olecranon fracture
DESCRIPTION
Olecranon fracture. Lonnie Froberg , MD, Ph.D Odense University Hospital. 20% of forearm fracture 12 per 100.000 persons per year Low-energy fall Increased risk >50 years 90% AO 21.B1.1. Duckworth et al. Injury 2012;43:343-346. Why operate? Methods of fixation K-wire, cerklage - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Olecranon fractureOlecranon fracture
Lonnie Froberg, MD, Ph.DLonnie Froberg, MD, Ph.D
Odense University HospitalOdense University Hospital
20% of forearm fracture20% of forearm fracture 12 per 100.000 persons per year12 per 100.000 persons per year Low-energy fallLow-energy fall Increased risk >50 yearsIncreased risk >50 years 90% AO 21.B1.190% AO 21.B1.1
Duckworth et al. Injury 2012;43:343-346 Duckworth et al. Injury 2012;43:343-346
Why operate?Why operate? Methods of fixationMethods of fixation
– K-wire, cerklageK-wire, cerklage– PlatingPlating
OutcomeOutcome SummarySummary
Why operate?Why operate?
Restore articular surfaceRestore articular surface Achieve absolute stabilityAchieve absolute stability Commence early active Commence early active
movementmovement Preservation of range of motion Preservation of range of motion
and powerand power Avoidance of complicationsAvoidance of complications
Methods of fixation?Methods of fixation?
Methods of fixation?Methods of fixation?
Cadaveric elbow jointCadaveric elbow joint Standard osteotomiesStandard osteotomies Five different fixation Five different fixation
techniquestechniques
Loads applied comparable Loads applied comparable to clinical situationsto clinical situations
Displacements measuredDisplacements measured
Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br).1985. 67B;3:367-372Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br).1985. 67B;3:367-372
Methods of fixation?Methods of fixation?
Fracture typeFracture type
TransverseTransverse
ObliqueOblique
ComminutedComminuted
Fixation Fixation techniquetechniqueTension band 1.0 mm, 1 Tension band 1.0 mm, 1 knot, K-wire 2.0 mmknot, K-wire 2.0 mm
Tension band 1.0 mm, 2 Tension band 1.0 mm, 2 knots, K-wire 2.0 mmknots, K-wire 2.0 mm
Tubular plateTubular plate
Cancellous screw, Cancellous screw, washerwasher
Cancellous screw, Cancellous screw, washer, tension bandwasher, tension bandFyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372
Methods of fixation?Methods of fixation?
Fracture Fracture typetype
Fixation Fixation techniquetechnique
TransverseTransverse Tension band, 2 Tension band, 2 knotsknots
ObliqueOblique Tension band, 2 Tension band, 2 knotsknots
or tubular plateor tubular plateComminutedComminuted Tubular plateTubular plate
Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372
K-wire and cerklageK-wire and cerklage
K-wire with or without K-wire with or without eyelets?eyelets?
No significant No significant difference in difference in postoperative pain postoperative pain or in rate of hard or in rate of hard ware removalware removal
Kim et al. Kim et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2013.Jul 9
How to place the K-wires?How to place the K-wires?
Proximal ulnar canal?Proximal ulnar canal? Anterior cortex?Anterior cortex? Distal ulnar canal?Distal ulnar canal?
Huang et al. J Trauma. 2010.68;1:173-176Huang et al. J Trauma. 2010.68;1:173-176
How to place the K-wires?How to place the K-wires?
Proximal ulnar Proximal ulnar (n=24) (n=24)
Anterior Anterior cortexcortex
(n=28)(n=28)
Distal ulnar Distal ulnar (n=26)(n=26)
Average Average follow-up/monfollow-up/monthsths
34.5 s.d 7.234.5 s.d 7.2 34.0 s.d 5.934.0 s.d 5.9 29.6 s.d 7.229.6 s.d 7.2
Symptomatic Symptomatic implant implant removalremoval
8 (33%)8 (33%)
*p=0.03*p=0.033 (11%)3 (11%) 2 (8%)2 (8%)
Proximal Proximal migration of K-migration of K-wire/mmwire/mm
4.08 s.d. 1.894.08 s.d. 1.89
*p=0.001*p=0.0011.53 s.d 0.561.53 s.d 0.56 1.31 s.d 0.541.31 s.d 0.54
Satisfactory Satisfactory functionel functionel outcomeoutcome
21 (88%)21 (88%) 26 (93%)26 (93%) 26 (100%)26 (100%)
How to place the K-wires?How to place the K-wires?
Inserted as close as possible to Inserted as close as possible to the articular surfacethe articular surface
Back 1 cm from final position, cut Back 1 cm from final position, cut obliquely, bent obliquely, bent
Incisions with lines in tricepsIncisions with lines in triceps K-wires are impacted into ulnaK-wires are impacted into ulna
Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581
How to place the K-wires?How to place the K-wires?
