. They work on a rostered shift system, managed by the project team, and provide continuous cover throughout the trial. Public Engagement: This study is a relatively new and novel design for the UK, and so it was important for us to engage with the public to ensure the design would be acceptable for the target population. We harnessed feedback from a public group on the participant information sheet, and by carefully managing timelines and expectations, we collected and responded to their feedback within 5 business days. In line with their feedback, we implemented a summary participant information sheet to provide a simple-to-read document that gave an overview of the study information considered to be most important to potential participants. Design a study to expedite the development of potential and much needed COVID-19 treatments. Working in an evolving and rapidly-changing COVID-19 landscape where cases appear in difficult to predict waves. Recruiting and treating an outpatient population of COVID-19 positive patients with asymptomatic or mild disease, that are not routinely seen in primary or secondary care in the UK. Nurse Home Visits Co-ordinate and complete in-person visits and administers treatment in the participant’s home Participant Support 24/7 access to Investigator / nurse and technical support call center Virtual Study Visits Daily ePRO, regular check-ins from Investigator Participant Identification National recruitment through digital advertising and community outreach Clinical Contact Centre Pre-screens, gets participant ‘buy in’ and books the screening visit Study Completion Expedited recruitment Higher retention of patients Increased compliance Trial Aspect Traditional Site-less DCT Recruitment In-Person Protocol Visits Telephone Protocol Visits ID Dispensing IP Delivery Laboratory Assessments ePRO Completion Investigator Oversight Investigator and site team led On-site Via telephone IP distributed to site pharmacy, dispensed by site pharmacist Administered at the site Samples taken on-site and results available through a local or central laboratory depending on the same type Participant completes at home on their own (or provisioned) device Site-level on-site Investigator team Self-referral via advertising At the participant’s home Via telephone or virtual call IP distributed direct-to-participant’s home by central dispensary Administered in the participant’s home Samples taken a visit at the participant’s home, posted directly to the central laboratory and results available centrally Participant completes at home on their on own (or provisioned) device Study-level virtual Investigator team

Upload: others

Post on 08-Nov-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Operational Considerations for Designing and Setting up a

Outline.

Operational Considerations forDesigning and Setting up a Site-LessDecentralised Clinical Trial (DCT)

Case Study

Bionical Emas are providing full-service CRO support for a Phase 2 study to evaluate

the safety and efficacy of an intranasal antibody in patients with asymptomatic or mild

COVID-19 in the UK.

Challenges.

Study Design

Tactics.

Expertise in Decentralised Trials:Bionical Emas are founding members of the Decentralised Trials and

Research Alliance (DTRA) and are committed to driving decentralised

clinical trials (DCTs) forward and ensuring patient centricity in our

clinical trial strategy. Given the nature of the treatment pathway and

limitations during the COVID-19 pandemic, a site-less DCT was the only

option for this clinical trial. Our experience as leaders in the DCT space

meant that we were well placed to design and implement this novel and

highly decentralised clinical trial.

Home health nursing team:Patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic COVID-19 are required

to self-isolate at home and must not leave the house for any reason other

than to go to a test centre for a PCR test. Without home healthcare, this

patient population would otherwise be inaccessible, therefore, home

health nursing was pivotal to the success of this study. The home health

nursing team are central to navigating the operational complexities of

ensuring that all nurses visits occur per protocol, IP shipments arrive at the

participants house on time, unblinded nurses are available to prepare the

IP at each participants home within 2 hours of administration, and couriers

are available to collect samples.

National Recruitment:The UK COVID-19 landscape is ever changing, and so for COVID-19

studies, it is important to be able to constantly move and adapt to

target areas with high cases numbers. A specialist recruitment team

was a key part of the study strategy and they developed robust and UK

wide digital and community out-reach campaigns. Campaigns were

developed to be instantly adaptable and flexible to move to areas of

high and/or increasing waves of local cases, and they were also tailored

towards the communities within each local area. The specialist

recruitment and home health nursing teams needed a joined-up

strategy, to ensure that nurse teams were available in the areas that

were being targeted for recruitment at each stage of the study.

Sample Collection:With typical UK study start-up timelines, approvals and site level

activities are usually on the critical path. However, due to the

expeditious approval timelines and the Sponsor desire to start the

study rapidly, central laboratory set-up was identified as a potentially

limiting processes on the critical path for this study. It was important

that we identified a central laboratory that could be flexible to this

need, and the selected central laboratory committed to an expedited

4-week set-up process to support same-day collection of samples

from participants homes via a specialist courier, including shipments of

dry ice where frozen samples are required. The nursing team will use

mobile centrifuges to prepare samples for collection as required.

Direct-to-patient IP Distribution:IP labelling and direct-to-patient IP distribution is provided by a

company who are UK experts in this area. As they have an on-site

pharmacist, they were able to obtain a temporary license to act as the

central pharmacy for the study which meant that IP could be

distributed directly to the participants home and did not need to go via

another pharmacy. Following randomisation, the IP distributors

package the appropriate vials into a temperature controlled shipping

container that will arrive at the participants house on the day of

treatment. We also developed a highly complex processes to allow for

same-day IP deliveries where required. This study was the US

Sponsor’s first study in Europe, and we also had to rapidly factor in

audit and qualification steps at their manufacturing sites to ensure

compliance to UK/EU GMP standards. Our project team scheduled

and completed remote audits, responded to findings, completed an

audit report, and turned around a QP declaration within a record time

of 10 business days.

