observable island identification for state estimation using incidence matrix
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Observable Island Identification for State Estimation Using Incidence Matrix
1/5
Automatica. Vol. 24. No. I. pp. 71-75, 1988
Printed in Great Britain.
0005-1098/88 $3.00 + 0.00
Pergamon Journals Ltd.
© 1988 International Federationof AutomaticControl
Brief Paper
Obs e rvab le I s lan d I de n t i f i c a t io n f o r S t a t e
E s t i m a t i o n U s i n g I n c i d e n c e M a t r i x *
YOUNG H. MOON,t YOUNG M. PARK~: and KYUNG J. LEE§
K e y W ords - -S t a t e e s t im a t ion ; obse rvab i l i t y ; t opo log i ca l ana lys i s ; i n t ege r G auss e l im ina t i on ; m e te r
p l acem en t ; i r r e l evan t m easurem en t ; obse rvab l e i s l and i den t i f i ca t i on .
A b s t r ac t - -T h i s pap e r dea l s w i th t he t opo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y
ana lys i s and t he deve lopm en t o f an obse rvab l e i s l and
iden t i f i ca t i on a lgo r i t hm in l a rge pow er sys t em s by us ing t he
inc idence m a t r i x .
T he t opo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y i s ana lyzed by us ing t he
pa r t i t i oned i nc idence m a t r i x w h ich has a l l t he i n fo rm a t ion o n
t he sys t em topo logy and m easur ing po in t s a s w e l l . T he
topo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y t e s t i s pe r fo rm ed by app ly ing t he
in t ege r G auss e l im ina t i on m e thod t o t he t opo log i ca l
m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n .
F or t he i den t if i ca t ion o f obse rvab l e i s l ands , a bus g roup ing
a lgor i t hm i s deve loped on t he bas i s o f t he t opo log i ca l
obse rvab i l i t y ana lys i s unde r t he a s sum pt ion o f a l l m easu re -
m en t s be ing ze ro . T h i s a lgo r i t hm rem arkab ly r educes t he
com puta t i ona l bu rden com pared w i th t he conven t iona l
a lgo r i t hm s . A m e te r p l acem e n t a lgo r i t hm i s p r e sen t ed t o
r ecove r t he obse rvab i l i t y o f an unobse rvab l e m easurem en t
system.
1. Introduction
THE OPERATION of m odern pow er sys t em s i s based on s t a t e
e s t i m a t i o n p e r f o r m e d b y p r o c e s s i n g p r o p e r m e a s u r e m e n t
da t a . T he r e l i ab i l i t y o f s t a t e e s t im a t ion e s sen t i a l l y depends
o n t he obse rvab i l i t y o f t he sys t em s t a t e . T h e ob se rvab i l i ty o f
t he sys t em s ta t e i s r e l a t ed t o t he nu m be r o f m easurem en t s
and t he i r geograph i c d i s t r i bu t i on . E ven i f t he sys t em i s
des igned t o be obse rvab l e , t em pora ry unobse rvab i l i t y m ay
be encoun te red due t o t opo log i ca l ne tw ork changes o r
f a i l u r e s on m e te r s , R T U s (R em ote T e rm ina l U n i t s ) e t c . I n
cases w here t he sys t em i s unob se rvab l e , i t i s des i r ed t ha t t he
fo l l ow ing p rocedures a r e t aken .
( i ) I den t i fy obse rvab l e i s l ands o f t he sys t em and pe r fo rm
the s t a t e e s t im a t ion fo r each obse rvab l e i s land un t i l t he
obse rvab i l i t y fo r t he w ho le sys t em i s r ecove red .
( i i) R eco ve r t he obse rvab i l it y o f the w ho le sys tem as soon
as poss ib l e by p l ac ing a m in im a l s e t o f add i t i ona l
m easurem en t s .
Im po r t an t con t r i bu t i ons t o t he o bse rvab i l i t y ana lys is have
b e e n m a d e b y C l e m e n t s et al. (1982a, b , 198 3) . The se
au thor s e s t ab l i shed t heo re t i ca l f ounda t i ons fo r t he obse rv -
abi l i ty analys is wi th the use of the graph theory.
* R ece iv ed 4 F ebrua ry 1986 ; r ev i sed 6 J anua ry 1987 ;
r ev i sed 23 June 1987 . T he o r ig ina l ve r s ion o f t h is pape r w as
p r e s e n t e d a t t h e I F A C S y m p o s i u m o n P o w e r S y s t e m a n d
P ow er P l an t C on t ro l w h ich w as he ld i n B e i j i ng , P . R . o f
C h ina du r ing A ugu s t 1986 . T he P ub l i shed P roceed ings o f t hi s
I F A C M e e t i n g m a y b e o r d e r e d f r o m : P e r g a m o n B o o k s
L i m i t e d , H e a d i n g t o n H i l l H a ll , O x f o r d O X 3 O B W , E n g -
l and . T h i s pape r w as r ecom m ended fo r pub l i ca t i on i n r ev i sed
fo rm by A ssoc i a t e E d i to r R . V . P a t e l unde r t he d i r ec t i on o f
E d i t o r H . K w a k e r n a a k .
1 D epa r tm en t o f E l ec t r ica l E ng inee r ing , Y onse i U n ive r -
s i t y , 134 S h incho n-D on g , S eodae m oo n-K u , S eou l , K orea .
:~ D ep a r tm e n t o f E l ec t r i ca l E ng inee r ing , S eou l N a t iona l
U nive r s i t y , K orea .
