oer.ibbu.edu.ng · web viewimpact of management development on organizational commitment: (evid....
TRANSCRIPT
IMPACT OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT:
(EVIDENCE FROM IBB UNIVERSITY, LAPAI)
BY
ABDULSALAM ABDULLAHI
U10/FMS/BUS/083
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL
SCIENCES
IBRAHIM BADAMASI BABANGIDA UNIVERSITY,
LAPAI, NIGER STATE
OCTOBER, 2014
1
IMPACT OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: EVIDENCE FROM IBB UNIVERSITY, LAPAI
BY
ABDULSALAM ABDULLAHI
(U10/FMS/BUS/083)
A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, IBRAHIM BADAMASI BABANGIDA UNIVERSITY, LAPAI, NIGER STATE
2
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this document represent the report of a research conducted by
me for the award of Degree in Business Administration and that, to the best of my
knowledge, it contains no material previously published by another person, no
material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree of the University.
Authors cited in the report are duly acknowledged. All errors are mine.
………………………………… …….………………
Abdulsalam Abdullahi Date
U10/FMS/BUS/083
08039293304, 08074832583
3
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that this research project titled “Impact of Management
Development on Organizational Commitment” conducted and written by
Abdulsalam Abdullahi (U10/FMS/BUS/083) was duly supervised, read and
approved as meeting the requirement for the award of Bachelor of Science Degree in
Business Administration in Department of Business Administration in Ibrahim
Badamasi University, Lapai.
…………………………………. ....….……………
Mohammed A. Mawoli Date
(PROJECT SUPERVISOR)
…………………………………. ....….……………
Mohammed A. Mawoli Date
(HEAD OF DEPARTMENT)
…………………………………. ....….……………
EXTENAL EXAMINER Date
4
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to my late Mom (Hajiya Hafsat Abdulsalam Raji) and to my
late Sisters (Halima Abdulsalam and Medina Abdulsalam).
5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My sincere appreciation and gratitude goes to Almighty Allah for his total
protection, guidance, favour and for providing me the wisdom, knowledge and
understanding needed for the completion of this degree program.
This research work would not have come to a triumphant end without thorough
supervision, I wish to express my unreserved appreciation to my humble, efficient
and capable supervisor, Mal. Mohammed A. Mawoli a.k.a (Global Mobile
Encyclopaedia of Research Study) for the resourceful and immeasurable support
given to me, and whose criticism, professional guidance and suggestions upgraded
this work to this standard.
My special appreciation also goes to my mentor and role model Mallam Nuhu
A. Ango for his advice, support and for his word of encouragement. Sir, I am very
grateful. My special gratitude also goes to the entire staff of Business Administration
Department with particular reference to Mal. Mohammed A. Mawoli, Mal. Nuhu A.
Ango, Mal. Abdullahi Baba Yusuf, Alhaji Raji I. Adam, Mal. Ndagi Sayedi, Mr.
Emmanuel T., Mal. Bashir D.S., Mr. Gabriel S., Dr. Mathew O. Fashagba, Dr. Jamiu
A. and Dr. J.K Yere for building me.
My unquantifiable and countless appreciation go to the best siblings in the
world, Hajiya Fati Abdulsalam Zubairu, Mrs. Zainab Abdulsalam Abukabar,
Mallama Sekina Abdulsalam Hashim and Mal. Abdul Abdulsalam and not forgetting
my lovely nieces (Aisha Abdulsalam and Halima Abdulsalam) for their care, love
advice, supplications and support throughout the struggle, may Almighty Allah grant
you all your heart desires. Ameen.
My special appreciation also goes to Mal. Haruna N. Yahaya for his fatherly
advice and support and also to the most prudent and dedicated Manager, Mr. Edwin
A. Olumese for their word of encouragement and to the entire staffs of Haruna
Yahaya & Co. Thank you all.6
Finally, my appreciation goes to my in laws, family friends and friends with
special reference to Mal. Abukakar A. A., Alhaji Zubairu Abdulkareem, Amina
Muhammad Kudu (Mimi), Hussain Dauda, Hussain Rukaya, Tanko Emmanuel,
Ibrahim Adejuwon Bello (Jaywon), Zubairu Mohammed Sokomba (CNA),
Mohammed Abdulsalam (HOD), Babawusa Alhassan, Maimuna Yunusa (Tumsy),
Jibrin B. Haruna, Abubakar Aminu, Alao Adekola Oluwaseun, Mal. Muhammad
Muhammad Musa, Yakubu Momoh (Rep.), Yahaya Kudirat Abiola, Muhammad
Bagudu, Olayemi Yusuf (Bale), conclusively to the entire Business Administration
class of 2014. My God continue to be with us all. Ameen.
7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page - - - - - - - - - - - -i
Certification Page - - - - - - - - - - -ii
Certification Page - - - - - - - - - - -iii
Dedication Page - - - - - - - - - - -iv
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - - - -v-vi
Table of Contents - - - - - - - - - - -vii-x
List of Tables- - - - - - - - - - - - xi-xii
Abstract- - - - - - - - - - - - - xiii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the study - - - - - - - - - 1-2
1.2 Statement of the problem - - - - - - - - 2-4
1.3 Aim and objectives of the study - - - - - - - 4
1.4 Research questions - - - - - - - - - 4-5
1.5 Hypothesis - - - - - - - - - - - 5
1.6 Significance of the study - - - - - - - - - 5
1.7 Scope of the study - - - - - - - - - - 5-6
1.8 Limitation of the study - - - - - - - - - 6
1.9 Definition of Terms - - - - - - - - - 6-7
1.10 Scheme of Chapters - - - - - - - - - 7
8
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - 8
2.2 Concept of Management Development - - - - - - 8-10
2.2.1 Formal Approaches to Management Development - - - - - 10-11
2.2.2 Informal Approaches to Management Development - - - - 11-12
2.2.3 The Integrated Approach to Management Development - - - 12
2.3 Rationale for Management Development - - - - - - 12-13
2.4 Types of Management Development Programmes - - - - - 13
2.4.1 Career Development - - - - - - - - - 13-15
2.4.1.1 Roles Management can play in Career development - - - - 15-16
2.4.2 Outdoor Management Development Programmes - - - - 17
2.4.3 Management Development - - - - - - - - 17-18
2.5 Steps in Management Development - - - - - - - 18-19
2.6 The Concept of Organizational Commitment - - - - - 19-21
2.6.1 Commitment and Work Behaviour - - - - - - - 21-23
2.6.2 Organisational Citizenship Behaviour - - - - - - - 23-27
2.6.3 Managing Employees Organizational Commitment - - - - - 27-29
2.7 Types of Organizational Commitment - - - - - - 29-31
2.8 Factors Contributing to organizational Commitment - - - - 31-35
2.9 The Impact of Management Development on Organizational
Commitment- - - - - - - - - - - 35-37
2.10 Historical Background of IBB University - - - - - - 37-40
9
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - - - 41
3.2 Research Design - - - - - - - - - - 41
3.3 Population of the Study - - - - - - - - - 41-42
3.4 Sample Size and Sampling Techniques - - - - - - 42-44
3.5 Instrument for Data Collection - - - - - - - 44-45
3.6 Measurement of Variables - - - - - - - - 45
3.7 Methods of Data Analysis - - - - - - - - 45
3.8 Model Specification - - - - - - - - - 45-46
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - - - 474.2 Questionnaire Distribution and Retrieval - - - - - - 47
4.3 Demographic and Socio-economic Variables of the Respondents- - - 47
4.3.1 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Gender - - - - 48
4.3.2 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Age- - - - - 48
4.3.3 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Marital Status - - - 49
4.3.4 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Education- - - - 49
4.3.5 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Length of Service in IBBUL- - - - - - - - - - 50
4.3.6 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of ManagerialPosition - - - - - - - - - - - - 50
4.4 Whether the Respondents Acquired their Highest Academic Qualification while Working in IBBUL- - - - - - - 51
4.5 Whether the Respondents had sponsored themselves for Staff Development Programmes while Working for/in IBBUL - - - - 51
4.6 Why Respondents choose to Sponsored themselves for 10
Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL - - - 52
4.7 Whether IBBUL had ever sponsored the Respondents for any Staff Development programmes- - - - - - - 52-53
4.8 Whether Respondents benefit from Staff Development Programmes Regularly- - - - - - - - - - 53-54
4.9 Whether Staff Development Programmes attended by Respondents are sponsored by TETF or IBBUL- - - - - 54-55
4.10 Effectiveness of Management Development- - - - - - 55-56
4.11 Level of Organization Commitment- - - - - - - 57
4.11.1 Level of Affective Organization Commitment- - - - - - 57
4.11.2 Level of Continuance Organization Commitment- - - - - 58-59
4.11.3 Level of Normative Organization Commitment- - - - - 59-60
4.11.4 Summary of Organization Commitment (Affective, Normative and Continuance) - - - - - - - - - - 61
4.12 Effect of Management Development on Organisation Commitment to Work- - - - - - - - - - 62-63
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - - - - 64
5.2 Conclusions - - - - - - - - - - - 64-65
5.3 Recommendations- - - - - - - - - - 65-66
5.4 Suggestion for further studies - - - - - - - - 66
References- - - - - - - - - - - - 67-68
Appendices- - - - - - - - - - - 69-74
11
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Offices of the Management Team of IBBUL - - - - - 42
Table 3.2: Population and Sample Size of the Management Staff of IBBUL- - - - - - - - - - 44
Table 4.1: Distribution and Retrieval of Copies of Questionnaire Administered- - - - - - - - - - 47
Table 4.2: Gender of Respondents - - - - - - - - 48
Table 4.3: Age Distribution of the Respondents- - - - - - 48
Table 4.4: Marital Status of the Respondents - - - - - - 49
Table 4.5: Education Distribution of the Respondents - - - - - 49
Table 4.6:Duration of Work of the Respondents - - - -- 50
Table 4.7: Current Managerial Position occupy by the Respondents - - - 50
Table 4.8: Whether Member of the IBBUL Management Team Acquired their Highest Academic Qualification while Working in IBBUL- - - - - - - - - 51
Table 4.9: Self sponsor for Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL - - - - - - - - 51
Table 4.10: Why Respondents Choose to Sponsor themselves for Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL - - - 52
Table 4.11: Whether IBBUL had ever sponsored Respondents for any staff development programmes - - - - - 53
Table 4.12: How often do the Respondents benefitted from Staff Development Programmes?- - - - - - - - - - 54
Table 4.13: Are the Staff Development Programmes attended by Respondents sponsored by TETF or IBBUL? - - - - 55
Table 4.14: Effectiveness of Management Development - - - - - 56
Table 4.15: Extent of Affective Organization Commitment by the IBBUL Management Staff - - - - - - - 58
Table 4.16: Extent of Continuance Organization Commitment by the IBBUL Management Staff - - - - - - - 59
Table 4.17: Extent of Normative Organization Commitment by the IBBUL Management Staff - - - - - - - 60
12
Table 4.18: Extent of Organization Commitment by the IBBUL Management Staff - - - - - - - - - 62
Table 4.19 Effect of Management Development on Organisation Commitment - 63
13
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to examine the impact of management development on organization commitment to work in Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai. The methodology that was used for the study was survey. Primary data was collected from a sample of fourty (40) management teams. Self- administered questionnaire was used in the collection of data; data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (such as frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation and Regression). Findings of the study revealed that Management development has no positive impact on organization commitment to work, also the study revealed that management teams of IBB University have average commitment to work and they considered management development to be very effective. Based on the above findings, the study recommends that for IBB University, Lapai to excel as the first choice University in Africa, management must empower all departments to engage in development of staff to build potential and strengthen staff competencies.
14
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Management development is a key contributor to an institution’s competitive
advantage, helps develop managerial talent, and allows managements to take
responsibility for their careers. Management development is a necessary component
of an institution’s efforts to compete in the new economy, and to meet the challenges
in work design. Management development is a key to ensuring that managements
have the competencies necessary to serve the institution in achieving the aims and
objectives. Management development is also important to ensure that institutions
have the managerial talent needed to successfully execute a growth strategy.
Essentially, Management development could enhance employee commitment
to the organization and boost its overall performance. Becker (1993) and Brum
(2008) theorized that training and development are antecedents of employee
commitment. Li, Cannon and Wong (2014) found that career development has
significant influence on employee commitment.
Biljana (2004) stated that the commitment of employees is an important issue
because it may be used to predict employee’s performance, absenteeism and other
behaviours. Management development refers to a systematically planned,
comprehensive set of professional learning opportunities carried out over time to
achieve specific district-wide, campus, and department improvement objectives, and
also, refers to the processes, programs and activities through which every
organization develops, enhances and improves the skills, competencies and overall
performance of its employees and workers.
15
Newstrom and Davies (2002) define employee’s organizational commitment as
the degree to which an employee identifies with an institution and wants to continue
actively participating in it. Like a strong magnetic force attracting one metallic object
to another, it is a measure of the employees’ willingness to remain with a firm or an
institution in the future. It often reflects the employees’ belief in the mission and
goals of an institution, willingness to expend effort in their accomplishment, and
intentions to continue working there. Commitment is usually stronger among longer-
term employees, those who have experienced personal success in the organization,
and those working with a committed employee group.
Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai (IBBUL), is a public
university owned by Niger State Government with the mandate to produce high
quality and globally competitive human capital at internationally recognized and
competitive levels of University Education that will lead the process of socio-
economic and political engineering of Niger State and Nigeria. The realization of
IBBUL’s mandate is, no doubt, dependent on competent (i.e. well trained and
developed manpower) as well as committed staff. Thus, this study is aimed at
verifying the impact of management development on organizational commitment in
IBBUL.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Universities all over the world are considered as the main agent of socio-
economic, political, and technological change and development through the activities
of knowledge production and reproduction (i.e research), knowledge storage (i.e
library), knowledge delivery (i.e teaching) and knowledge application (i.e community
service). The Universities are uniquely staffed with academic staff and non-academic
staff; the academic staff handle teaching, research and community services on the one
hand, while the non-academic staff handle administrative matters ranging from
revenue and salary, maintenance of building and facilities, inventory procurement
and management, employee recruitment and management, sanitation, and health
16
services among others. Due to these peculiarities, universities’ management team are
usually drawn from the academic and non-academic staff. The Vice-Chancellors, the
Deputy Vice-Chancellor, the Chief Librarian, The Deans and the Head of
Departments represent the academics in the management, while the Registrars,
Bursars, Academic Secretary and Directors represent the administrative arm of the
institution in the management.
Members of management team in university systems may be either promoted
or appointed into managerial roles because they exhibited strong performance as
academicians and administrators at technical levels. The shift from technical roles to
strategic roles presents new challenges that require new knowledge to tackle through
management development programmes. However, most public organizations provide
no formal management development programme for its new managers and no
“refresher” training for existing managers or high-potential employees (Grensing-
Pophal, 2002). Arguably, the situation in the Nigerian Public universities is not
different from the one described by Grensing-Pophal (2002), more so that the
Nigerian public universities are grossly underfunded whereas management
development programmes are capitally intensive.
Funds for management development in the Nigerian universities can be
sourced internally and externally. The basic and permanent source of funding
management development ought to be internally based (i.e within the university)
while external sources are supposed to be secondary and temporary alternatives that
the university can leverage on. The researcher has rather observed that Nigerian
Universities have relied heavily on Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETF) for staff
training and development and commit very little or no internal resources to staff
training and development. Thus, this study seeks to examine, among others, the
importance IBBUL attach to management development in terms of funding and
programmes. This is expedient because management development could enhance
managers’ performance in terms of influencing employees to greater productivity for
the attainment of the much desired organizational goals.
17
Importantly, available empirical literature shows that previous researchers paid
much research attention on the relationship between training and employee
productivity/performance, training and employee commitment, and other related
topics where training was used as the independent variable while the issue of
management development and its attendant impact on organizational commitment has
been widely neglected. This has left a wide gap in empirical literature. Thus, the need
for this study.
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of management development on
organizational commitment in IBBUL. However, this study seeks to achieve the
following objectives:
i. To determine the extent to which management staff of Ibrahim Badamasi
Babangida University, Lapai are exposed to periodic development through
internally and externally funded programmes;
ii. To evaluate the level of organization commitment by the Management team of
Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai.
iii. To examine the impact of management development on organisation
commitment in Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai.
1.4 Research Questions
The following research questions shall guide this study:
i. To what extent is the management team of IBB University exposed to periodic
development using internally and externally sourced fund?
ii. What is the level of organization commitment by the management staff of IBB
University, Lapai?
18
iii. How does management development influence organizational commitment in
IBB University, Lapai?
1.5 Hypothesis
For the purpose of examining the impact of management development on
organisation commitment in Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai,
the following hypothesis was formulated for testing.
Ho: Management development has no positive impact on organisation commitment
Ha: Management development has positive effect on organisation commitment
1.6 Significance of the Study
The findings of this study may be of great significance to both
management and managements of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University,
Lapai. This study may be of immense benefit to other related institutes.
Government organizations such as agencies and departments will benefit from
this study. It will also help management to be more effective in developing
their management.
The challenges identified in the adoption of management development in
Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, can also be corrected.
Examinations and professional bodies may also benefit from this study by
continuously research on the concept of management development and
organization commitment. The findings from this study may be a basis for
future researches.
1.7 Scope of the Study
The scope of this study is to examine impact of management development on
organizational commitment in Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai. 19
Training which is at times used interchangeably with management development is not
within the scope of the study. The study cut across the management staff of Ibrahim
Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai which comprised the academic and non-
academic staff, namely the Vice-Chancellors, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, the Chief
Librarian, the Deans and the Head of Departments, the Registrar, Bursar, Academic
Secretary and Directors represent the administrative arm of the institution in the
management. The survey was conducted in 2014.
1.8 Limitation of the Study
The limitation of this study is the narrow time available for this study and also
there were no comprehensive materials for this study because the previous
researchers do not go deep into the concept of management development and
organization commitment, inadequate internet facilities is also another constraint to
this study.
1.9 Operational Definition of Terms
i. Management Development: Management development refers to a
systematically planned, comprehensive set of professional learning
opportunities carried out over time to achieve specific district-wide, campus,
and department improvement objectives.
ii. Organization Commitment: Organization Commitment is the emotional
commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals.
iii. Training: Training involves the application of formal processes to impact
knowledge and help people to acquire skills to perform their job satisfactorily.
iv. Education: Is a learning activities that long last for a very long period of time,
usually several years, many decades or a life time, with the essence of
acquiring a general knowledge that will benefit the society.
v. Institution: Institution is a large paramount organisation that is established for
the purpose of developing people and contributing to the growth and
development of a state.
20
vi. Organization: Organisation is concerned with unionism of two or more people
who share common belief and purpose.
vii. Affective commitment: Affective commitment relates to how much
employees want to stay at their organisation.
viii. Continuance Commitment: Continuance commitment relates to how much
employees feel the need to stay at their organisation.
ix. Normative Commitment: Normative commitment relates to how much
employees feel they should stay at their organisation.
1.10 Scheme of Chapters
The study has been organised into five chapters. Chapter one introduce the
study and focused on background to the study, statement of the problem, aim and
objectives of the study, research questions, significant of the study, scope of the
study, limitations of the study, operational definition of terms and scheme of
chapters.
Chapter two is on literature review. It explains the concept of management
development, rationale for management development, types of management
development programmes, steps in management development, the concept of
organization commitment, types of organization commitment, factors contributing to
organization commitment, the impact of management development on organization
commitment, and historical development of IBB University.
Chapter three hubs on methodology. It explains the research design, population
of the study, sample size and sampling techniques, instrument for data collection,
measurement of variables and methods of data analysis.
Chapter four focused on data presentation and analysis. The chapter contains
data presentation, analysis and interpretation, and test of hypothesis.
The final Chapter gives the Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations of
the entire study.21
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
The chapter review relevant literature. It focuses on impact of management
development on organization commitment in Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida
University, Lapai.
The concept of management development, rationale for management
development, types of management development programmes, steps in management
development, the concept of organizational commitment, factors contributing to
organizational commitment and also impact of management development on
organizational commitment.
2.2 Concept of Management Development
Management development refers to many types of educational experiences
related to an individual’s work. Doctors, lawyers, educators, accountants, engineers,
and people in a wide variety of professions and businesses participate in management
development to learn and apply new knowledge and skills that will improve their
performance on the job. Many fields require members to participate in ongoing
learning approved by the profession, sometimes as a requirement for keeping their
jobs. Professionals often also voluntarily seek new learning.
Management Development is concerned with ensuring that people ability and
potentials are grown and realized through the provision of learning experiences or
through self directed learning. It is an unfolding process that enables people to
progress from the present state of understanding and capability to a future state in
which higher level skills, knowledge and competencies are required (Raji, 2014).
According to Leonard (2008) Development means those learning experience which
are organised, for a specific time, and designed to bring about the possibility of
behavioural change. Development is a continuous process of enhancing capability of 22
human beings and helping them to change their attitude to give best results in an
organisation, (Rao, 1990).
According to Naga (2008), Management Development is concerned with
focusing on learning experiences provided by organisations to achieve the goals of
the organisation. Naga (2008) clearly identifies three different types of learning
experiences and explains them for conveniences. He labelled them as training,
education and development. Managers are argued not to be trapped by the prior and
often confusing use of these terms. He said the focus of training is on the job the
employee now has. Such learning experiences are corned with actual job
performance. For positions which are highly measurable and clearly identifiable, it is
fairly easy to specify the job and the performance outputs. The focus of education is
on preparing the employee to perform on a specific job or group of jobs in the
organisation in the future. It is still job related but in order to differentiate it from
training, the manager should recognise that the emphasis of education is on the
individual preparing for different job. The most common use of education is to
prepare an individual for a promotion. The time utilization is the future, but a fairly
near future. While the focus of development is on the organisation it is bases on
experiences, which has shown us that organisations must grow and change in order to
stay viable. They must be able to move with the time.
Management Developments is concerned with providing learning experiences
to employees of an organisation and discover and exploit their potentials for common
goals of the organisations to which they belong for the betterment of themselves and
their families and for the country as a whole, (Naga, 2008).
Raji (2014) defined management development as an attempt to improve
managerial effectiveness through learning process. Management development
activities are associated with talent management. Therefore, the ability of manager is
to have the following talent:-
i) To empower and develop people: That is to understand practice and
process of delivering through the capacities of others.
23
ii) To manage people and performance: managers increasingly need to
maintain moral and to maximise performance.
iii) To work across boundaries engaging with others: Working as a
member of a team, thinking differently about problems and their
solutions.
iv) To balance technical and generic skill: That is the technical aspect of
management and the management of human relationship.
v) To develop relationships and focuses on the customers or students:
Build partnership with both internal and external customers and students.
In education, research has shown that teaching quality and school leadership
are the most important factors in raising student achievement. For teachers and school
and district leaders to be as effective as possible, they continually expand their
knowledge and skills to implement the best educational practices. Educators learn to
help students learn at the highest levels.
Many people may not be aware of their local school system’s methods for
improving teaching and student learning. Management development is the only
strategy school systems have to strengthen educators’ performance levels.
Management development is also the only way educators can learn so that they are
able to better their performance and raise student achievement.
2.2.1 Formal Approaches to Management Development
Armstrong (2006) identifies the formal approaches to management development as
coaching, and mentoring, performance management, planned experience, formal
training, and structured self development.
i) Coaching and Mentoring: Development on the job through coaching,
counselling, monitoring and feedback by managers on a continuous basis
associated with the use of performance management processes to identify and
satisfy development needs, and with mentoring;
24
ii) Performance Management: Assessment of personnel performance feeds into
career development, compensation and promotion, movement within the
organization, and sometimes even termination of employment. Importantly it
links the performance of the individual with the objectives of the organization.
Assessment of individual performance through mechanisms such as the
appraisal system are normally linked to training and development plans which
enable people to improve performance and also develop abilities in new areas.
iii) Planned Experience: Development through work experience, which includes
job rotation, job enlargement, taking part in project teams or task groups,
‘action learning’, and secondment outside the organization;
iv) Formal Training: Formal training by means of internal or external courses,
although management training programmes are more likely to be delivered in a
series of modules over a number of months rather than a single, long,
residential course;
v) Structured Self Development: Structured self-development by following self-
managed learning programmes agreed as a personal development plan or
learning contract with the manager or a management development adviser –
these may include guidance reading or the deliberate extension of knowledge
or acquisition of new skills on the job;
The extent to which management development activities are
programmed depends on the organisation and it technology, it environment and the
type of managements it employs. The approach to management development should
be based on understanding on how managements learn and develop and of the use of
formal and informal use of development centres.
2.2.2 Informal Approaches to Management Development
This is an area where management make use of learning experiences that come
across to them during the course of their everyday work. It includes:
i) Getting managements to understand their own learning style so that they
can make use of their experience;25
ii) Emphasizing self assessment and identification of development needs;
iii) Getting management to produce their own personal development plan;
and
iv) Encouraging management to discuss their own problem with their
managers, colleagues or mentors (Armstrong, 2006).
2.2.3 The Integrated Approach to Management Development
The integrated approach to management development takes judicious use of
both informal and formal methods applied in large organisations or institutions. The
five governing principles are set out below:
i) The reality of the management: That is avoid simplicity, assumptions
about what managers need to do or not.
ii) Relevance: Managers need to know things that are relevant to them,
those needs should include not only what managers should know now,
but also what they should know and be able to do in future. That is, what
will be relevant at higher levels in the organizations.
iii) Self development: Managers should be encouraged to develop their self.
That is, self directed development.
iv) Experiential Learning: Provide Managers with variety of experience in
good time, in the course of their career and by helping them to learn
from that experience.
v) Formal Learning: Courses can be introduced to supplement but never
replace experience, and there must be carefully time and selected and
designed to meet particular needs (Armstrong, 2006).
2.3 Rationale for Management Development
Dominic and Colin (2001) identify the essential rationales for employee
development as follows:
i) Development should be continuous in the sense that the professional
should always be actively seeking to enhance performance;
26
ii) Development should be owned and managed by the individual learner;
iii) Development is a personal matter and the effective learner knows best
what he or she needs to learn;
iv) Development should begin from the individual’s current learning state;
v) Learning objectives should be clear and wherever possible should serve
institutional or students needs as well as individual goals;
vi) Regular investment of time in learning should be seen as an essential
part of professional life, not an optional extra;
2.4 Types of Management Development Programmes
Most employee development and training programs fall under the following
categories; Management Development; Career Development; Basic Skills;
Professional Skills; Technical Training; Supervisory Skills, Outdoor Management
Development.
