nutritional aspects of palm oil an update% calories 3.5 – 7 7.1 – 8.6 8.7 -10.5 10.6 – 16.0...

36
Nutritional Aspects of Palm Oil An Update Pramod Khosla, PhD Associate Professor, Dept. of Nutrition & Food Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202 E:mail [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Nutritional Aspects of Palm Oil – An Update

    Pramod Khosla, PhD

    Associate Professor,

    Dept. of Nutrition & Food Science,

    Wayne State University,

    Detroit, MI 48202

    E:mail [email protected]

  • Dietary Fatty Acids and CHD: Summary of the Evidence

    Fatal CHD CHD events

    Total Fat C-NR C-NR

    TFA P C

    SFA/CHO P-NR P-NR

    MUFA/SFA

    PUFA/SFA C C

    Linoleic acid

    Alpha Linolenic

    n3 LCPUFA P C

    Skeaff and Miller , (2009) Ann. Nutr. Metab. 55: 173-201

  • RISK FACTORS FOR CHD

    Gender

    Increasing age

    Genetics: Family history of CHD

    High TC, LDL-C

    Low HDL-C

    Smoking

    Diabetes

    Obesity

    DIET

    Risk calculator

    Fat quality

    Protein quality

    Fiber

    Antioxidants

    Phytochemicals

    Carbohydrate type

    Alcohol

    http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/index.htmhttp://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp?usertype=profhttp://hp2010.nhlbihin.net/atpiii/calculator.asp?usertype=prof

  • Dietary fat composition: by fatty acid classes

    Fatty Acid Classes ,%

    SFA

    AAD 34%en 15:12:7 P/S 0.4

    Coco PKO MilkF CoButt Tallow Pstear Palm POlein Lard Chick Olive hiOsun Canola Soyb Corn Saff

    TFA

    MUFA

    PUFA

    PUFA MUFA SFA

  • Evolution of regression equations predicting the effects of dietary fatty acid classes on serum cholesterol ______________________________________________________________________ Eqn 1 : ∆SC = 2.74∆S - 1.31∆P (Keys et. al., 1957) ∆SC = 2.40∆S - 1.20∆P + 1.5∆C1/2 (Keys et. al., 1965) Eqn 2 : ∆SC = 2.16∆S - 1.65∆P + 0.065∆C (Hegsted et. al., 1965) ∆SC = 2.74∆S - 1.83∆P + 0.071∆C Eqn 3 : ∆SC = 2.16∆S - 0.12∆Mb - 0.60∆P (Mensink & Katan, 1992) Eqn 4 : ∆SC = 2.10∆S - 1.16∆P + 0.067∆C (Hegsted et. al., 1993) Eqn 5 : ∆SC = 2.02∆S - 0.48∆M - 0.96∆P (Yu et. al., 1995) Eqn 6 : ∆SC = 1.90∆S - 0.90∆P + 0.021∆C (Howell et. al., 1997) ______________________________________________________________________ ∆SC denotes the change in serum cholesterol in mg/dL, ∆S denotes changes in %en for all the SFA, ∆S denotes changes in %en for the 12-16 carbon SFA

    ..but serum cholesterol masks underlying differences in lipoprotein cholesterol

    Lipoprotein cholesterol comprises cholesterol in LDL and HDL

    Increased LDL-C a risk factor

    While increased HDL-C is protective

    Ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C or TC/HDL-C far better predictor

  • Threshold hypothesis

    14:0 and 18:2 key factors

    14:0 raises TC (linear), 18:2 lowers TC (non-linear)

    Threshold level of 18:2 (5-6% en?)

    16:0 becomes important as LDLr activity decreased (Hayes & Khosla, (1992), FASEB J., 6, 2600-2607)

    More extensive analyses in gerbils (>50 diets)

    Confirmed 14:0 and 18:2 key factors

    Threshold level of 18:2 (4-5% en?)

    16:0 cholesterolemic with increasing depression of LDL receptors

    (Pronczuk, Khosla & Hayes, (1994), FASEB J., 8, 1191-1200)

    Similar story in hamsters (Hayes, Pronczuk & Khosla, (1995), J. Nutr. Biochem., 6, 188-194)

    Problem –is not the presence of SFA per se – rather it is the absence of PUFA

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    LDL

    S

    cM

    P

    tM

    So what are the effects of fatty acids classes on lipoprotein cholesterol?