§ R e s e a r c h a n d D e v e l o p m e n t C e n t e r , K o r e a E l e c t r i c
P o w e r C o r p o r a t i o n , K o r e a .
71
M ont i ce l l i and W u (1985a , b ) p r e sen t ed a com ple t e t heo ry
of ne tw ork obse rvab i l i t y w i th theo rem s , and p roposed a
s im ple a lgo r i t hm fo r t he obse rvab l e i s l and i den t i f i ca t i on and
the m easurem en t p l acem en t , based on t he ca l cu l a t i on o f
phase angles .
B a rg i e l a et al. (1985) p ropose d an i n t e r e s t i ng obse rvab i l it y
a lgo r i t hm us ing a ne tw ork f l ow t echn ique , an d H or i sbe rge r
(1985) p re sen t ed an a lgo r i t hm o f m ax im a l obse rvab l e i s l and
iden t i fi ca t ion based on sea rch ing fo r an ob se rvab i l i t y dec is i on
t ree wi th the complete theoret ical analys is .
In this s tudy, the topological observabi l i ty i s analyzed by
us ing t he pa r t i t i oned i nc idence m a t r i x w h ich has a l l t he
in fo rm a t ion o f m easur ing po in t s. A n ana logy o f t he D C
pow er f l ow m e thod t o t he D C c i r cu i t ana lys i s i s i n t roduced
s ince t he l a t t e r can be w e l l - fo rm ula t ed by us ing t he i nc idence
m a t r i x . W i th t h i s ana logy , a l l r e l a ti ons be tw een p ow e r f low s
and phase ang l e s a r e r ep l aced by t he co r r e spond ing
cur r en t -vo l t a ge r e l a t ions . A s a r e su lt , a se t o f T M E s
(T opo log i ca l M easurem en t E qua t i ons ) i s de r ived fo r t he
topo log i ca l ana lys is . T he f ea tu re o f t he T M E se t i s t ha t eve ry
e l em en t o f m a t r i x i n t he equa t i on i s an i n t ege r .
T he obse rvab i l i t y t e st i s ca r r i ed ou t by exam in ing t he r ank
of t he m easurem en t m a t r i x i n t he T M E se t . T he i n t ege r
G auss e l im ina t i on m e thod i s i n t roduced fo r t he de t e rm ina -
t i on o f m a t r i x r ank .
A p rec i se a lgo r i t hm fo r t he obse rvab l e i s l and i nden t i f i ca -
t i on i s deve loped w i th an app l i ca t i on o f a bus g roup ing
m ethod . T he bus g roup ing m e thod i s based on t he
ca l cu l a t i on o f bus vo l t ages unde r t he a s sum pt ion o f a l l
m easurem en t s be ing ze ro .
T he op t im a l m e te r p l acem en t a lgo r i t hm i s p r e sen t ed t o
r ecove r t he obse rvab i l i t y o f unobse rvab l e m easurem en t
sys t em s . T he a lgo r i t hm i s e s t ab l i shed by com bin ing t he bus
g roup ing m e thod and H or i sbe rge r ' s obse rvab i l i t y dec i s i on
t r ee a lgo r i t hm s . T he a lgo r i t hm p roduces t he m ax im a l
obse rvab l e i sl ands even fo r t opo log i ca l l y sym m et r i c sys t em s ,
and sea rches fo r t he m in im a l s e t o f add i t i ona l m easurem en t s
w hich w i l l r ecove r t he obse rvab i l i t y o f t he w ho le sys t em .
2. Topological obseroab ility analysis by incidence matrix
This sect ion deals wi th the analysis of topological
obse rvab i l i t y . W i th t he use o f i nc idence m a t r i x , t opo log i ca l
analysis i s carr ied out on the basis of measurement sys tem
m ode l ings by t he bus vo l t age r ep re sen t a t i on .
2.1. Topological observability analysis. T he obse rvab i l i t y o f
a m easurem en t sys t em depends on t he sys t em conf igu ra t i on
and t he m easurem en t p l acem en t on ly . T he p r inc ip l e o f new
topological analys is i s presented, which i s based on the
analogy of the DC load f low analysis to the c i rcui t analys is .
T he pow er sys t em pa ram e te r s have t he fo l l ow ing
prope r t i e s :
( i ) a l l l i ne pa ram e te r s a r e know n,
( i i ) l oad im pedances and gene ra to r im pedances a r e
unknow n s ince t hey change w i th s t a t e s o f l oads and
gene ra to r s .
Consider a s ix-bus system wi th e ight l ines given in F ig. 1 .
R ea l and r eac t i ve i n j ec t ion pow er s a r e m easu red a t a l l buses .
T he f l ag s i gn r ep re sen t s pow er m e te r p l ac ing . T he sys t em i s
-
8/9/2019 Observable Island Identification for State Estimation Using Incidence Matrix
2/5
7 2 B r i e f P a p e r
. . . - . X F ~
Z S
P,
F i G . 1. S ix-bus system.
P~
®
®
P6
obv ious ly obse rvab l e , s i nce a ll bus i n j ec t ions a r e know n. T he
system observabi l i ty means that a l l l ine f lows and bus
in j ec t ion pow er s can be ca l cu l a t ed f rom the m eas ured da t a .
