oakville green health sciences and technology … planning/da... · wsp canada inc. (wsp) was...

OAKVILLE GREEN DEVELOPMENTS INC.

OAKVILLE GREEN HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT - PHASE I SENIOR LIVING D-6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT, OAKVILLE, ONTARIO NOVEMBER 29, 2018

WSP Canada Inc.

OAKVILLE GREEN HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT - PHASE I SENIOR LIVING D-6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT, OAKVILLE, ONTARIO

OAKVILLE GREEN DEVELOPMENTS INC. PROJECT NO.: 15M-00146-02 DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2018

WSP UNIT 2 126 DON HILLOCK DRIVE AURORA, ON, CANADA L4G 0G9 T: +1 905 750-3080 F: +1 905 727-0463 WSP.COM

WSP Canada Inc.

UNIT 2 126 DON HILLOCK DRIVE AURORA, ON, CANADA L4G 0G9 T: +1 905 750-3080 F: +1 905 727-0463 wsp.com

November 29, 2018

Dear Madam/Sir:

Subject: Senior Living D-6 Land Use Compatibility Assessment Oakville, Ontario

WSP Canada Inc. was retained to complete a D-6 Land Use Compatibility Assessment for the proposed development located at the northeast corner of Dundas Street West and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario as a result of the neighbouring industrial and commercial facilities. It is understood that Oakville Green Developments Inc. intends to develop the land for a Health Sciences and Technology District containing a mix of employment, institutional, commercial and residential uses.

The study was conducted in accordance with the “Compatibility between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses”, published by the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Guideline D-6.

This report summarizes the findings of the D-6 Land Use Compatibility Assessment of the surrounding land uses on the proposed development site.

Yours truly,

Stephanie Clarke, B.A. Environmental Consultant

SC/nah WSP ref.: 15M-00146-02

OAKVILLE GREEN HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT - PHASE I Project No. 15M-00146-02 OAKVILLE GREEN DEVELOPMENTS INC.

WSPNovember 2018

Page ii

S I G N A T U R E S

PREPARED BY

Stephanie Clarke, B.A. Environmental Consultant

November 27, 2018 Date

APPROVED1 BY

David Hofbauer, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Senior Technical Lead, Air Quality

November 27, 2018 Date

WSP Canada Inc. prepared this report solely for the use of the intended recipient, OAKVILLE GREEN DEVELOPMENTS INC., in accordance with the professional services agreement. The intended recipient is solely responsible for the disclosure of any information contained in this report. The content and opinions contained in the present report are based on the observations and/or information available to WSP Canada Inc. at the time of preparation. If a third party makes use of, relies on, or makes decisions in accordance with this report, said third party is solely responsible for such use, reliance or decisions. WSP Canada Inc. does not accept responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken by said third party based on this report. This limitations statement is considered an integral part of this report.

The original of this digital file will be conserved by WSP Canada Inc. for a period of not less than 10 years. As the digital file transmitted to the intended recipient is no longer under the control of WSP Canada Inc., its integrity cannot be assured. As such, WSP Canada Inc. does not guarantee any modifications made to this digital file subsequent to its transmission to the intended recipient.

1 Approval of this document is an administrative function indicating readiness for release and does not impart legal liability on to the Approver for any technical content contained herein. Technical accuracy and fit-for-purpose of this content is obtained through the review process. The Approver shall ensure the applicable review process has occurred prior to signing the document.


WSPNovember 2018

Page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1

2 IDENTIFYING FACILITIES WITH NUISANCE POTENTIAL .................................................... 2

2.1 Limited Concern Facilities ............................................ 2

2.1.1 Restaurants ........................................................................................... 2

2.1.2 Commercial Retail Facilities .................................................................. 3

2.1.3 Institutional Facilities ............................................................................. 3

2.1.4 Other Facilities

5

2.2.1 Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital .................................................... 5

2.2.2 Stormwater Management Pond ............................................................ 5

3 EVALUATION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES .............................................................. 5

3.1 Site Specific Meteorological Data ................................ 6

3.2 Identification of Nuisance ............................................. 7

3.2.1 Odour Assessment ................................................................................ 8

3.2.2 Noise Assessment ................................................................................. 9

4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS .......... 9

4.1 Limited Concern Facilities ............................................ 9

4.2 Potential Facilities of Concern ................................... 10

5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 10

6 REFERENCES .............................................. 11

....................................................................................... 4

2.2 Potential Facilities of Concern ....................................


WSPNovember 2018

Page iv

TABLES

TABLE 1-1 GUIDELINE D-6 RECOMMENDED MINIMUM SEPERATION DISTANCE AND POTENTIAL INFLUENCE AREAS FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND USES ................................................... 1

TABLE 3-1 WIND DATA FOR STATION #61587 .. 6 TABLE 3-2 WIND DATA, FROM OAKVILLE

TRAFALGAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TO THE SITE ....................................... 7

TABLE 3-3 WIND DATA. FROM THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND TO THE SITE ........................... 7

TABLE 3-4 SUMMARY OF ODOUR AT RECEPTORS ...................................... 8

TABLE 3-5 AVERAGE UPWIND AND DOWNWIND ODOUR NEAR LOCATIONS OF CONCERN ............... 9

FIGURES

FIGURE 1 ZONING MAP FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN FIGURE 3 SUMMARY OF FACILITIES FIGURE 4 WINDROSE FIGURE 5 LOCATION OF ODOUR AND NOISE

MEASUREMENTS

APPENDICES

A INDUSTRIAL CLASS DEFINITIONS

B SUMMARY OF FACILITIES

C ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVALS

D ODOUR MEASUREMENTS


WSPNovember 2018

Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) was retained by Oakville Green Developments Inc. to prepare a D-6 Compatibility Assessment for the property located at the northeast corner of Dundas Street West and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario (the ‘Site’). The total site area of the proposed development is approximately 13.4 ha. (33 ac.). The proposed development will consist of a 15 storey senior living building and 15 storey medical center (2.45 ac.), a 15 storey hotel and conference center (1.15 ac.), and a 15 storey employment use building (4.06 ac.) with the remainder of the a 13.4 ha. consisting of open space.

The purpose of the study is to complete an Air Quality, Dust, Noise, and Odour (Nuisance) Assessment of the surrounding area uses on the proposed development. This study will focus specifically on surrounding land use impacts on the proposed senior living building. The study was conducted in accordance with the “Compatibility between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses”, published by the Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation, and Parks (MECP) as Guideline D-6 (the ‘D-6 Guideline’).

This report describes the surrounding industrial and commercial facilities, specifically addressing the neighbouring businesses and industries within close proximity of the development site as having the highest potential to cause a nuisance. Other surrounding facilities have been evaluated as part of this investigation and are outlined in this report. The assessment was based on readily available information (i.e., facility websites, environmental registry, aerial photography, etc.).

The objective of the D-6 Guideline is to prevent or minimize the encroachment of sensitive land use upon industrial land use and vice versa. These two land uses are normally incompatible due to possible adverse effects on sensitive land uses created by industrial operations. The D-6 Guideline categorizes industrial facilities into three classes according to their size, volume of operations, and nature of their emissions and defines what a sensitive land use is. The D-6 Guideline provides definitions and examples to illustrate the three Industrial Classes, provided in Appendix A. Facilities that do not meet the definition of any one of the three Industrial Classes have little to no potential for creating nuisance issues that would give rise to complaints. For the purpose of this study, these facilities have been identified as Class 0. The definitions and examples in the D-6 Guideline relevant to air quality concerns were used to characterize the nearby facilities. The D-6 Guideline defines a recommended minimum separation distance and potential influence area between industrial facilities and sensitive land uses for each class, presented in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1 Guideline D-6 Recommended Minimum Seperation Distance and Potential Influence Areas for Industrial Land Uses

INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION

RECOMMENDED MINIMUM SEPERATION DISTANCE (m) POTENTIAL INFLUENCE AREA (m)

Class I – Light Industrial 20 70

Class II – Medium Industrial 70 300

Class III – Heavy Industrial 300 1 000


WSPNovember 2018

Page 2

2 IDENTIFYING FACILITIES WITH NUISANCE POTENTIAL

The Site is located at the northeast corner of Dundas Street West and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario. The zoning for the area of the development site is designated as existing development, and the area surrounding the proposed development is mixed use; including residential, institutional, light employment, community use, and commercial developments. The proposed development will consist of a senior living building and medical center on the west side of the Site. A hotel and conference center is proposed to be located southeast of the medical center. An employment use building is proposed to be located north of the senior living building and medical center. A zoning map and conceptual site plan are shown as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.

After reviewing maps and aerial imagery of the area, a list of possible commercial and industrial facilities that could impact the proposed senior living building was generated. These facilities were divided into four categories:

— Class 0 facilities determined to be of no concern on the development, and consisting of minor operations;

— Class I facilities determined to be of limited concern on the development;

— Class II facilities determined to have a potential adverse impact on the development; and,

— Class III facilities determined to have a potential adverse impact on the development

Table B-1 in Appendix B provides the name and address of each of the identified limited concern facilities which have a dust, noise, or odour nuisance potential for the development. Figure 3 outlines the location and identification of the facilities evaluated as part of this investigation.

