notice of filing...2014/06/18 · ccpl, a wholly owned subsidiary of cc international. 6. the...
TRANSCRIPT
NOTICE OF FILING
This document was lodged electronically in the FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FCA) on
14/06/2018 5:17:22 PM AEST and has been accepted for filing under the Court’s Rules. Details of
filing follow and important additional information about these are set out below.
Details of Filing
Document Lodged: Defence - Form 33 - Rule 16.32
File Number: NSD900/2015
File Title: Sean Lynch v Cash Converters Personal Finance Pty Ltd ACN 110 275 762
& Anor
Registry: NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY - FEDERAL COURT OF
AUSTRALIA
Dated: 14/06/2018 5:17:29 PM AEST Registrar
Important Information
As required by the Court’s Rules, this Notice has been inserted as the first page of the document which
has been accepted for electronic filing. It is now taken to be part of that document for the purposes of
the proceeding in the Court and contains important information for all parties to that proceeding. It
must be included in the document served on each of those parties.
The date and time of lodgment also shown above are the date and time that the document was received
by the Court. Under the Court’s Rules the date of filing of the document is the day it was lodged (if
that is a business day for the Registry which accepts it and the document was received by 4.30 pm local
time at that Registry) or otherwise the next working day for that Registry.
NOTICE OF FILING
This document was lodged electronically in the FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FCA) on 14/06/2018 5:17:22 PM AEST and lias been accepted for filing under the Court’s Rules. Details of filing follow and important additional information about these are set out below.
Details of Filing
Document Lodged: Defence - Form 33 - Rule 16.32File Number: NSD900/2015
File Title: Sean Lynch v Cash Converters Personal Finance Pty Ltd ACN 110 275 762& Anor
Registry: NEW SOUTH WALES REGISTRY - FEDERAL COURT OFAUSTRALIA
Dated: 14/06/2018 5:17:29 PM AEST Registrar
Important Information
As required by the Court’s Rules, this Notice has been inserted as the first page of the document which has been accepted for electronic filing. It is now taken to be part of that document for the purposes of the proceeding in the Court and contains important infonnation for all parties to that proceeding. It must be included in the document served on each of those parties.
The date and time of lodgment also shown above are the date and time that the document was received by the Court. Under the Court’s Rules the date of filing of the document is the day it was lodged (if that is a business day for the Registry which accepts it and the document was received by 4.30 pm local time at that Registry) or otherwise the next working day for that Registry.
Form 33 Rule 16.32
Se€Oftd-Ihird Further Amended DefenceAmended on £3-14 October June 204^2018 pursuant to the order of Justice Gleeson dated 24
Ao&ust-2Q42-29 Mav 2.018
No. NSD900 of 2015Federal Court of Australia
District Registry: New South Wales
Division: General
Sean Lynch
Applicant
Cash Converters Personal Finance Pty Ltd (ACN 110 275 762) and another named in the Schedule
First Respondent
Capitalised terms have the same meaning as set out in the Second Further Amended
Statement of Claim dated 44 September 2-917-29 Mav 2018 unless otherwise stated.
In answer to the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim dated
Mav 2018. the respondents plead as follows:
A. THE GROUP MEMBERS
1. In answer to paragraph 1, the respondents:
a. admit that the applicant brings this proceeding as a representative proceeding in
his own right and on behalf of the Group Members; and
b. otherwise do not know and cannot admit paragraph 1.
Filed on behalf of (name & role of party)Prepared by (name of person/lawyer)Law firm (if applicable) Herbert Smith Freehills Tel Email
Cash Converters Personal Finance Pty Ltd ACN 110 275 762 (Respondent)Safrock Finance Corporation (QLD) Pty Ltd ACN 098 566 520 (Respondent)Peter Butler
+61 2 9225 5000 Fax +61 2 9322 4000P eter. But I e [email protected]
Address for service(include state and postcode)
C/- Herbert Smith Freehills, 161 Castlereagh St, Sydney NSW 2000
[Form approved 01/08/2011]
2
B. THE PARTIES
2. In answer to paragraph 2, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 2(b); and
b. do not know and cannot admit the allegations in paragraphs 2(a) and 2(c).
3. The respondents admit paragraph 3 and further say that prior to 15 November 2004 CC
Personal Finance was called ‘Saflend Pty Ltd’.
4. The respondents admit paragraph 4.
C. CASH CONVERTERS BUSINESS STRUCTURE & SYSTEM
5. The respondents admit paragraph 5, save that the respondents say that
all franchise operations, including those internationally, have been and are operated by
CCPL, a wholly owned subsidiary of CC International.
6. The respondents admit paragraph 6.
7. In answer to paragraph 7, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 7(a) save that they say that until at least 31 August 2010 Bak
operated the personal finance centre within the Cash Converters branded store
at Shop 2, 2 William St, Goodna OLD 4300; and
b. admit paragraphs 7(b), 7(c) and 7(d).
8. In answer to paragraph 8, the respondents:
a. say that the personal finance centre within the Cash Converters branded store at
Shop 2, 2 William St, Goodna OLD 4300 (Cash Converters Goodna) was
operated by:
i. Bak prior to 31 August 2010;
ii. either Bak or CC Cash Advance from 1 September 2010 until 30 June
2011;
iii. CC Cash Advance from 1 July 2011 until 30 June 2013; and
b. otherwise deny the allegations in that paragraph.
Particulars
49799279
3
On 31 August 2010, CC Cash Advance purchased the shares in Ebak, which
involved an ‘earn out’ period. As such, the best particulars that the
respondents can provide at this stage is that, from 1 September 2010 until 30
June 2011, the personal finance centre within Cash Converters Goodna was
operated by either CC Cash Advance or Bak (as a wholly owned subsidiary
of CC Cash Advance).
9. The respondents admit paragraph 9.
10. The respondents admit paragraph 10.
11. In answer to paragraph 11, the respondents:
a. admit that at all material times from 1 July 2010, they were required to comply
with the Credit (Commonwealth Powers) Act 2010 (Old) (Qld Act);
b. rely on the full terms of the Qld Act including sections 30 to 34; and
c. otherwise deny the paragraph.
