occurrence, composition and risk assessment of antibiotics ... · occurrence, composition and risk...
TRANSCRIPT
Occurrence, composition and risk assessment of antibiotics in soilsfrom Kenya, Africa
Yuyi Yang1,2 • Anita Awino Owino1,2,3 • Yan Gao4 • Xue Yan1,2 • Chen Xu1,2,3 •
Jun Wang1,2
Accepted: 11 May 2016
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Abstract Antibiotics can accumulate in soils via different
ways, which may pose serious threat to ecological envi-
ronment of soil and quality of agricultural products. In this
study, the occurrence of 12 antibiotics including four sul-
fonamides (SAs), four tetracyclines (TETs) and four fluo-
roquinolones (FQs) was investigated in soils from four
sampling sites of Kenya (Mai Mahiu, Narok, Mount Suswa
Conservancy, and Juja), Africa. The soils in suburban area
of Narok had the highest average concentrations of total 12
antibiotics with an average value of 43.64 lg kg-1 dw (dry
weight), followed by Mai Mahiu (26.70 lg kg-1 dw), Juja
(24.41 lg kg-1 dw) and Mount Suswa Conservancy
(12.21 lg kg-1 dw). Sulfamethoxazole, sulfamethazine,
oxytetracycline, and enrofloxacin were identified as the
main antibiotics polluted in soils. Total organic carbon may
influence the distribution of SAs in Narok and FQs in Juja.
Ecological risk analysis based on the risk quotient showed
that SAs detected in soils have higher risk compared to
TETs and FQs.
Keywords Kenya � Soils � Sulfonamides � Tetracyclines �Fluoroquinolones � Risk assessment
Introduction
Antibiotics are not only widely used in medicine to save
human lives or to control disease in factory farming (Durso
and Cook 2014; Gothwal and Shashidhar 2015), resulting
in lots of antibiotics in wastewater treatment plant (Michael
et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2013) and livestock manure (Ho
et al. 2014, 2015; Prosser and Sibley 2015). However,
conventional sewage treatment facilities were never
designed to deal with pharmaceutical compounds, so the
removal efficiency of antibiotics was not stable and lots of
antibiotics were discharged into the environment (Michael
et al. 2013). Soil is also regarded as one of the important
media for existence and transformation of antibiotics (Tolls
2001; Zhang et al. 2011). Antibiotics entered into the soil
via sewage irrigation and manure fertilizer, and so on.
Antibiotics in soils has showed toxic effect on soil
microorganism (Liu et al. 2015; Reichel et al. 2015) and
plant (Du and Liu 2012; Jin et al. 2009). So, it is critical to
assess the levels of antibiotics in soils to avoid potential
health risk via plant (Li et al. 2014; Prosser and Sibley
2015). Degradation and adsorption were the two main
environmental behaviors of antibiotics in soil. Adsorption
mechanism of antibiotics in soil was mainly due to charge
transfer and ion interactions, and was significantly influ-
enced by the pH of the soil (Thiele-Bruhn 2003; Tolls
2001). Antibiotics were susceptible to microbial degrada-
tion under aerobic conditions (Pan and Chu 2016).
In Africa, no adequately enforced legislations regarding
antibiotic use in food-producing animals as well as moni-
toring and control of their residues are carried out (Nonga
et al. 2010). Hence, lots of antibiotics in Africa are not only
discharged into the environment, but also found in the food
which may threat the human health. For example, all
analyzed chicken eggs contained sulfadiazine (SD) and
& Jun Wang
1 Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology,
Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Wuhan 430074, China
2 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,
China
4 Wuhan Environmental Protection Bureau, Wuhan 430022,
China
123
Ecotoxicology
DOI 10.1007/s10646-016-1673-3
59.4 % contained sulfamethazine (SMZ) residues (Mubito
et al. 2014). In Kenya, antibiotics were also widespread and
intensively used in food producing, in which tetracyclines
(TETs) and sulfonamides (SAs) accounted for more than
70 % of the total consumption (Mitema et al. 2001). TETs,
SAs and trimethoprim, nitrofurans, aminoglycosides, b-lactams, and quinolones were the most commonly used
drugs in food-producing animals in Kenya (Darwish et al.