2.1 LIMITED CONCERN FACILITIES

Facilities reviewed in this D-6 Compatibility Assessment were categorized as either facilities of no concern, facilities of limited concern, or facilities of potential concern with respect to the Site and the surrounding environment. Facilities of no concern or limited concern include restaurants, commercial shopping centres, recreation centres, medical facilities, and institutional facilities located outside the minimum separation distance and potential area of influence.

2.1.1 RESTAURANTS

There are 13 restaurants located in the area around the Site. Nine restaurants are in the commercial shopping centre at 2501 Third Line to the southeast of the Site including House of Wings, Pizza Nova, Bamboo Legend, Cobs Bread, Starbucks, Halton Dragon Chinese, Boardwalk Cheesecakes, Quik Chik, and Chef’s Door. One restaurant, Little Caesars Pizza, is in the commercial shopping centre at 2534 Third Line to the south-southeast of the Site. Two restaurants, Subway and Senhor Frango, are in the commercial shopping centre at 2530 Third Line to the south-southeast of the Site. One restaurant, Peppino’s Oven, is in the commercial shopping centre at 2015 Kingsridge Drive to the southeast of the Site.

Restaurants have been identified as Class I facilities for the purpose of this study as they have the potential to emit odours and noise from exhaust fans. Odour emissions have the potential to lead to air quality and odour complaints. All restaurants identified in this study are located outside the minimum recommended separation distance and the potential area of influence; therefore, have a limited potential to adversely impact the proposed Site.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 3

2.1.2 COMMERCIAL RETAIL FACILITIES

There are 23 commercial retail facilities located in the area around the Site. Fourteen commercial facilities are in the shopping centre at 2501 Third Line to the southeast of the Site. These facilities include a hair salon, grocery store, drug store, jewellery store, weight loss clinic, nail salon, pet store, medical spa, kitchen store, optometrist, electronics repair shop, craft store, gift shop, dry cleaner, and florist. Great Clips, Oakville Nice One Nails, Crock A Doodle Oakville, Selba, Sun and Shade, and King Dry Cleaners have been classified as Class I facilities based on their operations and potential to impact air quality. Freshco, Shopper Drug Mart, and Pet Valu have been classified as Class I facilities based on their operations and potential to impact noise. Skyway Jewellers, RBC Royal Bank, Saltcreek House, Abbey Eye Care, Home, Garden and Gifts, and Heaven Scent Flowers have been classified as Class 0 facilities as potential air and noise issues from the facility operations are not expected.

Shell gas station is located southeast of the Site at 1500 Dundas Street West. Shell gas station has been classified as a Class I facility due to the potential to impact air and noise.

Royal Oak Pharmacy/Drugstore is located at 2534 Third Line and Kingsridge Pharmacy is located at 2015 Kingsridge Drive, both are south-southeast of the Site. Both pharmacies have been classified as Class I facilities due to the potential to impact noise.

Mynt Hair Studio and Super Ten Nails are located at 2530 Third Line, south southeast of the Site. They have been identified as Class I facilities due to their potential to impact air.

BMO bank is located at 2536 Third Line, south-southeast of the Site. Cell Phone Zone is located south-southeast of the Site at 2530 Third Line. These facilities have identified as Class 0 based on negligible potential to impact air and noise based on activities.

Commercial retailers considered Class I industries for nuisance typically store a product that has a low probability of fugitive emissions. Commercial retailers do not emit significant quantities of dust or odorous substances provided that the substances are contained. Noise emitted from a commercial retail facility is limited to trucks and stock movement, which is during working hours and not typically audible off property, or limited due to fences or other sight line disruptors. The commercial facilities identified in this study are located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence from the Site; therefore, they have a limited potential to cause an adverse effect.

2.1.3 INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES

Prestige Montessori School Oakville is a school located south-southeast of the Site at 2530 Third Line. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to potential noise emissions during daytime hours, especially during pick-up and drop-off times. The Little Flower Montessori School is a school located south southeast of the Site at 2110 Redstone Crescent and has been identified as a Class 0 facility. Both facilities are located outside the minimum recommended separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, have limited potential to adversely impact the Site.

Forest Trail Public School is an elementary school located east of the Site at 1406 Pine Glen Road. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to potential noise, especially during pick-up and drop-off times and air emissions from roof top stacks and HVAC units. The facility is located outside the minimum recommended separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, has limited potential to impact the Site.

Learning Ladder Childcare Centre is a day care centre and Leaps and Bounds Performance Rehabilitation is a physiotherapist clinic. Both facilities are located at 2015 Kingsridge Drive, south southeast of the Site, and have been identified as Class I facilities for potential noise emissions during daytime hours. The facilities are located outside the minimum recommended separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, have a limited potential to adversely impact the Site.

Metabolic Care Clinics is a weight loss clinic located at 2501 Third Line, southeast of the Site. The facility has been identified as a Class 0 facility as onsite operations have negligible potential to impact air and noise. As a result, the facility is not expected to adversely impact the Site.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 4

West Oak Village Long Term Care is a nursing home located at 2370 Third Line. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to onsite operations having the potential to impact air and noise. The facility operates under an ECA for one standby diesel generator and two natural gas fired boilers for comfort heating. A copy of the ECA is provided in Appendix C. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, is not expected to impact the Site.

Saint Volodymyr Cultural Centre is a banquet hall, chapel, and preschool centre located northeast of the Site at 1280 Dundas Street West. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility as operations have the potential to impact noise. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and area of influence. As a result, the facility is not expected to impact the Site.

ErinoakKids Centre for Treatment and Development is a child health care centre located west of the Site at 2000 Glenorchy Road. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to potential air and noise impacts. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, it is not expected to adversely impact the Site.

Medical One is a health clinic located at 2501 Third Line, southeast of the Site. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility as on site operations have potential to impact air. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence. As a result, the facility is not expected to adversely impact the Site.

Kingsridge Medical Centre is a health clinic and Dentistry on Kingsridge is a dental clinic. Both facilities are located at 2015 Kingsridge Drive, south southeast of the Site. The facilities have been identified as Class I facilities as onsite operations have the potential to impact air. The facilities are located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence. As a result, the facilities are not expected to adversely impact the Site.

Oakville Rehab is a rehabilitation clinic and Sun Valley Dental Centre is a dental clinic. Both facilities are located at 2534 Third Line, southeast of the Site. Oakville Rehab has been identified as a Class 0 facility as on site operations are not expected to impact air and noise. Sun Valley Dental Care has been identified as a Class I facility as operations have the potential to impact air. Both facilities are located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence. As a result, the facilities are not expected to adversely impact the Site.

2.1.4 OTHER FACILITIES

Oakville Soccer Club is an indoor and outdoor recreation centre located at 1520 Pine Glen Road, southwest of the Site. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to potential air and noise impacts. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, has limited potential to impact the Site.

Mattamy Homes – The Preserve is a Mattamy Homes sales centre located northwest of the Site at 1388 Dundas Street West. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility due to potential noise impacts. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence. As a result, the facility is not expected to impact the Site.

Whiteoaks Communications Group Limited operates out of a work site trailer located at 1303 Dundas Street West, northeast of the Site. The facility has been identified as a Class I facility as a result of potential air and noise impacts. The facility operates with an ECA for one standby diesel generator used to power electronic transmission equipment during emergency situations. A copy of the ECA is provided in Appendix C. The facility is located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, it is not expected to adversely impact the Site.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 5

2.2 POTENTIAL FACILITIES OF CONCERN

Facilities reviewed in this D-6 Compatibility Assessment were categorized as either facilities of limited concern or facilities of potential concern with respect to the Site and surrounding environment. Facilities of potential concern are within the minimum separation distance or potential area of influence. One facility of potential concern was identified in this study. An existing storm water pond located on the property was also assessed as part of this study.

2.2.1 OAKVILLE TRAFALGAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital (the ‘Hospital’) is a hospital serving Halton Region. The facility is located at 3001 Hospital Gate, approximately 38 m south and south-southwest of the Site. Based on operations, the facility has been identified as Class II with respect to air and noise. The facility operates under an ECA for five exhaust systems serving five fume hoods, six standby generators, three natural gas with fuel oil backup fired steam boilers, three natural gas with fuel oil backup fired hot water boilers, and four cooling towers. The ECA also includes an acoustic assessment report completed by Valcoustics Canada Ltd. in November 2012. A copy of the facility’s ECA can be found in Appendix C. The facility is located within the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence and as a result has the potential to adversely impact the proposed development.

2.2.2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND

An existing stormwater management (SWM) pond owned by the Town of Oakville is located on the property. The storm water pond is located approximately 50 m east of the Site. Although not classified as a facility, the storm water pond has potential to emit odour and adversely impact the Site.

3 EVALUATION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES

Industrial facilities and sensitive land uses are typically incompatible due to possible adverse effects on sensitive land uses created by industrial operations. In order to prevent or minimize the encroachment of sensitive land uses onto industrial operations, or vice-versa, the D-6 Guideline categorizes industrial facilities into three classes according to their size, volume of operations, and nature of their emissions and defines what a sensitive land use is.

The guideline outlines a recommended minimum separation distance and potential influence area between industrial facilities and sensitive land uses for each class as shown previously in Table 1-1. The minimum separation distance is the distance (property line to property line) between the incompatible development and the sensitive land use, wherein industry has the potential to cause an adverse effect. The potential area of influence is a greater distance in which the industrial operations may have the potential to cause an adverse effect, depending on onsite operations and meteorological conditions. Additionally, the facilities that are outside of their respective recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence are expected to have no potential for creating nuisance issues that would give rise to complaints.

