nuclear physics (chapters 14) – strong societal themes and
TRANSCRIPT
Nuclear Physics (chapters 14) – strong societal themes and impact!
Nuclei – “Core of Matter, Fuel of Stars”
Strong or nuclear force – a 3rd fundamental forceRadioactivity (incl. a 4th fundamental force, the “weak” one)Ionizing radiation Nuclear binding – fusion & fission, their applications and (serious) implications
Strong (or nuclear) force: needed to hold the nucleus together.Why needed?
Strongest among the 4 fundamental forces, but very short-ranged:typical nuclear sizes few 10-15m (remember atomic sizes?)
The 4 fundamental forces (in decreasing strength) & connectionto the 3 classical types of radioactivity:
Strong (or nuclear) – α
(alpha) decay, emission of a 42 He nucleusElectromagnetic – γ
(gamma) decay, emission of energetic photon
Weak – β
(beta) decay, emission of e- or e+ in n(eutron)p(roton)Gravitational (irrelevant in nuclear physics)
Strong force strong nuclear binding lots of energy availablein nuclear reactions – good & bad consequences!
Why radioactivity/radioactive decays (or fission/fusion)? Ultimate fundamental physics reason?
Achieve a more stable, lower energy state!Excess energy (via E = mc2 ) Ethermal & Eradiation
Important definitions:1) Atomic # vs. mass # (# of protons vs. # of protons + neutrons)2) Element vs. isotope (place in periodic table, i.e. # of protons vs.# of neutrons for a given element)3) “Ionizing” radiation – α, β, x- and γ-rays (but also other energeticparticles, example: proton cancer therapy)
Radioactive decays & other nuclear reactions are the (medieval)alchemist’s dream – elements can be transformed into each other.
Quiz # 103: Which of these are ionizingelectromagnetic radiation?(a) α
and β
(b) β
and γ(c) γ
and cell phone signals (microwaves)
(d) γ
and x-rays(e) α
and x-rays
Quiz # 104: How do masses (m) and electric charges (q) of 3H and 3He compare?(a) m about the same and q in the ratio of 1 to 2.(b) m about the same and q in the ratio of 2 to 1.(c) m in the ratio of 1 to 2 and q the same.(d) m in the ratio of 1 to 2 and q in the ratio of 1 to 2.(e) m in the ratio of 2 to 1 and q in the ratio of 1 to 2.
Radioactive decay is a prime example of thestatistical or probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics and quantum mechanical indeterminacy.
“Half-life”
and“exponential”
decay
Important: looking at an individual
nucleus,can you predict when
it will decay, even if you know the isotopes half-life?
Note the enormous range of half-lives:
…..and some of the very long half-lives are perhaps the problem with nuclear energy –
how & where to store such radioactive waste?
Quiz # 105: If a radioactive isotope has a 1-year half-life, whatfraction will remain after 4 years?(a) 1/5 (b) 1/16 (c) ½ (d) ¼ (e) about 40%
Quiz # 106: If you had 1 gram of 235U and 1 gram of 238U, whichwould be more radioactive, i.e. which would emit more α
particles
per minute?
(a) 235U (b) 238U (c) need more/other info (d) same
Life is full of risks – “to live is to risk!”So let’s get on with it…..Not (at all) to belittle Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, and now(2011) Fukushima. But, always good & instructive to keep things
in some perspective:
Hobson cites 4000 excess cancer deaths from Chernobyl ( a badaccident!) during the next 70 years among Russians & Europeansexposed to the fallout. But this represents an increase in the cancer
death rate of only 0.003% among that population! (~125 millioncancer deaths in this population over those 70 years)Even under the controversial “linear hypothesis” this would increase by (only) a factor of about 4.
Another way to look at this, using the “microrisk” of table 14.6, i.e.1 in a million risk of death: average Chernobyl risk to Russians &Europeans is about 20 microrisks – like smoking 28 cigarettes!!