north carolina management commission/e… · c d-4 appendix cd – 4 yadkin river basin model...
TRANSCRIPT
CD-4 APPENDIX CD – 4
Yadkin River Basin
Model Reference Files 4.1 – Yadkin-Pee Dee Model Logic and
Verification Report
4.2 – Summary – Yadkin-Pee Dee Water Supply
Projections Basis and Results
4.3 – Yadkin Water Supply Analysis – Legend
4.4 - Yadkin Water Supply Analysis – Modeling
Projections by YRWSP Alternative
4.5 - Yadkin Water Supply Analysis – Entity-
Specific Projection Detail Sheets
4.6 - Yadkin Water Supply Analysis – Union
County Projection Inputs by YRWSP
Alternative
CD-4.1 APPENDIX CD – 4.1
Yadkin-Pee Dee Model
Logic and Verification
Report
H-2
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
Prepared for:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
Charlotte, North Carolina
UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Monroe, North Carolina
Prepared by:
HDR ENGINEERING, INC. OF THE CAROLINAS
Charlotte, North Carolina
August 2014
H-3
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC i Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page No.
LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................. VIII
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1
2.0 PROJECT DATA ............................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 W. Kerr Scott Project ................................................................................................ 2-2
2.2 High Rock Development .......................................................................................... 2-2
2.3 Tuckertown Development ........................................................................................ 2-2
2.4 Narrows Development .............................................................................................. 2-3
2.5 Falls Development .................................................................................................... 2-3
2.6 Tillery Development ................................................................................................. 2-4
2.7 Blewett Falls Development ....................................................................................... 2-4
2.8 Hydrology ................................................................................................................. 2-5
2.8.1 Proration ....................................................................................................... 2-7
2.8.2 Hind-casting of Historical Water Use ........................................................... 2-9
2.8.3 Unimpaired Inflow Development ............................................................... 2-12
2.9 CHEOPS Model Logic Enhancements ................................................................... 2-14
3.0 HISTORICAL BASELINE ................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1 Model Logic .............................................................................................................. 3-1
3.2 Model Scenario Definition/Input Data ..................................................................... 3-3
3.2.1 System Data .................................................................................................. 3-3
3.2.1.1 Load Shapes and Energy Values .................................................... 3-3
3.2.1.2 Carry-Over Elevations Condition ................................................... 3-5
3.2.1.3 Forecast Set-Up Condition ............................................................. 3-5
3.2.2 Physical Data ................................................................................................ 3-6
3.2.2.1 Reservoir Storage/Area Curves ...................................................... 3-6
3.2.2.2 Monthly Evaporation .................................................................... 3-10
3.2.2.3 Tailwater Data .............................................................................. 3-12
3.2.2.4 Spillway Capacity ........................................................................ 3-14
3.2.2.5 Plant Operation Type ................................................................... 3-17
3.2.3 Operational Data ......................................................................................... 3-18
3.2.3.1 Spill and Minimum Elevations ..................................................... 3-18
3.2.3.2 Flashboards ................................................................................... 3-19
3.2.3.3 Target Elevations .......................................................................... 3-20
3.2.3.4 Water Withdrawals ....................................................................... 3-21
H-4
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section Title Page No.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC ii Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.3.5 Minimum Flows ........................................................................... 3-22
3.2.3.6 Maximum Flows .......................................................................... 3-22
3.2.3.7 Reservoir Fluctuation Limits ........................................................ 3-22
3.2.4 Generation Data .......................................................................................... 3-22
3.2.4.1 Headloss Coefficients ................................................................... 3-23
3.2.4.2 Turbine Efficiency Curves ........................................................... 3-24
3.2.4.3 Generator Efficiency Curve ......................................................... 3-30
3.2.4.4 Wicket Gate Leakage ................................................................... 3-35
3.2.4.5 Powerhouse Weekend Operations ................................................ 3-35
3.2.4.6 Maintenance ................................................................................. 3-36
4.0 MODEL CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION PROCESS .................................................. 4-1
4.1 Summary of Modeled Results versus Historical Data .............................................. 4-2
4.1.1 Model Historical Baseline ............................................................................ 4-2
4.1.2 Scenario Verification2001 .......................................................................... 4-14
5.0 MODEL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................. 5-1
5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 5-1
5.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 5-1
6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 6-1
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A – REFERENCE GAGE HIND-CASTED WATER USE
APPENDIX B – WATER USE BY RESERVOIR BASIN
H-5
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC iii Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page No.
1-1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP. ........................................................................................... 1-2
2-1 PROJECT SCHEMATIC. .................................................................................................. 2-6
2-2 HIGH ROCK DEVELOPMENT OPERATING GUIDE. ............................................... 2-17
3-1 CHEOPS MODEL EXECUTION FLOW CHART ........................................................... 3-1
3-2 CHEOPS MODEL SCHEDULING FLOW CHART ........................................................ 3-2
3-3 W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE ...................... 3-7
3-4 HIGH ROCK RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE .............................. 3-7
3-5 TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE ......................... 3-8
3-6 NARROWS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE ................................. 3-8
3-7 FALLS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE ........................................ 3-9
3-8 TILLERY RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE .................................... 3-9
3-9 BLEWETT FALLS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE ................... 3-10
3-10 HIGH ROCK POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES
OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS ............................................................................... 3-24
3-11 TUCKERTOWN POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 TURBINE
EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS .................................................... 3-25
3-12 NARROWS POWERHOUSE UNITS 1, 2, AND 4 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES
OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS ............................................................................... 3-25
3-13 NARROWS POWERHOUSE UNIT 3 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE
OF NET HEADS .............................................................................................................. 3-26
3-14 FALLS POWERHOUSE UNIT 1 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF
NET HEADS .................................................................................................................... 3-26
3-15 FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 2 AND 3 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A
RANGE OF NET HEADS ............................................................................................... 3-27
3-16 TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 AND 3 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A
RANGE OF NET HEADS ............................................................................................... 3-27
H-6
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure Title Page No.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC iv Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3-17 TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNIT 2 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE
OF NET HEADS .............................................................................................................. 3-28
3-18 TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNIT 4 TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE
OF NET HEADS .............................................................................................................. 3-28
3-19 BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 TURBINE
EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS .................................................... 3-29
3-20 BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 4 THROUGH 6 TURBINE
EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS .................................................... 3-29
4-1 MODELED AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT DAILY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-3
4-2 MODELED AND HISTORICAL HIGH ROCK MONTHLY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-4
4-3 MODELED AND HISTORICAL TUCKERTOWN MONTHLY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-5
4-4 MODELED AND HISTORICAL NARROWS MONTHLY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-6
4-5 MODELED AND HISTORICAL FALLS MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION
COMPARISON .................................................................................................................. 4-7
4-6 MODELED AND HISTORICAL TILLERY MONTHLY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-8
4-7 MODELED AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT FALLS MONTHLY RESERVOIR
ELEVATION COMPARISON .......................................................................................... 4-9
4-8 MODELED AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT DISCHARGE COMPARISON .. 4-12
4-9 MODELED AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT FALLS DEVELOPMENT
DISCHARGE COMPARISON ........................................................................................ 4-13
4-10 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT PROJECT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-16
4-11 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL HIGH ROCK PROJECT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-17
H-7
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure Title Page No.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
4-12 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 HISTORICAL TUCKERTOWN DEVELOPMENT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-18
4-13 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL NARROWS DEVELOPMENT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-19
4-14 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL FALLS PROJECT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-20
4-15 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL TILLERY PROJECT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-21
4-16 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT FALLS PROJECT
OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 4-22
4-17 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT PROJECT
DISCHARGE COMPARISON ........................................................................................ 4-24
4-18 MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT PROJECT
DISCHARGE COMPARISON ........................................................................................ 4-25
H-8
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC vi Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page No.
2-1 YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER BASIN - MODELED SYSTEM ......................................... 2-1
2-2 DRAINAGE AREA OF EACH FACILITY ...................................................................... 2-1
2-3 POTENTIAL REFERENCE GAGES ................................................................................ 2-9
3-1 LOAD SHAPE ................................................................................................................... 3-4
3-2 FREE WATER SURFACE EVAPORATION ................................................................ 3-11
3-3 EVAPORATIVE LOSS COEFFICIENTS ...................................................................... 3-12
3-4 TUCKERTOWN POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE ........................... 3-13
3-5 TILLERY POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE ...................................... 3-13
3-6 BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE ....................... 3-14
3-7 W. KERR SCOTT SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ................................................. 3-14
3-8 HIGH ROCK SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ......................................................... 3-15
3-9 TUCKERTOWN SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ................................................... 3-15
3-10 NARROWS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ........................................................... 3-16
3-11 FALLS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ................................................................... 3-16
3-12 TILLERY SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES .............................................................. 3-17
3-13 BLEWETT FALLS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ............................................... 3-17
3-14 RESERVOIR SPILL AND MINIMUM ELEVATIONS ................................................ 3-19
3-15 BLEWETT FALLS FLASHBOARD SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES ................... 3-20
3-16 GUIDE CURVE TARGET ELEVATIONS OF APGI RESERVOIRS ......................... 3-21
3-17 HEADLOSS COEFFICIENTS ........................................................................................ 3-23
3-18 HIGH ROCK UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ............. 3-30
3-19 TUCKERTOWN UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ....... 3-31
3-20 NARROWS UNITS 1, 2, AND 4 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ..................... 3-31
3-21 NARROWS UNIT 3 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ........................................ 3-32
3-22 FALLS UNIT 1 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ................................................ 3-32
H-9
YADKIN–PEE DEE BASIN
OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY
MODEL LOGIC AND VERIFICATION REPORT
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table Title Page No.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC vii Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3-23 FALLS UNITS 2 AND 3 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ................................. 3-33
3-24 TILLERY UNITS 1, 3, AND 4 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ........................ 3-33
3-25 TILLERY UNIT 2 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ............................................ 3-34
3-26 BLEWETT FALLS UNITS 1 THROUGH 3 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ... 3-34
3-27 BLEWETT FALLS UNITS 4 THROUGH 6 GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE ... 3-35
4-1 HISTORICAL BASELINE: GENERATION COMPARISON ...................................... 4-10
4-2 MODEL VERIFICATION2001: STATION DISCHARGE COMPARISON ............... 4-15
H-10
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC viii Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
LIST OF ACRONYMS
A&I agricultural and irrigation
AGR Annual Growth Rate
APGI Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.
cfs cubic feet per second
CHEOPS™ Computerized Hydro Electric Operations Planning Software
CSA Comprehensive Settlement Agreement
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FWS free water surface
GIS Geographic Information Systems
IBT inter-basin transfers
LIP low inflow protocol
Model Yadkin–Pee Dee CHEOPS Model
msl mean sea level
NCDWR North Carolina Department of Water Resources
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NWS National Weather Service
POR period of record
RM river mile
UIF unimpaired inflow
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USGS United States Geological Survey
H-11
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC ES-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Duke Energy and Union County contracted with HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR)
to update an existing operations model of the Yadkin–Pee Dee Basin in North Carolina. The
existing water quantity / hydro operations model was developed to support the Yadkin–Pee Dee
Hydroelectric Project (No. 2206) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing
using HDR’s proprietary CHEOPS™ (Computerized Hydro Electric Operations Planning
Software) platform and included the six hydroelectric developments on the Yadkin–Pee Dee
River from High Rock reservoir through Blewett Falls reservoir, all in North Carolina.
CHEOPS is specifically designed to evaluate the effects of operational changes and physical
modifications at multi-development hydroelectric projects. The model, as developed for
relicensing, included the Duke Energy-owned Yadkin-Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project, FERC No.
2206, which includes the Tillery and Blewett Falls Developments, and the upstream Alcoa
Power Generating, Inc. (APGI)-owned Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 2197, which
includes the High Rock, Tuckertown, Narrows, and Falls Developments. The relicensing
operations model has been updated to include the most-upstream reservoir, W. Kerr Scott, owned
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The seven aforementioned Duke Energy,
APGI, and USACE facilities are collectively referred to as “the system.” This expanded model
is intended to be used as a tool to assist in evaluating water quantity distribution between the
seven reservoirs due to changes in model inputs including various operational modifications and
possible inter-basin transfers (IBT). This will be performed by reviewing relative change
between proposed operational modifications within the system.
This report characterizes the development and verification of the customized Yadkin–Pee Dee
CHEOPS Model (Model) by loading the physical and operational parameters specific to the
system. The operating logic for seven reservoirs has been added based on existing and future
station operating plans in accordance with information provided by Duke Energy, APGI, and
publically available W. Kerr Scott data. Operating logic is a single set of rules per scenario and
does not account for changes in external conditions for a single model run. A model calibration
and validation process has been developed for the period of 1997-2003, applying the basic law of
H-12
Executive Summary
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC ES-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
mass continuity between the reservoirs. The period was selected based on the completion of all
reservoirs and the best available records of constant plant operation and reservoir elevations. A
significant portion of the work for the operation model development included the calculation of
unimpaired inflow hydrology for the system. The unimpaired inflow (UIF) data for the system
was generated from United States Geological Survey (USGS) reported historical flows and
estimated historical water use data. A simulation model is a decision support tool and is not
intended to simulate or predict exact future conditions on a daily or annual basis. The operations
model was constructed to compare different scenarios by reviewing relative changes between
proposed operational modifications within the system. This is done using historic inflows (i.e.,
UIF) to simulate likely future conditions, as if the inflow will occur in the same pattern in the
future as occurred in the past.
Development of the Yadkin–Pee Dee Model was based on input and physical characteristics of
each hydro facility previously developed for the same river basin as part of the Yadkin–Pee Dee
Hydroelectric Project FERC relicensing and updated over time as information became available
(Progress Energy 2006).
Using average daily inflow as input, the Model simulates operations to budget water between
reservoirs (nodes) so that all constraints (physical, environmental, and operational) are met while
maximizing peak period hydro turbine energy as a lower priority objective. This model allows
for user-defined customization of specific constraints within the system, such as flow
requirements, target reservoir elevations, powerhouse equipment constraints, and water
withdrawals and returns.
The purpose of this report is to document inputs and assumptions used in the development of the
Model, to demonstrate the model reasonably characterizes operations of the two Duke Energy,
four APGI, and single USACE facilities modeled, and to demonstrate the model is adequate for
use in evaluating the effects of alternative scenarios.
H-13
Executive Summary
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC ES-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Model verification is intended to validate the input data and ability of the programmed logic in
simulating daily hydroelectric and reservoir operations. HDR performed model verification by
comparing actual and model-estimated generation and discharge. The verification simulations
were completed for relatively recent hydrologic years with best available historical reservoir
operations over a wide range of hydrologic and reservoir operations conditions.
The Model is coded to run day-to-day operations based on a single set of operating conditions or
rules. Actual project operations generally follow the operating rules; however, human
intervention periodically deviates from the general operating rules to accommodate day-to-day
realities such as equipment failure and maintenance, changing hydrologic conditions, power
demands, and other factors.
The verification was performed using historical operations data provided by Duke Energy,
APGI, and the USACE. Verification scenarios were developed to test the facility operation rules
in an attempt to replicate daily human decision making with respect to typical operating
requirements of the system. Verification of the Model was completed using two different
scenarios (model runs). The first model run performs a verification of the model input data,
logic, and conditions of the Historical Baseline scenario for calendar years 1997 through 2003.
In addition to the Historical Baseline scenario, a second verification scenario was developed to
simulate the detailed operations for calendar year 2001.
In the opinion of HDR, verification results show the operations model and the hydrologic inputs
compare favorably to historical data, reasonably characterize system operations, and are
appropriate for use in evaluating the effects of alternative operating scenarios on generation,
reservoir levels, and outflows. The CHEOPS software and the Yadkin–Pee Dee Model are tools
that, as this report demonstrates, can be successfully used to evaluate the relative sensitivity and
response of the system modeled to changing operational constraints. As with any model,
accuracy is highly dependent on input data; consequently, model results should be viewed in a
relative, rather than an absolute, context.
H-14
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 1-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy and Union County contracted with HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR)
to update an existing operations model of the Yadkin–Pee Dee Basin in North Carolina. The
existing water quantity / hydro operations model was developed to support the Yadkin–Pee Dee
Hydroelectric Project (No. 2206) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing
using HDR’s proprietary CHEOPS™ (Computerized Hydro Electric Operations Planning
Software) platform and included the six hydroelectric developments on the Yadkin–Pee Dee
River from High Rock reservoir through Blewett Falls reservoir, all in North Carolina.
CHEOPS is specifically designed to evaluate the effects of operational changes and physical
modifications at multi-development hydroelectric projects. The model, as developed for
relicensing, included the Duke Energy-owned Yadkin-Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project, which
includes the Tillery and Blewett Falls Developments, and the upstream Alcoa Power Generating,
Inc. (APGI)-owned Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 2197, which includes the High
Rock, Tuckertown, Narrows, and Falls Developments. The relicensing operations model has
been updated to include the most-upstream reservoir, W. Kerr Scott, owned by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). The seven aforementioned Duke Energy, APGI, and USACE
facilities are collectively referred to as “the system.” This expanded Yadkin–Pee Dee CHEOPS
Model (Model) is intended to be used as a tool to assist in evaluating water quantity distribution
between the seven reservoirs due to changes in model inputs including various operational
modifications and possible inter-basin transfers (IBT). This will be performed by reviewing
relative change between proposed operational modifications within the system. A project
location map of the seven aforementioned Duke Energy, APGI, and USACE facilities,
collectively referred to as “the system,” is provided in Figure 1-1.
CHEOPS is specifically designed to evaluate the effects of operational changes and physical
modifications at multi-development hydroelectric projects. CHEOPS has been applied to
evaluate the physical and operational changes considered during the FERC relicensing of more
than 25 projects. The Yadkin–Pee Dee Model of the system (minus W. Kerr Scott), was applied
throughout the FERC relicensing process for the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No.
2206).
H-15
Section 1 Introduction
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 1-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 1-1
PROJECT LOCATION MAP. 1
1 Exhibit A, Figure A-1, Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206): Application for License. April 2006.
H-16
Section 1 Introduction
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 1-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
HDR created the CHEOPS hydropower system simulation model as a tool for evaluating a wide
range of physical changes (e.g., turbine upgrades) and operational constraints (e.g., minimum
flows). One of the many strengths of the CHEOPS model is the degree of customization each
individual model contains. The model is tailored to meet the demands of the particular system
being modeled. The Model was custom-configured for the system based on the specific system
constraints such as flow requirements, target reservoir elevations, and powerhouse equipment
constraints.
The original Yadkin–Pee Dee Model was based on a Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 platform. For
increased performance, the model has since been updated to Microsoft .NET Framework in
Visual Basic. As previously indicated, the relicensing model did not include the W. Kerr Scott
Reservoir. The Model has since been updated to include W. Kerr Scott operational logic. The
newer “Build” of the CHEOPS software provides additional logic support for the low inflow
protocol (LIP) as outlined in the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement (CSA), (Progress Energy
2007).
The Model utilizes daily flows, plant-generating characteristics, and operating criteria of the
system to simulate operation, allocate flow releases, and calculate energy production within the
system. The Model calculates reservoir elevation, headlosses, net head, turbine discharge and
spill, and power generation in 15-minute increments. The Model is designed for long-term
analysis of the effects of operational and physical changes made to the modeled hydro/reservoir
system.
Model verification is intended to validate the input data and ability of the programmed logic in
simulating daily hydroelectric and reservoir operations. A “Historical Baseline” scenario was
established following the historic system-wide operation rules outlined in the model verification
process. HDR performed model verification using comparisons of actual and model-estimated
generation and total discharge from each reservoir. The verification simulations were completed
for recent hydrologic years with best available historical reservoir operations over a wide range
of hydrologic and reservoir operations conditions. The purpose of this report is to document
H-17
Section 1 Introduction
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 1-4 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
inputs and assumptions used in the development of the Model, to demonstrate that the model
reasonably characterizes operations of the seven facilities modeled, and to demonstrate the
model is adequate for use in evaluating the effects of alternative operating scenarios (varying
water use).
The Model is coded to run day-to-day operations based on a single set of operating conditions or
rules. Actual project operations generally follow the operating rules; however, human
intervention periodically deviates from the general operating rules to accommodate day-to-day
realities such as equipment failure and maintenance, changing hydrologic conditions, power
demands, and other factors. In addition to differences between modeled operations versus actual
operations that include human interventions, there are also inherent discrepancies due to input
data inaccuracies (e.g., differences in calculated hydrology data, turbine or generator efficiencies,
or reservoir storage curves). It is important to understand model results will never completely
match historical or future operations due to these differences between actual operating conditions
and modeled conditions.
H-18
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
2.0 PROJECT DATA
Duke Energy owns and operates the Yadkin–Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project, FERC No 2206
(consisting of the Tillery Development and the Blewett Falls Development); APGI owns and
operates the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 2197 (consisting of the High Rock
Development, Tuckertown Development, Narrows Development, and the Falls Development);
the USACE owns and operates the W. Kerr Scott Project. Each facility is linked in series within
the Model and consists of dams and multi-unit powerhouses as shown in Table 2-1. Table 2-2
provides the drainage area of each of the facilities.
TABLE 2-1
YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER BASIN - MODELED SYSTEM
Facility Upstream Reservoir Project Type
W. Kerr Scott –– Non-Generating
High Rock W. Kerr Scott Conventional Hydro
Tuckertown High Rock Conventional Hydro
Narrows Tuckertown Conventional Hydro
Falls Narrows Conventional Hydro
Tillery Falls Conventional Hydro
Blewett Falls Tillery Conventional Hydro
TABLE 2-2
DRAINAGE AREA OF EACH FACILITY
Facility Drainage Area
(mi2)
Blewett Falls 6,839
Tillery 4,600
Falls 4,190
Narrows 4,180
Tuckertown 4,080
High Rock 3,973
W. Kerr Scott 367
H-19
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
2.1 W. Kerr Scott Project
W. Kerr Scott Dam is located on the Yadkin River approximately five river miles (RM) upstream
of Wilkesboro, NC. The dam is about 55 miles west of Winston-Salem, NC and about 65 miles
north of Charlotte, NC. W. Kerr Scott Dam is an earthen structure having a top elevation of
1,107.5 ft. above mean sea level (msl) and an overall length of 1,750 ft. The watershed covers
parts of Wilkes, Caldwell, and Watauga counties. The normal pool elevation of W. Kerr Scott
reservoir is 1,030 ft. msl, and there is approximately 41,000 acre-feet of storage at the normal
pool elevation. The drainage area above W. Kerr Scott Dam is 367 square miles. The W. Kerr
Scott project is authorized for the purposes of flood control, water supply, recreation, and fish
and wildlife. (USACE 2014). There is no power generation at the project. Water releases are
made from a controlled outlet structure.
2.2 High Rock Development
The Yadkin River flows out of the W. Kerr Scott Dam and flows through approximately
132 miles of a riverine reach into and through High Rock Lake. The High Rock Development is
located in Davidson, Davie, and Rowan counties, North Carolina. High Rock Dam is a concrete
gravity structure comprised of two short non-overflow sections, a Stoney gate-controlled
spillway section, and an integral intake/powerhouse section. The drainage area above High Rock
Dam is 3,973 square miles. The dam impounds High Rock Reservoir, which has an available
storage capacity of approximately 217,400 acre-feet at the normal full pool elevation of 623.9 ft.
msl, based on a drawdown of 30 ft. High Rock Reservoir extends upstream about 19 miles to
Yadkin North Fork and Hanna’s Ferry, and at full pool elevation, the reservoir has a surface area
of approximately 15,180 acres. The High Rock powerhouse contains three vertical Francis
turbines, each operating under a net head of approximately 55.0 ft. (APGI 2006).
2.3 Tuckertown Development
The Tuckertown Development is located in Davidson, Montgomery, Rowan, and Stanly
counties, North Carolina. Tuckertown Dam consists of a rockfill embankment section, an
earthfill embankment section, three non-overflow concrete gravity sections, a Tainter gate
H-20
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
spillway section, and an integral intake/powerhouse. The drainage area above Tuckertown Dam
is 4,080 square miles and impounds approximately 6,700 acre-feet at the normal full pool
elevation of 564.7 ft. msl, based on a drawdown of 3 ft. The Tuckertown powerhouse contains
three Kaplan turbines, each operating under a net head of approximately 53.5 ft. (APGI 2006).
2.4 Narrows Development
The Narrows Development is located in Davidson, Montgomery, and Stanly counties, North
Carolina. Narrows Dam consists of a main dam section and a bypass spillway section. The main
dam section is a concrete gravity structure that consists of a non-overflow gravity section, a
Tainter gate-controlled spillway section, a Stoney gate side channel spillway structure, a trash
gate section, an intake section, a downstream powerhouse, and four steel penstocks. The
drainage area above Narrows Dam is 4,180 square miles and impounds approximately 129,100
acre-feet at the normal full pool elevation of 509.8 ft. msl, based on a drawdown of 31.1 ft. The
Narrows powerhouse contains four vertical Francis turbines, each operating under a net head of
approximately 174.5 ft. (APGI 2006).
2.5 Falls Development
The Falls Development is located in Montgomery and Stanly counties, North Carolina. Falls
Dam is a concrete gravity structure. The development consists of a non-overflow gravity
section, a Stoney gate-controlled spillway section, a Tainter gate-controlled spillway section, a
trash gate section, and an integral intake/powerhouse section. The drainage area above Falls
Dam is 4,190 square miles and impounds approximately 760 acre-feet at the normal full pool
elevation of 332.8 ft. msl, based on a drawdown of 4 ft. The Falls powerhouse contains one
S. Morgan Smith vertical Francis turbine unit (Unit 1) and two Allis Chalmers propeller-type
turbine units (Units 2 and 3), each operating under a net head of approximately 54.0 ft.
(APGI 2006).