N ow w e w i l l exam ine how a l l r ea l l i ne f l ow s can be
ca l cu l a ted f rom the m easured da t a . F o r t he s im pl i c i ty o f
ca l cu l a ti on , i t is a s sum ed tha t a l l li ne im pedan ces a r e p u re ly
im ag ina ry . S ince t he re i s no l o s s o f. r ea l pow er , t he re a r e
e igh t unknow n r ea l l i ne f l ow s f rom F , t h rough Fs . By
app ly ing t he pow er ba l ance cond i t i on t o each bus , w e have
s ix equa t i ons . H ow e ver , on ly fi ve equa t i ons am o ng them a re
l i nea r ly i ndependen t . F rom the phase ang l e r e l a t i ons , l oop
equa t i ons can be se t up us ing t he D C f low m e tho d . L oo p 1
gives an equ at ion of phase angles , 0 ,z + 023 + 03~ = 0 or
7-qFx ZzFz-
7-~F = 0 wi th l ine imp eda nce Z 1 through Z s .
S im i l a r l y , tw o m ore l oop equa t i ons can be se t up fo r l oop 2
and l oop 3 . A l l o f t hese l oop equa t i ons a r e i ndependen t .
Independen t equa t i ons t o t a l e i gh t .
C onsequen t ly t he e igh t unknow n l i ne f l ow s a r e de f in i t e ly
c a l c u l a t e d f r o m t h e a b o v e - m e n t i o n e d e i g h t i n d e p e n d e n t
equa t i ons . T h i s m eans t he sys t em i s obse rvab l e .
F or t he sys t em a t i ca l t e s t o f t opo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y , t h i s
s t udy adop t s t he fo l l ow ing p rocedures .
( i ) A ssum e a com plex cu r r en t i s m easu red fo r eve ry po in t
w here r ea l and r eac t i ve pow er s a r e m easured .
( ii ) S e t up a ll i ndepen den t l oop and noda l equa t i on s by
us ing t he i nc idence m a t r i x .
( i i i ) C heck w he the r o r no t a l l l i ne cu r r en t s can be
ca l cu l a t ed f rom the m easured cu r r en t s . I f pos s ib l e,
t hen t he sys t em i s t opo log i ca l l y . obse rvab l e . O the rw i se ,
t he sys t em i s unobse rvab l e .
2.2.
Topolog ical observability analysis algorithms u sing the
inc idence matr ix . The P-O
obse rvab i l i t y a lgo r i t hm can be
appl ied to the analysis of Q - V obse rvab i l i t y a s d i scussed
ea r l i e r by C lem en t (1982b) and H or i sb e rge r (1985). I n t h i s
con t ex t , on ly t he P - O obse rvab i l i t y w i l l be ana lyzed . T he
topo log i ca l obse rvab i l it y a lgo r i t hm i s deve lope d by r ep l ac ing
rea l pow er m easurem en t s by cu r r en t m easurem en t s .
Bus vol tage formulat ion. B us i n j ec t i on cu r r en t s can be
class if ied into m easur ed inject io n curre nts I m and un-
m easured i n j ec t i on cu rr en t s Inz . W e have t he fo l l ow ing bus
vo l t age -cu r r en t r e l a t i on by appropr i a t e o rde r ing o f bus
num ber s :
w h e r e y n u s : b u s a d m i t t a n c e m a t r i x
V B : bus vo l t age vec to r .
S imi lar ly the l ine currents can be c lass i f ied into
unm e asured l i ne cu r r en t s I , , and m easu red l i ne cu r r en t s 1 , 2,
a n d w e h a v e t h e f o l ow i n g p ri m i t iv e e d g e c u r r e n t - v o l t a g e
rela t ion:
i, 1= v.=#ATVB (2)
Ie2J
w here ) ,: p r im i t i ve adm i t t ance m a t r i x
V , : edge vo l t age vec to r
A : i nc idence m a t r i x .
W i th t he use o f t he pa r t i t i oned i nc idence m a t r i x , t he bus
in j ec t i on cu r r en t s can be expres sed a s fo ll ow s :
= 3 )
l ~ J L A 2 1 I A = J L I . 2 J
w i t h
u n m e a s u r e d m e a s u r e d
l ines l ines
r A 1 , i A , 2 ] } m easu red buses
A = L . . . ~ i ; ; ' ~ ' - ' - ~ J ) u n m e a s u r e d b u s e s.
T he p r im i t i ve m a t r i xy i s a l so pa r t i t i oned a s fo l l ow s :
u n m e a s u r e d m e a s u r e d
[ y n ~ y ,2 ] ) u n m e a s u r e d
Y = L y 2 ~ ' , . . . . ~ ' - J } m e a s u r e d . ( 4)
Subst i tut ion o f par t i t io ned A an d y into (2) gives:
y,4r4 L4 l,,
l . z J - L ~ 7 Y ~ ; ; J La T ~ , A ~ . I - w ( 5 )
B y us ing t he above equ a t i on , t he un m easu red l i ne cu r r en t 1 , ,
in (3) can be e l iminated as fol lows:
Im AH T T , T
F rom (5) and (6 ) , w e have t he fo l l ow ing equa t i ons w i th
re spec t t o V s :
_ T
I m [ A , , , ~ , : A , 1 A , , , ~ , 2 A T I A ~ , ,~ t tA 2 T t
+ X l , y , , A ~ ] V s + A I ~ I,2 7 )
In t he above equa t i ons , bus vo l t ages V s a r e t he on ly
unknow n va r i ab l e s .
