服務品質與顧客滿意度之關係 以台中市 tasty餐廳為例 ·...

61
嶺東科技大學觀光與休閒管理系 專題個案研究期末報告 服務品質與顧客滿意度之關係- 以台中市 TASTY 餐廳為例 指導老師:連佳振 教授 組員名單: 969v055 張宏章 969v069 余智凱 969v073 張凱勛 969v076 楊奇龍 969v119 馮國維 專題編號:<TRM-99-4B21> 中華民國 100 5 滿- TASTY 100

Upload: others

Post on 01-Sep-2019

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • -

    TASTY

    969v055 969v069 969v073 969v076 969v119

    100 5

    -

    TASTY

    100

  • - tasty

    2

    -

  • - tasty

    3

    1986

    TASTY

    TASTY

    TASTY()

    200 200 100%

    T

  • - tasty

    4

    .8

    .10

    .11

    .....12

    .13

    .14

    ......15

    ......23

    .......27

    TASTY ....31

    .......32

    ...33

    ...34

    ...... 41

    ...43

    T ...44

    .......46

  • - tasty

    5

    ... 53

    ... 56

    ....58

    ...60

  • - tasty

    6

    1-5-1 ..............................................................................................................13

    2-1-1 ..................................................................................................19

    2-1-2 ..........................................................................................21

    2-3-1 ......................................................................27

    3-1-1 ..............................................................................................................32

    3-4-1 ......................................................................................................35

  • - tasty

    7

    2-1-1 ..............................................................................................................16

    2-1-2 ..............................................................................................................17

    2-3-1 ..............................................................................26

    3-4-1 ..................................................................................................36

    3-4-2 ..............................................................................................................37

    4-1-1 ..........................................................................................................42

    4-2-1 ..........................................................................................43

    4-3-1 ...............................................................44

    4-3-2 ...............................................................45

    4-4-1 ...................................................................47

    4-4-2 ..................................................................48

    4-4-3 ..............................................................49

    4-4-4 ..........................................................50

    4-4-5 ....................................................................51

    4-4-6 ..................................................................52

  • - tasty

    8

    20058 30 94 6

    247 0.57% 11.43%

    13.00% 4.62% 0.52% 1

    6 5.52%

    1986

    Marr (1986)

    Tasty Tasty

  • - tasty

    9

    Tasty

  • - tasty

    10

    Tasty

    Tasty

  • - tasty

    11

    Tasty

    Tasty

  • - tasty

    12

    (Parasuraman, Zeithamal, and Berry, 1985)

    Crompton and Mackay(1989)

  • - tasty

    13

    1-5-1

  • - tasty

    14

    TASTY

    Tasty

    Tasty

  • - tasty

    15

    Gronroos(1982)

    ParasuramanZeithaml Berry (1985)

    =

    -Farsad and Elshennawy (1989)

    (Klose and Finkle1995)Andrew(2002)

    Bateson and Hoffman(2002)

    (2008)

    (2009)

  • - tasty

    16

    Kolter(2000)

    Kotler(2000)

    2-1-1

    2-1-1

    (Intangibility)

    (Inseparability)

    (Variability)

    (Perishability)

    Gronroos et al. (2000)

    20(2)

  • - tasty

    17

    Parasuraman et al.PZB

    Gap

    2-1-2

    2-1-2

  • - tasty

    18

    Parasuraman

    gapConceptual model of service

    quality2-1-1

  • - tasty

    19

    2-1-1

  • - tasty

    20

    criteriaParasuraman

    10

    Dimensions of service quality

    2-1-2

    10

    1.access

    2.communication

    3.competence

    4.courtesy

    5.(credibility)

    6.reliability

    7.responsiveness

  • - tasty

    21

    8.security

    9.(tangibility)

    10.understanding/knowing

  • - tasty

    22

    Parasuraman, Zeithaml, BerryPZB522

    SERVQUSALPZB 1991

    PZB SERVQUAL

    PZB(1991)

    SERVQUAL

  • - tasty

    23

    (Customer Satisfaction)

    Spreng (1992)

    2-2-1

    AndersonFornell & Lehmann

    (1994)

    2-2-1

    (Boulding, Kalra, Staelin &Zeithaml, 1993)

    (Howard & Sheth, 1969; Oliver,1981)

    (Johnson & Fornell, 1991)

  • - tasty

    24

    (Solomon, 1991; Fornell, 1992)

    (Cognitive)Howard &

    Sheth (1969)

    (Westbrook, 1980; Churchill & Surprenant, 1982;Engel, Blackwell & Minard,

    1993)

    (Miller,1997)

    -

    (disconfirmation)

    (Oliver, 1980)

    Anderson & Sullivan

    (1993)

    (Westbrook,1980)

    (Oliver, 1981)

  • - tasty

    25

    (Cadotte, Woodruff & Jenkins, 1987)

    (Woodruff, 1983)Mano Oliver(1993)

    (Hunt, 1977)

    (Oliver, 1981)Oliver (1993)

    (Spreng Mackoy, 1996)

    (Iacobucci , Hrayson and Amy,

    1994)

  • - tasty

    26

    2-3-1

    Cornin & Taylor

    Zeithaml & Bitner

    Brady et al.

