occupational diseases in portugal: contributions of a gender approach based on the analysis of...
TRANSCRIPT
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES IN PORTUGAL: CONTRIBUTIONS OF A GENDER APPROACH BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF WORKING CONDITIONS ON A LOCAL LEVELCarla Barros, Liliana Cunha & Marta SantosCPUP, University Fernando Pessoa; [email protected]; University of Porto; [email protected], University of Porto; [email protected]
69
4
10
15%
%
%
%
69% Musculoskeletal injuries
4% Skin diseases and others
15% Noise diseases caused by physical agents
10% Respiratory diseases
TOTAL OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES PER GROUPS OF DISEASES(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
STATISTICS ON OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES IN PORTUGAL2005 . 2012
Yearly average of reports of suspected occupational
disease: 3677
Yearly average of recognitions of occupational diseases: 3328
TOTAL OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES BY GENDER AND YEAR OF RECOGNITION(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
STATISTICS ON OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES IN PORTUGAL2005 . 2012
women: 58,5 % men: 41,1%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
F MYear of recognition
Num
ber o
f occ
upati
onal
dis
ease
s
Women 2003 Women 2004 Men 2003 Men 2004 Total: RLVT 2003
Total: RLVT 2004
Lisboa 108 288 43 235 151 523
Santarém 16 45 5 35 21 80
Setúbal 92 613 111 172 203 785
RLVT 216 946 159 442 375 1388
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
Repo
rts
TOTAL OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES BY GENDER AND YEAR OF RECOGNITION(Santos, Castro & Moreira, 2006)
REPORTS OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES IN LISBON AND VALE DO TEJO 2003 . 2004
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES AND GENDER2005 . 2012WOMEN(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
Musculoskeletal injuries 86%
Skin diseases and others 3%
Respiratory diseases 2%
1º Paralisias (dir) 18%
2º Epicondilite (dir) 14%
3º Paralisias (esq) 14%
4º Periartrite escapulo- humeral (dir) 12%
5º Tendinites (dir) 8%
6º Epicondilite (esq) 7%
7º Periartrite escapulo-humeral (esq) 6%
8º Tendinites (esq) 5%
9º Dermites de contacto 3%
10º Tendossinovites (dir) 2%
11º Asma profissional 2%
12º Tendossinovites (esq) 1%
Musculoskeletal injuries 38%
Respiratory diseases 26%
Physical agents – Noise 22%
Skin diseases and others 2%
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES AND GENDER2005 . 2012MEN(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
1º Hipoacusia bilateral 22%
2º Fibrose pulmonar 21%
3º Epicondilite (dir) 12%
4º Periartrite escapulo-humeral (dir) 7%
5º Epicondilite (esq) 6%
6º Periartrite escapulo-humeral (esq) 4%
7º Tendinites (dir) 3%
8º Asma profissional 3%
9º Paralisias (dir) 3%
10º Granulomatose pulmonar com insuficiência respiratória 3%
11º Paralisias (esq) 2%
12º Dermites de contacto 2%
MEN WOMEN TOTAL
2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2004
Perturbações oculares 27 27 1 1 28 28
Efeitos irritantes na pele e nas membranas mucosas 11 26 11 18 22 44
Perturbações hepáticas 1 1 0 0 1 1
Musculoskeletal injuries 16 167 129 889 145 1056
Malária 0 0 1 0 1 0
Perturbações da audição/surdez profissional 142 178 5 5 147 183
Perturbações respiratórias 18 37 12 30 30 67
Trombocitopenia 1 0 0 0 1 0
Perturbações neurológicas _ 2 _ 0 _ 21
Manifestações agudas neurodegenerativas _ 1 _ 0 _ 1
Outro diagnóstico _ 2 _ 1 _ 3
Missings 0 1 0 2 0 3
Total 216 442 159 946 375 1388
MEN(Santos, Castro & Moreira, 2006)
TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES IN LISBON AND VALE DO TEJO 2003 . 2004
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES AND GENDER2005 . 2012OCCUPATIONAL RISK FACTORS WOMEN(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
Musculoskeletal injuries 86%
Skin diseases and others 3%
Respiratory diseases 2%
1st Overloading tendons and tissues
2nd Pressure on the nerves from applied force, position, rhythm or use of tools
3rd Physical, chemical and biological agents
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES AND GENDER2005 . 2012OCCUPATIONAL RISK FACTORS MEN(Barros-Duarte, & Moreira, 2014)
1st Overloading tendons and tissues
2nd Noise
3rd Silica
Musculoskeletal injuries 38%
Respiratory diseases 26%
Physical agents – Noise 22%
Skin diseases and others 2%
INSAT: health and work survey(Barros-Duarte, C., Cunha, L. & Lacomblez, M., 2010)
INSAT2010
ESTEV (1990, 1995) and VISAT (1996)
SIT (2000/01)
Sumer (2002/03)
Evrest (2001)
European Working Conditions Surveys (EWCS)
INSAT2010preceding surveys
INSAT2010
Assessment of working conditions and their effects on health
Emphasis placed on the viewpoint of the worker
Approach grounded on the real work activity
Integrated analysis of results under the principle of "open statistics" (Volkoff, 2010)
anchor points
women men
Vibration 4.10% (OR=3.758) 11.8% (OR=3.140)
Painful postures 24.4% (OR=2.600) 30.8% (OR=3.455)
Intense physical exertion 11.9% (OR=2.098) 26.6% (OR=1.950)
Having to hurry 66.5% (OR=1.863) n.s.
Overdemand 64.7% (OR=1.567) n.s.
Intimidation 27.9% (OR=1.428) n.s.
Exposure to other people's suffering 69.8% (OR=1.635) n.s.
USING INSAT: VARIOUS SECTORS OF ACTIVITY2010relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and influencing factors:
USING INSAT: CASE STUDY2010Branch of activity: Manufacture of Electrical and Electronic Components
N= 417 workers 68% women32% men
USING INSAT: CASE STUDY2010Branch of activity: Manufacture of Electrical and Electronic Components
Administrative staff Qualified industry workers Assembly and machine operators
% Women 62,1 0,0 73,5
% Men 37,9 100,0 26,5
Branch of activity: Manufacture of Electrical and Electronic Components
USING INSAT: CASE STUDY2010
backache (W = 50.6%; M = 45.3%);
chronic muscle pain (W = 9.2%; M = 3.3%);
varicose veins (W = 51.0%; M = 9.3%);
frequent numbness of the limbs (W = 28.5%; M = 11.3%).
Results show a higher number of musculoskeletal problems in women (26.1% compared to 23.3% in men) such as:
USING INSAT: CASE STUDY2010
the need to stand for a long time (W = 28.4%; M = 12.4%);
repetitive movements (W = 32.9%; M = 27.4%);
exposure to the risk of intimidation (W=11.4% ; M = 7.6%).
Such problems are related to:
HOW DO WE MAKE THE DIFFERENTIATED IMPACT OF WORK ON WOMEN'S HEALTH MORE VISIBLE ...?2010Occupational disease statistics are crucial, but they need to be complemented by a closer analysis of the work setting... establishing relationships between:
… working conditions and all health problems
… specificity of the work activity
… the type of work organization
… WHILE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE INSTRUMENTS THAT MEDIATE THE ANALYSIS OF THIS IMPACT?2010INSAT as a privileged mediator:
it is a boundary object (Molinié & Leroyer, 2011), creating conditions to bring together the various actors of HSW on the diagnostic level;
it goes beyond the mere releasing of information by adding to its diagnostic approach a concern for intervention on work.