12. In answer to paragraph 12, the respondents:
a. admit that since at least October 2007, there has been loan administration
software and an internet platform provided by CC Personal Finance (previously
Safrock Finance Group Pty Ltd) (Safrock System), which, in relation to loans
styled as personal loans:
i. enabled the Qld Franchisee or Qld Franchisee Broker to conduct a
preliminary assessment of the unsuitability of the proposed loan for the
consumer for submission to Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance;
ii. enabled the generation of documents including the documents entitled:
1. Appointment of Broker’; and/or (from on or around 3 October
2011) ‘Quote for Providing Credit Assistance’;
2. ‘Contract - Part 1 Schedule’ or ‘Loan Contract’ (including pages
headed The Schedule’); and
3. (from on or around 3 October 2011) 'Credit Proposal’;
49799279
4
iii. was used by the Qld Franchisee or Qld Franchisee Broker and Safrock
and/or CC Personal Finance to formulate the amounts and schedules for
repayment of principal and the payment of interest by consumers;
iv. enabled Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance to conduct and document a
final assessment of the unsuitability of the proposed loan for the
consumer;
v. enabled Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance to check all necessary
documentation and to verify the data contained therein;
vi. in conjunction with Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance, caused direct
debits to occur directly to a consumer’s bank account;
vii. arranged fees and/or commissions payable by Safrock and/or CC
Personal Finance (if any) to be set and effected; and
viii. enabled reporting as to each individual loan taken by a consumer to be
accessible by entities including Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance;
b. say that:
i. the Safrock System is a customer relationship management system used
to store and display data on customers and their loan arrangements,
perform calculations and generate documentation relevant to loans;
ii. in the period prior to 1 July 2009, the loan administration software and
internet platform provided exclusively by Mon-e (Mon-e System) was
used in relation to loans styled as cash advances, which are not the
subject of these proceedings;
iii. in the period prior to 1 July 2009, the Safrock System was used in relation
to loans styled as personal loans;
iv. from 1 July 2009, the Mon-e System was incorporated into the Safrock
System, and from that date, the Safrock System, provided by CC
Personal Finance in combination with Mon-e, was used in relation to
loans styled as personal loans and loans styled as cash advances;
49799279
5
v. at all material times the Safrock System was used in relation to the Qld
Loan Contracts;
c. deny that the Mon-e System was used in relation to the Qld Loan Contracts; and
d. otherwise deny the allegations in that paragraph.
Particulars
In respect of sub-paragraphs 12(a)(i) - (ii): The relevant employee of the Qld
Franchisee or Qld Franchisee Broker conducted a verbal interview with the
consumer to verify that the consumer met identified qualifying criteria (age,
residency status and income status) and if these criteria were met, obtained
supporting documentation from the consumer and used the Safrock System to:
1. print pro forma documents for the consumer to complete;
2. upload completed documents;
3. input the loan amount sought and repayment term; and
4. submit the proposed loan documentation and supporting documentation
to Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance for consideration and processing
with a preliminary assessment of unsuitability for the consumer.
This process is outlined in the following documents:
• Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators
(Queensland and Western Australia)’.
• Document entitled 'Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators’.
• Document entitled ‘Personal Finance Centre Policies and Procedures’
dated 22 February 2011.
• Document entitled ‘Personal Finance Centre Policies and Procedures’
dated 28 September 2011.
In respect of sub-paragraph 12(a)(iii): The Safrock System calculated the
amounts and schedules for repayment of principal and the payment of interest by
consumers for the Qld Franchisee or Qld Franchisee Broker based on the loan
amount and loan term forming part of the loan application and, where applicable,
49799279
6
reformulated those amounts for Safrock or CC Personal Finance based on any
changes made to the loan amount and loan term by Safrock or CC Personal
Finance.
In respect of sub-paragraph 12(a)(iv): The Safrock System included the
following data fields:
1. a processing notes facility, which allowed the relevant employee of
Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance to manually record notes relevant
to the application process for Personal Loans; and
2. a history field, which created a system generated audit trail when the
relevant employee of Safrock and/or CC Personal Finance completed
the tasks for each stage of the application process.
In respect of sub-paragraph 12(a)(v): The relevant employee verified the data,
as recorded in the Safrock System, by:
1. averaging the income contained in bank statements over the period of
the statement;
2. confirming bank details; and
3. conducting employment checks.
13. The respondents deny paragraph 13, and repeat the matters at paragraph 12.
14. In answer to paragraph 14, the respondents:
a. admit that the entities referred to in paragraphs 14(a) to (d) have:
i. since at least October 2007, been required by CCPL (either directly or
indirectly), when offering unsecured loans styled as personal loans
through a personal finance centre in any Cash Converters branded store
in Queensland or online to Queensland residents to use the Safrock
System in order to originate those loans;
ii. since at least October 2007 until 1 July 2009, been required by CCPL
(either directly or indirectly), when offering unsecured loans styled as
cash advances through a personal finance centre in any Cash Converters
49799279
7
branded store in Queensland or online to Queensland residents to use
the Mon-e System in order to originate and administer those loans; and
ill. since 1 July 2009, been required by CCPL (either directly or indirectly),
when offering unsecured loans styled as personal loans or as cash
advances through a personal finance centre in any Cash Converters
branded store in Queensland or online to Queensland residents to use
the Safrock System in order to originate and administer those loans;
b. repeat the matters at paragraph 12; and
c. otherwise deny the allegations in that paragraph.
D. LOANS TO THE APPLICANT
D1. First Lynch Loan
15. The respondents admit paragraph 15.
16. In answer to paragraph 16, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 16(a);
b. admit that the First Lynch Appointment of Broker contained an acknowledgment
by the applicant that Cash Converters Goodna acted exclusively for Safrock and
did not seek to obtain credit from any other credit providers;
c. admit that a term of the First Lynch Appointment of Broker was that the applicant
would pay Cash Converters Goodna a Broker’s Fee of $210 (First Lynch
Brokerage Fee);
d. further say that the applicant was provided with the following documents at or
around the same time as he signed the First Lynch Appointment of Broker:
i. Cash Converters Brokers’ Booklet, comprising:
1. Information Statement;
2. Standard Terms and Conditions;
3. Client Service Agreement; and
4. Useful Information;
ii. Loan Application Form;
49799279
8
iii. Contract - Part 1 Schedule;
iv. [deleted]
v. [deleted]
vi. [deleted]
vii. [deleted]; and
viii. Direct Debit Request; and
e. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the First Lynch
Appointment of Broker, and the documents referred to in sub-paragraph d above.