H-21
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-4 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
2.6 Tillery Development
The Tillery Development is located in Montgomery and Stanly counties, four miles west of
Mount Gilead, North Carolina. Tillery Dam (also known as Norwood Dam) consists of
approximately 1,200 ft of earthen embankment and 1,550 ft of concrete gravity structures. The
Tillery Dam creates the impoundment known as Lake Tillery. The drainage area above Tillery
Dam is approximately 4,600 square miles. The impoundment extends approximately 16 miles to
the tailwater of APGI’s Falls Development. At the normal maximum reservoir elevation of
278 ft. msl, Lake Tillery impounds approximately 84,150 acre-feet of usable storage. The
Tillery powerhouse contains three Francis turbines and one fixed-blade propeller turbine, each
operating under a net head of approximately 70.0 ft. The powerhouse also contains a small
Francis auxiliary turbine for driving a “house generator.” (Progress Energy 2006).
2.7 Blewett Falls Development
Outflows from the Tillery Development flow into Blewett Falls Lake after passing through a 19-
mile riverine reach of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River. The Blewett Falls Dam and powerhouse are
located at river mile 188, approximately 15 miles upstream of the North Carolina-South Carolina
state line. The Blewett Falls Development consists of a concrete gravity ogee-crested spillway
with 4-ft wooden flashboards and easterly and westerly earthen embankments. The concrete
spillway crest is approximately at elevation 176 ft. msl. The drainage area above Blewett Falls
Dam is approximately 6,839 square miles. At the normal maximum reservoir elevation of 178 ft.
msl, Blewett Falls Reservoir impounds approximately 30,893 acre-feet of usable storage,
corresponding to 17 ft of drawdown. The Blewett Falls powerhouse contains six generating
units, each operating under a net head of approximately 47.0 ft. Each generator is driven by two
identical hydraulic turbines operating in tandem. Each turbine consists of two runners; therefore,
each unit contains four separate runners. This configuration is referred to as a “quad-runner”
alignment. Each of the 12 hydraulic turbines, manufactured by S. Morgan Smith, is of a
horizontal-shaft, double-opposed runner, single-discharge configuration. (Progress Energy
2006).
H-22
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-5 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
2.8 Hydrology
A significant input to the Model is a reconstructed inflow data set unimpaired by system
operations (unimpaired inflow [UIF]), subdivided by reservoir node for each of the seven
reservoirs included in the Model. This section describes the development of hydrology data for
the Yadkin River extending from the W. Kerr Scott Project to Blewett Falls Dam.
The headwaters of the Yadkin-Pee Dee River originate in the Blue Ridge Mountains of north-
central North Carolina. The river flows east-southeast through the Piedmont region of central
North Carolina, and then into the Uwharrie Lakes region where the Projects are located
(Figure 1-1). Below the Blewett Falls plant, the Pee Dee River flows another 188 miles through
the upper and lower Coastal Plain region before it reaches the Atlantic Ocean at Winyah Bay
near Georgetown, South Carolina. A schematic of the system is shown in Figure 2-1. (Progress
Energy 2006). Water losses in the system due to reservoir evaporation are estimated as part of
the model simulation following the logic outlined in Section 3.2.2.2.
The unimpaired hydrology was estimated by means of proration of the streamflow data from
reference basins. The proration method estimates unimpaired flows for a region of interest by
utilizing one or more reference basins with available representative data. The proration method
gives an estimate of unimpaired flows for a given watershed of interest by scaling the reference
basin as follows:
Where: Qtarget is the flow (cubic feet per second [cfs]) for the basin of interest,
Qreference is the flow (cfs) for the reference basin,
Atarget is the drainage area (square miles) for the basin of interest,
Areference is the drainage area (square miles) for the reference basin.
reference
reference
target
target QA
AQ
H-23
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-6 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 2-1
PROJECT SCHEMATIC. 2
2 Exhibit B, Figure B-3, Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206): Application for License. April 2006.
H-24
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-7 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Drainage areas were taken directly from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) records where
available, or by using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based calculations; drainage areas
and river miles are shown in Figure 2-1.
2.8.1 Proration
Proration requires at least one reference basin with reliable data sources of sufficient duration,
and a hydrology that is reasonably similar to the hydrology of the basin of interest. The
reference basin(s) should be similar in basin characteristics to the basin of interest, it should have
good streamflow data for a sufficiently long period of record, and, if possible, an unimpaired
hydrology to begin with or a minimally impaired hydrology to minimize cumulative errors
associated with gage summations. If the unimpaired flow data for the reference watershed is
reasonably accurate, then the proration method is very effective when applied to watersheds with
similar physical characteristics (e.g., climate, topography, elevation, geology). However, as the
physical characteristics of the watershed of interest deviate from that of the reference watershed,
the prorated unimpaired flow data will include deviations that are related to the degree of
differences in watershed characteristics. This was accounted for by selecting a drainage basin
with similar physical characteristics as the basin of interest; in this case, sub-basins of the larger
basin of interest.
The development of reference hydrographs for the system began with a compilation of the
available USGS gages in the vicinity of the area of interest (Table 2-3).
This list of gages was reviewed for applicability based on the period of record, drainage area
size, productivity (cfs/square mile), and accuracy of the gage. The color-coding provided in
Table 2-3 shows the first step in the process of searching for a reference basin based on initial
screening selection criteria. The three initial screening methodologies are described below:
■ Period of Record – The period of record (POR) identified of interest was 1/1/1955
through 12/31/2013. Gages were considered for exclusion that did not extend back
through 1955, or which did not extend through 2013.
H-25
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-8 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
■ Productivity – Historical operation records were evaluated to determine approximate
basin productivity for each basin of interest. This was then compared to the productivity
of potential reference gages to determine gages with significantly different productivity.
■ Gage Accuracy - The USGS reports the gage locations were plotted on an isohyets map of
the average annual precipitation in inches/year for the years of 1961 to 1990. This enabled
the identification of gages with significantly different precipitation characteristics.
From the initial comprehensive list of all gages in the basin, the gages noted in Table 2-3 were
selected as possible data sources for the development of hydrology for the system. These gages
were then filtered according to the color coding in Table 2-3. The result was 8 gages were
identified as reference gages for the system. These gages were selected for each basin of interest
based on proximity and productivity. The USGS gages 02120780 and 02125000 were combined
to create a single record (02120780 for the period 4/1/1979 through 12/31/2013 and 02125000
for the period 1/1/1955 through 3/31/1979).
H-26
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-9 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 2-3
POTENTIAL REFERENCE GAGES
Gage Drainage Area
(mi2)
Start Date End Date
02111000 YADKIN RIVER AT PATTERSON, NC 29 10/1/1939 Present
02111180 ELK CREEK AT ELKVILLE, NC 51 10/1/1965 Present
02111500 REDDIES RIVER AT NORTH WILKESBORO,
NC
90 10/1/1939 Present
02112120 ROARING RIVER NEAR ROARING RIVER,
NC
128 4/1/1964 Present
02112360 MITCHELL RIVER NEAR STATE ROAD, NC 79 4/1/1964 Present
02113850 ARARAT RIVER AT ARARAT, NC 231 4/1/1964 Present
02114450 LITTLE YADKIN RIVER AT DALTON, NC 43 8/1/1960 Present
02118000 SOUTH YADKIN RIVER NEAR
MOCKSVILLE, NC
306 10/1/1938 Present
02118500 HUNTING CREEK NEAR HARMONY, NC 155 1/1/1951 Present
02121500 ABBOTTS CREEK AT LEXINGTON, NC 174 10/1/1988 Present
02120780 SECOND CREEK NEAR BARBER, NC 118 4/1/1979 Present
02125000 BIG BEAR CR NR RICHFIELD, NC 56 4/1/1954 9/30/2010
02126000 ROCKY RIVER NEAR NORWOOD, NC 1,372 10/1/1929 Present
02128000 LITTLE RIVER NEAR STAR, NC 106 4/1/1954 Present
02133500 DROWNING CREEK NEAR HOFFMAN, NC 183 10/1/1939 Present
2113000 FISHER RIVER NEAR COPELAND, NC 128 10/1/1931 9/30/2010
212414900 MALLARD CREEK BELOW STONY CREEK 35 10/1/2007 Present
Legend For Table 2-3:
Short Period of Record / No Recent Hydrology
USGS Reports Some Records Poor
2.8.2 Hind-casting of Historical Water Use
As part of the model development and verification, historical water use data was developed for
each of the entities in the Yadkin River Basin (Basin) study area. Historical water use data from
1997 through 2012 was compiled for each of the entities. As part of the development of
unimpaired flows, hind-casted water use data from 1955 through 1996 in cfs was developed for
those entities located upstream of the identified potential USGS stream gages. The historical and
hind-casted water uses were added back (withdrawals as positive values and returns as negative
H-27
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-10 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
values) to the reported daily USGS flows to create daily average unimpaired reference flows in
cfs. Monthly hind-casted and historical water uses are presented in Appendix A.
The types of water use entities evaluated for this effort were grouped into the following major
categories:
Public Water Supplies and Wastewater Utilities – Municipal and other utility agencies
with systems that withdraw and treat water for public consumption and residential,
commercial, and industrial use, as well as those systems that treat wastewater and return
it to a surface water source.
Direct Industrial – These industrial users have direct withdrawals and/or returns from
surface water sources and utilize water in their manufacturing processes.
Thermal-Electric Power – The thermal-electric power facilities within the Basin that use
water for cooling and other energy production needs.
Agricultural and Irrigation – Agricultural and irrigation (A&I) users include farms, golf
courses, and other facilities that use water for livestock production, irrigation, and other
purposes.
The following describes the basis for developing the historical data for each of the categories
outlined above:
Public Water Supplies and Wastewater Utilities – Historical monthly withdrawal and
return data from 1997 and 2002 through 2012 was provided by the North Carolina
Department of Water Resources (NCDWR). The data from 1998 through 2001 was
calculated using straight-line interpolation. For the hind-casting calculations from 1955
through 1996, the withdrawals and returns were based on the prior year’s flows and
assumed that the historical water use followed the county population Annual Growth
Rate (AGR) derived from the U.S. Census data for that decade.
H-28
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-11 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Direct Industrial – Historical monthly withdrawal and return data from 1997 and 2002
through 2102 was provided by the NCDWR. The data from 1998 through 2011 was
calculated using straight-line interpolation. For the hind-casting calculations from 1955
through 1996, the withdrawals and returns were based on the average of the known flows
from 1997 through 2012 for a given month.
Thermal-Electric Power – The historical data from 1997 through 2012 was provided by
Duke Energy, who has the only Thermal Electric Power plants in the Basin study area.
Hind-casting was not performed, as none of these facilities was located upstream of the
stream gages of interest.
Agricultural and Irrigation – Agricultural and Irrigation use was calculated using
historical data from the USGS in five-year increments from 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005
for North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The data include crop, livestock, and
golf withdrawals. A&I water withdrawals were assumed to be completely consumptive
and, for a given county, consumed uniformly over that county’s land area. To develop
the withdrawals, the percentage of a county’s land area within a particular reservoir’s
watershed was assumed to be commensurate with the percentage of that county’s total
A&I water withdrawal taken from that watershed. In performing these calculations, it
was determined that the A&I water use reported in the USGS database varies
considerably between reporting years, and no definitive trend in water use exists.
Therefore, the greatest water withdrawal from the 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005 USGS
datasets was selected as the county water use for all historical A&I consumption. For
each category (crop, livestock, and golf), these values were multiplied by the percentage
of each county that lies within the basin. A monthly coefficient was established for the
A&I water withdrawals to account for irrigation use trends during the irrigation season of
each year. North Carolina Agricultural Use Data from 2009-2011 was used from the
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Data for irrigation
and livestock withdrawals, not including aquaculture, was used. The monthly coefficient
was developed by taking the 2009 through 2011 average monthly withdrawals divided by
the total average yearly withdrawals for those years.
H-29
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-12 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
2.8.3 Unimpaired Inflow Development
The unimpaired reference gage flows were selected and applied to develop estimated unimpaired
inflows to each basin of interest as follows:
W. Kerr Scott – USGS 02111000 Yadkin River at Patterson, NC and 02111500 Reddies
River at North Wilkesboro, NC were selected as the reference gages for the W. Kerr
Scott basin. Due to productivity, the unimpaired Yadkin River gage flows were prorated
following the proration method outlined in Section 2.8 to equate to a drainage area of
276 square miles. The prorated unimpaired Yadkin River flows were then added to the
unimpaired Reddies River gage flows (89.2 square miles) to develop the final W. Kerr
Scott unimpaired inflows.
High Rock Incremental (High Rock Dam to Outlet of W. Kerr Scott Dam) – USGS
02118500 Hunting Creek near Harmony, NC, 02118000 South Yadkin River near
Mocksville, NC and 02128000 Little River near Star, NC were selected as the reference
gages for the High Rock incremental basin. The unimpaired reference flows were
prorated to the High Rock incremental drainage area of 3,608 square miles assuming the
following:
{[(
) (
) (
)] }
o Where: Qtarget is the flow (cfs) for the High Rock Incremental basin,
o Atarget is the drainage area (square miles) for the basin of interest
o Qreference1 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02118500 basin,
o Areference1 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02118500 basin,
o Qreference2 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02118000 basin,
o Areference2 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02118000 basin,
o Qreference3 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02128000 basin,
o Areference3 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02128000 basin.
H-30
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-13 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Tuckertown Incremental (Tuckertown Dam to Outlet of High Rock Dam) – USGS
02120780 Second Creek near Barber, NC filled in with 02125000 Big Bear Creek near
Richfield, NC was selected as the reference gage for the Tuckertown incremental basin.
The unimpaired reference gage flows were prorated following the proration method
outlined in Section 2.8 to equate to the Tuckertown incremental drainage area of
107 square miles.
Narrows Incremental (Narrows Dam to Outlet of Tuckertown Dam) – USGS
02120780 Second Creek near Barber, NC filled in with 02125000 Big Bear Creek near
Richfield, NC was selected as the reference gage for the Narrows incremental basin. The
unimpaired reference gage flows were prorated following the proration method outlined
in Section 2.8 to equate to the Narrows incremental drainage area of 100 square miles.
Falls Incremental (Falls Dam to Outlet of Narrows Dam) – USGS 02120780 Second
Creek near Barber, NC filled in with 02125000 Big Bear Creek near Richfield, NC was
selected as the reference gage for the Falls incremental basin. The unimpaired reference
gage flows were prorated following the proration method outlined in Section 2.8 to
equate to the Falls incremental drainage area of 10 square miles.
Tillery Incremental (Tillery Dam to Outlet of Falls Dam) – USGS 02118000 South
Yadkin River near Mocksville, NC was selected as the reference gage for the Tillery
incremental basin. The unimpaired reference gage flows were prorated following the
proration method outlined in Section 2.8 to equate to the Tillery incremental drainage
area of 410 square miles.
Blewett Falls Incremental (Blewett Falls Dam to Outlet of Tillery Dam) – USGS
02118500 Hunting Creek near Harmony, NC, 02126000 Rocky River near, NC, and
02128000 Little River near Star, NC were selected as the reference gages for the Blewett
Falls incremental basin. The unimpaired reference flows were prorated to the Blewett
Falls incremental drainage area of 2,239 square mile assuming the following:
{[(
) (
) (
)] }
o Where: Qtarget is the flow (cfs) for the High Rock Incremental basin,
o Atarget is the drainage area (square miles) for the basin of interest
H-31
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-14 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
o Qreference1 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02118500 basin,
o Areference1 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02118500 basin,
o Qreference2 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02126000 basin,
o Areference2 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02126000 basin,
o Qreference3 is the flow (cfs) for the unimpaired 02128000 basin,
o Areference3 is the drainage area (square miles) for the 02128000 basin.
2.9 CHEOPS Model Logic Enhancements
Enhancements made to the CHEOPS platform to support the Model include functionality
enabling simulation of conditions such as the LIP, which was developed during the FERC
relicensing process for the Yadkin and Yadkin–Pee Dee Hydroelectric Projects. The LIP was
simulated for future scenarios only, as it did not apply to historical operations.
Additionally, the model has been custom configured to accommodate the High Rock Operating
Guide. River flows to Duke Energy’s Tillery and Blewett Falls developments are largely
dependent on releases from APGI’s Yadkin Hydroelectric Project. Flow releases from APGI’s
Yadkin Hydroelectric Project to Duke Energy’s Tillery Development are governed by a FERC-
approved agreement between the parties. This agreement requires APGI to operate in a manner
that allows Duke Energy to meet its continuous flow requirements at Tillery and Blewett Falls.
Yadkin’s seasonal operations are managed in accordance with a “rule curve” that guides the
operation of High Rock Lake.3 From the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206):
Initial Consultation Document, September 2002, the operating guide is as follows:
The High Rock operating guide is presented in Figure 2.7-1. (Figure 2.7-1 is referenced below
in this report as Figure 2-2). It should be noted that this figure presents reservoir elevation in
terms of drawdown (in feet, right vertical axis) and depletion (in day-second-feet, left vertical
3 Exhibit A, Section 2.2, Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206): Application for License. April 2006.
H-32
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-15 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
axis). The High Rock operating guide regulates energy generation, not headwater. The
following "rules" are applied to the guide to determine generation values:
Rule 1: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by Line 1 or
if, during the next calendar week, the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is expected to be
greater than indicated by Line 1, generate 32,088 MWh, maximum, (191,000 kW
average) each week unless spill is anticipated. If spill is anticipated, generation should
be at maximum practicable rate.
Rule 2: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by Line 2,
but less than that indicated by Line 1, generate 27,313 MWh maximum, (162.6 MW
average), each week.
Rule 3: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by Line 3,
but less than that indicated by Line 2, generate 21,583 MWh maximum, (128.5 MW
average), each week.
Rule 4: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by line 4,
but less than that indicated by Line 3, generate 16,044 MWh maximum, (95.5 MW
average), each week.
Rule 5: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by Line 5,
but less than that indicated by Line 4, generate 11,084 MWh maximum, (66.0 MW
average), each week.
Rule 6: If the elevation at High Rock Reservoir is greater than that indicated by line 6,
but less than that indicated by Line 5, generate 8,522 MWh maximum, (50.7 MW
average), each week.
Rule 7: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is greater than 623.9 feet, but less than
that indicated by Line 6, generate approximately 6,000 MWh each week to sustain a
minimum release of 1800 cfs (35.7 MW) average weekly.
H-33
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-16 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Rule 8:
a) March 6 through May 13: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is less than
that indicated by Line 7, limit the discharge through High Rock turbines to
1500 cfs, average for the period.
b) May 14 through July 29: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is less than
that indicated by Line 7, limit the discharge though High Rock turbines to
1610 cfs, average for the period.
c) July 30 through September 15: If the elevation of High Rock Reservoir is less
than that indicated by Line 7, limit the discharge through High Rock turbines to
1400 cfs, average for the period.
Note: In the event of conflict between Rule 8 and the other rules, Rule 8 will take
precedence.
H-34
Section 2 Project Data
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 2-17 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 2-2
HIGH ROCK DEVELOPMENT OPERATING GUIDE. 4
4 Figure 2.7-1, Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206): Initial Consultation Document. September 2002.
H-35
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.0 HISTORICAL BASELINE
This section defines the development of the Historical Baseline scenario used for the verification
of the Model. Each sub-section defines specific inputs used in the Model verification to simulate
historical operations.
3.1 Model Logic
Figures 3-1 and 3-2 give an overview of the model logic in sequence.
FIGURE 3-1
CHEOPS MODEL EXECUTION FLOW CHART
Text files are created and stored
in model directories
Output Generated (text files):
Daily summaries and/or Detailed
schedules
Create Conditions needed for
new Scenario
Create Settings needed for new
Scenario
Create new Scenario
Run new Scenario(s)
Select the type of Run to make:
Energy or Rule Curve
Model Executes using data of
selected Scenario (see following
page)
Steps to create a
new Scenario
Create Components if needed for
new Conditions
View Output and create summary
charts and tables
Select hydrologic period to
include in model run
CHEOPS™ Model Execution Flow Chart
Text files are created and stored
in model directories
Output Generated (text files):
Daily summaries and/or Detailed
schedules
Create Conditions needed for
new Scenario
Create Settings needed for new
Scenario
Create new Scenario
Run new Scenario(s)
Select the type of Run to make:
Energy or Rule Curve
Model Executes using data of
selected Scenario (see following
page)
Steps to create a
new Scenario
Create Components if needed for
new Conditions
View Output and create summary
charts and tables
Select hydrologic period to
include in model run
CHEOPS™ Model Execution Flow Chart
H-36
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-2
CHEOPS MODEL SCHEDULING FLOW CHART
Determine "Optimal" Detailed
Discharge Schedule.
Determine Daily Discharge Volume
(Average Daily Discharge)
Determine Inflows (Detailed and
Total Volume)
Check for Elevation
Constraint ViolationsYes
Make adjustments to the detailed
discharge schedule of current
and/or upstream plant
Calculate Spill (if any)
No
Calculate Energy
Calculate Detailed reservoir
elevatoins
CHEOPS™ Scheduling Flow Chart
elevations
H-37
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2 Model Scenario Definition/Input Data
The project data listed in the following subsections shows the general operational constraints and
physical parameters used in the Model to define the current system configuration used in the
Historical Baseline and the Verification2001 scenario setup. Model verification uses historical
data and tests the ability of the model to simulate actual operations of all seven facilities. To
represent historical operations, the Historical Baseline and Verification2001 scenarios presented
in this report are based on the Yadkin–Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project FERC Licensing Baseline
scenario, with the additions outlined below:
• W. Kerr Scott Project and Operations
• 1955 – 2013 hydrologic dataset as outlined in Section 2.8.
• Reservoir Area Estimates, outlined in Section 3.2.2.1
• Reservoir Evaporation, outlined in Section 3.2.2.2
• Water Use, outlined in Section 3.2.3.4
• Estimated unit performance at the four APGI-owned developments, Section 3.2.4
• Additionally, Verification2001 includes reservoir target elevations to reflect reported
historical end-of-week elevations for calendar year 2001.
Sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.4 are organized following the four components (System Data,
Physical Data, Operational Data, and Generation Data) used in the Model to define the current
system configuration for both the Historical Baseline and the Verification2001 scenario setups.
3.2.1 System Data
3.2.1.1 Load Shapes and Energy Values
This section contains the load shape and energy value data common to all six generating
facilities on the Yadkin River. The Model load shape defines the daily schedule of relative
power pricing and the hour durations of each price in the peak, off-peak, and shoulder periods.
The load shape and energy value data common to all six generating facilities on the Yadkin
River is presented in Table 3-1. The model uses the load shape data to schedule the release of
water throughout the day, prioritizing generation during peak periods. Durations for load shape
periods and dollar values for the weekday load shape periods were provided by Progress Energy
as part of the Yadkin–Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project FERC relicensing.
H-38
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-4 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-1
LOAD SHAPE
Month
Weekday Durations in Hours Weekday Power Values in Dollars
Morning
Off-Peak
Morning
Secondary
Peak
Morning
Peak
Afternoon
Secondary
Peak
Afternoon
Peak
Evening
Secondary
Peak
Evening
Off-Peak Off-Peak
Secondary
Peak Peak
Jan 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
Feb 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
Mar 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
Apr 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
May 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Jun 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Jul 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Aug 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Sep 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Oct 8 0 8 0 8 0 0 70 50 25
Nov 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
Dec 6 0 8 3 7 0 0 70 50 25
Month
Weekend Durations in Hours Weekend Power Values in Dollars
Morning
Off-Peak
Morning
Peak
Afternoon
Off-Peak Afternoon Peak
Evening
Off-Peak Off-Peak Peak
Jan 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Feb 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Mar 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Apr 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
May 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Jun 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Jul 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Aug 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Sep 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Oct 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Nov 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
Dec 10 8 0 0 6 60 30
H-39
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-5 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.1.2 Carry-Over Elevations Condition
The Model Carry-Over Elevations Condition controls how to treat the beginning- and end-of-
year elevations. The model begins the run on January 1 of the start year with each reservoir at its
target elevation. If the scenario is run for a multiple-year period, then the model can either start
subsequent years with the reservoirs at the target elevations or at the end of previous year
elevations.
The Carry-Over Elevations is selected (the checkbox is checked) in this model. Therefore, the
model will carry-over the end-of-year elevations to the next year, and reservoirs will start the
next year at the ending elevations of the previous year.
3.2.1.3 Forecast Set-Up Condition
The Model Forecast Set-Up Condition requires two inputs: a number of forecast days and an
accuracy of the forecast. The number of days is how many days the model looks ahead in the
inflow file to calculate how much water the system is going to receive. The model is set up to
look 1 day ahead with 100 percent accuracy. Since the model has “perfect” forecasting as it
looks at the actual inflow file, the accuracy setting allows the user to adjust the model’s ability to
forecast accurately. The accuracy setting adjusts inflow by a fixed multiple. The model looks
ahead the given number of days, adds up the inflows, multiplies those inflows by the entered
accuracy value, then schedules releases based on this forecasted inflow volume. If the accuracy
setting is not 100 percent (1), then the forecasted volume is not accurate. By running the model
with 90 percent (0.9) accuracy, and then running again at 110 percent (1.1) accuracy, the user
can simulate operations where the operator has an ability to forecast inflows with plus or minus
10 percent accuracy.
H-40
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-6 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.2 Physical Data
3.2.2.1 Reservoir Storage/Area Curves
The Reservoir Storage Curve is a tabulated link between the reservoir elevation and reservoir
volume. The elevations are in units of “feet” and the volumes are in “acre-feet.” The Model
uses this curve to calculate elevations based on inflows and model-determined releases.
Reservoir storage curves were obtained from the Yadkin Hydroelectric Project Application for
License (APGI 2006), Yadkin–Pee Dee River Project Application for License (Progress Energy
2006) and the W. Kerr Scott website (USACE 2014).
