nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion heidi wengreen, r.d., ph.d., assistant...

69
Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University [email protected]

Upload: ezra-bates

Post on 30-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion

Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D.,

Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University

[email protected]

Page 2: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Objectives

• Part I: Guidelines and tools for the critical interpretation of nutrition “news”

• Part II: Current topics of controversy/confusion

• Part III: Probiotics self discovery

Page 3: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Top 3 sources of consumer information

Page 4: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Common forms of inaccuracy in Media reports on nutrition information:

1. Reporting a correlation as a causation.

2. Generalizing a study’s results to a broader

population, not represented by the study.

3. Exaggerating the size of an effect.

4. Using a single link in a chain of events to make

predictions and events in the future.

Page 5: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Terminology

• Meta-analysis• Randomized, controlled, double-blind

study – “gold-standard”• Prospective cohort study• Case-control study• Cross-sectional study• Case-study• Phase1 study

Page 6: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Questions to ask about a research report (American Dietetic Association position paper):

Page 7: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Things to remember…

• The latest study isn’t the greatest study

• Don’t just look at the “bricks”, look at the whole “house”

Page 8: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Can’t see the forest for the trees…

Fruit Juice Consumption Not Related To Overweight In Children, Study Suggests

(May 23, 2008) — Despite studies that assert otherwise, 100% fruit juice consumption is not related to overweight in children, according to a new ..

Study Shows Fruit Juice/Drink Link To Children's Weight Gain

(Mar. 29, 2007) — Australian schoolchildren who drink fruit juices and fruit drinks are more likely to be overweight or obese than those who don't, Deakin researchers have ..

Page 9: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• Read the following news story with a critical eye.

“Good news for the summer:

Beta-carotene helps to protect

against sunburn” (June 3, 2008,

PRNewswire)

• Be prepared to discuss your impressions.

Page 10: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Find the source of the information:

• Use the media as a way to know WHAT is being talked about but don’t draw conclusions from media or “popular” reports, always go to the ORIGINAL SOURCE – usually a report of the study in a peer-reviewed journal.

Page 11: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Heidi’s favorites nutrition news sites:

• NutraIngredients

http://www.nutraingredients.com/

• Science Daily

http://www.sciencedaily.com/

Page 12: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Scholarly vs. Popular magazines

• Scholarly journals – present new, previously un-published research that includes bibliography, author’s name and academic credentials. Articles go through a peer review process before publication.

• Popular magazines – articles are written by staff writers (not experts), are often geared towards a general audience, and are not peer reviewed before publication.

Page 13: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

List of high impact peer-reviewed journals in nutrition

• Journal of the American Dietetic Association• American Journal of Clinical Nutrition• Journal of Nutrition• Journal of the American Medical Association• Nutrition Reviews• Annals of Nutrition• Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging• Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior• International Journal of Obesity

Page 14: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu
Page 15: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Refining a pubmed search

• Use limits effectively

• Use the related article link

• Use MeSH Terms

• Automatic search updates using My NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information)

Page 16: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• Conduct a pubmed search on beta-carotene and sunburn

• Can you find the original publication from the news-report you reviewed on this topic?

• Have other research papers been published on this topic?

Page 17: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible sources of nutrition information on the internet

• Professional health organizations

• Government health agencies

• Volunteer health agencies

• Consumer groups

Page 18: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible: Professional Health Organizations

• American Dietetic Association: www.eatright.org/ncnd.html

• Society for Nutrition Education:

www.sne.org

• American Medical Association

www.ama-assn.org

• Federation of

Page 19: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible: Government health agencies

• Federal Trade Commissionwww.ftc.gov

• The U.S. Department of Heatlh and Human Services (DHHS)www.os.dhhs.gov

• The Food and Drug Administrationwww.fda.gov

• The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)www.usda.gov

• National Institute of Health’s Office of Dietary Supplementshttp://ods.od.nih.gov/

Page 20: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible: Volunteer health agencies

• American Cancer Societyhttp://www.cancer.org/

• American Alzheimer’s Associationhttp://www.alz.org/

• American Diabetes associationhttp://www.diabetes.org

• American Heart Associationhttp://www.americanheart.org

Page 21: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible: Reputable consumer groups

• The Better Business Bureau

www.bbb.org• The Consumers Union

www.consumersunion.org• The American Council on Science and Health

www.acsh.org• National Council Against Health Fraud

www.ncahf.org

Page 22: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Credible: Universities

• Utah State University Extension

http://extension.usu.edu/

Page 23: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Questions to ask to assess the credibility of Web sites (ADA position paper):

Page 24: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• Critically review the following website

• DSM nutritional products

http://www.dsm.com/en_US/html/dnp/home_dnp.htm

• Be prepared to share your impressions

Page 25: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Current topics of controversy or confusion in nutrition

• Vitamin D – how much do I need?