2.4.1 Career Development
Career development is the ongoing acquisition or refinement of skills and
knowledge, including job mastery and professional development, coupled with career
planning activities. Job mastery skills are those that are necessary to successfully
perform one's job. Professional development skills are the skills and knowledge that
go beyond the scope of the employee's job description, although they may indirectly
improve job performance (UCSF, 2014).
Since career development is an ongoing, dynamic process, employees may
need encouragement and support in reviewing and re-assessing their goals and
activities. You are in a key position to provide valuable feedback and learning
activities or resources. Formal training and classes away from the job are effective in
providing new information, but adult learners also need to practice new skills.
Therefore, you can contribute significantly to your management member's career
27
development by supporting career development activities within your department
(UCSF, 2014).
According to UCSF (2014), career development is guided by the following
principles:
i) Current information about the organization and future trends helps
employees create more realistic career development goals;
ii) Focus on skill development contributes to learning opportunities;
iii) Opportunities for promotion and/or lateral moves contribute to the
employee's career satisfaction;
iv) A greater sense of responsibility for managing one's own career contributes
to self-confidence;
v) Career planning and development clarifies the match between
organizational and individual employee goals;
vi) It's cost-effective to use your own management talent to provide career
development opportunities within your department;
vii) Career development increases employee motivation and productivity;
viii) Attention to career development helps you attract top management and
retain valued employees; and
ix) Supporting career development and growth of employees is mandated by
the Philosophy of Human Resources Management.
Moreover, management can contribute to career development in the following ways:
i) Refer to the Employee Development & Training catalog for the career
development course listings;
ii) Annually, conduct an individual development plan and career discussion
with employees and require other supervisors in your department to do the
same;
28
iii) Hold supervisors in your department accountable for supporting employee
development efforts;
iv) Create programs and activities to provide skill development, such as job
rotation, cross-training, mentoring, internships, coaching, and career
strategy groups;
v) Recognize that your role includes providing support and/or release time for
management members' development beyond their current jobs;
vi) Support requests for alternate work schedules from management members;
vii) Serve as a role model by participating in career and professional
development opportunities yourself;
viii) See management members' applications for other positions as a healthy sign
of a dynamic workplace;
ix) Support lateral moves within your organization;
x) Refer employees to the Management Internship Program to explore
opportunities to apply for career development internships or self-initiate an
internship in an area of special interest; and
xi) Create job vacancy listings that allow for the most diverse applicant pool
while honouring transferable skills (UCSF, 2014).
2.4.1.1 Roles Management can play in Career development
The five roles managers play in career development as summarised by UCSF
(2014) as coaching, advisor, appraiser, and referral agents.
i) Coach: Helps employees identify strengths, weaknesses, interests, and values
by maintaining open, effective communication and ongoing encouragement.
You can improve your coaching by:
a) Encouraging two-way dialogue
b) Showing employees how to identify their skills, interests, and values
29
c) Scheduling uninterrupted career development discussions
ii) Advisor: Provides organizational information, realities, and resources to employees. You can improve your advising by:
a) Helping employees develop realistic career goals based on your department's
needs and their individual development plans.
b) Helping employees understand the current opportunities and limitations on
the campus.
c) Advising employees on the feasibility of various career options
iii) Appraiser: Evaluates employees' performance in an open, candid way and
relates this to potential opportunities. You can improve your appraisal skills
by:
a) Providing frequent feedback in a way that fosters development
b) Conducting performance appraisals that define strengths, weaknesses,
and career development needs
c) Relating current performance to future potential in realistic ways
d) Using an individual development plan as a tool for continual feedback
and development
iv) Referral Agent: Helps employees meet their goals through contacts with
people and resources. You can improve your referral agent skills by:
a) Helping employees formulate development plans and consulting on strategies
b) Providing opportunities for experience, exposure, and visibility, such as
committees and task forces)
c) Using personal resources who you know and what you know to create
opportunities
d) Assisting in seeking employees' placement lateral or vertical.
30
2.4.2 Outdoor Management Development Programmes
According to UCSF (2014), Outdoor Management Development Programmes
has become increasingly popular as a method of developing managerial effectiveness.
It relies on the use of a combination of classroom and outdoor activities to create an
environment conducive to changing behaviour. It primarily focuses on personal
development.
2.4.3 Management Development
The management and leadership development process is flexible and
continuous, linking an individual's development to the goals of the job and the
organization. Management development programs on campus give you the
opportunity to develop a broad base of skills and knowledge that can be applied to
many jobs on campus. The overarching goal is a comprehensive curriculum for
managers and supervisors to develop the necessary core competencies to become
excellent leaders. The Employee Relations Unit also provides training for managers
and supervisors, along with performance management tools. Expanding management
core competencies will enable campus managers to keep pace with the demands of a
changing organization (UCSF, 2014).
Guiding Principles of Management Development
UCSF (2014) identifies the guiding principles of management development activities
as:
i) Create a network of colleagues for problem-solving and support;
ii) Promote communication and planning throughout campus and department
networks;
iii)Encourage growth and career development of employees as stated in the
Philosophy of Human Resources Management;
iv) Improve skills and knowledge that can be immediately applied at work; and
v) Increase motivation and job satisfaction.
31
According to UCSF (2014), management development can be supported by the organizations management in the following ways:
i) Model the behaviour you are encouraging; don't neglect your own
development;
ii) Discuss and create a development plan during the performance planning cycle;
iii)Endorse employees attending classes and activities that support development
plans and goals;
iv) Discuss what the employee learned in classes and support integrating new
ideas/methods; and
v) Provide timely behavioural feedback on performance and discuss ways to
improve and develop further.
Provide opportunities for your employees to develop through mentoring, cross-
training, internships, campus management organizations, professional associations,
committee and task force assignments, skill assessment programs, and university
degree and extension programs.
2.5 Steps in Employee Development
According to Dessler (2008), training and development must consist of five
steps:
Step I
Needs analysis: - In this step the trainer identifies the specific job performance skills
needed, assess the prospective trainee’s skills and then develop specific, measurable
knowledge and performance objectives based on any deficiencies identified.
Step II
Instruction design: - Here the trainer decides on, compile and produce the training
programme content including workbooks, exercises, and activities. Some the
techniques might include on-the-job training, off-the-job training and so on.
Step III
Validation :- (optional) this stage validates step 2 in which there is testing of the
training programme on a small representative audience.
32
Step IV
Implementation: - This is where the training programme is actually put into action.
Step V
Evaluation: - Here management assesses success or failure of the programme.
2.6 The Concept of Organizational Commitment
Organizational commitment derives from an article “The organization Man”
written by Whyte in 1956. Commitment comes into being when a person, by making
a side bet, links extraneous interests with a consistent line of activity. Varsha and
Monika (2012) cited Grusky (1966) relates commitment with “The nature of the
relationship of the member to the system as a whole”. Kanter (2001) defines
commitment as “The willingness of social actors to give their energy and loyalty to
social systems, the attachment of personality systems to social relations, who are seen
as self expressive”.
According to Hall et al. (1970) “The process by which the goals of the
organization and those of the individual become increasingly integrated or
congruent” is commitment. Salancik (1977) said commitment is that “a state of being
in which an individual become bound by his action and through these action to
beliefs that sustain the activities of his own involvement”. Mowday et.al (1979)
defined commitment in such a way “The relative strength of an individual’s
identification with and involvement in a particular organization”. Scholl (1981)
described “a stabilizing force that acts to maintain behavioural direction when
expectancy/equity conditions are not met and do not function”. Allen & Mayer
(1990) claim that commitment is “a psychological state that binds the individual to
the organization”. According to the Meyer & Allen (1997) commitment “is a
psychological state that characterizes the employees’ relationship with the
organization and has implication for the decision to continue membership in the
organization.”
33
From the above definition it is clear that commitment is different from
motivation or general attitudes it can lead individuals to behave in a way, from the
prospective of neutral observer, might seem in contrast to their own self-interest.
Employee commitment is important because high levels of commitment lead to
several favourable organizational outcomes. It reflects the extent to which
employee’s identify with and organization and is committed to its goals. Biljana
(2004) stated that the commitment of employees is an important issue because it may
be used to predict employee’s performance, absenteeism and other behaviours.
Rajendran and Raduan (2005) opined that the organizational commitment is the
subset of employee commitment, which comprised to work commitment, career
commitment and organizational commitment and also added greater the
organizational commitment can aid higher productivity.
According to Madigan, Norton and Testa (1999), committed employees would
work diligently, conscientiously, provide value, promote the institution’s services or
organisation’s products and seek continuous improvement. In exchange, they expect
a work environment that fosters growth and empowerment, allows for a better
balance of personal and work life, provides the necessary resources to satisfy the
needs of students and provides for their education and training as well as that of their
co-workers.
Hellriegel (2001) emphasizes that employee commitment goes beyond loyalty
to include an active contribution to accomplishing organizational goals. Employee
commitment represents a broader work attitude than job satisfaction because it
applies to the entire organization rather than just to the job. Further, commitment
typically is more stable than satisfaction because day-to-day events are less likely to
change it.
An impressive amount of research efforts have been conducted to
understanding the concepts and to identify implication of employee commitment over
the performance of the employees on the workplace. Aamir & Sohail (2006)
examined the influence of employee commitment on two—turnover intentions and on
job performance. Rajendran and Raduan (2005) study explores that employee 34
commitment, leads to positive organizational outcomes. Komal & Samina (2011) said
that job satisfaction has the highest impact on high employees’ commitment and
productivity. Meyer, Gellatly, Goffin, and Jackson (1989) examined facts of a
positive correlation between employee commitment and job performance, Low
commitment has also been associated with low levels of morale (DeCottis &
Summers, 1987) non-committed employees may depict the organization in negative
terms to outsiders thereby inhibiting the organization’s ability to recruit high-quality
employees.
Some study examines the relationship of commitment with various factors.
Mathieu & Zajac (1990), shown that commitment has been positively related to
personal characteristics such as age ,length of service in a particular organization
(Luthans, McCaul, & Dodd, 1985), and marital status (John & Taylor, 1999) and
have inverse relation to the employee’s level of education (Glisson & Durick, 1988).
In addition, commitment has been found to be related to such job characteristics as
task autonomy (Dunham, Grube, & Castaneda, 1994), feedback (Hutichison &
Garstka, 1996) and job challenge (Meyer, Irving, & Allen, 1998) and certain work
experiences such as job security (Yousef, 1998), promotion opportunities (Gaertner
& Nollen, 1989), training and mentoring opportunities (Scandura, 1997), and
supportive and considerate leadership (DeCottis & Summers, 1987).
No organisation in today’s world can perform at peak levels unless each
employee is committed to the organisation’s objectives and works as an effective
team member. It is no longer good enough to have employees who come to work
faithfully everyday and do their jobs independently. Employees now have to think
like entrepreneurs while working in teams, and have to prove their worth. However,
they also want to be part of a successful organisation which provides a good income
and the opportunity for development and secure employment.
2.6.1 Commitment and Work Behaviour
The meaning of employee commitment can best be explained by exploring the
social exchange theory. The social exchange theory is grounded in an economic
35
model of human behaviour whereby interactional processes between individuals are
motivated by a desire to maximise rewards and minimise losses. The basic premise of
social exchange theory is that relationships providing more rewards than costs will
yield enduring mutual trust and attraction (Blau, 1964). Furthermore, these social
transactions incorporate both materials benefits and psychological rewards including
status, loyalty and approval. For example, in the workplace, the supervisor provides a
subordinate with support and monetary rewards while in exchange, the subordinate
contributes personal devotions and expertise.
The most widely studied behavioural correlate of commitment has been
turnover in the organisation. However, this focus on turnover may be short-sighted.
Organisational effectiveness depends on more than simply maintaining a stable
workforce; employees must perform assigned duties dependably and be willing to
engage in activities that go beyond role requirements (Organ, 1988). It thus seems
reasonable to assume that employee willingness to contribute to organisational
effectiveness will be influenced by the nature of the commitment they experience.
Employees who want to belong (continuance commitment) or feel obliged to belong
(normative commitment) to make effort on behalf of the organisation. It is interesting
to note that, of the studies that have reported positive correlations between
commitment and performance, most have used measure of affective commitment. It
is possible that an obligation to remain will carry with it an obligation to contribute,
in which case normative commitment would also correlate positively with effort and
performance. Continuance commitment is perhaps least likely to correlate positively
with performance. Employees whose tenure in the organisation is based on need may
see little reason to do more than is required to maintain their membership of the
organisation.
Organisations need employees who are willing to go beyond the call of duty
and engage in extra-role behaviours. For this reason, research continued to examine
the link between the three components of commitment and a multidimensional
measure of work behaviour. Coetzee (2005) cited Allen and Smith (1987) and Meyer
36
and Allen (1984) found that measures of work behaviour correlated positively with
measures of affective and normative commitment but not with continuance
commitment. Research by Randall, Fedor and longenecker (1990) as cited by Coetzee
(2005) revealed that affective commitment contributed significantly to share
knowledge. Normative commitment contributed only to the prediction of concern for
quality, sacrifice orientation and willingness to share knowledge. Normative
commitment contributed only to the prediction of sacrifice orientation, and
continuance commitment did not add significantly to the prediction of any of these
behaviours. These findings thus provide support for the preposition that the three
components of commitment have different implications for work-related behaviour
other than turnover.