The Reservoir Area Curve is a tabulated link between the reservoir elevation and reservoir
surface area. The elevations are in units of “feet” and the areas are in “acres.” The Model uses
this curve only to calculate the surface area based on the simulated reservoir elevation and uses
this data for computing evaporation losses. The surface area curve for W. Kerr Scott was
obtained from W. Kerr Scott website (USACE 2014). Surface area curves for each of the six
hydropower developments reservoirs were estimated based on the reservoir volume. These
estimates were made by dividing the incremental change in volume by the change in elevation.
In instances where smoothing of the surface area curve was required, values were selected to
provide a large surface area. This approach of calculating the reservoir area based on the
incremental change in volume results in a conservative estimate of the approximate reservoir
surface area and, therefore, provides a conservative assessment of total evaporative losses. This
approach is based purely on the incremental change in storage and may not reflect the actual
surface area at any given elevation.
Figures 3-3 through 3-9 show the reservoir area curves used in the model.
H-41
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-7 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-3
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
FIGURE 3-4
HIGH ROCK RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
H-42
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-8 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-5
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
FIGURE 3-6
NARROWS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
H-43
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-9 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-7
FALLS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
FIGURE 3-8
TILLERY RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
H-44
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-10 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-9
BLEWETT FALLS RESERVOIR STORAGE/AREA VOLUME CURVE
3.2.2.2 Monthly Evaporation
Evaporation is based upon a monthly varying coefficient that defines the evaporative loss per
reservoir. Evaporation for each of the seven reservoirs was estimated by means of adjusting
published annual Free Water Surface (FWS) (i.e., shallow lake evaporation with negligible heat
storage) evaporation data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA)
Technical Report NWS 33 (TR-33) to monthly evaporation for each of the project sites (NOAA
1982a). The adjustment of evaporation data requires a reference site with a reliable data source
of National Weather Service (NWS) Class A pan evaporation data located in an area with
reasonably similar climatology. In other words, the reference sites climatic characteristics
should be similar to the area of interest. For the seven project sites in the Yadkin–Pee Dee basin,
the monthly Class A pan evaporation data from NOAA’s Technical Report NWS 34 (TR-34)
Chapel Hill 2 W pan located in Chapel Hill, NC was used to convert the annual FWS
evaporation to monthly FWS evaporation (NOAA 1982b). The Chapel Hill 2 W Class A pan
site was selected for two main reasons; its proximity to the seven project sites and because it
H-45
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-11 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
shares the same physiographic region (i.e., Piedmont physiographic region) and the vast majority
of the Yadkin –Pee Dee basin modeled.
FWS evaporation typically closely represents potential evaporations, and it should be noted that
it may differ significantly from actual lake evaporation during a given month due to the change
in heat storage in the lake. During the spring, heat is stored in the waters of a lake, and
generally, the actual lake evaporation is much less than the computed FWS. During the fall, the
stored energy in the lake is released and the actual lake evaporation is much greater than the
FWS evaporation. It is reported that the FWS evaporation can be estimated with reasonable
accuracy. Table 3-2 below summarizes the monthly and annual FWS evaporation for each of the
seven project sites.
TABLE 3-2
FREE WATER SURFACE EVAPORATION
Month
W. Kerr Scott
Evap Loss
(inches)
High Rock
Evap Loss
(inches)
Tuckertown
Evap Loss
(inches)
Narrows
Evap Loss
(inches)
Falls
Evap Loss
(inches)
Tillery
Evap Loss
(inches)
Blewett Falls
Evap Loss
(inches)
Jan 1.12 1.23 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.26 1.28
Feb 1.33 1.47 1.47 1.48 1.48 1.5 1.52
Mar 2.58 2.85 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.91 2.96
Apr 3.5 3.86 3.88 3.89 3.89 3.95 4.01
May 4.04 4.46 4.48 4.5 4.5 4.56 4.63
Jun 4.43 4.89 4.92 4.93 4.93 5 5.08
Jul 4.47 4.94 4.97 4.98 4.98 5.05 5.13
Aug 4.07 4.49 4.52 4.53 4.53 4.59 4.66
Sep 3.23 3.57 3.59 3.6 3.6 3.65 3.7
Oct 2.27 2.51 2.52 2.53 2.53 2.56 2.6
Nov 1.44 1.59 1.59 1.6 1.6 1.62 1.65
Dec 1.03 1.14 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.16 1.18
Annual 33.5 37 37.2 37.3 37.3 37.8 38.4
In order to incorporate the FWS evaporation into the CHEOPS model, the values provided in
Table 3-2 above were converted from inches per month to feet per day per acre. The
corresponding surface area at each project site's full-pond elevation was assumed for this
H-46
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-12 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
conversion. In addition the CHEOPS input coefficients, the average monthly volume of water
being depleted from the system was also calculated by multiplying the surface areas by the FWS
evaporation data; a summary of the CHEOPS input coefficients is provided in Table 3-3.
TABLE 3-3
EVAPORATIVE LOSS COEFFICIENTS
Month
W. Kerr Scott
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
High Rock
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Tuckertown
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Narrows
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Falls
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Tillery
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Blewett Falls
Evap Loss
(ft/acre/day)
Jan 3.01E-03 3.32E-03 3.34E-03 3.35E-03 3.35E-03 3.39E-03 3.44E-03
Feb 3.95E-03 4.36E-03 4.39E-03 4.40E-03 4.40E-03 4.46E-03 4.53E-03
Mar 6.94E-03 7.67E-03 7.71E-03 7.73E-03 7.73E-03 7.83E-03 7.96E-03
Apr 9.72E-03 1.07E-02 1.08E-02 1.08E-02 1.08E-02 1.10E-02 1.11E-02
May 1.09E-02 1.20E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.23E-02 1.24E-02
Jun 1.23E-02 1.36E-02 1.37E-02 1.37E-02 1.37E-02 1.39E-02 1.41E-02
Jul 1.20E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.34E-02 1.34E-02 1.36E-02 1.38E-02
Aug 1.09E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.22E-02 1.22E-02 1.23E-02 1.25E-02
Sep 8.98E-03 9.91E-03 9.97E-03 9.99E-03 9.99E-03 1.01E-02 1.03E-02
Oct 6.11E-03 6.75E-03 6.78E-03 6.80E-03 6.80E-03 6.89E-03 7.00E-03
Nov 3.99E-03 4.40E-03 4.43E-03 4.44E-03 4.44E-03 4.50E-03 4.57E-03
Dec 2.77E-03 3.06E-03 3.08E-03 3.09E-03 3.09E-03 3.13E-03 3.18E-03
3.2.2.3 Tailwater Data
The Tailwater Curve relates the powerhouse tailwater elevation to the facility’s outflow. In
cases where the powerhouse releases directly into a downstream reservoir, the downstream
reservoir’s elevation is used to compute tailwater elevation. The elevation is in units of “feet,”
while the flow is in cubic feet per second, or “cfs.” The tailwater elevation is subtracted from the
reservoir elevation to calculate the gross head used in determining turbine and pump-turbine
hydraulic performance.
W. Kerr Scott is not a generating facility; therefore, the model does not apply the tailwater
elevation in calculations.
H-47
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-13 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
The High Rock powerhouse releases directly into Tuckertown reservoir, so the elevation of
Tuckertown reservoir is the controlling factor for the High Rock tailwater elevation.
Likewise, the Tuckertown, Narrows, and Falls powerhouses release directly into the downstream
reservoirs, Narrows, Falls and Tillery respectively. Therefore, the elevation of Narrows, Falls,
and Tillery reservoirs are the controlling factor for the upstream tailwater elevation computation.
Tuckertown discharges do influence tailwater at high flows and are modeled as outlined in
Table 3-4.
TABLE 3-4
TUCKERTOWN POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE
Stage
(ft. msl) Flow
(cfs) 509.5 0
512 100,000
526 400,000
The Tillery powerhouse tailwater rating curve was supplied by plant operators and is shown in
Table 3-5.
TABLE 3-5
TILLERY POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE
Stage
(ft. msl) Flow
(cfs) 203.13 0
206.13 5,568
207.73 12,000
The Blewett Falls powerhouse tailwater rating curve was supplied by plant operators and is
shown in Table 3-6.
H-48
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-14 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-6
BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE TAILWATER RATING CURVE
Stage
(ft. msl) Flow
(cfs) 123.23 0
124.28 1,248
126.03 3,624
127.73 7,272
3.2.2.4 Spillway Capacity
The Spillway Curve contains the data relating reservoir elevation (feet) and spillway discharge
capacity (cfs). This data allows the model to determine the maximum amount of water that can
be spilled at the current reservoir elevation and is the sum of all spillway conveyances with gates
open to maximum setting. The Model allows for a simple spillway relationship of elevation and
flow; therefore, all spillways, including gates, are modeled as a relationship of elevation and
flow. If the dam has flashboards (Blewett Falls), the Spillway Curve data represents the flow
capacity with the flashboards tripped.
Spillway capacity data for the W. Kerr Scott Project is shown in Table 3-7, derived from the
W. Kerr Scott web site (USACE 2014).
TABLE 3-7
W. KERR SCOTT SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs) 1,075.00 0
1,105.20 199,300
Spillway capacity data for the High Rock Dam is shown in Table 3-8, derived from the Yadkin
Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (APGI 2002).
H-49
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-15 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-8
HIGH ROCK SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs) Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs) Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs)
594.38 0 605.99 63,714 622.54 257,565
595.33 3,026 607.51 78,628 625.02 296,328
597.04 7,015 609.79 98,515 627.11 330,121
598.18 11,991 611.51 116,411 629.20 367,887
599.90 20,946 614.17 146,235 630.92 399,690
601.42 30,893 616.45 173,076 632.82 435,468
603.13 40,842 618.36 197,927 634.53 469,258
604.65 52,776 621.02 231,724 637.00 511,994
Spillway capacity data for the Tuckertown Dam is shown in Table 3-9, derived from the Yadkin
Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (APGI 2002).
TABLE 3-9
TUCKERTOWN SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs) Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs) Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs)
527.11 0 537.31 43,947 554.94 208,126
529.20 4,146 539.81 61,360 557.42 239,635
530.86 9,121 542.71 84,577 559.69 274,461
532.32 15,755 545.62 110,282 561.75 305,970
534.20 24,046 549.14 143,449 564.22 346,600
535.86 33,168 552.25 178,275
Spillway capacity data for the Narrows Dam is shown in Table 3-10, derived from the Yadkin
Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (APGI 2002).
H-50
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-16 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-10
NARROWS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
482.20 58 497.88 69,269 511.35 280,086
483.49 2,659 499.17 78,779 512.27 306,000
485.15 5,263 500.28 90,878 513.38 331,915
486.99 11,323 501.38 104,703 514.85 361,288
489.02 19,975 502.86 125,441 515.96 386,340
490.50 26,032 504.15 147,904 516.51 399,298
491.97 32,952 505.63 172,959 517.99 404,491
493.45 40,736 507.10 198,877 520.57 440,782
495.11 49,385 508.39 220,477
496.40 58,895 509.87 250,713
Spillway capacity data for the Falls Dam is shown in Table 3-11, derived from the Yadkin
Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (APGI 2002).
TABLE 3-11
FALLS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
299.11 0 314.96 74,897 334.15 281,334
300.68 3,331 318.29 98,481 336.69 315,042
302.63 9,219 321.82 130,496 338.26 340,326
305.18 18,476 324.16 154,088 340.61 369,819
307.72 28,575 326.51 180,209 342.56 401,002
309.88 41,207 329.06 213,074
312.22 55,524 332.19 249,308
Spillway capacity data for the Tillery Dam is shown in Table 3-12, derived from the Yadkin–Pee
Dee Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (Progress Energy 2003).
H-51
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-17 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-12
TILLERY SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
254.17 0 274.67 208,000 288.67 495,000
258.67 18,000 277.17 250,000 290.17 540,000
262.67 50,000 280.17 300,000 290.67 560,000
264.67 70,000 282.67 350,000 291.67 600,000
267.67 103,000 284.67 380,000 293.67 680,000
270.67 145,000 286.67 440,000
Spillway capacity data for the Blewett Falls Dam is shown in Table 3-13, derived from the
Yadkin–Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project Initial Consultation Document (Progress Energy 2003).
TABLE 3-13
BLEWETT FALLS SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
Elevation
(ft. msl)
Capacity
(cfs)
174.08 0 185.38 200,000 193.68 500,000
176.08 13,000 186.08 220,000 194.68 550,000
177.08 25,000 187.58 270,000 195.58 600,000
178.08 37,000 188.38 300,000 196.58 650,000
180.08 70,000 189.08 323,000 197.58 700,000
181.38 100,000 190.08 360,000 198.58 750,000
182.08 120,000 191.08 395,000 199.08 775,000
183.48 150,000 192.58 450,000
This table represents calculations of spillway capacity when all flashboards are tripped.
3.2.2.5 Plant Operation Type
The Plant Operation Type is how the Model classifies and operates the plants. Four different
components are used to describe the operation of the plants.
Min Powerhouse Flow – All plants in this model have zero (0) value entered, as the turbine
input curves accurately define the lowest operating flow of the units.
H-52
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-18 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Plant Operation Type – This condition specifies what type of scheduling logic is to be used
for the plant. Options include Strictly Peaking, Non-generating, Run-of-River, and others.
Pumped storage plants follow pumping and discharge schedules. Strictly peaking plants use
logic to generate as much power as possible during the peak period, followed by secondary-
peak and then off-peak periods; all six hydroelectric stations in the system are strictly
peaking. Hybrid-pumped storage plants have a pumping schedule, but schedule plant
discharge using peaking plant logic. Non-generating plants like W. Kerr Scott are storage
plants without a powerhouse that releases flows to follow the target elevations and flow
requirements.
Delinked Owner – This condition sets the level of water conveyance support a plant receives
and provides to other plants operated by the same licensee/operator. All plants in the model
have this value unchecked, meaning the plants provide supporting operation to other plants
operated by the same owner. In this model, this condition means that High Rock,
Tuckertown, Narrows, and Falls provide support to one another and Tillery and Blewett
Falls provide support to one another.
Delinked System – This condition sets the level of support a plant receives and provides to
other plants operated by other licensees/operators in the modeled system. All plants in this
model have this condition checked; meaning the default Model logic for support between
plants is not in effect for plants operated by different operators.
3.2.3 Operational Data
3.2.3.1 Spill and Minimum Elevations
The spill or flood control elevation relates to a variety of physical situations (spillway crest,
partial gate coverage, maximum normal pool, etc.), but it represents the elevation at which the
model will begin to simulate spill to avoid increasing water elevation. Under a strictly peaking
plant, when the model calculates an end-of-period elevation above the spill elevation, the model
will calculate spill as well as the turbine/diversion discharge. The model’s logic, under a strictly
peaking plant, also attempts to reduce or eliminate occurrences when the reservoir elevation
exceeds the spill elevation.
H-53
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-19 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
The minimum elevation is the minimum allowable reservoir elevation. The elevation could be
set by regulations or by a physical limit (lowest available outlet invert). Bypass flows,
withdrawals, wicket gate leakage, and evaporation can draw the reservoir below this level. The
model will operate to eliminate occurrences when the reservoir elevation dips below this
elevation.
Table 3-14 lists the spill and minimum elevations for each facility in the Model.
TABLE 3-14
RESERVOIR SPILL AND MINIMUM ELEVATIONS
Facility Spill Elevation
(ft. msl)
Minimum Elevation
(ft. msl)
W. Kerr Scott 1,075.0 1,000.0
High Rock 623.9 594.8
Tuckertown 564.7 526.7
Narrows 509.8 503.8
Falls 332.8 320.0
Tillery 278.17 256.2
Blewett Falls* 178.08 161.1
* The elevation at which Blewett Falls begins to spill water is dependent on the
flashboards. If the flashboards are in place, the spill elevation is 176.08 ft. msl.
3.2.3.2 Flashboards
The Flashboards Condition allows the user to install and remove flashboards. Currently
flashboards can be installed or removed by day or by elevation. Along with controlling the
installation and removal of the flashboards, the Flashboards Condition contains the relationship
(flow versus elevation) for the outlet when the flashboards are installed. Blewett Falls Dam is
the only Dam in the system with flashboards. The Blewett Falls flashboards are elevation
controlled and, based on discussions with plant operators, simulated to trip four feet above the
top of the boards; trip elevation is 180.08 ft. msl. Based on discussions with plant operators, it is
assumed that if the flashboards are tripped they remain out for a minimum of 14 days at which
point the reservoir must be at or below 174.08 ft. msl for the model to initiate the flashboards.
H-54
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-20 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
The spillway discharge curve for Blewett Falls Dam with flashboards installed is shown in
Table 3-15.
When using flashboards, the following logic applies:
- When flashboards are installed (not tripped), the spill elevation (Table 3-14) is not used;
rather, the flashboard spillway crest elevation is used to calculate spill.
- Once the flashboards have been tripped, the target elevation is changed by the model to
be 0.1 feet below the flashboard reset elevation. When flashboards are out (tripped), the
Spillway Capacity condition in Physical Settings is used to compute spill flow rate, and
the Spill Elevation is set to be the spillway crest elevation.
TABLE 3-15
BLEWETT FALLS FLASHBOARD SPILLWAY CAPACITY VALUES
Elevation
(ft. msl) Capacity
(cfs)
176.08 0
178.08 75
179.08 5,130
180.08 13,130
180.58 20,130
181.28 30,130
182.09 40,130
3.2.3.3 Target Elevations
The target elevation is the user-defined elevation that the model attempts to meet (targets) as the
end-of-day reservoir elevation. The model straight-line interpolates between user input points to
identify a target elevation for each day. The model will deviate from the target to accommodate
forecasted inflows, to meet the plant’s own outflow requirements or constraints, and to support
flow requirements.
The simulated W. Kerr Scott target elevation is 1,030 ft. msl based on the W. Kerr Scott web site
(USACE, 2014). Table 3-16 lists the guide curve elevations for the APGI reservoirs (curves
H-55
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-21 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
needed for modeling). These are the target elevations used for the Historical Baseline scenario.
The Verification2001 scenario uses historical 2001 end-of-month elevations. The Tuckertown
and Falls target elevations were set to 3 feet below normal full pond. The High Rock and
Narrows target elevations are based on average historic elevations for the period 1983 through
2002. The Tillery and Blewett Falls target elevations, 277.5 ft. msl and 177 ft. msl respectively,
were based on discussion with plant operators.
TABLE 3-16
GUIDE CURVE TARGET ELEVATIONS OF APGI RESERVOIRS
Day of Year High Rock Target
Elevation (ft msl)
Tuckertown Target
Elevation (ft msl)
Narrows Target
Elevation (ft msl)
Falls Target
Elevation (ft msl)
Jan 1 616 561.7 508.8 329.8
Feb 1 616 561.7 508.74 329.8
Mar 1 618.3 561.7 509.15 329.8
Apr 1 620.85 561.7 508.89 329.8
Apr 15 622 561.7 508.74 329.8
May 1 622 561.7 508.57 329.8
Jun 1 622 561.7 508.2 329.8
Jul 1 622 561.7 508.23 329.8
Aug 1 622 561.7 508 329.8
Sep 1 619.98 561.7 507.93 329.8
Oct 1 617.51 561.7 508.17 329.8
Nov 1 616 561.7 508.42 329.8
Dec 1 616 561.7 508.52 329.8
Dec 31 616 561.7 508.79 329.8
3.2.3.4 Water Withdrawals
Historical water use (withdrawals and returns in cfs) was estimated following the procedures
outlined in Section 2.8.2. The monthly water use in cfs was modeled in the Historical Baseline
scenario to represent historical municipal and industrial water use from each reservoir. The
Historical Baseline scenario modeled withdrawals and returns in cfs and are presented in
Appendix B.
H-56
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-22 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.3.5 Minimum Flows
The simulated minimum instantaneous flow from W. Kerr Scott was simulated at 125 cfs based
on the W. Kerr Scott web site (USACE 2014).
Based on input from plant operators, the minimum instantaneous flow requirement at Blewett
Falls was simulated at 200 cfs, 50 cfs above the required minimum instantaneous flow during the
period of evaluation (1997 through 2003). Similarly, based on input from plant operators, the
minimum instantaneous flow requirement at Tillery was simulated at 80 cfs, 40 cfs above the
required minimum instantaneous flow during the period of evaluation (1997 through 2003).
3.2.3.6 Maximum Flows
The model allows a maximum flow constraint to be applied based on the reservoir elevation.
Maximum flows are limited from W. Kerr Scott reservoir to prevent flooding at Wilkesboro, NC.
This will limit operations to restrict flow to a maximum of the defined limit. The maximum
discharge is 125 cfs up to reservoir elevation 1,030 ft. msl and 5,400 cfs up until the reservoir is
going to spill.
3.2.3.7 Reservoir Fluctuation Limits
The Reservoir Level fluctuation limit defines how the fluctuation of the reservoir is limited
within each day. The Duke Energy developments both operate with elevation based reservoir
fluctuation limits. The fluctuation limit of the Tillery reservoir is a 1.3 ft. band surrounding the
target elevation of 277.5 ft. msl. The fluctuation limit of the Blewett Falls reservoir is a 5 ft.
band surrounding the target elevation of 177 ft. msl.
3.2.4 Generation Data
All unit performance information was estimated and modeled based on the information available
at the time of model development.
H-57
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-23 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.4.1 Headloss Coefficients
The Model allows two common headloss coefficients for each plant and an individual coefficient
for each unit. Headloss for each unit is calculated by multiplying the unit’s common coefficient
by the total flow for that common coefficient squared, added to the individual coefficient
multiplied, by the individual unit flow squared. The formula is:
iic
n
j
ji hFhFH 2
2
1
Where:
Hi is the unit headloss in feet
hc is the common coefficient for the ith
unit
hi is the individual coefficient for the ith
unit
Fi is the flow for the ith
unit
j runs from 1 to n
n is the number of units that have the same common coefficient as the unit i
Table 3-17 presents the estimated headlosses for each hydroelectric plant as a function of
flow (Q):
TABLE 3-17
HEADLOSS COEFFICIENTS
Facility Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6
High Rock 1.476843E-07 1.476843E-07 1.476843E-07
Tuckertown 1.366996E-07 1.366996E-07 1.366996E-07
Narrows 3.2E-07 3.2E-07 3.2E-07 3.2E-07
Falls 2.402915E-07 2.55102E-07 2.55102E-07
Tillery 7.55442E-08 1.14024E-07 7.55442E-08 5.66657E-08
Blewett Falls 8.21546E-07 8.21546E-07 8.21546E-07 5.09758E-07 5.09758E-07 5.09758E-07
H-58
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-24 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.4.2 Turbine Efficiency Curves
Turbine performance is entered into the Model by plant and as flow versus efficiency at five
separate net heads. The estimated turbine performance is presented in Figures 3-10 through
3-20.
FIGURE 3-10
HIGH ROCK POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-59
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-25 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-11
TUCKERTOWN POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
FIGURE 3-12
NARROWS POWERHOUSE UNITS 1, 2, AND 4
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-60
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-26 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-13
NARROWS POWERHOUSE UNIT 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
FIGURE 3-14
FALLS POWERHOUSE UNIT 1
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-61
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-27 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-15
FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 2 AND 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
FIGURE 3-16
TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 AND 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-62
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-28 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-17
TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNIT 2
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
FIGURE 3-18
TILLERY POWERHOUSE UNIT 4
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-63
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-29 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 3-19
BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
FIGURE 3-20
BLEWETT FALLS POWERHOUSE UNITS 4 THROUGH 6
TURBINE EFFICIENCIES OVER A RANGE OF NET HEADS
H-64
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-30 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
3.2.4.3 Generator Efficiency Curve
The Model generator data, like the turbine data, is entered by plant and then associated with a
unit. The generator performance data is a relationship of generator output versus generator
efficiency.
The generator condition includes a maximum generator output. This value is the maximum
generator output the model will allow, assuming there is turbine capacity to meet this limit. The
model will limit turbine output based on the generator maximum specified output. The generator
efficiency curves for each of the units in the system are shown in Tables 3-18 through 3-27.
