of the pacific northwest...inairie-oak pr habitats of the pacific northwest toir the ultimate...
TRANSCRIPT
A conservation business plan to revitalize the prairie-oak habitats
OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST
Thank you to the following individuals for their review of this document:
Bradley Bales (Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture), Marko Bey (Lomakatsi Restoration Project), Kevin Blakely (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife), Greg Block (Sustainable Northwest), Belinda Brown (Lomakatsi Restoration Project), CalLee Davenport (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), Caitlyn Gillespie (Klamath Bird Observatory), Terry Fairbanks (Bureau of Land Management), Matthew Gibbons (The Nature Conservancy), Mary Linders (Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife), James Miskelly (Saanich Native Plants), Kristen Miskelly (Sannich Native Plants), Steve Niemela (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife), Ann Rothe (Halcyon Consultants), Jonathan Soll (Metro Regional Government), Elaine Stewart (Metro Regional Government)
AUTHORS
Bob Altman American Bird Conservancy
Sara Evans-Peters Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture
Elspeth Hilton Kim Center for Natural Lands Management
Nicole Maness Willamette Partnership
Jaime Stephens Klamath Bird Observatory
Bruce Taylor Pacific Birds Habitat Joint Venture
Photo: Bruce Taylor
Cover Photo: Bruce Taylor
04 FOREWORD
06 INTRODUCTION
07 PRAIRIE,OAKS, AND BIRDS AND THE PACIFIC FLYWAY
08 NEED FOR A CONSERVATION BUSINESS PLAN
09 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
10 CHALLENGES
11 CHANGING CLIMATE
12 BYTHENUMBERS:PRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESANDHABITATS
14 OPPORTUNITIES
15 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
18 COST OF RECOVERY AND RESTORATION
20 MOVING FORWARD
21 CROSS-CUTTINGSTRATEGIES
24 PARTNERSHIPS
25 OUTCOMES FOR PEOPLE
26 SUCCESS STORIES
32 TABLE1.REGULATORYSTATUSOFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIES
35 TABLE2.ECOREGIONALPOPULATIONSTATUSOFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIES
38 TABLE3.GENERALHABITATASSOCIATIONSOFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIES
41 LITERATURE CITED
TABLE OF CONTENTSAdrian W
olf © South Sound Prairies 2016
S urrounded by the vast conifer forests of the PacificNorthwest, prairie-oak habitats were once a haven
of open spaces and big oak trees. People historically had a strongconnectionwiththeprairie-oakecosysteminauniqueandamutuallybeneficialrelationship.Nativepeoplesneed-ed resources provided by the prairie-oak ecosystem – acorns, camas bulbs, deer and elk, shelter and cover of the big oak trees–thatwereessentialfortheirsurvival.Theprairie-oakecosystemneededpeopletoregularlyinitiatetheprocessofrenewal through fire. Today, however, that bond betweenpeople, prairies, and oaks is tenuous in many places, and completely gone in others. These have always been the plac-eswherepeoplehavewantedto live.Overtime,however,the historic partnership has been fractured and nearly lost with the expanding impact of the human footprint.
The prairie-oak ecosystem needs help. In some places it is on life support – species are gone or barely hanging on, and inothers, thenativehabitathasbeensooverwhelmedbyinvasive species as to become unrecognizable. Rescue is now dependent on us to step up with the necessary resources to startrebuildingtherelationship.Itwillneverbethesameasbefore;theshifttohumandominanceiscomplete.However,insomeplaceswithimmediateinterventionandregularnur-turing,thehumanconnectionstoprairiesandoakscanbereestablished, not only to save this imperiled ecosystem and its species, but to rekindle a lost heritage.
FOREWORD
Prairie, Oaks, and People
THE VISIONThe Pacific Northwest has an interconnected network of prairie-oak habitat that sustains native species across the region and provides ecological services for future generations.
200
200
100
100
0
0
300
300 400 500
400 MILES
600 KILOMETERS
45º
50º
125º 120º 115º
45º
35º
40º
125º
Distribution of Oregon White
Oak (U.S. Forest Service)
Photo: Bruce Taylor
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 4
When I think about oak trees I think about a really important cultural plant to our people. Myself, I’m Kalapuya. My family signed theWillametteValleyTreaty of 1855. Oak trees are something you need to manageforgenerationstoproduce food. So one gen-erationproducesenoughfood for a person. 25 years. 50 years enough for 3 peo-ple. 75 years, then a whole familyofpeoplecanliveoffthe food.”
—DAVIDHARRELSON, TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, CONFEDERATE TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE
SOURCE: From Oregon’s Oak – A Vanishing Legacy. 2015. Produced by Yamhill Watershed Stewardship Fund and AH Creative.
“MeredithRafferty©
SouthSoundPrairies
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 5
INTRODUCTION
T woiconicfeaturesdefinetheprairie-oakecosystemsofthePacificNorthwest.First is thesignatureoaktree–
typically Oregon white oak (quercus Garryana) from north-ernCalifornia toBritishColumbia,andCaliforniablackoak(quercus Kelloggii) at the southern end of the region. Oak treesprovidenestinghabitatforalmost200wildlifespecies,representingallclassesofterrestrialvertebrates,sustainingareservoirofnativebiodiversity.
The second feature is the open prairies that dominate some parts of the landscape and are scattered among the oakhabitats in other areas. Prairies support the most vulnerable elements of the region’s biodiversity, including endangered butterflieswhosesurvivalisinextricablylinkedtotheflowersof threatened and endangered plant species found only in these increasingly rare habitats.
Many other vulnerable and threatened plants and animals thatdependonPacificNorthwest’sprairie-oakhabitats, in-cludingbirdsandsquirrels,arealreadylistedasthreatenedor endangered in the U.S. or Canada.
Prairie-oak landscapes also support the majority of the hu-manpopulationinthePacificNorthwest–fromsettlement
to today, these continue to be the places where peoplewant to live and farm. As a result, these intertwined mixes of meadows, tree-dotted savannas and dense woodlandsextending fromnorthernCalifornia toBritishColumbiaaredisappearing at an alarming rate and are among the region’s highestprioritiesforconservation.
Withoutproactiveapproaches tomaintainandrestore im-portant prairie-oak habitats, the endangered species list will grow, resulting in ecological crisis and regulatory conflict.Withasoundconservationbusinessstrategy,strongpartner-ships, and carefully targeted investments, however, we can protect and restore the habitat needed to sustain species as these landscapes change.