In this assessment facilities of potential concern were analysed based on the site specific meteorological data, any pertinent Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) or ECA, field measurements, and/or site observations.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 6

3.1 SITE SPECIFIC METEOROLOGICAL DATA

Wind data averaged from 1996 – 2000 compiled from the Toronto Station (Station #61587) was analysed and applied to the area in order to determine the frequency that the wind could contribute to nuisance issues such as fugitive dust and odour as potential concerns for the Site. A ‘blowing from’ wind rose was produced for the aforementioned period, the approximated data is included in Table 3-1. The ‘blowing from’ wind rose plot is included in this report as Figure 4.

Table 3-1 Wind Data for Station #61587

WIND BLOWING FROM FREQUENCY (%) EQUIVILENT DAYS PER YEAR

WSW ~8.7 32

SW ~6.6 24

SSW ~4.2 15

S ~4.2 15

SSE ~5.6 20

SE ~6.0 22

ESE ~4.4 16

E ~5.0 18

ENE ~2.5 9

NE ~2.5 9

NNE ~2.7 10

N ~8.7 32

NNW ~10.6 39

NW ~8.6 31

WNW ~7.6 28

W ~9.0 33

CALM ~3.1 12

Based on the data presented in Table 3-1, the dominant wind direction at the Site is blowing from the north through to the west-southwest. As a result, air quality at the proposed development could potentially be adversely impacted by the Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 7

Table 3-2 Wind Data, from Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital to the Site


WNW ~7.6 28

W ~9.0 33

WSW ~8.7 32

SW ~6.6 24

TOTAL 32.2 117

According to Table 3-2, any potential impacts from the Hospital may be transported to the Site ~32.2 % of the time or 117 equivalent days per year. Due to the location of the Hospital and the nature of the onsite operations with respect to the Site, the facility may have potential to adversely impact the proposed development.

Table 3-3 Wind Data. From the Stormwater Management Pond to the Site


NNE ~3.0 11

NE ~2.8 10

ENE ~2.8 10

E ~5.0 18

ESE ~4.4 16

SE ~6.2 23

SSE ~5.5 20

TOTAL ~29.7 108

According to Table 3-3, any potential impacts from the existing SWM pond may be transported to the Site ~29.7 % of the time or 108 equivalent days per year. Due to the location of the SWM pond with respect to the Site, the pond may have potential to adversely impact the proposed development.

3.2 IDENTIFICATION OF NUISANCE

Two locations of concern have been identified in the area surrounding the Site; Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital and an existing SWM pond. The Hospital is located approximately 38 m south through south-southwest of the Site. The existing SWM pond is located approximately 50 m east of the Site. The Hospital has the potential to adversely impact air and noise at the proposed development. The Hospital operates under an ECA for air and noise; however, this ECA would have accounted for points of impingement at ground level (not elevated) and odour and noise impacts at the nearest existing sensitive or residential receptor. Therefore, the potential air and noise impacts at the Site are not known.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 8

In order to identify potential air and noise impacts from the Hospital and existing SWM pond, WSP conducted a site investigation on November 15, 2018. WSP collected upwind and downwind odour measurements around the Hospital and SWM pond. Measurement locations were determined based on prevailing wind direction at the time of the site visit. Downwind measurements were compared to upwind measurements to identify any odours that may impact the Site. During the site visit, WSP also collected noise measurements to determine background noise levels at the Site. One measurement was collected approximately 450 m southwest of the Hospital and one measurement was collected at the approximate southwest property line of the Site. Measurement locations for odour and noise are shown in Figure 5. All samples were taken at ground level.

3.2.1 ODOUR ASSESSMENT

An odour assessment at the Site was completed on November 15, 2018. Odour measurements were completed using a St. Croix Sensory Nasal Ranger® field olfactometer. Field equipment was properly calibrated prior to field use in order to ensure data validity, per the manufacturer’s instructions. The Nasal Ranger® is able to confidently measure and quantify odour strength via Dilution-to-Threshold (D/T) in ambient air. The instrument was operated by a technician screened for odour sensitivity.

Odour measurements on site were reported in D/T, which is a measure of the number of dilutions needed to make the odourous ambient air “non-detectable” by the WSP technician. The D/T is a unit of measure of odour concentration, 1 D/T represents the concentration of odour equivalent to 1 OU (odour unit) achieved from an odour panel, at which 50 % of the general population can detect the odour.

The hedonic tone of any detected odour was also noted. Hedonic tone is a subjective test which represents how pleasant or unpleasant an odour is. It ranges from +10 to -10, where a positive value represents pleasant odours and a negative value represents unpleasant odours. Where an odour was detected, the WSP technician also attempted to characterize the odour to investigate possible sources.

WSP technicians are appropriately screened and meet the selection criteria outlined in the EN 13725:2003 standard. WSP technicians re-calibrate with an odour sensitivity kit every six months.

Triplicate odour measurements were collected at eight locations around the Hospital and SWM pond. Table 3-4 summarizes the odour D/T results measured. Table 3-5 summarizes the average upwind and downwind odour measurements around the locations of concern. A detailed table of odour measurements is shown in Appendix D.

Table 3-4 Summary of Odour at Receptors

RECEPTOR ID

ODOUR (D/T)

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 SAMPLE 3

S1 ND ND ND

S2 ND ND ND

S3 ND ND ND

S4 ND ND ND

S5 ND ND ND

S6 <2 ND ND

S7 ND ND ND

S8 <2 ND ND

NOTES: ND = NO DETECTABLE ODOUR < = DETECTABLE ODOUR BELOW NASAL RANGER LOWEST D/T

For sample S6 the hedonic tone was noted by the WSP technician as -1 for one detectable sample. The odour was described by the WSP technician as exhaust, likely from nearby construction equipment.

For sample S8 the hedonic tone was noted by the WSP technician as 0 for one detectable sample. The odour was described by the WSP technician as a faint food odour, likely from Little Caesars to the east.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 9

Table 3-5 Average Upwind and Downwind Odour Near Locations of Concern

RECEPTOR ID LOCATION ODOUR (D/T) HEDONIC TONE

POTENTIAL FOR ADVERSE IMPACT

S1 Upwind of storm water pond ND - Negligible

S2 Downwind of storm water pond ND - Negligible

S7 Upwind of Hospital (southeast and

northwest buildings) ND -

Negligible

S8 Upwind of Hospital (southeast and

northwest buildings) ND -

Negligible

S5 Downwind of Hospital (southeast

and northwest buildings) ND -

Negligible

S6 Downwind of Hospital (southeast

and northwest buildings) ND -

Negligible

S3 Upwind of Hospital (northwest

building) ND

- Negligible

S7 Downwind of Hospital (northwest

building) ND

- Negligible

Notes: ND = NO DETECTABLE ODOUR < = DETECTABLE ODOUR BELOW NASAL RANGER LOWEST D/T

3.2.2 NOISE ASSESSMENT

The senior living building is expected to be designed to include inoperable windows and air conditioning. Balconies and outdoor living areas are not expected to be part of the senior living building design. Inoperable windows used in the building design will require enhanced window design and acoustical assessment to ensure that the indoor acoustical environment is suitable; this study would be conducted as part of the detailed design of the building. The Hospital will need to be assured that inoperable windows will be permanent at the senior living building for the duration of the Hospital’s operations. The noise assessment, to be completed at detailed building design, will ensure that the ability of the stationary source (Hospital) to maintain compliance with MECP requirements and obtain MECP approvals is not to be compromised by the presence of the senior living building.

4 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS

4.1 LIMITED CONCERN FACILITIES

The facilities identified to have limited concern are anticipated to have limited impact on the proposed development. There are 13 restaurants listed in Section 2.1.1 identified as Class I facilities located within 1 000 m of the Site. All of these restaurant facilities are located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, are not expected to have an adverse impact on the Site.

A total of 23 commercial facilities were identified in Section 2.1.2 of this report. These facilities have been identified as Class 0 or Class I facilities and include banks, grocery store, hair and nail salons, pharmacies, dry cleaner, gas station, and gift shop. These facilities are all located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential are of influence; therefore, are not expected to have an adverse impact on the Site.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 10

A total of 14 institutional facilities were identified in Section 2.1.3 of this report. These facilities have been identified as Class I facilities and include health care centres, schools, and a nursing home. These facilities are all located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential area of influence; therefore, are not expected to have an adverse impact on the Site.

Facilities identified as ‘Other’ in Section 2.1.4 of this report included 3 facilities within 1 000 m of the Site; these include a home sales office, recreation centre, and a long-term work site trailer. These facilities are all located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential are of influence; therefore, are not expected to have an adverse impact on the Site.

4.2 POTENTIAL FACILITIES OF CONCERN

One facility, the Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, and an existing SWM pond were studied to determine their potential impact to the Site. The Hospital is located approximately 38 m south through south-southwest of the Site while the SWM pond is located approximately 50 m east. The Hospital was identified as having the potential to impact air and noise while the SWM pond was identified as having the potential to have an odour impact at the Site. Although the Hospital operates under an existing ECA, the Site would represent a “new elevated receptor” in terms of air quality, odour, and noise. WSP completed a site visit to observe any potential air, odour, or noise nuisance at ground level. Based on the preliminary odour assessment, the Hospital and storm water pond have been identified as having a negligible impact, based on the measurement detection limit of the Nasal Ranger, on the Site at ground level. The variability of operations at the Hospital and the SWM pond load would change daily/seasonally, so a through examination of the impacts has not been assessed. The noise study to be completed as part of the detailed building design will ensure that the Site will not impact the Hospital’s ability to operate.

