on representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

26
On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions T.N.Palmer ECMWF with thanks to Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Thomas Jung and Antje Weisheimer, ECMWF

Upload: makala

Post on 19-Jan-2016

53 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions. T.N.Palmer ECMWF. with thanks to Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Thomas Jung and Antje Weisheimer, ECMWF. Initial uncertainty. Scenario uncertainty. Scenario uncertainty. Model uncertainty. Model uncertainty. Hawkins and Sutton, 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

On representing model uncertainty in climate

predictions

T.N.Palmer

ECMWF

with thanks to Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Thomas Jung and Antje Weisheimer,

ECMWF

Page 2: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Model uncertainty

Model uncertainty

Scenario uncertainty

Scenario uncertainty

Initial uncertainty

Hawkins and Sutton, 2009

Page 3: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Standard Numerical Ansatz for Climate Model

Deterministic local bulk-formula parametrisation

Increasing scale

;nP X

Eg momentum“transport” by:

•Turbulent eddies in boundary layer

•Orographic gravity wave drag.

•Convective clouds

1X 2X 3X nX... ...

2. pt

u u g uEg

Page 4: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere

Land surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surface

Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice

Sulphateaerosol

Sulphateaerosol

Sulphateaerosol

Non-sulphateaerosol

Non-sulphateaerosol

Carbon cycle Carbon cycle

Atmosphericchemistry

Ocean & sea-icemodel

Sulphurcycle model

Non-sulphateaerosols

Carboncycle model

Land carboncycle model

Ocean carboncycle model

Atmosphericchemistry

Atmosphericchemistry

Off-linemodeldevelopment

Strengthening coloursdenote improvementsin models

1975 1985 1992 1997

The

Met

.Offi

ce H

adle

y C

entr

e

Towards Comprehensive Earth System Models

1970 2000

Page 5: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere Atmosphere

Land surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surfaceLand surface

Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice Ocean & sea-ice

Sulphateaerosol

Sulphateaerosol

Sulphateaerosol

Non-sulphateaerosol

Non-sulphateaerosol

Carbon cycle Carbon cycle

Atmosphericchemistry

Ocean & sea-icemodel

Sulphurcycle model

Non-sulphateaerosols

Carboncycle model

Land carboncycle model

Ocean carboncycle model

Atmosphericchemistry

Atmosphericchemistry

Off-linemodeldevelopment

Strengthening coloursdenote improvementsin models

1975 1985 1992 1997

The

Met

.Offi

ce H

adle

y C

entr

e

1970 2000

Uncertainty

A Missing Box

Page 6: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

How can uncertainty be represented in ESMs?

• Multi-model ensembles

• Perturbed parameters

• Stochastic parametrisation

Page 7: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Seasonal multi-model ensemble

Page 8: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Seasonal Reforecasts (months 2-4) of El Niño with a comprehensive coupled model

observations

predictions

Page 9: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Multi-model seasonal reforecasts of El Niño

Page 10: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

precipitation in DJFstart dates: Nov hindcast period: 1991-2005

lower tercile

Amazon Central America Northern Europe

Multi-model Seasonal Forecast Reliability

Failure of multi-model ensemlble

Page 11: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Slide 13

Surface Pressure

Potential Vorticity on 315K

Blocking Anticyclone

As recognised in AR4, the current

generation of climate models has difficulty simulating a number of internal

modes of climate variability such as

the persistent blocking

anticyclone.

Page 12: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Blocking Index. DJFM 1960-2003

ERA-40

T159

T1259

T1259 run on NSF Cray XT4 “Athena” (two months of dedicated usage) Similar results found by M.Matsueda MRI Japan

Page 13: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

For all their pragmatic value, multi-model ensembles are ad hoc “ensembles of opportunity”.

Component models have common shortcomings, eg due to

limited resolution.

Page 14: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

How can uncertainty be represented in ESMs?

• Multi-model ensembles

• Perturbed parameters

• Stochastic parametrisation

Page 15: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Deterministic local bulk-formula parametrisation

Increasing scale

;nP X

1X 2X 3X nX... ...