TABLE 3-18
HIGH ROCK UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 1 through 3
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 13.75
67.06% 0.5 13.75
79.25% 1 13.75
87.53% 2 13.75
90.84% 3 13.75
92.65% 4 13.75
93.8% 5 13.75
95.19% 7 13.75
96.02% 9 13.75
97.09% 13.75 13.75
H-65
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-31 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-19
TUCKERTOWN UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 1 through 3
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 15.555
64.5% 0.5 15.555
77.37% 1 15.555
86.32% 2 15.555
89.93% 3 15.555
91.92% 4 15.555
94.07% 6 15.555
94.72% 7 15.555
96.24% 11 15.555
97.09% 15.555 15.555
TABLE 3-20
NARROWS UNITS 1, 2, AND 4
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 1, 2 and 4
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 27.5
82.09% 2 27.5
89.39% 4 27.5
92.25% 6 27.5
93.8% 8 27.5
94.78% 10 27.5
95.96% 14 27.5
96.66% 18 27.5
97.13% 22 27.5
97.56% 27.5 27.5
H-66
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-32 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-21
NARROWS UNIT 3
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Unit 3
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 31.25
68.47% 1 31.25
80.34% 2 31.25
88.29% 4 31.25
91.44% 6 31.25
93.15% 8 31.25
94.24% 10 31.25
94.99% 12 31.25
96.6% 20 31.25
97.56% 31.25 31.25
TABLE 3-22
FALLS UNIT 1
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Unit 1
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 8.75
58.27% 0.25 8.75
72.49% 0.5 8.75
83% 1 8.75
87.39% 1.5 8.75
89.83% 2 8.75
92.51% 3 8.75
93.97% 4 8.75
95.54% 6 8.75
96.62% 8.75 8.75
H-67
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-33 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-23
FALLS UNITS 2 AND 3
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 2 and 3
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
0 0 12.5
65.57% 0.5 12.5
83.59% 1.5 12.5
86.72% 2 12.5
90.2% 3 12.5
92.11% 4 12.5
93.33% 5 12.5
94.82% 7 12.5
95.7% 9 12.5
96.62% 12.5 12.5
TABLE 3-24
TILLERY UNITS 1, 3, AND 4
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 1, 3 and 4
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
92.73% 5 27.5
94.9% 10 27.5
96.19% 15 27.5
96.82% 20 27.5
96.89% 21 27.5
96.94% 22 27.5
96.98% 23 27.5
97.03% 25 27.5
97.05% 26.5 27.5
97.05% 27.5 27.5
H-68
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-34 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-25
TILLERY UNIT 2
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Unit 2
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
92.73% 5 22.5
93.94% 7.5 22.5
94.9% 10 22.5
95.64% 12.5 22.5
96.19% 15 22.5
96.57% 17.5 22.5
96.82% 20 22.5
96.89% 21 22.5
96.94% 22 22.5
96.96% 22.5 22.5
TABLE 3-26
BLEWETT FALLS UNITS 1 THROUGH 3
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 1 through 3
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
91.53% 0.5 3.75
92.91% 1 3.75
93.99% 1.5 3.75
94.43% 1.75 3.75
94.81% 2 3.75
95.13% 2.25 3.75
95.4% 2.5 3.75
95.61% 2.75 3.75
95.79% 3 3.75
95.92% 3.25 3.75
96.01% 3.5 3.75
96.07% 3.75 3.75
H-69
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-35 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
TABLE 3-27
BLEWETT FALLS UNITS 4 THROUGH 6
GENERATOR EFFICIENCY CURVE
Units 4 through 6
Efficiency Output (MW) Maximum Capacity (MW)
91.53% 0.5 5.25
92.91% 1 5.25
93.99% 1.5 5.25
94.81% 2 5.25
95.13% 2.25 5.25
95.4% 2.5 5.25
95.79% 3 5.25
96.01% 3.5 5.25
96.07% 3.75 5.25
96.07% 4 5.25
96.07% 4.5 5.25
96.07% 5.25 5.25
3.2.4.4 Wicket Gate Leakage
The Model wicket gate leakage flow is active only during times of non-generation. Thus, during
periods of non-generation, this leakage flow is used to make up all or a portion of the minimum
flow requirement. Wicket gate leakage was assumed at 10 cfs per unit for each of the APGI
hydroelectric stations (High Rock, Tuckertown, Narrows, and Falls). Wicket gate leakage of
10 cfs per unit at Tillery and 21 cfs per unit at Blewett Falls was estimated by plant operators.
3.2.4.5 Powerhouse Weekend Operations
The Powerhouse Weekend Operations Condition permits the simulation of reduced powerhouse
operations during Saturdays and/or Sundays. Minimum instantaneous and minimum daily
average flow requirements will be met by bringing the powerhouse online for the required flow
only. This condition removes the change-in-storage component from consideration in computing
a desired daily discharge. To simulate actual usage, Saturday and Sunday powerhouse
operations are minimized at all six hydroelectric stations. During high inflow times with little
H-70
Section 3 Historical Baseline
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 3-36 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
usable storage, the model will bring the powerhouse online to generate with outflows, rather than
permit spilling.
3.2.4.6 Maintenance
The maintenance schedule provides the functionality to take a unit out of service for all or part of
each year for a scenario run. There are currently no outages modeled in the Model.
H-71
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
4.0 MODEL CALIBRATION/VERIFICATION PROCESS
Verification is intended to validate the Model input data and logic so the Model and the
Historical Baseline may be used for comparisons of scenarios with various operational
alternatives. HDR performed model verification by comparing actual and model estimated
generation and discharge at multiple points in the system. Verification of the model was
completed using two different scenarios or model runs. The first (Historical Baseline) performs
a verification of the model input data, logic, and conditions. The Historical Baseline scenario
was simulated for the period 1955 through 2003. The results of the Historical Baseline scenario
were compared against historical operations for calendar years 1997 through 2003, which
represents the period of available hydroelectric operational data. Additionally, the Historical
Baseline scenario results where compared to historical USGS gage flows at the outlet of W. Kerr
Scott, High Rock, and Blewett Falls, these summaries are available in the following files:
Blewett02129000.xlsx, Kerr02112000.xlsx, and HighRock02122500.xlsx. In addition to the
Historical Baseline scenario, a second verification scenario (Verification2001) was developed to
simulate the detailed operations for calendar year 2001, which was one of the driest years on
record within the Basin.
Generation data is typically available for hydropower developments and is a metered value that
has good accuracy compared to other forms of data that are not metered or based on estimated
values with lower accuracy. Generation is a measure of available flow and storage volume,
which relates to inflows and reservoir elevations. When performing verification of water
quantity models with power generation, it is common to find discrepancies between observed
data and modeled output for generation and reservoir elevation when looking at a small sample
of time periods (day, week, or month). This is due to the difference between the set of rules
provided in the model versus the day-to-day decisions common in large power developments that
respond to power grid demands as well as storm forecasts and other non-measured impacts on
the reservoir and equipment. Modeled results for each verification scenario were compared with
historic generation, powerhouse flow, and reservoir levels. In addition to verifying the model
under different hydrologic conditions, it was also important to select relatively recent years for
model verification under conditions that are representative of current operating conditions.
As previously stated, the Model is coded to run day-to-day operations based on general operating
conditions or rules. The model follows these rules strictly, 24 hours per day and 365 days per
H-72
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
year, similar to an automated operation. Actual project operations generally follow the operating
rules; however, human intervention periodically deviates from the general operating rules to
accommodate day-to-day realities such as equipment failure and maintenance, changing
hydrologic conditions, power demands and energy pricing, and other factors. In addition to
differences between modeled operations versus actual operations that include human
interventions, there are also inherent discrepancies due to input data inaccuracies (e.g.,
differences in hydrology data, turbine or generator efficiencies, or reservoir storage curves). It is
important to understand that, due to these differences between actual operating conditions and
modeled conditions, model results will never completely match historical operations.
The verification goal is to obtain less than a 5 percent difference when comparing long-term
modeled results to historical generation data over the hydrologic period. In cases where the
modeled results exceeded a 5 percent difference, potential causes for the differences were
examined to determine whether the difference was due to deviations in model setup, historical
deviations in operations, or discrepancies in the reconstructed hydrology data.
4.1 Summary of Modeled Results versus Historical Data
Verification of the Model was performed using historical operations data. Verification of the
model was performed using two different scenarios, or model runs. The first scenario (Historical
Baseline) performs a verification of the model input data, logic, and conditions for calendar years
1997 through 2003. The second verification scenario was run using the specific calendar year
2001 (Verification2001).
4.1.1 Model Historical Baseline
The Historical Baseline scenario results were compared to historical operations for the
hydrologic period 1997 through 2003. Figures 4-1 through 4-7 show comparisons of the
modeled reservoir elevations for the Historical Baseline scenario compared to the historical
reported (observed) elevations for the same period. The plotted reported (observed) elevations
for the six hydroelectric facilities are based on historical end-of-month observations as historical
daily reservoir elevations were not available for the full period 1997 through 2003. Unit outages
during this period were not defined and, therefore, not taken into account in the Model and it was
assumed all units were available for operation for the full period of simulation.
H-73
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-1
MODELED AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT
DAILY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-74
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-4 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-2
MODELED AND HISTORICAL HIGH ROCK
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-75
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-5 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-3
MODELED AND HISTORICAL TUCKERTOWN
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-76
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-6 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-4
MODELED AND HISTORICAL NARROWS
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-77
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-7 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-5
MODELED AND HISTORICAL FALLS
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-78
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-8 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-6
MODELED AND HISTORICAL TILLERY
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-79
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-9 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-7
MODELED AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT FALLS
MONTHLY RESERVOIR ELEVATION COMPARISON
H-80
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-10 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
The Model simulation of the Historical Baseline scenario estimated an average annual energy
output 6 percent higher than historical generation for the same period, as shown in Table 4-1.
Based on available historical generation records, modeled and historical generation were
compared for the period 1997 through 2003 at all hydroelectric facilities. There are significant
annual swings in the percent difference between historical and modeled operations for the 1997
through 2003 period; however, over the long term the modeled and historical operations compare
favorably. Some of the swings in the percent difference between historical and modeled
operations may be due to the fact that this scenario was coded with generic operational logic.
For example, High Rock was simulated with Target Elevations based on average historical
operations and to follow the High Rock Operating Guide as outlined in Figure 2-2 versus the
actual historical reservoir drawdowns which may have occurred. The Verification2001 scenario
simulates targeted historical reservoir operations including drawdowns versus the generic rules
as outlined in the Historical Baseline scenario.
TABLE 4-1
HISTORICAL BASELINE: GENERATION COMPARISON
Percent Difference between Modeled and Historical Generation
([Modeled - Historic]/Historic)
Year High
Rock Tuckertown Narrows Falls Tillery
Blewett
Falls
System
Total
1997 16% 16% 24% 17% 9% 12% 17%
1998 -10% 5% -1% 2% 4% 8% 1%
1999 21% 12% 15% 18% 14% 15% 16%
2000 23% 9% 11% 21% 10% 5% 12%
2001 12% 3% 2% 8% 3% 4% 4%
2002 5% -1% -2% 5% -5% -4% -1%
2003 -6% 4% 0% 5% 0% 9% 1%
Period Total
(1997–2003) 4% 7% 6% 9% 4% 8% 6%
Figures 4-8 and 4-9 show the Model daily and accumulative modeled (verification scenario)
discharges from the W. Kerr Scott Project and the Blewett Falls development as compared to the
historical (observed) discharges for the same period. Blewett Falls simulated discharge is
compared to the USGS 02129000 Pee Dee near Rockingham gage flow, since the gage is just
H-81
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-11 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
downstream of the development. For the period 1997 through 2003, the Model estimated a
cumulative discharge from W. Kerr Scott reservoir and Blewett Falls reservoir within 2 percent
of the historical accumulative discharge from each facility. Historical W. Kerr Scott operational
data was unavailable for the period 6/1/1997 through 10/31/1997 and 4/1/2002 through
4/30/2002. The modeled flow was not plotted in Figure 4-8 for the periods of missing historical
operations. Additionally, the simulated W. Kerr Scott discharges during this period were not
included in the accumulated flow calculations.
H-82
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-12 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-8
MODELED AND HISTORICAL W. KERR SCOTT DISCHARGE COMPARISON
Periods of missing historical operations data
H-83
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-13 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-9
MODELED AND HISTORICAL BLEWETT FALLS DEVELOPMENT
DISCHARGE COMPARISON
H-84
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-14 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
4.1.2 Scenario Verification2001
The Verification2001 scenario was established in the Model following the typical operating
requirements of the system (same rule logic as the Historical Baseline scenario). Historical end-
of-week reservoir levels were simulated as the Model target elevations such that the model
attempts to operate the reservoir pools as they were historically operated for calendar year 2001.
During the fall of 2001 there was a significant drawdown of the Tillery and Blewett Falls
reservoirs to support FERC license required inspections. Due to this period of special hydro
operations at these two developments, a more detailed review and adjustment for model inputs
was considered to perform the verification. Historical hourly plant operations were reviewed for
the drawdown period of September through December of 2001. Based on this review, it was
identified that rather than operating for a short period of time at peak efficiency, during the
drawdown period, the hydro turbine units at Narrows and Falls were often operated for longer
durations at minimum unit operational flow. Simulation of this significant diversion from typical
hydro development turbine operations would require override of model logic and would not
result in a true verification of the model. Therefore this verification scenario was compared to
the annual historical discharge. Blewett Falls simulated discharge was compared to the USGS
streamflow gage 02129000 Pee Dee near Rockingham located a short distance downstream of
the development. The comparison of the simulated and historical discharge from each reservoir
combined with the Blewett Falls and USGS gage comparison is considered a good verification of
the model’s ability to simulate operations throughout the system of reservoirs.
As shown in Table 4-2, the simulated station discharge for six of the seven hydro developments
is very similar (within ±5%). The outlier is Falls where the historical discharge is significantly
less than the upstream development, indicating a potential discrepancy in the records for Falls.
Since there is no significant reservoir volume for storage or reregulation of inflows, the
discharge from Falls should be incrementally greater than Narrows as reflected in the modeled
discharge. It appears there is an error in the available historical discharge records for Falls as the
annual historical discharge is less than that reported from High Rock, Tuckertown, or Narrows;
therefore, the discharge comparison at Falls, 16.3%, is not considered valid. Scenario
Verification2001 was further reviewed by comparing the historical and simulated reservoir
H-85
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-15 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
elevations over the entire 2001 period. The comparison of the reservoir levels reflects the daily
operating rules and inflow used in the model to the historical data for the same period. Figures
4-10 through 4-16 show the historical and modeled operations for 2001, where modeled target
elevations represent historical end-of-week elevations. As shown, the model follows the trends
of the historical elevations very closely.
TABLE 4-2
MODEL VERIFICATION2001: STATION DISCHARGE COMPARISON
Total Annual Station Discharge (acre-feet)
Month W. Kerr
Scott High Rock Tuckertown Narrows Falls Tillery
Blewett Falls
USGS 02129000
Historical 177,757 1,144,936 1,174,957 1,212,335 1,025,633 1,305,219 1,983,503
Modeled 181,056 1,185,108 1,194,714 1,191,766 1,193,092 1,294,331 1,893,382
Difference
(Modeled -
Historical)
3,299 40,172 19,758 -20,569 167,459 -10,888 -90,121
Percent
Difference
(Difference/
Historical)
1.9% 3.5% 1.7% -1.7% 16.3% -0.8% -4.5%
H-86
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-16 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-10
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
W. KERR SCOTT PROJECT OPERATIONS
H-87
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-17 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-11
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
HIGH ROCK PROJECT OPERATIONS
H-88
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-18 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-12
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 HISTORICAL
TUCKERTOWN DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS
H-89
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-19 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-13
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
NARROWS DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS
H-90
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-20 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-14
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
FALLS PROJECT OPERATIONS
H-91
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-21 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-15
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
TILLERY PROJECT OPERATIONS
H-92
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-22 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-16
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
BLEWETT FALLS PROJECT OPERATIONS
H-93
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-23 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Figures 4-17 and 4-18 show the Model daily and cumulative modeled (Verification2001
scenario) discharges from the W. Kerr Scott Project and the Blewett Falls development
compared to the historical (observed) discharges for the same period. A review of Figure 4-17
shows the difference between the fixed target curve based operation simulated by the Model
compared to the historical “human factor” releases that tend to smooth out the releases except in
large inflow events. The accumulative discharge volume curve indicates that while the simulated
discharge appears quite different visually, the amount of water being discharged from W. Kerr
Scott is very similar.
H-94
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-24 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-17
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
W. KERR SCOTT PROJECT DISCHARGE COMPARISON
H-95
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-25 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
FIGURE 4-18
MODEL VERIFICATION2001 AND HISTORICAL
BLEWETT PROJECT DISCHARGE COMPARISON
H-96
Section 4 Model Calibration/Verification Process
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 4-26 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Figure 4-18 reflects the comparison of Blewett Falls simulated discharge to the USGS 02129000
Pee Dee near Rockingham gage. This figure illustrates the good fit between simulated and
historical data. There is one significant discharge difference between the simulated and
historical data that occurred in late March early April where historical data reflects a greater
discharge than was captured in the simulation. Prior to this period and after this single excursion
in data, the discharges are in good agreement and support the conclusion that the model is
validated.
H-97
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 5-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
5.0 MODEL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Summary
The purpose of this report is to document inputs and assumptions used in the development of the
Model, to demonstrate the model reasonably characterizes operations of the system, and to
demonstrate that the model is adequate for use in evaluating the effects of alternative operating
scenarios. The CHEOPS software and the Model are tools to evaluate relative sensitivity and
response of the Yadkin–Pee Dee River System to changing operational constraints. The model is
a tool and does not predict future conditions or outcomes. The model results must be analyzed
and interpreted based on knowledge of hydrologic and hydraulic principles and understanding of
results viewed in a relative, rather than an absolute, context.
5.2 Conclusions
As discussed in Section 4, the model verification process includes comparisons between modeled
output and historical data. The goal of this process is to obtain no more than 5 percent variance
when comparing modeled results to historical data for generation on an annual basis. The
modeled release from the Project is compared to historical data to show whether the model
provides a reasonable representation of Project operations throughout the year (e.g., the timing,
magnitude, and duration of operations).
As shown in Tables 4-1 and 4-2, there are significant swings between modeled and historical
generation. However, there are many factors inherent in the model data and setups that can
contribute to output discrepancies (i.e., deviations) when compared to historical data. In many
cases, several of these factors may be involved simultaneously, which makes it difficult to isolate
individual sources of difference. Potential sources of deviations from historical data include
actual discretionary reservoir operations versus simulated generic operations, estimated reservoir
evaporation, estimated unit performance curves, historical unit outages, hydrology, minimum
flow requirements, and leakage through the Blewett Falls flashboards:
H-98
Section 5 Model Summary and Conclusions
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 5-2 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Reservoir Operations – Reservoir operations have been modeled based on average or
generic rule curves which do not always capture historical discretionary reservoir
drawdowns.
Reservoir Evaporation – Reservoir evaporation has been simulated based on estimated
reservoir area curves and estimated evaporation rates.
Unit Performance – The Model has been set up with estimated unit performance
information.
Historical Unit Outages – The verification scenarios do not take into account detailed
historical unit outage information.
Hydrology – The Model uses reconstructed UIF data as the input for daily inflow water to
the system. The unimpaired hydrology was synthesized based on gage data and historical
water use records, both of which have a certain amount of inherent error especially when
multiple locations and data sources are involved. The overall hydrologic data set appears to
be a good representation of daily inflows and is acceptable for use in future water
management planning.
Minimum Flow Requirements – The Model is set up to account for minimum streamflow
requirements automatically. As a result, the Model is proactive in automatically addressing
minimum streamflow requirements rather than reactive in providing excess flow to avoid
potential violations, as the case may be in actual operations.
Leakage Through the Blewett Falls Flashboards – The Model has been set up with estimated
leakage trough the flashboards. The actually leakage through the flashboards will vary
depending on the condition of the boards.
In interpreting the information provided in this model operations/verification report, it is
important to reflect on the purpose of the model: to reasonably characterize development
operations. Comparing model results with historical data confirms use of the model as a tool for
simulating “real” operations. It is not possible with reasonable time and budget constraints to
account for every outside influence or condition to match historical operations and hydrology.
H-99
Section 5 Model Summary and Conclusions
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 5-3 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
Small changes in input data or model logic can often result in large swings in output. This is due
to a number of reasons including (but not limited to) runoff characteristics, reliance on
coordinated operations, and numerous/variable flow requirements. Each of these elements
individually contributes to the sensitivity of the system. Combined, they multiply that sensitivity
exponentially. The input data and logic in the historical base scenario is an attempt to
consolidate the effects of these variables to achieve an approximation of “characteristic
operations.”
The sensitivity described above also means that those factors that are unable to be accounted for
in the model (short-term operations decisions based on pricing, demand, forecasts, etc.) as well
as data that is impossible to replicate exactly (synthesized hydrology data, shutdowns due to
irregular maintenance, etc.) can result in relatively large discrepancies between modeled output
and historical data on a per-month/per-development basis. The factors and sensitivity warrant
careful model review with awareness of the potential for outliers. The ultimate acceptance of the
results should not hinge on the extremes, but rather on the overall impression of consistency
between modeled and historical operations. Particularly, it must always be foremost in model
discussions that the model should always be used to assess the relative impacts between
scenarios. What this means is model verification is the only time it is appropriate to compare
model results with historical data.
In the opinion of HDR, verification results show the Model compares favorably to historical
data, reasonably characterizes study area operations, and is appropriate for use in evaluating the
effects of alternative operating scenarios. However, appropriate use of the results is cautioned.
As with any model, accuracy is highly dependent on input data; consequently, model results
should be viewed in a relative, rather than absolute, context. The Model is a tool that, as this
report demonstrates, can be successfully used to evaluate the relative sensitivity and response of
the project to changing operational constraints, including water demands from the system.
H-100
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 6-1 Operations Model, Yadkin–Pee Dee River Basin
Union County, North Carolina Model Logic and Verification Report
6.0 REFERENCES
Alcoa Power Generating, Inc. (APGI). 2006. Yadkin Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2197):
Application for License. April 2006.
_____. 2002. Yadkin Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2197): Project Relicensing Initial
Consultation Document. September 2002.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1982a. NOAA Technical Report NWS 33,
Evaporation Atlas for the Contiguous 48 United States. June 1982.
–––––. 1982b. NOAA Technical Report NWS 34, Mean Monthly, Seasonal, and Annual Pan
Evaporation for the United States. December 1982.
Progress Energy. 2007. Comprehensive Settlement Agreement for the Relicensing of the
Yadkin–Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206). June 2007.
_____. 2006. Yadkin-Pee Dee River Project (FERC No. 2206): Application for License. April
2006.
_____. 2003. Yadkin - Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2206) Initial Consultation
Document. February2003.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2014. http://epec.saw.usace.army.mil/WKSDESC.
TXT. Accessed June 18, 2014.