5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the surrounding facilities the following conclusions and recommendations are outlined below:

— As outlined in Section 2.1, restaurants, commercial retail facilities, institutional facilities, and other facilities located outside the recommended minimum separation distance and potential zone of influence were identified as facilities of limited concern.

— Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital was identified as a facility of concern for air quality and noise impacts as the facility did not meet the recommended minimum separation distance.

— An existing SWM pond located east of the property was identified as a concern due to the potential to have an odour impact at the Site.

— A preliminary odour assessment determined that, at this time and based on the measurement detection limit of the Nasal Ranger, the Hospital and SWM pond are not expected to impact the Site for odour at ground level.

— Inoperable windows used in the building design will require enhanced window design and acoustical assessment to ensure that the indoor acoustical environment is suitable. The Hospital will need to be assured that inoperable windows will be permanent at the senior living building for the duration of the Hospital’s operations. A noise study, conducted as part of the detailed design when building placement, orientation, and construction materials is known, will need to be conducted to ensure the ability of the stationary source (Hospital) to maintain compliance with MECP requirements and obtain MECP approvals is not compromised by the Site.

— If design plans for the senior living building change to exclude inoperable windows, a detailed noise study should be completed to include the Hospital as a potential noise source.


WSPNovember 2018

Page 11

6 REFERENCES — Guideline D-6 (formerly 07-09), Compatibility Between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses

— Environmental Noise Guideline – Stationary and Transportation Sources (NPC-300)

FIGURES

HOTEL-CONFRENCE

CENTER

ED

ED

ED

ED

H:\P

roj\1

8\15M

-001

46-0

2 Oak

ville

Gree

n D6\G

RPH\

15M-

0014

6-02

F1.d

wg N

ov 26

, 201

8-4:2

0pm

BY:(p

eter.b

elcou

rt)

FIGURE NO:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

DRAWN BY:

SCALE:

TITLE:

PROJECT:

126 DON HILLOCK DRIVE, UNIT 2AURORA, ONTARIO CANADA L4G 0G9

TEL.: 905-750-3080 | FAX: 905-727-0463 | WWW.WSP.COM

REV. #.CLIENT:

1

NOVEMBER 2018

15M-00146-02

PLB

1:6000

ZONING

OAKVILLE GREEN SENIOR LIVINGBUILDING D-6 ASSESSMENT

OAKVILLE GREEN DEVELOPMENT INC.

LEGEND

ED EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

1 INSTITUTIONAL

C4 SERVICE STATION

C2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL

CU COMMUNITY USE

N NATURAL AREA

O1 PARK

RL RESIDENTIAL LOW

RM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM

RH RESIDENTIAL HIGH

McCraney Creek

3RD LIN

E

DU

ND

AS S

TR

EET

WEST

PINE G

LEN R

OAD

4TH

LI

NE

HOSPITAL G

ATE

PROUDFOOT TRAIL

LAZIO LA

NE

KI N

GS

RID

GE

DR

IVE LIVERPO

OL

STR

EET

WEST HAM

ROA

D

OAKH

AVEN D

RIVE

HIGHCROFTRO

AD

WO

ODSTO

CK TRAIL

WEEPIN

G

WIL

LOW

DR

IVE

CASTLEBROOK ROAD

NEWCASTLE

CRESCEN

T

PIN

ECLI

FFRO

AD

SC

O

TCHPIN

E DRIVETO

VELL

DR

IVE

DASHWOOD DRIVE

PARKGLEN AVENUE

FID

DLE

RS W

AY

STO

NE

GLEN

CRESCENT

ER

IKA

COURT

WOODEN HILL CIRCLE

PARKGLENAVEN

UE

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community


TEL.: 905-750-3080 | FAX: 905-727-0463 | WWW.WSP.COMFIGURE NO:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SCALE:

15M-00146-02

NOVEMBER 2018

SITE PLAN

TITLE:

PROJECT:

1:10,000

100 0 10050 Metres

Data Source: Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Base Mapping, October 2016.

LEGEND

APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY

SENIOR LIVING BUILDING LOCATION

.

DRAWN BY:

PLB

CLIENT:

CHECKED BY:

REV.:

SC



Doc

umen

t Pat

h: T

:\15M

-001

46-0

2\M

XD

\15

M-0

0146

-02

F2.

mxd

-2

HOTEL-CONFRENCE

CENTER

A53

A52

A56

A50

A41

A40

A7

A42

A51

A1

A29

A28

A39

A43

A47

A48

A49

A46

A44

A45

A38

A31

A37

A35

A34

A33

A36

A55

A54

A32

A8

A30

A21

A9

A2

A11

A22

A3

A18

A17

A10

A20

A23

A24

A12

A4

A25

A5

A15

A13

A19

A14

A6

A16

A26

A27

6.0 0 6.0 metres

DISCIPLINE:

PROJECT:

CLIENT:

PROJECT NO:

DESIGNED BY:

FIGURE NO:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

ISSUE:

DATE OF:

SCALE:

DATE / DATE:

TITLE:

CLIENT REF. #:

LEGEND


TEL.: 905-750-3080 | FAX: 905-727-0463 | WWW.WSP.COM



15M-00146-02 NOVEMBER 2018

LOCATION OF FACILITIES

ENVIRONMENT

3 1:6000

SC

PLB

--

Ansi B-SCE, H:\Proj\18\15M-00146-02 Oakville Green D6\GRPH\15M-00146-02 F3.dwg , 11/26/2018 4:22:06 PM

APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY

SENIOR LIVING BUILDING PROPOSED

LOCATION

FACILITY LOCATION AND DESIGNATION

A50

WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software

WIND ROSE PLOT:

Oakville Green Senior Living D-6

COMMENTS: COMPANY NAME:

WSP Canada Inc.

MODELER:

Stephanie Clarke

DATE:

16-Nov-18

PROJECT NO.:

15M-00146-02

NORTH

SOUTH

WEST EAST

2.18%

4.36%

6.54%

8.72%

10.9%

WIND SPEED

(m/s)

>= 11.10

8.80 - 11.10

5.70 - 8.80

3.60 - 5.70

2.10 - 3.60

0.50 - 2.10

Calms: 0.00%

TOTAL COUNT:

87516 hrs.

CALM WINDS:

0.00%

DATA PERIOD:

Start Date: 01-Jan-96 - 00:00End Date: 31-Dec-00 - 23:59

AVG. WIND SPEED:

3.97 m/s

DISPLAY:

Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)

S1

S2

S8

S7

S3

N1

S4

S6

S5

3RD LIN

E

DU

ND

AS S

TR

EET W

EST

HOSPITAL G

ATE

STONE GLEN CRESCENT

WO

ODSTO

CK

TR

AIL

SHADOW

CO

UR

T

BAR

NBO

AR

D H

OLL

OW

GLEN

ORC

HY RO

AD

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community


TEL.: 905-750-3080 | FAX: 905-727-0463 | WWW.WSP.COMFIGURE NO:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

SCALE:

15M-00146-02

NOVEMBER 2018

LOCATION OF ODOUR ANDNOISE MEASUREMENTS

TITLE:

PROJECT:

1:4,000

100 0 10050 Metres

Data Source: Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Base Mapping, October 2016.

LEGEND

ODOUR & NOISE MEASUREMENT POINT

SENIOR LIVING BUILDING LOCATION

.

DRAWN BY:

PLB

CLIENT:

CHECKED BY:

REV.:

SC



Doc

umen

t Pat

h: T

:\15M

-001

46-0

2\M

XD

\15

M-0

0146

-02

F5.

mxd

-5

APPENDIX

A INDUSTRIAL CLASS DEFINITIONS

wsp.com

DEFINITIONS OF CLASSES FROM GUIDELINE D-6

CLASS I INDUSTRIAL FACILITY

A place of business for a small scale, self-contained plant or building which produces and/or stores a product which is contained in a package and has a low probability of fugitive emissions for any of the following: noise, odour, dust, and/or vibration. There are daytime operations only, with infrequent movement of products and/or heavy trucks and no outside storage.

CLASS II INDUSTRIAL FACILITY

A place of business for medium scale processing and manufacturing with outdoor storage of wastes or material (i.e. it has an open process) and/or there are periodic outputs of minor annoyance. There are occasional outputs of either point source or fugitive emissions of any of the following: noise, odour, dust, and/or vibration, and low probability of fugitive emissions. Shift operations are permitted and there is frequent movement of products and/or heavy trucks during daytime hours.

CLASS III INDUSTRIAL FACILITY

A place of business for large scale manufacturing or processing, characterized by: large physical size, outside storage of raw and finished products, large production volumes and continuous movement of products and employees during daily shift operations. It has frequent outputs of major annoyance and there is a high probability of fugitive emissions.