2013). Antibiotic residues were found to be prevalent in
milk within the Nakuru district of Kenya (Shitandi and
SternesjO 2001). To the best of our knowledge, less
information is about the antibiotics in soils of Kenya and
other countries in Africa. The analysis of antibiotics found
in agricultural soils of China and Malaysia indicated fer-
tilization with animal feces might be the primary source of
antibiotics (Ho et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2014). Due to the
intensive use of antibiotics and low treatment rate of
sewage water in Kenya, it is necessary to assess the levels
of antibiotics in soils. In this study, the occurrence, dis-
tribution and risk assessment of 12 antibiotics in soils from
Kenya were investigated. The information will expand our
knowledge of antibiotic pollution in African soils and
propose useful strategies for soils management in Kenya.
Method and materials
Reagents
Four SAs including SD, SMZ, sulfameter (SME) and sul-
famethoxazole (SMX), four TETs including oxytetracy-
cline (OTC), tetracycline (TC), chlortetracycline (CTC)
and doxycycline (DC), and four fluoroquinolones including
norfloxacin (NOR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ofloxacin (OFL),
and enrofloxacin (ENR) were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, USA). Organic solvents used for
antibiotics extraction were at chromatographical grade.
Sampling sites and sample collection
The total of 58 soil samples were obtained from Kenya,
including 18 samples in the rural area of Mai Mahiu, 14
Fig. 1 The map of studied sites in Kenya, Africa
Y. Yang et al.
123
samples in the suburban area of Narok, 16 samples in the
Mount Suswa Conservancy, and ten samples in the rural
area of Juja (Fig. 1). The soil samples (0–5 cm) were
collected with a grab sampler and packed in sterile con-
tainers. Three subsamples were collected at each site, and
combined as one sample before analysis. All the sites were
in the scope of highland area of Central Kenya. The pH and
cation exchange capacity of soil in this region were 6.2–6.5
and 20.5–24.4 cmol kg-1, respectively.
Sample preparation and analysis of antibiotics
Five grams of lyophilized and ground soil samples were
extracted successively in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min
using solution mixture (15 ml of methanol, 5 ml of Na2-EDTA and 10 ml of citrate buffer at pH 5.0). The process
was repeated at three times. The mixture was collected and
centrifuged at 40009g for 5 min. The supernatants were
combined and diluted into 500 ml using deionized sterile
water. The crude extract was cleaned up and concentrated
by solid phase extraction (SPE) using Strata strong anion
exchanger (SAX) cartridges (3 ml/200 mg, Thermo, USA)
and oasis hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) cartridges
(6 ml/500 mg, Waters, UK) in series. Detail information
for extraction of antibiotics could be found in the literature
(Luo et al. 2010). High-performance liquid chromatogra-
phy-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) operated
in positive mode with electrospray ionization (ESI) was
used to separate and detect the antibiotics as literature
previously published (Kim and Carlson 2007).
Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)
Average recoveries were monitored under a strict quality
assurance and quality control to test the availability of the
method before the sample analysis. Ten replicate spiked
soil samples with a concentration of 1.0 lg kg-1 were
extracted and analyzed in the same way as all the samples.
Method blanks were analyzed routinely with field samples
to check for interference and cross contamination. The
limits of detection (LOD) based on a signal-to-noise ratio
of three (S/N = 3) ranged from 0.10 to 0.50 lg kg-1 for
soil samples. The average recoveries of the target antibi-
otics ranged from 65.2 to 124.6 %. The calibration curves
obtained for the antibiotics presented good linear rela-
tionship (R2[ 0.99) for all individual standards. All results
were corrected with the recovery and concentrations of
antibiotics in soils were reported on dry-weight.