Particulars
1. Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators
(Queensland and Western Australia)’, steps 3 - 5 of “Procedures:
Unsecured Loans”.
2. Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators’,
steps 3 - 5 of “Procedures: Unsecured Loans”.
3. Cash Converters Brokers’ Booklet, comprising:
a. Information Statement;
b. Standard Terms and Conditions;
c. Client Service Agreement; and
d. Useful Information;
4. Loan Application Form signed by the applicant and dated 26
August 2010;
5. Contract - Part 1 Schedule signed by the applicant and dated 26
August 2010; and
6. [deleted]
7. [deleted]
8. [deleted]
9. [deleted]
10. Direct Debit Request signed by the applicant.
49799279
9
11. The Safrock System records that employees of Safrock involved
with the processing of the First Lynch Loan were Jamie Dunne,
Lynette Ware and Sam Roughead.
12. The Safrock System records that Lynette Ware approved the First
Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue
of subpoenas and notices to produce.
17. In answer to paragraph 17, the respondents:
a. admit that on 26 August 2010, the applicant signed a document entitled ‘Contract
- Part 1 Schedule’ pursuant to which he offered to enter into a contract with
Safrock on the terms and conditions set out in that document (First Lynch
Contract Form);
b. admit that the First Lynch Contract Form provided that the annual percentage
rate which applied was 48.00%;
c. repeat paragraph 16.d and the particulars of paragraph 16 in respect of the First
Lynch Contract Form; and
d. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the First Lynch
Contract Form, and the documents referred to in paragraph 16.d above.
18. In answer to paragraph 18, the respondents:
a. admit that the applicant received $810 representing the ‘Amount of credit’ defined
in the First Lynch Contract Form;
b. otherwise deny paragraph 18; and
c. further say that pursuant to a licence agreement dated 30 July 2008 between
Cash Converters Goodna, Safrock and CCPL, Safrock remitted:
i. an amount of $88.50 to Cash Converters Goodna, comprising the First
Lynch Brokerage Fee less an amount payable by Cash Converters
Goodna to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic bank transfer,
as part of a payment in or around September 2010; and
49799279
10
ii. an amount of $121.50 to CCPL, comprising an amount payable by Cash
Converters Goodna to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic
bank transfer, as part of a payment in or around September 2010.
Particulars
Licence Agreement dated 30 July 2008.
D2. Second Lynch Loan
19. The respondents admit paragraph 19.
20. In answer to paragraph 20, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 20(a);
b. admit that the Second Lynch Appointment of Broker contained an
acknowledgment by the applicant that Cliffview Pty Ltd t/a Cash Converters Inala
(Cash Converters Inala) acted exclusively for CC Personal Finance and did not
seek to obtain credit from any other credit providers;
c. admit that a term of the Second Lynch Appointment of Broker was that the
applicant would pay Cash Converters Inala a Broker’s Fee of $210 (Second
Lynch Brokerage Fee);
d. further say that the applicant was provided with the following documents at the
same time as he signed the Second Lynch Appointment of Broker:
i. Cash Converters Brokers' Booklet, comprising:
1. Information Statement;
2. Standard Terms and Conditions;
3. Client Service Agreement; and
4. Useful Information;
ii. Loan Application Form;
iii. Contract - Part 1 Schedule;
iv. Credit Assistance Consumer Acknowledgement;
v. Quote for Providing Credit Assistance;
vi. Credit Guide for Cash Converters Inala;
49799279
11
vii. Credit Proposal; and
viii. Direct Debit Request; and
e. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the Second Lynch
Appointment of Broker, and the documents referred to in sub-paragraph d above.
Particulars
1. Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators
(Queensland and Western Australia)’, steps 3 - 5 of “Procedures:
Unsecured Loans”.
2. Document entitled 'Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators’,
steps 3 - 5 of “Procedures: Unsecured Loans".
3. Document entitled ‘Personal Finance Centre Policies and
Procedures’ dated 28 September 2011, sections 1.3 and 3.1.
4. Cash Converters Brokers’ Booklet, comprising:
a. Information Statement;
b. Standard Terms and Conditions;
c. Client Service Agreement; and
d. Useful Information;
5. Loan Application Form signed by the applicant and dated 1 June
2012;
6. Contract - Part 1 Schedule signed by the applicant and dated 1
June 2012;
7. Credit Assistance Consumer Acknowledgement signed by the
applicant and dated 1 June 2012;
8. Quote for Providing Credit Assistance signed by the applicant and
dated 1 June 2012;
9. Credit Guide for Cash Converters Inala;
49799279
12
10. Credit Proposal between Cash Converters Inala, CC Personal
Finance and the applicant; and
11. Direct Debit Request signed by the applicant and dated 1 June
2012.
12. The Safrock System records that employees of Cash Converters
Inala involved with the Second Lynch Loan were Shona Carran
and Chris Robinson.
13. The Safrock System records that employees of CC Personal
Finance involved with the processing of the Second Lynch Loan
were Bruce Tupicoff, Jenipher Tupicoff, Travis Irons, Lisa Ryan,
Vithna Tickner, Byron Davey and Kellie Bowie.
14. The Safrock System records that Bruce Tupicoff approved the
Second Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue
of subpoenas and notices to produce.
21. In answer to paragraph 21, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 21;
b. repeat paragraph 20.d and the particulars of paragraph 20 in respect of the
Second Lynch Loan Quote; and
c. rely on the full terms of the Second Lynch Loan Quote, and the documents
referred to in paragraph 20.d above.
22. In answer to paragraph 22, the respondents:
a. admit that on 1 June 2012, the applicant signed a document entitled ‘Contract -
Part 1 Schedule’ pursuant to which he offered to enter into a contract with CC
Personal Finance on the terms and conditions set out in that document (Second
Lynch Contract Form);
49799279
13
b. admit that the Second Lynch Contract Form provided that the annual percentage
rate which applied was 48.00%;
c. repeat paragraph 20.d and the particulars of paragraph 20 in respect of the
Second Lynch Contract Form; and
d. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the Second Lynch
Contract Form, and the documents referred to in paragraph 20.d above.