K-wire penetration K-wire penetration more than 10 mm more than 10 mm beyond the beyond the anterior cortex anterior cortex increases risk for increases risk for penetration of penetration of median nerve and median nerve and ulnar arteryulnar artery
Prayson et al. Shoulder Elbow Surg. Prayson et al. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008.17;1:121-1252008.17;1:121-125
Which kind of tension band?Which kind of tension band?
FailureFailure
(> 2 mm (> 2 mm movement across movement across osteotomy)osteotomy)
CompressionCompression
Stainless steel Stainless steel wirewire
0% 0% 71%71%
Ethibond No. 2Ethibond No. 2 100%100% 66%66%
Ethibond No. 5Ethibond No. 5 40%40% 40%40%
Fiber wireFiber wire 0%0% 43%43%
Lalliss et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br).2010.92B;2:315-319
PlatingPlating
PlatingPlating
When to plate?When to plate?– Tension band is not Tension band is not
appropriateappropriate– Oblique fractures distal to the Oblique fractures distal to the
midpoint of the troclear notchmidpoint of the troclear notch– Co-existing coronoid fractureCo-existing coronoid fracture– Associated with Monteggia Associated with Monteggia
fracture dislocationfracture dislocation
Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581
Which kind of plate?Which kind of plate?
Cadaveric studyCadaveric study Comminute Comminute
fracturefracture
No difference in No difference in failure rate (>2 mm failure rate (>2 mm gap of fracture)gap of fracture)
Buijze et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Buijze et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2010;130:459-464Surg.2010;130:459-464
Which kind of plate?Which kind of plate?
Advantage of locking Advantage of locking compression plate to compression plate to conventionel plate:conventionel plate:– Angular and axial stabilityAngular and axial stability– Preserves periosteal blood supplyPreserves periosteal blood supply– No toggling of unlocked screws No toggling of unlocked screws
(improves fixation in osteoporotic (improves fixation in osteoporotic fractures and comminution)fractures and comminution)
Which kind of plate?Which kind of plate?
Stainless steel or titanium?Stainless steel or titanium?
More screw in proximal fragment More screw in proximal fragment better than fewer screws?better than fewer screws?
Larger screws better than small Larger screws better than small screws?screws?
Which kind of plate?Which kind of plate?
Accumed stainless stellAccumed stainless stell
Synthes stainless stellSynthes stainless stell
Synthes titaniumSynthes titanium
US ImplantsUS Implants
ZimmerZimmer
Edwards et al. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(5):306-Edwards et al. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(5):306-311311
Which kind of plate?Which kind of plate?
No statistical difference between No statistical difference between maximum load and cycles survivedmaximum load and cycles survived
Edwards et al. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(5):306-311Edwards et al. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(5):306-311
Outcome – Cochrane reviewOutcome – Cochrane review
Veillette et al. Orthop Clin N Am. 2008;39:229-236Veillette et al. Orthop Clin N Am. 2008;39:229-236
Short termShort term
(2-3 years)(2-3 years)
*only plate fixation*only plate fixation
Long-termLong-term
(15-25 years)(15-25 years)
PainPain 1 1
(VAS score)(VAS score)6% severe daily 6% severe daily symptomssymptoms
Motion compared to Motion compared to non-affected armnon-affected arm
Decreased Decreased supinationsupination
Decreased flexion Decreased flexion and extension and extension
(5 degrees)(5 degrees)
Radiographic Radiographic evaluationevaluation
8% OA8% OA 5% OA5% OA
1% non-union1% non-union
Patient-rated Patient-rated outcomeoutcome
9.79.7
(VAS score)(VAS score)96% excellent or 96% excellent or goodgood
Summary – Tension band Summary – Tension band fixationfixation
Fracture: Transverse or Fracture: Transverse or obliqueoblique
K-wire: Anterior cortex or K-wire: Anterior cortex or distal ulnar canaldistal ulnar canal
K-wire penetration: <10 K-wire penetration: <10 mm beyond the anterior mm beyond the anterior cortex cortex
Tension band: 1.0 mm Tension band: 1.0 mm stainless steel wire, 2 stainless steel wire, 2 knotsknots
Summary - PlatingSummary - Plating
Fractures: Distal to the Fractures: Distal to the midpoint of the troclear midpoint of the troclear notch, co-existing coronoid notch, co-existing coronoid fracture, Monteggia fracture, Monteggia
Locking compression plate Locking compression plate theoretically superior to theoretically superior to conventionel plateconventionel plate
Thank youThank you
TechniqueTechnique
TechniqueTechnique
TechniqueTechnique