Risk assessment
Risk quotient (RQ) values was applied to assess the eco-
logical risk of antibiotics in soils, which are calculated as the
ratio of the measured environmental concentrations (MEC;
or predicted environmental concentrations, PEC) to the
predicted no-effect concentrations (PNEC) for the specific
Table 1 Concentrations of 12 antibiotics in soils from Kenya (lg kg-1 dw)
Antibiotic Mai Mahiu (n = 18) Narok (n = 14) Mount Suswa conservancy
(n = 16)
Juja (n = 10)
Freq (%) Range Mean Freq (%) Range Mean Freq (%) Range Mean Freq (%) Range Mean
SD 5.56 nd-3.24 0.18 28.57 nd-3.83 0.54 0 nd nd 10.00 nd-3.85 0.38
SMZ 77.78 nd-24.23 5.34 85.71 nd-6.83 4.29 81.25 nd-6.79 1.37 20.00 nd-7.68 1.01
SME 5.56 nd-1.50 0.08 28.57 nd-5.79 1.13 0 nd nd 0 nd nd
SMX 77.78 nd-10.71 4.78 78.57 nd-12.47 5.10 75.00 nd-14.47 3.09 80.00 nd-3.42 1.43P
SAs 100 2.48–34.94 10.39 100 2.86–22.59 11.06 81.25 nd-17.28 4.46 80.00 nd-10.24 2.83
OTC 83.33 nd-12.93 3.62 92.86 nd-29.38 9.17 68.75 nd-5.02 1.31 90.00 nd-12.91 5.02
TC 66.67 nd-8.54 2.22 71.43 nd-14.78 3.23 31.25 nd-3.82 0.64 20.00 nd-16.02 2.79
CTC 66.67 nd-15.71 1.86 71.43 nd-37.89 6.49 43.75 nd-6.66 0.86 90.00 nd-2.86 1.51
DC 5.56 nd-0.89 0.05 21.43 nd-3.85 0.57 12.50 nd-2.59 0.29 0 nd ndP
TETs 94.44 nd-31.82 7.74 100 2.93–61.28 19.47 68.75 nd-10.56 3.11 100 0.80–30.02 9.32
NOR 50.00 nd-7.47 1.17 42.86 nd-10.34 2.26 12.50 nd-8.80 0.76 10.00 nd-3.60 0.36
CIP 38.89 nd-6.98 1.75 14.29 nd-9.88 0.83 12.50 nd-3.82 0.43 20.00 nd-4.06 0.55
OFL 66.67 nd-9.19 1.60 35.71 nd-20.71 4.00 31.25 nd-8.55 0.77 30.00 nd-1.30 0.36
ENR 72.22 nd-16.84 4.05 92.86 nd-16.91 6.02 75.00 nd-8.78 2.68 100 2.00–24.50 10.98P
FQs 100 1.05–19.75 8.57 100 3.01–28.16 13.11 81.25 nd-29.96 4.65 100 2.00–24.50 12.25P
Total 100 5.41–76.92 26.70 100 14.18–98.81 43.64 87.50 nd-47.24 12.21 100 2.80–54.95 24.41
Freq Frequency
Occurrence, composition and risk assessment of antibiotics in soils from Kenya, Africa
123
pollutants (European Commission 2003). In general,
RQ\ 0.1 indicates low risk; 0.1 B RQ\ 1 means medium
risk, and RQ C 1 symbolizes high risk (European Com-
mission 2003; Verlicchi et al. 2012). The studies about the
direct toxicity of antibiotics to the terrestrial compartment
(particularly to the soil) are few (Gao et al. 2008), leading to
the challenge in estimating the PNEC in soil. Nevertheless,
the PNECsoil values estimated from PNECwater values
through the equilibrium partition approach were recom-
mended (European Commission 2003; Martın et al. 2012;
Wu et al. 2014). In this study, the PNECsoil values of OTC,
CTC, TC, NOR, CIP, ENR, SD, and SMX were 50, 270, 30,
29.68, 25.64, 24, 0.92 and 1.19 lg kg-1, which could be
found in literatures (Halling-Sorensen et al. 2000; Robinson
et al. 2005; Thiele-Bruhn and Beck 2005; Vaclavik et al.
2004; Zhang et al. 2015). The PNECsoil value of SMZ was
0.62, which was multiplied by the soil–water partition
coefficient of SMZ (3.1 L kg-1) (Thiele-Bruhn 2003) and
PNECwater values derived from toxicity of SMZ to Daphnia
magna (202 lg L-1) (De Liguoro et al. 2009).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel
2007 and SPSS software (Version 19.0, IBM, USA). One-
way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan (D) test
was performed to test the difference between the antibiotics
in different sampling sites. Pearson correlation analysis
was applied to investigate the relationship between TOC
and concentration of antibiotics. Statistical tests were
considered significant at p\ 0.05.