22A. In answer to paragraph 22A, the respondents deny that paragraph and say that on or
around 1 June 2012, a credit proposal was prepared in respect of the Second Lynch
Loan that addressed the matters pleaded in paragraphs 22A(a) - 22A(d) of the Second
Further Amended Statement of Claim and say that the credit proposal was generated
from the Safrock System and not the Mon-e System.
22B. The respondents admit paragraph 22B.
23. In answer to paragraph 23, the respondents:
a. admit that the applicant received $810 representing the 'Amount of credit’ defined
in the Second Lynch Contract Form;
b. otherwise deny paragraph 23; and
c. further say that CC Personal Finance remitted:
i. an amount of $88.50 to Cash Converters Inala, comprising the Second
Lynch Brokerage Fee less an amount payable by Cash Converters Inala
to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic bank transfer, as part of
a payment in or around June 2012; and
ii. an amount of $121.50 to CCPL, comprising an amount payable by Cash
Converters Inala to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic bank
transfer, as part of a payment in or around June 2012.
D3. Third Lynch Loan
24. The respondents admit paragraph 24.
25. In answer to paragraph 25, the respondents:
a. admit paragraph 25(a);
49799279
14
b. admit that the Third Lynch Appointment of Broker contained an acknowledgment
by the applicant that Cash Converters Goodna acted exclusively for CC Personal
Finance and did not seek to obtain credit from any other credit providers;
c. admit that a term of the Third Lynch Appointment of Broker was that the applicant
would pay Cash Converters Goodna a Broker’s Fee of $210 (Third Lynch
Brokerage Fee);
d. further say that the applicant was provided with the following documents at the
same time as he signed the Third Lynch Appointment of Broker:
i. Cash Converters Brokers’ Booklet, comprising:
1. Information Statement;
2. Standard Terms and Conditions;
3. Client Service Agreement; and
4. Useful Information;
ii. Loan Application Form;
iii. Loan Contract, including pages headed The Schedule’;
iv. Credit Assistance Consumer Acknowledgement;
v. Quote for Providing Credit Assistance;
vi. Credit Guide for Bak Property Ltd;
vii. Credit Proposal; and
viii. Direct Debit Request; and
e. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the Third Lynch
Appointment of Broker, and the documents referred to in sub-paragraph d above.
Particulars
1. Document entitled 'Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators
(Queensland and Western Australia)’, steps 3 - 5 of "Procedures:
Unsecured Loans”.49799279
15
2. Document entitled 'Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators’,
steps 3-5 of “Procedures: Unsecured Loans”.
3. Document entitled ‘Personal Finance Centre Policies and
Procedures’ dated 28 September 2011, sections 1.3 and 3.1.
4. Cash Converters Brokers’ Booklet, comprising:
a. Information Statement;
b. Standard Terms and Conditions;
c. Client Service Agreement; and
d. Useful Information;
5. Loan Application Form signed by the applicant and dated 27
October 2012;
6. Loan Contract, including pages headed The Schedule’, signed by
the applicant and dated 27 October 2012;
7. Credit Assistance Consumer Acknowledgement signed by the
applicant and dated 27 October 2012;
8. Quote for Providing Credit Assistance signed by the applicant and
dated 27 October 2012;
9. Credit Guide for Bak Property Ltd; and
10. Credit Proposal between Cash Converters Goodna, CC Personal
Finance and the applicant; and
11. Direct Debit Request signed by the applicant and dated 27
October 2012.
12. The Safrock System records that employees of CC Personal
Finance involved with the processing of the Third Lynch Loan
49799279
16
were Lynette Ware, Krystine Crutcher, Debra Lanham and Jake
Becroft.
13. The Safrock System records that Lynette Ware approved the
Third Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue
of subpoenas and notices to produce.
26. In answer to paragraph 26, the respondents:
a. admit that on 27 October 2012, the applicant signed a document entitled ‘Quote
for Providing Credit Assistance’ (Third Lynch Loan Quote);
b. say that the reference in the Third Lynch Loan Quote to CC Personal Finance
acting as broker was incorrect and, consistently with the Third Lynch
Appointment of Broker, Cash Converters Goodna in fact acted as the broker;
c. admit that Cash Converters Goodna offered to provide credit assistance to the
applicant on the terms of the Third Lynch Loan Quote which included terms that:
i. the maximum amount of credit would be $810;
ii. the maximum term of the credit would be 6 months; and
iii. the applicant would pay to the broker a Broker’s Fee of $210;
d. repeat paragraph 25.d and the particulars of paragraph 25 in respect of the Third
Lynch Loan Quote; and
e. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the Third Lynch Loan
Quote, and the documents referred to in paragraph 25.d above.
27. In answer to paragraph 27, the respondents:
a. admit that on 27 October 2012, the applicant signed a document entitled 'Loan
Contract’, pursuant to which he offered to enter into a loan contract with CC
Personal Finance on the terms and conditions set out in that document (Third
Lynch Contract Form);
b. admit that the Third Lynch Contract Form provided that the annual percentage
rate which applied was 48.00%;
49799279
17
c. repeat paragraph 25.d and the particulars of paragraph 25 in respect of the Third
Lynch Contract Form; and
d. otherwise deny the paragraph and rely on the full terms of the Third Lynch
Contract Form, and the documents referred to in paragraph 25.d above.
27A. In answer to paragraph 27A, the respondents deny that paragraph and say that on or
around 27 October 2012, a credit proposal was prepared in respect of the Third Lynch
Loan that addressed the matters pleaded in paragraphs 27A(a) - 27A(d) of the Second
Further Amended Statement of Claim and say that the credit proposal was generated
from the Safrock System and not the Mon-e System.
27B. The respondents admit paragraph 27B.
28. In answer to paragraph 28, the respondents:
a. admit that the applicant received $810 representing the 'Amount of credit’ defined
in the Third Lynch Contract Form;
b. otherwise deny paragraph 28; and
c. further say that CC Personal Finance remitted:
i. an amount of $88.50 to Cash Converters Goodna, comprising the Third
Lynch Brokerage Fee less an amount payable by Cash Converters
Goodna to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic bank transfer,
as part of a payment in or around November 2012; and
ii. an amount of $121.50 to CCPL, comprising an amount payable by Cash
Converters Goodna to CCPL in respect of a licence fee, by electronic
bank transfer, as part of a payment in or around November 2012.
