o'malley attorney on dnc debate process

1
SANDLER REIFF 1025 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 www.sandlerreiff.com T: 202-479-1111 F: 202-479-1115 SANDLER REIFF LAMB ROSENSTEIN & BIRKENSTOCK, P.C. August 9, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR O’MALLEY FOR PRESIDENT CAMPAIGN FROM: Joe Sandler SUBJECT: DNC Debate Announcement The DNC’s announcement last week of a certain number of DNC-sanctioned debates, among the candidates for the Democratic nomination, is consistent with its approach in prior election cycles. But the DNC’s effort to force debate sponsors to exclude candidates who participate in other debates is unprecedented and legally unenforceable. On May 5, 2015, the DNC announced a set of “key principles guiding the process of putting together a debate schedule.” Among those principles is an “exclusivity requirement,” to the effect that “Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process.” The DNC is thus attempting to force the media outlets and nonprofit organizations scheduled to host “sanctioned” debates, to agree to exclude candidates who participate in any non-sanctioned debates. First, that effort is entirely unprecedented. Although the DNC announced a schedule of sanctioned debates both in 2004 and 2008, it has never before attempted to require debate sponsors to exclude any recognized candidate as punishment for participating in non-sanctioned debates. Indeed, in 2008, all of the major candidates (then-Senator Obama, then-Senator Clinton, Gov. Bill Richardson, then-Senator Biden, then-Senator Edwards, then-Senator Chris Dodd) participated in one or more debates not sanctioned by the DNC, and none of the sponsors of sanctioned debates were asked to exclude any of the candidates for that reason. Second, the “exclusivity” requirement is legally unenforceable. The sponsors of the debates are ten media outlets and one nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. Under Federal Election Commission rules, the format and structure of each debate must be controlled exclusively by the debate sponsor, not by any party or candidate committee. The FEC rules require each debate sponsor to apply “pre-existing, objective” criteria for determining who can participate in that sponsor’s debate. Legally the DNC cannot dictate the format or structure of any debate sponsored by a media outlet or 501(c)(3) organization— including the criteria for participation. Therefore, it would be legally problematic if any of the sponsors of the sanctioned debates has actually agreed to the “exclusivity” requirement. And in any event, it is highly unlikely that any of those sponsors of the sanctioned debates would ultimately be willing to enforce that “exclusivity” requirement.

Upload: alex-seitz-wald

Post on 18-Aug-2015

885 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley calls the DNC's 2016 debate process unprecedented and "legally problematic."

TRANSCRIPT

SANDLER REIFF 1025 Vermont Ave NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 www.sandlerreiff.com T: 202-479-1111 F: 202-479-1115 SANDLER REIFF LAMB ROSENSTEIN & BIRKENSTOCK, P.C. August 9, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR OMALLEY FOR PRESIDENT CAMPAIGN FROM:Joe Sandler SUBJECT:DNC Debate Announcement The DNCs announcement last week of a certain number of DNC-sanctioned debates, among the candidates for the Democratic nomination, is consistent with its approach in prior election cycles.But the DNCs effort to force debate sponsors to exclude candidates who participate in other debates is unprecedented and legally unenforceable. On May 5, 2015, the DNC announced a set of key principles guiding the process of putting together a debate schedule.Among those principles is an exclusivity requirement, to the effect that Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process.Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process. The DNC is thus attempting to force the media outlets and nonprofit organizations scheduled to host sanctioned debates, to agree to exclude candidates who participate in any non-sanctioned debates. First, that effort is entirely unprecedented.Although the DNC announced a schedule of sanctioned debates both in 2004 and 2008, it has never before attempted to require debate sponsors to exclude any recognized candidate as punishment for participating in non-sanctioned debates.Indeed, in 2008, all of the major candidates (then-Senator Obama, then-Senator Clinton, Gov. Bill Richardson, then-Senator Biden, then-Senator Edwards, then-Senator Chris Dodd) participated in one or more debates not sanctioned by the DNC, and none of the sponsors of sanctioned debates were asked to exclude any of the candidates for that reason. Second, the exclusivity requirement is legally unenforceable.The sponsors of the debates are ten media outlets and one nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization.Under Federal Election Commission rules, the format and structure of each debate must be controlled exclusively by the debate sponsor, not by any party or candidate committee.The FEC rules require each debate sponsor to apply pre-existing, objective criteria for determining who can participate in that sponsors debate.Legally the DNC cannot dictate the format or structure of any debate sponsored by a media outlet or 501(c)(3) organizationincluding the criteria for participation. Therefore, it would be legally problematic if any of the sponsors of the sanctioned debates has actually agreed to the exclusivity requirement. And in any event, it is highly unlikely that any of those sponsors of the sanctioned debates would ultimatelybe willing to enforce that exclusivity requirement.