  • -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    LDL

    S

    cM

    P

    tM

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    HDL

    S

    cM

    P

    tM

    -0.04-0.02

    00.020.04

    TC/HDL

    S

    cM

    P

    tM

    Changes shown in mmol/L for LDL and HDL. Adapted from Mensink et al Am J Clin Nutr (2003) 77: 1146-1155

    MUFA & PUFA best. Trans worse than SFA

    So what are the effects of fatty acids classes on lipoprotein cholesterol?

  • Dietary fats comprised of individual fatty acids – especially important for SFA

    Fatty Acid Classes

    16:0

    AAD 34%en 15:12:7 P/S 0.4

    Coco PKO MilkF CoaBut Tallow Pstear Palm pOle Lard Chick Olive hiOsun Canola Soyb Corn Saff

    18:0

    C18:1

    18:2

    18:3

    t18:1

    10:0 6:0+ 8:0

    12:0

    14:0

    16:1

    10/25

  • Effects of individual SFA on lipoprotein cholesterol

    -0.020

    0.020.040.06

    LDL

    L

    M

    P

    S

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    HDL

    L

    M

    P

    S

    -0.04

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    TC/HDL

    L

    M

    P

    S

    Changes shown in mmol/L for LDL and HDL. Adapted from Mensink et al Am J Clin Nutr (2003) 77: 1146-1155

    14:0, 16:0 no effect 18:0, 12:0 beneficial

  • So what about trans fatty acids?

    •Unsaturated fatty acids - at least one trans double bond

    •Partial hydrogenation of polyunsaturated oils - isomerization and migration of double bonds - distribution of cis and trans double bonds (margarines, shortenings, salad & cooking oils)

    •Partial hydrogenationtFA. Full hydrogenation SFA •Major tFA - elaidic acid (t9 - 18:1) •Dairy and meats have t9 - 16:1 and t11 - 18:1 (vaccenic acid)

  • TC/HDL-C was adversely affected by the trans diet

    a

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    TransPalmitate

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    % t

    ran

    sfer (

    c.f

    . con

    trol)

    16:0 Trans

    p = 0.03

    Khosla et al, (1997)

    trans lowered HDL-C

    trans increased TC/ HDL-C ratio

    trans increased CETP

  • Dietary Fat intake and Risk of CHD and Type II Diabetes (TIID) in Women

    CHD data - Hu et al, (1997) N Engl J Med, 337: 1491-1499

    Type II Diabetes data - Salmeron et al, (2001) Am J Clin Nutr 73: 1019-1026

    Effects of replacing 5%en from carbohydrates with specific fatty acids

    Effects of replacing 2%en from carbohydrates with trans fatty acids

  • -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    SFA MUFA PUFA tFA

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    from Oh et al (2005) Am J Epidemiol, 161: 672-679

    1.6 to 2.8% en 4.1 to 7.4% en 12 to 18% en

    Relative risk of CHD based on quintiles of dietary fatty acid intake (Multivariate analyses) 20 year follow-up data from the Nurses Health Study

    Beneficial effects with PUFA

    Adverse effects with tFA

  • -40%

    -30%

    -20%

    -10%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    LDL1 LDL2 LDL3 LDL4

    Sf (flotation rate) 7 - 12 5 - 7 3 - 5 0-5

    Dreon et al (1984) Am J Clin Nutr, 67: 828-836

    Changes in LDL subfraction mass. Low high fat diets (24% cal 45% cal: SFA 6% cal 18% cal)

  • -12%

    -10%

    -8%

    -6%

    -4%

    -2%

    0%

    2%

    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

    % Calories 3.5 – 7 7.1 – 8.6 8.7 -10.5 10.6 – 16.0

    Mozaffarian et al, (2004) Am J Clin Nutr, 80: 1175-1184-1499

    Saturated fat intake and Changes in mean minimal Coronary Arterial Diameter in post-menopausal women

    Mozaedit.pdf

  • SFA lower Lp(a) concentrations ?