E. BREACH OF THE OLD CODE BY SAFROCK WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICANT
29. In answer to paragraph 29, the respondents:
a. admit that the First Lynch Contract Form was, upon execution by Safrock, a
contract within the meaning of Schedule 1 of the Old Code (Executed First
Lynch Contract Form);
Particulars
49799279
18
An employee of Safrock (being one of the employees referred to in
the particulars to paragraph 16) caused the First Lynch Contract
Form to be executed by Safrock by inserting the electronic signature
of Peter Wessels, on or around 26 August 2010 following receipt of
the First Lynch Contract Form signed by the applicant.
b. admit that the Executed First Lynch Contract Form formed part of the credit
contract between the applicant and Safrock within the meaning of section 5 of the
Qld Code;
c. deny that the First Lynch Appointment of Broker formed part of the credit contract
between the applicant and Safrock because:
i. Safrock was the credit provider and was not party to the First Lynch
Appointment of Broker;
ii. Cash Converters Goodna did not provide the credit and was not the credit
provider;
iii. Cash Converters Goodna, as the broker, provided services to the
applicant for a fee and the brokerage arrangement between the applicant
and Cash Converters Goodna was separate to the credit contract
between the applicant and Safrock and formed no part of it; and
d. otherwise deny paragraph 29.
30. The respondents deny paragraph 30, repeat their response to paragraph 29 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision in the credit contract between the applicant and Safrock within the
meaning of section 5 of the Qld Code; and
b. the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under the credit
contract within the meaning of section 32(4) of the Qld Act and therefore did not
have to be included in calculating the annual percentage rate; and49799279
19
c. the applicant was entitled to pay the First Lynch Brokerage Fee to Cash
Converters Goodna separately.
31. The respondents deny paragraph 31, repeat their response to paragraph 29 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision of the credit contract between the applicant and Safrock within the
meaning of section 5 of the Old Code;
b. the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a fee or charge exceeding the amount
that may be charged consistently with the Old Code; and
c. the interest charge under the credit contract between the applicant and Safrock
did not exceed the amount that may be charged consistently with the Old Code
because:
i. the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under the
credit contract within the meaning of clause 3 of the Old Regs; and
ii. therefore did not have to be included in calculating the annual percentage
rate under that clause.
32. The respondents deny paragraph 32 and repeat their response to paragraphs 29-31.
33. In answer to paragraph 33, the respondents:
a. deny that the applicant is entitled to the relief claimed in paragraph 33;
b. repeat their response to paragraphs 29-32;
c. say that the Court ought not to exercise its discretion in section 102(2) of the Qld
Code to order that Safrock pay an amount as a civil penalty;
d. rely on section 102(4) of the Qld Code; and
e. otherwise deny paragraph 33.
Particulars
49799279
20
In respect of paragraph 33(d),* the respondents refer to the particulars to
paragraph 35.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery, the issue of subpoenas
and notices to produce and the trial of common issues.
F. CONTRAVENTION OF THE ASIC ACT BY SAFROCK WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICANT
34. The respondents admit paragraph 34.
35. In answer to paragraph 35, the respondents:
a. deny paragraph 35;
b. say that the First Lynch Brokerage Fee was not paid to the respondents but was
paid to Cash Converters Goodna bv Safrock. on the direction of the applicant,
out of the 'Amount of credit’ defined in the First Lvnch Contract Form:
c. deny that the services provided by Cash Converters Goodna to the applicant in
acting as a broker were illusory, and say that the brokerage fee represented
valuable consideration in return for services provided by Cash Converters
Goodna, as follows:
i. Cash Converters Goodna explained Safrock’s money lending products
and the process for obtaining them to the applicant;
ii. Cash Converters Goodna interviewed the applicant to determine whether
he satisfied Safrock’s qualifying criteria;
iii. Cash Converters Goodna took reasonable steps to ensure that any
application forms or other forms associated with a money lending
transaction required by Safrock were properly and legibly completed by
the applicant;
49799279
21
iv. Cash Converters Goodna obtained information and documentation
required by Safrock in order to consider the applicant’s eligibility for a
money lending product, including:
1. employment status;
2. income;
3. residential status;
4. bank statements;
5. proof of identity;
6. recent payslips;
7. proof of address; and
8. emergency contact information;
v. Cash Converters Goodna took reasonable steps to ensure that such
information as was provided was true and correct to the best of the belief
of Cash Converters Goodna;
vi. Cash Converters Goodna formed a view in relation to the applicant’s
eligibility for Safrock’s money lending products and made a
recommendation to Safrock that the applicant be considered for one of
such products;
vii. Cash Converters Goodna confirmed the identity of the applicant by
sighting and keeping copies of all documents confirming the applicant’s
identity pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Transactions Reports
Act 1988 (Cth);
viii. Cash Converters Goodna forwarded the applicant’s offer to enter into a
credit contract with Safrock to Safrock, which required Cash Converters
Goodna to, amongst other things:
49799279
22
1. upload documents to Safrock’s website; and
2. mail originals of signed documents to Safrock;
ix. Cash Converters Goodna provided the applicant with the ability to make
an application for a loan product from Safrock at a location convenient to
him, in an environment with which he was familiar, and from an entity with
which and employees with whom he had existing business relationships;
x. the services at paragraphs 35.c.i - 35.c.ix above represented a cost to
Cash Converters Goodna including:
1. the cost of setting up and maintaining processes to provide the
services at paragraphs 35.c.i - 35.c.ix above, and ensuring
ongoing compliance with those processes;
2. the cost of employing and training staff to provide, amongst other
things, the services at paragraphs 35.c.i - 35.c.ix above;
3. the share of operational costs, including the cost and maintenance
of computer and telecommunications hardware, incurred by it in
providing the services at paragraphs 35.c.i - SS.c.ix above; and
4. the cost of creating documentation in relation to the applicant’s
credit contract with Safrock; and
d. rely on section 12CC(1) of the ASIC Act, in particular sub-sections (c), (e), (f),
and (I).
Particulars
In respect of sub-paragraph (c)(ii):
Safrock’s qualifying criteria included that the applicant:
1. be over 18 years of age;
2. be an Australian resident; and
49799279
23
3. have a regular and sufficient income stream to service the
loan.
In respect of sub-paragraphs (c)i - (c)vii:
Licence Agreement between CCPL, Safrock and Cash Converters Goodna
dated 30 July 2008;
Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators (Queensland
and Western Australia)’; and
Document entitled ‘Guidelines for Personal Finance Operators’.