We have started by bringing together a network that unites participating organizations, agencies, tribal sovereign gov-ernments, private landowners, and land managers around acommonvision for long-termconservationofprairie-oakhabitatsinthePacificNorthwest.
Integratingthemorespecializedneedsofvulnerableprairiespecies into conservation of oak habitats creates holisticstrategies that optimize biodiversity conservation benefits.
By bringing together people with common goals that tran-scend geographic and organizational boundaries, we canalign and unite our efforts to achieve larger conservationgains across the region.
This business plan seeks to create the economic, social, andpoliticalclimatetofundandsupportthe interventionsnecessary to preserve and enhance prairie-oak habitat and thespeciesthatrelyonitthroughoutthePacificNorthwestfortheuseandenjoymentoffuturegenerations.Withthisoverarching strategic framework, this document presents the business case for a 10 to 15-year investment strategy for prairie-oakconservation.
– Bob Altman, Sara Evans-Peters, Elspeth Hilton Kim, Nicole Maness, Jaime Stephens, and Bruce Taylor, on behalf of the Cascadia Prairie-Oak Partnership, Klamath-Siskiyou Oak Network, Pacific Birds, and our many participating partners.
By bringing together people with common
goals that transcend geographic and
organizational boundaries, we can align and
unite our efforts to achieve larger conservation
gains across the region.”
“Photo: Bruce Taylor
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 6
PRAIRIE-OAKBIRDSANDTHEPACIFICFLYWAY
M igratory birds traveling from their breeding sites in prairie-oak habitats of the Pacific Northwest
to their ultimate wintering destinations to the southand back again are both a shared natural resource and a shared responsibility. Most of the approximately 50 species highly associated with these habitats make this journeyeveryyearalongthePacificFlyway.Some, likeOregon vesper sparrow and Lewis’s woodpecker, spend their winters in California, but many go well into Mexico and Central America and some, like common nighthawk, all the way to South America. These birds link our prai-rie-oak conservation efforts with other peoples andplaces on their journey and amplify the impact of our workfarbeyondthePacificNorthwest.Thesharedinter-nationalresponsibilitytosupportthefulllifecycleneedsof migratory birds extends to the cultural heritage of the many places they go.
AdeleButtolph©
2016CommonN
ighthawk
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 7
FRAMEWORK
Need for a conservationbusiness plan
A cross thePacificNorthwest, fromMendocinoCounty,CaliforniatoVancouverIsland,BritishColumbia,dozens
of partners are working to protect and restore prairie-oak habitats and implement recovery actions for species listedunder the United States’ Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA). For many species, population and habitat objectives based on science quan-tifythemagnitudeofworkneeded.Althoughtherequiredinvestmentsare substantial, andavailable funding remainsfarshortoflevelsneededtoachieveobjectives,publicandprivatefundingisbeginningtoflowintoconservationeffortsacross the region.
What we need now is a shared vision and overarching frame-work to coordinate conservation actions and investmentsacross geographic and institutional boundaries and thesilos created by narrowly focused missions and mandates. Withoutacommonframework,weriskduplicationofefforts
andinefficientallocationofscarceconservationresourcestomeet our goals. We also risk failure.
Toattractinvestment,wearepresentingourstrategiesintheformofaconservationbusinessplan.Conservationbusinessplans present clear strategies, outline the resources neces-sarytomeetconservationgoals,andcreateaccountabilitybydefiningmeasurableoutcomes.
Thisconservationbusinessplanisintendedtoshowcaseourvisionforhealthyandabundantpopulationsofnativeprai-rie-oak plants and animals within the context of human needs and a changing climate. The business plan demonstrates ourcollectivecapacitytorespondtoreal-worlddemandforproductsandservicesaroundprairie-oakconservationandgenerate outcomes that are important to people as well as to anaturallyfunctioningecosystem.
Anne Schuster © South Sound Prairies 2015
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 8
Goal and ObjectivesThe goal and objectiveswehaveestablisheddefineourvision for success
A holistic systems approach
addresses conservation goals within a changing landscape
and the context of human needs, maintaining the region’s natural biological diversity as habitats evolve and species shift over
time, and preserving our cultural heritage.
OBJECTIVE 1:
Recover populations of 41 imperiled species and es-tablish the ecological and social
foundations to support their persistence over time.
Providing security for the most vulnerable species
is critical to the success of broader efforts to conserve
regional biodiversity.
OBJECTIVE 2:
Restore and maintain habitats
needed to conserve the biolog-ical diversity of prairie-oak
ecosystems throughout their historic range.
Conservation needs for most species can be
addressed through broader and more flexible strategies tar-geted to lands that offer the best
opportunities for maintaining the diversity and abundance
of prairie-oak habitats over time.
GOAL: Healthy and resilient prairie-oak habitats
across the Pacific Northwest that sustain all of their native species and
generate benefits for current and future generations.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 9
Challenges Toachieveourconservationgoals,significantecological,social,andpoliticalchallengesneedtobeaddressed:
→ Existinghabitatisfragmentedandinsufficienttosupporttargetpopulationsofpriorityspecies.
→ Populationsofmanyimperiledspeciesareisolatedandcontinuetodecline.
→ Key components of the ecosystem, such as large oak trees and large, open prairie landscapes, are being lost and will take decades to replace.
→ The majority of remaining habitat is on private lands, where owners have few incentivestotakeconservationactions.
→ Supportforessentialandongoingmaintenancefollowinginitialrestorationisinadequate.
→ Organizationalcapacityandsupportinginfrastructureareinadequatetomeetconservationneedsandlimitopportunitiesformoreefficientactionacrossmultiplegeographicand
politicalscales.Engagementstrategiesare needed to foster partnerships with federal and state agencies, tribal sovereign governments, and private landowners.
→ Policy and regulatory support are weak or non-existent across most of the region, and in some cases create disincentivesforneededconservationactions.
→ Funding, policy, and resources devoted toconservationfallfarshortofthoseneeded to address the widespread losses of prairie-oak habitats and the continuingdeclineofimperiledspecies.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 10
CHANGINGCLIMATE
P acificNorthwestprairie-oakhabitats areexpectedto see warmer temperatures, drier summers, and
anincreasedlikelihoodofdroughtandsummerwildfire.Because prairie-oak plants are fairly drought tolerant and fire resistant, healthy systems may weather wellin a changing climate. For example, persistent drought conditionscouldnegativelyaffectlessdroughttoleranttree species likeDouglas-fir, resulting inprairieexpan-sion.But althoughfiresmaybeadvantageous toprai-rie-oak systems, years of fire suppression has allowedabnormalamountsofflammablevegetationandgroundcover to accumulate, making normal fires potentiallydevastating.Incorporatingclimateadaptationstrategiesintoourrestorationactivitiesandchoicescan increasethepotentialofoakecosystemstowithstandthelikelyeffectsofclimatechange.Investinginthinning,reintro-duction of beneficial fire, and generally reducing fuelloads canprepareprairie-oakhabitats tobenefit fromthechangingclimatewhilereducingwildfireriskstolocalcommunities.