H-101
APPENDIX A
REFERENCE GAGE HIND-CASTED WATER USE
H-102
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1956 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1957 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1958 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1959 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1960 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1961 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1962 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1963 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1964 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1965 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1966 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1967 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1968 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1969 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1970 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1971 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1972 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1973 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1974 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1975 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1976 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1977 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1978 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1979 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1980 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1981 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1982 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1983 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1984 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1985 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1986 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1987 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1988 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1989 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1990 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1991 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1992 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1993 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1994 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1995 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1996 (0.02) (0.02) 0.03 0.10 0.38 0.71 0.88 0.74 0.38 0.12 0.06 (0.00)
1997 0.02 (0.08) 0.14 0.31 0.51 0.85 0.97 0.90 0.50 0.19 0.22 0.17
1998 0.00 (0.09) 0.10 0.27 0.47 0.81 0.94 0.86 0.46 0.15 0.17 0.12
1999 (0.02) (0.10) 0.06 0.23 0.42 0.77 0.91 0.82 0.41 0.11 0.11 0.07
2000 (0.04) (0.11) 0.03 0.19 0.38 0.73 0.88 0.77 0.37 0.07 0.06 0.01
2001 (0.06) (0.12) (0.01) 0.14 0.33 0.69 0.85 0.73 0.33 0.04 0.00 (0.04)
2002 (0.08) (0.13) (0.05) 0.10 0.29 0.65 0.82 0.68 0.29 (0.00) (0.05) (0.09)
2003 (0.08) (0.10) (0.03) 0.24 0.35 0.72 0.90 0.77 0.53 0.12 0.10 0.02
2004 0.04 0.03 0.03 (0.69) 0.40 0.70 0.92 0.79 0.39 0.12 0.08 (0.01)
2005 0.01 (0.03) 0.04 0.15 0.37 0.70 0.90 0.79 0.39 0.10 0.06 (0.01)
2006 0.00 0.10 (0.02) 0.12 0.34 0.69 0.93 0.76 0.40 0.04 0.01 0.03
2007 (0.01) (0.03) 0.06 0.14 0.41 0.68 0.83 0.68 0.30 0.09 0.05 (0.04)
2008 (0.01) (0.03) 0.05 0.16 0.36 0.70 0.83 0.69 0.31 0.12 0.06 (0.04)
2009 (0.02) 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.36 0.70 0.86 0.70 0.38 0.12 (0.01) (0.03)
2010 (0.03) (0.02) 0.01 0.12 0.37 0.68 0.84 0.65 0.34 0.15 0.04 (0.10)
2011 (0.09) (0.04) 0.00 0.15 0.33 0.68 0.87 0.76 0.43 0.19 0.06 0.05
2012 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.20 0.44 0.70 0.87 0.75 0.35 0.16 0.10 0.02
USGS Gage 02111000
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 1 6/26/2014
H-103
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 2111500
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1956 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1957 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1958 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1959 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1960 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1961 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1962 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1963 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1964 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1965 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1966 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1967 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1968 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1969 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1970 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1971 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1972 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1973 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1974 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1975 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1976 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1977 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1978 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1979 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1980 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1981 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1982 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1983 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1984 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1985 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1986 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1987 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1988 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1989 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1990 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1991 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1992 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1993 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1994 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1995 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1996 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1997 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1998 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
1999 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2000 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2001 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2002 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2003 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2004 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2005 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2006 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2007 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2008 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2009 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2010 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2011 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
2012 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.24 2.26 2.80 2.32 1.35 0.53 0.14 0.05
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 2 6/26/2014
H-104
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1956 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1957 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1958 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1959 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1960 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1961 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1962 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1963 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1964 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1965 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1966 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1967 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1968 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1969 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1970 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1971 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1972 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1973 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1974 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1975 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1976 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1977 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1978 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1979 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1980 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1981 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1982 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1983 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1984 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1985 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1986 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1987 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1988 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1989 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1990 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1991 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1992 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1993 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1994 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1995 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1996 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1997 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1998 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
1999 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2000 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2001 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2002 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2003 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2004 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2005 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2006 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2007 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2008 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2009 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2010 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2011 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
2012 0.04 0.07 0.25 0.64 1.25 2.29 2.84 2.35 1.37 0.53 0.14 0.05
USGS Gage 2128000
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 3 6/26/2014
H-105
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 2118500
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1956 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1957 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1958 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1959 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1960 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1961 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1962 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1963 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1964 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1965 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1966 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1967 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1968 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1969 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1970 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1971 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1972 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1973 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1974 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1975 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1976 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1977 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1978 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1979 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1980 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1981 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1982 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1983 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1984 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1985 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1986 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1987 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1988 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1989 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1990 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1991 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1992 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1993 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1994 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1995 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1996 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1997 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1998 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
1999 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2000 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2001 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2002 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2003 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2004 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2005 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2006 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2007 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2008 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2009 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2010 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2011 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
2012 0.06 0.10 0.35 0.91 1.77 3.23 4.01 3.31 1.93 0.75 0.20 0.07
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 4 6/26/2014
H-106
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 02118000
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 4.55 4.59 5.06 6.41 8.41 11.52 13.22 11.78 9.13 6.81 5.28 4.88
1956 4.60 4.63 5.11 6.46 8.46 11.57 13.27 11.83 9.18 6.87 5.33 4.93
1957 4.64 4.68 5.15 6.50 8.51 11.62 13.32 11.88 9.24 6.92 5.38 4.98
1958 4.69 4.73 5.20 6.55 8.56 11.67 13.37 11.94 9.29 6.98 5.43 5.03
1959 4.74 4.77 5.24 6.60 8.61 11.72 13.42 11.99 9.34 7.03 5.48 5.08
1960 4.78 4.82 5.29 6.64 8.66 11.78 13.48 12.04 9.40 7.09 5.54 5.13
1961 4.85 4.89 5.36 6.72 8.74 11.86 13.56 12.12 9.48 7.17 5.61 5.20
1962 4.93 4.96 5.43 6.79 8.82 11.94 13.65 12.21 9.57 7.26 5.69 5.28
1963 5.00 5.03 5.50 6.87 8.90 12.02 13.73 12.29 9.66 7.35 5.78 5.36
1964 5.08 5.11 5.58 6.95 8.98 12.11 13.82 12.38 9.75 7.44 5.86 5.44
1965 5.16 5.18 5.65 7.03 9.06 12.19 13.91 12.46 9.84 7.53 5.94 5.52
1966 5.23 5.26 5.73 7.11 9.15 12.28 14.00 12.55 9.93 7.62 6.03 5.60
1967 5.31 5.34 5.81 7.19 9.23 12.37 14.09 12.64 10.02 7.71 6.11 5.69
1968 5.39 5.42 5.88 7.27 9.32 12.46 14.18 12.73 10.12 7.81 6.20 5.77
1969 5.48 5.50 5.96 7.36 9.41 12.55 14.27 12.83 10.22 7.91 6.29 5.86
1970 5.56 5.58 6.05 7.44 9.50 12.64 14.37 12.92 10.32 8.00 6.38 5.95
1971 5.64 5.66 6.13 7.53 9.59 12.73 14.47 13.01 10.41 8.10 6.47 6.03
1972 5.73 5.74 6.21 7.61 9.68 12.83 14.56 13.11 10.51 8.20 6.56 6.12
1973 5.81 5.83 6.29 7.70 9.77 12.92 14.66 13.20 10.61 8.30 6.65 6.21
1974 5.90 5.91 6.37 7.79 9.86 13.02 14.76 13.30 10.72 8.40 6.74 6.30
1975 5.99 6.00 6.46 7.88 9.95 13.11 14.86 13.40 10.82 8.50 6.84 6.39
1976 6.08 6.08 6.55 7.97 10.05 13.21 14.96 13.50 10.93 8.61 6.93 6.48
1977 6.17 6.17 6.63 8.06 10.15 13.31 15.07 13.60 11.03 8.71 7.03 6.58
1978 6.26 6.26 6.72 8.16 10.25 13.42 15.17 13.71 11.14 8.82 7.13 6.67
1979 6.35 6.35 6.81 8.25 10.35 13.52 15.28 13.81 11.25 8.93 7.23 6.77
1980 6.45 6.45 6.91 8.35 10.45 13.63 15.39 13.92 11.37 9.04 7.33 6.87
1981 6.52 6.52 6.98 8.42 10.53 13.71 15.48 14.00 11.45 9.13 7.41 6.95
1982 6.60 6.59 7.05 8.50 10.61 13.79 15.56 14.09 11.54 9.22 7.49 7.03
1983 6.67 6.67 7.13 8.58 10.69 13.88 15.65 14.17 11.63 9.31 7.58 7.11
1984 6.75 6.74 7.20 8.66 10.77 13.96 15.73 14.26 11.72 9.40 7.66 7.19
1985 6.82 6.82 7.27 8.73 10.86 14.05 15.82 14.35 11.81 9.49 7.74 7.27
1986 6.90 6.90 7.35 8.81 10.94 14.13 15.91 14.44 11.90 9.58 7.83 7.36
1987 6.98 6.97 7.43 8.90 11.03 14.22 16.00 14.53 11.99 9.67 7.92 7.44
1988 7.06 7.05 7.51 8.98 11.11 14.31 16.09 14.62 12.09 9.77 8.00 7.52
1989 7.14 7.13 7.58 9.06 11.20 14.40 16.18 14.71 12.18 9.87 8.09 7.61
1990 7.22 7.21 7.66 9.14 11.29 14.49 16.28 14.80 12.28 9.96 8.18 7.70
1991 7.41 7.40 7.85 9.34 11.50 14.71 16.49 15.02 12.50 10.19 8.39 7.90
1992 7.61 7.60 8.04 9.54 11.71 14.92 16.72 15.24 12.73 10.43 8.61 8.11
1993 7.81 7.80 8.24 9.75 11.93 15.15 16.95 15.47 12.97 10.67 8.83 8.33
1994 8.02 8.00 8.45 9.96 12.16 15.38 17.18 15.71 13.21 10.92 9.06 8.55
1995 8.23 8.22 8.65 10.18 12.39 15.62 17.43 15.95 13.46 11.17 9.30 8.78
1996 8.45 8.43 8.87 10.41 12.63 15.87 17.68 16.20 13.71 11.43 9.54 9.01
1997 8.67 8.66 9.09 10.64 12.87 16.12 17.93 16.46 13.98 11.70 9.79 9.25
1998 8.71 8.71 9.17 10.84 13.05 16.44 17.78 15.73 13.27 11.09 9.34 8.82
1999 8.74 8.75 9.25 11.05 13.23 16.76 17.64 15.01 12.57 10.48 8.90 8.39
2000 8.77 8.80 9.33 11.25 13.41 17.08 17.49 14.28 11.86 9.87 8.46 7.95
2001 8.81 8.85 9.41 11.46 13.59 17.40 17.34 13.56 11.15 9.27 8.02 7.52
2002 8.84 8.90 9.49 11.66 13.77 17.72 17.19 12.84 10.45 8.66 7.58 7.09
2003 8.52 8.61 9.30 11.22 13.71 17.37 17.18 13.72 10.99 8.94 7.64 7.21
2004 8.19 8.32 9.12 10.79 13.65 17.03 17.18 14.60 11.54 9.23 7.71 7.33
2005 7.87 8.02 8.94 10.35 13.59 16.68 17.17 15.49 12.08 9.52 7.77 7.45
2006 7.54 7.73 8.75 9.92 13.53 16.33 17.16 16.37 12.62 9.81 7.84 7.57
2007 7.22 7.44 8.57 9.48 13.46 15.99 17.16 17.26 13.17 10.10 7.90 7.69
2008 7.68 7.58 7.96 9.59 11.83 16.02 17.13 15.22 12.03 9.51 8.10 7.53
2009 7.32 7.11 7.96 8.99 10.84 14.28 16.58 14.65 11.50 8.57 7.26 6.76
2010 7.21 7.32 7.68 9.33 11.41 14.81 16.70 14.88 12.34 9.21 7.51 7.21
2011 7.20 7.03 7.67 9.05 11.23 14.93 16.38 15.04 11.81 9.02 7.54 7.00
2012 7.02 7.03 7.69 9.00 11.31 14.66 16.25 14.66 11.55 8.93 7.63 7.24
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 5 6/26/2014
H-107
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 2120780
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1956 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1957 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1958 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1959 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1960 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1961 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1962 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1963 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1964 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1965 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1966 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1967 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1968 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1969 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1970 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1971 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1972 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1973 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1974 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1975 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1976 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1977 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1978 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1979 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1980 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1981 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1982 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1983 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1984 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1985 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1986 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1987 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1988 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1989 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1990 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1991 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1992 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1993 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1994 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1995 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1996 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1997 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1998 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
1999 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2000 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2001 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2002 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2003 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2004 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2005 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2006 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2007 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2008 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2009 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2010 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2011 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
2012 0.04 0.07 0.26 0.66 1.28 2.33 2.89 2.39 1.39 0.54 0.14 0.05
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 6 6/26/2014
H-108
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 2125000
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1956 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1957 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1958 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1959 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1960 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1961 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1962 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1963 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1964 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1965 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1966 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1967 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1968 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1969 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1970 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1971 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1972 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1973 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1974 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1975 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1976 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1977 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1978 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1979 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1980 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1981 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1982 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1983 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1984 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1985 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1986 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1987 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1988 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1989 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1990 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1991 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1992 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1993 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1994 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1995 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1996 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1997 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1998 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
1999 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2000 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2001 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2002 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2003 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2004 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2005 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2006 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2007 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2008 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2009 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2010 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2011 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
2012 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.20 0.40 0.72 0.90 0.74 0.43 0.17 0.04 0.02
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 7 6/26/2014
H-109
Appendix A - Reference Gage Hind-Casted Water Use
USGS Gage 2126000
NET WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1955 (12.83) (16.50) (14.95) (9.51) 4.27 18.64 22.35 19.76 5.86 (6.68) (14.38) (17.57)
1956 (13.03) (16.72) (15.18) (9.74) 4.09 18.47 22.15 19.59 5.68 (6.88) (14.60) (17.82)
1957 (13.22) (16.95) (15.41) (9.97) 3.91 18.30 21.96 19.42 5.50 (7.09) (14.84) (18.07)
1958 (13.42) (17.19) (15.66) (10.21) 3.72 18.13 21.75 19.25 5.31 (7.30) (15.07) (18.32)
1959 (13.62) (17.42) (15.90) (10.45) 3.53 17.95 21.55 19.07 5.12 (7.51) (15.31) (18.58)
1960 (13.83) (17.67) (16.15) (10.69) 3.33 17.77 21.34 18.89 4.92 (7.73) (15.56) (18.85)
1961 (14.04) (17.92) (16.41) (10.94) 3.15 17.61 21.14 18.72 4.75 (7.94) (15.79) (19.10)
1962 (14.25) (18.18) (16.67) (11.19) 2.97 17.44 20.94 18.56 4.57 (8.15) (16.02) (19.36)
1963 (14.47) (18.44) (16.93) (11.44) 2.78 17.27 20.74 18.39 4.39 (8.36) (16.25) (19.63)
1964 (14.69) (18.71) (17.20) (11.70) 2.60 17.10 20.53 18.21 4.21 (8.57) (16.49) (19.89)
1965 (14.92) (18.98) (17.47) (11.97) 2.40 16.92 20.32 18.04 4.02 (8.79) (16.74) (20.17)
1966 (15.15) (19.26) (17.75) (12.24) 2.21 16.74 20.10 17.86 3.83 (9.02) (16.98) (20.45)
1967 (15.39) (19.54) (18.03) (12.51) 2.01 16.56 19.88 17.67 3.63 (9.25) (17.24) (20.73)
1968 (15.63) (19.83) (18.32) (12.79) 1.80 16.37 19.66 17.49 3.43 (9.48) (17.49) (21.02)
1969 (15.88) (20.12) (18.61) (13.07) 1.59 16.18 19.43 17.29 3.23 (9.72) (17.76) (21.31)
1970 (16.13) (20.42) (18.91) (13.36) 1.38 15.99 19.19 17.10 3.03 (9.96) (18.02) (21.61)
1971 (16.45) (20.81) (19.29) (13.73) 1.12 15.76 18.91 16.87 2.78 (10.25) (18.36) (21.99)
1972 (16.78) (21.21) (19.68) (14.10) 0.86 15.53 18.62 16.64 2.52 (10.55) (18.71) (22.37)
1973 (17.12) (21.61) (20.07) (14.48) 0.60 15.30 18.33 16.40 2.27 (10.85) (19.06) (22.77)
1974 (17.46) (22.02) (20.47) (14.86) 0.33 15.06 18.03 16.17 2.01 (11.16) (19.41) (23.16)
1975 (17.81) (22.44) (20.88) (15.25) 0.06 14.82 17.73 15.92 1.74 (11.47) (19.77) (23.57)
1976 (18.16) (22.87) (21.29) (15.65) (0.22) 14.58 17.43 15.68 1.47 (11.79) (20.14) (23.98)
1977 (18.52) (23.30) (21.71) (16.05) (0.50) 14.33 17.12 15.43 1.20 (12.11) (20.51) (24.39)
1978 (18.89) (23.74) (22.14) (16.46) (0.79) 14.08 16.80 15.18 0.93 (12.44) (20.88) (24.82)
1979 (19.26) (24.19) (22.57) (16.88) (1.08) 13.82 16.48 14.92 0.64 (12.77) (21.27) (25.25)
1980 (19.64) (24.64) (23.01) (17.30) (1.37) 13.57 16.16 14.66 0.36 (13.11) (21.65) (25.68)
1981 (19.95) (25.02) (23.40) (17.68) (1.64) 13.32 15.86 14.42 0.10 (13.42) (22.00) (26.08)
1982 (20.27) (25.41) (23.79) (18.06) (1.91) 13.08 15.56 14.18 (0.16) (13.73) (22.36) (26.47)
1983 (20.60) (25.81) (24.18) (18.44) (2.19) 12.83 15.25 13.93 (0.43) (14.05) (22.72) (26.88)
1984 (20.93) (26.21) (24.58) (18.83) (2.47) 12.57 14.94 13.67 (0.71) (14.38) (23.08) (27.29)
1985 (21.26) (26.62) (24.99) (19.23) (2.76) 12.32 14.63 13.42 (0.99) (14.71) (23.46) (27.71)
1986 (21.60) (27.03) (25.41) (19.64) (3.05) 12.05 14.30 13.16 (1.27) (15.04) (23.83) (28.13)
1987 (21.95) (27.45) (25.83) (20.05) (3.35) 11.78 13.98 12.89 (1.56) (15.38) (24.22) (28.56)
1988 (22.31) (27.88) (26.26) (20.47) (3.65) 11.51 13.64 12.62 (1.85) (15.73) (24.61) (29.00)
1989 (22.67) (28.32) (26.70) (20.90) (3.96) 11.23 13.30 12.34 (2.15) (16.08) (25.01) (29.45)
1990 (23.03) (28.77) (27.15) (21.33) (4.27) 10.95 12.96 12.06 (2.45) (16.44) (25.42) (29.90)
1991 (23.75) (29.64) (28.01) (22.17) (4.86) 10.42 12.30 11.53 (3.02) (17.12) (26.17) (30.76)
1992 (24.49) (30.54) (28.89) (23.03) (5.47) 9.87 11.63 10.99 (3.61) (17.82) (26.96) (31.64)
1993 (25.26) (31.46) (29.80) (23.92) (6.10) 9.31 10.93 10.43 (4.21) (18.53) (27.76) (32.54)
1994 (26.05) (32.42) (30.74) (24.84) (6.75) 8.73 10.22 9.85 (4.84) (19.27) (28.59) (33.47)
1995 (26.87) (33.41) (31.70) (25.78) (7.41) 8.13 9.48 9.26 (5.48) (20.03) (29.44) (34.43)
1996 (27.71) (34.42) (32.70) (26.76) (8.10) 7.52 8.72 8.65 (6.13) (20.82) (30.32) (35.42)
1997 (29.30) (36.39) (34.52) (28.52) (9.63) 6.87 6.90 6.58 (8.46) (22.58) (31.78) (36.94)
1998 (30.52) (35.74) (34.27) (26.21) (8.40) 8.51 9.59 7.69 (7.82) (22.67) (33.10) (37.46)
1999 (31.74) (35.09) (34.02) (23.90) (7.16) 10.14 12.29 8.80 (7.18) (22.75) (34.41) (37.98)
2000 (32.97) (34.44) (33.77) (21.59) (5.92) 11.78 14.98 9.91 (6.54) (22.83) (35.73) (38.50)
2001 (34.19) (33.79) (33.52) (19.28) (4.69) 13.42 17.67 11.02 (5.90) (22.91) (37.05) (39.02)
2002 (35.41) (33.14) (33.27) (16.96) (3.45) 15.06 20.36 12.13 (5.25) (22.99) (38.36) (39.53)
2003 (25.52) (48.05) (60.34) (56.43) (36.05) (16.83) 1.89 (2.50) (4.21) (11.75) (19.84) (29.10)
2004 (20.85) (49.91) (30.48) (16.15) 0.75 11.22 18.71 11.74 (22.41) (16.88) (26.21) (29.61)
2005 (27.35) (33.52) (39.81) (25.01) 1.19 6.46 14.07 10.86 4.41 (14.14) (21.01) (40.52)
2006 (32.61) (25.90) (20.60) (10.12) 2.80 9.33 23.38 12.46 (5.99) (16.32) (40.41) (29.84)
2007 (41.50) (35.27) (32.15) (18.52) 2.07 12.11 21.91 19.96 5.19 (10.28) (15.08) (21.19)
2008 (17.29) (21.80) (23.63) (24.78) (4.31) 16.50 21.49 5.94 (8.02) (15.27) (21.89) (40.11)
2009 (26.06) (23.61) (43.42) (18.86) (5.41) 11.19 19.87 13.87 2.06 (4.55) (28.84) (42.48)
2010 (45.74) (54.75) (38.87) (18.77) (9.54) 1.66 14.40 4.84 (2.98) (12.00) (17.17) (22.93)
2011 (21.26) (28.76) (33.76) (24.10) (10.68) 8.72 18.84 11.42 (4.64) (16.62) (27.15) (31.24)
2012 (37.66) (35.63) (30.49) (17.79) (11.23) 8.10 16.13 2.84 (9.63) (16.43) (19.52) (25.71)
USGS_gage_flows_1955to2012_Daily.xlsx A - 8 6/26/2014
H-110
APPENDIX B
WATER USE BY RESERVOIR BASIN
H-111
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
1998 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
1999 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2000 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2001 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2002 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2003 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2004 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2005 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2006 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2007 0.44 0.52 1.22 2.78 5.19 9.29 11.47 9.56 5.61 2.31 0.83 0.45
2008 0.48 0.49 1.18 2.77 5.24 9.24 11.37 9.53 5.49 2.18 0.70 0.28
2009 0.35 0.49 1.08 2.61 5.10 9.27 11.42 9.41 5.54 2.25 0.75 0.39
2010 0.34 0.50 1.25 2.79 5.17 9.33 11.54 9.69 5.68 2.25 0.94 0.57
2011 0.56 0.55 1.25 2.83 5.27 9.34 11.55 9.59 5.66 2.45 0.88 0.50
2012 0.46 0.56 1.34 2.87 5.18 9.28 11.47 9.59 5.67 2.42 0.89 0.50
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 1 6/26/2014
H-112
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.26 0.35 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.09 0.09
1998 0.28 0.36 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.22 0.15 0.14
1999 0.30 0.37 0.25 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.20 0.19
2000 0.32 0.38 0.29 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.26 0.24
2001 0.35 0.39 0.32 0.29 0.32 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.31 0.29
2002 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.34
2003 0.36 0.37 0.34 0.20 0.30 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.12 0.25 0.21 0.24