Results and discussion
Profile of antibiotics in soils from Kenya
Table 1 summarizes the concentrations of 12 antibiotics in
soils from Kenya. The soils in suburban area of Narok had the
highest mean concentrations of total 12 antibiotics with mean
value of 43.64 lg kg-1 dw (dry weight), followed by soils in
Fig. 2 Composition of antibiotics in soils of Kenya, Africa. (1 Mai Mahiu, 2 Narok, 3 Mount Suswa Conservancy, 4 Juja)
Y. Yang et al.
123
Mai Mahiu (26.70 lg kg-1 dw), Juja (24.41 lg kg-1 dw)
and Mount Suswa Conservancy (12.21 lg kg-1 dw).
ANOVA analysis indicated statistical difference existed
between concentrations of total 12 antibiotics in the four sites
at p\0.05 level. For SAs, soils in Narok had highest mean
concentration of total SAs among the tested four sites, fol-
lowed by Mai Mahiu, Mount Suswa Conservancy, and Juja.
For TETs, highest mean concentration of total TETs was also
observed in Narok (19.47 lg kg-1 dw), followed by Juja
(9.32 lg kg-1 dw), Mai Mahiu (7.74 lg kg-1 dw) and
Mount Suswa Conservancy (3.11 lg kg-1 dw). The trend for
the mean concentration of total FQs was Narok
(13.11 lg kg-1 dw)[ Juja (12.25 lg kg-1 dw)[Mai
Mahiu (8.57 lg kg-1 dw)[Mount Suswa Conservancy
(4.65 lg kg-1 dw). The soils in Narok experienced serious
pollution of antibiotics compared to Mai Mahiu, Mount
Suswa Conservancy and Juja. In Narok, application of
organic residues has been recommended as a more feasible
and sustainable alternative as fertilizers (Vincent et al. 2011).
The organic residues may play an important role in the pol-
lution of antibiotics in Narok.
Composition of antibiotics in soils from Kenya
For individual antibiotic in Mai Mahiu, OTC had the
highest detect frequency (83.33 %), followed by SMZ
(77.78 %), SMX (77.78 %) and ENR (72.22 %). The other
eight antibiotics had low frequency less than 70 %
(Table 1). SMZ had the highest average concentration
(5.34 lg kg-1 dw) among the tested 12 antibiotics, fol-
lowed by SMX (4.78 lg kg-1 dw), ENR (4.05 lg kg-1
dw) and OTC (3.62 lg kg-1 dw). In suburban soils from
Narok, SMZ, SMX, TC, OTC, CTC, and ENR had the
detect frequency more than 70 %, while the detect fre-
quency of other 6 antibiotics was less than 50 %. OTC had
the highest mean concentration (9.17 lg kg-1 dw), fol-
lowed by CTC (6.49 lg kg-1 dw), ENR (6.02 lg kg-1
dw) and SMX (5.10 lg kg-1 dw). In soils of Mount Suswa
Conservancy, only three antibiotics (SMZ, SMX and ENR)
had detected frequency more than 70 %. SMX had the
highest average concentration (3.09 lg kg-1 dw), followed
by ENR (2.68 lg kg-1 dw) and SMZ (1.37 lg kg-1 dw).
