nuclear terrorism threats nuclear security global nuclear governance nuclear security summit;...
TRANSCRIPT
Bong-Geun JUNProfessor and Director
Center for Nonproliferation and Nuclear SecurityIFANS, Seoul
The 10th ROK-UN Joint Conferenceon Disarmament and Nonproliferation Issues
November 7, 2011November 7, 2011
The Nuclear Security Sum-mit: Significance and
Achievements
Contents
ⅠⅠ Nuclear Terrorism Threats
Nuclear Security
Global Nuclear Governance
Nuclear Security Summit;background, significance, achievements
2012 Nuclear Security Summit
ⅡⅡ
ⅢⅢ
ⅣⅣ
ⅤⅤ
“Nuclear terrorism is one of the most challenging threats to international security, and strong nuclear security measures are the most effective means.”
“Gravely concerned by the threat of terrorism and the risk that non-State actors … may acquire , develop, traffic in or use nuclear, ...,weapons and their means of delivery, Recognizing the urgent need for all States to take additional effective measures to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, …,weapons and their means of delivery.”
On Nuclear Terrorism and Nuclear Security
IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradeiIAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei
UNSC Resolution 1540(2004)UNSC Resolution 1540(2004)
2010 Washington NSS Communiqué2010 Washington NSS Communiqué
“Nuclear terrorism is No. 1. security threat right now. If they get it, they will use it. (2008 IAEA Annual Conference)
Nuclear Terrorism Dangers
Terrorists’ plans and attempts to make and/or acquire nuclear bomb and its material
Civilian HEU and separated Pu stock become major targets of thefts and sabotage.
Global Fissile Material Stock(2010)
HEU(ton) Separated Pu(ton)
Military 1,600 250
Civilian 10 250
Total 1600 500
De
• Prevention, detection of and response
- to theft, sabotage, unauthorized ac-
cess, illegal transfer or other mali-
cious acts,
- involving nuclear material, other ra-
diological substances or their associ-
ated facilities
Nuclear Security: Definition
Nuclear security
Non-state actors
Nonproliferation
States
Nuclear security Nuclear safety
Intentional Natural, technical
Nuclear security Radiological securityNuclear terrorism, IND
Nuclear security Physical protectionborder control, export control, nuclear forensics, information security, etc
Material protec-tion, fence, guards
ACTOR
CAUSE
MEANS
MEASURES
Radiological terrorism, RDD
Nuclear Security and Comparisons
12
Nuclear Diarmament
Nuclear Safety Nuclear
Security
NPT’s 3 Pillars: Disarmament, Nonproliferation, PUNE
IAEA’s 3S: Safeguards, Nuclear Safety, Nuclear Security
Obama’s 4 Pillars for a Nuclear weapons free world:
Nuclear disarmament, Nonproliferation, PUNE, Nuclear Security
Nuclear Security in Global Nuclear Governance
GlobalNuclear
Governance
Non-Proliferation
Nuclear Security Summit: Background
about 30 cases of terrorism with over 100 deaths since 2000
The era of political instability and mass-killing terrorism
Terrorists seeking nuclear materials and weapons
HEU 25 kg or Pu 8 kg Per Nuclear Explosive Device Hundreds cases of losses or thefts of radiological Material, over 20 cases of losses or thefts of HEU/Pu since the 90s 130 HEU reactor
Over 2,000 tons of global fissile material stock (IPFM Report)
To secure all vulnerable nuclear material in 4 years To hold Global Summit on Nuclear Security in 2010 Endorsed by UNSC Res. 1887(2009.9)
President Obama’s call for NSS (2009.4.5)
Fukushima Nuclear Accident(2011.3)
NSS: Significance
The first and only summit forum on Nu-clear Security
- highest-level political attention
Participation of all stake-holders- goal- and action-oriented
Comprehensive ‘Governance’ approach- multiple norms, actors and issues- Partnership: states, IOs, business, NGO …
National voluntary commitments
• 50 global leaders sharing threats perception, agreeing on nu-clear security actions
• HEU/PU elimination and consolidation. Chile, Kazakhstan, Rus-sia, Ukraine, etc.; Shut-down or conversion of HEU reactors: Russia, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Vietnam
• Ratification of CPPNM 2005 Amendment and ICSANT
• Extension of the UNSC Res. 1540 Committee, G8 Global Partner-ship program; membership increase of GICNT:
• Strengthening IAEA NS function: IAEA Nuclear Security Fund, IAEA INFCIRC 225/rev.5(physical protection guideline document)
• Establishment of nuclear security training centers of excel-lences
(Source: The 2010 Nuclear Security Summit: A Status Update, Arms Control Associa-tion and Partnership for Global Security Report, 2011.4)
Achievements of the 2010 Summit
2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit
Summit March 26(M)~27(T), 2012, Seoul 47 Heads of States + plus 4 Representatives of IOs (UN, IAEA, EU, INTERPOL)
Pre-SummitExperts
Conference
March 23(F), 2012 Hosted by KINAC and IFANS Approx. 200 participants, including over 100 foreign guests Nuclear security policy, technical issues Technical exhibition
Business CEOConference
March 23(F), 2012
Hosted by KHNP
2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit
2012 Seoul NSS official website
: www.seoulnss.go.kr
2012 Nuclear Security Symposium(Draft)
“Innovating Global Nuclear Security Governance”
TITLE
• Progress since the 2010 NSS• Nuclear security activities by (NG)IOs: UN, IAEA, INTERPOL, WANO/INPO/WINS, etc.• Global Nuclear Security Governance: vision, goals, principles, innovations, strategies• Key issues - radiological security, interface between NS and NS, IAEA’s role, regional approach, international cooperation and coordination, HEU minimization, information security,
illicit trafficking, nuclear forensics, etc.• Beyond the 2012 Seoul Summit
PROGRAM
• Experts from NSS participating states, IOs, NGOs, labs, schools etc.• Media, general public
PARTICIPANTS
Why ‘Global Governance’ Approach?
GlobalGovernanceApproach
1
4
2
3
Diversified Normstreaties/ conventions, initiatives, national laws/regulations, code of conduct, best practice, principles, compliance program
Multiple ActorsStates, GIO, NGIO, NGOs, companies, labs, schools, individuals
Complexity, interrelation of issues
3 pillars of NPT, 3S/2S, development, economics, culture, sovereignty, globalization
Limits of traditional state-centered approach
THANK YOU!