T he t opo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y can now be cons ide red by
se t t i ng t he p r im i t i ve adm i t t ance m a t r i x u t o an i den t i t y
m a t r i x . T ha t i s y l l = l , y i z = O, y2 , = O, y22 = L Subst i tut ion
of t hese m a t r i ce s i n to (7 ) l eads t o
[ [ 'a l 'a 3 ~ ' : d ' ~ ' 4 : d
s i - A ,21e21 T ' T
= / A v ,
AT j - - s = M s V s
( 8 )
l e 2
a L 12 ' 22
w i th
T , T
r A , , A 1 , , A n A 2 , ]
M s = l--~---: --~,r---J.
L 12 ' 22
T he m a t r i x M s w i l l be ca l l ed t he t opo log i ca l bus
m e a s u r e m e n t m a t r ix .
C onsequen t ly , t he t opo log i ca l obse rvab i l i t y can be
d e t e r m i n e d b y c h e c k i n g t h e r a n k o f m a t r ix M s . I f t he r ank o f
M s is (N - 1 ), t hen t he m easu rem en t sys tem is obse rvab l e .
O the rw i se , t he sys t em i s unobse rvab l e .
I t i s n o t e d t h a t t h e t o p o l o g i c a l m e a s u r e m e n t m a t r i x M s
can be d i r ec t l y com posed by us ing t he pa r t i t i oned i nc idence
m a t r i x g i v e n i n ( 8 ) . M o r e o v e r , e v e r y e l e m e n t o f M s i s a n
i n te g e r . T h e r a n k o f a n i n t e g e r m a t r i x ca n b e d e t e r m i n e d b y
reduc ing t he m a t r i x t o a row eche lon fo rm by e l em en ta ry
row ope ra t i ons i nvo lv ing i n t ege r s , i . e . by p rem ui t i p l i ca t i on
by an i n t ege r m a t r i x w h ich i s un im odu la r ove r t he r i ng o f
in t ege r s . F o r t he r ank t e s t o f m a t r i x M s , t h i s s t udy has
adop ted t he i n t ege r G auss e l im ina t i on m e thod , w h ich
enab l e s us t o avo id t he nea r ly -ze ro -p ivo t p rob l em .
3. Ob serv ab le island identification
W hen a m easurem en t sys t em i s unobse rvab l e , i t i s des i r ed
to f i nd m ax im a l obse rvab l e i s l ands and pe r fo rm the s t a t e
e s t im a t ion fo r each i s l and . T he obse rvab l e i s l and i s an
o b s e r v a b le s u b n e t w o r k o f a p o w e r s y s te m . A n u n o b s e r v a b l e
pow er sys t em can be d iv ided i n to obse rvab l e i s l ands .
S uppose a p ow er sys t em cons i s t s o f t h r ee o bse rvab l e i s l ands.
T h e n , t h e m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n s c a n b e d i v i d e d i n to t h r e e
d e c o u p l e d g r o u p s o f m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n s a n d a g r o u p o f
-
8/9/2019 Observable Island Identification for State Estimation Using Incidence Matrix
3/5
Brief Paper 73
i r r e le v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n s :
l r o l i z
. . . . . . . . . . . . . o f
0 . 1 / o z . 9 )
I 0 : 0 : n / l / : O =
P h a s e a n g l e s i n e a c h i s l a n d a r e i n d e p e n d e n t o f t h e
m e a s u r e m e n t s i n o t h e r g r o u p s w h e n t h e i r r e l e v a n t
m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e r e m o v e d . E a c h o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d h a s a
s l ack bus . Al l phase ang le s a s we l l a s a l l l i ne f lows in the
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d a r e u n i q u e l y d e t e r m i n e d f r o m t h e
c o r r e s p o n d i n g g r o u p o f m e a s u r e m e n t s i f th e p h a s e a n g l e o f
t h e s l a c k b u s is a s s i g n e d . C o n s e q u e n t l y , i f we h a v e z e r o
r e a d i n g s f o r a l l m e a s u r e m e n t s , t h e n a l l l i n e f l o ws m u s t b e
z e r o a n d a l l b u s v o l t a g e s i n t h e i s l a n d m u s t b e t h e s a m e .
U n d e r t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s , s e v e r a l t h e o r e m s w i l l b e
p r e s e n t e d .
A s s u m e t h a t a l l m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e z e r o . T h e n , w e h a v e
t h e f o l l o wi n g f r o m ( 8 ) :
M BVB = 0 o r M ~ M a V a = 0. (10)
I r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s m a k e u s e n c o u n t e r g r e a t
d i f f i c u l t i e s i n d i v i d i n g t h e m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n s i n t o
d e c o u p l e d g r o u p s . F o r t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , i t
i s n e c e s s ar y t o r e m o v e a l l i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s f r o m t h e
m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n .
F o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s la n d i d e n ti f ic a t io n
a l g o r i t h m , t h e f o l l o wi n g t h e o r e m s a r e e s t a b l i s h e d .
Theorem
1 . E v e r y b o u n d a r y b u s i n je c t i o n m e a s u r e m e n t is a n
i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t .
Proof.
F o r t h e s t a t e e s t i m a t i o n o f e a c h i s l a n d i n F i g . 2 , t h e
f l ow t h r o u g h l i n e ,~ i s c o n s i d e r e d a s a b u s i n j e c t i o n . T h e l i n e
f l o w c a n n o t b e d e t e r m i n e d f r o m t h e g i v e n m e a s u r e m e n t s
s i n c e b u s e s i a n d j b e l o n g t o d i f f e r e n t o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s .
Th e r e f o r e , t h e t o t a l b u s i n j e c t i o n a t b u s i o r j is u n k n o w n .