2004 0.25 0.24 0.29 1.12 0.25 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.23 0.27
2005 0.28 0.30 0.27 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.26 0.26
2006 0.28 0.17 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.25 0.29 0.25 0.34 0.31 0.23
2007 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.24 0.31 0.35 0.37 0.35 0.29 0.26 0.29
2008 0.34 0.27 0.22 0.27 0.34 0.24 0.25 0.33 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.13
2009 0.22 0.24 0.13 0.13 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.23
2010 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.26 0.35 0.41 0.53 0.39 0.16 0.38 0.48
2011 0.50 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.40 0.37 0.38 0.31 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.26
2012 0.29 0.27 0.36 0.34 0.21 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.32 0.27 0.29
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 2 6/26/2014
H-113
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN HIGH ROCK LAKE
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 143.18 143.18 149.78 171.94 204.64 247.37 273.47 257.25 219.73 176.01 151.10 140.64
1998 141.93 142.43 148.66 173.25 206.26 250.55 273.62 256.75 215.84 173.11 148.66 139.73
1999 140.68 141.67 147.54 174.55 207.89 253.73 273.77 256.24 211.95 170.21 146.22 138.82
2000 139.43 140.92 146.42 175.86 209.51 256.91 273.92 255.74 208.07 167.30 143.79 137.90
2001 138.18 140.16 145.30 177.17 211.14 260.09 274.07 255.23 204.18 164.40 141.35 136.99
2002 136.94 139.41 144.18 178.48 212.76 263.27 274.22 254.72 200.29 161.50 138.91 136.08
2003 135.79 138.69 144.00 175.55 212.43 259.87 271.73 257.20 203.81 162.84 138.95 134.59
2004 133.82 137.27 143.08 171.96 211.61 256.29 269.02 259.34 206.66 164.13 139.27 132.67
2005 132.93 136.71 142.99 168.90 211.09 252.09 266.11 262.70 211.82 166.06 137.60 131.89
2006 130.84 136.34 143.28 167.27 209.02 249.59 263.65 264.45 212.69 166.78 140.25 128.95
2007 131.74 137.44 143.03 164.44 212.22 246.28 261.65 266.50 219.43 170.39 141.47 129.66
2008 132.17 129.21 135.40 155.82 188.12 254.45 264.89 241.82 192.55 152.63 130.12 123.15
2009 127.60 123.06 129.17 147.21 173.89 227.87 254.06 237.67 190.54 148.95 127.91 122.54
2010 132.79 130.93 132.52 154.78 185.71 238.09 263.42 235.82 203.02 155.69 116.64 125.86
2011 126.66 123.18 129.93 147.08 180.82 242.89 257.85 244.07 194.71 153.61 128.11 121.66
2012 123.95 124.18 133.49 154.16 185.93 233.90 261.76 234.08 189.18 151.49 132.86 122.08
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 3 6/26/2014
H-114
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN HIGH ROCK LAKE
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 118.56 125.90 124.82 131.14 119.89 117.72 114.38 110.66 108.42 107.01 103.40 104.83
1998 117.47 121.75 121.53 125.62 116.53 114.79 112.35 109.39 108.37 108.97 107.30 109.00
1999 116.38 117.61 118.24 120.11 113.18 111.87 110.32 108.12 108.33 110.94 111.19 113.18
2000 115.30 113.47 114.95 114.59 109.82 108.94 108.29 106.84 108.28 112.90 115.09 117.36
2001 114.21 109.32 111.66 109.07 106.46 106.01 106.25 105.57 108.24 114.86 118.98 121.53
2002 113.12 105.17 108.37 103.56 103.11 103.07 104.22 104.29 108.19 116.82 122.87 125.70
2003 111.85 129.09 156.89 161.34 138.24 146.08 139.62 132.26 124.67 110.13 107.27 114.12
2004 104.33 120.89 116.06 114.30 107.70 109.12 106.74 107.86 137.11 109.81 115.25 118.96
2005 112.42 116.78 127.06 116.02 106.95 108.68 111.89 111.32 102.97 109.60 104.14 117.34
2006 117.08 108.45 106.39 107.46 102.18 110.43 110.30 105.88 116.86 107.84 128.28 105.68
2007 135.08 111.02 124.50 117.14 102.95 104.67 98.24 97.24 93.84 101.05 93.73 99.09
2008 99.77 105.71 106.17 113.21 101.38 91.44 91.49 98.37 102.91 93.86 93.72 105.87
2009 106.93 96.81 118.88 106.41 104.75 108.24 90.32 93.61 93.75 93.18 120.15 127.79
2010 130.06 135.65 120.44 109.39 107.11 103.98 97.93 104.89 99.31 99.98 96.08 100.12
2011 98.61 101.61 115.56 106.89 103.65 98.47 100.74 99.82 103.57 98.34 107.21 107.17
2012 100.92 100.43 102.82 95.80 108.95 95.35 92.66 96.50 96.40 93.52 86.56 89.12
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 4 6/26/2014
H-115
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 5.64 5.79 5.81 6.39 7.19 8.04 8.43 8.06 7.37 6.65 6.00 5.48
1998 5.98 6.06 6.10 6.71 7.47 8.40 8.73 8.30 7.55 6.83 6.20 5.69
1999 6.32 6.33 6.40 7.03 7.76 8.76 9.04 8.55 7.74 7.02 6.40 5.90
2000 6.65 6.60 6.69 7.35 8.04 9.12 9.34 8.79 7.92 7.21 6.61 6.11
2001 6.99 6.86 6.99 7.67 8.32 9.48 9.64 9.04 8.10 7.39 6.81 6.33
2002 7.33 7.13 7.28 7.99 8.60 9.84 9.95 9.28 8.28 7.58 7.01 6.54
2003 6.98 6.81 6.92 7.56 8.45 9.56 9.63 9.00 8.11 7.23 6.82 6.33
2004 6.64 6.49 6.56 7.14 8.29 9.28 9.32 8.72 7.94 6.88 6.63 6.12
2005 6.29 6.17 6.20 6.72 8.14 9.00 9.00 8.44 7.77 6.54 6.44 5.92
2006 5.94 5.84 5.83 6.30 7.99 8.72 8.69 8.16 7.60 6.19 6.25 5.71
2007 5.60 5.52 5.47 5.88 7.83 8.44 8.37 7.88 7.42 5.84 6.06 5.50
2008 5.98 6.18 6.05 6.52 7.20 8.73 8.46 8.44 7.14 6.36 5.83 5.34
2009 5.29 5.35 5.23 5.35 6.29 7.66 8.04 7.53 6.73 5.88 5.36 5.25
2010 5.71 5.40 5.55 6.00 6.79 7.95 8.26 7.92 7.07 6.05 5.61 5.38
2011 5.57 5.35 5.33 5.88 6.57 7.77 8.15 7.53 6.74 5.87 5.48 5.58
2012 5.10 5.14 5.18 5.86 6.29 7.60 8.26 7.54 6.94 5.79 5.68 6.31
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 5 6/26/2014
H-116
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.66 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.46 0.39 0.47 0.41 0.46 0.71 0.76 0.58
1998 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.64 0.46 0.40 0.46 0.43 0.48 0.70 0.74 0.62
1999 0.76 0.72 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.41 0.46 0.44 0.50 0.70 0.73 0.66
2000 0.81 0.71 0.78 0.60 0.47 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.51 0.70 0.71 0.69
2001 0.86 0.70 0.79 0.58 0.48 0.42 0.44 0.47 0.53 0.69 0.70 0.73
2002 0.91 0.69 0.81 0.56 0.48 0.43 0.44 0.48 0.55 0.69 0.68 0.77
2003 0.55 0.76 0.89 0.80 0.75 0.57 0.44 0.55 0.51 0.42 0.35 0.48
2004 0.43 0.70 0.50 0.40 0.31 0.53 0.41 0.47 0.61 0.42 0.57 0.56
2005 0.55 0.65 0.83 0.61 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.40 0.47 0.70
2006 0.66 0.51 0.55 0.53 0.42 0.54 0.36 0.43 0.53 0.51 0.84 0.68
2007 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.61 0.46 0.51 0.41 0.44 0.45 0.53 0.46 0.62
2008 0.61 0.66 0.73 0.87 0.61 0.45 0.48 0.56 0.63 0.49 0.57 0.80
2009 0.70 0.66 1.12 0.73 0.57 0.88 0.71 0.63 0.60 0.59 0.92 1.12
2010 1.16 1.46 1.19 0.83 1.06 0.86 0.84 0.78 0.79 0.67 0.70 0.75
2011 0.82 0.85 0.95 0.77 0.82 0.81 0.64 0.68 0.81 0.79 0.92 0.97
2012 0.89 0.88 0.93 0.77 0.80 0.81 0.69 0.70 0.77 0.74 0.70 0.77
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 6 6/26/2014
H-117
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 5.59 5.76 5.62 6.00 6.51 6.88 7.02 6.95 6.66 6.41 5.93 5.46
1998 5.83 5.92 5.79 6.21 6.68 7.09 7.21 7.06 6.71 6.44 5.98 5.49
1999 6.08 6.08 5.97 6.41 6.84 7.30 7.39 7.18 6.76 6.46 6.03 5.52
2000 6.32 6.24 6.15 6.62 7.01 7.51 7.57 7.29 6.81 6.49 6.08 5.55
2001 6.56 6.40 6.32 6.83 7.18 7.72 7.75 7.41 6.86 6.51 6.13 5.58
2002 6.81 6.56 6.50 7.03 7.34 7.93 7.93 7.52 6.90 6.54 6.18 5.61
2003 6.38 6.13 6.09 6.55 7.13 7.57 7.49 7.08 6.68 6.14 6.00 5.41
2004 5.94 5.70 5.68 6.08 6.91 7.20 7.05 6.63 6.45 5.74 5.82 5.21
2005 5.51 5.27 5.27 5.60 6.70 6.84 6.61 6.18 6.22 5.35 5.63 5.01
2006 5.08 4.84 4.86 5.12 6.48 6.47 6.17 5.73 6.00 4.95 5.45 4.81
2007 4.65 4.41 4.45 4.64 6.27 6.11 5.73 5.28 5.77 4.55 5.27 4.61
2008 5.22 5.30 5.22 5.48 5.51 6.42 5.91 6.22 5.53 5.26 4.94 4.32
2009 4.43 4.32 4.23 4.05 4.40 5.02 5.45 5.32 5.12 4.71 4.30 4.14
2010 4.76 4.46 4.68 4.82 5.39 5.94 5.79 5.73 5.31 5.01 4.74 4.37
2011 4.59 4.49 4.58 4.77 5.12 5.76 5.79 5.55 5.32 4.80 4.77 5.04
2012 4.42 4.51 4.49 4.73 4.85 5.59 5.78 5.36 5.33 4.60 4.80 5.72
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 7 6/26/2014
H-118
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.91 0.69 0.69 0.77 0.67 0.74 1.29 0.86 0.80 0.93 1.06 1.12
1998 0.97 0.59 0.60 0.64 0.58 0.64 1.06 0.83 0.70 0.84 0.97 0.95
1999 1.02 0.48 0.50 0.51 0.49 0.54 0.83 0.80 0.60 0.75 0.88 0.79
2000 1.08 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.39 0.45 0.60 0.78 0.50 0.66 0.79 0.63
2001 1.14 0.27 0.32 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.37 0.75 0.39 0.56 0.70 0.47
2002 1.20 0.17 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.25 0.14 0.72 0.29 0.47 0.61 0.31
2003 0.23 0.48 0.66 0.52 0.81 0.31 0.37 0.61 0.37 0.14 0.93 0.16
2004 0.13 0.43 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.25 0.19 0.50 1.03 0.20 0.23 0.22
2005 0.51 0.23 1.46 0.28 0.13 0.32 0.39 0.14 0.10 0.33 0.40 0.61
2006 0.21 0.11 0.19 0.16 0.07 0.23 0.12 0.80 0.16 0.43 0.24 0.24
2007 0.54 0.17 0.16 0.21 0.08 0.19 0.08 0.15 0.14 0.51 0.04 0.02
2008 0.13 0.13 0.46 0.40 0.10 0.06 0.89 0.44 1.41 0.66 0.05 0.13
2009 0.48 0.06 0.57 0.36 0.23 0.19 0.38 0.04 0.64 0.54 0.95 0.31
2010 0.58 0.46 0.39 0.06 0.65 0.30 0.25 0.29 0.23 0.20 0.09 0.06
2011 0.10 0.26 0.54 0.38 0.17 0.12 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.19 0.12 0.37
2012 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.05 0.56 0.40 0.12 0.32 0.26 0.05 0.02 0.56
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 8 6/26/2014
H-119
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN FALLS RESERVOIR
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
1998 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
1999 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2000 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2001 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2002 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2003 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2004 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2005 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2006 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2007 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2008 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2009 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2010 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2011 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
2012 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 9 6/26/2014
H-120
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN FALLS RESERVOIR
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1998 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1999 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2004 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2006 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2011 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2012 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 10 6/26/2014
H-121
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN LAKE TILLERY
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 11.68 11.68 12.34 14.46 17.93 23.06 25.55 23.19 18.60 14.62 12.39 10.69
1998 12.00 12.16 12.45 14.67 18.06 23.28 25.86 23.67 18.79 14.70 12.47 11.07
1999 12.32 12.64 12.56 14.88 18.20 23.51 26.16 24.15 18.98 14.78 12.55 11.46
2000 12.64 13.12 12.67 15.10 18.34 23.73 26.47 24.64 19.17 14.87 12.62 11.85
2001 12.96 13.59 12.78 15.31 18.48 23.95 26.78 25.12 19.36 14.95 12.70 12.24
2002 13.28 14.07 12.89 15.52 18.62 24.17 27.09 25.60 19.55 15.03 12.78 12.63
2003 13.01 13.78 13.09 15.62 18.91 24.28 27.16 25.95 20.04 15.61 13.16 12.66
2004 12.74 13.48 13.29 15.71 19.21 24.39 27.23 26.29 20.53 16.19 13.54 12.69
2005 12.46 13.19 13.49 15.81 19.50 24.49 27.31 26.63 21.03 16.76 13.92 12.72
2006 12.19 12.89 13.68 15.90 19.80 24.60 27.38 26.97 21.52 17.34 14.29 12.76
2007 11.92 12.60 13.88 16.00 20.09 24.71 27.46 27.31 22.01 17.92 14.67 12.79
2008 13.65 13.51 14.08 15.53 18.51 26.08 28.30 26.69 20.87 16.99 14.32 13.48
2009 12.35 11.60 12.06 14.14 16.81 22.42 26.03 24.19 19.51 14.49 11.07 10.55
2010 10.58 10.20 11.18 13.52 16.96 22.77 24.98 23.04 18.58 13.33 11.31 9.87
2011 9.66 10.25 10.96 12.56 16.26 22.19 24.70 21.89 17.18 13.49 11.00 9.94
2012 9.61 10.03 10.88 13.11 16.52 21.85 25.16 22.56 17.79 13.43 11.01 10.14
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 11 6/26/2014
H-122
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN LAKE TILLERY
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 0.82 0.99 0.83 0.89 0.69 0.34 0.75 0.24 0.39 0.48 0.80 0.97
1998 0.84 0.93 0.83 0.82 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.27 0.40 0.56 0.86 1.05
1999 0.86 0.86 0.84 0.75 0.58 0.33 0.57 0.30 0.40 0.64 0.91 1.13
2000 0.88 0.80 0.84 0.68 0.52 0.32 0.48 0.33 0.41 0.72 0.96 1.21
2001 0.90 0.74 0.84 0.61 0.47 0.31 0.39 0.36 0.42 0.80 1.01 1.29
2002 0.92 0.68 0.85 0.54 0.41 0.31 0.30 0.39 0.42 0.88 1.07 1.37
2003 0.75 1.24 1.68 1.41 1.39 1.28 0.94 1.29 0.61 0.38 0.36 0.34
2004 0.35 0.96 0.69 0.42 0.55 0.44 0.39 0.51 1.01 0.53 0.59 0.60
2005 0.65 0.77 1.25 0.98 0.48 0.62 0.69 0.66 0.40 0.49 0.38 0.98
2006 0.61 0.30 0.38 0.65 0.48 0.68 0.52 0.57 0.75 0.55 1.39 0.94
2007 1.20 0.85 0.73 0.42 0.21 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.17 0.41
2008 0.49 0.53 0.76 0.77 0.31 0.20 0.14 0.18 0.32 0.22 0.25 0.75
2009 0.44 0.36 1.11 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.96 1.17
2010 1.13 1.27 0.74 0.32 0.35 0.39 0.15 0.35 0.28 0.19 0.19 0.29
2011 0.37 0.51 0.66 0.39 0.32 0.39 0.44 0.42 0.34 0.51 0.62 0.61
2012 0.68 0.61 0.60 0.34 0.34 0.25 0.29 0.41 0.42 0.37 0.27 0.32
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 12 6/26/2014
H-123
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WITHDRAWALS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 56.12 55.93 55.05 64.31 78.65 98.18 109.14 100.64 82.22 65.31 55.01 47.87
1998 55.23 54.77 54.54 64.68 78.83 99.40 109.55 100.91 81.75 65.44 55.25 48.21
1999 54.33 53.60 54.03 65.04 79.00 100.63 109.95 101.18 81.28 65.57 55.48 48.55
2000 54.15 53.04 54.40 65.95 79.72 103.75 112.43 104.31 82.49 66.81 56.36 49.76
2001 53.25 51.87 53.89 66.31 79.90 104.98 112.84 104.59 82.02 66.94 56.60 50.10
2002 52.36 50.71 53.38 66.67 80.07 106.20 113.24 104.86 81.55 67.07 56.84 50.44
2003 53.19 51.87 55.11 67.91 81.84 106.99 114.83 107.55 84.31 68.99 57.91 51.44
2004 54.03 53.02 56.83 69.15 83.60 107.78 116.43 110.24 87.06 70.91 58.99 52.43
2005 54.86 54.18 58.56 70.39 85.37 108.57 118.15 112.37 89.74 72.10 59.48 53.53
2006 54.99 54.81 60.42 71.35 87.30 108.70 119.77 115.55 91.91 74.33 60.98 54.17
2007 56.66 57.23 62.05 73.70 89.27 110.33 121.16 118.36 95.94 75.79 61.71 55.13
2008 58.73 57.11 61.16 62.71 76.68 101.96 110.58 103.71 81.98 66.44 54.69 47.75
2009 54.54 53.12 58.01 64.79 77.95 101.66 114.11 103.73 86.24 73.61 62.87 53.43
2010 51.33 52.74 53.07 63.04 76.98 99.16 109.71 99.10 84.66 67.02 59.30 47.49
2011 53.19 54.23 58.62 65.73 83.22 108.98 119.91 109.54 88.98 73.54 62.79 58.17
2012 54.74 53.69 56.77 66.64 81.12 103.08 115.35 105.34 84.71 68.29 58.11 51.26
DATA TRANSMITTED ON: 6/24/14
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 13 6/26/2014
H-124
Appendix B - Water Use by Reservoir Basin
SUBBASIN BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
RETURNS (CFS)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1997 75.41 81.88 78.41 78.89 69.61 65.09 73.45 67.14 69.39 70.13 72.38 75.67
1998 75.66 80.30 77.88 76.70 68.40 64.27 70.96 66.15 68.36 70.58 73.84 76.30
1999 75.92 78.72 77.36 74.51 67.19 63.44 68.48 65.15 67.33 71.03 75.30 76.94
2000 76.17 77.14 76.84 72.33 65.99 62.62 65.99 64.15 66.30 71.48 76.77 77.57
2001 76.43 75.56 76.32 70.14 64.78 61.80 63.51 63.16 65.27 71.93 78.23 78.21
2002 76.68 73.98 75.79 67.95 63.57 60.97 61.02 62.16 64.24 72.39 79.69 78.85
2003 67.11 90.03 105.46 109.94 99.64 95.91 81.72 80.64 65.40 61.48 60.92 68.61
2004 62.24 92.43 75.74 69.73 63.17 66.71 64.89 67.22 86.49 68.00 68.54 69.97
2005 69.85 76.77 87.44 80.86 64.38 72.84 70.94 70.22 60.57 66.07 63.97 82.35
2006 76.19 69.40 68.07 65.91 63.79 70.55 62.05 70.26 73.46 69.71 85.97 72.44
2007 86.51 80.51 81.99 76.09 66.32 68.15 64.55 65.10 64.17 64.64 60.45 63.99
2008 64.23 69.06 74.24 74.07 63.15 56.29 57.29 67.84 66.40 60.28 59.46 75.44
2009 68.12 64.21 88.72 69.98 64.48 62.86 61.11 59.79 59.30 59.41 74.84 84.03
2010 83.61 91.48 77.04 63.89 64.30 67.68 61.56 63.46 60.07 57.36 54.66 58.54
2011 59.68 66.69 74.23 70.03 66.75 63.36 60.21 61.50 63.87 64.23 67.74 69.27
2012 75.33 70.78 68.62 62.03 64.88 60.24 60.02 65.88 65.01 61.05 57.12 60.83
UCYR_WSS_CHEOPS_Data_1997_2012_20140624.xlsx B - 14 6/26/2014
H-125
CD-4.2 APPENDIX CD – 4.2
Summary – Yadkin-Pee
Dee Water Supply
Projections Basis and
Results
H-126
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 1
T e c h n i c a l M e m o r a n d u m
PROJECT: Union County Yadkin River Water Supply Project – Permitting and Preliminary
Engineering
DATE: October 23, 2014
SUBJECT: Water Supply Projections for Water Supply Modeling – Basis and Results
BACKGROUND As part of the comprehensive evaluation for securing a reliable water supply to serve customers in its
Yadkin River Basin service area, the Union County Public Works Department (UCPW) has authorized
HDR to provide Permitting and Preliminary Engineering assistance for the County’s Yadkin River Water
Supply Project (YRWSP). One of the tasks is to provide technical evaluations to support these permitting
efforts. As part of these evaluations, HDR will develop a water supply model for a portion of the Yadkin
River Basin (Basin). This modeling effort requires net withdrawal (withdrawals minus returns) projections
for water use within each watershed of the Basin. Those using the Yadkin River Basin for water supply
purposes can generally be grouped into the following major categories:
� Public Water Supplies and Wastewater Utilities – Municipal and other utility agencies with
systems that withdraw and treat water for public consumption and residential, commercial, and
industrial use, as well as those systems that treat wastewater and return it to a surface water
source.
� Direct Industrial – These industrial users have direct withdrawals and/or returns from surface
water sources and utilize water in their manufacturing processes.
� Thermal-Electric Power – The thermal-electric power facilities within the Basin that use water for
cooling and other energy production needs.
� Agricultural and Irrigation – Agricultural and irrigation (A&I) users include farms, golf courses,
and other facilities that use water for livestock production, irrigation, and other purposes.
For the purposes of the water quantity model, the Basin was delineated into seven incremental
watersheds. Additionally, an eighth watershed, from below Blewett Falls Lake to the North Carolina –
South Carolina state line, is being evaluated for water use outside of the water quantity model through a
post-processing routine. These watersheds are listed below from the most upstream reservoir to the most
downstream reservoir in the Yadkin Basin.
� W. Kerr Scott Reservoir
� High Rock Lake
� Tuckertown Reservoir
� Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)
H-127
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 2
� Falls Reservoir
� Lake Tillery
� Blewett Falls Lake
� Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake to NC-SC state line (evaluated through post-processing
routine)
The boundaries of the Basin and watershed locations being used in the modeling effort are provided in
Figure 1. As can be seen from the map, only a very small portion of the Basin being modeled is located
within South Carolina. The area of the Basin within South Carolina was examined through aerial mapping
sources and there appears to be no major water users in that area. Additionally, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
website was evaluated for the portion of Chesterfield County within the Basin, and there are no
discharges in that area. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Controls
(SCDHEC) was also contacted to determine if any withdrawals or returns exist in that portion of the state,
and concurred that there are none. Based on this evaluation, South Carolina was not included in the
evaluation of water uses for modeling purposes, with the exception of the A&I category, as described
below.
As shown in Figure 1, there is a model subbasin within North Carolina (“Downstream of Blewett Falls
Lake”) that appears to lie outside the Yadkin River Basin. However, Figure 2 shows how this subbasin
area is in fact included in the Yadkin River Basin, as part of the Lower Pee Dee River Basin, according to
the subbasin delineations published by the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). This sub-basin is below the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) regulated reservoirs and thus was considered in the modeling effort through a post-
processing routine.
Also shown on Figure 1 is a small portion of the Basin is within the Commonwealth of Virginia. The area
shown is rural, and no major water users have been identified within this area; therefore, Virginia was not
included in the evaluation of water use, except for the A&I category.
This document summarizes the entities being evaluated, the sources for historical data, the methodology
for developing water supply projections to determine net withdrawals for each watershed in the CHEOPS
water quantity model for the Basin, and the results of the water supply projections.
PROJECTION METHODOLOGY The proceeding sections describe how historical data was gathered and projections developed for each of
the four water user categories. In compiling the list of current users, the focus was on those users that
currently withdraw or return from a surface water source an average annual daily rate of 100,000 gpd or
more from the Basin. While numerous users may withdraw or return water at rates less than 100,000
gpd, their impact on net withdrawal from the watersheds of each reservoir was considered insignificant for
the long-term water quantity modeling effort. Also, the net withdrawal produced by these users would be
very small relative to the overall net withdrawal resulting from the users documented in the projections.
For the North Carolina users, several databases were provided by the North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The databases included
information from the Local Water Supply Plans (1997 to 2012), Water Withdrawal and Transfer
H-128
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 3
Registrations (1999 to 2012), and NPDES discharge data (1997 to 2014). This data was used to
determine the appropriate entities to include in the evaluation, intake and discharge locations, and to
obtain monthly historical water use data.
The historical water use data in the NDDWR databases was not used directly as a model input. Rather,
the historical databases were aggregated into one Excel reference file, which was used to compile the
model input values for both historical and projected flows. For historical flows, gaps in the data (missing
months) were filled in by interpolating between known data points. For projection values, the average
value from 2010 to 2012 in a given month was used as the basis (“Base Year”) for making projections.
Water withdrawal and returns were projected to the year 2060.
In the databases received by NCDWR, the data is separated by subbasin. However, these subbasin
divisions are different than those watersheds being used for the water quantity model. Figure 2 shows
the modeling watersheds with the NCDWR subbasins overlaid for reference. Figure 3 shows all of the
water users being considered in this evaluation, with the modeling watersheds and County boundaries
shown for reference. The entity list with the name of the facilities is also shown on Figure 3.
H-129
Santee
Upper Pee Dee (Yadkin)
Lower Pee Dee
RoanokeKanawha
Cape Fear
Santee
Overall Basin Map with Modeling SubbasinsFigure 1
Union County | Yadkin River Water Supply Project - Permitting and Preliminary Engineering | Basis of Water Supply Projection
\\clts
main\
gis_d
ata\G
IS\Pr
ojects
\0002
40_U
nionC
ounty
\0214
323_
UCYR
WSPP
ermit-P
relim
Eng\m
ap_d
ocs\m
xd\Te
chnic
al Me
mo fig
ures\T
M_Fig
ure_1
_rev.m
xd | L
ast U
pdate
d: 10
.15.20
14
LegendOverall River Basins
SubbasinsW. Kerr Scott ReservoirHigh Rock LakeTuckertown ReservoirNarrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)Falls ReservoirLake TilleryBlewett Falls LakeDownstream of Blewett Falls Lake
.
H-130
18-1Yadkin River
18-4Rocky River
18-2South Yadkin River
18-3Uwharrie River
Modeling Subbasins with NCDWR Subbasins OverlaidFigure 2
Union County | Yadkin River Water Supply Project - Permitting and Preliminary Engineering | Basis of Water Supply Projection
\\clts
main\
gis_d
ata\G
IS\Pr
ojects
\0002
40_U
nionC
ounty
\0214
323_
UCYR
WSPP
ermit-P
relim
Eng\m
ap_d
ocs\m
xd\Te
chnic
al Me
mo fig
ures\T
M_Fig
ure_2
_rev.m
xd | L
ast U
pdate
d: 10
.15.20
14
LegendNCDWR Subbasins
SubbasinsW. Kerr Scott ReservoirHigh Rock LakeTuckertown ReservoirNarrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)Falls ReservoirLake TilleryBlewett Falls LakeDownstream of Blewett Falls Lake
.
H-131
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(89
88
87
86 85
84
83
81
78
75
93
71
67
66
64 63
62
60
59
58
56
55
52
45
34
16
13
11
92
09
04
01
88b
77c
77a
76d
76c76b76a
74a
73b73a
72b72a
70c70b
69b
69a
68a
65c65b65a
61b61a
46b
40b
35b
30f
30e
30d
30b
28d
28c
27b
25f
25e
25d
25c
25b
25a
24b24a
23c23b
23a
90c90b
90a
21c21b
21a
20d
20b
19c
19a
18b
17c17b
91b91a
15d15b
14d14c
14a
94c
08b
05c05b
03e
03d
42
02
74b
70a
68b
46a
40a
35c35a 30g
30c
30a
28b
28a
27a
22b22a
20c
20a
19b
18a
17a
15a
14b
94b94a
08a
03c03b03a76a(F)
York County
Wilkes County
Union County
Randolph County
Fairfield CountyKershaw County
Iredell County
Surry County
Guilford County
Chesterfield County
Anson County
Chester County
Rowan County
Davidson County
Lee County
Stokes County
Lancaster County
Darlington County
Ashe County
Stanly County
Patrick CountyGrayson County
Forsyth County
Rockingham County
Henry County
Mecklenburg County
Richmond County
Marlboro County
Catawba County
Montgomery County
Richland County
Gaston County
Newberry County
Carroll County
Florence County
Yadkin County
Union County
Caldwell County
Cabarrus CountyCleveland County
Lincoln County
Davie County
Moore County
Alexander County
Burke County
Cherokee County
Alleghany County
Smyth County
Lexington County Sumter County
Watauga County
Saluda County
Water-Using Entities Considered in the Current StudyFigure 3
Union County | Yadkin River Water Supply Project - Permitting and Preliminary Engineering | Basis of Water Supply Projection
\\clts
main\
gis_d
ata\G
IS\Pr
ojects
\0002
40_U
nionC
ounty
\0214
323_
UCYR
WSPP
ermit-P
relim
Eng\m
ap_d
ocs\m
xd\Te
chnic
al Me
mo fig
ures\T
M_Fig
ure_3
_rev.m
xd | L
ast U
pdate
d: 11
.14.20
14
LegendWater-Using Facilities!( Water-Withdrawing Facilities!( Water-Returning Facilities
SubbasinsW. Kerr Scott ReservoirHigh Rock LakeTuckertown ReservoirNarrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)Falls ReservoirLake TilleryBlewett Falls LakeDownstream of Blewett Falls Lake
.ID No. Entity Facility ID No. Entity Facility ID No. Entity Facility ID No. Entity Facility
01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc ATI Allvac Monroe Plant 23a City of Statesville City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River) 45 PPG Ind. Fiber Glass Products PPG Industries Fiber Glass Products 73a Tow n of Yadkinville Yadkinville WTP02 Aluminum Company Of America Badin Works 23b City of Statesville Fourth Creek WWTP 46a/b Performance Fibers, Inc Salisbury Facility 73b Tow n of Yadkinville Yadkinville WWTP
03a-e Anson County Anson County Filtration Plant 23c City of Statesville Third Creek WWTP 52 Stanly County West Stanly WWTP 74a True Textiles, Inc True Elkin, Inc.04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc Country Wood WWTP 24a City of Thomasville City of Thomasville WTP 55 Teledyne Allvac Monroe Plant 74b True Textiles, Inc 304 East Main Street Plant05b Asheboro W. L. Brow n Jr WTP (Lake Lucas) 24b City of Thomasville Hamby Creek WWTP 56 The Fork, LLC The Fork, LLC 75 Tyson Foods, Inc Harmony Plant05c Asheboro W. L. Brow n Jr WTP (Lake Reese) 25a City of Winston-Salem Archie Elledge WWTP 58 Tow n of Bermuda Run Bermuda Run WWTP 76a Union County Public Works Crooked Creek WWTP #2
08a/b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp Patterson Mill 25b City of Winston-Salem Muddy Creek WWTP 59 Tow n of Biscoe Biscoe WWTP 76b Union County Public Works Hunley Creek WWTP09 Bradfield Farms Water Company Bradfield Farms WWTP 25c/e City of Winston-Salem P. W. Sw ann WTP 60 Tow n of Boonville Boonville WWTP 76c Union County Public Works Grassy Branch WWTP11 Carolina Water Service Inc of NC Hemby Acres WWTP 25d City of Winston-Salem R. A. Thomas WTP 61a Tow n of Denton Denton WP 76d Union County Public Works Tallw ood Estates WWTP13 CMUD Mallard Creek WWTP 25f City of Winston-Salem R.W. Neilson WTP 61b Tow n of Denton Denton WWTP 77a WSA of Cabarrus County Mt. Pleasant WTF14a City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP 27a Davidson Water Inc C. O. Pickle WP 62 Tow n of Dobson Dobson WWTP 77c WSA of Cabarrus County Rocky River WWTP (WSACC)
14b/c City of Albemarle Tuckertow n WTP 27b Davidson Water Inc Davidson Water WTP 63 Tow n of Elkin Elkin Municipal WTP 78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn Dobson Plant14d City of Albemarle US 52 HWY WTP 28a Davie County Cooleemee WTP 64 Tow n of Jonesville Jonesville WP 81 Yadkin Valley Sew er Authority, Inc Yadkin Valley S.A. WWTP
15a/b City of Concord Coddle Creek WTP 28b/c Davie County Sparks Road WTP 65a Tow n of Mocksville Hugh A. Lagle WTP 83 Carolina Stalite Company Carolina Stalite Company15d City of Concord Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher) 28d Davie County Cooleemee WWTP 65b Tow n of Mocksville Bear Creek WWTP 84 City of Charlotte Cabarrus Woods WWTP16 City of High Point Westside WWTP 30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Buck Steam Station 65c Tow n of Mocksville Dutchman Creek WWTP 85 Norfolk Southern Railw ay Company Linw ood Yard
17a/b/c City of Kannapolis City of Kannapolis WTP 30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Buck Combined Cycle Station 66 Tow n of Mooresville Rocky River WWTP 86 Tow n of Cleveland Cleveland WWTP18a/b City of King City of King WTP 30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Smith Energy Complex 67 Tow n of Mount Gilead Mount Gilead WWTP 87 Energy United Water Energy United Water WTP19a City of Lexington Lexington Regional WWTP 30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 68a Tow n of North Wilkesboro North Wilkesboro WP 88/88b Richmond County Richmond County WTP19b City of Lexington Lexington WTP #1 & 2 30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 68b Tow n of North Wilkesboro Thurman Street WWTP 89 Wilkes County Wilkes County WTP (Future)19c City of Lexington Lexington WTP (Lake Thom-A-Lex) 30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Nuclear Plant #1 69a Tow n of Norw ood Norw ood WTP 90a City of Rockingham Rockingham WWTP
20a/b City of Monroe John Glenn WTP 30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Nuclear Plant #2 69b Tow n of Norw ood Norw ood WWTP 90b/c City of Rockingham Rockingham WTP20c/d City of Monroe Monroe WWTP 34 Greater Badin W&SD Badin WWTP 70a/b Tow n of Pilot Mountain Pilot Mountain WTP 91a City of Hamlet Hamlet WTP21a City of Mount Airy F. G. Doggett WTP 35a/b/c Hedrick Industries Aquadale Quarry 70c Tow n of Pilot Mountain Pilot Mountain WWTP 91b City of Hamlet Hamlet WWTP21b City of Mount Airy Mount Airy WWTP 40a Louisiana Pacif ic Corporation Lousiana Pacif ic Corporation 71 Tow n of Troy Troy WWTP 92 Burlington Industries LLC Richmond Plant21c City of Mount Airy S. L. Spencer WTP 40b Louisiana Pacif ic Corporation LP Roaring River WWTP 72a Tow n of Wilkesboro Cub Creek WWTP 93 Tow n of Wadesboro Tow n of Wadesboro WTP22a City of Salisbury Salisbury WTP 42 Montgomery County Montgomery County WTP 72b Tow n of Wilkesboro Wilkesboro WFP 94a/b/c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Hedrick Mine (Pump House 1/2/3)22b City of Salisbury Salisbury-Row an WWTP
H-132
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 7
Public Water Supplies and Wastewater Utilities � Historical Data Source: Databases provided by NCDWR. Monthly withdrawal and discharge data
for each year from 2007-2012 were analyzed to determine annual averages. Monthly coefficients
based on the monthly average divided by the annual average were calculated using the historical
data record of each entity for use in the water quantity model.