In respect of sub-paragraph (c)ix:
The Applicant resided at Oxley Pines Caravan Park, 82 Kimberley Street,
Durack Queensland 4077.
In addition to the First, Second and Third Lynch Loans, the applicant
obtained:
1. a further loan styled as a ‘Personal Loan' from Cash
Converters Inala;
2. 39 loans styled as ‘Cash Advance’ loans, 10 of which from
Cash Converters Goodna and 12 from Cash Converters Inala;
3. 33 pawnbroking loans from Cash Converters Goodna and 22
pawnbroking loans from Cash Converters Inala; and
4. 1 sale and 1 purchase from Cash Converters Goodna.
In respect of sub-paragraph (d):
The relevant employee of Cash Converters Goodna provided copies of
relevant documents concerning the loan to the applicant prior to the loan
application being made, and the applicant was apparently able to understand
those documents.
49799279
24
The terms on which the applicant acquired the First Lynch Loan were
substantially the same as the terms on which he would have acquired an
equivalent loan from a person other than Safrock.
Safrock’s conduct was consistent with its conduct in the provision of similar
loans to individuals in similar circumstances to the applicant.
Safrock acted in good faith in connection with the First Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue of
subpoenas and notices to produce.
36. In answer to paragraph 36, the respondents:
a. repeat their response to paragraph 35;
b. deny that the applicant suffered any loss or damage;
c. say that the provision of money lending products using the brokerage fee model
was adopted by other commercial providers of money lending products in
Queensland; and
d. otherwise deny paragraph 36.
Particulars
If the applicant had sought to borrow funds of a similar amount, it is likely the
loan would have been on substantially similar terms as the First Lynch
Loan.A substantially similar model to the brokerage fee model was adopted
by Cash Store Australia Holdings Inc, City Finance (Brisbane) Pty Ltd and
Spot Loans Pty Ltd, commercial providers of money lending products in
Queensland in or around the same time as the First Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following evidence, discovery and the
issue of subpoenas and notices to produce.
49799279
25
G. BREACH OF THE OLD CODE BY CC PERSONAL FINANCE WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICANT AND THE SECOND LYNCH LOAN
37. In answer to paragraph 37, the respondents:
a. admit that the Second Lynch Contract Form was, upon execution by CC
Personal Finance, a contract within the meaning of Schedule 1 of the Qld.Code
(Executed Second Lynch Contract Form);
Particulars
An employee of CC Personal Finance (being one of the employees
referred to in the particulars to paragraph 20) caused the Second
Lynch Contract Form to be executed by CC Personal Finance by
inserting the electronic signature of Peter Wessels, on or around 1
June 2012 following receipt of the Second Lynch Contract Form
signed by the applicant.
b. admit that the Executed Second Lynch Contract Form formed part of the credit
contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance within the meaning of
section 5 of the Old Code;
c. deny that the Second Lynch Appointment of Broker or the Second Lynch Loan
Quote formed part of the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal
Finance because:
i. CC Personal Finance was the credit provider and was not party to the
Second Lynch Appointment of Broker or the Second Lynch Loan Quote;
ii. Cash Converters Inala did not provide the credit and was not the credit
provider;
iii. Cash Converters Inala, as the broker, provided services to the applicant
for a fee and the brokerage arrangement between the applicant and Cash
Converters Inala was separate to the credit contract between the
applicant and CC Personal Finance and formed no part of it; and49799279
26
d. otherwise deny paragraph 37.
38. The respondents deny paragraph 38, repeat their response to paragraph 37 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision in the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance
within the meaning of section 5 of the Qld Code;
b. the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under the
credit contract within the meaning of section 32(4) of the Qld Act and therefore
did not have to be included in calculating the annual percentage rate; and
c. the applicant was entitled to pay the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee to Cash
Converters Inala separately.
39. The respondents deny paragraph 39, repeat their response to paragraph 37 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision of the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance
within the meaning of section 5 of the Qld Code;
b. the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a fee or charge exceeding the amount
that may be charged consistently with the Qld Code; and
c. the interest charge under the credit contract between the applicant and CC
Personal Finance did not exceed the amount that may be charged consistently
with the Qld Code because:
i. the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under
the credit contract within the meaning of clause 3 of the Qld Regs; and
ii. therefore did not have to be included in calculating the annual percentage
rate under that clause.
40. The respondents deny paragraph 40 and repeat their response to paragraphs 37-39.
49799279
27
41. In answer to paragraph 41, the respondents:
a. deny that the applicant is entitled to the relief claimed in paragraph 41;
b. repeat their response to paragraphs 37-40;
c. say that the Court ought not to exercise its discretion in section 102(2) of the Qld
Code to order that CC Personal Finance pay an amount as a civil penalty;
d. rely on section 102(4) of the Qld Code; and
e. otherwise deny paragraph 41.
Particulars
In respect of paragraph 41(d), the respondents refer to the particulars to
paragraph 35, as applicable to the Second Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery, the issue of subpoenas
and notices to produce and the trial of common issues.