T h i s m e a n s a n i n j e c t i o n m e a s u r e m e n t a t a n y b o u n d a r y b u s i s
a n i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t . I t i s n o t e d t h a t a n y l i ne
m e a s u r e m e n t c a n n o t b e a n i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t .
Theorem
2 . A s s u m e a l l m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e z e r o . I f d i f f e r e n t
p h a s e a n g l e s c a n b e a s s i g n e d t o t w o b u s e s u n d e r t h e
a s s u m p t i o n , t h e n t h e t w o b u s e s b e l o n g t o d i f f e r e n t
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s .
Theorem
3 . A s s u m e a l l m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e z e r o . I f a
s u b n e t w o r k i n w h i c h a l l b u s v o l ta g e s c a n n o t b e d i f f e r e n t h a s
n o i r r e le v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s , t h e n t h e s u b n e t w o r k i s a n
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d .
T h e t w o t h e o r e m s a b o v e c a n b e p r o v e d f r o m t h e d e f in i t io n
o f o b s e r v a b l e i sl a n d a n d ( 1 0 ) w i t h t h e a n a l o g y o f t h e D C
p o we r f l o w a n a l y s i s t o t h e c i r c u i t a n a l y s i s a s m e n t i o n e d
ea r l i e r .
Theorem
4 . I f a b u s m e a s u r e m e n t I B r is r e m o v e d , t h e
m o d i f i e d m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n i s g i v e n b y d e l e t i n g t h e
c o r r e s p o n d i n g ro w . U n d e r t h e a s s u m p t i o n o f z e r o r e ad i n g s
o f a l l m e t e r s , t h i s i s e q u i v a l e n t t o a m e a s u r e m e n t e q u a t i o n
o b t a i n e d b y r e p l a c i n g t h e r o w c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e
m e a s u r e m e n t b y a z e r o r o w v e c t o r .
By a p p l y i n g t h e a b o v e t h e o r e m s t o ( 1 0 ) , t h e f o l l o wi n g
a l g o r i t h m i s d e v e l o p e d f o r t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d
iden t i f i ca t ion .
( i ) As s i g n b u s n u m b e r s t o m e a s u r e d b u s e s f i rs t a n d t h e
o t h e r b u s e s n e x t . A s s i g n l i n e n u m b e r s t o u n m e a s u r e d
l ines f i r s t and the o the r l i nes nex t . In i t i a l i ze a
m e a s u r e m e n t s e t c o n s i s t i n g o f a l l a v a i l a b l e m e a s u r e -
m e n t s . S e t u p a b u s g r o u p c o n s i s t in g o f a ll b u s e s o f t h e
s y s te m a n d e s t a b l i s h t h e m e a s u r e m e n t m a t r i x M a . T h e
wh o l e s y s t e m i s c o n s i d e r e d a s a c a n d i d a t e f o r a n
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d .
( i i) Ta k e a n o b s e r v a b l e is l a n d c a n d i d a t e . S e l e c t a s l a ck b u s
f o r t h e i s l a n d a n d s e t t h e s l a c k b u s v o l t a g e t o 1 .
C o m p o s e r e d u c e d m e a s u r e m e n t m a t r i x M s R b y
s e l e c t i n g c o l u m n v e c t o r s o f M 8 c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o b u s e s
o f t h e c a n d i d a t e i s l a n d . I f t h e c a n d i d a t e i s l a n d h a s o n l y
o n e b u s , g o t o s t e p ( v ) .
Ca l c u l a t e b u s v o l t a g e s f o r t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d
c a n d i d a t e b y a p p l y i n g t h e i n t e g e r Ga u s s e l i m i n a t i o n t o
( 1 0 ) . W h e n e v e r a z e r o p i v o t i s e n c o u n t e r e d , s e t t h e b u s
v o l t a g e t o ( t h e l a r g e s t b u s v o l t a g e + 1 ) . I f o n l y o n e
z e r o p i v o t i s e n c o u n t e r e d , g o t o s t e p ( v i ) .
Co m p o s e b u s g r o u p s b y c l a s s if y i n g b u s e s w i t h s a m e b u s
v o l t a g e s i n t o o n e g r o u p ( c f . Th e o r e m 2 ) . Ea c h b u s
g r o u p i s r e g a r d e d a s a n e w o b s e r v a b l e i s la n d
c a n d i d a t e .
( v ) F i n d i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s i n t h e i s l a n d u n d e r
c o n s i d e r a ti o n b y T h e o r e m 1 , an d r e m o v e a l l t h e
i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s f r o m t h e m e a s u r e m e n t s e t .
M o d i f y th e m e a s u r e m e n t m a t r ix b y T h e o r e m 4 . G o t o
s t ep ( i i ) .
Th e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d c a n d i d a t e i s a n o b s e r v a b l e
i s l a n d . De l e t e t h e b u s g r o u p f r o m t h e s e t o f c a n d i d a t e
i s l a n d s . I f a n y o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d c a n d i d a t e r e m a i n s , g o
t o s t e p ( i i ) . O t h e r w i s e , t e r m i n a t e t h e a l g o r i t h m .
( i i i )
i v )
(v i )
Special Case.
Co n s i d e r t h e f o l l o wi n g f o u r - b u s s y s t e m ( F i g . 3 )
w i t h t w o b u s m e a s u r e m e n t s a n d o n e l i n e m e a s u r e m e n t . T h e
m e a s u r e m e n t s y s t e m i s o b s e r v a b l e s i n c e a l l o f t h e t h r e e
m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e i n d e p e n d e n t .
Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s t o p o l o g i c a l a l g o r i t h m y i e l d s t h e c o r r e c t
a n s w e r f o r o b s e r v a b i li t y . H o w e v e r , c o n d u c t i n g t h e p r o p o s e d
a l g o r i t h m y i e l d s t h e f o l l o wi n g r e s u l t : t h e m e a s u r e m e n t
s y s t e m i s u n o b s e r v a b l e , a n d t h r e e o b s e r v a b l e i s l an d s { 1 , 2 } ,
{ 3 } , ( 4 } a r e f o u n d . Th i s r e s u l t i s o b v i o u s l y wr o n g . M o n t i c e ll i
a n d W u ' s a l g o r i t h m ( 1 9 8 5 b ) a l s o y i e l d s t h e s a m e wr o n g
a n s we r . T h e w r o n g r e s u l t f o r t h i s s p e c i a l c a s e c o m e s f r o m t h e
t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y o f t h e g i v e n s y s t e m . S i n c e e v e r y l i n e
a d m i t t a n c e i s a s s u m e d t o b e 1 f o r t h e t o p o l o g i c a l a n a l y s i s ,
t h e s y s t e m i s s y m m e t r i c a l . Th i s s y m m e t r i c a l s t r u c t u r e m a k e s
t h e m e a s u r e m e n t a t l i n e 3 h a v e n o i n f o r m a t i o n o n b u s 3 o r
b u s 4 . I f we g e t r i d o f t h e t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y b y a s s i g n i n g
l i n e a d m i t t a n c e s w i t h 2 t = 1 , y - - 2 , y 3 = 1 , y 4 = 2 a n d y s = 2 ,
t h e n t h e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m y i e l d s t h e c o r r e c t a n s we r .
H o w e v e r , n o e f f ic i en t m e t h o d s h a v e b e e n f o u n d y e t t o s e a r c h
f o r t h e t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y o f s y s t e m s a n d t o g e t r i d o f t h e
s y m m e t r y s y s t e m a t i c a l l y .
Th e n e x t s e c t i o n w i l l g i v e a s i m p l e a l g o r i t h m o f m a x i m a l
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i d e n t i f i c a t i o n f o r t h e s e s p e c i a l c a se s .
s L a n d
s t nd 2
F IG . 2. Ob s e r v a b l e i s la n d s .
®
I 2
FxG. 3 . Spec ia l ca se o f fou r -bu s sys t em.
-
8/9/2019 Observable Island Identification for State Estimation Using Incidence Matrix
4/5
74 Brief Paper
4. Meter placement
W h e n a m e a s u r e m e n t s y s t e m i s u n o b s e r v a b l e , i t i s
n e c e s s a r y t o p l a c e a d d i t i o n a l m e t e r s i n o r d e r t o m a k e t h e
s y s t e m o b s e r v a b l e . I n t h e e c o n o m i c a l s e n s e , i t i s d e s i r e d t o
f i n d a m e t e r p l a c e m e n t p o l i c y w i t h a m i n i m a l m e a s u r e m e n t
s e t wh i c h e n s u r e s t h e s y s t e m o b s e r v a b i l i t y .
Th e s y s t e m o b s e r v a b i l it y c a n b e a t t a i n e d b y c o m b i n i n g a l l
o b s e r v a b l e i s la n d s w i t h a d d i t i o n a l m e a s u r e m e n t s , w h i c h
s h o u l d b e c r i t i c a l b o u n d a r y b u s i n j e c t i o r , o r l i n e m e a s u r e -
m e n t s . I n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e n u m b e r o f c r i t i c a l
m e a s u r e m e n t s , i t i s m o r e e f f i c i e n t t o s e l e c t b o u n d a r y b u s
i n j e c t i o n s wh i c h a r e c o n n e c t e d t o a s m a n y o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s
as poss ib le .
I n t h i s s t u d y a n o p t i m a l m e t e r p l a c e m e n t a l g o r i t h m i s
d e v e l o p e d b y c o m b i n i n g t h e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m a n d
Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m .
( i ) F i n d a l l o b s e r v a b l e i s l an d s b y t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d
i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a l g o r i t h m . Th e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s m a y
n o t b e m a x i m a l o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s i n c a s e s wh e r e t h e
s y s t e m h a s t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y .
( i i) Re l e a s e a ll i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t s wh i c h h a v e b e e n
r e m o v e d i n t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i d e n t i f i c a t i o n
p r o c e d u r e .
( ii i) Co n d u c t Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m wi t h th e f i n al r e s u l t
o f s t e p ( i ) . Th i s s t ep y i e ld s m a x i m a l o b s e r v a b l e i s l an d s .
( i v ) F i n d a n u n m e a s u r e d b o u n d a r y b u s wh i c h is c o n n e c t e d
t o a s m a n y o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s a s p o s s ib l e .
( v ) Ad d a b u s i n j e c t io n m e t e r t o t h e b o u n d a r y b u s .
( v i ) Co n d u c t t h e Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m b y m o d i f y i n g th e
o b s e r v a b i l i t y d e c i s io n t r e e f o r t h e a d d i t i o n a l m e a s u r e -
m e n t s . I f t h e n u m b e r o f m a x i m a l o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s i s
m o r e t h a n 1 , g o t o s t e p ( i v ) . O t h e r w i s e , p r i n t a l l t h e
a d d i t i o n a l m e a s u r e m e n t s a n d s t o p .