In soils of Juja, the detected frequency of ENR, DC, OTC
and SMX was more than 80 %, while the detected fre-
quency of the other 8 tested antibiotics was no more than
30 %. ENR had the highest average concentration
(10.98 lg kg-1 dw), followed by OTC (5.02 lg kg-1 dw),
and TC (2.79 lg kg-1 dw). Figure 2 shows the composi-
tion of SAs, TETs and FQs in the four sites. In group of
SAs (Fig. 2a), SMX and SMZ were the main pollutants
accounting for more than 80 % of total SAs in soils of the
four sites. SMZ also found to be an important antibiotic
pollutant in chicken eggs in Africa (Mubito et al. 2014). In
group of TETs, OTC was the priority pollutant which is
responsible for more than 40 % of total TETs. DC had the
lowest percentage in the composition of total TETs
(Fig. 2b). OTC also had the most detection rate among
TETs in the beef samples collected in and around the city
of Nairobi (Darwish et al. 2013). For the group of FQs,
Table 2 Concentrations of antibiotics in soils worldwide (lg kg-1 dw)
Compounds Antibiotic Concentration and sites
SAs SD 0.11 (Beijing, China)a, 13.4 (Guangdong, China)b, nd (Malaysia)c, nd (Austria)d, nd-3.85 (Kenya, this study)
SMZ 0.37 (Beijing, China)a, 5.5 (Guangdong, China)b, nd-24.23 (Kenya, this study)
SMX 0.06 (Beijing, China)a, 23.5 (Guangdong, China)b, nd-14.47 (Kenya, this study)
SME 51.4 (Guangdong, China)b, nd-5.79 (Kenya, this study)
SAs 400 (Turkey)e
TETs OTC 80 (Beijing, China)a, 9.6 (Guangdong, China)b, nd (Austria)d, nd-29.38 (Kenya, this study)
TC 5.2 (Beijing, China)a, 44.1 (Guangdong, China)b, nd (Austria)d, nd-16.02 (Kenya, this study)
CTC 17 (Beijing, China)a, 31.1 (Guangdong, China)b,10–15 (Denmark)f, nd-38.79 (Kenya, this study)
DC 63–728 (Malaysia)c, nd-3.85 (Kenya, this study)
FQs NOR 13 (Beijing, China)a, 61.9 (Guangdong, China)b, nd-96 (Malaysia)c, 55.7 (Shandong, China)g, nd-10.34 (Kenya, this
study)
CIP 23 (Beijing, China)a, 26.9 (Guangdong, China)b, nd (Turkey)e, 104.4 (Shandong, China)g, nd-9.88 (Kenya, this study)
ENR 47 (Beijing, China)a, 99.4 (Guangdong, China)b, 36–378 (Malaysia)c, 50 (Austria)d, 50 (Turkey)e, 18.6 (Shandong,
China)g, nd-16.91 (Kenya, this study)
SAs sulfadiazine ? sulfathiazole ? sulfamethoxazole, nd not detecteda–g Noted the following references: Li et al. (2011), (2014), (2015), Ho et al. (2014), Martınez-Carballo et al. (2007), Karcı and Balcıoglu (2009)and Jacobsen et al. (2004), respectively
Occurrence, composition and risk assessment of antibiotics in soils from Kenya, Africa
123
ENR was the main pollutant accounting for 45.95–89.61 %
of the total TETs in the four sites. CIP had the lowest mean
percentage in the composition of total FQs (Fig. 2c). There
is a steady increase in consumption of quinolones since
1998 in Kenya (Mitema et al. 2001) and the concentration
of ENR in Juja even exceeded 10 lg kg-1 dw. So, more
studies on the trend and transformation of FQs pollution in
soils from Africa should be done. The composition pattern
of SAs, TETs and FQs in Mai Mahiu and Mount Suswa
Conservancy was similar (Fig. 2d). In Juja, the TETs and
FQs had higher percentage compared to SAs (Fig. 2d). In
conclusion, SMX, SMZ, OTC and ENR should be paid
more attention in soils of Kenya.
To understand the status of antibiotics in soils of Kenya,
the concentrations of antibiotics in soils from other sites
worldwide were summarized in Table 2. The concentra-
tions of SD, SMZ, SME and SMX in soils of Kenya were
lower than those in vegetable farmland soil in the Pearl
River Delta, Southern China (Li et al. 2011), and higher
than soils from greenhouse vegetable production in Beijing
(Li et al. 2015) and soils in Austria (Martınez-Carballo
et al. 2007). OTC, TC, CTC concentrations in this study
were lower than those in soils in Beijing (Li et al. 2015)
and Guangdong (Li et al. 2011) of China and Denmark
(Jacobsen et al. 2004), but higher than those in Austria
(Martınez-Carballo et al. 2007). ENR, NOR and CIP con-
centrations in soils of this study were lower than those in
soils of China (Li et al. 2011, 2014, 2015) and Malaysia
(Ho et al. 2014), but higher than those in soils from Turkey
(Karcı and Balcıoglu 2009).