2. pt

u u g u

Vary α

Perturbed Parameters

Page 16: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

How can uncertainty be represented in ESMs?

• Multi-model ensembles

• Perturbed parameters

• Stochastic parametrisation

Page 17: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

A stochastic-dynamic paradigm for the Earth-System model

Computationally-cheap nonlinear stochastic-dynamic models, providing specific possible realisations of sub-grid motions rather than sub-grid bulk effects

Coupled over a range of scales

Increasing scale

ECMWF Tech Memo 598

Page 18: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

SAC 2009

Spectral Stochastic Backscatter Scheme

• Origins: Leith (1990), Mason and Thomson (1992)

• Shutts, G.J. (2005). A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble prediction systems. Q.J.R.Meteorol.Soc. 131, 3079

• Berner, J. et al (2009). A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. J. Atmos.Sci., 66, 603-626.

Page 19: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

SAC2009

Slide 21

Backscatter Algorithm

Streamfunction forcing Pattern using spectral AR(1) processes as SPPT

Dtot is a smoothed total dissipation rate, normalized here by

Btot and bR is the backscatter ratio

Page 20: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Realisations of stochastic pattern generator

Page 21: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

In ENSEMBLES we have tested the relative ability of these different representations of uncertainty:

Multi-model ensemblesPerturbed parametersStochastic physics

to make skilful probabilistic seasonal climate predictions.

Page 22: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

“Giorgi” Regions

Page 23: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

dry wet dry wetAustralia

1 2 2 3MM best

Amazon Basin3 0 1 3

PP bestSouthern South America

1 1 1 1SP best

Central America2 3 3 2

Western North America3 3 3 3

Central North America1 1 3 3

Eastern North America1 1 2 3

Alaska3 1 2 3

Greenland1 3 2 3

Mediterranean3 3 3 3

Northern Europe2 2 3 3

Western Africa3 1 2 3

Eastern Africa3 3 2 2

Southern Africa3 3 3 2

Sahel1 3 2 1

South East Asia1 1 1 0

East Asia3 3 3 3

South Asia3 3 3 3

Central Asia2 3 2 2

Tibet1 1 1 2

North Asia3 2 1 1

precipitationJJA DJF

1991-2005lead times: 2-4 monthsDry=lower tercile

Wet=upper tercile Which is best?Brier Skill Score

Page 24: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

cold warm cold warmAustralia

3 3 3 1MM best

Amazon Basin3 1 1 1

PP bestSouthern South America

1 1 3 2SP best

Central America3 1 3 1

Western North America1 1 3 1

Central North America1 1 2 2

Eastern North America3 3 2 3

Alaska3 3 2 2

Greenland1 1 2 2

Mediterranean3 2 1 3

Northern Europe2 2 3 3

Western Africa1 1 3 3

Eastern Africa1 1 2 3

Southern Africa1 2 1 1

Sahel1 2 1 3

South East Asia1 1 2 1

East Asia3 2 1 2

South Asia3 1 3 3

Central Asia1 2 3 2

Tibet3 1 3 3

North Asia1 2 1 2

temperatureJJA DJF

1991-2005lead times: 2-4 months

Brier Skill Score

Cold=lower tercile

Warm=upper tercile

Page 25: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

precipitation over Northern Europe land (north of 48ºN) in DJFstart dates: Nov 1st. hindcast period: 1991-2005

lower tercile

stochastic physics #7

BSS(∞)=0.087BSS(∞)=-0.018

perturbed physicsmulti-model

BSS(∞)=-0.031

Multi-model Seasonal Forecast Reliability

Page 26: On representing model uncertainty in climate predictions

Conclusions

• Stochastic parametrisation and perturbed parameter methodologies are competitive with the traditional multi-model approach to representing model uncertainty

• Stochastic parametrisation “wins” overall for atmospheric variables, but needs to be extended to the ocean and the land surface.

• The ECMWF THOR integrations will be started next year using the latest stochastic parametrisation schemes.