Anne Schuster © South Sound Prairies 2015
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 11
BY THE NUMBERS
Prairie-Oak Species Nativeprairie-oak species are at a crossroads. Populationsaredeclining,rangesarecontracting,andmanyspeciesaregone from parts of their historic range. Some have received officialstatustoassistinconservation,manyothershavenot.Our goal is to save the most imperiled, and keep the rest from becoming imperiled.
Threatened or Endangered species havebeenextirpatedornear-extirpated
from Canada
arevulnerableandatriskofcontinueddeclinetolevelsqualifyingforlistingasThreatenedorEndangered
41 listed as Threatened or Endangered at Federal, State, or Provincial levels
SPECIES
+50OTHERSPECIES
listed as Threatened or
Endangered in both United States and
Canada4
13
SPECIES
SPECIES
havebeenextirpatedornear-extirpatedfromatleast one ecoregion in their range
23 SPECIES
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 12
BY THE NUMBERS
Prairie-Oak Habitats The remnant habitats of the prairie-oak landscape are great-lyreducedinarea,degradedinstructureandcomposition,fragmentedand isolated indistribution. Anexpandinghu-manfootprintandthespreadofinvasiveplantcompetitorspresent continuing threats. Remaining habitats in manyareas are deficient in biodiversity, and inadequate to sup-portpopulationsofimperiledspecies.Ourgoalistoprotectwhat we have, and restore what we can to preserve this natural legacy.
Habitatlossesaredifficulttoquantifypreciselyinmanyareas,butmappingof historic conditions suggests thatreductionsinprairie-oakhabitatarewidespreadandsubstantial.
200
200
100
100
0
0
300
300 400 500
400 MILES
600 KILOMETERS
45º
50º
125º 120º 115º
45º
35º
40º
125º
Georgia BasinPuget LowlandsWillamette ValleyKlamath MountainsEast Cascades
Ecoregions:
BRITISHCOLUMBIA
InBritishColumbia,more than 95% of the prairie-oak habitat is
gone. (Lea 2002)
PUGETLOWLANDS
More than 65% of the oak habitat in the Puget Lowlands is gone. (Public
Forestry Foundation 1995)
WILLAMETTEVALLEYMore than 99% of prairie
and savanna habitat in the WillametteValleyisgone.
(Christy et al. 1999, Alverson 2005)
EAST CASCADES
Oak woodlands and savannas have declined by
more than two-thirds in the East Cascades (Defenders
of Wildlife 1998).
PUGETLOWLANDS
In the Puget Lowlands, loss of prairie habitat
exceeds 90%. (Crawford and Hall
1997)
UMPQUAVALLEY
In the Umpqua Valley, there has been a 64% loss of prairie and savanna and
a oak woodlands have declined by 56% (TNC
and Kreuger 2013)
NORTHFORKEELRIVER
Oak woodlands in the North Fork Eel River water-shed had been reduced by more than 80% from 1855
to 1985 (Keter 1989).
WILLAMETTEVALLEY
Oak woodlands and savanna in the Willamette Valley have been reduced by about 80% (Defenders
of Wildlife 1998)
Adapted from Omernik 1987
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 13
Opportunities Severalecologicalfactorsalsofavorsuccessfulconservationofprairie-oakspeciesandhabitats:
→ Many imperiled prairie-oak species can persist inrelativelysmallareasandinconjunctionwith a range of land uses.
→ Conservationactionsthatbenefitindividualimperiled species can also address broader prairie-oakconservationpriorities,providingopportunitiesforefficientinvestmentonaregional scale.
→ Climate change is projected to enhance long-term prospects for prairie-oak habitats in the PacificNorthwest,ifweareabletosustainspeciesastheseecosystemsshiftacrosslatitudeandelevation.
→ Prairie-oakhabitatisahighconservationpriority among natural resource managers andconservationinterestsinthePacificNorthwest.
→ Publicsupportisrelativelystrong,withaconcernedandactiveconstituency.
→ Many partners have been working on prairie-oakhabitatprotectionandrestorationandspeciesconservationeffortsformorethanadecade.
However,afoundationforsuccessisalreadyinplaceforconservingprairie-oakspeciesandhabitats:
AdamM
artin©SouthSoundPrairies
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 14
ACTION
StrategicFramework
PROTECTPRAIRIE-OAKHABITAT
RESTORE AND MANAGE PRAIRIE-OAK HABITAT
SUPPORT RECOVERY OF IMPERILED PRAIRIE-OAK SPECIES
STRENGTHEN CONSERVATION INFRASTRUCTURE
INFORM CONSERVATION EFFORTS THROUGH MONITORING AND RESEARCH
EXPAND SOCIAL, POLITICAL, AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR PRAIRIE-OAK CONSERVATION
Thisconservationbusinessplanidentifiesprioritystrategiesthat address the major threats to prairie-oak systems. These include:conservingandmanaginghabitat;supportingspe-ciesrecoveryefforts;strengtheningconservationinfrastruc-ture; improvingourunderstandingof limiting factors;andexpandingpolicyandfinancialsupport.
Photo: Bruce Taylor
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 15
PROTECT PRAIRIE-OAK HABITAT
Secure long-termprotectionfor landswithhighconserva-tionvaluetopreventactivitiesthatdegradehabitat.Createanetworkofpublicandprivateconservationlandsthatsus-tainfunctioningecosystemsacrossthelandscape.
RESTOREANDMANAGE PRAIRIE-OAK HABITAT
Manage habitats to improve natural ecosystem processes and functions, improve connectivity, and ensure that de-siredhabitatconditionsaremaintainedovertime.
SUPPORT RECOVERYOFIMPERILED PRAIRIE-OAK SPECIES
Increasepopulationsofpriorityspeciesandstabilizepopu-lationsofdecliningspeciesbeforetheybecomeimperiled.