• Whole grains – what are they?

• Supplements – to take or not to take?

• Glycemic index – useful tool?

• Probiotics – bacteria for breakfast?

Page 26: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Vitamin D

Page 27: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

* Current DRI (AI) for vitamin D for infants through adults age 50 is 200 IU/day. The current UL (upper limit) is 2000 IU.

Page 28: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Vitamin D Insufficiency May Be Present In Pediatric Patients With Low Bone Density• June 2, 2008 — Vitamin D insufficiency is common in adults and is emerging in

the world of pediatrics. A mild degree of vitamin D deficiency, also known as vitamin D insufficiency, causes rickets in children and .

Low Vitamin D Levels Appear Common In Healthy Children• June 2, 2008 — Many healthy infants and toddlers may have low levels of vitamin

D, and about one-third of those appear to have some evidence of reduced bone mineral content on X-rays, according to a new .

Current Vitamin D Recommendations Fraction Of Safe, Perhaps Essential Levels For Children• May 28, 2008 — The current recommended daily allowance of vitamin D for

children is 200 International Units, but new research reveals that children may need and can safely take ten-times that amount. According to a .

No Association Found Between Vitamin D Concentration In Blood And Risk Of Prostate Cancer• May 27, 2008 — High vitamin D concentration in the blood is not associated with a

reduced risk of prostate cancer, researchers report in a new article. Laboratory studies suggested that high doses of vitamin D may .

Extra Vitamin D In Early Childhood Cuts Adult Diabetes Risk• March 13, 2008 — Vitamin D supplements in early childhood may ward off the

development of type 1 diabetes in later life, reveals new research. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disorder, in which insulin producing

Page 30: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• Age • Dark skin –

melanonin• Sunscreen• Time of day• Season of year• Latitude of location

Page 31: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

How much sun exposure?

• 1 MED dose of UVB radiation (enough to cause a mild sunburn) = 10,000 – 20,000 IU Vit D

• Caution: melanoma, wrinkles?• Suncreen decreases Vit D production by 95%• Recommendation: unprotected sun exposure on

arms, neck, face for 5-15 minutes between the hours of 1-5 pm during the spring, summer, and fall on most days for lighter skinned individuals is enough. After that time, apply sunscreen.

Page 34: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Points to remember

• You can’t get enough vitamin D from food alone.• If you aren’t in the sun, or if don’t effectively

make Vit D when in the sun, you need a supplement (vitamin D3 cholecalciferol).

• Most experts agree a dose of 2000 IU is save and prudent for most.

• The only way to know your vitamin D status, is to have your physician check your 25 OH D2 (25 hydroxyvitamin D) levels.

Page 35: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Whole-grains

Page 36: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

http://www.wholegrainscouncil.org/

Page 37: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Definition: Whole grains

• Whole grains or foods made from them contain all the essential parts and naturally-occurring nutrients of the entire grain seed. If the grain has been processed (e.g., cracked, crushed, rolled, extruded, and/or cooked), the food product should deliver approximately the same rich balance of nutrients that are found in the original grain seed.

Page 38: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_grain

• Whole grains are cereal grains that retain the bran and germ as well as the endosperm, in contrast to refined grains, which retain only the endosperm. Whole-meal products are made from whole-grain flour.

• Common whole-grain products include oatmeal, popcorn, brown rice, whole-wheat flour, sprouted grains, and whole-wheat bread. Common refined-grain products include white rice, white bread, hominy, and pasta (although whole-grain varieties of pasta are available).

Page 39: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

List of whole grains• Amaranth• Barley• Buckwheat• Corn, including whole cornmeal

and popcorn• Millet• Oats, including oatmeal• Rice, both brown rice and colored

rice• Rye• Sorghum (also called milo)• Wheat, including varieties such as

spelt, emmer, farro, einkorn, Kamut®, durum and forms such as bulgur, cracked wheat and wheatberries

• Wild rice

Page 40: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Why whole-grains?

Page 41: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Although it is difficult to separate the protectiveproperties of whole grains from dietary fiber and other components, the disease protectionseen from whole grains in prospective epidemiological studies far exceeds the protectionfrom isolated nutrients and phytochemicals in whole grains.

Page 42: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• High in fiber SCFA in gut

• High in vitamins and minerals

• High in antioxidants

• High in other phytochemicals with known protective properties

• Lower Glycemic Index mediates insulin response

Page 43: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

How much do you need?

• The Dietary Guidelines for Americans, released in January 2005, recommend that all adults eat at least half their grains as whole grains – that's at least 3 to 5 servings of whole grains.