The adsorption process of antibiotics onto soils was
influenced by many factors, such as pH, salinity, TOC and
metals (Tolls 2001; Zhang et al. 2011). The correlation
relationship between TOC and concentrations of SAs,
TETs, and FQs was studied using Pearson correlation
analysis. The results showed that no significant correlation
relationship was found between TOC and concentrations of
SAs, TETs, and FQs in soils from Mai Mahiu and Mount
Suswa Conservancy. In Narok, TOC only had significantly
positive correlation relationship with concentrations of SAs
(r = 0.744, p = 0.022). In Juja, only the concentrations of
FQs were found to be significantly positive with the TOC
(r = 0.789, p = 0.011). So, TOC may influence the dis-
tribution of SAs in Narok and FQs in Juja.
Risk assessment of antibiotics in the suburban soils
of Kenya
The RQ values of antibiotics are shown in Fig. 3. From
Fig. 3a, RQ values of SMX and SMZ were more than 1.0
in more than 75 % soils samples from Mai Mahiu, Narok
and Mount Suswa Conservancy, indicated a high ecologi-
cal risk of SMX and SMZ in soils from these studied areas.
RQ values of SMX and SMZ were more than 1.0 in only 40
and 20 % soils samples from the tested four sites of Juja,
respectively, indicating less ecological risk in these
regions. RQ values of SD in most 72.43 % of samples were
less than 0.1, suggesting that SD pose a low risk to soils
from all sampling sites. For TETs, all RQ values were less
than 1.0 (Fig. 3b). RQ values of TC and OTC were less
Fig. 3 RQ values of antibiotics in soils of Kenya, Africa. (1 Mai
Mahiu, 2 Narok, 3 Mount Suswa Conservancy, 4 Juja)
Y. Yang et al.
123
than 0.1 in more than 60 % soil samples of Mai Mahiu,
Mount Suswa Conservancy and Juja, while RQ values of
TC and OTC were more than 0.1 in more than 50 % soil
samples from Narok. These results indicated TC and CTC
pose a higher risk in Narok compared to the other three
sites. RQ values of CTC were less than 0.1 in most samples
in Narok, indicating that the risk of CTC was low in soils
from Narok. For groups of FQs (Fig. 3c), all the RQ values
were less than 1.0 except one sample in Juja, indicated
medium risk of FQs exist in the studied areas. More than
65 % samples in all sites had low RQ values (\0.1) of
NOR and CIP, but the percentage of samples for RQ values
of ENR exceeding 0.1 ranged from 44.4 to 90.00 %. This
suggested that ENR had a higher ecological risk compared
to NOR and CIP. In summary, the SAs detected in soils
have a higher ecological risk compared to TETs and FQs in
all sampling sites.
Conclusion
The pollution levels of antibiotics in soils of Mai Mahiu,
Narok, Mount Suswa Conservancy, and Juja from Kenya
were assessed in this study. Statistical difference existed
between concentrations of total 12 antibiotics. Narok had
the highest levels of antibiotics with a mean concentration
of 43.64 lg kg-1 dw. Compared to soils from other sites
worldwide, the pollution levels of TETs and FQs were
relatively low in Kenya. Risk analysis showed more than
75 % soils samples of Mai Mahiu, Narok and Mount Suswa
Conservancy had higher RQ values of SMX and SMZ,
indicating these soils may have a high risk of SMX and
SMZ. While all TETs and most FQs had low RQ values,
indicating the ecological risk of TETs and FQs were lower
than SAs. So, SAs should be given more attention to reduce
the misuse of SAs in livestock and increase the treatment
efficiency of SAs in the wastewater plant.
Funding This study was funded by Funding Project of Sino-Africa
Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y623321K01),
Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of
Sciences (NO. 2015282) and the Hundred Talents Program of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y329671K01).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest Yuyi Yang declares that he has no conflict of
interest, Anita Awino Owino declares that he has no conflict of
interest, Yan Gao declares that he has no conflict of interest, Xue Yan
declares that he has no conflict of interest, Chen Xu declares that she
has no conflict of interest, Jun Wang declares that he has no conflict
of interest.