PRIORITYACTIONS:
Protectanetworkoflandscapableofsupportinghealthyhabitatsthroughfeetitleacquisitions,conservationeasements,andotherlegalmechanisms.
Targetlandconservationeffortstoincreaseconnectivityandresilienceofhabitatsacrosstherange of imperiled and vulnerable species.
Managehabitattosupportdesirednativehabitatconditions,incorporatingtraditionalecologicalknowledge and removing or reducing threats that compromisethoseconditions.
Work with landowners, land managers, and tribal governments to achieve desired habitat conditionsonlandsmanagedprimarilyforagriculture, forestry, subsistence, and other economic purposes.
Implementsite-specifichabitatrestorationandenhancementactionsdesignedtoincreasepopulationsofpriorityspecies.
Improvegeneticdiversityofpriorityspecies’populationsthroughspeciestranslocationsandreintroductions.
ACTION
StrategicFramework
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 16
STRENGTHEN CONSERVATIONINFRASTRUCTURE
Expanduseofeffectiveconservationtoolsanddeveloptheconservationworkforceneededtosupportimplementation.
INFORM CONSERVATIONEFFORTS THROUGH MONITORING AND RESEARCH
Improveunderstandingofmanagementeffectsonspeciesandhabitatconditions,aswellasspecies’populationstatusand limiting factors to prioritize actions thatwill bemostefficientandcost-effective.
EXPANDSOCIAL, POLITICAL,ANDFINANCIALSUPPORTFOR PRAIRIE-OAK CONSERVATION
Raise awareness to increase support for prairie-oak conser-vationandincreaseconservationcommitmentsandactionsin the private sector and at all levels of government.
PRIORITYACTIONS:
Increaseaccesstosharedconservationtoolssuchasspecializedequipmentandplantmaterials.
Strengthenorganizationalcapacityandexpertisetofosteraregionalnetworkofpractitionerswithuniquequalificationsandspecializedtraining.
Build a community-based workforce to support implementationofconservationactionsandleveragebenefitstolocaleconomies.
Monitor species and habitat response to restorationactionsandprogresstowardpopulationobjectives.
Determinelimitingfactorsforpersistenceofspecies and habitats.
Understandpotentialclimatechangeimpactstospecies’populationandhabitattargets.
Evaluatethecost-effectivenessofconservationactionsandshareinformationandlessonslearnedtosupportadaptivemanagement.
Advocateforpoliciesthatencourageconservationactionsandremovepolicybarriersthatinhibitconservationactions.
Buildrelationshipswithtribalsovereignnationstoadvancerestorationofvital,traditionalsubsistence resources.
Build a compelling case and educate policy makers about the important ecological and economic role of prairie-oak species and habitats andtheimplicationsoftheircontinuingdecline.
Advocate for increased investment and more strategictargetingofpublicandprivatefundinginhabitatconservation.
ACTION
StrategicFramework
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 17
ACTION
CostofRecoveryandRestoration In these graphics, we have estimated how we think resources will be needed by objectives and type of projects. These projections are presented to show the magnitude and distribution of the effort re-quired, and the range of opportunities for investments.
HABITATRESTORATION
41%
POPULATION RECOVERY
15%
4% INFASTRUCTURE AND CAPACITY
6% PUBLIC POLICY
RESEARCH AND MONITORING
34%
$55,250,000TOTAL NEED SPECIES RECOCVERY
TOTAL NEED FOR
SPECIES RECOVERY BY AREA
SPECIES RECOVERY
HABITATRESTORATION
79%
4% INFASTRUCTURE AND CAPACITY
RESEARCH AND MONITORING
17%
$27,812,500TOTAL NEED ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS
$11,500,000
TOTAL NEED FOR
ECOSYSTEM RESTORATIONBY AREA
GEORGIA BASIN$812,500
WILLAMETTE VALLEY
$8,125,000PUGET
LOWLANDS$4,625,000
EAST CASCADES $2,750,000
PUGET LOWLANDS$15,635,000
WILLAMETTE VALLEY$14,880,000
GEORGIA BASIN$13,495,000
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS
$6,850,000
EAST CASCADES
$4,390,000
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 18
ACTION
CostofRecoveryandRestoration
PUGET LOWLANDS
$20,260,00024%
GEORGIABASIN
$14,307,50017%
WILLAMETTE VALLEY$23,005,000
28%
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS
$18,350,00022%
EASTCASCADES $7,140,000
9%
$83,062,500SPECIES RECOVERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION
OBJECTIVE 1 + 2
Weenvisionimplementationoccurringinmanyforms,rangingfrommajor initiativesorcampaigns tosmaller-scaled regionaland local partnerships and projects.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 19
ACTION
MovingForward T heconservationeffortwearepromoting in thisdocu-ment is challenging, important, urgent, and – most sig-
nificantly–largeinscope.Itwilltakesignificantresourcestorebuildameaningfulandfunctionalprairie-oakecosystem.We estimate costs of approximately $83 million over thenext 10-15 years to achieve sustainability for the vulnerable speciesanddesiredhabitatconditionsacrossseveralecore-gions.Thisfigure isbasedonapproximationsofeffortandcosts by tasks from examples of species recovery and general prairie-oakrestorationanddoesnotincludehabitatprotec-tion.We fully recognize theneed forhabitatprotectionasaconservationstrategy,butconsider itanactivitythathasbeenandwillcontinuetobedonebyvariousagenciesandorganizationsasopportunitiespresentthemselvesindepen-dent of the impetus generated by this document for species recovery. Further, costs for habitat protections are highlyvariable within and among ecoregions (compared to habitat restoration),andthusdifficulttoprojectincostsanalyses.
→ Researchisasignificantneedforspeciesrecoverysinceweknowlittleaboutlimitingfactorsforthe41imperiled species.
→ Species recovery is a much greater need in the Georgia Depression, Puget Lowlands, and WillametteValleyecoregions;ecosystemrestorationis the dominant need in the Klamath Mountains and East Cascades ecoregions.
→ Thereisoverlapbetweenhabitatrestorationforspeciesrecoveryandgeneralhabitatrestorationfortheprairie-oakecosystem,sincehabitatrestorationfor species recovery is also helping to achieve ecosystemrestorationobjectives.
