offspring size, provisioning and performance as a function of maternal investment in coastal marine...
TRANSCRIPT
Offspring size, provisioning and performance as a function of
maternal investment in coastal marine invertebrates
Offspring size, provisioning and performance as a function of
maternal investment in coastal marine invertebrates
Sergio A. CarrascoSergio A. Carrasco
Introduction
Life histories
Cominella virgataPinnoctopus cordiformisMytilus galloprovincialis
Most benthic marine invertebrate species include larval or juvenile stages specialised for dispersal and colonisation of new habitats
Morphology, developmental stages, dispersal, mode of nutrition
Variation in offspring size (e.g. latitudinal, populations, inter- and intra-especific) (Marshall and Keough 2008; Kamel et al. 2010)
Introduction
Offspring size affect the number of individuals that pass through each stage, with consequences for fitness (i.e. survival, growth, reproduction, competition)
If offspring quality is high (i.e. size or energy reserves), more offspring become successful recruits
Initial maternal provisioning
7
Ecological implications
Introduction
Direct developers
It has been suggested that mothers with more control of the provisioning could adaptatively adjust the allocation resources according to local conditions
Maternal provision is the primary source of nutrition for the embryos until the juvenile stage
Reduced potential for dispersal
Results
Hatchling size and performance: Growth & Dessication
Dessication (p=0.738)Size (p=0.001)Sites (p=0.006)PH=MP>PHS>TR
(three-way ANOVA)
Dessication (p=0.74)Size (p=0.01)Sites (p=0.15)
(three-way ANOVA)
Results
Hatchling size and performance: Survival & Dessication
Dessication (p=0.85)Size (p>0.59)Sites (all p=0.78)(GLM)
Dessication (p=0.19)Size (all p=0.0029)Sites (p<0.05)MP=PH>TR>PHS(GLM)
Results
Predator size & prey species
Predator size x prey sp (p=0.036)
(two-way ANOVA) (6-10 mm CW) (11-13 mm CW) (17-20 mm CW)
Results
Juvenile ontogeny & vulnerability to predators
Predator size x prey sp x time (p<0.0001)
(three-way ANOVA) (1d) C. maculosa: 1.7 mm and C. virgata: 3.0 mm(1mo) C. maculosa: 2.2 mm and C. virgata: 4.1 mm(2mo) C. maculosa: 2.6 mm and C. virgata: 4.8 mm
Main conclusions
(3) Offspring size is a key trait for most organisms, influencing an individual’s
subsequent performance and having direct consequences in fitness for both the
offspring and mother
(4) For a wide range of taxa across a variety of habitats, individuals that start
juvenile life with a large size often perform better than smaller conspecifics (e.g.
growth, survival, competition, reproduction)
(1) Per-offspring maternal investment is an integral part of life-history theory with
a plethora of models developed to examine the relationship between egg energy
and the production and quality of offspring
(2) Regardless of the strategy, the division of finite reproductive resources should
ultimately result in an optimal equilibrium between the offspring fitness and the
maximization of the parental fitness