office name goddard space flight center 1 proposed scan-cx interface study approach dave israel...

14
Office Name Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Upload: grant-russell

Post on 08-Jan-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 3 Specific Trade Study Only focus on items that are different between the two options Small team –Bring in technical expertise as needed for testing, demonstrations, or review –Use existing work from other activities for starting points and work with single points of contact for more information –Maintain alignment with CNST, SCIP, SNIS, Standards, and other related activities Provide updates and receive concurrence from SCaN (J. Rush & A. Hooke) and SCIP (R. Miller & J. Hudiburg) throughout the activity

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

1

Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach

Dave IsraelAugust 24, 2007

Page 2: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

2

Study Subject

• Fundamental question: “Should the baseline plan for SCaN support of Cx ISS phase include a service interface to the ground stations at the link layer or network layer?”

• Two basic options for initial Cx support: One uses SLE, one does not.– Out of scope of this initial activity

• AOS/HDLC discussions• Use of IP discussions• LDPC

• Requirements are based on SCaN-Cx MOA and its referenced documents

Page 3: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

3

Specific Trade Study

• Only focus on items that are different between the two options• Small team

– Bring in technical expertise as needed for testing, demonstrations, or review

– Use existing work from other activities for starting points and work with single points of contact for more information

– Maintain alignment with CNST, SCIP, SNIS, Standards, and other related activities

• Provide updates and receive concurrence from SCaN (J. Rush & A. Hooke) and SCIP (R. Miller & J. Hudiburg) throughout the activity

Page 4: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

4

Deliverables and Schedule

• Assumptions used for study• Itemized documentation of each option’s ability to meet Cx requirements• Performance study results• Demonstration of both options performed with GSFC CSTL and JSC• Delta cost between two options

– Implementation– Operations– Future expansion

• Documentation of role and responsibility allocation between Cx and SCaN for each option

• Risk Identification and mitigation strategies• List of open issues• Pros/Cons/Recommendations

Final Report Goal: November 30, 2007

Page 5: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

5

Next Steps

• Collect questions that need to be answered• Collect assumptions• Start forming teams/connections for different activities• Define reference designs for baseline

Page 6: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

6

Expected Subjects

• SLE performance impacts• Security implications• Service management implications• Shift of Roles and Responsibilities• Implementation costs• Operations costs • Future upgrade costs• Interoperability considerations• Demonstrations and tests including data flows with JSC

Page 7: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

7

Discussion Questions

• Is this an acceptable course of action?• What are the schedule drivers?

Page 8: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

8

Reference Diagrams

Page 9: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

9

SCaN-Cx Interfaces Diagram

SCaN CxVehicles

RFCxGround

Elements

Service Management

Data Transfer

Tracking & Navigation

Cx Ground Element Intercommunications

Page 10: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

10

???

Simplified Option Diagram – Link Layer Interface

MS

GS

AF

KSCFDF

SN

NISN

?

SLE

Page 11: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

11

???

Simplified Option Diagram – Network Layer Interface

MS

GS

AF

KSCFDF

SN

NISN

?

Page 12: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

12

Direct IP

IP over SLESide by Side Comparison

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(PHY)

IP

(LNK) (LNK)

EndUser

(App.)

UDP

IP

End UserInternal Node

(LNK)

IP

UDP

(PHY)

(App.)

(LNK)

(PHY)

ControlCenter

Internal NodeControlCenter

AOS

IP

(IP Forwarder)

HDLC

(AOS Forwarder)

(RF)

AOS

(RF)

AOS

Earth GroundStation

HDLC

SLE

(LNK)(LNK)

IP

TCP

SLE

IP

TCP

(PHY) (PHY)

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(PHY)

IP

(LNK) (LNK)

(App.)

UDP

IP

(LNK)

IP

UDP

(PHY)

(App.)

(LNK)

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

IP

(LNK)(LNK)

(PHY) (PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(RF) (RF)

AOS

HDLC

AOS

HDLC

IP

Page 13: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

13

Direct IP

IP over SLE

Cx-SCaN Basic Functional Allocations

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(PHY)

IP

(LNK) (LNK)

EndUser

(App.)

UDP

IP

End UserInternal Node

(LNK)

IP

UDP

(PHY)

(App.)

(LNK)

(PHY)

ControlCenter

Internal NodeControlCenter

AOS

IP

(IP Forwarder)

HDLC

(AOS Forwarder)

(RF)

AOS

(RF)

AOS

Earth GroundStation

HDLC

SLE

(LNK)(LNK)

IP

TCP

SLE

IP

TCP

(PHY) (PHY)

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(PHY)

IP

(LNK) (LNK)

(App.)

UDP

IP

(LNK)

IP

UDP

(PHY)

(App.)

(LNK)

(PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

IP

(LNK)(LNK)

(PHY) (PHY)

(IP Forwarder)

(RF) (RF)

AOS

HDLC

AOS

HDLC

IP

Workstation

SLEG

ateway

Processor

RFRF

Router SLEGateway

Router

Workstation

Router

Processor

RFRF

Router

Router

Router

Page 14: Office Name Goddard Space Flight Center 1 Proposed SCaN-Cx Interface Study Approach Dave Israel August 24, 2007

Office NameOffice NameGoddard Space Flight Center

14

Common to Both Options

• RF Modulation and Coding• Link layer framing• Service Management interfaces• Tracking and navigation• Time services• Line outage recording