A term closely related to commitment is organisational citizenship. According
to Graham (1991) as cited by Coetzee (2005), it can be conceptualized as a global
concept that includes all positive organisationally relevant behaviours of individual
organisation members. It thus includes traditional in-role job performance behaviour,
organically functional extra-role behaviours and political behaviours, such as full and
responsible organisational participation, that have typically been omitted previous
studies of citizenship. In order to understand how employees’ perceptions and
attitudes affect their commitment, and hence their work behaviour, it is necessary to
take a brief look at the precise meaning of organisational citizenship behaviour.
2.6.2 Organisational Citizenship Behaviour
Work behaviour that is in some way beyond the reach of traditional measures
of job performance but holds out the promise of long-term organisational success is
receiving increasing attention as the challenge of global competition highlights the
importance or organisational innovation, flexibility, productive and responsiveness to
changing external conditions. The terms that are generally used to describe such
behaviour include organisational citizenship behaviour (Graham, 1991) and extra-role
behaviour (Van Dyne & Cummings, 1990). According to Becker and Randall (1994)
as cited by Coetzee (2005), organisational citizenship behaviour represents individual 37
behaviour that discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognised by the formal
reward system, and promotes the effective functioning of the organisation. He further
states that it can be conceptualised as a subtle dimension of job performance
composed of extra-role behaviours. Organisational citizenship behaviours are vital
for productivity because organisations cannot forecast through stated job descriptions
the entire spectrum of subordinate behaviours needed for achieving goals. An
organisation’s success is thus dependent on employees’ willingness to do more than
what their official job descriptions outline.
A common theme of these conceptualisations is an attempt to identify work
behaviour that contributes to organisational effectiveness, but which is often not used
to assess job performance. This means that job performance is assessed by referring
to in-role behaviour, whereas organisational citizenship behaviour refers to both in-
role and extra-role behaviour. A critical difference between these two kinds of
behaviour is the extent to which others reward the behaviour and impose sanctions it
it is absent. Both in-role and extra-role behaviours may be intrinsically rewarding.
However, the formal is more likely to be linked to extrinsic rewards and sanctions
(Morrison, 1994).
It is well recognised that organisations reap significant benefits from having
employees who are willing to go above and beyond the required role behaviour.
There may be situations, however, in which it is desirable to have employees
conceptualise their jobs broadly so that they engage in certain organisationally
functional behaviours without feeling that they are doing something extra. For
example, when employees’ helping others is critical to getting a job done effectively,
it might be problematic if supervisors have to depend on employees’ willingness to
engage in extra-role behaviour. In such situations, managers might want to encourage
employees to see helping others as in-role in order to ensure more consistent
performance. It might be valuable therefore for managers to understand the subtle
social and psychological factors that influence employees’ perceptions of their job
responsibilities.
38
Morrison (1994) opined that, an important management function may be to
reduce the perception “that’s not my job” with respect to activities that are critical but
not formally enforced. However, this is no easy task since employees and their
managers have different ideas on defining various as in-role or extra-role, and
consequently how broadly they define their jobs responsibilities. Morrison (1994),
states that one determinant of how broadly employees define their job is affective
commitment. High affective commitment means that an employee perceives his or
her employment as being based on a rational exchange. He or she will thus tend to
define his or her obligations in a broad and flexible manner, indicating high perceived
job breadth. This viewpoint is quite different from what is traditionally regarded as
organisational citizenship behaviour and commitment relationship. Instead of
believing that commitment leads employees to exceed their job requirements,
Morrison (1994) proposes that commitment changes the way in which employees
define job requirements. Extra-role behaviour is more likely to be seen as in-role
behaviour and part of one’s job.
According to Inkeles (1969), as cited by Coetzee (2005), the organisational
citizenship behaviour construct consist of three categories, namely;
(i) Obedience,
(ii) Loyalty, and
(iii) Participation.
Obedience: involves respect for orderly structures and processes. It reflects
employees’ acceptance of the necessity for and desirability of rational rules
and regulations governing organisational structure, job descriptions and
personnel policies.
Loyalty: includes serving the interests of the community as a whole and the
values it embodies. In an organisation, loyalty is identification with and
allegiance to an organisation’s leaders and the organisation as a whole,
transcending the interests of individuals, work groups reputation, and
cooperating with others to serve the interests of the whole.
39
Participation: entails active and responsible involvement in community self-
governance and keeping oneself well informed about issues affecting the
community as well as exchanging information and ideas with other people. In
an organisational context, it refers to interest in organisational affairs and
taking responsibility for organisational governance. It also includes attending
non-obligatory meetings, sharing informed opinions and new ideas with others
and being willing to combat groupthink.
When an employee engages in obedience, loyalty and participation activities as
outlined above, he or she displays commitment to the organisation. Not only does
such person do more than what is expected of him or her, but does not expect to be
rewarded for it.
The relationship between commitment and organisational citizenship
behaviour can best be explained by stating that organisational citizenship behaviours
are displayed by employees to demonstrate their level of commitment to the
organisation. Commitment should thus be seen as a certain state of mind which leads
to the display of certain behaviours. A number of researchers have investigated the
concept of employee commitment, the definition being that it is an individual’s belief
in and acceptance of the goals and values of an organisation, a willingness to work
hard on its behalf, and strong desire to remain in it (Leong, Furnham & Cooper,
1996; Levy & Williams, 1998; Mayer & Schoorman, 1998). According to Moorman
(1991), organisational citizenship behaviour is defined as work-related behaviours
that are discretionary, not related to the formal organisational reward system, and
promote the effective functioning of the organisation (Organ, 1998). The above
definitions of commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour both refer to
internal forces driving work-related behaviour that contributes to the success of the
organisational citizenship behaviour will be regarded as one and the same thing.
Because organisational citizenship behaviours include such a wide variety of
behaviours, Podsakoff and Mackenzie (1989) grouped them into the following five
categories:
40
(i) Altruism: The extent to which an employee is prepared to help co-workers
with their workload and work-related problems.
(ii) Courtesy: The extent to which an employee helps to prevent others’ problems
by advance consultation, information and respect for others’ need.
(iii) Sportsmanship: A willingness to accept minor frustrations and
inconveniences without fuss or complaint.
(iv) Conscientiousness: The extent to which an employee obeys organisational
rules, regulations and procedures.
(v) Civic virtue: Responsible and constructive involvement and participation in
issues confronting the group and organisation.
The extent to which these behaviours are displayed will thus indicate the
degree of an employee’s commitment.
2.6.3 Managing Employees Organizational Commitment
Biljana (2004), Employees' commitment is a valuable and intangible asset
which can produce very tangible results. It is therefore important for management to
build and manage employees' commitment, especially after radical organizational
changes. Since there are different types of commitment it is important to build the
right one.
Empirical evidence shows that affective commitment is strongly related to the
results that organizations value the most. So, the management should implement
policies which will increase this type of commitment. These policies could be divided
into two groups: short-term and long-term policies:
Short-term policies leading to increased affective commitment are:
i) Treating the employee with respect and consideration; employees must feel
that they are valued and appreciated,
41
ii) Organizations are to be customer-oriented; employees tend to identify with an
organization that respects them as well as its customers,
iii)Management must clearly define the job and responsibilities of employees;
supervisors must precisely communicate to their employees what has to be
done and what their expectations are,
iv) Designing stimulating jobs; a tasks that allows employees to use their skills,
professional knowledge and judgment, offers job enrichment and employee
autonomy. This significantly contributes to increasing organizational
commitment, and,
v) Providing high quality information to employees about company's plans and
activities; this is extremely important during periods when the company is
experiencing a crisis since, at that time, employees feel insecure and uncertain
about the future.
Long-term polices leading to increased affective commitment are human resources
management practice which are valid for a long period of time. These practices are:
i) Recruitment and selection: Recruitment strategies may be designed to
influence the desirable type of commitment. Organizations may provide
practical job previews that describe both positive and negative aspects of the
job. When organizations provide such information, applicants are better able to
determine whether the job will meet their specific needs.
ii) Socialization and training: Providing a supportive environment tends to be a
very effective strategy for strong sense of employees' commitment. Training,
otherwise, might lead to different forms of commitment. Employees who
receive training might perceive that the organization values them as individuals
and therefore develop a stronger affective commitment. The same training
could lead to the development of continuance commitment if it provides
specific skills which are valuable only to that organization.
42
iii)Assessment and promotion: The perception of fairness in the assessment and
promotion process is also very important. Affective commitment is likely to
decrease when an employee perceives assessment and procedures as unfair.
iv) Compensation and benefits: Compensation and benefit packages may be
viewed in two different ways. If the employees view a compensation and
benefits package from a purely financial view point, then continuance
commitment may increase. If however, the employees perceive the
organization as one that is fair in rewarding its employees, then affective
commitment is likely to increase.
2.7 Types of Organization Commitment
Meyer and Allen (1991) developed their Three Component Model of
Commitment. The model explains that commitment to an organization is a
psychological state, and that it has three distinct components that affect how
employees feel about the organization that they work for.
The three components are:
i. Affective commitment (affection for your job).
ii. Continuance commitment (fear of loss).
iii. Normative commitment (sense of obligation to stay).
You can use this model to increase commitment and engagement in your team, while
also helping people to experience a greater feeling of well-being and job satisfaction.
i) Affective commitment
Affective commitment is the most common representation of organizational
commitment. It represents employee's emotional attachment to organization and its
goals. It results from an agreement between individual and organizational values and
goals. Individuals who are affectively committed to their organizations believe in the
organizations' goals and wish to maintain their organizational membership.
43
Individuals develop a sense of affective commitment toward their organizations when
they feel competent performing their jobs and are satisfied with their roles as
organizational members.
There are many factors that may influence the level of affective commitment.
They can be divided into two groups: a) individual-level factors, and b)
organizational factors. Individual-level factors include, for example, factors such as:
personality, values orientation, education, age, etc. Organizational factors include:
believing that employee's roles and job goals are clearly defined, management
support, regarding employee's job performances, etc.
ii) Continuance commitment
Continuance commitment represents cognitive attachment between employees
and their organizations because the costs of leaving organizations outweigh the
benefits. Costs may include losing a good pay and other forms of material benefits,
established networks or contacts, image, necessity to reallocate, job search expenses,
etc. Sometimes employees express continuance commitment because of personal
investments in non-transferable investments. These investments include some special
skills that are unique to a particular organization, close working relationships with co-
workers, and other benefits that make it too costly for one to leave organization and
seek employment elsewhere.
There are many factors that may lead to continuance commitment. One of them
is the level of investment they have accumulated in organization. Some of employees
make financial investments upon joining an organization. On the other side, some of
them make nonfinancial investments to gain the role status within their organizations
(they "sacrificed" to create it). The second factor leading to a sense of continuance
commitment may be the employees' perceived lack of alternatives outside of the
organization. If employees believe that fewer work opportunities exist outside of their
organizations, the perceived costs of leaving current organizations will be higher, and
they will develop a stronger sense of continuance commitment to their organizations.
44
iii) Normative commitment
Normative commitment represents feeling of obligation to remain with an
organization. Employees think that they ought to remain with an organization
because they think it is morally right to do so (employees have received scholarships,
training investments, etc.). Factors that may influence the level of normative
commitment are education, age, etc.
2.8 Factors Contributing to organizational Commitment
Employees who are committed to the company show up on time and work hard
every day, while those who are not as committed might start to perform poorly or
have a lackadaisical attitude. There are a number of factors that influence an
employee's commitment to the company, for better or for worse. The following are
some of the factors considered that contribute to organizational commitment.
i. Remuneration
The number one factor that influences managements’ commitment is
compensation and benefit, because that is their primary aim of getting themselves
employed. Employees who are paid handsomely are likely more committed to the
company because they do not want to lose their high-paying jobs. An employee's
salary affects his commitment to the company. Employees who are paid minimum
wage or a small salary likely want to earn more money, either through a promotion or
pay increase, or by looking for work elsewhere. They are likely less committed to the
organisation or institution, because the organisation or institution has not invested as
much money in them through their salary as it has in other employees.
ii. Advancement Opportunities
Employees will also be more committed to a company if there are
opportunities to advance through promotions and more responsibilities. An employee
who wants to become a manager will work harder to show leadership skills and
impress the people in charge of promotions to get the managerial job. On the other
45
hand, if there is no room for advancement for the employee, he might start to look for
work elsewhere when he becomes bored or unsatisfied with his current role.
iii. Organisation or Institution Triumph
The organisation's performance or triumph also affects an employee's
commitment to the organisation. If an organisation is not profitable or is performing
below expectations established by the board or executives, it can affect employee
morale. Employees begin to look for work elsewhere if they feel the company is not
succeeding and might not survive in a competitive market. However, organisations
that are successful also affect employee morale. Employees take pride in the
organisation and put in more effort towards the achievement of organisations or
institutions goals.
iv. Personal Factors
Various personal factors also affect employee commitment to a company. For
example, employees who are married and have kids are more likely to be committed
to a company, because their spouses and children rely on the employees' salaries.
