openness in he: choosing our paths

65
OPENNESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: Choosing Our Paths Catherine Cronin @catherinecronin NUI Galway #tlfest15 12 th June 2015

Upload: catherine-cronin

Post on 28-Jul-2015

4.001 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

OPENNESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: Choosing Our Paths

Catherine Cronin @catherinecronin NUI Galway#tlfest15 12th June 2015

Page 2: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

@catherinecronin

#tlfest15

slideshare.net/cicronin

Page 3: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY 2.0 dlofink

Page 4: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Social Networks

InternetMobile

Networked Individualism

Rainie, L. & Wellman, B.(2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System

Page 5: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

2005 2013

Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, 2005-2013

Page 6: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Alec Couros

Networked Teacher

Page 7: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

What is your

NETWORK?(digital & otherwise)

Page 8: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

about.me/catherinecronin

Page 9: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Participatory Culture:

Henry [email protected]

low barriers to artistic expression & civic engagement

strong support for creating & sharing

social connection

members believe their contributions matter

informal mentorship

Page 10: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

Twitter photo: @HelenORahilly

Page 11: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

Page 12: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

@joecaslin joecaslin.com

Page 13: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

@joecaslin joecaslin.com

Page 14: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

@hendinarts

Page 15: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#m

arr

ef

Page 16: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#H

OM

ETO

VO

TE

@anniewestdotcom

Page 17: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#H

OM

ETO

VO

TE

Page 18: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#H

OM

ETO

VO

TE

Page 19: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#H

OM

ETO

VO

TE

Page 20: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#H

OM

ETO

VO

TE

Page 22: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

multimodal

multimedia ✓ voice / choice

networked ✓ topic / content

social ✓ genre / tone

purposeful ✓ space / place

collaborative ✓ time / duration

agentic

Participatory Cultureliteracy practices

Page 23: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Imag

e: C

C B

Y 2

.0 D

eeA

shle

y

a divide between formal and informal learning:

students navigate the dissonance between these – WITH or WITHOUT our support

Page 24: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Evaluating online behaviours | A visitors and residents approach

24

V&R Framework

15/07/2014

(White and Le Cornu 2011)

#vandrVisitors and Residents resources http://goo.gl/vxUMRD

by Lynne Connaway, David White & Donna Lanclos http://www.slideshare.net/oclcr/evaluating-online-behaviours-a-visitors-and-residents-approach

Page 25: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

…furtive thinking and behaviour around open-web resources such as Wikipedia masks the level of use of non-traditional resources and also masks the methods learners use to increase their understanding of subjects, creating what we have called The Learning Black Market. The point at which learning takes place is often not being discussed because either explicitly or implicitly learners are being told by their educational intuitions or perceive that the educational institutions view that their information-seeking practices are not legitimate.

David White, Lynn S. Connaway, Donna Lanclos, Erin M. Hood & Carrie Vass

Evaluating digital services: a Visitors and Residents approach, JISC InfoNet

Page 26: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Seamus Heaney Lightenings viii - video by Eoghan Kidney

vimeo.com/4831035

Page 27: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

3

contributionsto the dialogue

Page 28: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#1 develop, model & embed

digital literacies

#2 choose openwhere possible & appropriate

#3 connect across boundaries

Page 29: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

NetworkedEducators

NetworkedStudents

Physical Spaces

Bounded Online Spaces

Open Online Spaces

Page 30: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

NetworkedEducators

NetworkedStudents

Physical Spaces

Bounded Online Spaces

Open Online Spaces

Image: CC BY-SA 2.0 Catherine Cronin

Page 31: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

A learning space

not

THE learning space

Page 32: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

so…. HOW?

Page 33: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths
Page 34: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

WHAT would

YOUlike to create?

Page 35: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY NC-SA 2.0 catherinecronin

Page 36: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

@CT231 #ct231

Page 37: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths
Page 38: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths
Page 39: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

We’re now looking at the ‘tag-team model’ of education: the projects never end, as there is always a cohort to carry on, and lead into the next group, and when they overlap that’s great – that’s where the genuine collaboration happens. Traditionally, we deliver modules/courses, neatly chunked into 12 weeks, with units of assessment, leading to grades etc. and that’s the way things are (generally) done. I’m not saying scrap all of that, but I do think that modules are best served as springboards to other things.

Increasingly, students are connecting across levels and cohorts through Twitter and now we have ex-students getting together with current students, undergrads coming to postgrad classes (and vice versa) as they’ve connected online and have a genuine interest in getting involved in other groups/further curricula outside of their taught modules.”

#icollab

Helen Keegan (2012)@heloukee

Page 40: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#icollab TAGSExplorerthanks to @mhawksey

Page 41: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Individuals, students and educators, can be nodes in a network.

Groups and learning communities also can be nodes, e.g. via #hashtags.

Page 42: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

I learned a lot more about writing to the public. Before this I would have been less likely to express my views to a group of people online whereas now I would not have a problem in doing so.

By posting publicly it opened up our world to other academics or people who are just interested in the topic... I don’t think anyone would have thought that the author of one of the works we were researching would get involved.

#studentvoice

openness...

Page 43: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Before studying it, I used Facebook and Twitter mainly just for keeping in contact with people, but since have discovered they both have much more to offer.

They are places to discover new information and boost your knowledge. That both education and socialising can be rolled into one.

#studentvoice

social networks...

