1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 PRODUCTION REPORTS

NSP2 Summary ReportThrough Third Quarter 2012

REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS BY UNIT TYPE PROJECTED* VS. ACTUAL

PROJECTED

ACTUAL

TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 5,995

TOTAL ACQUISITION: 765

TOTAL CLEARANCE / DEMO: 2,092

TOTAL HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE: 583

TOTAL REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION: 2,555

TOTAL COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE

ACQUISITION

CLEARANCE / DEMO

HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE

REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION

COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE PROJECTED* VS. ACTUAL

PROJECTED

ACTUAL

ACQUISITION

CLEARANCE/ DEMO

HOME- OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE

REHAB/NEW CONSTRUCTION

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Single FamilyMultifamily

1,028

11,1174,107

765

19,663

2,555

2,092

583

3,427

4,495

1,223

7,061

0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000

Actual

Projected

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Single FamilyMultifamily

1,028

11,1174,107

765

19,663

2,555

2,092

583

3,427

4,495

1,223

7,061

0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000

Actual

Projected

2,092

43%

35%

13%

2,555

583

765

10%

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Single FamilyMultifamily

1,028

11,1174,107

765

19,663

2,555

2,092

583

3,427

4,495

1,223

7,061

0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000

Actual

ProjectedSingle-Family = 1–4 units; Multifamily = 4+ units*  “Projected” refers to the total projected number of households (or properties for Clearance / Demo)

the Grantee anticipates to complete by the end of their NSP grant for each Activity Type.

NSP completed rehabilitation in Santa Ana, California

© C

ity o

f Sa

nta

Ana

2

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity

with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 PRODUCTION REPORTS

Alameda County, CA 24 0 24

LH25 0 0LMMI 24 0 24

Boston, MA 4 0 20 24

LH25 0 11 11LMMI 4 0 9 13

Camden Redevelopment Agency 0 0 33 33

LH25 0 33 33LMMI 0 0 0

Center for Community Self Help 0 65 65

LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 50 50

Chicago, IL 0 1 0 1

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 1 0 1

Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. 6 17 20 409 452

LH25 5 17 8 209 239LMMI 1 0 12 200 213

City of Little Rock 0 0 0 4 4

LH25 0 1 1LMMI 0 0 3 3

City of Reno Housing Authority 111 111

LH25 62 62LMMI 49 49

City of Sarasota 44 2 0 46

LH25 22 0 22LMMI 22 2 0 24

Columbus, OH 96 36 132

LH25 14 14LMMI 96 22 118

Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation 389 36 425

LH25 0 0LMMI 389 36 425

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL3

Dayton, OH 967 1 55 1023

LH25 9 9LMMI 967 1 46 1014

Denver, CO 40 59 19 118

LH25 59 59LMMI 40 19 59

El Paso Collaborative 79 79

LH25 36 36LMMI 43 43

Evanston, IL 0 28 28

LH25 0 11 11LMMI 17 17

Habitat for Humanity International Inc 4 0 61 65

LH25 2 0 35 37LMMI 2 26 28

Hamilton County, OH 0 18 56 74

LH25 28 28LMMI 0 18 28 46

Healthy Neighborhoods Inc. 33 3 58 94

LH25 11 17 28LMMI 22 3 41 66

Housing Authority of Camden City 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0

Housing Authority of the City of Tampa 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0

Housing Trust of Santa Clara County 51 79 130

LH25 6 51 57LMMI 45 28 73

Indio, CA 0 17 17

LH25 0 7 7LMMI 10 10

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL4

Lake Worth Community Redevelopment Agency 0 0 0 41 41

LH25 0 0 23 23LMMI 0 0 0 18 18

Long Beach, CA 11 75 86

LH25 11 11LMMI 0 75 75

Los Angeles Neighborhood Housing Services Inc. 91 91

LH25 0 0LMMI 91 91

Los Angeles, CA 42 42

LH25 13 13LMMI 29 29

Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation 27 184 211

LH25 60 60LMMI 27 124 151

Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency 197 6 32 235

LH25 192 5 197LMMI 5 6 27 38

Milwaukee, WI 115 10 1 126

LH25 3 1 4LMMI 115 7 0 122

Minneapolis, MN 0 44 0 44

LH25 5 0 5LMMI 0 39 0 39

Modesto, CA 45 45

LH25 5 5LMMI 40 40

National Housing Trust Community Development Fund 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0

Neighborhood Housing Services of Orange County 30 30

LH25 15 15LMMI 15 15

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL5

Neighborhood Housing Services of South Florida, Inc. 3 3

LH25 0 0LMMI 3 3

Neighborhood Lending Partners of West Florida, Inc. 141 23 3 0 167

LH25 26 0 26LMMI 115 23 3 0 141

New Orleans Redevelopment Authority 0 20 67 87

LH25 24 24LMMI 0 20 43 63

New York City, NY 0 0 0 0

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0 0 0

Newark, NJ 0 0 0

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0 0

North Little Rock, AR 26 0 19 45

LH25 14 14LMMI 26 0 5 31

Palm Beach County, FL 1 16 0 17

LH25 0 12 0 12LMMI 1 4 0 5

Philadelphia, PA 0 0 0

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0

Phoenix, AZ 0 13 0 84 97

LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 13 0 84 97

Pima County, AZ 18 124 102 244

LH25 33 39 72LMMI 18 91 63 172

Prichard Housing Authority 31 24 43 98

LH25 0 0LMMI 31 24 43 98

COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)

Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report

LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT

HOME- REHAB/

CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW

GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL6

Reading, PA 0 13 13

LH25 0 5 5LMMI 0 8 8

Rock Island Economic Growth Corporation 0 14 2 34 50

LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 14 2 19 35

Santa Ana, CA 29 3 32

LH25 0 0LMMI 29 3 32

Springfield, OH 0 78 10 88

LH25 0 9 9LMMI 0 78 1 79

St Paul, MN 0 19 20 39

LH25 0 10 10LMMI 0 19 10 29

State of Delaware 0 4 23 27

LH25 3 7 10LMMI 0 1 16 17

State of Michigan 249 0 5 254

LH25 0 1 1LMMI 249 0 4 253

State of Ohio 3 17 20

LH25 5 5LMMI 3 12 15

State of Oregon 76 40 116

LH25 7 31 38LMMI 69 9 78

The Community Builders, Inc. 637 637

LH25 409 409LMMI 228 228

Toledo, OH 0 5 5

LH25 0 0LMMI 0 5 5

Washington, DC 0 44 16 60

LH25 0 44 16 60LMMI 0 0 0

Grand Total 765 2,092 583 2,555 5,995