  • - tasty

    27

    Parasuraman et al.

    2-3-1

  • - tasty

    28

    ;(2009)-Kano

    23

    5 2

  • - tasty

    29

    (2009) -Gibson(1999)

    2002

    Anderson Sullivan(1993)

    Zeithaml Bitner(2003)

    2-3-1 Zeithaml Bitner2003

  • - tasty

    30

    Parasuraman et al. (1988)

    SERVQUAL 1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    SERVQUAL

    (Fick and Ritchie 1991)

    (perception; P)

    (expectation; E)(service quality; SQ

    = P-E)

    2002

  • - tasty

    31

    TASTY

    TASTY 2001

    TASTY

    95%

    1.

    2. 1+1+1=9

    3.

    4.

  • - tasty

    32

    3-1-1

  • - tasty

    33

    1-1

    1-2

    1-3

    1-4

    2-1

    2-2

    2-3

    2-4

  • - tasty

    34

    ()

    (,2006200)

    1

  • - tasty

    35

    3-4-1

  • - tasty

    36

    3-4-1

    1 2 3

    4 5 6

    7 8 9

    10 11 12 13

    14 15 16 17

    PZB(1995)Kettinger&Lee(1997)

  • - tasty

    37

    3-4-2

    (Survey Items)

    1 2 3 Tasty 4 5

    PZB(1995)Kettinger&Lee(1997)

    Punck(1998100)

    Cronbachs

  • - tasty

    38

    ()

    1.

    TASTY

    TASTY

    200 200

    ()

    SPSS 10.0

    1.

    2.

  • - tasty

    39

    2

    34

    30

    5

    Cronbachs

    2005 ) ,

    3. T

    t

  • - tasty

    40

    4.

  • - tasty

    41

    89 111 20 6

    21~30 118 31~40 40 41~50 26 51~60 6

    60 4 4

    63 115 18

    134 66 2 14 2~3

    80 3~4 59 4~5 26 5~6 11 6

    10

  • - tasty

    42

    4-1-1

    89 44.22 44.22

    111 55.78 100.00

    20 6 3.02 3.02 21~30 118 59.30 62.31 31~40 40 20.10 82.41 41~50 26 13.07 95.48 51~60 6 2.51 97.99 60 4 2.01 100.00

    () 4 2.01 2.01 () 63 31.66 33.67 () 115 57.29 90.95 18 9.05 100.00

    2 14 7.04 7.04 2~3 80 40.20 47.24 3~4 59 29.65 76.88 4~5 26 13.07 89.95 5~6 11 5.53 95.48

    6 10 4.52 100.00

  • - tasty

    43

    (test-retest reliability)(alternative-form reliability)

    (split-half reliability)(internal consistency

    reliability)

    Cronbachs

    (,2005)4-2-1

    Cronbachs 0.9180.850Nunnally(1978)

    (0.7)0.80

    4-2-1

    Cronbachs

    0.918

    0.850

    Cronbachs 0.7(Nunnally,1978)

  • - tasty

    44

    T

    T (T-test)

    ()

    t

    4-3-1

    F Sig F t (2-tailed) Sig t (1) (N=89)

    (2) (N=111)

    3.4015 3.2913 1.622 .204 1.198 .232 3.5909 3.5045 .544 .462 .939 .349 3.6288 3.5315 3.538 .061 1.067 .287 3.5852 3.4032 3.722 .055 2.333 .021 3.6023 3.5833 .636 .426 .231 .818

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

  • - tasty

    45

    .05 t

    4-3-2

    F Sig F t (2-tailed) Sig t (1) (N=89)

    (2) (N=111)

    3.4432 3.3676 .001 .975 .867 .387 *P.05**P.01***P.001

  • - tasty

    46

    () 4-4-1

    F 2.357 (P =.042).522 (P =.760).315 (P

    =.904)1.464 (P =.203).775 (P =.569)

  • - tasty

    47

    4-4-1

    F F(Sig)

    (1)20 6 2.8333 2.357 .042 (2)21~30 118 3.2684 (3)31~40 40 3.5500 (4)41~50 26 3.4615 (5)51~60 6 3.5333 (6)60 4 3.0833

    (1)20 6 3.2778 .522 .760 (2)21~30 118 3.5424 (3)31~40 40 3.5750 (4)41~50 26 3.6282 (5)51~60 6 3.4000 (6)60 4 3.2500

    (1)20 6 3.3333 .315 .904 (2)21~30 118 3.5621 (3)31~40 40 3.6250 (4)41~50 26 3.6154 (5)51~60 6 3.6667 (6)60 4 3.4167