• MyPyramid emphasizes whole grains

Page 44: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

What’s a serving?

• 16 grams of whole grains = 1 serving– 1 slice 100% whole grain break– ½ cup brown rice– 1 cup 1005 whole grain ready to eat cereal

• Every product with the Whole Grain Stamp contains at least half a serving (8g) of whole grains.

Page 45: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

What you may see on the ingredients label

What it means

whole grain [name of grain]

whole wheat

whole [other grain]

stoneground whole [grain]

brown rice

oats, oatmeal (including old-fashioned oatmeal, instant oatmeal)

wheatberries

YES -- Contains all parts of the grain, so you're getting all the nutrients of the whole grain.

wheat flour

semolina

durum wheat

organic flour

multigrain (may describe several whole grains or several refined grains, or a mix of both)

MAYBE -- These words are accurate descriptions of the package contents, but because some parts of the grain MAY be missing, you are likely missing the benefits of whole grains.

enriched flour

degerminated (on corn meal)

bran

wheat germ

NO -- These words never describe whole grains.

Page 46: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Learn about whole WHITE wheat at the following website

http://www.wholegrainscouncil.org/whole-grains-101/whole-white-wheat-faq

Be prepared to share your impressions

Page 47: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu
Page 48: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Dietary supplements – to take or not to take?

Page 49: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

http://consensus.nih.gov/2006/2006MultivitaminMineralSOS028main.htm

Page 50: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Are MVM safe?

• Some ingredients in common MVM can produce adverse effects in certain people– Beta-carotene and smokers– Vitamin A and women– Vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol

• DSHEA– No pre-market approval required– Self-regulated industry

Page 51: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

http://www.usp.org/USPVerified/dietarySupplements/

Page 52: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Conclusion from NIH report:

• Finally, the present evidence is insufficient to recommend either for or against the use of MVMs by the American public to prevent chronic disease. The resolution of this important issue will require advances in research and improved communication and collaboration among scientists, health care providers, patients, the pharmaceutical and supplement industries, and the public.

Page 53: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

POSITION STATEMENTIt is the position of the American Dietetic

Association (ADA) that the best nutritional strategy for promoting optimal health and reducing the risk of chronic disease is to wisely choose a wide variety of foods. Additional nutrients from fortified foods

and/or supplements can help some people meet their nutritional needs as specified by science-based nutrition standards such as

the Dietary Reference Intakes.

http://www.eatright.org/ada/files/fort.pdf

Page 54: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Glycemic index

Page 55: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

http://www.glycemicindex.com/

Page 56: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu
Page 57: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Glycemic response to carbohydrate

• Glycemic index: the increase in blood glucose level over the baseline level during a 2-hour period for a defined amount of carbohydrate (usually 50 g) compared with the same amount of carbohydrate in a reference foods.

• Reference food typically white bread or glucose.

• Glycemic load: the weighted average glycemic index of individual foods - GI multiplied by the dietary carbohydrate content.

Page 58: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

(c) Fasting baseline

(b) Low glycemic index

Glucose mealHours

(a) Glucose(reference food)

Blo

od

glu

cose

(m

g/d

L)

Fig. 4-9, p. 83

Page 59: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Ludwig et al. 2002

Jama

Page 60: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Ludwig et al. 2002

Jama

Page 61: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

GI/GL categories

GI GL

Low <50 <10.5

Moderate 51-69 11-19.9

High >70 >20

Page 62: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

GI controversy

• Foods can have different GI values as a result of ripeness, variety and processing.

• Intra-individual variation. • The GI of a food eaten alone is different than the

GI of the same food eaten with other foods.• Standard test portions of foods used to

determine GI are NOT usual portions.• Low GI foods are not necessarily nutrient dense

foods. Low GI does not = “healthy”

Page 63: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Factors known to influence glycemic index of a food

• Fiber content

• Ripeness

• Type of carbohydrate

• Fat content of food

• Acid content of food

• Physical form of food processing etc.

Page 64: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

The good and the bad…

High GI, the good:• Better absorbed

during exercise• Facilitates greater

glycogen storage following exercise

• Easy to consume given high kcal requirements

High GI, the bad:• Cancer• CVD• Diabetes• Overweight/obesity

Page 65: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Ludwig et al. 2002

Jama

Page 66: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu
Page 67: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

Probiotics – bacteria for breakfast?

Page 68: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

• Find a recent news report on priobiotics

• Conduct a pubmed search to identify original research on probiotics– Look for a good review or meta-analysis

• Review this information

• Provide a critical analysis to the question: Should probiotics be included in a healthy, balanced diet?

Page 69: Nutrition: wading through current controversies and confusion Heidi Wengreen, R.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Utah State University Heidi.Wengreen@usu.edu

End of slides