Ethical approval This article does not contain any studies with
human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
References
Darwish WS, Eldaly EA, El-Abbasy MT, Ikenaka Y, Nakayama S,
Ishizuka M (2013) Antibiotic residues in food: the African
scenario. Jpn J Vet Res 61:S13–S22
De Liguoro M, Fioretto B, Poltronieri C, Gallina G (2009) The
toxicity of sulfamethazine to Daphnia magna and its additivity
to other veterinary sulfonamides and trimethoprim. Chemo-
sphere 75:1519–1524
Du L, Liu W (2012) Occurrence, fate, and ecotoxicity of antibiotics in
agro-ecosystems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:309–327
Durso LM, Cook KL (2014) Impacts of antibiotic use in agriculture:
what are the benefits and risks? Curr Opin Microbiol 19:37–44
European Commission (2013) Technical guidance document in
support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment
for new notified substances and commission regulation (EC) no
1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances, part II;
Brussels, Belgium
Gao Y, Sun X, Sun Z, Zhao N, Li Y (2008) Toxic effects of
enrofloxacin on growth rate and catalase activity in Eisenia
fetida. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 26:177–180
Gothwal R, Shashidhar T (2015) Antibiotic pollution in the environ-
ment: a review. Clean Soil Air Water 43:479–489
Halling-Sorensen B, Lutzhoft HCH, Andersen HR, Ingerslev F (2000)
Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics: comparison of
mecillinam, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin. J Antimicrob Che-
mother 46:53–58
Ho YB, Zakaria MP, Latif PA, Saari N (2014) Occurrence of
veterinary antibiotics and progesterone in broiler manure and
agricultural soil in Malaysia. Sci Total Environ
488–489:167–261
Hou J, Wan WN, Mao DQ, Wang C, Mu QH, Qin SY, Luo Y (2015)
Occurrence and distribution of sulfonamides, tetracyclines,
quinolones, macrolides, and nitrofurans in livestock manure
and amended soils of northern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res
22:4545–4554
Jacobsen AM, Halling-Sørensen B, Ingerslev F, Hansen SH (2004)
Simultaneous extraction of tetracycline, macrolide and sulfon-
amide antibiotics from agricultural soils using pressurised liquid
extraction, followed by solid-phase extraction and liquid chro-
matography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A
1038:157–170
Jin C, Chen Q, Sun R, Zhou Q, Liu J (2009) Eco-toxic effects of
sulfadiazine sodium, sulfamonomethoxine sodium and enroflox-
acin on wheat, Chinese cabbage and tomato. Ecotoxicology
18:878–885
Karcı A, Balcıoglu IA (2009) Investigation of the tetracycline,
sulfonamide, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobial compounds in
animal manure and agricultural soils in Turkey. Sci Total
Environ 407:4652–4664
Kim SC, Carlson K (2007) Quantification of human and veterinary
antibiotics in water and sediment using SPE/LC/MS/MS. Anal
Bioanal Chem 387:1301–1315
Li Y-W, Wu X-L, Mo C-H, Tai Y-P, Huang X-P, Xiang L (2011)
Investigation of sulfonamide, tetracycline, and quinolone antibi-
otics in vegetable farmland soil in the Pearl River Delta area,
southern China. J Agric Food Chem 59:7268–7276
Li XW, Xie YF, Li CL, Zhao HN, Zhao H, Wang N, Wang JF (2014)
Investigation of residual fluoroquinolones in a soil-vegetable sys-
Occurrence, composition and risk assessment of antibiotics in soils from Kenya, Africa
123
tem in an intensive vegetable cultivation area in northern China.
