nutritional interest of cheese fat a lot of new datas...laboratoire de biochimie et nutrition...
TRANSCRIPT
Laboratoire de Biochimie et Nutrition HumaineAGROCAMPUS - INRA, Rennes, FRANCE
NUTRITIONAL INTEREST OF CHEESE FAT
A lot of new datas
METABOLISM AND FUNCTIONS OFSATURATED FATTY ACIDS
Pr. Philippe LEGRAND
Montreal, August 2011
SATURATED FATTY ACIDS
- We make them
- We eat them
- Metabolism
- Important specific functions
- Problems with CVD and MS biomarkers
Saturated fatty acids« We do synthesize them» : (human, animals, plants…)
Sugars, starch, alcohol……….
Palmitic acid
18:0
16:0
Stearic acid
synthesis
elongation
In addition,mammary gland synthesizes the short and middle chain saturates (C4-C10), plus lauric (C12) and myristic acid (C14)
Sugars, starch…..
Palmitic acid 16:0
Mammary gland
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
SATURATED FATTY ACIDS
- We make them
- We eat them
- Metabolism
- Important specific functions
- Problems with CVD and MS biomarkers
CONSUMPTION IN FRANCE
Men Women Total
Lipids (g/day) 103,0 81,6 91,8
Lipids (%Energy) 38,8 39,8 39,3
Saturated Fatty Acids (%En) 15,8 15,9 15,9
AET : Apport énergétique total
Source: INCA 2
SATURATED FATTY ACIDS
- We make them
- We eat them
- Metabolism
- Important specific functions
- Problems with CVD and MS biomarkers
Intestine
Long chain fatty acids
Short and middle chain fatty acids Portal vein
Chylomicrons
Lymph
MuscleAdipose
Circulation
Comparative absorption of saturated fatty acids
STORAGE
CATABOLISM(β-oxidation)
Liver
Myristic / Palmitic acid metabolism
Secretion
HEPATOCYTEC14:0
Uptake Incorporation into lipids
β-oxidation
Desaturation
Acylation of proteins (myristoylation)Biosynthesis
C14:0
Gene regulation ?
Elongation
Rioux et al. (2000) , Rioux et al. (2002), Legrand et al. (2002), Rioux et al. (2003), Jan et al. (2004), Rioux et al. (2005), Rioux et al. (2006), Rioux et al. (2007), Rioux et al. (2008),
METABOLISM
Ø Short and middle chain SFA have a specific and « safe » metabolism, Ø Myristic acid and palmitic acid have not the same metabolic fate in
the cell :Ø Myristic acid is rapidly β-oxidized, weakly secreted in the form of TG-
VLDL, but strongly elongated into palmitic acid. No accumulation !Ø Palmitic acid is stored and secreted in the form of TG, weakly
elongated into stearic acid. Also main product of de novolipogenesis, palmitic acid accumulates in the cell !
Ø Stearic acid is less synthesized (than palmitic), actively desaturated into oleic acid. No accumulation !
SATURATED FATTY ACIDS
- We make them
- We eat them
- Metabolism
- Important specific functions
- Problems with CVD and MS biomarkers
Saturated fatty acids functions (in addition to energetical function)
C4 butyric
C6 caproïc
C8 caprylic
C10 capric
C12 lauric
C14 myristic
C16 palmitic
C18 stearic
C20 arachidic
C22 behenic
C24 lignoceric
- Inhibition of tumor proliferation in vivo and in vitro- Induction of apoptosis- Colon and smooth muscle cells- Less fat deposition - C8 ê VLDL secretion (inhibition of apo B synthesis)- Hypocholesterolemic effect (C8, C10)- Antiviral role
- Specific acylation of proteins
- Activation of conversion from C18:3 n-3 towards EPA + DHA
- Activation of sphingolipids synthesis
Saturated fatty acids functions (in addition to energetical function)
C4 butyric
C6 caproïc
C8 caprylic
C10 capric
C12 lauric
C14 myristic
C16 palmitic
C18 stearic
C20 arachidic
C22 behenic
C24 lignoceric
- Active desaturation to oleic acid
- Nervous structure (myelinisation)
- Componant of sphingolipids
- « non specific » acylation of some proteins
- Low elongation et β-oxidation 1 / 3 of phospholipids fatty acids : structural role
SATURATED FATTY ACIDS
- We make them
- We eat them
- Metabolism
- Important specific functions
- Problems with CVD and MS biomarkers
Saturated fatty acids functionsProblems ?
C4 butyric
C6 caproïc
C8 caprylic
C10 capric
C12 lauric
C14 myristic
C16 palmitic
C18 stearic
C20 arachidic
C22 behenic
C24 lignoceric
Problem with the CVD risk :Deleterious effects …. in case of excess
Accumulation of palmitic acid : endogenous + exogenous origins
- No problem with the CVD risk !
- No problem with the CVD risk !