Single employees might not be as committed to the company because they are not
committed to any relationship in their personal lives.
x. Socialization
Providing a supportive environment tends to be a very effective strategy for
strong sense of employees' commitment.
xi. Training and Opportunities for Development
Training and development might lead to different forms of commitment.
Employees who receive training and have opportunities for development might
perceive that the organization values them as individuals and therefore develop a
stronger affective commitment. The same training and development could lead to the
development of continuance commitment if it provides specific skills which are
valuable only to that organization.
46
xii. Assessment and Promotion
The perception of fairness in the assessment and promotion process is also very
important. Affective commitment is likely to decrease when an employee perceives
assessment and procedures as unfair.
xiii. An Effective Recognition and Reward System
Recognition should be available, frequent, and management should recognize
actions that are truly worthy of recognition. Effective recognition system promotes
employee commitment. Effective recognition always involves verbal or written
acknowledgement from the employee's manager in addition to any physical reward
supplied. For an example, First Bank of Nigeria Plc, on monthly basis displays the
pictures of most dedicated teller of the month for that particular month. Another
example of this is Niger State Board of Internal Revenue whose pay commissions to
her staff on monthly basis for reaching and exceeding the set target by the Board.
ix. Performance Appraisal and Frequent feedback
The Management of organisations or institutions needs to conduct performance
appraisal on a daily, weekly and monthly basis and frequently communicate the
feedback to their employees, this will go a long way in increasing the level of
employees’ commitment to work. Effective feedback focuses on what the employee
is doing well and what needs improvement.
x. Shared Values and Guiding Principles
Committed employees thrive in an environment that reinforces their most
deeply held values and beliefs. Employees are most successful in an organization or
institutions in which their personal values are in harmony with the organization's
stated values and guiding principles.
xi. Relationship with Immediate Supervisor and Manager
Demonstrated respect, trust, and emotional intelligence on the part of the
employee's direct supervisor. Managers who relate effectively with employees, who
47
demonstrate that they are personally interested in and care about their employees, and
who elicit employees input and opinions, are golden.
xii. Positive Relationships with Co-workers
Committed employees need to work, not just with nice people, but with co-
workers who are equivalently committed. Co-workers who demonstrate integrity,
team work, a passion for quality and serving customers or students, and who are
passionate about what they do at work, make ideal co-workers in a workplace that
fosters employee commitment.
xiii. The work itself
Employees tend to be more committed if the job or task is interesting,
challenging and exciting, if the working hour is favourable and constant. For an
example, the management staff of IBB University task is considered to be interesting
and exciting and the working hour is favourable (8:00am to 4pm daily, Monday to
Friday).
xiv. Work Environment
Employees’ are found to be more committed in terms of feeling safe in their
working environment, job security, organisation’s commitment to ‘green’ work place
(environmentally sensitive and resource efficient), overall corporate culture
(organisation’s reputation, work ethics, values, working conditions, etc.),
organisation’s commitment to corporate social responsibility (balancing financial
performance with contributions to the quality of life of its employees), variety of
work (working on different projects, using different skills) etc.
xv. Effective Communication
Communication is very vital in every aspect of an institution, management
always feel honoured and pleased if vital and useful information is been passed
across appropriately at the right time and this go a long way by increasing their level
of commitment to work and to the institution as a whole.
48
Employers also need to understand that the level of employee involvement and
commitment will not be uniform for all times. There would be phases when a number
of employees will feel low and it will impact their productivity, but that is natural.
They will also commit silly mistakes, but the leadership has to be considerate towards
them if they are honest in acknowledgement and are willing to mend. Even machines
do not perform with 100 percent efficiency all the time. This kind of vulnerability has
to be accounted for in an organization. Employees need a caring leadership and work
atmosphere to perform their best. High achievers are always groomed through a
congenial work atmosphere and motivational leadership. The only way to generate
the sincere commitment in employees is through an ideal leadership process, which is
dependable, reliable, predictable, empathetic, courageous and full of character and
integrity (Vohra, 2003)
A committed employee is far better than the one who promises but never
delivers because there is a huge difference between promise and commitment. A
promise is a statement of intent whereas a commitment is a promise to be kept, no
matter what. Committed employees always help to build a healthy corporate image.
Commitment is a two way process and one must go the extra mile to create and
maintain it. Do not forget the fundamental fact that commitment, trust and
empowerment go hand-in-hand. It is probably the only way to achieve true corporate
excellence (Vohra, 2003).
2.9 The Impact of Employee Development on Employee Commitment
Mullins (2007) gives the purpose of training and development – to improve
knowledge and skills and to change trainees’ attitude. Thus training becomes one of
the most important potential motivator and hence the following benefits do accrue
from training and development programmes:
i) Employee development increased the confidence and commitment of
management.
49
ii) It provides the needed recognition and enhances responsibility which could
lead to an increase in pay and promotion.
iii) It increases the confidence of managements, which comes from feeling of
personal satisfaction and achievement. This could further broaden career
progression opportunities.
iv) Management development improves the availability, quality and skills of
management.
According to Cole (2004), benefits to institutions from systematic training and
development include:
i) Improved service to students e. g. IBB University
ii) Greater commitment of management (first point of Mullins)
iii) The provision of a pool of skilled personnel for the institution; (same as
Mullins fourth point)
iv) Improvement in job performance with its resulting increase in productivity
overall.
From all of the above, it becomes quite clear that training and development is a
very key element in the improvement process of organization’s performance and
increased level of individual performance and finally leading to institutional
competence. Training therefore bridges the gap between what should happen and
what is happening; i.e. the desired goals or standards and the actual level of
performance. An organization which therefore facilitates learning, growth and
development of individual employees must have training as an integral part of the
organization’s business strategy.
Other benefits that would accrue from management development are:
i) It reduces the need to supervise employees or subordinates thus freeing
supervisors to give attention to other resources of the their departments50
ii) It enhances job satisfaction
iii) It reduces employee turnover, scrap and wastage.
iv) It promotes self insight and environmental awareness; that is an understanding
of how ones action affects others and how one is viewed by others.
v) It improves the ability of employees to make decisions and to solve job related
problems in a positive way.
vi) Development of employees can make work more effective and efficient.
Though the benefits discussed above are no exhaustive, they gave an indication
to the University about the need to take training and development very seriously.
2.10 Historical Background of IBB University
Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai (IBBUL), is a public
university owned by Niger State Government with the mandate to produce high
quality and globally competitive human capital at international recognized and
competitive levels of University Education that will lead the process of socio-
economic and political engineering of Niger State and Nigeria at large. Emerging
from the justification provided by the Blueprint Implementation Committee (EAI) for
a Niger State University as being the Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University
(IBBU) which started with a Preliminary Programme at the temporary Kobo Campus
at Lapai in 2005. As is now well documented in the emerging annals of the
Institution, IBB University became licensed and recognised by the National
Universities Commission (NUC) as the 74th public and 25th State-owned University in
Nigeria in 2006. Thus, the birth of a University named after one of the most
illustrious sons of Africa, Gen. Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, GCFR.
As in the case with every new public university in this part of the globe, IBBU
started academic programmes in 2006 with just a crop of four professorial cadre staff
and motley of 28 Lecturer cadre academic staff for the initial 26 programmes put in
place. Today, IBBU has engaged 20 Professors, 20 Readers (Associate Professors), 51
42 Senior Lecturers and 140 lecturer cadre academic staff. Of course, there are
adequate numbers of technical and support staff (totalling 680) facilitating expected
quality of teaching and learning.
Surely and surely, IBB University is work in progress. The University was
founded by an Engineer and the consolidation of that founding was by an educationist
cum Public Affairs Strategist.
Six key things make a university a true citadel of learning: Appreciable
Funding; Solid Infrastructure; Quality State of the Art Teaching and Learning
Facilities; Right Caliber Academic Staff Commitment to Teaching and a Serene
Environment Conducive for the Pursuit of the Mandate of a University System. For
most Universities, these key elements are achieved during the Foundation Years often
between one to two decades, depending very much on the commitment of proprietors
and stakeholders of the University. And by proprietors and stakeholders of IBBU is
implied the State and Local Governments, Parents, host communities of the
University’s, Well-Endowed Citizens, especially of Niger State extraction wherever
they may be, students and alumni.
Presently, IBB University have six existing faculties they are; Faculty of
Education and Arts which is located at Kobo Campus where the University took-off
temporarily and the other five faculties are; Agriculture, Applied Sciences and
Technology, Management and Social Sciences, Languages and Communications
Studies and Natural Sciences, all the five aforementioned faculties are located at the
permanent site of the Institution’s. The six faculties are presently housing 26
departments, out of which 24 department out of it are fully accredited by NUC, while
the remaining two and others await full accreditation.
The following academic programmes are fully accredited by NUC at
IBBU: B.A Arabic; B. Agric, Animal production; B. Agric, Plant Production;
B.Sc./B.A Ed Adult Education; B.Sc. Biology; B.Sc. Biochemistry; B.Sc. Chemistry;
B.A Ed/B.Sc. Ed Counselling Psychology; B.Sc. Economics; B.Sc. Geography; B.A
52
History; B.Sc. Mathematics; B.Sc. Mass Communication; B.Sc. Political Science;
B.Sc. Sociology and B.Sc. Sports Science and Health Education. Programmes in
B.Sc. in Geology; B.Sc. Food Science and Technology; B.A. French; B.Sc. Business
Administration; B.Sc./Ed. Science Education; B.Sc. Microbiology; B.Sc. Public
Administration; B.Sc. Accountancy: B.A History and International Studies; and B.Sc.
Transport Management are awaiting accreditation or re-accreditation in late 2014 or
early 2015. The University’s also concluded contact with NUC to begin programmes
in Biotechnology, Energy Sciences and Technology, Religious Studies,
Communication Art and Performing Art.
Basic infrastructural facilities have also been provided at the preliminary
schools campuses of the University at Agaie, Ibeto, New Bussa and Tegina where
remedial courses and IJMB programmes are currently been run.
The Tertiary Education Trust Fund has also been instrumental to the
completion of a Twin Lecture Theatre Complex, ICT Building and Central
Laboratory for applied and technology research in the University.
The following units/centres are headed by Directors, there are: ICT Centre,
SIWES, General Studies Unit, Entrepreneurship Development Centre, Academic
Planning Unit, Preliminary Study Centres and Applied Sciences and Technology
Research Centres.
Beyond undergraduate programmes, NUC had given the University’s approval
to run listed programmes on listed programmes on full time basis with effects from
the coming 2014/2015 academic session in November. The approved programmes
are: M. Ed. Psychology, M. Ed. Adult Education and Non Formal, M.A. English,
M.Sc. Biochemistry, PGD and M.Sc. Water Resources and Environmental
Management, M.Sc. Political Science, PGD Crop Production, PGD and M.Sc. Agric
Economics and PGD Marine Studies. IBB University also introduces Diploma
courses which are also expected to kick start in November for 2014/2015 academic
session.
53
Obviously, the university education mandate of IBB University for Nigerians
is abuzz. It is for this reason that presently, 48 staff of the University, including seven
of them absorbed from the Talba Graduate Engagement Scheme are on the
university’ sponsorship for their post graduate programmes in Nigerian and Foreign
universities. Some of the staff so sponsored and who returned recently have since
joined the university full complement of academic staff in critical disciplines like
Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Computer Science and Biology.
To date, IBBU has active linkages with the University of Arkansas (for cross-
cultural research collaborations and exchanges); Malaysian Universities at Johor
Bahru, Putra-Kuala Lumpur, Penang, and Petronas-Ipo, for staff capacity
development. Presently, 18 staff are in these Malaysia Universities undergoing their
post graduate studies for award of Masters and Ph.D degrees while another 3 are in
the United Kingdom. The staff on sponsorship are mostly in specialized areas of
Petroleum Geology, Biotechnology, ICT, Food, Food Science and Technology and
Applied Mathematics.
At present, IBB University, Lapai is registered as full paid member of the
Association of West African Universities (AWAU) and the Association of African
Universities (AAU). IBB University had also completed all requirements for
admission into the International Association of Universities (IAU) and the
Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU).
Since 2007, IBB University has offered admission to eight sets of students for
the undergraduate programme. The institution held her maiden convocation on the
24th of May, 2014 and graduated 1,732 students, the grandaunt are in four sets having
graduated between 2010 and 2014.
54
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter explains the methodology of the study. Specifically, the chapter
explains the research design, population of the study, sample size and sampling
technique, instrument for data collection, measurement of variables and methods of
data analysis. However, a case study method was used.
3.2 Research DesignA case study method was used. This method provides stimulating insights and
also makes for in-depth research analysis. Aina (2002) posited that, it involves an in-
depth study of a unit. It could be a person, family, a group or an institution or even an
entire community. The objective is to gather extensive data about the unit being
studied.
Based on dictates of the stated research objectives, a survey research method
was adopted. A survey deals with the use of mail, questionnaire, personal interview,
and telephone interview to generate research data to effect analysis and decision
making (Nachmias and Nachmias, 2009).
3.3 Population of the StudyThe population of the study comprised all the management staff of Ibrahfim
Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai. Therefore, the population of this study sums
up to 45 management staff. Chinedu (2004) affirms that population or universe is the
entire group of item being studied and about which generalization will be made. The
offices of the IBBUL management are provided in Table 3.1 below.