20
40
60
80
20
40
60
80
5 YEARS
TIME
10 YEARS
DO
LLA
RS
INV
ESTE
D (Millions)
AC
RES
RES
TOR
ED (Thousands)
SPECIES RECOVERED
SPECIES PREVENTED FROM LISTING
COSTPOINTS:
Thisconceptualfigureshowshowfinancialsupporttoaccomplishbusinessplanobjectivesofspeciesrecoveryandhabitatrestorationcanbecost-effective,rapid,andextensive.Greatestgainsareearlywheremulti-taxaandhabitatobjectivesoverlap,andlongestformostimperiledandmostuniquetaxa.
Populationrecoveryforindividualspecieswilltakemoreresourcesandtime,withthemostimperiledlistedspeciesandthemostsensitiveat-riskspeciestakingthemostresourcesandlongesttimetorecover.The visual demon-stratestheaddedvalueofthismulti-taxaapproach,whereindividualpopulationrecoverywillalsobenefitanumberofat-riskspecies.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 20
I n concert with the priority ac-tions, these complementary
strategies are intended to amplify theeffectivenessofourconserva-tionactionsthroughcollaborationwith private landowners, public outreach and community engage-ment,andimprovedcoordinationandtargetingofresourcestomax-imize the efficiency of conserva-tioninvestments.
Cross-CuttingStrategies
ACTION
MULTI-SPECIESAPPROACHES
ECOCULTURALANDTRADITIONAL
SUBSISTENCE
WORKING LANDSCAPES
PARTNER
COORDINATIONCOMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
WORKFORCEDEVELOPMENTAND
TRAINING
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Photos left to right: © South Sound Prairies 2011, Vines and Oaks © Creative Commons, Ann Schuster © South Sound Prairies 2015, © South South Prairies 2012, Thomas Munson, Moonjass © Creative Commons
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 21
WORKFORCEDEVELOPMENT ANDTRAININGTrain local foresters,practitioners, tribalmembers,andun-derservedcommunitiesinoakrestorationpractices.
Existing expertise in the Pacific Northwest often is rooted in timber management. Training current practitioners and developing new workforces with expertise needed to achieve ecological goals will expand social and economic opportunities in local communities.
WORKINGLANDSCAPESPartner with private landowners (ranchers, farmers, and timberlandownersamongothers)tomaintainandexpandthe habitat base for prairie-oak species that also gener-atesdirecteconomicbenefitsforlandownersandlocalcommunities.
Many prairie-oak species can persist on landscapes that support livestock grazing, commercial forestry, hunting, and other relatively low-intensity human uses. Landowner assistance and incentives to maintain these habitats and their traditional cultural values can reduce the need for costly land protection and restoration measures.
Cross-CuttingStrategies
ACTIONMULTI-SPECIESAPPROACHESTargetconservationinvestmentsanddesignprojectstobenefitmultipleprairie-oakspecieswhereappropriatetomanageecosystemsholisticallyandreduceper-speciesrecovery costs.
Habitat needs for at-risk species (e.g., endangered plants and butterflies) can often be addressed on sites where management can also contribute to broader conservation goals for birds and other wildlife with relatively little additional investment.
ECOCULTURALAND TRADITIONALSUBSISTENCEPartner with tribal sovereign governments to maintain and promoteculturalpracticesthatsustainfoodandwatersourcesandintegrityforfuturegenerations.
Traditional ecological knowledge provides historical and cultural insights that can be woven into oak restoration on all lands.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 22
Cross-CuttingStrategies
ACTION
COMMUNITYENGAGEMENTEngagediversecommunitiestoincreaseunderstandingofandsupportforconservationbyreconnectingpeopletoprairie-oak ecosystems, increasing public access for com-patiblerecreationandeducation,andfosteringvolunteerscience.
Few natural landscapes hold more intrinsic cultural appeal for people than prairie-oak habitats, which survive in many areas only as small fragments in urban and agricultural settings. Reconnecting people to this part of their natural heritage is critical to building public support for prairie-oak conservation.
ADAPTIVEMANAGEMENTInstitutionalizeeffectivenessmonitoringtosupportimplementationofconservationstrategiesandactions.Coordinatemonitoringtofillsharedinformationgaps,involvestakeholdersinprogrammaticevaluation,andpromotecollaborationindevelopingnewapproachestoimproveimplementation.
It is easy to celebrate successes, harder to acknowledge failures. Partners and stakeholders need to be able to learn from both and recalibrate their strategies to improve outcomes. Monitoring is critical to understanding why actions did or did not work, and a comprehensive approach is needed to improve and build on current practices.
PARTNERCOORDINATIONStrengthenrelationshipsandimprovenetworkingandcoordinationamongpartnersatmultiplelevelstoleveragefunding and communicate outcomes. Facilitate sharing of expertise,labor,andequipmenttoimproveefficiencyandreduce project costs.
Minor investments in coordination and communications can generate significant cost savings for partners and funders as conservation efforts are scaled up.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 23
COORDINATION
Partnerships A handful of local and ecoregional partnerships focus on coordination of prairie-oak conservation work within
thePacificNorthwest.Thesepartnershipsprovideavehiclefor coordinated implementation of on-the-ground effortsbyindividualagenciesandorganizations,outreach,andad-vocacy for funding and policy. Partnerswith scientific andtechnicalexpertisehelpshapeconservationdesignandassistwith monitoring and research. A broad range of funders – in-cludingprivatefoundations,individualandcorporatedonors,andlocal,stateandfederalagencies–providefinancialsup-portthroughgrants,programmaticinvestmentsandin-kindcontributions.
Initialwork by Pacific Birds, CPOP, and other partnerswillfocus on organizing additional local partnerships including
the Northwest California Oak Network, the WillametteValley Oak and Prairie Cooperative, the East CascadesOak Network, and the Intertwine Alliance Oak and Prairie Working Group; strategic planning for those partnerships; development of policy, funding, and outreach strategies; and expandingandimprovingcommunicationsamongpartners.Fundraising effortswill seek to expand capacity for imple-mentationofthesestrategiesthroughthelocalpartnerships.
Highlighted in the following section are Success Storiesthat are strong examples of projects and the power of partnerships.
CASCADIAPRAIRIE-OAKPARTNERSHIP
CPOPfacilitatesinformationsharingandbringsto-gethertheprairie-oakconservationcommunityoftheWillametteValley,PugetTrough,andGeorgiaBasin ecoregions through workshops, confer-ences, and online resources. CPOP’s website is the primary clearinghouse for technical informationsharingaroundprairie-oakconservationinthere-gion. The partnership also maintains a 700-mem-berlistservthatsupportsdialogueonrestorationand research. CPOP is coordinated by the Center for Natural Lands Management.
