obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as...

18
Obedience • Obedience – compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker – request is perceived as a command • Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience to orders 1933-1984

Upload: virgil-briggs

Post on 19-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Obedience• Obedience

– compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker

– request is perceived as a command

• Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience to orders

1933-1984

Page 2: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Stanley Milgram’s Studies

Basic study procedure– teacher and learner

(learner always confederate)

– watch learner being strapped into chair

– learner expresses concern over his “heart condition”

Page 3: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Stanley Milgram’s Studies: Procedure Continued

• Teacher (S) goes to another room with experimenter• Shock generator panel – 15 to 450 volts, labels

“slight shock” to “XXX”• Teacher (S) asked by Experimenter (E) to give

higher shocks for every mistake Learner (A) makes

Page 4: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Stanley Milgram’s Studies• Learner protests more and

more as shock increases• Experimenter continues

to request obedience even if teacher balks saying,

• “The Experiment Requires that you continue.”

• “You have no other choice, you must continue.”

120

150

300

330

“Ugh! Hey this really hurts.”

“Ugh! Experimenter! That’s all. Get me out of here. I told you I had heart trouble. My heart’s starting to bother me now.”

(agonized scream) “I absolutelyrefuse to answer any more.Get me out of here. You can’t hold me here. Get me out.”

(intense & prolonged agonized scream) “Let me out of here. Let me out of here. My heart’s bothering me. Let me out, I tell you…”

Page 5: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience
Page 6: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Obedience

• How many people would go to the highest shock level?

• Two-Thirds (26 out of 40) of the subjects went to the end, even those that protested

• Those that did stop, not one stopped before the 300-volt level.

Page 7: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience
Page 8: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Milgram’s Obedience to Authority

(Data from Milgram, 1974)

Page 9: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Obedience to Authority

• Play “Obedience: The Milgram Study” (4:04) Segment #34 from Psychology: The Human Experience.

• Or Click HERE to view actual video from his original experiment. (5 minutes)

Page 10: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Explanations for Milgram’s Results

• Abnormal group of subjects?– Numerous replications with variety of groups

shows no support– Milgram’s study has been repeated

many times in the United States and other countries with identical results

• People in general are sadistic?– videotapes of Milgram’s subjects show extreme

distress

Page 11: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Explanations for Milgram’s Results

• A previously well-established framework to obey • The situation, or context, in which the obedience

occurred (Authority of Yale and value of science)• New situation and no model of how to behave• The gradual, repetitive escalation of the task • Experimenter self-assurance and acceptance of

responsibility• The physical and psychological separation from

the learner

Page 12: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Follow-Up Studies to Milgram

Page 13: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Conditions that Decrease the Likelihood of Destructive

Obedience • Willingness to obey diminishes sharply when the buffers

that separate the teacher from the learner are lessened or removed.

• Obedience decreased when the experimenter left the room and spoke to the subject over the telephone rather than in person.

• When teachers were allowed to act as their own authority and freely choose the shock level, 95 percent did not venture beyond 150 volts—the first point at which the learner protested

• People were more likely to defy an authority when they saw others do so

Page 14: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Critiques of Milgram

• Although 84% later said they were glad to have participated and fewer than 2% said they were sorry, there are still ethical issues

• Do these experiments really help us understand real-world atrocities?

Page 15: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Were Milgram’s Obedience Experiments Ethical?

• Attacked for the emotional stress, tension, and loss of dignity experienced by the subjects

• Milgram suggested that what was disturbing to people were not so much his methods but his results

• Follow-ups of Milgram’s subjects indicate that a large majority were glad to have taken part in the experiment and had no signs of harm or traumatic reaction

Page 16: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Does this Apply to Today?

Page 17: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Asch, Milgram, and the Real World

• Being at odds with the majority or with authority figures is very uncomfortable for most people—

• Enough so that our judgment and perceptions can be distorted and we may act in ways that violate our conscience

• Each of us does have the capacity to resist group or authority pressure but…

Will we do so?

Page 18: Obedience –compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker –request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience

Abu Ghraib Prison:“I was just following orders.”