ntu radiated emissions and susceptibility - ntuemc.twntuemc.tw/theme/design/ec_lecture 7.pdf · why...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Radiated Emission and Susceptibility
Tzong-Lin Wu, Ph.D.
EMC LabDepartment of Electrical EngineeringNational Taiwan University
Differential-Mode v.s. Common-mode Currents
2
Differential-Mode v.s. Common-mode Currents
0 1 0 2
0 0
00 0
,1 ,2
1 21 2
( ) ( )
1 2
1 2
?? ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
j r j r
j r j r
j rj j
E E E
e eM I I Fr r
e eM I I Fr r
eM I e I e Fr
θ θ θ
β β
β β
ββ β
θ
θ
θ
− −
− +Δ − −Δ
−− Δ Δ
= +
= +
= ++ Δ −Δ
= +
M is a function of antenna type
F(θ) is the array factor
60 0 2 104
( ) sin
M j l j fl
F
η β ππθ θ
−⎧ = = ×⎪⎨⎪ =⎩
For Hertzian dipole
Differential-mode current emission model
A Question: Where is the maximum E field for the differential current ?
z
xθ
3
Differential-mode current emission model
Θ=90 is the maximum
Differential-mode current emission model
1
2
d
d
I II I== −
0 0 0/ 2 / 27,max
214
2 10 { }
1.316 10
j d j s j sDd
D
fI lE j e e edI f ls
d
β β βπ − −−
−
= × −
= ×
1. Reduce the loop size2. Reduce the current level
Can reduce the EMI
4
Differential-mode current emission for trapezoidal pulse train
EMI due to the differential-mode current is significant for higher frequencies.
An example
1m ribbon cable with 50mil distance carrying 20mA current at 30MHz
The EMI at 3m distance is about
40dBuV/m
It’s easy to over the FCC limit line
5
30cm
15cm12.5cm
5mm
30cm
15cm
Why the slot increase EMI ?
Common-mode Emission Model
1
2
c
c
I II I==
0 0 0/ 2 / 27,max
6
2 10 { }
1.257 10
j d j s j scd
c
fI lE j e e edI fld
β β βπ − −−
−
= × +
= ×
1. Reduce the trace length2. Reduce the current level
Can reduce the common-mode EMI
6
An Example
1m ribbon cable with 50mil distance carrying 7.96uA current at 30MHz
The EMI at 3m distance is about
40dBuV/m -> limit of FCC
Very small current will exceed the limit of FCC !
Common-mode current emission for trapezoidal pulse train
Common-mode EMI usually occursat low frequency range
7
Current Probe for common-mode current
Ampere’s Law andFaraday Law are both used inthe design
Calibration data:Zt = V / I (transfer impedance)
Why only common-mode current are Sensed in this probe?
Working principal ?
Current Probe Example
8
Examples for common-mode EMI
James L. Knighten et al., “Experimental Analysis of Common Mode Currents on Fiber Channel Cable Shields due to Skew Imbalance of Differential Signals Operating at 1.0625 Gb/s”, IEEE EMC Symposium, 1999
Lothar 0. Hoeft et al., “Spectral Analysis of Common Mode Currents on Fiber Channel Cable Shields due to Skew Imbalance of Differential Signals Operating at 1.0625 Gb/s”, IEEE EMC Symposium, 1998
James L. Knighten et al., “Effects of Device Variations on the EMI Potential of High Speed Digital Integrated Circuits”, IEEE EMC Symposium, 1997
Decomposition of the Common/Differential mode
9
Delay Skew effect on the Spectral components (1st harmonic)
Rise time is a minor effect on the spectral component
Skew effect on the Spectral components (1st harmonic)
11
Measurement Results for Common-mode current and their radiation
Fundamental Frequency
EMI increases about 9dB/decadeof the skew
Common-mode current v.s. EMI (measurement)
Fundamental Frequency
12
Higher harmonics
Delay Skew v.s. Common-mode current (measurement)
Questions:
• Why does 3rd harmonic not increase as skew increases ?
• Why does 2nd harmonic exist ?
Delay Skew v.s. Common-mode current
Increasing delay skew will increase the energy of 3rd harmonic.
But, impedance mismatch between trace on PCB and Cables increase the reflection coefficient.
Therefore the common-mode current of 3rd harmonic on the cable decreases.
13
About the Even harmonics2nd harmonic1st harmonic
Lack of symmetry of the waveform causes the even harmonics
Measurement setup for digital waveform
14
Digital waveform and its spectrum
Even harmonics
Asymmetry of the waveform may be resulted from
• Difference of the rise/fall times• Not 50% duty cycle (shorter or longer)
EMI for higher harmonics
15
Common-Mode EMI on the Ground Plane
A trace on a solid Ground plane
Common-Mode EMI on the Ground Plane
Equivalent Circuit
Common-mode Noise
It can be reduced by increasing the mutual inductance
How ?