� Projection Methodology
o Projections for water withdrawals were based on the projected annual growth rate (AGR)
of the County being served for the majority of the entities. The projected AGR takes into
account historical population data for the state from the 2010 Census and population
projections prepared by the North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management. For
larger entities in the basin, the projections from the Local Water Supply Plans were used.
This alternate methodology was chosen because growth was assumed to occur in the
larger cities at a faster rate than the overall County AGR. Local Water Supply Plan
projections were not used for all withdrawal entities because some entities’ projections
appeared intuitively incorrect – either overly aggressive (i.e., growth rates far exceeding
historic values) or overly conservative (i.e., negative growth rates). Using the Census
AGR values (or if the Census AGR was low, a minimum AGR of 0.25%) for these entities
provided a reasonable growth projection without giving undue weight to any one entity’s
projections. The notes in each of the detailed entity sheets denote whether an AGR
projection or a Local Water Supply Plan projection was used for that entity.
o For water treatment plant backwash returns, the average historical backwash return as a
percentage of water use from 2010 to 2012 was applied to the water withdrawal
projections.
o The wastewater treatment plant projections for returns were based on the projected
annual growth rate for the County being served or the average historical return as a
percentage of water use from 2010 to 2012 applied to the water withdrawal projections,
depending on the methodology used for the withdrawal projections.
Direct Industrial � Historical Data Source – Databases provided by NCDWR. Monthly withdrawal and discharge
data for each year from 2007-2012 were analyzed to determine annual averages. Monthly
coefficients based on the monthly average divided by the annual average were calculated using
the historical data record of each entity for use in the water quantity model.
� Projection Methodology – The projections for industrial withdrawals and returns were based on
the specific industry and the gross state product (GSP) for that industrial sector. Historical data
from the Bureau of Economic Analysis from 1997-2012 was used to calculate a long term GSP
growth percentage for the specific industry sector. The overall GSP growth percentage for
industry in North Carolina was also used as a reference. If the industrial sector showed a
negative GSP growth percentage, a zero percentage growth was assigned in the projections to
be conservative. An estimate for future industry was also added to the projections. This
assumed 0.5 MGD per year in the smaller basins (Tuckertown Reservoir, Badin Lake and Falls
Reservoir), 1 MGD per year in the larger basins (High Rock Lake, Lake Tillery and Blewett Falls
Lake) and no future industry in the W. Kerr Scott Reservoir basin.
H-133
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 8
Thermal Electric Power � The only thermal-electric power facility in the Basin that meets the criteria for water supply
evaluation outlined in this document is Duke Energy’s Buck Combined Cycle facility. Duke
Energy provided historical use and projections for this facility. The Smith Energy Complex (Duke
Energy combined cycle facility) also receives water from the Yadkin basin through the Richmond
County water system. Historical data for the Smith Energy Complex was received from
Richmond County and projections were provided by Duke Energy. Future power facility
projections were also provided by Duke Energy. These included two potential future additional
combined cycle stations, one in High Rock Lake and one in an upstream tributary of High Rock
Lake, and two potential future nuclear plants, one in Blewett Falls Lake and one in Lake Tillery.
Agricultural and Irrigation (A&I) � Historical Data Source: Data were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in five-year
increments for North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia, on a per-county basis (USGS, 2014).
The USGS data provided crop plus golf (combined) and livestock surface water withdrawals
between 1990 and 2000. In 2005, water usage data were further disaggregated into separate
crop, livestock, and golf course surface water withdrawal categories.
� Projection Methodology: A&I users required a multi-step process to project usage within the
Basin. Data on specific agricultural and irrigation withdrawals are limited. Therefore, the
following approach was used to forecast A&I usage. It should be noted that the A&I forecasts
incorporate four main assumptions.
o A&I water withdrawals are completely consumptive (i.e., no surface returns). The majority of
A&I water used for irrigation and livestock is consumed and is not returned to the Basin.
o A&I water withdrawals for a given county are consumed uniformly over that county’s land
area. In the absence of more detailed land use data, A&I water use is assumed to be
distributed equally throughout the county.
o The percentage of a county’s land area within a particular reservoir’s watershed is
commensurate with the percentage of that county’s total A&I water withdrawal taken from that
watershed. For example, if 25 percent of a county’s land area resides within a particular
watershed, it was assumed 25 percent of that county’s A&I water demand is satisfied by the
reservoir associated with that watershed. In the absence of more detailed land use data and
changing land use in the Basin, this approach was used.
o Private irrigation by individual residential properties directly from Project reservoirs is
considered to represent a negligible impact on the net withdrawals from the Project
reservoirs. While there may be numerous residential irrigation users, their average daily
withdrawals are relatively small relative to other user types in this evaluation. Additionally,
because these properties are adjacent, or nearly adjacent, to the reservoirs, much of the
water withdrawn is likely transferred into the groundwater and feeds back into the reservoirs.
Projections were completed for each watershed within the Basin. For example, A&I usage was
calculated for Lake Tillery separately from Blewett Falls Lake. A GIS database was developed to
determine the percentage of each county that lies in each watershed within the Basin.
H-134
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 9
The water withdrawal trends for A&I were evaluated from 1990 through 2005. The A&I water use
reported in the USGS database varies considerably between reporting years, and no definitive
trend in water use (increase or decrease) exists. Therefore, the use of an AGR for water use
projections is not relevant for the A&I category. Instead, to forecast A&I water withdrawals for
each county, the greatest water withdrawal from the 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005 USGS datasets
was selected as the county water use for all future A&I consumption, by category. For each
category (golf, crop, and livestock), these values were multiplied by the percentage of each
county that lies within each reservoir’s watershed. This value serves as the basis for A&I water
use projections for each watershed, and is the same value for each projection decade (i.e., no
increase or decrease in A&I water use over the Study Period).
A monthly coefficient was established for the A&I water withdrawals to account for irrigation use
trends during the irrigation season of each year. North Carolina Agricultural Use Data from 2009-
2011 was used from the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Data
for irrigation and livestock withdrawals, not including aquaculture, was used. The monthly
coefficient was developed by taking the 2009-2011 average monthly withdrawals divided by the
total average yearly withdrawals for those years.
RESULTS The following summarizes the withdrawals, returns and net withdrawal projections for the Yadkin-Pee
Dee River Basin using the methodology described above. The first set of results is summarized based on
each of the major user categories for the entire basin. Figure 4 shows the projections for the Public
Water Supplies and Wastewater Utilities. As this figure shows, the withdrawals and returns grow at a
similar rate to 2060, resulting in the net withdrawal remaining fairly constant through the projection period.
One of the reasons for this is there are several entities that withdraw water from outside of the basin, but
return it within the basin. Also, for those entities that the wastewater returns were projected based on the
average return as a percentage of water use, the percentages were fairly high, with many exceeding
90%. This could be indicative of systems with high inflow and infiltration in the collection system.
Figure 4
Drought
0
50
100
150
200
250
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060
Pro
ject
ed
Flo
w (
MG
D)
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
for All Subbasins for Public Water/Wastewater Utilities (Baseline)
Withdrawals Returns Net Withdrawals
H-135
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 10
Figure 5 provides the projections for the Direct Industrial category. All but one of the existing industries
had a negative GSP for the industrial sector. Zero percent growth was used for these industries, as
shown by the constant projections. The future industrial flows were added in 2020, thus the increase to
industrial flows shown at that time. The irregular shape of the historical data in years 2007 to 2012 is
driven by the Hedrick Mine in the Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake subbasin; Hedrick’s flows fluctuated
greatly during that time period.
Figure 5
Figure 6 shows the projections for the Power category. All power use is shown as a net withdrawal.
These projections include an additional combined cycle plant in the time frame of 2020 to 2049 and an
additional combined cycle plant and two nuclear plants in 2050.
Figure 6
Drought-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060
Pro
ject
ed
Flo
w (
MG
D)
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
for All Subbasins for All Categories - Industrial (Baseline)
Withdrawals Returns Net Withdrawals
Drought
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060
Pro
ject
ed
Flo
w (
MG
D)
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
for All Subbasins for All Categories - Power (Baseline)
Withdrawals Returns Net Withdrawals
H-136
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 11
Figure 7 shows the results of the Agricultural and Irrigation (A&I) projections. All A&I use was considered
a net withdrawal. The AI& projections were developed based on a constant net withdrawal over the
projection period using the greatest withdrawal data from the USGS data as the basis.
Figure 7
Drought
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060
Pro
ject
ed
Flo
w (
MG
D)
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
for All Subbasins for All Categories - Agricultural/Irrigation (Baseline)
Withdrawals Returns Net Withdrawals
H-137
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 12
Figure 8 provides the withdrawals, returns and net withdrawals for all categories by subbasin for the Base
Year, which is the average of 2010 to 2012.
Figure 8
H-138
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 13
Figure 9 provides the withdrawals, returns and net withdrawals for all categories by subbasin in 2060.
Figure 9
H-139
Water Supply Projections – Basis and Results 14
SUMMARY The projected net withdrawals depicted in Figure 8 and Figure 9, above, are driven by a series of
circumstances and assumptions captured in the model. One circumstance is the high rate of return
exhibited by public water and wastewater utilities - many entities return more than 90% of the water that
they withdraw. This value is higher than typical, but can be partially explained by high inflow and
infiltration (I&I) in the wastewater collection systems. Additionally, there is significant inter-basin transfer
(IBT) occurring from the Catawba River Basin to the Yadkin River Basin. This inflates the return flow
values and creates the appearance of higher-than-actual rates of return for some public utilities. Finally,
the rural nature of the Yadkin River Basin means there are few large municipalities or industries to
withdraw water for consumptive use (e.g. lawn irrigation); this reduces the net withdrawals compared to
more highly-developed basins in the state.
One factor that drives the projections toward higher consumptive use is the increase in projected
withdrawals for power facilities beginning in the base year and increasing step-wise through 2060 as new
facilities come online. Power utilities within the region project the need for these new facilities to meet
increasing base load power demands throughout their service areas as future population increases.
These power facility flows represent a large fraction of the projected withdrawals in 2060 for the Lake
Tillery and Blewett Falls Lake basins, and a smaller but still significant fraction of the 2060 High Rock
Lake basin withdrawals.
H-140
CD-4.3 APPENDIX CD – 4.3
Yadkin Water Supply
Analysis – Legend
H-141
Legend/Acronym List
Code Name Description Master Code
Part 1 of Entity ID:
State/Area
N North Carolina Code used for entities within the state of North Carolina N
S South Carolina Code used for entities within the state of South Carolina S
Part 2 of Entity ID:
Water Supply
W Withdrawal Code for an entity's facility that withdraws water W
R Return Code for an entity's facility that discharges water R
N Net Withdrawal Net Outflow is the difference between withdrawals and discharges. N
Part 3 of Entity ID:
Subbasins
W W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR W. Kerr Scott Reservoir Subbasin W
H HIGH ROCK LAKE High Rock Lake Subbasin H
T TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR Tuckertown Reservoir Subbasin T
N NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) Subbasin N
F FALLS RESERVOIR Falls Reservoir Subbasin F
L LAKE TILLERY Lake Tillery Subbasin L
B BLEWETT FALLS LAKE Blewett Falls Lake Subbasin B
D DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake Subbasin (NC) D
Part 4 of Entity ID:
Unique ID Number
# Unique number for each entity; letters after the number designate different facilities within that entity. #
Category
PW/WU Public Water/Wastewater Utilities City utilities withdrawing or discharging water PW/WU
PW/WU (D) Public Water/Wastewater Utilities ‐ Domestic For‐profit utilities withdrawing or discharging water PW/WU
TEP Power Entities/Facilities producing Thermo‐Electric Power TEP
TEP‐F Power ‐ New Future Power Entities/Facilities projected to produce Thermo‐Electric Power in the
future
TEP
IND Industrial Industrial facilities that direct withdrawing and/or discharging water IND
IND‐F Industrial ‐ New Future Industry Industrial facilities projected to make direct withdrawals and/or
discharges in the future
IND
A/I Agricultural/Irrigation Entity specific agricultural or irrigation A/I
A/I (CL) Agricultural/Irrigation (Crop & Livestock) County‐wide "crop" and "livestock" A/I
A/I (CGL) Agricultural/Irrigation (Crop, Golf, & Livestock) County‐wide "crop", "golf", and "livestock" A/I
A/I (LS) Agricultural/Irrigation (Residential Lakeside) Residential Lakeside Irrigation (Increase from Base) A/I
A/I‐F Agricultural/Irrigation ‐ New Future Future crop, livestock, and golf course A/I
Entity IDs are composed of four parts and then assigned to specific "Category":Part 1 ‐ State CodePart 2 ‐Water Supply CodePart 3 ‐ Subbasin CodePart 4 ‐ Unique ID NumberCategory ‐ Type of Entity
Example: "NWT‐14b" is the Tuckertown WTP. This entity's facility is a North Carolina (Part 1="N") Withdrawal (Part 2="W") in the Tuckertown Reservoir subbasin (Part 3="T") assigned a Unique ID Number of "14b" (Part 4="14b"). It has a Category of "Public Water/Wastewater Utilities"
H-142
CD-4.4 APPENDIX CD – 4.4
Yadkin Water Supply
Analysis – Modeling
Projections by YRWSP
Alternative
H-143
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 205.0 0.90
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 15.0 ‐0.62
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 69.4 0.01
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 26.3
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 147.2 1.45
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Baseline)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-144
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-145
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-146
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-147
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-148
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-149
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-150
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 15.8 16.6 50.3 51.4
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 15.5 16.3 49.9 51.1
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-151
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Baseline)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 220.3 232.6 314.8 328.7
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 78.3 77.7 144.2 140.9
H-152
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Baseline)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 19.24 ‐3.96 ‐4.60 ‐13.40 5.07 23.35 43.66 49.29 46.67 39.85 30.41 14.30 ‐0.95
2040 18.59 ‐6.32 ‐7.18 ‐16.64 3.43 23.18 44.74 50.68 47.67 40.78 30.76 13.70 ‐3.03
2050 18.30 ‐8.81 ‐9.98 ‐20.14 1.93 23.48 46.72 53.26 49.80 42.44 31.87 13.15 ‐5.50
2060 15.04 ‐14.42 ‐15.79 ‐26.74 ‐2.53 20.81 45.70 52.89 48.90 41.14 30.01 9.70 ‐10.79
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 84.70 19.29 20.33 19.42 55.29 100.22 166.46 196.59 172.32 122.45 77.26 43.21 22.27
2040 84.03 16.90 17.72 16.16 53.62 100.03 167.52 197.97 173.30 123.36 77.59 42.58 20.17
2050 150.53 86.73 84.15 75.22 112.84 161.62 239.29 274.31 249.12 192.57 141.95 104.16 82.90
2060 147.24 81.09 78.31 68.59 108.36 158.92 238.24 273.92 248.20 191.24 140.06 100.68 77.57
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-153
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Baseline)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 162.97 152.02 149.35 148.81 154.44 166.69 182.11 181.33 182.78 175.69 164.18 151.51 145.93
2040 175.42 163.84 160.90 160.38 166.33 179.48 195.79 194.80 196.32 189.01 176.68 163.36 157.34
2050 190.97 178.49 175.16 174.75 181.16 195.41 212.96 211.96 213.62 205.68 192.48 177.88 171.17
2060 204.95 191.56 187.91 187.60 194.51 209.77 228.50 227.48 229.25 220.73 206.63 190.84 183.60
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 232.64 179.85 178.73 186.07 209.05 247.86 308.94 332.81 312.87 262.55 214.93 184.19 173.04
2040 245.09 191.66 190.28 197.64 220.94 260.65 322.62 346.28 326.41 275.87 227.43 196.03 184.45
2050 327.46 278.66 273.79 274.60 296.51 337.90 409.62 437.22 417.43 360.11 306.51 272.70 263.50
2060 341.44 291.73 286.54 287.45 309.86 352.26 425.15 452.75 433.06 375.16 320.66 285.66 275.92
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-154
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Baseline)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-155
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Baseline)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 232.64 179.85 178.73 186.07 209.05 247.86 308.94 332.81 312.87 262.55 214.93 184.19 173.04
2040 245.09 191.66 190.28 197.64 220.94 260.65 322.62 346.28 326.41 275.87 227.43 196.03 184.45
2050 327.46 278.66 273.79 274.60 296.51 337.90 409.62 437.22 417.43 360.11 306.51 272.70 263.50
2060 341.44 291.73 286.54 287.45 309.86 352.26 425.15 452.75 433.06 375.16 320.66 285.66 275.92
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 84.70 19.29 20.33 19.42 55.29 100.22 166.46 196.59 172.32 122.45 77.26 43.21 22.27
2040 84.03 16.90 17.72 16.16 53.62 100.03 167.52 197.97 173.30 123.36 77.59 42.58 20.17
2050 150.53 86.73 84.15 75.22 112.84 161.62 239.29 274.31 249.12 192.57 141.95 104.16 82.90
2060 147.24 81.09 78.31 68.59 108.36 158.92 238.24 273.92 248.20 191.24 140.06 100.68 77.57
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-156
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 232.64 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 245.09 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 327.46 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 341.44 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 84.70 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 84.03 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 150.53 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 147.24 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-157
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 53.47 56.47 96.37 102.19
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 232.64 245.09 327.46 341.44
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 ‐5.64 ‐11.55 17.40 11.66
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 84.70 84.03 150.53 147.24
H-158
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 19.24 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 11.65 ‐26.51 ‐0.66
2040 18.59 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 12.48 ‐32.43 ‐0.68
2050 18.30 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 13.96 ‐35.64 ‐0.69
2060 15.04 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 15.10 ‐41.38 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 84.70 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 84.03 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 150.53 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 147.24 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Year
H-159
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 162.97 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 11.96 32.17 5.12
2040 175.42 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 12.80 35.17 5.25
2050 190.97 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 14.29 42.92 5.38
2060 204.95 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 15.44 48.73 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 232.64 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 245.09 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 327.46 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 341.44 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
Year
H-160
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Baseline)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-161
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 1)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-162
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-163
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-164
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-165
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-166
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-167
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-168
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.2
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-169
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 1)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-170
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-171
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-172
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-173
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-174
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 22.83 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 28.37 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 66.73 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 70.24 102.19 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 22.52 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 28.05 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 66.39 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 69.89 11.66 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-175
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 22.83 28.37 66.73 70.24
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 53.47 56.47 96.37 102.19
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 22.52 28.05 66.39 69.89
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 ‐5.64 ‐11.55 17.40 11.66
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-176
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 18.71 ‐26.51 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 24.24 ‐32.43 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 30.43 ‐35.64 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 33.92 ‐41.38 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 22.52 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 28.05 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 66.39 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 69.89 11.66 6.30
Year
H-177
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 19.02 32.17 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 24.56 35.17 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 30.76 42.92 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 34.27 48.73 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 22.83 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 28.37 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 66.73 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 70.24 102.19 12.78
Year
H-178
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 1)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-179
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 2A)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-180
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-181
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-182
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-183
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-184
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-185
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-186
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.2
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-187
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2A)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-188
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-189
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-190
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-191
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-192
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 15.13 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 22.50 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 27.99 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 30.94 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 14.97 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 22.33 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 27.83 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 30.78 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-193
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 15.13 22.50 27.99 30.94
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 53.47 56.47 96.37 102.19
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 14.97 22.33 27.83 30.78
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 ‐5.64 ‐11.55 17.40 11.66
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-194
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 14.40 0.00 11.65 ‐26.51 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 21.76 0.00 12.48 ‐32.43 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 27.26 0.00 13.96 ‐35.64 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 6.56 30.21 0.00 15.10 ‐41.38 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 14.97 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 22.33 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 27.83 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 30.78 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Year
H-195
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 14.40 0.00 11.96 32.17 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 21.76 0.00 12.80 35.17 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 27.26 0.00 14.29 42.92 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 7.40 30.21 0.00 15.44 48.73 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 15.13 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 22.50 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 27.99 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 30.94 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
Year
H-196
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2A)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-197
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 2B)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-198
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-199
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-200
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-201
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-202
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-203
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-204
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.2
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-205
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 2B)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-206
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-207
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-208
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-209
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-210
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 13.73 8.08 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 19.87 10.73 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 24.73 11.52 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 27.22 12.12 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 13.03 7.91 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 19.07 10.57 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 23.91 11.36 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 26.38 11.96 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-211
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 13.73 19.87 24.73 27.22
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 53.47 56.47 96.37 102.19
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 13.03 19.07 23.91 26.38
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 ‐5.64 ‐11.55 17.40 11.66
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-212
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 12.04 7.34 0.00 11.65 ‐26.51 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 18.08 10.00 0.00 12.48 ‐32.43 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 22.91 10.79 0.00 13.96 ‐35.64 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 25.39 11.38 0.00 15.10 ‐41.38 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 13.03 7.91 0.52 15.46 ‐5.64 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 19.07 10.57 0.52 16.28 ‐11.55 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 23.91 11.36 0.52 49.92 17.40 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 26.38 11.96 0.52 51.07 11.66 6.30
Year
H-213
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 12.74 7.34 0.00 11.96 32.17 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 18.88 10.00 0.00 12.80 35.17 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 23.73 10.79 0.00 14.29 42.92 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 26.23 11.38 0.00 15.44 48.73 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 13.73 8.08 0.52 15.77 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 19.87 10.73 0.52 16.60 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 24.73 11.52 0.52 50.26 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 27.22 12.12 0.52 51.41 102.19 12.78
Year
H-214
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 2B)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-215
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 3)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-216
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-217
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-218
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-219
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-220
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-221
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-222
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 15.8 16.6 50.3 51.4
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 15.5 16.3 49.9 51.1
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 60.5 68.2 112.8 121.0
H-223
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 3)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 1.4 0.2 33.9 30.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-224
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-225
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-226
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-227
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-228
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.01 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.48 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-229
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 60.53 68.23 112.84 121.01
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 1.42 0.21 33.87 30.48
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-230
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 11.65 ‐19.46 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 12.48 ‐20.66 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 13.96 ‐19.17 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 15.10 ‐22.56 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.48 6.30
Year
H-231
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 11.96 39.23 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 12.80 46.94 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 14.29 59.39 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 15.44 67.56 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.01 12.78
Year
H-232
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 3)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-233
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 4)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-234
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-235
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-236
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-237
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-238
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-239
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-240
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.2
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-241
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 4)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-242