KLAMATH-SISKIYOUOAKNETWORK
The Klamath Siskiyou Oak Network conserves oak habitats on private and public lands in southern
Oregon and northern California. The collabo-rative regional partnership provides a forumfor education and community engagement;encourages science, adaptive management,anddevelopmentofbestmanagementpractic-
es; and integrates social, economic, and eco-cul-turalperspectives intoourunderstandingofoak plantcommunities.
PACIFICBIRDSHABITATJOINTVENTURE
Pacific Birds is an international partnership offederal, state, provincial, local, and non-govern-mentalorganizationswith a25-year recordofsuccessinadvancinglarge-scaleeffortstocon-serve important habitats for migratory birds from the north coast of California to Alaska and islandhabitatsinthePacific,includingHawaii.
Photo: Bruce Taylor PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 24
OUTCOMESFORPEOPLE
C onservationofprairie-oakhabitatsisimportantnotonlyforimperiledspeciesandthelegacyofanaturalheritage,butalsoforpeoplethroughoutthePacific
Northwest. A functioning prairie-oak ecosystem provides numerous other valuesandservicesthatbenefitsociety,including:
Open space and scenic values, reduced stress, improved quality of life
Recreation opportunities,
including birding, photography, hiking,
nature watching, hunting
Native American cultural resource
harvest
Forage production and shade for cattle and
other livestock
Wood and other forest products
Increased property values
Improved air quality, oxygen production and
carbon storage
Improved water quality, with reduced
runoff and erosion
Photo:NaturalResourceConservationService
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 25
SUCCESS STORIES
ENLISTINGTHEWINEINDUSTRYINPRAIRIE-OAKCONSERVATIONFocusingprimarilyonthewineindustry,theWillametteValleyOakAccord brings together landowners around a commitment to protect and restore some of the last remaining oak habitat in the region. The voluntary agreement is inspired by local landowners’ vision for management of vineyards and forestland in harmony with healthy, resilientoakhabitat.Signatoriesofthe�ccordcommittoundertakinga baseline assessment of oak habitat on their property and then to improvinghabitatconditionthrougheitheronsiteoroffsiterestoration.Periodicassessmentswillhelplandownerstoquantifythebenefitsoftheirstewardshipactivitiesandcommunicatetheircommitmenttooakconservation.LedbytheWillamettePartnership,theaccordcreatesamechanismtointroducecurrentandnewWillametteValleylandownerstotheimportanceofoakwoodlandandprairieconservation,andcreates a stewardship standard for land managers and owners. Leaders hopetohave50landownerssignedupandimplementingrestorationactivitieswithinthenextthreeyears.
CreativeCommons©
OaksandVines
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 26
SUCCESS STORIES
IMPROVINGOAKRESTORATIONSUCCESSTHROUGHADAPTIVEMANAGEMENTOverthepastfiveyears,theKlamathSiskiyouOakNetwork(KSON)partnershiphasspent$3millionrestoringmorethan3,000acresofoak woodland across federal and private lands in southern Oregon andnorthernCalifornia,withanadditional$4.65millionsecuredforrestorationofanadditional3,400acres.Thepartnershipispursuinganadaptivemanagementstrategythatreliesonbothimplementationreviewandeffectivenessmonitoringtoquantifyhowspeciesrespondtovegetationchangesassociatedwithrestorationpractices.Forexample,asbirdshavewellestablishedhabitatrelationships,respondquicklytohabitat change, and are easily surveyed, biologists can reliably monitor changesinoakhabitatconditionsbymonitoringchangesintheoak-associatedsongbirdcommunities.KSONpartnershavealsoinitiatedlong-termmonitoringtobetterunderstandrestorationoutcomesunderfuture climate change scenarios. Monitoring change and measuring successwillinformfuturerestorationprojects.
MeredithRafferty©
SouthSoundPrairies
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 27
SUCCESS STORIES
REMOVINGPOLICYBARRIERSTOOAKRESTORATIONINCALIFORNIAIn northwestern California, where invading conifers are one of the biggestthreatstotheregion’soakwoodlands,habitatrestorationeffortshavelongbeenhinderedbyregulatoryrestrictions.Landownerswhowerewillingtoworkthroughlongandexpensivepermittingprocessestoremoveconifersfromtheiroakwoodlandsoftenfacedrequirementsto replant conifers to replace the ones they wanted to cut. Thanks to theeffortsofmembersoftheNorthwesternCaliforniaOaksNetworkandareceptivestatelegislator,thoseroadblockshavenowbeenremoved. The California Board of Forestry adopted new rules in July 2016thateliminaterequirementsforreplantingofconiferswhentimberharvests are designed to restore oak woodlands in northern California. Legislationspecificallyauthorizingtheexemptionwonfinalapprovalandwas signed into law in September 2016.
Photo: Bruce Taylor
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 28
SUCCESS STORIES
SCALINGUPFORMOREAFFORDABLESEEDWith funding support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department ofDefense,andconservationpartners,andincooperationwithEvergreen’s Sustainability in Prisons Project, the Center for Natural LandsManagement(CNLM)hasbuiltaconservationnurseryprogramthatprovidesnativeseedtopartnersthroughouttheSouthSound.Thephysicalinfrastructurerequiredtoproducenativeseedissubstantial.Byhavingacentralizedcomplexofseedfields,greenhouses,equipment,seedcleaningfacilities,andstorage,CNLMhasbeenabletoachieveaneconomyofscale,makingseedavailableatamoreaffordablecosttothemultipleconservationpartnersimplementingprairieandoakconservationintheSouthSound.Inrecentyears,theconservationnurseryhasexpandedtoprovideseedtoadditionalregionsbyobtaininggeneticallyappropriateseedsourcesandimplementinggrow-outinaseparatefield.Thismaintainsthegeneticmaterialoftheregionalseedbututilizestheequipmentandprocessinginfrastructurethathelpskeepcosts low.
MeredithRafferty©
SouthSoundPrairies
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 29
SUCCESS STORIES
WORKINGONALANDSCAPESCALETOBENEFITMULTIPLESPECIESTheU.S.FishandWildlifeService’sCompetitiveStateWildlifeGrantprovidesfundingtostateagenciesandpartnerstosupportactionsoutlinedinStateWildlifeActionPlans(SWAPs).WashingtonDepartmentof Fish and Wildlife and Oregon Department of Fish Wildlife, along with The Center for Natural Land Management and the American Bird Conservancy applied for and received two rounds of funding to implementhabitatrestoration,standardizedmonitoring,andoutreachtoconservationpartnersandthepublic,withafocusonprairie-oakhabitats and species. This funding allowed the two state agencies to partnerwithovertennon-profitandlocalagenciestoimplementworkon a landscape scale, working together to share strategies, methods, and information,andtobenefitover20bird,butterfly,andmammalSpeciesofGreatestConservationNeedacrossmultiplesites.