5. Numerical example
The 14 -bus sys t em conf igu ra t ion i s g iven in F ig . 4 . Al l
m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e i n d i c a te d b y f la gs .
T h e o b s e r v ab i l it y ha s b e e n t e s t e d b y t h e b u s m e a s u r e m e n t
m a t r i x a l g o r i t h m . Th e a l g o r i t h m y i e l d s t h e s o l u t i o n t h a t t h e
s y s t e m i s o b s e r v a b l e . F o r t h e t e s t o f t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d
i d e n t i fi c a t io n a l g o r i th m , i t is a s s u m e d t h a t t h e m e t e r a t b u s 5
f a i l s t o wo r k . By c o n d u c t i n g t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d
i d e n t i f ic a t i o n a l g o r i t h m , t h e m a x i m a l o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s h a v e
b e e n f o u n d w i t h t h e f o l l o wi n g g r o u p s o f b u s e s :
G~ = (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9}
( ind ica ted wi th a do t t ed l ine in F ig . 4 ) .
Ind iv idua l bus i s l ands : (6} , (10} , (11} , { 12} , {13} , {14} .
Th e m i n i m a l m e a s u r e m e n t s e t s wh i c h m a k e t h e f a i l e d
m e a s u r e m e n t s y s t e m o b s e r v a b l e a r e g i v e n b y :
Z l = ( b u s m e a s u r e m e n t / 1 4 } o r
Z 2 = { b u s m e a s u r e m e n t / t o } .
Co mm ent 1 . Co mputat ional e f fi c iency. A s m e n t i o n e d
e a r l i e r , Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m r e q u i r e s e x c e s s i v e c o m p u t a -
t i o n t i m e d u e t o i t s c o m b i n a t o r i a l n a t u r e . I t i s i n f e r i o r t o
M o n t i c e l l i a n d W u ' s a l g o r i t h m i n c o m p u t a t i o n s p e e d .
Th e M - W a l g o r i t h m h a s a r o u t i n e t o a s si g n b u s a n g l e s
u n d e r t h e a s s u m p t i o n o f a l l m e a s u r e m e n t s b e i n g z e r o
£ d d
8? :~ i ~$ @ ?
C [ n c h c a t e s b u s n ~ r n b e r Ill [ s o n r e j e c t i o n m e a s u r e m e n t
l £ n d lc a t e s L in e n u m b e r - ¢ - I s a L i n e - f l o w
F I G. 4 . I E E E 1 4 - b u s te s t s y s t e m w i t h m e a s u r e m e n t s e t .
w h e n e v e r a n o r s o m e i r r e l e v a n t m e a s u r e m e n t ( s ) a r e f o u n d
a n d r e m o v e d . I n t h a t r o u t i n e , a l l b u s v o l t a g e s o f t h e wh o l e
s y s t e m s h o u l d b e r e a s s i g n e d b y a p p l y i n g t h e Ga u s s
e l i m i n a ti o n to t h e f o l lo w i n g e q u a t i o n: [ G ] 0 = 0 w i t h a n
( n x n ) i n f o r m a t i o n m a t r i x [ G] .
I n t h e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m , b u s e s o f t h e n e t wo r k a r e
d i v i d e d t o b u s g r o u p s , e a c h o f wh i c h i s c o n s i d e r e d a s a
c a n d i d a t e o f t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d . W h e n a n i r r e l e v a n t
m e a s u r e m e n t i s f o u n d , t h e r e m o v a l o f t h e i r r e l e v a n t
m e a s u r e m e n t a f f e c t s o n l y t h e o b s e r v a b i l i t y o f b u s g r o u p , s a y
B u s G r o u p i , w h i ch t h e r e m o v e d m e a s u r e m e n t s b e l o n g e d t o .
Th e b u s v o l t a g e s o f Bu s Gr o u p i a r e r e a s s i g n e d f r o m t h e
f o l lo wi n g e q u a t i o n :
[ M ~ M n ] V s = 0
w h e r e M ~ M R i s an (n × n i ) ma t r ix and n i i s t he no . o f bu ses
i n Bu s Gr o u p i .
I t i s n o t e d t h a t t h e d i m e n s i o n a l i t y o f [M~MR] i s m u c h
s m a l l e r t h a n t h a t o f [ G] . Th e r e f o r e , t h e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m
r e d u c e s c o m p u t a t i o n t i m e r e m a r k a b l y c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e
M - W a l go r it h m .
Co mm ent 2 . Topological symm etry problem.
Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m e s t a b l i s h e s a n o b s e r v a b i l i t y
t r e e w i t h c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e n u m b e r o f i n d e p e n d e n t
b o u n d a r y m e a s u r e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o o n l y t h e o b s e r v a b l e
i s l a n d s u n d e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n . Th e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d s c a n b e
p u t i n t o o n e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i f M i s g r e a t e r t h a n o r e q u a l t o
( N - 1 ) . ( M is t h e n u m b e r of t h e i n d e p e n d e n t b o u n d a r y
m e a s u r e m e n t s , a n d N i s t h e n u m b e r o f t h e o b s e r v ab l e
i s l a n d s . ) Th u s , Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m h a s n o p r o b l e m i n i t s
a p p l i c a t i o n t o a n e t wo r k w i t h t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y .