Saturated fatty acids and health
At the beginning : association with CHD risk
Keys 1966, Kato 1973
But : ecological studies (7 countries study)
NEVER CONFIRMED BY COHORT STUDIES
Epidemiological studies (cohorts)Then
Garcia 1980
Mc Gee 1984
Esrey 1996
Boniface 2002
Jakobsen 2004
Xu 2006
Gillman 1997
Mozzafarian 2004
Jakobsen 2009
Yamagashi 2009
Jakobsen 2010 (MI)
Shekelle 1981
Kushi 1985
Posner 1991
Ascherio 1996
Pietinen 1997
Tucke 2005
Leosdottir 2007
Neutral
Association between SFA and CVD risk :
Meta-analysis (Siri-Tarino 2010) : 21 cohorts”Overall, despite the conventional wisdom that reduced dietary saturated fatintake is beneficial for CVD health, there is no significant evidence for concludingthat dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD”
For dairy products specifically, see works by Elwood et al : no risk association
Recent Intervention studies on SFA More
Lipgene study : a european randomized dietary intervention study on SFA
No effect of reducing SFA (16% to 8%) on parameters of metabolic syndrome (insulin sensitivity, blood pressure), inflammation, LDL-C…
Diets including dairy products (full-fat vs low-fat), 12 weeks.
Tierney et al, 2011
The RISK trial : replacement of SFAs by MUFAs or Carbohydrates
No favorable effects on insulin sensitivity, reduction of TC/HDL-C ratio
No dairy products included inthe intervention
Jebb et al, 2010
Dairy products study : beneficial effects of dairy products ?
No effect (but no adverse effect !!), except positive effect on waist circumference despite higher energy intake (related to the presence of short chain FA ?)
Diets with 3-5 portions of dairy products (cheese), 6 months
Wennersberg et al, 2009
Which saturated fatty acids ?
Stearic acid (C18:0)
§ Neutral on cholesterolemia Yu 1995, Kelly 2001, Mensink 2005, Huster 2010 (review)
§ Neutral on arterial diameter Mozzafarian 2004
§ Not thrombogenic Sanders 2001, Tholstrup 2003, Thijssen 2005
NO PROBLEM
Which saturated fatty acids ?
Short and middle chain fatty acids(C4- C10)
32% energy C8 - C10
Cholesterolemia
§ Non hypercholesterolemic Keys 1957Hashi 1960 (lowering effect)Hegsted 1965Keys 1965Wardlaw 1995 (RCT), 6% energy C8-C10Temme 1997 (RCT), 10% energy C6-C8-C10 (myristic, oleic)
§ HypercholesterolemicMc Candy 1970Swift 1992Cater 1997Tholstrup 2004 53% fat, 43% sat !
45% fat, 70% sat !
CHD risk : NO RISKHu et al., 1999 (Nurse Health Study)
Body weight, Fat mass, Waist circumference, TG : Favorable or neutralTsuji 2001, Nosaka 2003, Kasai 2003, St Onge 2003, Zhang 2010,
No reason for considering SFA “en bloc” anymore,
- in term of structure and metabolism,
- in term of functions
- in term of deleterious effect as well.
CONCLUSION, Take Home Messages
CONCLUSION, Take Home Messages
No reason for considering SFA “en bloc” anymore, in term of structure and metabolism, in term of functions and in term of deleterious effect as well.
- Need of more precise epidemiological studies (different saturated fatty acids, dose-effects approach, controls…) for evaluating the levels and sources where C12, C14, C16 FA are deleterious
- Time for “up to date” recommendations without caricatural old statements of toxicity or eviction……..
……….. So, we did it in France throw the
recommandations of the food safety agency (ANSES)
MINIMAL PHYSIOLOGICALREQUIREMENT
ANC
Total lipids 30 35 - 40
Essential FA
C18:2 n-6 2 4
C18:3 n-3 0,8 1
DHA (C22:6 n-3) 250 mg 250 mg
Non essential FA
EPA (C20:5 n-3) - 250 mg
Lauric acid (C12:0) + Myristic acid (C14:0) +Palmitic acid (C16:0)
- ≤ 8
Total saturated fatty acids - ≤ 12Oleic acid (C18:1 n-9) - 15 - 20
Other non essential fatty acids - -
Adequate Intake (ANC :Apport Nutritionnel Conseillé)Values expressed in % of total energy intake except for DHA and EPA (in mg)
for an adult (at 2000 kcal/day)
DAIRY SFAs / other sources of SFAs
- Dairy products account for 34% total SFA (only !!!) (France)
- SFA from dairy sources have an interesting composition (13% short
and middle chain)
- SFA from plant origin have a poor composition (long chain)
- SFA from plant origin are less « visible » and cheaper
- The health concern is the excess of C12, C14, C16
C4 butyric
C6 caproic
C8 caprylic
C10 capric
C12 lauric 3,5 %
C14 myristic 10 %
C16 palmitic 23-32 % 46-62 %*.... *
C18 stéaric 13 % 6 %.... *
Dairy SFAs « plant SFAs » ( from palm oil mainly)
13-15 %
SFA qualitative value + + + - - - *
SFA content : 52-70% 52……100%
* Worst if hydrogenation
COMPARATIVE COMPOSITION OF SFA
IF THE TOTAL SFA INTAKE SHOULD BE REDUCED, OR MORE SERIOUSLY IF THE ATHEROGENIC (when in excess) SFA SHOULD BE REDUCED
THEN :
1) CONSIDER THE DAIRY / PLANT ORIGIN OF SFA.
2) DAIRY PRODUCTS ARE NOT THE GOOD TARGET QUALITATIVELY
3) DAIRY PRODUCTS ARE NOT THE UNIC TARGET QUANTITATIVELY
CONCLUSION FOR DAIRY SOURCES OF SFA
Thanks for your attention