Page 44: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#1 develop, model & embed

digital literacies

#2 choose openwhere possible & appropriate

#3 connect across boundaries

Page 45: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

#1 develop, model & embed

digital literacies

Page 46: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-ND Bryan Mathers

Ref: White, Connaway, Lanclos, Hood & VassEvaluating digital services: a Visitors and Residents approach, JISC InfoNet

Page 48: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Frederic Poirot

digital identity

Page 49: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Frank Wuestefeld

privacy

Page 50: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

http://umwdomains.com/

Page 51: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image CC BY 2.0 vramek

#2 choose openwhere possible & appropriate

Page 52: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-SA 2.0 Marcel Oosterwijk

…’open’ signals a broad, de-centralized constellation of practices that skirt the institutional structures and roles by which formal learning has been organized for generations.

– Bonnie Stewart (2015)

Page 53: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-SA 2.0 Marcel Oosterwijk

OEP (Open Educational

Practices)

OER (Open Educational

Resources)

Free

Open Admission (e.g. Open University)

DEFINITIONS of ‘OPEN’

Page 54: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Image: CC BY-SA 2.0 Marcel Oosterwijk

OEP (Open Educational

Practices)

OER (Open Educational

Resources)

Free

Open Admission (e.g. Open University)

DEFINITIONS of ‘OPEN’

Culture

Values

Practices

Activities

LEVELS of OPENNESS

I

ndiv

idua

l

In

stitu

taio

nal

Page 55: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Gardner Campbell – Ecologies of Yearning

youtube.com/watch?v=kIzA4ItynYw

Openness [is] process, not product after all. It’s not so much the what we learn but the how and the who with and the why we do so… it’s not so much about “open” as an adjective to describe education; rather it’s “opening” as a verb to describe what we must do. What we want students, learners, all of us, to do.

Audrey Watters (2012)

Page 56: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Reclaim Open Learning “Showcases innovation that brings together the

best of truly open, online and networked learning in the wilds of the Internet, with the expertise

represented by institutions of higher education.”

http://open.media.mit.edu/

Page 57: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

http://open.media.mit.edu/

Reclaim Open Learning Challenge 2013

digilitleic.com

#DigiLitLeic

phonar.org

@phonar

ds106.us

#ds106

jaaga.in

@jaagarnaut

femtechnet.org

@FemTechNet

Page 59: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

“I don’t think education is about centralized instruction anymore; rather, it is the process [of] establishing oneself as a node in a broad network of distributed creativity.”

– Joi Ito @joi

Slide: CC-BY-SA catherinecronin Image: CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 yobink

Page 60: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

NetworkedEducators

NetworkedStudents

Physical Spaces

Bounded Online Spaces

Open Online Spaces

Page 61: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Learners need to practice and experiment with different ways of enacting their identities, and adopt subject positions through different social technologies and media.

These opportunities can only be supported by academic staff who are themselves engaged in digital practices and questioning their own relationship with knowledge.

- Keri Facer & Neil Selwyn (2010)

Page 62: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Bianca Ní Ghrógáin, RIP

@bnighrogain

rangbianca.com

Mary Mulvihill, RIP

@ingeniousie

ingeniousireland.ie

Dialogue cannot exist in the absence of a profound love for the world and its people. –

Freire

Page 63: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Thank you!

Catherine Cronin@catherinecronin

about.me/catherinecronin

slideshare.net/cicronin

Image: CC BY 2.0 visualpanic

Page 64: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

Recommended:

@helenbeetham digital literacies; digital capabilities

@dajbelshaw digital & web literacies@josiefraser #DigiLitLeic project@daveowhite #vandr Visitors & Residents@donnalanclos #vandr Visitors & Residents@gconole digital identity; learning design@bonstewart digital identity; social media@veletsianos networked & open scholarship@mweller open education@oerresearchhub open education (OER & OEP)@mizuko connected learning@jimgroom #ds106; Reclaim Your Domain@audreywatters critical issues in

education/edtech

Page 65: Openness in HE: Choosing our paths

ReferencesAtkins, L., Fraser, J. and Hall, R. (2014) DigiLit Leicester: Project Activities Report, Leicester: Leicester City Council (CC BY-NC 3.0).

Campbell, Gardner (2012). Ecologies of Yearning. Keynote - Open Ed Conference 2012.

Cronin, Catherine (2014). Navigating the marvellous. Medium blog post & ALT Conference keynote.

Facer, Keri & Selwyn, Neil (2010). Social networking: Key messages from the research. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham & S. de Freitas (Eds.) Rethinking Learning For A Digital Age. Routledge.

Gutiérrez, Kris D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the Third Space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148-164.

Heaney, Seamus (1991) Lightenings viii, Seeing Things. Faber and Faber.

Ito, Joi (2011, December 5). In an open-source society, innovating by the seat of our pants. The New York Times.

Jenkins, Henry. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago

Keegan, Helen (2012). A new academic year: global, connected, creative – and not (quite) a MOOC.

Pew Research Internet Project (2013). Social Media Update 2013.

Rainie, Lee & Wellman, Barry (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.

Watters, Audrey (2012). Gardner Campbell, J. Alfred Prufock, and the Ecologies of Yearning. hackeducation

Wenger, Etienne (2010). Knowledgeability in Landscapes of Practice SRHE Conference 2010. In deFreitas & Jameson, Eds. (2012) The e-Learning Reader.

Williams, Bronwyn (2009). Shimmering Literacies: Popular Culture and Reading and Writing Online (New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Peter Lang Publishing.