Ho we v e r , Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m i s s o m e wh a t t i m e -
c o n s u m i n g s i n c e a l l p o s s i b l e c o m b i n a t i o n s o f b o u n d a r y
m e a s u r e m e n t s s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d . I n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e
e x c e s s i v e c o m p u t a t i o n t i m e we h a v e d e v e l o p e d t h e b u s
g r o u p i n g a l g o r i t h m , a n d i n o r d e r t o s o l v e t h e p r o b l e m o f
t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y we a p p l i e d Ho r i s b e r g e r ' s a l g o r i t h m a t
t h e f in a l s t a g e p r o d u c e d b y t h e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m . Th i s
c o m b i n a t i o n o f t h e t wo a l g o r i t h m s r e q u i r e s c o n s i d e r a b l y -
r e d u c e d c o m p u t a t i o n t i m e w i t h o u t a n y t o p o l o g i c a l s y m m e t r y
p r o b l e m .
6. Conclusion
To p o l o g i c a l o b s e r v a b i l i t y a n a ly s i s h a s b e e n p e r f o r m e d w i t h
t h e u s e o f t h e p a r t i t i o n e d i n c i d e n c e m a t r i x . An e f f i c i e n t
a l g o r i t h m f o r t h e o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i d e n t i f i c a t i o n h a s b e e n
d e v e l o p e d o n t h e b a s i s o f a b u s g r o u p i n g m e t h o d . A m e t e r
p l a c e m e n t a l g o r i t h m h a s b e e n p r e s e n t e d t o f i n d a m i n i m a l s e t
o f a d d i t i o n a l m e a s u r e m e n t s . Th e r e s u l t s o f t h i s s t u d y a r e
s u m m a r i z e d a s f o l l o ws .
( i ) A n e w a p p r o a c h t o t o p o lo g i c a l o b s e r v a b i l i t y a n a l y s is
h a s b e e n i n t r o d u c e d w i t h t h e u s e o f i n c i d e n c e m a t r i x .
( i i) Th e p r o p o s e d a l g o r i t h m f o r i d e n t i f ic a t i o n o f o b s e r v a b l e
i s l a n d s c o n s i d e r a b l y r e d u c e s c o m p u t a t i o n t i m e b y
a d o p t i n g a b u s - g r o u p i n g m e t h o d .
( i i i ) Th e i n t e g e r Ga u s s e l i m i n a t i o n m e t h o d h a s b e e n
a d o p t e d f o r t h e o b s e r v a b i l i t y te s t , wh i c h e n a b l e s u s t o
a v o i d t h e n e a r l y - z e r o - p i v o t p r o b l e m .
( iv ) Spec ia l ca ses o f topo log ica l ly sym me t r i ca l s t ruc tu re s in
a s y s t e m h a v e b e e n s u c c e s s f u l l y c o n s i d e r e d i n t h e
o b s e r v a b l e i s l a n d i d e n t i fi c a t io n .
( v ) A n e w m e t e r p l a c e m e n t a lg o r i th m h a s b e e n p r e s e n t e d
wi t h t h e u s e o f t h e o b s e r v a b i l i t y d e c is i o n t r e e , wh i c h
s a v es a b o u t 2 0 % o f c o m p u t a t io n t im e .
References
Barg ie l a , A. , M . R. I rv ing and M. J. H. S te r l ing 1985) .
Ob s e r v a b i l i t y d e t e r m i n a t i o n i n p o we r s y s t e m s t a t e
e s t i m a t i o n u s i n g a n e t wo r k f lo w t e c h n i q u e . I E EE P ES ,
S u m m e r M e e t i n g 1 9 8 5 .
C l e m e n t s , K . A . , G . R . K r u m p h o l z a n d P . W . D a v i s
( 1 9 8 2 a ) . S t a t e e s t i m a t o r m e a s u r e m e n t s y s t e m r e l i a b i l i t y
e v a l u a t i o n - - a n e f f i c i e n t a l g o r i t h m b a s e d o n t o p o l o g i c a l
o b s e r v a b i l i t y t h e o r y . I EEE Tr ans . PAS , P AS - 1 0 1 ,
9 9 7 - 1 0 0 4 .
C l e m e n t s , K . A . , G . R . Kr u m p h o l z a n d P . W . Da v i s
( 1 9 8 2 b ) . P o we r s y s t e m s t a t e e s t i m a t i o n w i t h m e a s u r e m e n t
-
8/9/2019 Observable Island Identification for State Estimation Using Incidence Matrix
5/5
Brief Paper 75
def ic iency: an a lgor i thm that determines the maximal
obse r vab l e subne t w or k . IEEE Trans. PAS PA S- 101 ,
3044-3052.
C l ement s , K . A . , G . R . K r umph ol z and P . W. D av i s (1983).
Pow er sys t em s t a t e e s t i ma t i on w i t h measur ement
de f i c i ency : an obse r vab i l i t y measur ement p l acement
algor i thm. IEEE Trans. PAS PAS -102, 2012-2020.
Hor i sberg er , P. P . (1985). O bserva bi l i ty analys i s for power
sys tems wi th measu rem ent defic iencies . I FA C symposium
on Elect r ic Energy Systems, Rio de Jan ei ro, Brazi l.
Mon t iceUi , A. a nd F. F. W u (1985a). Network ob servabi l i ty:
theory. IEEE Trans. PAS PAS-104, 1042-1048.
Mo nt icel l i , A. a nd F. F. Wu (1985b) . Netw ork observabi l i ty:
i den t if i ca ti on o f obse r vab l e i s l ands and meas ur eme nt
p l acement .
IEEE Trans. PAS
PAS -104, 1035-1041.