Photo: Elspeth Kim
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 30
There are a number of steps involved with gathering and processing acorns including gathering, drying, grinding, and leaching. Rocks like this were used by Native Americans to grind acorns and other seeds into meal, slowly forming depressions in the stone.
Anne Schuster © South Sound Prairies 2015
FolsomNaturals©
CreativeCommons
SUCCESS STORIES
INDIGENOUSRESTORATIONOFOAKHABITATS IN SHASTA COUNTYCALIFORNIAThroughacollaborativepartnershipbetweentheIllmawiBandofthePitRiverTribeandLomakatsiRestorationProject,partnersarerestoring California black oak and Oregon white oak habitats in Northern California. Located on Illmawi ancestral lands, tribal crews are enhancing oakresiliencebyremovingencroachingconifersandreducingwildfireriskthatwouldimpactacorncrops.Theaboriginalfireprocessisbeingreintroducedandherbaceousunderstoryrestorationimplemented.Objectivesfocusonsurvivalofboththeindigenousoakecosystemandculturalbeneficialuseofresources.Twenty-fourtribalmembershavebeen employed by Lomakatsi over the past three years restoring this ecocultural oak landscape.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 31
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRIORITY PRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 1. PART 01/03
SPECIES
U.S. FEDERAL CANADA SPECIES AT RISK WASHINGTON OREGON BRITISH COLUMBIA
MAMMALS
HERPTILES
BIRDS
KEY:
Endangered
Threatened
Candidate
E
E
E E ET
T
T T T RC
C
C C C B
Mazama Pocket Gopher (4 subspecies)
Columbian White-tailed Deer
Western Gray Squirrel
Gray-tailed Vole
Western Pond Turtle
PacificGopherSnake
Sharp-tailed Snake
California Mountain Kingsnake
Streaked Horned Lark
Oregon Vesper Sparrow
Lewis’s Woodpecker
Slender-billed White-breasted Nuthatch
Common Nighthawk
1
*
*
*
*
*
*=Extirpated(breedingstatusforbirds)
1 onlyappliestoColumbiaRiverpopulation
Priority species are those listed as endangered, threatened, or candidate at federal, state, or provincial levels.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 32
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRIORITY PRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 1. PART 02/03
SPECIES
U.S. FEDERAL CANADA SPECIES AT RISK WASHINGTON OREGON BRITISH COLUMBIA
BUTTERFLIES
PLANTS
INVERTEBRATES
KEY:
Endangered
Threatened
Candidate
E
E
E E ET
T
T T T RC
C
C C C B
Taylor’s Checkerspot
Fender’s Blue
Island Marble
Island Blue
Mardon Skipper
Puget Blue
Valley Silverspot
Willamette Daisy
Bradshaw’s Lomatium
Golden Paintbrush
Kincaid’s Lupine
Nelson’s Checkermallow
Deltoid Balsamroot
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
*=Extirpated(breedingstatusforbirds)
1 onlyappliestoColumbiaRiverpopulation
*
*
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 33
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRIORITY PRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 1. PART 03/03
SPECIES
U.S. FEDERAL CANADA SPECIES AT RISK WASHINGTON OREGON BRITISH COLUMBIA
PLANTS(...CONTINUED)
KEY:
Endangered
Threatened
Candidate
E
E
E E ET
T
T T T RC
C
C C C B
Fragrant Popcornflower
White-topped Aster
Small-flowered Tonella
Yellow Montane Violet
Gentner's Fritillaria
Large-flowered Wooly Meadow-foam
Cook's Lomatium
Rough Popcorn Flower
Pale Larkspur
Willamette Valley Larkspur
Peacock Larkspur
Shaggy Horkelia
White Meconella
Marigold Navarretia
*=Extirpated(breedingstatusforbirds)
1 onlyappliestoColumbiaRiverpopulation
*
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 34
ECOREGIONAL POPULATION STATUS OF PRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 2. PART 01/03
SPECIES
GEORGIADEPRESSION
PUGETLOWLANDS
WILLAMETTEVALLEY
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS EAST
CASCADES
MAMMALS
ECOREGION
BIRDS
HERPTILES
KEY:
Extirpationornear-extirpation(breedingstatusforbirds)withreintroductionpotential(somehavebeeninitiated)
Substantialpopulationdeclinesand/orsmall,vulnerablepopulations;recoveryneeded
Populationsgenerallystable;norecoveryemphasisneededatthistime
*Blank cells indicate range generally does not include this ecoregion
Mazama Pocket Gopher (4 subspecies)
Columbian White-tailed Deer
Western Gray Squirrel
Gray-tailed Vole
Streaked Horned Lark
Oregon Vesper Sparrow
Lewis’s Woodpecker
Slender-billed White-breasted Nuthatch
Common Nighthawk
Western Pond Turtle
Pacific Gopher Snake
Sharp-tailed Snake
California Mountain Kingsnake
NORTH SOUTH NORTH SOUTH UMPQUA ROGUE/CA
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 35
ECOREGIONAL POPULATION STATUS OF PRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 2. PART 02/03
SPECIES
GEORGIADEPRESSION
PUGETLOWLANDS
WILLAMETTEVALLEY
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS EAST
CASCADES
BUTTERFLIES
INVERTEBRATES
PLANTS
KEY:
Extirpationornear-extirpation(breedingstatusforbirds)withreintroductionpotential(somehavebeeninitiated)
Substantialpopulationdeclinesand/orsmall,vulnerablepopulations;recoveryneeded
Populationsgenerallystable;norecoveryemphasisneededatthistime
*Blank cells indicate range generally does not include this ecoregion
Taylor’s Checkerspot
Fender’s Blue
Island Marble
Island Blue
Mardon Skipper
Puget Blue
Valley Silverspot
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
Willamette Daisy
Bradshaw’s Lomatium
Golden Paintbrush
Kincaid’s Lupine
Nelson’s Checkermallow
Deltoid Balsamroot
NORTH SOUTH NORTH SOUTH UMPQUA ROGUE/CA
ECOREGION
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 36
ECOREGIONAL POPULATION STATUS OF PRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 2. PART 03/03
