operational challenges in geothermal power · pdf filechemistry challenges in geothermal power...

30
MIGHTY RIVER POWER Operational Challenges in Geothermal Power Generation Michael Lee AGGAT Above Ground Technologies Workshop 25 th July 2014 CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 1

Upload: dinhliem

Post on 27-Mar-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Operational Challenges in Geothermal Power

Generation

Michael Lee

AGGAT Above Ground Technologies Workshop

25th July 2014

CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 1

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Contents

Operational challenges

Redesign and replace

Proprietary equipment

Deposition & scaling

Sampling and analysis

Geothermal reservoir

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 2

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Design of plant

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

Key challenges:

> Matching above ground equipment to below ground performance

> New field testing is a snapshot in time that determines plant design

> Decisions for plant are made before a bulk of the wells are drilled – you don’t really know how the

field will perform until the plant is running

> Designing a plant to match current and future performance – difficult

> Allow flexibility in the plant to operate within a range of pressure, temperature and enthalpy.

> One thing is for certain the field will change over the life of the plant

> Incremental process and efficiency improvements with operating plants

> Significant production losses for unplanned or forced outages

> Finding the balance between efficiency, scaling, corrosion and cost

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 3

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 4

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 5

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 6

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 7

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 8

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

REDESIGN AND REPLACE

> Redesign

> Select improved materials

> Reconfigure layout

> Operate

> Life improvement from less than 6 months to 3 years and counting

> Adjust design

> Never under estimate the resources operations and technical to resolve issues

> Geothermal chemistry is different at each field

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 9

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

REDESIGN AND REPLACE

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 10

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Pipeline erosion/corrosion

REDESIGN AND REPLACE

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 11

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Hot well pump impellers

PROPRIETARY EQUIPMENT

OEM maintenance schedule 12 year replacement

Maintenance & reliability

Inspected impellers

Impellers started to fail sometime in year 4

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 12

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Hot well Pump Impellers

PROPRIETARY EQUIPMENT

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 13

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Hot well Pump Impellers

PROPRIETARY EQUIPMENT

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 14

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Heat Exchanger Deposition & Scaling

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

Heat exchangers in binary cycle geothermal power plants are

prone to deposition and scaling from minerals in the

geothermal brine.

Common deposits in heat exchangers include:

> Antimony and arsenic sulphides

> Silica

Heat exchanger deposition is often managed through process

design and periodic heat exchanger cleaning (either

mechanical or chemical)

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 15

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Production Well Scaling

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

> Production wells are prone to scaling from calcium

carbonate (calcite) where boiling occurs in the well

> Chemical dosing below boiling point

> On-going testing and well assessment required

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 16

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Production Well Scaling

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 17

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Reinjection well scaling

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

> Different from field to field

> Don’t really know until the station is operational

> Modify brine by injecting sulphuric acid to keep the silica in solution

> Managed by acid injection into HP brine before the first flash stage

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 18

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Brine handling systems

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

The use of acid dosing systems for silica control can result in severe corrosion issues and

material selection challenges.

Sulphuric acid service with high chloride brine at elevated temperatures can create problems

Acid dosing quills before and after brine service at elevated temperatures

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 19

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Brine handling systems

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

Brine handling systems are typically constructed from

carbon steel and normally form a corrosion product layer of

ferrous sulphides and magnetite

> Corrosion risk is heightened

> Corrosion typically worse in areas of two phase flow

> typically worse in locations with flow disturbances

> Corrosion resistant alloys can be used – although these

have there own issues

> Antimony deposition sets-up galvanic corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 20

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Steam system

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

Geothermal power plants typically operate with

saturated steam and steam piping is typically fabricated

from carbon steel.

> Ferrous sulphide and magnetite corrosion product

layer

> Corrosion product layer is not particularly stable

> Introduction of oxygen can result in rapid and severe

corrosion

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 21

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Steam Turbine

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

Scaling of geothermal steam turbines is not uncommon

Turbine scaling is a result of poor steam purity

> Brine carry-over

> Volatile transport

> Corrosion product transport (ferrous sulphides)

Silica is the most common deposit on geothermal steam

turbines and is subject to both mechanical and volatile

transport.

Turbine scaling can be exacerbated by dry steam conditions

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 22

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Steam Turbine

DEPOSITION AND SCALING

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 23

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Power Plant Sampling

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

The low pressures, saturated steam and large pipe diameters can make representative sampling in

geothermal power plants difficult.

> In a multi-flash plant low pressure steam systems may operate at less than 3bar(a)

> Pipe diameters can be up to 1200mm

> Steam can contain a high non-condensable gas content

> Steam chemistry determines deposition and erosion/corrosion rates

> Currently investing significant resources to achieve online purity which we believe will be essential in

providing long term trouble free turbine operation.

> Challenge – online steam purity is not done anywhere else in the geothermal environment

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 24

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Production and Re-injection Well Casings

GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Geothermal well casing are subject to corrosion on both the inside and outside of the casing. External

casing corrosion can be particularly problematic.

Well casing corrosion:

> Carbon steel casing material commonly used

> Hydrochloric acid present in some geothermal reservoirs

> Sulphuric acid present in some heated aquifers

> Bicarbonate waters can corrode well casings when cement is damaged

Where well casing corrosion is problematic corrosion resistant cements may be used and in in some

cases well casings may be fabricated from corrosion resistant alloys.

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 25

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Enthalpy

GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

> Guaranteed the field will change in pressure, enthalpy and output.

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 26

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Below Ground

GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 27

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Challenges and Opportunities

CONCLUSION

Geothermal power generation presents many challenges for operational and technical staff, while also

offering opportunities to improve plant performance, reliability and cost effectiveness.

> Managing power plant chemistry with no control over the feedwater chemistry

> Maintaining steam purity is both essential and challenging

> Predicting and matching changes in the steam field to the power plant equipment

> Finding the balance between efficiency, scaling, corrosion and cost

> Making use of plant flexibility

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 28

MIGHTY RIVER POWER

Final thoughts

CONCLUSION

> Don’t underestimate the value of working with the OEM

> Don’t underestimate the resources needed to keep on top of issues following commissioning

> Don’t underestimate the resources required for on-going monitoring

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 29

MIGHTY RIVER POWER MIGHTY RIVER POWER

QUESTIONS?

CHEMISTRY CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL POWER GENERATION 30