H. CONTRAVENTION OF THE ASIC ACT BY CC PERSONAL FINANCE WITH REGARD TO
THE APPLICANT AND THE SECOND LYNCH LOAN
42. The respondents admit paragraph 42.
43. As to paragraph 43, the respondents:
a. deny paragraph 43;
b. say that the Second Lynch Brokerage Fee was not paid to the respondents but
was paid to Cash Converters Inala bv CC Personal Finance, on the direction of
the applicant, out of the ‘Amount of credit’ defined in the Second Lvnch Contract
Form:
c. deny that services provided by Cash Converters Inala to the applicant as a
broker were illusory, and say that the brokerage fee represented valuable
consideration in return for services provided by Cash Converters Inala, as
follows:
49799279
28
i. Cash Converters Inala explained CC Personal Finance’s money lending
products and the process for obtaining them to the applicant;
ii. Cash Converters Inala interviewed the applicant to determine whether he
satisfied CC Personal Finance’s qualifying criteria;
iii. Cash Converters Inala took reasonable steps to ensure that any
application forms or other forms associated with a money lending
transaction required by CC Personal Finance were properly and legibly
completed by the applicant;
iv. Cash Converters Inala obtained information and documentation required
by CC Personal Finance in order to consider the applicant’s eligibility for a
money lending product, including:
1. employment status;
2. income;
3. residential status;
4. bank statements;
5. proof of identity;
6. recent payslips;
7. proof of address; and
8. emergency contact information;
v. Cash Converters Inala took reasonable steps to ensure that such
information as was provided was true and correct to the best of the belief
of Cash Converters Inala;
vi. Cash Converters Inala formed a view in relation to the applicant’s
eligibility for CC Personal Finance’s money lending products and made a
49799279
29
recommendation to CC Personal Finance that the applicant be
considered for one of such products;
vii. Cash Converters Inala confirmed the identity of the applicant by sighting
and keeping copies of all documents confirming the applicant’s identity
pursuant to the provision of the Financial Transactions Reports Act 1988
(Cth);
viii. Cash Converters Inala forwarded the applicant’s offer to enter into a
credit contract with CC Personal Finance to CC Personal Finance, which
required Cash Converters Inala to, amongst other things:
1. upload documents to CC Personal Finance’s website; and
2. mail originals of signed documents to CC Personal Finance,
ix. Cash Converters Inala provided the applicant with the ability to make an
application for a loan product from CC Personal Finance at a location
convenient to him, in an environment with which he was familiar, and from
an entity with which and employees with whom he had existing business
relationships;
x. the services at paragraphs 43.c.i - 43.c.ix above represented a cost to
Cash Converters Inala including:
1. the cost of setting up and maintaining processes to provide the
services at paragraphs 43.c.i - 43.c.ix, and ensuring ongoing
compliance with those processes;
2. the cost of employing and training staff to provide, amongst other
things, the services at paragraphs 43.c.i - 43.c.ix above;
3. the share of operational costs, including the cost and maintenance
of computer and telecommunications hardware, incurred by it in
providing the services at paragraphs 43.c.i -43.c.ix above; and
49799279
30
4. the cost of creating documentation in relation to the applicant’s
credit contract with CC Personal Finance; and
d. rely on section 12CC(1) of the ASIC Act, in particular sub-sections (c), (e), (f),
and (I).
Particulars
The respondents refer to the particulars to paragraph 35, as applicable to the
Second Lynch Loan.
Document entitled ‘Personal Finance Centre Policies and Procedures’ dated
22 February 2011.
Further particulars will be provided following evidence, discovery and the issue
of subpoenas and notices to produce.
44. In answer to paragraph 44, the respondents:
a. repeat their response to paragraph 43;
b. deny that the applicant suffered any loss or damage;
c. say that the provision of money lending products using the brokerage fee model
was adopted by other commercial providers of money lending products in
Queensland; and
d. otherwise deny paragraph 44.
Particulars
If the applicant had sought to borrow funds of a similar amount, it is likely the
loan would have been on substantially similar terms as the Second Lynch Loan.
A substantially similar model to the brokerage fee model was adopted by Cash
Store Australia Holdings Inc, City Finance (Brisbane) Pty Ltd and Spot Loans Pty
Ltd, commercial providers of money lending products in Queensland in or around
the same time as the Second Lynch Loan.
49799279
31
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue of
subpoenas and notices to produce.
I. BREACH OF THE OLD CODE BY CC PERSONAL FINANCE WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICANT AND THE THIRD LYNCH LOAN
45. In answer to paragraph 45, the respondents:
a. admit that the Third Lynch Contract Form was, upon execution by CC Personal
Finance, a contract within the meaning of Schedule 1 of the Old Code (Executed
Third Lynch Contract Form);
Particulars
An employee of CC Personal Finance (being one of the employees
referred to in the particulars to paragraph 25) caused the Third Lynch
Contract Form to be executed by CC Personal Finance by inserting
the electronic signature of Peter Wessels, on or around 27 October
2012, following receipt of the Third Lynch Contract Form signed by
the applicant.
b. admit that the Executed Third Lynch Contract Form formed part of the credit
contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance within the meaning of
section 5 of the Old Code;
c. deny that the Third Lynch Appointment of Broker or the Third Lynch Loan Quote
formed part of the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal
Finance because:
i. CC Personal Finance was the credit provider and was not party to the
Third Lynch Appointment of Broker or the Third Lynch Loan Quote;
ii. Cash Converters Goodna did not provide the credit and was not the credit
provider; and
49799279
32
iii. Cash Converters Goodna, as the broker, provided services to the
applicant for a fee and the brokerage arrangement between the applicant
and Cash Converters Goodna was separate to the credit contract
between the applicant and CC Personal Finance and formed no part of it;
and
d. otherwise deny paragraph 45.
46. The respondents deny paragraph 46, repeat their response to paragraph 45 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision in the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance
within the meaning of section 5 of the Old Code;
b. the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under the credit
contract within the meaning of section 32(4) of the Old Act and therefore did not
have to be included in calculating the annual percentage rate; and
c. the applicant was entitled to pay the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee to Cash
Converters Goodna separately.
47. The respondents deny paragraph 47, repeat their response to paragraph 45 and further
say that:
a. the provision for the payment of the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a
provision of the credit contract between the applicant and CC Personal Finance
within the meaning of section 5 of the Old Code;
b. the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a fee or charge exceeding the amount
that may be charged consistently with the Qld Code; and
c. the interest charge under the credit contract between the applicant and CC
Personal Finance did not exceed the amount that may be charged consistently
with the Qld Code because:
49799279
33
i. the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not a credit fee and charge under the
credit contract within the meaning of clause 3 of the Qld Regs; and
ii. therefore did not have to be included in calculating the annual percentage
rate under that clause.
48. The respondents deny paragraph 48 and repeat their response to paragraphs 45-47.
49. In answer to paragraph 49, the respondents:
a. deny that the applicant is entitled to the relief claimed in paragraph 49;
b. repeat their response to paragraphs 45-48;
c. say that the Court ought not to exercise its discretion in section 102(2) of the Qld
Code to order that CC Personal Finance pay an amount as a civil penalty;
d. rely on section 102(4) of the Qld Code; and
e. otherwise deny paragraph 49.
Particulars
In respect of paragraph 49(d), the respondents refer to the particulars to
paragraph 35, as applicable to the Third Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery, the issue of subpoenas
and notices to produce and the trial of common issues.
