open access advocacy joining the dots (session 2)
TRANSCRIPT
From clear communication, to advocates and champions
Simon Butt-Bethlendy CIPR Accredited Practitioner
Consonant Communications20 March 2015 | Senate House, UCL
The aims – to cover
• the value of good communication
• terms – communication vs advocacy
• some theory translated into practice
• audiences, channels and messages
• stakeholder engagement for open access
• barriers, challenges and ways to tackle them
• allies and networks of influence
• eliciting help from central university
communication and marketing teams
Why communicate?
• Promotes knowledge-sharing and
collaboration
• Forms, develops and strengthens
interrelationships
• Effective communication essential for
successful organisations
• Identifies common, shared purpose in
diverse, complex environments
• Reduces misunderstanding, encouraging
attitudes and actions in line with strategic
objectives
Some definitions
Communication – Sending and receiving / imparting and
exchanging information and meaning (perhaps to create or
develop relationships).
Advocacy – assuming a position of ‘standing for’ a
particular set of principles, a position or a set of actions.
Actively seeking to persuade others.
Varied modes of communication and advocacy support and enrich one
another. Third-party endorsement and advocacy builds a coalition of support
for your cause which can improve acceptance and initiate changes to attitudes
and behaviours.
Theory and practice
One-way versus two-way (asymmetrical/symmetrical) communications.
Grunig and Hunt (1984) ‘Four Models of Public Relations’
Theory and practice
• Systems theory – a useful critical framework to help communicators
understand an organisation and its publics.
– appreciating interlinked parts
– open vs. closed systems
– input | throughput | output | feedback
• Stakeholder theory – Welch & Jackson (2007)
• Strategy and tactics – audiences and channels
Theory and practice
• Systems theory – a useful critical framework to help communicators
understand an organisation and its publics.
– appreciating interlinked parts
– open vs. closed systems
– input | throughput | output | feedback
• Stakeholder theory – Welch & Jackson (2007)
• Engagement – MacLeod & Clarke (2009) Engage For Success
• Strategy and tactics – audiences and channels
Stakeholder engagement
• Audiences are a
communicator’s first concern
• Map open access
stakeholders and identifying
their needs
• Craft messages that speak to
stakeholders’ needs wherever
possible
• Choose and manage
appropriate communication
channels
• Gather feedback and
communicate changes and
improvements made.
Overcoming barriers and challenges
• Problems reaching target stakeholders
• Lack of awareness, opting out, avoidance
• Resistance to change, hostility, dissident voices
• Regular, clear, compelling communication for awareness-raising
• Share ownership of the issue with managers and supervisors
• Collect persuasive case studies and share success stories
Networks of influence
• This group is one! Jisc OA Pathfinder Project is creating links
• Work within and among existing networks
• Form new groups if necessary
• Avoid forming new committees
Your communications team
• Most universities have talented communication teams willing to help
• Assert the priority of OA and its links to university core strategy and
objectives
• Co-create materials and messages
• Provide good information
QUESTIONS?
Simon Butt-Bethlendy (Associate)
Principal Consultant, Consonant Communications
@GlobalHE @REFimpact