Flexible and Agile Operational Team:To make this study design work, our operational teams had to

constantly think outside of the box and find new ways to work. To

enable this, we empowered our operational teams to act in a way that

facilitates a decentralised design. The team resourced to the study also

had a wealth of experience working on other COVID-19 studies and so

excelled in this type of environment. Highly flexible teams and

processes allowed us to adapt quickly to meet specific needs, without

compromising patient safety or data integrity. Daily scrum calls, which

included the project’s oversight team, were also important to keep the

focus and drive start-up forward.

Industry Leading Electronic Systems:Due to the novel study design, it was important that we identified

systems that met the needs of the study, rather than needing to adapt

systems to fit the study requirements. This was important to ensure

operational activities were streamlined and not overly complicated.

IBM Clinical Development (IBM CD) was chosen as the most

appropriate eDC for the study. As certified IBM CD builders, we build

databases quickly. Utilising our eCRF library of standardised forms

allows an expedited build process for many of the eCRFs needed,

providing time to focus on the study specific forms. Modules available

within IBM CD allowed us to have an eDC, electronic diary (ePRO), and

randomisation all within one system, allowing consistency and ease for

such an innovative study design. Furthermore, the Data Migrator

module allowed easy processes to be set up to enable source data to

be uploaded directly from outputs from our nursing teams system into

the eCRFs, removing the need for transcription, which is critical for a

decentralised study.

Successful Outcome.

Bionical Emas estimated a set-up of less than 6 weeks from final protocol to first patient in, and recruitment of 350 participants in a further 6 weeks. To date, Bionical Emas completed the writing of essential documents (protocol, IB, IMPD), completed early engagement with the MHRA on the study design, and have received full MHRA and REC approvals.

A cost comparison of this site less design vs. a traditional site based model showed a 20% reduction in costs for the site-less design. Cost savings were predominantly due to shorter study timelines, particularly with regards to study start-up and recruitment.

We welcome future opportunities to offer our expertise in the design of novel and decentralised clinical trials.

Develop. Access. Innovate.+44 (0)1462 424 400 | [email protected] | bionicalemas.com

Audit Ready TMF and ISF:Another hurdle to overcome was how to maintain an Investigator Site

File (ISF) in a site-less design when our systems are set up to manage

traditional site-based designs. Although this study is ‘site less’, the

documentation requirements for the study team are the same as for a

site based design, and so we are able to consider the study as having

one ‘virtual’ site. We used Trial Interactives eTMF and eISF solutions

to streamline collection of traditional site facing documents such as

training and delegation of authority logs. Also, we are using a Learning

Management System which will provide training for Investigators and

Nurses working on this study. This solution allowed us to implement a

streamlined solution to the problem, and maintain one ISF for the

entire study.

Virtual Investigator Oversight:Without clinical trial sites, we had to find a way to ensure Investigator

oversight for the study. We identified two Key Opinion Leaders to

support the study; a Chief Investigator to support the protocol design

and ethics submission; and a Principal Investigator to maintain primary

responsibility for the conduct of the study. We also identified a team of

Sub-Investigators who had both clinical trial experience and were

appropriate for the trial, such as GPs. Rather than having site level

Investigators, we have a study level virtual Investigator team, which

has an added benefit of consistency in oversight activities. The team of

Sub-Investigators support the Principal Investigator with the

day-to-day running of the study and complete traditional Investigator

tasks such as reviewing serious adverse events and assessing abnormal

laboratory results for clinical significance. They work on a rostered

shift system, managed by the project team, and provide continuous

cover throughout the trial.

Public Engagement:This study is a relatively new and novel design for the UK, and so it was

important for us to engage with the public to ensure the design would

be acceptable for the target population. We harnessed feedback from

a public group on the participant information sheet, and by carefully

managing timelines and expectations, we collected and responded to

their feedback within 5 business days. In line with their feedback, we

implemented a summary participant information sheet to provide a

simple-to-read document that gave an overview of the study

information considered to be most important to potential participants.

Design a study to expedite the development of potential and much needed COVID-19 treatments.

Working in an evolving and rapidly-changing COVID-19 landscape where cases appear in difficult to predict waves.

Recruiting and treating an outpatient population of COVID-19 positive patients with asymptomatic or mild disease, that are not routinely seen in primary or secondary care in the UK.

Nurse Home VisitsCo-ordinate and complete in-person

visits and administers treatment in

the participant’s home

Participant Support24/7 access to Investigator /

nurse and technical support

call center

Virtual Study VisitsDaily ePRO, regular check-ins

from Investigator

ParticipantIdentification

National recruitment

through digital advertising

and community outreach

Clinical Contact CentrePre-screens, gets participant ‘buy

in’ and books the screening visit

StudyCompletion

Expedited recruitment

Higher retention of

patients

Increased compliance

Trial Aspect Traditional Site-less DCT

Recruitment

In-Person Protocol Visits

Telephone Protocol Visits

ID Dispensing

IP Delivery

Laboratory Assessments

ePRO Completion

Investigator Oversight

Investigator and site team led

On-site

Via telephone

IP distributed to site pharmacy, dispensed by

site pharmacist

Administered at the site

Samples taken on-site and results available

through a local or central laboratory depending

on the same type

Participant completes at home on their own

(or provisioned) device

Site-level on-site Investigator team

Self-referral via advertising

At the participant’s home

Via telephone or virtual call

IP distributed direct-to-participant’s home by

central dispensary

Administered in the participant’s home

Samples taken a visit at the participant’s home,

posted directly to the central laboratory and results

available centrally

Participant completes at home on their on own

(or provisioned) device

Study-level virtual Investigator team