J. CONTRAVENTION OF THE ASIC ACT BY CC PERSONAL FINANCE WITH REGARD TO
THE APPLICANT AND THE THIRD LYNCH LOAN
50. The respondents admit paragraph 50.
51. As to paragraph 51, the respondents:
a. deny paragraph 51;
b. say that the Third Lynch Brokerage Fee was not paid to the respondents but was
paid to Cash Converters Goodna bv CC Personal Finance, on the direction of the
applicant, out of the ‘Amount of credit’ defined in the Third Lvnch Contract Form:
49799279
34
c. deny that the services provided by Cash Converters Goodna to the applicant in
acting as a broker were illusory, and say that the brokerage fee represented
valuable consideration in return for services provided by Cash Converters
Goodna as follows:
i. Cash Converters Goodna explained CC Personal Finance’s lending
products and the process for obtaining them to the applicant;
ii. Cash Converters Goodna interviewed the applicant to determine whether
he satisfied CC Personal Finance’s qualifying criteria;
iii. Cash Converters Goodna took reasonable steps to ensure that any
application forms or other forms associated with a money lending
transaction required by CC Personal Finance were properly and legibly
completed by the applicant;
iv. Cash Converters Goodna obtained information and documentation
required by CC Personal Finance in order to consider the applicant’s
eligibility for a money lending product, including:
1. employment status;
2. income;
3. residential status;
4. bank statements;
5. proof of identity;
6. recent payslips;
7. proof of address; and
8. emergency contact information;
v. Cash Converters Goodna took reasonable steps to ensure that such
information as was provided was true and correct to the best of the belief
of Cash Converters Goodna;
vi. Cash Converters Goodna formed a view in relation to the applicant’s
eligibility for CC Personal Finance’s money lending products and made a
49799279
35
recommendation to CC Personal Finance that the applicant be
considered for one of such products;
vii. Cash Converters Goodna confirmed the identity of the applicant by
sighting and keeping copies of all documents confirming the applicant’s
identity pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Transactions Reports
Act 1988 (Cth);
viii. Cash Converters Goodna forwarded the applicant’s offer to enter into a
credit contract with CC Personal Finance to CC Personal Finance, which
required Cash Converters Goodna to, amongst other things:
1. upload documents to CC Personal Finance’s website; and
2. mail originals of signed documents to CC Personal Finance;
ix. Cash Converters Goodna provided the applicant with the ability to obtain
CC Personal Finance’s money lending product at a location convenient to
him, in an environment with which he was familiar, and from an entity with
which and employees with whom he had existing business relationships;
x. the services provided at paragraphs 51 .c.i - 51 .c.ix above represented a
cost to Cash Converters Goodna including:
1. the cost of setting up and maintaining processes to provide the
services at paragraphs 51 .c.i - 51 .c.ix above, and ensuring
ongoing compliance with those processes;
2. the cost of employing and training staff to provide, amongst other
things, the services at paragraphs 51 .c.i - 51 .c.ix above;
3. the share of operational costs, including the cost of computer and
telecommunications hardware, incurred by it in providing the
services at paragraphs 51.c.i - 51.c.ix above; and
4. the cost of creating documentation in relation to the applicant’s
credit contract with CC Personal Finance; and
49799279
36
d. rely on section 12CC(1) of the ASIC Act, in particular sub-sections (c), (e), (f) and
(!)■
Particulars
The respondents refer to the particulars to paragraph 35, as applicable to
the Third Lynch Loan.
Document entitled 'Personal Finance Centre Policies and Procedures’
dated 28 September 2011.
Further particulars will be provided following evidence, discovery and the
issue of subpoenas and notices to produce.
52. In answer to paragraph 52, the respondents:
a. repeat their response to paragraph 51;
b. deny that the applicant suffered any loss or damage;
c. say that the provision of money lending products using the brokerage fee model
was adopted by other commercial providers of money lending products in
Queensland; and
d. otherwise deny paragraph 52.
Particulars
If the applicant had sought to borrow funds of a similar amount, it is likely the
loan would have been on substantially similar terms as the Third Lynch Loan.
A substantially similar model to the brokerage fee model was adopted by Cash
Store Australia Holdings Inc, City Finance (Brisbane) Pty Ltd and Spot Loans Pty
Ltd, commercial providers of money lending products in Queensland in or around
the same time as the Third Lynch Loan.
Further particulars will be provided following discovery and the issue of
subpoenas and notices to produce.
K. CLAIMS OF GROUP MEMBERS
53. The respondents do not know and cannot admit paragraph 53.
53A. In answer to paragraph 53A, the respondents:
49799279
37
a. say that before on or around 3 October 2011, Group Members were not provided
with a “Credit Proposal” document; and
b. otherwise admit paragraph 53A.
54. The respondents repeat paragraphs 29-32, 35, 37-40, 43, 45-48 and 51 above and
otherwise deny paragraph 54.
55. In answer to paragraph 55, the respondents:
a. deny that the Group Members are entitled to the relief pleaded in paragraph 55;
b. repeat paragraphs 33, 41 and 49 above;
c. say that the Court ought not to exercise its discretion in section 102(2) of the Old
Code to order that the respondents pay an amount as a civil penalty;
d. rely on section 102(4) of the Old Code; and
e. otherwise deny paragraph 55.
56. The respondents repeat paragraphs 36, 44 and 52 above and otherwise deny that the
Group Members are entitled to the relief pleaded in paragraph 56.
Date: 23....Qst6b6r-2Q4714 June 2018
Signed by Peter Butler AM RFD Lawyer for the Respondents
This second further amended pleading was settled by Elizabeth Collins SC, Sera
Mtfzabeg+afilmtiaz Ahmed and Chris McMeniman of counsel.
49799279
38
Certificate of lawyer
I Peter Butler certify to the Court that, in relation to the defence filed on behalf of the
Respondent, the factual and legal material (including the judgment of the Court in this matter
dated 19 December 2016) available to me at present provides a proper basis for:
(a) each allegation in the pleading; and
(b) each denial in the pleading; and
(c) each non admission in the pleading.
Date: 23-Qeteber 204^14 June 2018
Signei , DLawyer for the Respondents
49799279
39
Schedule
No. NSD900 of 2015Federal Court of Australia
District Registry: New South Wales
Division: General
Respondents
Second Respondent: Safrock Finance Corporation (Qld) Pty Ltd ACN 098 566 520
46188565