    (1)20 6 3.4583 1.464 .203 (2)21~30 118 3.4492 (3)31~40 40 3.4750 (4)41~50 26 3.6154 (5)51~60 6 3.2500 (6)60 4 4.0625

    (1)20 6 3.4167 .775 .569 (2)21~30 118 3.5530 (3)31~40 40 3.6063 (4)41~50 26 3.7212 (5)51~60 6 3.9000 (6)60 4 3.6250

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

  • - tasty

    48

    F 1.488.05

    4-4-2

    F F(Sig)

    (1)20 6 3.3667 1.488 .196 (2)21~30 118 3.3593 (3)31~40 40 3.3350 (4)41~50 26 3.6154 (5)51~60 6 3.8800 (6)60 4 3.3500

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

    () 4-4-3

    F 1.648 (P =.180)2.015 (P =.113)1.883

    (P =.134)1.468 (P =.224)4.771 (P =.003)

  • - tasty

    49

    Scheffe

    4-4-3

    F F(Sig)

    (1) () 4 3.0000 1.648 .180 (2) () 63 3.2222 (3) () 115 3.3947 (4) 18 3.4815

    (1) () 4 3.4167 2.015 .113 (2) () 63 3.3915 (3) () 115 3.6345 (4) 18 3.5185

    (1) () 4 3.2500 1.883 .134 (2) () 63 3.4497 (3) () 115 3.6608 (4) 18 3.5370

    (1) () 4 3.3125 1.468 .224 (2) () 63 3.3730 (3) () 115 3.5395 (4) 18 3.5556

    (1) () 4 3.1875 4.771 .003 (2) () 63 3.4008 (3) () 115 3.7061 (4) 18 3.6250

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

    F 3.325P0.5

  • - tasty

    50

    4-4-4

    F F(Sig)

    (1) () 4 2.7500 3.325 .021 (2) () 63 3.3048 (3) () 115 3.4965 (4) 18 3.2778

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

    () 4-4-5

    F 2.118 (P =.065)2.360 (P =.042)2.632 (P

    =.025)1.179 (P =.321)1.755 (P =.124)

  • - tasty

    51

    4-4-5

    F F(Sig)

    (1)2 14 2.9524 2.118 .065 (2)2~3 80 3.2625 (3)3~4 59 3.4633 (4)4~5 26 3.4231 (5)5~6 11 3.5758 (6)6 10 3.2963

    (1)2 14 3.1429 2.360 .042 (2)2~3 80 3.4833 (3)3~4 59 3.7119 (4)4~5 26 3.6026 (5)5~6 11 3.6061 (6)6 10 3.3333

    (1)2 14 3.1429 2.632 .025 (2)2~3 80 3.5292 (3)3~4 59 3.7514 (4)4~5 26 3.5641 (5)5~6 11 3.6970 (6)6 10 3.3704

    (1)2 14 3.1607 1.179 .321 (2)2~3 80 3.5000 (3)3~4 59 3.5212 (4)4~5 26 3.4519 (5)5~6 11 3.6136 (6)6 10 3.5278

    (1)2 14 3.2500 1.755 .124 (2)2~3 80 3.5938 (3)3~4 59 3.5805 (4)4~5 26 3.6154 (5)5~6 11 3.8864 (6)6 10 3.7500

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

  • - tasty

    52

    F 1.034 0.5

    4-4-6

    F F(Sig)

    (1)2 14 3.1000 1.034 .399 (2)2~3 80 3.4200 (3)3~4 59 3.3627 (4)4~5 26 3.5000 (5)5~6 11 3.5091 (6)6 10 3.5333

    *P.05**P.01***P.001

  • - tasty

    53

    TASTY

    TASTYSPSS

    TASTY

    T

    t

    .05 t

    1.

    F

  • - tasty

    54

    2.357 (P =.042).522 (P =.760).315 (P =.904)1.464 (P =.203).775

    (P =.569)

    F 1.488.05

    2.

    F

    1.648 (P =.180)2.015 (P =.113)1.883 (P =.134)1.468 (P

    =.224)4.771 (P =.003)

    F 3.325P0.5

    3.

    F

  • - tasty

    55

    2.118 (P =.065)2.360 (P =.042)2.632 (P =.025)1.179 (P =.321)

    1.755 (P =.124)

    F 1.034 0.5

  • - tasty

    56

    TastyTASTY

  • - tasty

    57

  • - tasty

    58

    ;;(2006)

    (2008)

    (Wan-Ju Weng);(Man-Tsai Wu)

    2 1 (2007/10)

    97-105

    (2002) 7-11

    (1995)

    5837-64

    (1986)

    (2000)

  • - tasty

    59

    (2005)-

    (2006)

    -

    (1992)

    (2005)/

    (2004)-

    259-88

    (2004)-

  • - tasty

    60

    : 1. 2. 20 21~3031~4041~5051~6061 3. () () () 4. 5. 22~33~44~55~66 :

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • - tasty

    61

    10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 :

    1 2 3Tasty 4 5

    ~~

    ~