SPECIES
GEORGIADEPRESSION
PUGETLOWLANDS
WILLAMETTEVALLEY
KLAMATH MOUNTAINS EAST
CASCADES
PLANTS(...CONTINUED)
KEY:
Extirpationornear-extirpation(breedingstatusforbirds)withreintroductionpotential(somehavebeeninitiated)
Substantialpopulationdeclinesand/orsmall,vulnerablepopulations;recoveryneeded
Populationsgenerallystable;norecoveryemphasisneededatthistime
*Blank cells indicate range generally does not include this ecoregion
Fragrant Popcornflower
White-topped Aster
Small-flowered Tonella
Yellow Montane Violet
Gentner's Fritillaria
Large-flowered Wooly Meadow-foam
Cook's Lomatium
Rough Popcorn Flower
Pale Larkspur
Willamette Valley Larkspur
Peacock Larkspur
Shaggy Horkelia
White Meconella
Marigold Navarretia
NORTH SOUTH NORTH SOUTH UMPQUA ROGUE /CA
ECOREGION
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 37
GENERAL HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 3. PART 01/03
SPECIESWET PRAIRIE UPLAND PRAIRIE OAK-SAVANNA
OPEN OAK WOODLAND
CLOSED OAK WOODLAND
OAK FOREST OAK CONIFER
MAMMALS
HERPTILES
BIRDS
HABITATTYPE
Mazama Pocket Gopher (4 subspecies)
Columbian White-tailed Deer
Western Gray Squirrel
Gray-tailed Vole
Western Pond Turtle
Pacific Gopher Snake
Sharp-tailed Snake
California Mountain Kingsnake
Streaked Horned Lark
Oregon Vesper Sparrow
Lewis’s Woodpecker
Slender-billed White-breasted Nuthatch
Common Nighthawk
KEY:
Habitattypethattypicallyhashighestoccurrence/densityifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
Habitattypethathasregularoroccasionaloccurrenceifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
*Blank cells indicate species generally does not occur in this habitat type
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 38
GENERAL HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 3. PART 02/03
SPECIESWET PRAIRIE UPLAND PRAIRIE OAK-SAVANNA
OPEN OAK WOODLAND
CLOSED OAK WOODLAND
OAK FOREST OAK CONIFER
BUTTERFLIES
PLANTS
INVERTEBRATES
HABITATTYPE
Taylor’s Checkerspot
Fender’s Blue
Island Marble
Island Blue
Mardon Skipper
Puget Blue
Valley Silverspot
Willamette Daisy
Bradshaw’s Lomatium
Golden Paintbrush
Kincaid’s Lupine
Nelson’s Checkermallow
Deltoid Balsamroot
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
KEY:
Habitattypethattypicallyhashighestoccurrence/densityifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
Habitattypethathasregularoroccasionaloccurrenceifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
*Blank cells indicate species generally does not occur in this habitat type
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 39
GENERAL HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OFPRIORITYPRAIRIE-OAKSPECIESTABLE 3. PART 03/03
SPECIESWET PRAIRIE UPLAND PRAIRIE OAK-SAVANNA
OPEN OAK WOODLAND
CLOSED OAK WOODLAND
OAK FOREST OAK CONIFER
PLANTS(...CONTINUED)
HABITATTYPE
Fragrant Popcornflower
White-topped Aster
Small-flowered Tonella
Yellow Montane Violet
Gentner's Fritillaria
Large-flowered Wooly Meadow-foam
Cook's Lomatium
Rough Popcorn Flower
Pale Larkspur
Willamette Valley Larkspur
Peacock Larkspur
Shaggy Horkelia
White Meconella
Marigold Navarretia
KEY:
Habitattypethattypicallyhashighestoccurrence/densityifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
Habitattypethathasregularoroccasionaloccurrenceifhabitatconditionsaresuitableandwithinspeciesrange
*Blank cells indicate species generally does not occur in this habitat type
NOTE: Species may also occur in other habitats that are not addressed here (e.g., riparian, wetlands).NOTE: Wet prairie also includes vernal pools.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 40
LiteratureCited
Alverson,E.R.2005.Recoveringprairiesandsavannasinaseaofforest:aconservationchallengeinthePacificNorthwest. Plant Talk 40:23-27.
Christy,J.,E.Alverson,M.Dougherty,S.Kolar,L.Ashkenas,andP.Minnear.1999.Pre-settlementvegetationmapforthe WillametteValley,Oregon,compiledfromrecordsoftheGeneralLandOfficeSurveyors(c.1850).Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland, OR.
Crawford, R.C. and H. Hall. 1997. Changes in the South Puget prairie landscape. Pp. 11-16 in P.V. Dunn and K. Ewing (editors) EcologyandconservationoftheSouthPugetSoundprairielandscape.TheNatureConservancy,SeattleWA. 289 pp.
Defenders of Wildlife. 1998. Oregon’s Living Landscape. Defenders of Wildlife, West Linn, Oregon. 218 pp.
Lea, T. 2002. Historical Garry oak ecosystems of greater Victoria and Saanich Peninsula – a 1:20,000 Map. In P. J. Burton (editor),GarryOakEcosystemRestoration:ProgressandPrognosis.Proceedingsofthethirdannualmeetingofthe BritishColumbiachapteroftheSocietyforEcologicalRestoration,April27-28,2002.UniversityofVictoria,British Columbia. Pp. 24-27.
Omernik,J.M.1987.EcoregionsoftheconterminousUnitedStates.Map(scale1:7,500,000).AnnalsoftheAssociationof American Geographers 77(1):118-125.
PublicForestryFoundation.1995.ForestmanagementstrategyfortheFortLewisMilitaryReservation.PreparedforU.S. ArmyI-Corps,FortLewisMilitaryReservation,EnvironmentalandNaturalResourcesDivision,ForestryBranch,and The Nature Conservancy of Washington. Eugene, Oregon.
TheNatureConservancy[TNC]andJ.Kreuger.2013.UmpquaPrairieOakPartnershipConservationStrategy.TheNature Conservancy, Portland, OR. 11 pp.
T. S. Keter. 1989. Overview of the Prehistoric and Historic: Grasslands of the North Fork Basin of the Eel River. Presented at the 23rdAnnualMeetingofTheSocietyforCaliforniaArchaeology.SixRiversNationalForest,Eureka,CA.
PRAIRIE, OAKS, AND PEOPLE 41
DESIGN BY UPTHENTIC CREATIVE, INC. UPTHENTIC.COM