nstx-u collaboration plans for ucla

4
NSTX-U NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans - April / May 2014 NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators: E. Belova, N. Gorelenkov & W. Guttenfelder NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC

Upload: lalasa

Post on 16-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NSTX-U. Supported by . NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA. PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI : Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators : E. Belova , N. Gorelenkov & W. Guttenfelder. Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NSTX-U Collaboration  Plans for UCLA

NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLAPI: Neal A. Crocker

Co-PI: Prof. Troy CarterGrad. Student (planned 2nd year onward)

PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:E. Belova, N. Gorelenkov & W. Guttenfelder

NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan MeetingsPPPL – LSB B318April / May 2014

NSTX-U Supported by

Culham Sci CtrYork U

Chubu UFukui U

Hiroshima UHyogo UKyoto U

Kyushu UKyushu Tokai U

NIFSNiigata UU Tokyo

JAEAInst for Nucl Res, Kiev

Ioffe InstTRINITI

Chonbuk Natl UNFRI

KAISTPOSTECH

Seoul Natl UASIPP

CIEMATFOM Inst DIFFER

ENEA, FrascatiCEA, Cadarache

IPP, JülichIPP, Garching

ASCR, Czech Rep

Coll of Wm & MaryColumbia UCompXGeneral AtomicsFIUINLJohns Hopkins ULANLLLNLLodestarMITLehigh UNova PhotonicsORNLPPPLPrinceton UPurdue USNLThink Tank, Inc.UC DavisUC IrvineUCLAUCSDU ColoradoU IllinoisU MarylandU RochesterU TennesseeU TulsaU WashingtonU WisconsinX Science LLC

Page 2: NSTX-U Collaboration  Plans for UCLA

NSTX-U NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans - April / May 2014 2

UCLA supported FY2014 – 2017 to investigate CAE/GAE role in NSTX-U core energy transport

• Two independent tasks in parallel over four years:– (1) Advance CAE/GAE predictive capability experimental validation of ⇒

HYM physics model + prioritization of HYM development– (2) Improve physics understanding of transport mechanism ⇒

experimental test of hypotheses:• (a) resonant orbit interaction & (b) energy channeling via coupling to KAWs

• Supports 1/3 PI & UCLA Grad. for last 3 years• In FY2014, exploit NSTX data (good data set in 2010)

– Comparison with HYM simulation• synthetic diagnostic development: BES, reflectometry, interferometry

– Model energy transport w/mode measurements & compare w/experiment

• In FY2014, prepare for NSTX-U experiments:– Model GAE/CAE NSTX-U activity – HYM + TRANSP Scenarios– Model energy transport

Page 3: NSTX-U Collaboration  Plans for UCLA

NSTX-U NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans - April / May 2014

Research needs and plans for FY2015 & beyond

• Starting FY2015: investigate pitch angle dependence of CAEs/GAEs using new beams

• Each year: investigate parameter dependence in new regimes as BT & IP increases in stages

• Improved MHz measurement capability desirable– core access

• continued improvement of BES (e.g. signal-to-noise)• core reflectometry in high performance (i.e. high density) plasmas

– internal magnetic fluctuations• Polarimetry• Local measurements?

– other internal MHz fluctuation diagnostics?

• Need NSTX-U support for Elena Belova & HYM development

3

Page 4: NSTX-U Collaboration  Plans for UCLA

NSTX-U NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans - April / May 2014

To enhance student participation in NSTX-U research, solicitations should encourage educational component

• FES-related DOE solicitations (e.g. 2013 NSTX-U Collaboration Solicitation) do not explicitly encourage student research– In contrast, NSF-DOE Basic Plasma Science solicitations do explicitly

encourage support for education – important criterion in proposal review

• Increased education emphasis in solicitations would encourage U.S. student (and University) participation in NSTX-U program– Industry respondents would NOT be excluded since they can support

student research in partnership with Universities– would be effective even if less emphatic than NSF – as long as

proposal review gives weight to education support

4