operando x-ray scattering and spectroscopic analysis of ... katie s.pdf · • higher capacity –...

28
Operando X-Ray Scattering and Spectroscopic Analysis of Germanium Nanowire Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries Katharine Silberstein CFES 2015 Conference February 26, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2020

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Operando X-Ray Scattering and

    Spectroscopic Analysis of

    Germanium Nanowire Anodes in

    Lithium-Ion Batteries

    Katharine Silberstein CFES 2015 Conference

    February 26, 2015

  • Outline

    Motivation for battery research

    Operando cell design and methods

    • X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

    • X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)

    Results on Ge NW anodes

    Conclusions

    2

  • Motivation

    3

  • Why Batteries?

    • Store energy from

    alternative, intermittent

    sources via chemical

    reactions for later use in

    electronics, transportation,

    grid load leveling.

    4

  • Batteries Today

    5

    Abruña, H.; Kiya, Y.; Henderson, J. Physics Today 61, 2008, 43-47.

  • Battery Research Goals • Synthesize new materials with enhanced performance

    • Inexpensive – organic, sulfur cathodes

    • Higher capacity – germanium, silicon anodes

    • Correlate molecular structure to bulk electrochemical

    properties • Structural

    • Computation

    • Analytical methods

    • NMR

    • Raman/Infrared

    • X-ray scattering/spectroscopy

    • Electrochemical

    • Cyclic voltammetry in solution and film

    • Coin cell testing

    6

  • Operando Applications

    • To better understand mechanism of charge storage, need

    to look inside functioning cell

    7

  • Analytical Methods

    8

  • Coin Cell Design

    9

  • Pros and Cons of Cell Design

    BENEFITS

    • Facile assembly and alignment in beam path

    • At synchrotron source, experimental timescale dictated by

    sample, not instrumentation

    LIMITATIONS

    • Cannot be reassembled or reused (dictated by coin cells)

    • Still some interference from electrolyte and separator

    10

  • Powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

    11

    • High energy (20-30

    keV) x-rays impinge

    upon polycrystalline

    sample

    • Bragg’s Law:

    nλ = 2d sin(θ)

    • Interference of

    diffracted waves gives

    powder pattern

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

  • Potential Limitations of XRD • Only probes crystalline domains

    • Patterns change in tandem with electrochemistry

    • Possible radiation damage

    • Shifting to new position gives same pattern

    • High background

    • Keeping a constant cell design allows for rational subtraction

    Azimuthal

    integration

    Plot scans vs.

    elapsed time

    12

    Contour plot

    of peaks

    Plot scans vs.

    voltage profile

  • X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)

    13

    Courtesy of S. DeBeer

    Unlike diffraction, XAS requires tunable source to sweep through energies of interest.

  • X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS)

    14

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

    Χ 𝐸 =μ 𝐸 − μ0(𝐸)

    ∆μ(𝐸0)

    http://ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/nilssongroup/corelevel.html

  • Obtaining EXAFS Fits

    • Beyond edge, periodic

    modulation of

    absorption coefficient

    • Transform to k-space

    • Fourier transform to

    radial distribution from

    photoabsorber

    • Fit to known structures

    15

  • Potential Limitations of XAS

    • Material of interest must have absorption edge that is

    accessible at synchrotron source

    • Bulk-sensitive measurement

    16

  • Germanium Anodes XRD and XAS

    17

  • Moving Beyond Carbon

    18

    Courtesy of B. Richards

    • State-of-the-art cells use graphite anodes: (372 mAh/g)

    • Germanium, silicon have much higher theoretical capacity (1600, 4200 mAh/g)

    • But… 300-400% volume expansion from intercalation – nanowires!

  • Ge-Li Phase Diagram Known

    19

    Sangster, J.; Pelton, A. J. Phase Equilib. 1997, 18, 289–294.

  • 5 10 15

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    High

    2(degrees)

    Low 0 1 2 3Potential vs Li/Li+(V)

    Diffra

    ctio

    n S

    ca

    n N

    um

    ber

    Operando XRD

    20

  • 50 100 150 200 250

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0N

    orm

    aliz

    ed Inte

    nsity

    Diffraction Scan Number

    Ge

    GeLi

    Ge4Li9

    Ge2Li7

    Ge4Li15

    Phase Analysis

    21

  • EXAFS

  • Can Crystallinity Be Preserved?

    • Large volume change between Ge and Ge4Li15 believed

    to be main culprit in capacity loss

    • By reversing the cell polarity above the point of

    amorphization, can we preserve some crystallinity?

    • Select 0.3V vs Li/Li+ as voltage cutoff

    23

  • 4 6 8 10 12 14

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    2 (degrees)

    Diffra

    ctio

    n S

    can N

    um

    ber

    Low High Potential vs Li/Li+(V)0 1 2 3

    Operando XRD

    24

  • 20 40 60 80

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    No

    rma

    lize

    d I

    nte

    nsi

    ty

    Diffraction Scan Number

    Ge

    GeLi

    Ge4Li9

    Ge2Li7

    Ge4Li15

    Phase Analysis

    25

  • EXAFS

    26

  • Conclusions

    • Crystalline and amorphous phases able to be probed by

    combining XRD and XAS studies

    • Nanostructuring not enough to prevent amorphization

    brought about by full discharge

    • By limiting depth of discharge, crystallinity can be

    preserved and restored for at least the first few cycles

    27

  • Acknowledgements

    • Ben Richards

    • Dr. Michael Lowe

    • Dr. Jie Gao

    • Prof. Tobias Hanrath

    • Prof. Héctor Abruña

    Beamline support:

    • Dr. Jacob Ruff

    • Dr. Darren Dale

    • Dr. Ken Finkelstein

    • James Pastore

    28