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26Oleic

    Mod Trans

    High Trans

    Sat

    All subjects

    mg/d

    L

    abc

    Clevidence et al, (1997) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17, 1657-1661,

    n=58

    a b

    c

  • If SFA decreased – what should be the replacement?

    • Pooled analysis of 11 studies. 4-10 year follow-up

    • Pooled RR evaluated in 344, 696 subjects (5, 249 coronary events , 2155 coronary deaths)

    • Risk of coronary events decreased when 5% energy from SFA replaced with PUFA not MUFA or carbohydrates

    Jakobsen et al , (2009) Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1425 - 1432

  • Additional meta-analysis showed no significant evidence for concluding SFA increase CHD risk

    • 5-23 year follow-up

    • Pooled RR evaluated in 347, 747 subjects (11, 006 developed CHD or stroke)

    • Pooled RR for CHD – 1.07 (p=0.22)

    • Pooled RR for Stroke – 0.81 (p=0.11)

    • Pooled RR for CVD – 1.00 (p=0.89)

    Siri-Tarino et al , (2010 ) Am J Clin Nutr 91: 535 - 546

  • Micha and Mozaffarian , (2010 ) Lipids 45: 893-905

  • Micha and Mozaffarian , (2010 ) Lipids 45: 893-905

  • Effect of Fatty Acids on CVD: Weight of the

    Evidence

    D. Mozaffarian, MD, DrPH

    10/14/10

    Fish n-3 PUFA Plant n-3 PUFA Plant n-6 PUFA MUFA

    Saturated Fat

    Refined CHO

    Trans Fat - Industrial

    Benefit

    Harm

  • Alternatives to trans ….

    • Animal fats?

    • Interesterified fats with high stearic acid?

    • Genetically engineered oil crops?

    • Other sources of SFA – palm oil ! !

  • Dietary fats comprised of individual fatty acids – especially important for SFA

    Fatty Acid Classes

    16:0

    AAD 34%en 15:12:7 P/S 0.4

    Coco PKO MilkF CoaBut Tallow Pstear Palm pOle Lard Chick Olive hiOsun Canola Soyb Corn Saff

    18:0

    C18:1

    18:2

    18:3

    t18:1

    10:0 6:0+ 8:0

    12:0

    14:0

    16:1

    10/25

  • Dietary fats comprised of individual fatty acids – especially important for SFA

    Fatty Acid Classes

    16:0

    AAD 34%en 15:12:7 P/S 0.4

    Coco PKO MilkF CoaBut Tallow Pstear Palm pOle Lard Chick Olive hiOsun Canola Soyb Corn FHSBO

    18:0

    C18:1

    18:2

    18:3

    t18:1

    10:0 6:0+ 8:0

    12:0

    14:0

    16:1

  • 7

    5

    4-5

    4 - 6

    4 – 5

    4 - 5

    20 – 30

    80 – 90

    55 - 75

    60 – 70

    5 – 9

    15 - 35

  • Moderator Dennis Bier, M.D.

    Professor of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine Participants

    Margo A. Denke, M.D. Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio

    Joseph Judd, Ph. D. Former Research Leader, Diet and Human Performance Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition

    Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service Richard O’Brien

    Industry Consultant, Author, “Fats and Oils Formulating and Processing for Applications” Fran Seligson, Ph. D.

    Independent consultant and Associate Professor in the Nutrition Department at Penn State Howard Weintraub, M.D.

    Co-Clinical Director, Lipid Treatment and Research Center, New York University Medical Center, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine

    Trans Fat Replacement Roundtable Statements tcm 8 3649.pdf

  • 0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    35.0

    Soybean

    oil

    Palm oil Rapeseed

    oil

    Sunflower

    oil

    Animal

    Fats

    Laurics Others

    33.3 33.5

    16.0

    9.7

    23.3

    7.0

    16.6

    millio

    n to

    nn

    es

    Soybean

    40%

    Palm

    4%

    Rapeseed

    12%Sunflower

    10%

    Coconut

    4%

    Others

    30%

    Total Area

    Soybean29%

    Palm 29%

    Rapeseed14%

    Sunflower8%

    Laurics6%

    Others14%

    Total Vegetable Oil Output

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    SBOSunflO RapSO Palm

    Tonnes/hectare/year

    Soybean oil18%

    Palm oil52%

    Rapeseed oil3%

    Sunflower oil8%

    Animal Fats7%

    Laurics8%

    Others4%

    Global Exports

    Others

    Taiwan

    Nigeria

    Russia

    South Korea

    South Africa

    Turkey

    Japan

    Mexico

    Bangladesh

    Iran

    Pakistan

    N Africa

    India

    EU-27

    China PR

    -20,000 -10,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000

    Net Importers

    Net Exporters (x

    100

    0

    ton

    nes

    ) Source: Oil World

    Malaysia

  • “Vitamin A” activity of red palm oilc RE

    Per 100 g

    Relative quality

    (Times

  • …studies have adopted different methods to provide Vitamin A naturally

    Children fed traditional Indian sweets made with redPO

    School children fed biscuits baked with redPO

    School children given 5 – 10 mL redPO daily

    Cooking green leafy vegetables in redPO

    Also Vitamin A status improved by feeding redPO to pregnant mothers at various stages of pregnancy.

    Also lactating mothers

    Numerous human studies showing efficacy of red palm oil in fighting Vitamin A deficiency

    RPO.pdf

  • Comparison of Vitamin E Content of red palm oil & other Vegetable Oils

    Oil Tocopherols(ppm)

    αT βT γT δT

    Tocotrienols(ppm)

    αT3 βT3 γT3 δT3

    Ppm

    T+T3

    Red Palm Oil 152 - - - 205 - 439 94 890

    Soyabean 101 - 593 264 985

    Cornoil 112 50 602 18 782

    Groundnut 130 - 216 21 367

    Safflower 387 - 174 240 801

    Sunflower 487 - 51 8 546

    Numerous in vitro studies showing efficacy of tocotrienols in inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation and decreasing neurodegeneration

    F:/Slides/Meetings/Cargill2007/Sylvester.pdfSylvester.pdfF:/Slides/Meetings/Cargill2007/JBCfigs.pptJBCfigs.ppt

  • • Variety of carotenoids (Vitamin A)

    • Vitamin E (tocopherols and tocotrienols)

    • …….. Fatty acid composition – replacement for trans Fatty acids

    • So what about effects on chronic disease risk

    Nutritional attributes of Palm Oil and Palm Olein

    FATCHD.ppt

  • Palm Olein and MUFA-rich Oils exert similar effects on the ratio of Total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) in human subjects

  • How much palm oil? Conservative approach -- based on current recommendations for restricting SFA -- can calculate the amount of palm oil in a prudent diet that satisfies various dietary guidelines

    Khosla (2006) J Agro Food Ind. 17: 21-23 Hayes and Khosla, Eur J Lipid Sci Tech (2007) 109: 453-464

  • How would this affect CHD risk?

    Has been calculated that based on

    1) Changes in plasma lipoproteins, replacing 2%calories from trans FA with saturated fatty acids… would decrease risk by 4%

    2) Changes in additional parameters for CHD, besides lipoproteins, replacing 2% calories from trans FA with saturated fatty acids… would decrease risk by 17%

    MandW.pdfMandW.pdfMandW.pdf

  • ……. practical aspects

    SFA vs tFA– not a realistic comparison

    Look at specific fats/oils replacing

    PHVO containing tFA

    CHD risk based not just on changes

    in plasma lipoproteins.

    Report of Mozaffarian and Clarke (2009)

    is of interest

    Also risk assessment papers

    (Barraj et al 2008, Mente et al 2009)

    MozaClark.pdfRA1.pdfMente.pdf

  • Summary

    Fat Quality is more important than fat quantity

    Consensus on transFA and n3 PUFA effects

    Trans FA replacement with SFA, CHD risk improves. Further improvement with MUFA and PUFA

    Saturated fatty acids per se – need to rethink

    Palm Oil – serves a multitude of nutritional needs

    Supply of palm oil makes it the important player globally

    Fatty acid profile of palm eliminates need for hydrogenation

    Minor components help alleviate micronutrient deficiencies using food-based approach

    For more details: J. Am. Coll. Nutr. (2010), 29 (3S) 237-340

    Department of Nutrition.pdfAIntros.pdfAIntros.pdfAIntros.pdf