55
Table 3.1: Offices of the Management Team of IBBUL
Management Office FrequencyVice Chancellor 1
Deputy Vice Chancellor 1
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Administrative) 1
Registrar 1
Bursar 1
Liberian 1
Academic Secretary 1
Deans 7
Directors 5
Head of Directors 26
Total 45Source: Registry office, IBBUL (2014).
3.4 Sample Size and Sampling Techniques
A sample is a finite part of statistical population whose properties are studied
to gain information about the whole (Webster, 2006). The sample size for the study is
40 which represent 89% of the total population of the management staff. This was
determined through the application of Guilford and Flrutcher (1973) sample size
formula as shown below:
n = N
1+ (α)2 X N
Where:
n= Sample size
N= Population
α= alpha
56
α= 0.05
Therefore, the formula is re-expressed as follow:
n= 45
1 + (0.05)2 X 45
= 45
1 + (0.0025 X 45)
= 45
1 + 0.1125
= 45
1.1125
= 40.44
n= 40
40 X 100
45 1
=89%
57
Subsequently, the management team were arranged in strata to facilitate effective
sampling. Thereafter, proportionate stratified random sampling was employed in
selecting the management staff for the survey. Specifically, a proportion of 89% is
selected from each stratum, while random number method was used to carry out
simple random type of probability sampling (see table 3.2).
Table 3.2: Population and Sample Size of the Management Staff of IBBUL
Management Office Frequency Sample size
of 89%Deans 7 6
Directors 5 4
Head of Departments 26 24
Others (Vice Chancellor, Deputy Vice
Chancellor (Administrative), Deputy Vice
Chancellor, Registrar, Bursar, Liberian,
Academic Secretary)
7 6
Total 45 40Source: Registry office, IBBUL (2014).
3.5 Instrument for Data Collection
The instrument used for data collection is questionnaire. The questionnaire was
designed into section A and B. Section A comprises of bio-data of the respondents,
while section B contains the specific research questions on impact of management
development on organizational commitment. The copies of questionnaire were self
administered by the researcher; and the researcher collected the filled copies of
questionnaire. In situations where respondents could not provide the filled copies of
questionnaire on the spot, the researcher had to go back to collect them.
Questionnaire was used because it gives a more direct answers and it enabled easy
tabulation of data and computation of appropriate descriptive statistics. It also
enhances easy quantification of data for onward statistical analysis.58
3.6 Measurement of Variables
a. Effective Management Development: A 9 – items scale was developed to
measure effective management development from the management’s team
perspective (see appendix I). The indicators or items were measured using a
nominal scale, a 5 – point likert type rating scale weight. The likert scale
ranges from 1 to 5, where “1” stands for Strongly Agree, “2” for Agree, “3” for
Undecided “4” for Disagree and “5” for Strongly Disagree.
b. Effective Organization Commitment: To measure organization commitment
to work, 18– items scale was developed (see appendix I). The indicators or
items were measured using a nominal scale, a 5 – point likert type rating scale
weight. The likert scale ranges from 1 to 5, where “1” stands for Strongly
Agree, “2” for Agree, “3” for Undecided “4” for Disagree and “5” for Strongly
Disagree.
3.7 Methods of Data Analysis
Data collected from the respondents by means of questionnaire was
summarized and analyzed with the aid of descriptive statistics (frequency
distribution, mean and standard deviation). Regression Analysis was used to
determine or test the research hypothesis.
3.8 Model Specification
Specification of model is based on regression analysis, which expressed the
relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The regression
formula is y=a+bx+e.
Where
y= dependent variable
59
a= constant
b= coefficient of parameter (x)
x= Independent variable
e= error term
Therefore, the regression formula can be re-expressed as:
OC= a + bMD + e
Where
OC = Organizational Commitment
a= Constant
b= Coefficient of Management Development (x)
MD= Management Development
e= error term
60
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Introduction
This chapter is on the data presentation and analysis. The data collected are
presented, analysed, interpreted and discussed accordingly.
4.2 Questionnaire Distribution and Retrieval
Fourty copies of questionnaires were distributed to management team of IBBU
Lapai, but a total of 33 copies of questionnaire were retrieved; this represents 83% of
the response rate. However, a total of 7 questionnaire equivalent to17% was not
returned. The analysis shows that 83%, 50%, 92% and 67% response rate were
recorded for deans, directors, head of departments and others respectively (see Table
4.1).
Table 4.1: Distribution and Retrieval of Copies of Questionnaire Administered
Management Office Copies of questionnaire distributed
Copies of questionnaire
retrieved
Percentage of questionnaire
retrievedDeans 6 5 83Directors 4 2 50Head of Departments 24 22 92Others (Vice Chancellor, Deputy Vice Chancellor (Administrative), Deputy Vice Chancellor, Registrar, Bursar, Liberian, Academic Secretary)
6 4 67
Total 40 33 83Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.3 Demographic and Socio-economic Variables of the Respondents
It was considered pertinent to investigate the demographic profile of the
respondents. The Respondents’ characteristics that were examined are gender, marital
status, age and educational qualification.61
4.3.1 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Gender
The study sought for information on the gender of the respondents and it
revealed that 31 respondents representing 93.9% are male and 2 respondents
representing 6.1% are female (see Table 4.2). This shows that majority of the
management teams of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University are male.
Table 4.2: Gender of Respondents
Gender Number of Respondents PercentageMale 31 93.9Female 2 6.1Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.3.2 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Age
Table 4.3 shows that the respondent within the age bracket of below 30 years
is1 or 3%, 3 respondents corresponding to 9.1% fall within the age group of 31-40
years, also 16 or 48.5% of the respondents are within the age bracket of 41-50 years,
while those within the age group of 51 years and above are 13 respondents which is
equivalent to 39.4%. This implies that majority of the respondents are between 41-50
years old.
Table 4.3: Age Distribution of the Respondents
Age Number of Respondents PercentageBelow 30 years 1 3.031-40 years 3 9.141-50 years 16 48.551 years and above 13 39.4Total 33 100.0Source: Field Survey (2014)
62
4.3.3 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Marital Status
Table 4.4 shows the distribution of the respondents according to their marital
status. The table reveals that a total number of 2 respondents equivalent to 6.1% are
single. However, 31 or 93.9% of the respondents are married, and non of the
respondents are widow/widower. This shows that a large number of the management
teams of IBBUL are married (see Table 4.4 below).
Table 4.4: Marital Status of the Respondents
Marital Status Number of Respondents PercentageSingle 2 6.1Married 31 93.9Widow/Widower 0 0.0Total 33 100.0Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.3.4 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Education
Table 4.5 reveals that the respondents with First Degree are 2, which is
equivalent to 6.1%, those with Masters Degree are 5 or 15.2%, while those with
Doctorate Degree are 26 or 78.8%. Thus, majority of management teams of IBBUL
possessed Doctorate Degree (see Table 4.5).
Table 4.5: Education Distribution of the RespondentsEducational Qualification Number of Respondents PercentageFirst Degree 2 6.1Masters Degree 5 15.2Doctorate Degree 26 78.8Total 33 100.0Source: Field Survey (2014)
63
4.3.5 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Length of Service in
IBBUL
The analysis of the length of service of the respondents reveals that 2 or 6.1%
of the respondents have worked for the University for less than 1 year, 14
respondents which is equivalent to 42.4% have worked with the University for a
period of 1-5 years, while 17 respondents which represent 51.5% have been with the
University for more than 6 years. This shows that majority of IBBUL management
teams have worked with the University for a period of 5 years and above (see Table
4.6).
Table 4.6: Duration of Work of the Respondents
Duration of Work Number of Respondents PercentageLess than 1 year 2 6.1Between 1 to 5 years 14 42.45 years and above 17 51.5Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.3.6 Distribution of the Respondents on the Basis of Managerial Position
The study revealed that 4 respondents which is equivalent to 12% occupy
managerial positions such as Deputy Vice Chancellor, Bursar, Registrar and Liberian,
2 or 6.1% of the respondents are Directors, also 5 respondents which represent 15.2%
are Deans, while 22 or 66.7 respondents are Head of Departments (see Table 4.7).
Table 4.7: Current Managerial Position occupy by the RespondentsCurrent Positions Number of
RespondentsPercentage
Others (Deputy Vice Chancellor, Bursar, Registrar and Liberian)
4 12
Directors 2 6.1Deans 5 15.2Head of Departments 22 66.7Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
64
4.4 Whether the Respondents Acquired their Highest Academic Qualification
while Working in IBBUL
Data analysis presented in Table 4.8 shows that 4 respondents equivalent to
12.1% acquired their highest academic qualification while working in IBBUL and 29
respondents equivalent to 87.9% acquired their highest academic qualification before
IBBUL engaged their services (see Table 4.8).
Table 4.8: Whether Member of the IBBUL Management Team Acquired their
Highest Academic Qualification while Working in IBBUL
Options Number of Respondents PercentageYes 4 12.1No 29 87.9Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.5 Whether the Respondents had sponsored themselves for Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL
Table 4.9 revealed that 25 respondents which represent 75.8% have sponsored
themselves for staff development programmes while working for/in IBBUL, while 8
or 24.2% respondents have not sponsored themselves for staff development
programmes while working for/in IBBUL. This shows that majority of the
management teams of IBBUL had sponsored themselves for staff development
programmes while working for/in IBBUL.
Table 4.9: Self Sponsor for Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL
Options Number of Respondents PercentageYes 25 75.8No 8 24.2Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
65
4.6 Why Respondents choose to Sponsored themselves for Staff Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL
Table 4.10 revealed that 7 respondents representing 21.2% choose to sponsor
themselves for staff development programmes while working for/in IBBUL because
of non-availability of staff development fund in IBBUL, 25 or 75.8% respondents
sponsored themselves for staff development programmes for personal development, 1
respondent equivalent to 3% sponsored himself/herself for staff development because
of lack of good policy on staff development programmes in IBBUL. The study
revealed that majority of management teams sponsored themselves for staff
development programmes for personal or career development. The implication of this
to the Management of IBB University is that, if a staff keep on sponsoring his/herself
for staff development programmes than his/her employer, it will make staff not to be
fully committed to his/her work and this may lead to loosing staff to other institution
since the organization invest little on the staff.
Table 4.10: Why Respondents Choose to Sponsor themselves for Staff
Development Programmes while working for/in IBBUL
Variables Number of Respondents PercentageNon-availability of staff development fund in IBBUL
7 21.2
For personal development 25 75.8Lack of good policy on staff development programmes in IBBUL
1 3.0
Total 33 100.0Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.7 Whether IBBUL had ever sponsored the Respondents for any staff development programmes
Table 4.11 revealed that IBBUL had sponsored 30 or 90.9% respondents for
staff development programmes, while 3 respondents representing 9.1% had never
66
benefited from staff development programmes sponsored by IBBUL. The findings of
this study revealed that majority of the management teams of IBBUL had benefitted
from the institution’s staff development programmes.
The management of IBBUL should try as much as possible to carry all staff
along in participating in staff development programmes this will go a long way in
increasing the level of staff commitment to work in all departments, units and centres
and this will finally result to the achievement of the institution’s vision.
Fostering an environment where participation in staff development programs
are encouraged and linked to an overall human resource strategy can have a
significant impact on an employee’s level of commitment. In these organizations,
commitment is likely to be higher, as employees are better able to identify with the
organization (Bartlett, 2001). Staff Development can be utilized as a tool that serves
to entrench the staff deeper into a particular social identity. Doing so will make it
more difficult for the staff to change and more committed overall (Scholl, 1981).
Table 4.11: Whether IBBUL had ever sponsored Respondents for any staff
development programmes
Options Number of Respondents PercentageYes 30 90.9No 3 9.1Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.8 Whether Respondents benefit from Staff Development Programmes
Regularly
Table 4.12 revealed that 18 respondents equivalent to 54.5% benefitted from
staff development programmes once per annum, 4 respondents representing 12.1%
benefitted from staff development programmes thrice per annum, also 11 or 33.3%
respondents benefitted from staff development programmes rarely, while none of the
respondent had benefited from staff development programmes twice per annum. This
67
analysis revealed that majority of the management teams of IBBUL benefitted from
staff development programmes once per annum. Staff become more commitment if
they feel that their employer care for them and provided all those things they viewed
as important. Regularly participation of staff in development programmes contributes
to their level of commitment.
A study of several British companies found that when staff development
sought to enhance and develop a “culture of identification” between the organization
and the employee, the intention to search for another job decreased substantially
(Green et al., 2000).
Table 4.12: How often do the Respondents benefitted from Staff Development Programmes?
Variables Number of Respondents PercentOnce per annum 18 54.5Twice per annum 0 0.0Thrice per annum 4 12.1Rarely 11 33.3Total 33 100.0
Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.9 Whether Staff Development Programmes attended by Respondents are
sponsored by TETF or IBBUL
Table 4.13 shows that 20 or 60.6% respondents are sponsored for staff
development programmes by Tertiary Education Trust Fund, 5 respondents
equivalent to 15.2% are sponsored by IBBUL, also 5 respondents representing 15.2%
are sponsored by both TETF and IBBUL, while 3 or 9.1% had never received any
sponsored from both TETF and IBBUL. This analysis shows that majority of
management teams of IBBUL are sponsored for Management Development
Programmes by TETF.
Staff development that attempts to increase identification with the institution is
greatly enhanced when used within a strategic approach to building commitment.