Sci Total Environ 468:258–264
Li C, Chen JY, Wang JH, Ma ZH, Han P, Luan YX, Lu AX (2015)
Occurrence of antibiotics in soils and manures from greenhouse
vegetable production bases of Beijing, China and an associated
risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 521:101–107
Liu B, Li YX, Zhang XL, Wang J, Gao M (2015) Effects of
chlortetracycline on soil microbial communities: comparisons of
enzyme activities to the functional diversity via Biolog
EcoPlates (TM). Eur J Soil Biol 68:69–76
Luo Y, Mao D, Rysz M, Zhou Q, Zhang H, Xu L, Alvarez JJP (2010)
Trends in antibiotic resistance genes occurrence in the Haihe
River, China. Environ Sci Technol 44:7220–7225
Martın J, Camacho-Munoz MD, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E
(2012) Distribution and temporal evolution of pharmaceutically
active compounds alongside sewage sludge treatment. Risk
assessment of sludge application onto soils. J Environ Manag
102:18–25
Martınez-Carballo E, Gonzalez-Barreiro C, Scharf S, Gans O (2007)
Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibi-
otics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut
148:570–579
Michael I, Rizzo L, McArdell CS, Manaia CM, Merlin C, Schwartz T,
Dagot C, Fatta-Kassinos D (2013) Urban wastewater treatment
plants as hotspots for the release of antibiotics in the environ-
ment: a review. Water Res 47:957–995
Mitema ES, Kikuvi GM, Wegener HC, Stohr K (2001) An assessment
of antimicrobial consumption in food producing animals in
Kenya. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 24:385–390
Mubito EP, Shahada F, Kimanya ME, Buza JJ (2014) Sulfonamide
residues in commercial layer chicken eggs in Dar-es-Salaam,
Tanzania. Am J Res Commun 2:124–132
Nonga HE, Simon C, Karimuribo ED, Mdegela RH (2010) Assess-
ment of antimicrobial usage and residues in commercial chicken
eggs from smallholder poultry keepers in Morogoro municipal-
ity, Tanzania. Zoonoses Public Health 57:339–344
Pan M, Chu LM (2016) Adsorption and degradation of five selected
antibiotics in agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 545:48–56
Prosser RS, Sibley PK (2015) Human health risk assessment of
pharmaceuticals and personal care products in plant tissue due to
biosolids and manure amendments, and wastewater irrigation.
Environ Int 75:223–233
Reichel R, Michelini L, Ghisi R, Thiele-Bruhn S (2015) Soil bacterial
community response to sulfadiazine in the soil–root zone. J Plant
Nutr Soil Sci 178:499–506
Robinson AA, Belden JB, Lydy MJ (2005) Toxicity of fluoro-
quinolone antibiotics to aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol
Chem 24:423–430
Shitandi A, SternesjO A (2001) Defection of antimicrobial drug
residues in Kenyan milk. J Food Saf 21:205–214
Thiele-Bruhn S (2003) Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in
soils—a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:145–167
Thiele-Bruhn S, Beck IC (2005) Effects of sulfonamide and
tetracycline antibiotics on soil microbial activity and microbial
biomass. Chemosphere 59:457–465
Tolls J (2001) Sorption of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils: a
review. Environ Sci Technol 35:3397–3406
Vaclavik E, Halling-Sorensen B, Ingerslev F (2004) Evaluation of
manometric respiration tests to assess the effects of veterinary
antibiotics in soil. Chemosphere 56:667–676
Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E (2012) Occurrence of
pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass
load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—a
review. Sci Total Environ 429:123–155
Vincent N, Langat B, Wendi R, Chepngeno W, Kipsat M (2011)
Economic analysis of soil fertility restoration options in potato–
bean of gardening intercropping in south-rift, Kenya. J Dev
Agric Econ 3:487–491
Wu XL, Xiang L, Yan QY, Jiang YN, Li YW, Huang XP, Li H, Cai
QY, Mo CH (2014) Distribution and risk assessment of
quinolone antibiotics in the soils from organic vegetable farms
of a subtropical city, southern China. Sci Total Environ
487:399–406
Zhang Z, Sun K, Gao B, Zhang G, Liu X, Zhao Y (2011) Adsorption
of tetracycline on soil and sediment: effects of pH and the
presence of Cu(II). J Hazard Mater 190:856–862
Zhang HB, Luo YM, Wu LH, Huang YJ, Christie P (2015) Residues
and potential ecological risks of veterinary antibiotics in
manures and composts associated with protected vegetable farm-
ing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5908–5918
Zhou L-J, Ying G-G, Liu S, Zhao J-L, Yang B, Chen Z-F, Lai H-J
(2013) Occurrence and fate of eleven classes of antibiotics in
two typical wastewater treatment plants in South China. Sci
Total Environ 452:365–376
Y. Yang et al.
123