16
Common-Mode EMI on the Ground Plane
Reducing trace HeightTo increase Mgs
Common-Mode EMI on the Ground Plane
Adding another return pathto decrease I2
Guard trace
Shunt trace
17
Common-Mode EMI on the Ground Plane
Resonant effect byImage Plane
Radiated Susceptibility
Interconnection filter Field generation antennaIncoming mains power filter
Area of uniform field
(1.5m×1.5m)
Field generation equipment Chamber penetration cables
3 mInterconnecting cables
0.8m
18
Test levels for radiated immunity( 80 MHz to 1000 MHz)
Level Test field strengthV/m
1 12 33 10x Special
NOTE – x is an open test level. This levelmay be given in the product specification.The signal is 80 % amplitude modulatedwith 1 kHz sinewave to simulate actualtreats.
Radiated Susceptibility
a.Modelling a two conductor line to determine the terminal voltages induced by incident eletromagnetic field.
8-2 Simple Susceptibility Models for wires and PCB Lands
SR+
_
+
_ LR
L y
x
VS VLS
Ei
Hi
Incident wave
x
y
z
S
The problem is:
predicting the V and V given the magnitude,polarization ,and direction of
the incident uniform plane wave(E , H )
_
L
i i
19
.Only two components of incident wave contribute to the induced voltage.b
SSR E iy
izH⊗− LR
equivalent Tx line model
SSR
XL+
( )_V X
XC
( )I x x+
LR( )I xS XI
ii yE E=
ii zH H= ( )induce
0
0
where per-unit-length
L= ( )
( )
n
n
sr
C sr
μπ ω
πε
ω
=for parallel-wire line
( ) ( )
0 00
. , = ?(1)by the Faraday's law the incident magnetic field
H will induce the emf in the loop.
emf =
=- -
per-unit-length so
s x s x
iz
iz
ssi i
z zys
cV I
j B d S
j H dS j x H dy
ω
ωμ ωμ=
⇒
=
∴
∫
∫ ∫
i
i
( ) 00
urce at x , -
(2)The incident E induces a voltage between the two conductors
,which induces a displacement current in the per-unit-length capacitance C.
( )
s is x zy
iy
emfV j H dyx
Is x
ωμ=
= =
∴ =
∫
0-
s iyy
j C E dyω=∫
20
x
00
.Derive the t -line equations
V( ) V( ) ( ) V( )
( ) ( ) V( ) ( ) Dividing x , and x 0
dV( ) ( ) V ( )
d ( )
S
s iS zy
d
x x x j L xI x x x
I x x I x j C x x x I x x
x j LI x x j H dydxI x jdx
ω
ω
ω ωμ
ω
=
+ − = − −
+ − = − + +→
⇒ + = − = +
+
∫
0V( ) ( ) -
s iS yy
C x I x j C E dyω=
= = ∫
0
. if the tx-line is electrically short = Lthe , C can be ignored
e λ
SR VS
+
_ VL
+
_LR
0izj H Aωμ i
- iyj CE Aω i
0 0 00
0
total source
V
- - -
s i i iS z z zy
s i i iS y y yy
L j H dy j H S L j H A
I L j C E dy j CE S L j CE A
ωμ ωμ ωμ
ω ω ω
=
=
∴
= ≅ =
= ≅ =
∫
∫
i i i
i i i0S L λ
0S L λ
area
21
0
0
f. It is easy to compute the induced voltage V and V
V
V
g.An example:
S L
S S Li iS z y
S L S L
L S Li iL z y
S L S L
R R Rj LSH j CLSER R R R
R R Rj LSH j CLSER R R R
ωμ ω
ωμ ω
∴
= −+ +
= − −+ +
50Ω 150Ω
1m
50milVS
+
−VL
+
−
8 7 30
(1)only magnetic field induce voltage source.
(2)V 2 10 4 10 1 1.27 1070
26.6
ii
S n
Ej LSH A j m
j mv
ωμ π π − −= = × × × × × × × ×
=
10
100
vEi mf MHz
=
=
(3)
50Ω 150ΩVS
+
−
26.6j mv
50 V 26.6 6.6550 150
150 V 26.6 2050 150
S
L
j mv j mv
j mv j mv
= =+
= − = −+
22
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Example (1):
What kind of noise will couple to the transmission line ?
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Voltage noise source
23
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Example 2
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Example 3. Current Injection Technique in Conducted Susceptibility Test
Can this technique replace the R.S. test ?“Investigation of the Bulk Current Injection Technique by Comparison to Induced Currents from Radiated Electromagnetic Fields”, IEEE EMC Symposium, p412 – p417, 1996
24
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Testing probes and their working principle
Test Plate for generating uniform EM wave
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
25
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Uniform field check
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Three different cases
26
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line
Calculated by previous theory
Measured under Parallel Plate
Measured under BCI technique
They are quite consistent below100MHz
1 Ohm case
Radiated Susceptibility for a transmission line50 Ohm Case270 Ohm case
Summary: BCI technique can be used in low frequency range to complement thehigh frequency radiation susceptibility test