68
Social support for staff development is a major factor in ensuring its successful
integration. Support from upper management, middle managers, and colleagues can
significantly impact the level of investment an employee will make. Cues from these
people and from company policies can send a message to employees regarding the
importance of staff development. The more positive the cues, the more likely staff
development will enhance an employee’s identification with the organization. As a
result, employee commitment is enhanced due to the perceived support that one
receives from management (Scott Brum, 2007).
Table 4.13: Are the Staff Development Programmes attended by Respondents
sponsored by TETF or IBBUL?
Frequency PercentTertiary Education Trust Fund (TETF) 20 60.6
IBBUL 5 15.2TETF and IBBUL 5 15.2None of the above 3 9.1Total 33 100.0Source: Field Survey (2014)
4.10 Effectiveness of Management Development
The study sought to examine the Effectiveness of Management Development
policies and programmes in IBBUL. Analysis revealed that members of IBBUL
management teams considered Management Development policies and programmes
in the University as very effective (Grand Mean = 3.99) (see Table 4.14 below). The
implication of this finding to the management of IBBUL is that for IBBUL to
compete in the new economy and to meet the challenges in work design, management
of IBBUL must ensure that it have necessary competencies necessary to serve the
institution in achieving the aims and objectives of the institutions’ of becoming first
class institution.
69
An investment is a contribution that a staff makes today in anticipation that the
benefit and “pay off” will be achieved in the future. Howard Becker (1960) identified
these investments as “side bets”. In many aspects, staff development is one such “side
bet” that may increase employee investment and commitment.
Gary Becker’s model suggests that because general training and development
provides skill development that can be used at other companies/institutions, the
employer will not invest in it. The underlying premise is that within a competitive
labour market, employees are typically paid for their level of production. With that, a
company/institution that provides general training will have to pay the employee a
wage that coincides with their newly learned skills and their higher level of
production. Institutions that continue paying staff the pre-staff development rate of
pay, risk losing the staff to an institution that will provide the higher wage.
Table 4.14: Effectiveness of Management Development (Descriptive Statistics)
Items Mean Standard Deviation
Ranking
IBBUL have good policy documents on staff development programmes for its management team. 4.15 .619 4
IBBUL has good policies that allow its management to access external funds meant for staff development. 3.39 1.029 9
IBBUL implements policies on staff development accordingly. 4.18 .769 2Management staff of IBBUL are sent for management development programmes regularly. 3.73 .911 8
The management development programmes I have attended helped me to develop my career. 4.00 1.000 6
The management development programmes I have attended improved my leadership roles. 4.24 .663 1
The management development programmes I have attended enhanced my strategic thinking and planning skills. 4.18 .528 3
Regular participation in management development programmes has enhanced my job satisfaction. 3.88 .740 7
Regular participation in management development programmes has enhanced my job performance. 4.03 .847 5
Legend: Maximum = 5; minimum = 1; N = 33Grand Mean = 35.78/9 = 3.99Decision Parameter: Mean score of 1.00 to 1.99 is considered “non-effective management development”, mean score that lie between 2.0 to 3.49 are considered “effective management development”, any mean or average value ranging from 3.50 represent “very effective management development”.Field Survey (2014)
70
4.11 Level of Organization Commitment
4.11.1 Affective Organization Commitment
The study assessed the level and degree of Affective Organization
Commitment of Management staff to Work in IBBUL. Analysis revealed that
management teams of IBB University have strong affective commitment to work
(Grand Mean = 3.88) (see Table 4.15).
Since Affective commitment relates to how much employees want to stay at
their organisation, management of IBB University should ensure that all those things
that are expected of them to do to their staff, are properly put into practice. Because,
the likely implications of them not putting it into practice will have effect on the level
of staff commitment to work and they may view their job as uninteresting and finally,
consider leaving the institution. This will have serious effect on the institution by
losing its competent and potential staff to other institution and it will also increase the
annual budget of the institution because more money will be budgeted for staff
recruitment, advertisement, selection, orientation and socializing, and training and
development of staff. Empirical evidence also shows that affective commitment is
strongly related to the results that organizations value the most. So, the management
of IBB University should implement policies which will increase this type of
commitment. However, if the employees perceive the organization as one that is fair
in rewarding its employees, then affective commitment is likely to increase.
71
Table 4.15: Extent of Affective Organization Commitment by the IBBUL
Management Staff
Items Mean Standard Deviation
Ranking
I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career in IBBUL. 3.27 .876 6Even if it were to my advantage, I do not feel it is right to leave IBBUL now. 3.48 1.149
5
I really feel as if IBBUL’s problems are my own. 4.09 .678 3This institution deserves my loyalty. 4.36 .653 1This department/university has a great deal of personal meaning for me. 4.24 .502
2
I owe a great deal to IBBUL. 3.85 .939 4Legend: Maximum = 5; minimum = 1; N = 33Grand Mean = 23.29/6 = 3.88Decision Parameter: Mean score of 1.00 to 1.99 is considered “weak affective commitment”,
mean score that lie between 2.0 to 3.49 are considered “average affective commitment”, any mean
or average value ranging from 3.50 represent “strong affective commitment”.
Field Survey (2014)
4.11.2 Level of Continuance Organization Commitment
The study assessed the level and degree of Affective Organization
Commitment of Management staff to Work in IBBUL. Analysis revealed that
management teams of IBB University have average continuance commitment to work
(Grand Mean = 3.01) (see Table 4.16).
Continuance commitment relates to how much employees feel the need to stay
at their organisation. Continuance commitment is perhaps least likely to correlate
positively with performance. Employees whose tenure in the organisation is based on
need may see little reason to do more than is required to maintain their membership
of the organisation. Staff development could lead to the development of continuance
commitment if it provides specific skills which are valuable only to that organization.
However, if the employees view a compensation and benefits package from a purely
financial view point, then continuance commitment may increase. Sometimes
employees express continuance commitment because of personal investments in non-
72
transferable investments. These investments include some special skills that are
unique to a particular organization, close working relationships with co-workers, and
other benefits that make it too costly for one to leave organization and seek
employment elsewhere. Some of employees make financial investments upon joining
an organization. On the other side, some of them make nonfinancial investments to
gain the role status within their organizations (they "sacrificed" to create it).
Table 4.16: Extent of Continuance Organization Commitment by the IBBUL
Management Staff
Items Mean Standard Deviation
Ranking
It would be very hard for me to leave my department/university right now even if I wanted to.
3.73 1.153 1
I do not feel any obligation to remain with my current employer. 2.33 1.164 6One of the few negative consequences of leaving this department/university would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
3.09 1.234 3
Right now, staying with my department/university is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
3.36 1.113 2
If I had not already put so much of myself into this department/university, I might consider working elsewhere.
2.88 1.053 4
Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decide to leave my department/university now.
2.64 1.168 5
Legend: Maximum = 5; minimum = 1; N = 33Grand Mean = 18.03/6 = 3.01Decision Parameter: Mean score of 1.00 to 1.99 is considered “weak continuance commitment”,
mean score that lie between 2.0 to 3.49 are considered “average continuance commitment”, any
mean or average value ranging from 3.50 represent “strong continuance commitment”.
Field Survey (2014)
4.11.3 Level of Normative Organization Commitment
The study assessed the level and degree of Normative Organization
Commitment of Management staff to Work in IBBUL. Analysis revealed that
management teams of IBB University have average normative commitment to work
(Grand Mean = 3.01) (see Table 4.17).73
Normative commitment has to do with how much employees feel they should
stay at their organisation. It also represents feeling of obligation to remain with an
organization. Employees think that they ought to remain with an organization
because they think it is morally right to do so. Employee normally feels to remain
with their current employers, if they had received scholarships, training and
development investments, and promotions, etc. Factors that may influence the level
of normative commitment are education, age, etc.
It is possible that an obligation to remain will carry with it an obligation to
contribute, in which case normative commitment would also correlate positively with
effort and performance. Normative commitment contributed only to the prediction of
concern for quality, sacrifice orientation and willingness to share knowledge.
Table 4.17: Extent of Normative Organization Commitment by the IBBUL
Management Staff
Items Mean Standard Deviation
Ranking
I do not feel a strong sense of belonging to my department/university 2.00 .901
4
I feel that I have too few options to consider leaving this department/university 2.39 .899
3
I do not feel ‘emotionally attached’ to this department/institution 1.94 .899 6I do not feel like ‘part of the family’ in my department 1.97 .770 5I would not leave this institution right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it. 3.76 1.001
1
I would feel guilty if I leave this institution now. 3.36 1.388 2Legend: Maximum = 5; minimum = 1; N = 33Grand Mean = 15.42/6 = 2.57Decision Parameter: Mean score of 1.00 to 1.99 is considered “weak normative commitment”,
mean score that lie between 2.0 to 3.49 are considered “average normative commitment”, any mean
or average value ranging from 3.50 represent “strong normative commitment”.
Field Survey (2014)
74
4.11.4 Summary of Organization Commitment (Affective, Normative and
Continuance)
The study evaluated the level and extent of Management staff Organization
Commitment to Work in IBBUL. Analysis revealed that management teams have
average commitment to work (Grand Mean = 3.15) (see Table 4.18). This implies
that, they feel they are part of the family of their departments but they may consider
leaving the institution whenever they wish to.
The most widely studied behavioural correlate of commitment has been
turnover in the organisation. However, this focus on turnover may be short-sighted.
Organisational effectiveness depends on more than simply maintaining a stable
workforce; employees must perform assigned duties dependably and be willing to
engage in activities that go beyond role requirements (Organ, 1988). It thus seems
reasonable to assume that employee willingness to contribute to organisational
effectiveness will be influenced by the nature of the commitment they experience.
Employees who want to belong (continuance commitment) or feel obliged to belong
(normative commitment) to make effort on behalf of the organisation. It is interesting
to note that, of the studies that have reported positive correlations between
commitment and performance, most have used measure of affective commitment. It
is possible that an obligation to remain will carry with it an obligation to contribute,
in which case normative commitment would also correlate positively with effort and
performance. Continuance commitment is perhaps least likely to correlate positively
with performance. Employees whose tenure in the organisation is based on need may
see little reason to do more than is required to maintain their membership of the
organisation.
These findings thus provide support for the preposition that the three
components of commitment have different implications for work-related behaviour
other than turnover.
75
Table 4.18: Extent of Organization Commitment by the IBBUL Management
Staff
Items Mean Standard Deviation
Ranking
I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career in IBBUL. 3.27 .876 10Even if it were to my advantage, I do not feel it is right to leave IBBUL now. 3.48 1.149
7
I really feel as if IBBUL’s problems are my own. 4.09 .678 3This institution deserves my loyalty. 4.36 .653 1This department/university has a great deal of personal meaning for me. 4.24 .502
2
I owe a great deal to IBBUL. 3.85 .939 4It would be very hard for me to leave my department/university right now even if I wanted to.
3.73 1.1536
I do not feel any obligation to remain with my current employer. 2.33 1.164 15One of the few negative consequences of leaving this department/university would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
3.09 1.23411
Right now, staying with my department/university is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
3.36 1.1138
If I had not already put so much of myself into this department/university, I might consider working elsewhere.
2.88 1.05312
Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decide to leave my department/university now.
2.64 1.16813
I do not feel a strong sense of belonging to my department/university 2.00 .901
16
I feel that I have too few options to consider leaving this department/university 2.39 .899
14
I do not feel ‘emotionally attached’ to this department/institution 1.94 .899 18I do not feel like ‘part of the family’ in my department 1.97 .770 17I would not leave this institution right now because I have a sense of obligation to the people in it. 3.76 1.001
5
I would feel guilty if I leave this institution now. 3.36 1.388 9Legend: Maximum = 5; minimum = 1; N = 33Grand Mean = 56.74/18 = 3.15Decision Parameter: Mean score of 1.00 to 1.99 is considered “weak commitment”, mean score
that lie between 2.0 to 3.49 are considered “average commitment”, any mean or average value
ranging from 3.50 represent “strong commitment”.
Field Survey (2014)
4.12 Effect of Management Development on Organisation Commitment
The alternative hypothesis which stated that Management Development has no
positive impact on Organization Commitment was tested using Linear Regression.
76
Result of data analysis as contained in “Appendix III” shows the independent
variable, Management Development and the dependent variable, Organization
Commitment. The coefficient of (R) is .664, while the coefficient of determination
(R2) is .223. This implies that Management Development and Organization
Commitment are correlated by 66.4%, while Management Development is
responsible for only 22.3% variation in Organization Commitment.
Data analysis yielded an F – Cal. of 2.018 and P – Value of .084 (where >
0.05 or 5%). Thus, the null hypothesis is supported while the alternative hypothesis is
rejected. That is, Management Development has no positive impact on organization
commitment to work (see Table 4.19 below).
Table 4.19: Effect of Management Development on Organisation Commitment
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 10.831 9 1.203 2.018 .084a
Residual 13.715 23 .596
Total 24.545 32
a. Predictors: (Constant), Management Developmentb. Dependent Variable: Organization Commitment
The significant value 0.84 is equivalent to 8.4% which is greater than 0.05 or 5%. In this case, null hypothesis is retained.