APPENDIX

B SUMMARY OF FACILITIES

Pro

ject

Na

me

:O

ak

vil

le G

ree

n

Se

nio

r Liv

ing

D6

Ass

ess

me

nt

Sit

e N

am

e:

Oa

kv

ille

Gre

en

Se

nio

r Liv

ing

Sit

e A

dd

ress

:O

ak

vil

le,

On

tari

o

ID#

Facilit

yA

dd

ress

Descri

pti

on

of

Op

era

tio

ns

Po

ten

tial

Issu

es

MO

EC

C D

-6

Ind

ustr

ial

Cla

ss #

Ap

pro

xim

ate

Min

imu

m

Dis

tan

ce f

rom

Sit

e

(Pro

pert

y L

ine t

o

Pro

pert

y L

ine)

(m)

MO

EC

C D

-6

Reco

mm

en

ded

Min

imu

m S

ep

ara

tio

n

Dis

tan

ce (

m)

MO

EC

C D

-6

Po

ten

tial

Are

a o

f In

flu

en

ce

(m)

A1

Oakvi

lle T

rafa

lgar

Mem

orial H

ospita

l3001 H

ospita

l Gate

Hospita

lN

ois

e, A

irII

38

70

300

A2

House o

f W

ings

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A3

Piz

za N

ova

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A4

Bam

boo L

egend

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A5

Gre

at C

lips

2501 3

rd L

ine

Hair S

alo

nA

irI

364

20

70

A6

Cobs B

read

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A7

Fre

shC

o2501 3

rd L

ine

Gro

cery

Sto

reN

ois

eI

364

20

70

A8

Shoppers

Dru

g M

art

2501 3

rd L

ine

Dru

g S

tore

Nois

eI

390

20

70

A9

Sta

rbucks

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I390

20

70

A10

Halto

n D

ragon C

hin

ese

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A11

Skyw

ay

Jew

elle

rs2501 3

rd L

ine

Jew

elle

rsN

o P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A12

Meta

bolic

Care

Clin

ics

2501 3

rd L

ine

Weig

ht Loss C

linic

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A13

Oakvi

lle N

ice O

ne N

ails

2501 3

rd L

ine

Nail

Salo

nA

irI

364

20

70

A14

Pet V

alu

2501 3

rd L

ine

Pet sto

reN

ois

eI

364

20

70

A15

Cro

ck A

Doodle

Oakvi

lle2501 3

rd L

ine

Child

ren's

Part

y serv

ice, cra

ft s

tore

Air

I364

20

70

A16

Saltc

reek H

ouse

2501 3

rd L

ine

Gift

Shop

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A17

Board

walk

Cheeseste

aks

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A18

Chef's

Door

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A19

Heave

m S

cent F

low

ers

2501 3

rd L

ine

Flo

rist

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A20

Foxc

reek A

nim

al H

ospita

l2501 3

rd L

ine

Anim

al C

linic

Air

I364

20

70

A21

Foxc

reek D

enta

l2501 3

rd L

ine

Denta

l Clin

icA

irI

364

20

70

A22

Selb

a F

ine C

abin

etr

y2501 3

rd L

ine

Hom

e furn

ishin

gs s

tore

Nois

e, A

irI

364

20

70

A23

Abbey

Eye

Care

2501 3

rd L

ine

Opto

metr

ist

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A24

Sun a

nd S

hade

2501 3

rd L

ine

Medic

al S

pa

Air

I364

20

70

A25

Quik

Chik

2501 3

rd L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I364

20

70

A26

Hom

e, G

ard

en &

Gift

s2501 3

rd L

ine

Gift

shop

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0364

20

70

A27

Kin

g D

ry C

leaners

2501 3

rd L

ine

Dry

Cle

aners

Air

I364

20

70

A28

Shell

Gas S

tatio

n1500 D

undas S

t W

Gas s

tatio

nN

ois

e, A

irI

321

20

70

A29

RB

C R

oya

l Bank

2501 3

rd L

ine

Bank

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0321

20

70

A30

Medic

al O

ne

2501 3

rd L

ine

Health

Clin

icA

irI

321

20

70

A31

Litt

le C

aesars

Piz

za2524 T

hird L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I394

20

70

A32

Roya

l Oak P

harm

acy/

Dru

gsto

re2534 T

hird L

ine

Dru

g S

tore

Nois

eI

394

20

70

A33

Pre

stig

e M

onte

ssori S

chool O

akvi

lle2530 T

hird L

ine

Monte

ssori S

chool

Nois

eI

370

20

70

A34

Cell

Phone Z

one

2530 T

hird L

ine

Repair S

erv

ice

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0370

20

70

A35

Myn

t H

air S

tudio

2530 T

hird L

ine

Hair S

alo

nA

irI

370

20

70

A36

Super

Ten N

ails

2530 T

hird L

ine

Nail

Salo

nA

irI

370

20

70

A37

Subw

ay

2530 T

hird L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I370

20

70

A38

Senhor

Fra

ngo

2530 T

hird L

ine

Resta

ura

nt

Air

I370

20

70

A39

BM

O2536 T

hird L

ine

Bank

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0350

20

70

A40

Oakvi

lle S

occer

Clu

b1520 P

ine G

len R

dIn

door/

outd

oor

Recre

atio

n C

entr

eA

ir, N

ois

eI

636

20

70

A41

Fore

st T

rail

Public

School

1406 P

ine G

len R

dE

lem

enta

ry S

chool

Air, N

ois

eI

725

20

70

A42

West O

ak V

illage L

ong T

erm

Care

2370 T

hird L

ine

Nurs

ing H

om

eA

ir, N

ois

eI

753

20

70

A43

Peppin

o's

Ove

n2015 K

ingsridge D

rR

esta

ura

nt

Air

I830

20

70

A44

Kin

gsridge M

edic

al C

entr

e2015 K

ingsridge D

rM

edic

al C

linic

Air

I830

20

70

A45

Learn

ing L

adder

Child

care

Centr

e2015 K

ingsridge D

rC

hild

care

centr

eN

o P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0830

20

70

A46

Leaps a

nd B

ounds: P

erf

orm

ance R

ehabili

tatio

n2015 K

ingsridge D

rR

ehabili

tatio

n C

linic

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0830

20

70

A47

Kin

gridge P

harm

acy

and M

edic

al C

linic

2015 K

ingsridge D

rD

rug S

tore

Nois

eI

830

20

70

A48

Dentis

try

on K

ingsridge

2015 K

ingsridge D

rD

enta

l Clin

icA

irI

830

20

70

A49

Kin

gsridge C

leaners

2015 K

ingsridge D

rD

ry C

leaners

Nois

e, A

irI

830

20

70

A50

Mattam

y H

om

es -

The P

reserv

e1388 D

undas S

t W

Hom

e B

uild

er,

offic

eN

ois

eI

508

20

70

A51

The L

ittle

Flo

wer

Monte

ssori S

chool

2110 R

edsto

ne C

rescent

Monte

ssori S

chool

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0811

20

70

A52

Sain

t V

olo

dym

yr C

ultu

ral C

entr

e1280 D

undas S

treet W

est

Banquet H

all,

Chapel a

nd P

reschool C

entr

eN

ois

eI

797

20

70

A53

White

oaks C

om

munic

atio

ns G

roup L

td1303 D

undas S

treet W

est

Offic

eN

ois

e, A

irI

1060

20

70

A54

Oakvi

lle R

ehab

2534 T

hird L

ine

Rehabili

tatio

n C

linic

No P

ote

ntia

l Issues

0394

20

70

A55

Sun V

alle

y D

enta

l Centr

e2534 T

hird L

ine

Denta

l Clin

icA

irI

394

20

70

A56

ErinoakK

ids C

entr

e for

Tre

atm

ent and D

eve

lopm

ent

2000 G

lenorc

hy

Road

Child

Heath

Care

Centr

eA

ir, N

ois

eI

180

20

70

APPENDIX

C ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVALS

Ontario

Ministryof theEnvironment

Ministèredel’Environnement

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVALAIR

NUMBER 6806-6B7RXB

Whiteoaks Communications Group Limited284 Church StreetOakville, OntarioL6L 7N2

Site Location: 1303 Dundas Street WestOakville Town, Regional Municipality of Halton, Ontario

You have applied in accordance with Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act for approval of:

- one (1) standby diesel generator set, having a rating of 80 kilowatts, to provide power for electronic transmissionequipment during emergency situations;

all in accordance with the Application for Approval (Air) dated January 31, 2005, and all supporting documentation andinformation, signed by M. Caine (President), Whiteoaks Communications Group Limited.

For the purpose of this Certificate of Approval and the terms and conditions specified below, the following definitionsapply:

(1) "Act" means the Environmental Protection Act;

(2) "Certificate" means this Certificate of Approval issued in accordance with Section 9 of the Act;

(3) "Equipment" means the diesel generator set described in the Owner's application, this Certificate and in the supportingdocumentation submitted with the application, to the extent approved by this Certificate;

(4) "Manual" means a document or a set of documents that provide written instructions to staff of the Owner;

(5) "Ministry" means the Ontario Ministry of the Environment; and

(6) "Owner" means Whiteoaks Communications Group Limited, and includes its successors and assignees.

You are hereby notified that this approval is issued to you subject to the terms and conditions outlined below:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

GENERAL

1. Except as otherwise provided by these Conditions, the Owner shall design, build, install, operate and maintain theEquipment in accordance with the description given in this Certificate, application for approval of the Equipment and thesubmitted supporting documents and plans and specifications as listed in this Certificate.