77
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
The major objective of the study is to examine the impact of management
development on organization commitment to work. However, preliminary analyses
revealed that majority of management staff of IBB University acquired their highest
academic qualification before IBB University engaged their services. In addition, the
study found that majority of the surveyed staff of IBB University had sponsored
themselves for staff development programmes while working for/in IBB University,
and that they choose to sponsor themselves for personal development. Majority of
them also benefitted from staff development programmes once per annum and that
the sponsored received are from both IBB University and TETF.
Importantly, the surveyed staff of IBB University are averagely committed to
work, this implies that, they feel they are part of the family of their departments but
they may consider leaving the institution whenever they wish to and they considered
Management Development as very effective. Statistically, the study established that
Management Development has no positive impact on organization commitment.
5.2 Conclusions
The major objective of the study is to examine the impact of management
development on organization commitment to work. However, it was concluded that
majority of management staff of IBB University acquired their highest academic
qualification before IBB University engaged their services. In addition, the study
found and concluded that majority of the surveyed staff of IBB University had
sponsored themselves for staff development programmes while working for/in IBB
78
University, and that they choose to sponsor themselves for personal development.
The study also concluded that majority of the management staff of IBB University
had benefitted from staff development programmes once per annum and that the
sponsored received are from both IBB University and TETF.
Finally, it was concluded that the surveyed staff of IBB University are
averagely committed to work. This implies that, they feel they are part of the family
of their departments but they may consider leaving the institution whenever they wish
to and they considered Management Development as very effective. The study
concluded that Management Development has no positive impact on organization
commitment.
5.3 Recommendations
Arising from the study’s findings as well as the conclusions, the following
recommendations are made:
i. That management of IBB University should not only rely on the fund provided
by Tertiary Education Trust Fund for the development of its staff, the
institution should also set aside a separate amount of money yearly from the
institution’s account for staff development.
ii. Staff development fund should be made available to staff whenever they
requested for it for development programmes, and it should be release in a
manner that is in line with staff development policy in IBB University.
iii. Management of IBB University should ensure it has a good policy on
promotion of staff and implement it accordingly, because this goes a long way
in increasing the level of the staff commitment to work.
iv. To better compete in the global market, IBB University will need to establish
and implement corporate strategies to promote itself as a “preferred employer”
– investing in progressive Human Resource policies and programs with the 79
goal of building a high-performing institution of engaged staff, and fostering
and creating a work environment where staff want to work, not where they
have to work.
v. Since management teams considered their commitment to work to be average
commitment, which means they are not satisfied with their current job,
management of IBB University should carry out it required burden as expected
on it staff in order not to loss most of it competent staff to other institutions.
vi Finally, the study recommends that for IBB University, Lapai to be triumphant
as the first choice University in Africa, management must empower all
departments to engage in development of staff to build potential and strengthen
staff competencies.
5.4 Suggestions for Further Research
This study is limited to management staff of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida
University, Lapai. Similar study should be carried out covering the whole university
and other institutions such as polytechnics and colleges of education. Future studies
can also be carried out using the entire public Universities in Nigeria to ensure wider,
larger scope and sample size.
80
REFERENCES
Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th Ed). Philadelphia: Konga Page Limited.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd Ed.), Chicago, I L: University of Chicago Press.
Biljana, D. (2004). Employee Commitment in Times of Radical Organisational Changes. Economics and Organisation, 2, 2, 111-117.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Brum, S. (2008). What Impact Does Training have on Employee Commitment and Employee Turnover? Retrieved August 22, 2014. Available at
<www.uri.edu/.../Brum-Commitment. pdf>
Coetzee, M. (2005). Employee Commitment. South-Africa: University of Pretoria
Cole, G. A. (2004). Management Theory and Practice (6th Ed). Thomson Learning
Dessler, G. (2008). Human Resource Management (11th Ed). Pearson International
Edition.
Dominic, I. and Colin, B. (2001). Human Resource Development. London: Kogan Page Limited. P.359
Hall, D.T., Schneider, B.,& Nygren, H.T.(1970) Personal Factors in Organizational Identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176-189.
Hellriegel, D., Slocum, Jr. J. W. and Woodman, R.W. (2001). OrganizationalBehaviour (9th Ed). Sydney: Thomson Learners.
Ivancevich, J. M. (2010). Human Resource Management (8th Ed). Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill
John, P. W. (2001). Human Resource Development. London: Kogan Page Limited
Kanter, R. (2001). Evolve. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Li, S., Cannon and Wongi, A. (2014). The Impact of Career Development on Employee Commitment of Part-Time Faculty (PTF) in Hong Kong’s Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Sector, Brtitish Journal of Education, Society, & Behavioural Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp. 57-73
Madigan, M., Norton, J. and Testa, I. (1999). The Quest for Work . Life Balance.Rogers Media. Retrieved on 1st July, 2014. Available at <http://www.benefitscanada.com/content/legacy/content/1999/html>
Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of 81
organisational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1): 61-89.
Mullins, J. L. (2007). Management and organizational Behavior (8th Ed). Edinburg Gate: Prentice Hall. Pearson Education.
Nachmias, C. F. and Nachmias, D. (2009). Research Methods in the Social Sciences (5th Ed.), UK: Hodder Education Company.
Nadler, L. (2008). Corporate Human Resource Development. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Naga, R. B. (2008). Human Resource Development. A P H Publishing Corporation: Andhra Pradesh – India.
Newstrom, J. W. and Davis, K. (2002). Organizational Behaviour. "Human Behaviour at Work." (11th Ed). New Delhi Tata: Mcgraw - Hill Publishing
Company Limited.
Rajendran, M. and Raduan, C. R. (2005). Typology of Organizational Commitment. American Journal of Applied Science, 2,6,1071078-1081.
Raji, I. A. (2014). Lecture Note on Human Resource Development: Management Development. Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State (Unpublished).
Rao, T. V. (1990). The Human Resource Development Missionary. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, Ltd.
Salancik, G.R. (19977), Commitment and the Control of Organisational Behaviour and Belief, New Direction for Organisational Behaviour, 1-
54,Chicogo:St.Clair.Scott, E. (2008). Job Burnout: Job Factors that Contribute to Employee Burnout.
Retrieved on 18th June 2014. Available at <http://stress.about.com/od/burnout/a/job_burnout.htm >
UCSF (2014). Human Resources: Guide to Managing Human Resources. California: University of California San-Francisco.
Varsha, D. and Monika, B. (2012). A Study about Employee Commitment and its Impact on Sustained Productivity in Indian Auto-Component Industry. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 34 – 51.
Vohra, D. K. (2003). Employee Commitment and Corporate Excellence. IT People. Mumbai: Indian Express Group.
82
Appendix I: Questionnaire
Department of Business Administration
Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State.
I am a final year student of the above named institution. I am conducting a research on
“Impact of Management Development on Organization Commitment: A Case Study of IBB
University, Lapai”.
You are requested to fill the questionnaire attached. The information to be elicited from you
would be used for academic purposes only. Therefore, be assured that it will be treated with utmost
confidentiality.
Thank you for your anticipated co-operation.
Yours faithfully,
Abdulsalam AbdullahiGSM No: 08039293304, 08074832583Email: [email protected]
THE QUESTIONNAIRESection AInstruction: Please, kindly fill/tick ( ) the appropriate answer based on your understanding and make brief comments where spaces are provided.
1. Sex (a) Male [ ] (b) Female [ ]2. Marital status (a) Single [ ] (b) Married [ ] (c) widowed [ ]3. Age (a) below 30 years [ ] (b) 31-40 years [ ] (c) 41-50 years [ ]
(d) 51 years and above [ ]4 Highest Educational Qualification (a) First degree [ ] (b) Masters Degree [ ]
(c) Doctorate degree [ ] (e) Others, Specify……………………….. 5. For how long have you been working with IBBUL? (a) Less than 1 year [ ]
(b) Between 1 to 5 years [ ] (c) 5 years and above [ ] 6. What is your current position in the organization?
…………………………………………………………………………
Section B
7. Did you acquire your highest academic qualification while working in IBBUL? (a) Yes [ ] No [ ] 8. Have you ever sponsored yourself for any staff development programmes such as workshops,
seminars and conferences while working for/in IBB University, Lapai? (a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ] 9. If yes, why did you choose to sponsored yourself?
(a) Non-availability of staff development fund in IBBUL. Yes [ ] No [ ](b) For personal development. Yes [ ] No [ ]
83
(c) Lack of good policy on staff development programmes in IBBUL.Yes [ ] No [ ](d) …………………………………………………………………….
10. Has IBBUL ever sponsor you for any staff development programmes such as workshops, seminars and conferences? Yes [ ] No [ ]
11. If yes, how often do you benefit from such staff development programmes?(a) Once per annum(b) Twice per annum(c) Thrice per annum(d) Others, Specify ……………………………..
12. If yes to question 10, are the staff development programmes attended by you sponsored by: (a) Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETF)? Yes [ ] No [ ]
(b) IBBUL? Yes [ ] No [ ]
Section C
Effective Management Development
Please, read the following statements and indicate the extent of your agreement and disagreement by ticking one of the five (5) options, namely Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.
S/N Statements
Stro
ngly
A
gree
Agr
ee
Und
ecid
ed
Dis
agre
e
Stro
ngly
D
isag
ree
1 IBBUL have good policy documents on staff development programmes for its management team.
2 IBBUL has good policies that allow its management to access external funds meant for staff development.
3 IBBUL implements policies on staff development accordingly.4 Management staffs of IBBUL are sent for management
development programmes regularly.5 The management development programmes I have attended helped
me to develop my career.6 The management development programmes I have attended
improved my leadership roles.7 The management development programmes I have attended
enhanced my strategic thinking and planning skills.8 Regular participation in management development programmes has
enhanced my job satisfaction.9 Regular participation in management development programmes has
enhanced my job performance.
84
Section D
Effective Organization Commitment
Please, read the following statements and indicate the extent of your agreement and disagreement by ticking one of the five (5) options, namely Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree and Strongly Disagree.
Affective Commitment
S/N
Statements
Stro
ngly
A
gree
Agr
ee
Und
ecid
ed
Dis
agre
e
Stro
ngly
D
isag
ree
1 I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career in IBBUL.2 Even if it were to my advantage, I do not feel it is right to leave
IBBUL now.3 I really feel as if IBBUL’s problems are my own.4 This institution deserves my loyalty.5 This department/university has a great deal of personal meaning
for me.6 I owe a great deal to IBBUL.
Continuance Commitment
S/N
StatementsSt
rong
ly
Agr
ee
Agr
ee
Und
ecid
ed D
isag
ree
Stro
ngly
D
isag
ree
7 It would be very hard for me to leave my department/university right now even if I wanted to.
8 I do not feel any obligation to remain with my current employer.9 One of the few negative consequences of leaving this
department/university would be the scarcity of available alternatives.
10 Right now, staying with my department/university is a matter of necessity as much as desire.
11 If I had not already put so much of myself into this department/university, I might consider working elsewhere.
12 Too much of my life would be disrupted if I decide to leave my department/university now.
85
Normative Commitment
S/N
Statements
Stro
ngly
A
gree
Agr
ee
Und
ecid
ed
Dis
agre
e
Stro
ngly
D
isag
ree
13 I do not feel a strong sense of belonging to my department/university
14 I feel that I have too few options to consider leaving this department/university
15 I do not feel ‘emotionally attached’ to this department/institution16 I do not feel like ‘part of the family’ in my department17 I would not leave this institution right now because I have a
sense of obligation to the people in it.18 I would feel guilty if I leave this institution now.
86
Appendix II: Frequency Distribution of Management Development
S/N Items Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
Undecided (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
F % F % F % F % F %i IBBUL have good policy
documents on staff development programmes for its management team.
9 27.3 20 60.6 4 12.1 0 0 0
ii IBBUL has good policies that allow its management to access external funds meant for staff development.
12 36.4 16 48.5 4 12.1 1 0 0
iii IBBUL implements policies on staff development accordingly.
4 12.1 14 42.2 6 18.2 9 27.3 0 0
iv Management staffs of IBBUL are sent for management development programmes regularly.
7 21.2 13 39.4 10 30.3 3 9.1 0 0
v The management development programmes I have attended helped me to develop my career.
10 30.3 17 51.5 4 12.1 0 0 2 6.1
vi The management development programmes I have attended improved my leadership roles.
12 36.4 17 51.5 4 12.1 0 0 0 0
vii The management development programmes I have attended enhanced my strategic thinking and planning skills.
8 24.2 23 69.7 2 6.1 0 0 0 0
viii Regular participation in management development programmes has enhanced my job satisfaction.
5 15.2 21 63.6 5 15.2 2 6.1 0 0
ix Regular participation in management development programmes has enhanced my job performance.
10 30.3 16 48.5 5 15.2 2 6.1 0 0
n=33
Source: Research Data (2014)
87
Appendix III
Regression Analysis
Variables Entered/Removed a
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method1 Management Development a . Enter
a. All requested variables entered
b. Dependent Variable: Organization Commitment
Model Summary b
Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square Std. Error of the Estimate
Change Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .664a .441 .223 .772 .441 2.018 9 23 .084a. Predictors: (Constant), IV Management Development
b. Dependent Variable: DV Organization Commitment
Coefficients c
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
95% Confidence Interval for B
B Std. Error Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 2.433 1.260 1.931 .066 -.173 5.039
Management
Development .409 .292 .288 1.400 .175 -.195 1.012
Source: Research Data (2014)
88