2. Where there is a conflict between a provision of any submitted document referred to in this Certificate and theConditions of this Certificate, the Conditions in this Certificate shall take precedence, and where there is a conflict betweenthe listed submitted documents, the document bearing the most recent date shall prevail.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

3. The Owner shall ensure that the Equipment is properly operated and maintained at all times. The Owner shall:

CONTENT COPY OF ORIGINAL

(1) prepare, not later than three (3) months after the date of this Certificate or the date of commissioning of the Equipment,and update, as necessary, a Manual outlining the operating procedures and a maintenance program for the Equipment,including:

(a) routine operating and maintenance procedures in accordance with good engineering practices and asrecommended by the Equipment suppliers;

(b) emergency procedures;

(c) procedures for any record keeping activities relating to operation and maintenance of the Equipment;

(d) all appropriate measures to minimize noise and odorous emissions from all potential sources;

(2) implement the recommendations of the Manual; and

(3) retain, for a minimum of two (2) years from the date of their creation, all records on the maintenance, repair andinspection of the Equipment, and make these records available for review by staff of the Ministry upon request.

The reasons for the imposition of these terms and conditions are as follows:

1. Condition Nos. 1 and 2 are imposed to ensure that the Equipment is built and operated in the manner in which it wasdescribed for review and upon which approval was granted. These conditions are also included to emphasize theprecedence of Conditions in the Certificate and the practice that the Approval is based on the most current document, ifseveral conflicting documents are submitted for review.

2. Condition No. 3 is included to emphasize that the Equipment must be maintained and operated according to a procedurethat will result in compliance with the Act, the regulations and this Certificate. In addition the Owner is required to keeprecords and provide information to staff of the Ministry so that compliance with the Act, the regulations and thisCertificate can be verified.

In accordance with Section 139 of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E-19, as amended, you may bywritten notice served upon me and the Environmental Review Tribunal within 15 days after receipt of this Notice, requirea hearing by the Tribunal. Section 142 of the Environmental Protection Act, provides that the Notice requiring the hearingshall state:

1. The portions of the approval or each term or condition in the approval in respect of which the hearing is required, and;2. The grounds on which you intend to rely at the hearing in relation to each portion appealed.

The Notice should also include:

3. The name of the appellant;4. The address of the appellant;5. The Certificate of Approval number;6. The date of the Certificate of Approval;7. The name of the Director;8. The municipality within which the works are located;

And the Notice should be signed and dated by the appellant.

This Notice must be served upon:


The Secretary*Environmental Review Tribunal2300 Yonge St., 12th FloorP.O. Box 2382Toronto, OntarioM4P 1E4

AND The DirectorSection 9, Environmental Protection ActMinistry of Environment and Energy2 St. Clair Avenue West, Floor 12AToronto, OntarioM4V 1L5

* Further information on the Environmental Review Tribunal’s requirements for an appeal can be obtained directly from the Tribunal at:Tel: (416) 314-4600, Fax: (416) 314-4506 or www.ert.gov.on.ca

The above noted works are approved under Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act.

DATED AT TORONTO this 6th day of June, 2005Aziz Ahmed, P.Eng.DirectorSection 9, Environmental Protection Act

TT/c: District Manager, MOE Halton-Peel District OfficeGreg Fullarton, Pollutech Environmental Limited


Content Copy Of Original

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Ministère de l’Environnement et de l’Action en matière de changement

climatique

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL NUMBER 3168-9WFN2X Issue Date: August 7, 2015

Halton Healthcare Services Corporation 327 Reynolds Street Oakville, Ontario L6J 3L7

Site Location: 3001 Hospital Gate Town of Oakville, Regional Municipality of Halton

You have applied under section 20.2 of Part II.1 of the Environmental Protection Act , R.S.O. 1990, c.E. 19 (Environmental Protection Act) for approval of: - one (1) exhaust system serving a fume hood, designated as EF-A605, exhausting into theatmosphere at a volumetric flow rate of 2.5 cubic metres per second, through a stack having an exitdiameter of 0.5 metres, extending 3.0 metres above the roof and 21.9 metres above grade; - one (1) exhaust system serving a fume hood, designated as EF-A507A/B, exhausting into theatmosphere at a volumetric flow rate of 3.1 cubic metres per second, through a stack having an exitdiameter of 0.5 metres, extending 3.0 metres above the roof and 21.9 metres above grade; - one (1) exhaust system serving a fume hood, designated as EF-C501, exhausting into theatmosphere at a volumetric flow rate of 0.96 cubic metres per second, through a stack having an exitdiameter of 0.69 metres, extending 3.7 metres above the roof and 20.6 metres above grade; - one (1) exhaust system serving a fume hood, designated as EF-C502, exhausting into theatmosphere at a volumetric flow rate of 0.9 cubic metres per second, through a stack having an exitdiameter of 0.69 metres, extending 3.7 metres above the roof and 20.6 metres above grade; - one (1) exhaust system serving a fume hood, designated as AH-D913, exhausting into theatmosphere at a volumetric flow rate of 23.6 cubic metres per second, through a stack having an exitdiameter of 2.04 metres, extending 6.4 metres above the roof and 51.5 metres above grade; - six (6) standby diesel generator sets, each having a rating of 2500 kilowatts, to provide power for thefacility during emergency situations; - three (3) natural gas with No. 2 fuel oil backup fired steam boilers, each having a maximum thermalrating of 17,661,637 kilojoules per hour, exhausting to the atmosphere at a maximum volumetric flowrate of 10.3 cubic metre per second through one (1) common stack having a diameter of 1.02 metres,extending 12.7 metres above the roof and 57.8 metres above grade; - three (3) natural gas with No. 2 fuel oil backup fired hot water boilers, each having a maximumthermal rating of 17,661,637 kilojoules per hour, exhausting to the atmosphere at a maximumvolumetric flow rate of 12.5 cubic metre per second through one (1) common stack having a diameterof 1.02 metres, extending 12.7 metres above the roof and 57.8 metres above grade; and

- four (4) cooling towers, each having a maximum circulation water flow rate of 9,085 litres per minute,each exhausting into the atmosphere at a maximum volumetric flow rate of 120.7 cubic metres persecond; all in accordance with the following: 1. Environmental Compliance Approval submitted by Halton Healthcare Services Corporation, datedDecember 24, 2014 and signed by Bill Bailey, Vice-President Development; and the supportinginformation including the Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report submitted by GolderAssociates Ltd., dated December 10, 2012 and signed by Emily Lau, P. Eng.; additional informationprovided by Emily Lau, P. Eng., Golder Associates Ltd., dated April 27, 2015 and April 29, 2015. 2. Acoustic Assessment Report prepared by Valcoustics Canada Ltd., dated November 21, 2012 andsigned by Terry Harding, P.Eng.; additional information and updated tables provided by Terry Harding,P.Eng. of Valcoustics Canada Ltd., dated June 4, 2015 and June 24, 2015. For the purpose of this environmental compliance approval, the following definitions apply: 1. "Acoustic Assessment Report" means the report, prepared in accordance with Publication NPC-233submitted in support of the application, that documents all sources of noise emissions and NoiseControl Measures present at the Facility. "Acoustic Assessment Report" also means the AcousticAssessment Report prepared by Valcoustics Canada Ltd., dated November 21, 2012 and signed byTerry Harding, P.Eng., including additional information and updated tables provided by Terry Harding,P.Eng. of Valcoustics Canada Ltd., dated June 4, 2015 and June 24, 2015. 2. "Approval" means this Environmental Compliance Approval, including the application andsupporting documentation listed above; 3. "Boiler" means the boilers which burn natural gas and have a fuel energy input greater than 10.5gigajoules per hour as described in the Company's application, this Approval and in the supportingdocumentation submitted with the application, to the extent approved by this Approval 4. "Company" means Halton Healthcare Services Corporation, that is responsible for the constructionor operation of the Facility and includes any successors and assigns; 5. "Director" means a person appointed by the Minister pursuant to section 5 of the EPA; 6. "District Manager" means the District Manager of the appropriate local district office of the Ministrywhere the Facility is geographically located; 7. "EPA" means the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E.19, as amended; 8. "Equipment" means equipment described in the Company's application, this Approval and in thesupporting documentation submitted with the application, to the extent approved by this Approval; 9. "Facility" means the entire operation located on the property where the Equipment is located; 10. "Generator Sets" means the emergency generator sets described in the Company's application,this Approval and in the supporting documentation submitted with the application, to the extentapproved by this Approval; 11. "Guideline A-9" means the Ministry guideline document titled "NOx Emissions from Boilers and

Heaters", dated March 2001, as amended. 12. "Manual" means a document or set of documents that provide written instructions to staff of theCompany; 13. "Ministry" means the Ministry of the Government of Ontario responsible for the EPA and includesall officials, employees or other persons acting on its behalf; 14. "Noise Control Measures" means measures to reduce the noise emission from the Facilityincluding, but not limited to silencers, acoustic louvres, enclosures, absorptive treatment, plenums andbarriers. It also means the noise control measures outlined in the Acoustic Assessment Report, and inSchedule A. 15. "Publication NPC-300" means the Ministry Publication NPC-300, "Environmental Noise Guideline,Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning", August 2013, as amended. You are hereby notified that this environmental compliance approval is issued to you subject to theterms and conditions outlined below: TERMS AND CONDITIONS GENERAL 1. Except as otherwise provided by these Conditions, the Company shall design, build, install, operateand maintain the Equipment in accordance with the description given in this Approval, application forapproval of the Equipment and the submitted supporting documents and plans and specifications aslisted in this Approval. 2. Where there is a conflict between a provision of any submitted document referred to in this Approvaland the Conditions of this Approval, the Conditions in this Approval shall take precedence, and wherethere is a conflict between the listed submitted documents, the document bearing the most recent dateshall prevail.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 3. The Company shall restrict the periodic testing of the Generator Sets to the daytime period from7:00 am to 7:00 pm. 4. The Company shall ensure that: (1) only one (1) of the six (6) standby Generator Sets, each having a rating of 2500 kilowatts,approved under this Approval, is periodically tested at any one time. (2) any combination of Boiler usage should not exceed a maximum heat input of 141,293,100 kilojoules per hour. 5. The Company shall ensure that the Equipment is properly operated and maintained at all times. TheCompany shall: (1) prepare, not later than three (3) months after the date of this Approval or the date of commissioningof the Equipment, and update, as necessary, a Manual outlining the operating procedures and amaintenance program for the Equipment, including:

(a) routine operating and maintenance procedures in accordance with good engineering practicesand as recommended by the Equipment suppliers; (b) emergency procedures; (c) procedures for any record keeping activities relating to operation and maintenance of theEquipment; (d) all appropriate measures to minimize noise and odorous emissions from all potential sources;

(2) implement the recommendations of the Manual. NATURAL GAS FIRED BOILERS 6. The Company shall ensure that any Equipment subject to Guideline A-9 is operated in compliancewith the requirements of Guideline A-9, and that the emissions of nitrogen oxides, expressedcollectively as nitrogen dioxide equivalent, from the natural gas fired boilers having a maximum heatinput greater than 10.5 gigajoules per hour, shall not exceed the nitrogen oxides emission limit of 26grams per gigajoule of input fuel energy. RECORD RETENTION 7. The Company shall retain, for a minimum of two (2) years from the date of their creation, all recordsand information related to or resulting from the recording activities required by this Approval, and makethese records available for review by staff of the Ministry upon request. The Company shall retain: (1) all records on the maintenance, repair and inspection of the Equipment; and (2) all records of any environmental complaints; including:

(a) a description, time and date of each incident to which the complaint relates; (b) wind direction at the time of the incident to which the complaint relates; and (c) a description of the measures taken to address the cause of the incident to which the complaintrelates and to prevent a similar occurrence in the future.

NOTIFICATION OF COMPLAINTS 8. The Company shall notify the District Manager, in writing, of each environmental complaint withintwo (2) business days of the complaint. The notification shall include: (1) a description of the nature of the complaint; and (2) the time and date of the incident to which the complaint relates;

NOISE 9. The Company shall:(1) implement prior to the commencement of operation of the Equipment, the Noise Control Measures

outlined in the Acoustic Assessment Report and in Schedule A.

(2) ensure, subsequent to the implementation of the Noise Control Measures that the noise emissionsfrom the Facility comply with the limits set in Ministry Publication NPC-300; and

(3) ensure that the Noise Control Measures are properly maintained and continue to provide theacoustical performance outlined in the Acoustic Assessment Report and in Schedule A.

Schedule A: Noise Control Measures - One (1) silencer for the fresh air intake of each of the six (6) emergency generators, capable ofproviding the following values of Insertion-Loss in 1/1 octave frequency bands:Centre Frequency (Hertz) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000Insertion-Loss (decibel) 7 20 35 35 35 35 30 22 - One (1) silencer for the exhaust air of each of the six (6) emergency generators, capable of providingthe following values of Insertion-Loss in 1/1 octave frequency bands:Centre Frequency (Hertz) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000Insertion-Loss (decibel) 5 17 32 32 32 32 25 17 - One (1) stack muffler for the engine combustion exhaust of each of the six (6) emergency generators,capable of providing the following values of Insertion-Loss in 1/1 octave frequency bands:Centre Frequency (Hertz) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000Insertion-Loss (decibel) 30 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 - One (1) silencer for each of the sources listed in Table A-1, below, capable of providing thecorresponding values of Insertion-Loss in 1/1 octave frequency bands, shown in Table A-2, below:

Table A-1: Noise Control Measure RequirementsLocation Noise Source IDs

(EA is Exhaust Air; OA is Outdoor/FreshAir Intake)

MinimumSilencerGrouping

Block A AHU – A02(EA) AHU – A03(EA) AHU – A04(EA) AHU – A05(EA) AHU – A06(EA) AHU – A07(EA)

Group 1 Silencing

Block D AHU – D01(EA) AHU – D02A(EA) AHU – D02B(EA) AHU – D03(EA) AHU – D04(EA) AHU –D05(EA) AHU – D06(EA) AHU – D07(EA) AHU – D08(EA) AHU – D09(EA) AHU – D10(EA) AHU – D12(EA) EF – D902

Group 1 Silencing

EF – D906Block A AHU – A01(EA)

AHU – A08(EA) AHU – A10(EA)

Group 2 Silencing

Block D AHU – D03(OA) AHU – D04(OA) AHU – D10(OA) AHU – D11(OA) AHU – D12(OA)

Group 2 Silencing

Block C AHU – C03(OA) AHU – C04(OA) AHU – C08(OA) AHU – C10(OA) AHU – C15A(OA) AHU – C01(EA) AHU – C02A(EA) AHU – C02B(EA) AHU – C03(EA) AHU – C04(EA) AHU – C05A(EA) AHU – C05B(EA) AHU – C06A(EA) AHU – C06B(EA) AHU – C07(EA) AHU – C08(EA) AHU – C09A(EA) AHU – C09B(EA) AHU – C10(EA) AHU – C12(EA) AHU – C14(EA) AHU – C15A(EA) AHU – C15B(EA)

Group 3 Silencing

Block D AHU – D05(OA) AHU – D06(OA) AHU – D08(OA) AHU – D09(OA)

Group 3 Silencing

Block A all AHU’s – Fresh Air Intakes integral silencersby manufacturer

Table A-2: Minimum Required Insertion Losses (in decibels)

Centre Frequency(Hertz)

63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

Group 1 Silencing 2 6 15 20 20 20 10 2Group 2 Silencing 2 6 12 14 14 10 6 2Group 3 Silencing 2 4 10 10 10 9 6 4


1. Condition Nos. 1 and 2 are imposed to ensure that the Equipment is built and operated in themanner in which it was described for review and upon which approval was granted. These conditionsare also included to emphasize the precedence of Conditions in the Approval and the practice that theApproval is based on the most current document, if several conflicting documents are submitted forreview.

2. Condition No. 3 is included to ensure that the proposed operation, excluding emergency situations,is not extended beyond specific daytime hours to prevent an adverse effect resulting from theoperation of the Generator Sets. 3. Condition No. 4 is included to ensure that the emissions of nitrogen oxide will not result in anadverse effect at a sensitive receptor. 4. Condition No. 5 is included to emphasize that the Equipment must be maintained and operatedaccording to a procedure that will result in compliance with the EPA, the regulations, and thisApproval. 5. Condition No. 6 is included to provide the minimum performance requirement considered necessaryto prevent an adverse effect resulting from the operation of the Equipment. 6. Condition No. 7 is included to require the Company to keep records and to provide information tostaff of the Ministry so that compliance with the EPA, the regulations, and this Approval can beverified. 7. Condition No. 8 is included to require the Company to notify staff of the Ministry so as to assist theMinistry with the review of the site's compliance. 8. Condition No. 9 is included to provide the minimum performance requirement considered necessaryto prevent an adverse effect resulting from the operation of the Facility. In accordance with Section 139 of the Environmental Protection Act, you may by written Notice servedupon me, the Environmental Review Tribunal and in accordance with Section 47 of the EnvironmentalBill of Rights, 1993 , S.O. 1993, c. 28 (Environmental Bill of Rights), the Environmental Commissioner,within 15 days after receipt of this Notice, require a hearing by the Tribunal. The EnvironmentalCommissioner will place notice of your appeal on the Environmental Registry. Section 142 of theEnvironmental Protection Act provides that the Notice requiring the hearing shall state: 1. The portions of the environmental compliance approval or each term or condition in theenvironmental compliance approval in respect of which the hearing is required, and; 2. The grounds on which you intend to rely at the hearing in relation to each portion appealed. The Notice should also include: 3. The name of the appellant; 4. The address of the appellant; 5. The environmental compliance approval number; 6. The date of the environmental compliance approval; 7. The name of the Director, and; 8. The municipality or municipalities within which the project is to be engaged in. And the Notice should be signed and dated by the appellant. This Notice must be served upon: The Secretary* Environmental ReviewTribunal 655 Bay Street, Suite

AND

The EnvironmentalCommissioner 1075 Bay Street, Suite605

AND

The Director appointed for thepurposes of Part II.1 of theEnvironmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment and

1500 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E5

Toronto, Ontario M5S 2B1

Climate Change 2 St. Clair Avenue West, Floor12A Toronto, Ontario M4V 1L5

* Further information on the Environmental Review Tribunal ’s requirements for an appeal canbe obtained directly from the Tribunal at: Tel: (416) 212-6349, Fax: (416) 314-4506 orwww.ert.gov.on.ca This instrument is subject to Section 38 of the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993, that allows residentsof Ontario to seek leave to appeal the decision on this instrument. Residents of Ontario may seekleave to appeal within 15 days from the date this decision is placed on the Environmental Registry. Byaccessing the Environmental Registry at www.ebr.gov.on.ca , you can determine when the leave toappeal period ends. The above noted activity is approved under s.20.3 of Part II.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.

DATED AT TORONTO this 7th day of August, 2015Gregory Zimmer, P.Eng. Director appointed for the purposes of Part II.1 ofthe Environmental Protection Act

DP/ c: District Manager, MOECC Halton-Peel Emily Lau, Golder Associates Ltd. Terry Harding, Valcoustics Canada Ltd.

Ontario

Ministryof theEnvironment

Ministèredel’Environnement

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVALAIR

NUMBER 9145-5DMTR9

1390958 Ontario Limited2370 Third LineOakville, OntarioL6M 4E2

Site Location: Central Park Lodge2370 Third LineOakville Town, Regional Municipality of HaltonL6M 4E2

You have applied in accordance with Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act for approval of:

- one (1) standby diesel generator set, having a rating of 125 kilowatts, to provide power for the long term care facilityduring emergency situations,

- two (2) natural gas fired boilers for comfort heating purposes, each having a heat input of 1.3 Gigajoules per hour;

all in accordance with the Application for Approval (Air) dated July 16, 2002, and all supporting documentation andinformation, signed by Ania Orlowska (Project Engineer), the Walter Fedy Partnership, agents for 1390958 OntarioLimited.

For the purpose of this Certificate of Approval and the terms and conditions specified below, the following definitionsapply:

(1) "Act" means the Environmental Protection Act;

(2) "Certificate" means this Certificate of Approval issued in accordance with Section 9 of the Act;

(3) "Owner" means the 1390958 Ontario Limited, and includes its successors and assignees;

(4) "Works" means the diesel generator set and boilers described in the Owner's application, this Certificate and in thesupporting documentation submitted with the application, to the extent approved by this Certificate;

(5) "Manual" means a document or a set of documents that provide written instructions to staff of the Owner;

(6) "Ministry" means Ministry of Environment and Energy; and,

(7) "Publication NPC-205" means Ministry Publication NPC-205, Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2Areas (Urban), October, 1995.

You are hereby notified that this approval is issued to you subject to the terms and conditions outlined below:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

GENERAL CONDITION

1.1 Except as otherwise provided by these Conditions, the Owner shall design, build, install, operate and maintain theworks in accordance with the description given in this Certificate, the application for approval of the works and the


submitted supporting documents and plans and specifications as listed in this Certificate.

1.2 Where there is a conflict between a provision of any submitted document referred to in this Certificate and theConditions of this Certificate, the Conditions in this Certificate shall take precedence, and where there is a conflict betweenthe listed submitted documents, the document bearing the most recent date shall prevail.

PERFORMANCE

2. The Owner shall ensure that the noise emissions from the works comply with the limits set out in Publication NPC-205.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

3. The Owner shall restrict the periodic testing of the diesel generator to the daytime hours from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm.

4. The Owner shall ensure that the works are properly operated and maintained at all times. The Owner shall:

(1) prepare, before commencement of operation of the works, and update, as necessary, a Manual outlining the operatingprocedures and a maintenance program for the works, including:

(a) routine operating and maintenance procedures in accordance with good engineering practices and asrecommended by the works suppliers;

(b) emergency procedures;

(c) procedures for any record keeping activities relating to operation and maintenance of the works;

(d) all appropriate measures to minimize noise emissions from all potential sources;

(2) implement the recommendations of the Manual; and

(3) retain, for a minimum of two (2) years from the date of their creation, all records on the maintenance, repair andinspection of the works, and make these records available for review by staff of the Ministry upon request.


1. Condition No. 1 is imposed to ensure that the works are built and operated in the manner in which they were describedfor review and upon which approval was granted. This condition is also included to emphasize the precedence ofConditions in the Certificate and the practice that the Approval is based on the most current document, if severalconflicting documents are submitted for review.

2. Condition No. 2 is included to provide the minimum performance requirement considered necessary to prevent anadverse effect resulting from the operation of the works.

3. Condition No. 3 is included to ensure that the proposed operation, excluding emergency situations, is not extendedbeyond specific daytime hours to prevent an adverse effect resulting from the operation of the diesel generator.

4. Condition No. 4 is included to emphasize that the works must be maintained and operated according to a procedure thatwill result in compliance with the Act, the regulations and this Certificate. In addition the Owner is required to keep recordsand provide information to staff of the Ministry so that compliance with the Act, the regulations and this Certificate can beverified.

In accordance with Section 139 of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E-19, as amended, you may by


written notice served upon me and the Environmental Review Tribunal within 15 days after receipt of this Notice, requirea hearing by the Tribunal. Section 142 of the Environmental Protection Act, provides that the Notice requiring the hearingshall state:

1. The portions of the approval or each term or condition in the approval in respect of which the hearing is required, and;2. The grounds on which you intend to rely at the hearing in relation to each portion appealed.

The Notice should also include:

3. The name of the appellant;4. The address of the appellant;5. The Certificate of Approval number;6. The date of the Certificate of Approval;7. The name of the Director;8. The municipality within which the works are located;

And the Notice should be signed and dated by the appellant.

This Notice must be served upon:

The Secretary*Environmental Review Tribunal2300 Yonge St., 12th FloorP.O. Box 2382Toronto, OntarioM4P 1E4

AND The DirectorSection 9, Environmental Protection ActMinistry of Environment and Energy2 St. Clair Avenue West, Floor 12AToronto, OntarioM4V 1L5

* Further information on the Environmental Review Tribunal’s requirements for an appeal can be obtained directly from the Tribunal at:Tel: (416) 314-4600, Fax: (416) 314-4506 or www.ert.gov.on.ca

The above noted works are approved under Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act.

DATED AT TORONTO this 4th day of September, 2002Aziz Ahmed, P.Eng.DirectorSection 9, Environmental Protection Act

AA/c: District Manager, MOE Halton-PeelAnia Orlowska, The Walter Fedy Partnership


APPENDIX

D ODOUR MEASUREMENTS

Pro

ject

Na

me

: O

ak

vil

le G

ree

n S

en

ior

Liv

ing

D-6

Ass

ess

me

nt

Sit

e N

am

e:

Oa

kv

ille

Gre

en

Se

nio

r Li

vin

g

Sit

e A

dd

ress

: O

ak

vil

le,

On

tari

o

Loca

tio

n

Win

d S

pe

ed

(m

/s)

Win

d

Dir

ect

ion

Tim

e

Od

ou

r

Co

nce

ntr

ati

on

Od

ou

r

De

scri

pti

on

He

do

nic

To

ne

Win

d S

pe

ed

(m/s

)

Win

d

Dir

ect

ion

Tim

e

Od

ou

r

Co

nce

ntr

ati

on

Od

ou

r

De

scri

pti

on

He

do

nic

To

ne

Win

d S

pe

ed

(m/s

)

Win

d

Dir

ect

ion

Tim

e

Od

ou

r

Co

nce

ntr

ati

on

Od

ou

r

De

scri

pti

on

He

do

nic

To

ne

S1

1.2

- 2

.4S

E1

1:3

5N

D-

-1

.2 -

2.4

ES

E1

2:3

2N

D-

-1

.3 -

2.4

SE

13

:00

ND

--

S2

2.5

- 4

.1S

E1

1:4

1N

D-

-1

.4 -

2.4

ES

E1

2:3

4N

D-

-0

.8 -

2.7

SE

13

:02

ND

--

S3

1.2

- 1

.8S

E1

2:0

7N

D-

-1

.5 -

2.6

SE

12

:39

ND

--

0.9

- 1

.4S

E1

3:0

5N

D-

-

S4

0.8

- 1

.5S

E1

2:1

0N

D-

-1

.2 -

1.8

E1

2:4

2N

D-

-0

.6 -

1.2

ES

E1

3:0

7N

D-

-

S5

0.8

- 1

.5S

E1

2:1

4N

D-

-1

.6 -

2.2

ES

E1

2:4

4N

D-

-0

.8 -

1.4

SE

13

:10

ND

--

S6

0.6

- 1

.2S

E1

2:1

6<

2D

iese

l e

mis

sio

ns,

con

stru

ctio

n e

qu

ipm

en

t-1

1.3

- 1

.8S

E1

2:4

6N

D-

-0

.6 -

1.3

SE

13

:11

ND

--

S7

0.4

- 1

.6S

E1

2:2

1N

D-

-1

.2 -

2.3

SE

12

:49

ND

--

1.4

- 2

.4S

E1

3:1

4N

D-

-

S8

1.5

- 2

.2E

12

:26

<2

Fa

int

foo

d o

do

ur

(Lit

tle

Ce

asa

rs)

01

.4 -

1.8

ES

E1

2:5

5N

D-

-1

.2 -

2.4

ES

E1

3:1

8N

D-

-

Loca

tio

n

Win

d

Dir

ect

ion

Od

ou

r

Co

nce

ntr

ati

on

Od

ou

r

De

scri

pti

on

He

do

nic

To

ne

S1

SE

ND

--

S2

SE

ND

--

S3

SE

ND

--

S4

ES

EN

D-

-

S5

SE

ND

--

S6

SE

ND

--

S7

SE

ND

--

S8

ES

EN

D-

-

Av

era

ge

fo

r 3

Ro

un

ds

of

Od

ou

r S

am

pli

ng

oakville green health sciences and technology … planning/da... · wsp canada inc. (wsp) was...

Documents