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-243
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-244
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-245
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-246
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.01 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.48 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-247
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 60.53 68.23 112.84 121.01
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 1.42 0.21 33.87 30.48
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-248
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 11.65 ‐19.46 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 12.48 ‐20.66 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 13.96 ‐19.17 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 15.10 ‐22.56 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.48 6.30
Year
H-249
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 11.96 39.23 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 12.80 46.94 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 14.29 59.39 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 15.44 67.56 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.01 12.78
Year
H-250
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 4)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-251
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 5)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-252
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-253
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-254
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-255
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-256
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-257
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-258
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.3
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-259
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 5)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-260
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.88 0.52 ‐1.21 ‐11.60 15.47 42.53 68.46 76.01 70.99 62.38 50.13 26.85 4.41
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.08 96.03 92.89 83.74 126.36 180.64 261.01 297.03 270.29 212.48 160.18 117.83 92.78
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-261
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.79 206.50 202.50 202.75 212.51 231.49 251.26 250.60 251.34 241.97 226.75 207.99 198.80
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.28 306.67 301.13 302.60 327.86 373.98 447.92 475.86 455.15 396.40 340.78 302.81 291.13
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-262
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-263
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.28 306.67 301.13 302.60 327.86 373.98 447.92 475.86 455.15 396.40 340.78 302.81 291.13
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.08 96.03 92.89 83.74 126.36 180.64 261.01 297.03 270.29 212.48 160.18 117.83 92.78
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-264
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.28 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.03 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.08 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.50 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-265
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 15.77 16.60 50.26 51.41
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 60.53 68.23 112.84 121.03
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.28
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 43.62 46.09 51.04 59.11 68.02 78.97 90.53
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.56 10.96 14.30 15.46 16.28 49.92 51.07
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 5.87 4.40 2.85 1.42 0.21 33.87 30.50
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.08
H-266
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 6.76 ‐12.19 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 8.16 ‐15.47 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 10.50 ‐18.03 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 11.65 ‐19.46 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 12.48 ‐20.66 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 13.96 ‐19.17 ‐0.69
2060 33.88 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 15.10 ‐22.54 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 9.56 5.87 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 10.96 4.40 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 14.30 2.85 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 15.46 1.42 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 16.28 0.21 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 49.92 33.87 6.32
2060 166.08 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 51.07 30.50 6.30
Year
H-267
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 11.96 39.23 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 12.80 46.94 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 14.29 59.39 5.38
2060 223.79 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 15.44 67.57 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 15.77 60.53 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 16.60 68.23 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 50.26 112.84 12.65
2060 360.28 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 51.41 121.03 12.78
Year
H-268
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 5)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.29 43.20 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.29 45.67 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.30 50.62 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.31 58.69 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.32 67.60 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.33 78.56 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.35 90.11 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.29 43.62 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 0.29 46.09 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 0.30 51.04 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 0.31 59.11 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 0.32 68.02 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 0.33 78.97 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 0.35 90.53 6.48
Year
H-269
Base Year 2060
Industrial
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 10.0 15.5 0.92
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 4.2 4.3 0.06
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 5.8 11.2 1.37
Public Water/ Wastewater
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 133.4 223.8 1.08
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 113.1 189.9 1.08
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 20.2 33.9 1.08
Agriculture/Irrigation
Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 43.2 43.2 0.00
Subtotal (Excluding Power)‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 69.2 88.3 0.51
Public Water Supply/Wastewater and Industrial 26.1 45.1
Power
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Returns 2010‐2012 Average 0.0 0.0 n/a
Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 4.4 77.8 6.15
Total Basin‐ Net Withdrawals 2010‐2012 Average 73.7 166.1 1.71
Yadkin River Water Supply Study
Net Withdrawal Projection and Comparison with Historical and Forecasted Populations
(Alternative 11)
Flow
Water User Category Base Year AGR
Page 1 of 18
H-270
Population Projections Years Start Year End Year AGR
United States 2010‐2030 308,745,538 369,662,000 0.90
2030‐2050 369,662,000 420,268,000 0.64
2040‐2050 389,934,000 420,268,000 0.75
2010‐2050 308,745,538 420,268,000 0.77
South Carolina1, 3 2010‐2035 4,625,364 5,722,720 0.86
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2035 75,667 74,220 ‐0.08
Chesterfield 2010‐2035 46,734 49,140 0.20
Marlboro 2010‐2035 28,933 25,080 ‐0.57
Virginia4 2010‐2040 8,001,024 10,530,228 0.69
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2040 64,065 64,609 0.02
Carroll 2010‐2040 30,042 31,187 0.09
Grayson 2010‐2040 15,533 14,520 ‐0.17
Patrick 2010‐2040 18,490 18,902 0.06
North Carolina2, 3 2010‐2030 9,535,483 11,576,088 0.97
Yadkin River Basin 2010‐2030 3,418,431 4,219,846 1.06
Alexander 2010‐2030 37,198 37,276 0.01
Alleghany 2010‐2030 11,155 11,137 ‐0.01
Anson 2010‐2030 26,948 26,425 ‐0.10
Ashe 2010‐2030 27,281 27,649 0.07
Cabarrus 2010‐2030 178,011 237,929 1.46
Caldwell 2010‐2030 83,029 81,667 ‐0.08
Davidson 2010‐2031 162,878 169,749 0.21
Davie 2010‐2030 41,240 43,626 0.28
Forsyth 2010‐2030 350,670 393,805 0.58
Guilford 2010‐2030 488,406 601,279 1.04
Iredell 2010‐2030 159,437 199,982 1.14
Mecklenburg 2010‐2030 919,628 1,360,364 1.98
Montgomery 2010‐2030 27,798 27,489 ‐0.06
Randolph 2010‐2030 141,752 143,669 0.07
Richmond 2010‐2030 46,639 45,593 ‐0.11
Rowan 2010‐2030 138,428 146,442 0.28
Scotland 2010‐2030 36,157 33,904 ‐0.32
Stanly 2010‐2030 60,585 64,565 0.32
Stokes 2010‐2030 47,401 43,614 ‐0.42
Surry 2010‐2030 73,673 73,367 ‐0.02
Union 2010‐2030 201,292 285,500 1.76
Watauga 2010‐2030 51,079 57,214 0.57
Wilkes 2010‐2030 69,340 70,511 0.08
Yadkin 2010‐2030 38,406 37,090 ‐0.17
Page 2 of 18
H-271
Historical Data Years Start Year End Year AGR
US Population History3 1970‐2010 203,302,031 308,745,538 1.05
South Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 2,590,516 4,625,364 1.46
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 60,818 75,667 0.55
Chesterfield 1970‐2010 33,667 46,734 0.82
Marlboro 1970‐2010 27,151 28,933 0.16
Virginia Historical Population4 1970‐2010 4,648,494 8,001,024 1.37
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 53,813 64,065 0.44
Carroll 1970‐2010 23,092 30,042 0.66
Grayson 1970‐2010 15,439 15,533 0.02
Patrick 1970‐2010 15,282 18,490 0.48
North Carolina Historical Population3 1970‐2010 5,082,059 9,535,483 1.59
Yadkin River Basin 1970‐2010 1,768,998 3,418,431 1.66
Alexander 1970‐2010 19,466 37,198 1.63
Alleghany 1970‐2010 8,134 11,155 0.79
Anson 1970‐2010 23,488 26,948 0.34
Ashe 1970‐2010 19,571 27,281 0.83
Cabarrus 1970‐2010 74,629 178,011 2.20
Caldwell 1970‐2010 56,699 83,029 0.96
Davidson 1970‐2010 95,627 162,878 1.34
Davie 1970‐2010 18,855 41,240 1.98
Forsyth 1970‐2010 214,348 350,670 1.24
Guilford 1970‐2010 288,590 488,406 1.32
Iredell 1970‐2010 72,197 159,437 2.00
Mecklenburg 1970‐2010 354,656 919,628 2.41
Montgomery 1970‐2010 19,267 27,798 0.92
Randolph 1970‐2010 76,358 141,752 1.56
Richmond 1970‐2010 39,889 46,639 0.39
Rowan 1970‐2010 90,035 138,428 1.08
Scotland 1970‐2011 26,929 36,157 0.74
Stanly 1970‐2012 42,822 60,585 0.87
Stokes 1970‐2013 23,782 47,401 1.74
Surry 1970‐2014 51,415 73,673 0.90
Union 1970‐2015 54,714 201,292 3.31
Watauga 1970‐2016 23,404 51,079 1.97
Wilkes 1970‐2017 49,524 69,340 0.84
Yadkin 1970‐2010 24,599 38,406 1.12
Sources
4. Virginia data retrieved online on June 26, 2014 (http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/profile/VA)
3. U.S. Census Bereau
2. North Carolina State Office of Budget and Management
1. South Carolina Office of Research and Statistics Health & Demographics webpage
Page 3 of 18
H-272
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsWWAI‐1 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill IND In‐take Pump ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWW‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐W. Kerr Scott Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐89 Wilkes County‐‐‐‐Wilkes County WTP (Future) PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 10.3
ReturnsNRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp‐‐‐‐Patterson Mill (return) IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.0
H-273
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
HIGH ROCK LAKE
WithdrawalsHWAI‐2 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐Lousiana Pacific Corporation IND Yadkin River ND ND 1.4 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Second Creek ND ND ND 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐True Elkin, Inc. IND Big Elkin Creek ND ND 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWH‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐High Rock Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWH‐18a City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Yadkin River 1.6 1.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9
NWH‐19c City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) PW/WUAbbotts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.5
NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐F. G. Doggett WTP PW/WU Stewarts Creek 3.9 2.6 2.2 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐S. L. Spencer WTP PW/WU Lovills Creek 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NWH‐22a City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury WTP PW/WU Yadkin/South Yadkin 8.0 6.2 7.7 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.7 9.0 9.7 10.4 11.2 12.1NWH‐23a City of Statesville‐‐‐‐City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) PW/WU South Yadkin River 5.2 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.8
NWH‐24a City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐City of Thomasville WTP PW/WUAbbots Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Thom‐A‐Lex)3.2 2.6 3.0 ND 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0
NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Swann RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr Scott)13.1 13.6 12.1 11.4 11.0 11.2 11.3 11.1 11.2 11.9 13.0 14.6 15.3 16.1 17.2
NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WUYadkin River @ Idols RWPS
(Reservoir: W. Kerr‐Scott)31.5 32.7 29.0 27.4 26.4 26.8 27.1 26.7 26.9 28.5 31.3 35.1 36.6 38.7 41.3
NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐C. O. Pickle WP PW/WU Yadkin River 9.2 10.1 11.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 10.2 9.9 10.5 10.6 10.7 11.0 11.2 11.5 11.8NWH‐28a Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WTP PW/WU S. Yadkin 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3NWH‐28b Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Yadkin 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8NWH‐63 Town of Elkin‐‐‐‐Elkin Municipal WTP PW/WU Elkin Creek (Reservoir: Elkin) 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville‐‐‐‐Jonesville WP PW/WU Yadkin River 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Hugh A. Lagle WTP PW/WU Hunting Creek 0.8 0.8 0.9 ND ND 0.9 0.8 ND 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐North Wilkesboro WP PW/WU Reddies River 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Toms Creek 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Wilkesboro WFP PW/WU Yadkin River 3.8 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WTP PW/WUSouth Deep Creek (Reservoir:
Town of Yadkinville)1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
NWH‐87 Energy United Water‐‐‐‐Energy United Water WTP PW/WU South Yadkin River 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Steam Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Buck Combined Cycle Station TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND 0.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 TEPYadkin River/High Rock Lake
(upstream tributary)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 TEP Yadkin River/High Rock Lake 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 120.1 118.1 119.3 109.5 107.4 111.8 110.5 109.4 110.4 116.2 118.7 126.0 130.3 137.8 143.8
ReturnsNRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc‐‐‐‐ATI Allvac Monroe Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation‐‐‐‐LP Roaring River WWTP IND Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
NRH‐45P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc‐‐‐‐PPG Industries Fiber Glass
ProductsIND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc‐‐‐‐Salisbury Facility IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc‐‐‐‐304 East Main Street Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc‐‐‐‐Harmony Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn‐‐‐‐Dobson Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company‐‐‐‐Linwood Yard IND Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐16 City of High Point‐‐‐‐Westside WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.5 4.1 2.8 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3NRH‐18b City of King‐‐‐‐City of King WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐19a City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7NRH‐19b City of Lexington‐‐‐‐Lexington WTP #1 & 2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy‐‐‐‐Mount Airy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 5.0 3.2 2.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2NRH‐22b City of Salisbury‐‐‐‐Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 4.5 6.8 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.1 6.3 7.0 7.2 7.5 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.1NRH‐23b City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Fourth Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.6 3.1 4.0 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.6NRH‐23c City of Statesville‐‐‐‐Third Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 2.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.4NRH‐24b City of Thomasville‐‐‐‐Hamby Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐07 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.7NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Archie Elledge WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 21.1 18.4 18.0 17.0 17.6 17.6 15.7 14.8 16.0 17.4 19.0 21.4 22.3 23.6 25.1NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐Muddy Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 13.1 14.6 15.5 14.4 14.9 15.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 15.5 17.0 19.0 19.9 21.0 22.4NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐P. W. Swann WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem‐‐‐‐R. A. Thomas WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 ND ND 1.5 0.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc‐‐‐‐Davidson Water WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐04 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4NRH‐28c Davie County‐‐‐‐Sparks Road WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NRH‐28d Davie County‐‐‐‐Cooleemee WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run‐‐‐‐Bermuda Run WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐60 Town of Boonville‐‐‐‐Boonville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRH‐62 Town of Dobson‐‐‐‐Dobson WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Bear Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville‐‐‐‐Dutchman Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐05 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Thurman Street WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
H-274
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain‐‐‐‐Pilot Mountain WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐03 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro‐‐‐‐Cub Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐01 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.7 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville‐‐‐‐Yadkinville WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
NRH‐81Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc‐‐‐‐Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority
WWTPPW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐02 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7
NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland‐‐‐‐Cleveland WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐06 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Return Subtotal 73.8 70.1 68.8 64.7 66.9 69.1 67.1 62.4 66.7 69.5 74.9 81.4 85.4 90.1 95.6
HIGH ROCK LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 46.3 47.9 50.6 44.8 40.6 42.7 43.4 47.0 43.7 46.7 43.8 44.6 44.9 47.7 48.1
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsTWAI‐3 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NWT‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Tuckertown Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWT‐14b City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown)3.0 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.4 ND 2.4 2.4 3.9 4.2 4.4 5.8 5.9 6.0
NWT‐61a Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir:
Tuckertown Reservoir)0.9 1.4 1.4 ND 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.4 5.2 4.3 3.1 4.0 4.2 1.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 6.5 6.7 8.1 8.3 8.4
ReturnsNRT‐14c City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Tuckertown WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4NRT‐61b Town of Denton‐‐‐‐Denton WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 4.0 4.8 3.9 2.7 3.5 3.6 1.2 3.6 3.6 5.0 5.8 6.0 7.3 7.4 7.6
H-275
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE)
WithdrawalsNWAI‐4 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) A/I (CGL) n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NWN‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NWN‐14d City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐US 52 HWY WTP PW/WUYadkin River at Narrows
(Reservoir: Narrows (Badin Lake))3.8 4.2 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.1 ND 3.0 3.0 5.4 6.7 7.3 10.0 10.8 11.4
Withdrawal Subtotal 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.5 3.0 3.3 0.2 3.2 3.3 5.7 7.5 8.1 10.7 11.5 12.1
ReturnsNRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America‐‐‐‐Badin Works IND Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.3 2.7 3.1 0.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 7.3 7.9 10.6 11.4 12.0
FALLS RESERVOIR
WithdrawalsFWAI‐5 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir A/I (CGL) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NWF‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Falls Reservoir IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Withdrawal Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Returns
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
None None None ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Return Subtotal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FALLS RESERVOIR TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
H-276
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
LAKE TILLERY
WithdrawalsLWAI‐6 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery A/I (CGL) n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8NWL‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Lake Tillery IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐76eUnion County Public Works‐‐‐‐Planned Yadkin River Water Intake
(Future)PW/WU n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 11.8 16.5 18.8
NWL‐05b Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) PW/WU Back Creek (Reservoir: Lake Lucas) 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 4.1 4.5
NWL‐05c Asheboro‐‐‐‐W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) PW/WU Uwharrie (Reservoir: Lake Reese) 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.7 5.1 5.8 6.3 7.2 7.9
NWL‐42 Montgomery County‐‐‐‐Montgomery County WTP PW/WULAKE TILLERY (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5
NWL‐69a Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WTP PW/WUYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #2 TEPYadkin River (Reservoir: Lake
Tillery)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 10.6 11.4 11.9 12.0 10.5 10.0 9.7 9.8 9.9 11.3 14.6 22.8 28.4 66.7 70.2
ReturnsNRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District‐‐‐‐Badin WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐08 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
LAKE TILLERY TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS 10.1 10.9 11.7 11.7 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.5 9.6 11.0 14.3 22.5 28.0 66.4 69.9
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
WithdrawalsBWAI‐7 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake A/I (CGL) n/a 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5
NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) IND Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond ND ND ND 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) IND Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond ND ND ND 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac‐‐‐‐Monroe Plant IND Lower Pond ND ND ND ND 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC‐‐‐‐The Fork, LLC IND Rocky River ND ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NWB‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Blewett Falls Lake IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NWB‐03a Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)5.5 6.0 6.0 5.4 5.7 6.6 6.8 5.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2
NWB‐03bAnson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (treated wholesale to
UCPW)PW/WU
Pee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐03c Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant (raw wholesale to UCPW) PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NWB‐15a City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WUCoddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake Don
T. Howell)6.8 7.8 9.6 ND 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.3 8.3 8.5 9.1 12.2 14.1
NWB‐15d City of Concord‐‐‐‐Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) PW/WUCold Water Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Fisher)2.1 2.4 2.9 ND 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.8 4.3
NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WUIrish Buffalo Creek (Reservoir:
Kannapolis Lake)6.5 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.2 3.7 3.7 4.0 5.4 6.2
NWB‐17cCity of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake
Howell)PW/WU
Coddle Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Howell)0.7 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
NWB‐20a City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WUStewarts Creek (Reservoir: Lake
Twitty)7.0 6.9 6.2 ND 5.7 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.7 13.9
NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Mt. Pleasant WTF PW/WU Dutch Buffalo Creek 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
NWB‐88 Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WUPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)3.7 3.2 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.0 3.7 ND 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8
NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Smith Energy Complex TEP n/a 0.0 ND 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC‐‐‐‐Additional Nuclear Plant #1 TEPPee Dee River (Reservoir: Blewett
Falls Lake)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.2 32.2
Withdrawal Subtotal 44.0 44.1 50.2 28.1 48.7 46.5 50.5 44.7 49.5 50.5 53.9 53.5 56.5 96.4 102.2
H-277
Catawba‐Wateree Basin Water Use Projections: Withdrawals, Returns, and Net Withdrawals (Alternative 11)
Proj ID Entity Entity Type Source Water Historical Water Use (MGD) Projected Water Use (MGD)
1997 2002 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
ReturnsNRB‐35a Hedrick Industries‐‐‐‐Aquadale Quarry IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 1.2 ND 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company‐‐‐‐Carolina Stalite Company IND Subbasin 03‐07‐13 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department‐‐‐‐Mallard Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 5.1 5.5 7.8 7.5 8.2 7.9 8.4 7.9 8.1 8.6 9.6 11.4 13.6 16.3 19.4NRB‐14a City of Albemarle‐‐‐‐Long Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐13 8.1 9.1 7.4 5.5 6.1 5.7 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.4NRB‐15b City of Concord‐‐‐‐Coddle Creek WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis‐‐‐‐City of Kannapolis WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4NRB‐20b City of Monroe‐‐‐‐John Glenn WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7NRB‐20c City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 7.1 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.4 7.0 8.3 9.9 11.8 14.0NRB‐20d City of Monroe‐‐‐‐Monroe WWTP (allotment to Union County) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.4 4.7 6.6 7.6NRB‐52 Stanly County‐‐‐‐West Stanly WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe‐‐‐‐Biscoe WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 3.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.2 4.6 5.2 5.8NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead‐‐‐‐Mount Gilead WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐69b Town of Norwood‐‐‐‐Norwood WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐14 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2NRB‐71 Town of Troy‐‐‐‐Troy WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐15 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5NRB‐76a Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NRB‐76a(F) Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Crooked Creek WWTP #2 (Future) PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5NRB‐76b Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Hunley Creek WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NRB‐76c Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Grassy Branch WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1NRB‐76d Union County Public Works‐‐‐‐Tallwood Estates WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
NRB‐77cWater and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County‐‐‐‐Rocky River WWTP
(WSACC)PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐12 17.1 14.6 14.7 14.3 14.7 14.4 14.2 13.9 14.2 14.9 16.1 18.4 21.1 24.1 27.7
NRB‐84 City of Charlotte‐‐‐‐Cabarrus Woods WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc‐‐‐‐Country Wood WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company‐‐‐‐Bradfield Farms WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐11 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7
NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina‐‐‐‐Hemby Acres WWTP PW/WU (D) Subbasin 03‐07‐12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Return Subtotal 47.9 44.5 45.3 42.4 44.0 43.2 42.4 41.6 43.6 46.1 51.0 59.1 68.0 79.0 90.5
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐3.9 ‐0.4 4.9 ‐14.3 4.7 3.3 8.1 3.1 5.9 4.4 2.8 ‐5.6 ‐11.6 17.4 11.7
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WithdrawalsDWAI‐8 Agriculture/Irrigation‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) A/I (CGL) n/a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0NWD‐00 New Future Industry‐‐‐‐Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake (NC) IND‐F n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) IND Pump House ‐ 1 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) IND Pump House ‐ 3 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co.‐‐‐‐Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) IND Pump House ‐ 4 ND ND ND 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 0.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
NWD‐91a City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WTP PW/WUHamlet Water System (Reservoir:
Hamlet Water Lake)1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
NWD‐90b City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) PW/WU City Pond (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
NWD‐90c City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) PW/WURoberdel Lake (Reservoir:
Roberdel Lake)2.1 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2
NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro‐‐‐‐Town of Wadesboro WTP PW/WU Jones Creek (Reservoir: City Pond) 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9
Withdrawal Subtotal 8.0 6.8 7.2 11.7 12.8 12.7 12.4 8.4 11.2 11.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.8
ReturnsNRD‐03d Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Regional WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5NRD‐03e Anson County‐‐‐‐Anson County Filtration Plant PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC‐‐‐‐Richmond Plant IND Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3NRD‐91b City of Hamlet‐‐‐‐Hamlet WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8NRD‐90a City of Rockingham‐‐‐‐Rockingham WWTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 4.8 4.3 3.8 4.1 3.1 2.7 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1NRD‐88b Richmond County‐‐‐‐Richmond County WTP PW/WU Subbasin 03‐07‐16 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Return Subtotal 9.1 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.3 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.3 6.5
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) TOTAL NET WITHDRAWALS ‐1.1 ‐0.7 0.2 4.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 2.4 5.4 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.3
GRAND TOTAL (ALL BASINS)WITHDRAWALS 185.6 185.7 191.7 158.8 176.3 178.5 175.3 174.0 179.8 192.0 211.2 227.3 244.3 331.3 347.5
RETURNS 123.2 115.9 115.0 108.3 112.1 113.6 110.7 105.1 111.5 116.9 127.3 141.9 154.9 170.6 187.7
NET WITHDRAWALS 62.4 69.8 76.6 50.6 64.2 65.0 64.6 68.9 68.3 75.1 83.9 85.4 89.5 160.7 159.8
H-278
Projected Net Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 1.50 0.93 ‐6.20 8.74 23.81 40.24 44.94 42.76 36.83 29.16 15.69 3.40
2015 22.96 3.20 2.52 ‐4.90 10.87 26.82 44.06 48.79 46.53 40.51 32.28 18.35 5.44
2020 24.82 3.30 2.58 ‐5.40 11.67 28.91 47.70 52.82 50.43 43.92 35.03 19.92 5.80
2030 26.30 1.64 0.86 ‐7.73 11.82 31.49 52.19 57.95 54.94 47.81 37.95 20.73 4.75
2040 30.35 3.01 1.93 ‐7.18 14.67 36.75 58.96 65.12 61.47 54.04 43.33 24.40 6.47
2050 34.77 4.25 2.77 ‐6.90 17.66 42.48 66.62 73.46 69.11 61.00 49.46 28.14 7.80
2060 33.86 0.51 ‐1.22 ‐11.61 15.45 42.51 68.44 75.99 70.97 62.36 50.12 26.84 4.40
Industrial
Base 5.84 5.41 5.49 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.60 5.70 5.53 5.78 7.25 7.15 5.68
2015 5.83 5.40 5.48 5.41 5.49 5.45 5.59 5.69 5.53 5.77 7.25 7.14 5.67
2020 11.32 10.89 10.97 10.90 10.98 10.94 11.09 11.18 11.02 11.26 12.74 12.63 11.16
2030 11.30 10.87 10.95 10.88 10.96 10.92 11.07 11.16 11.00 11.24 12.71 12.61 11.14
2040 11.28 10.84 10.92 10.86 10.94 10.90 11.04 11.14 10.98 11.22 12.69 12.59 11.12
2050 11.25 10.81 10.90 10.83 10.92 10.87 11.02 11.12 10.96 11.19 12.66 12.56 11.09
2060 11.23 10.78 10.86 10.80 10.89 10.84 10.99 11.09 10.93 11.17 12.63 12.53 11.06
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-279
Projected Withdrawals by Month (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 124.27 122.00 121.49 126.39 136.71 149.28 148.91 149.80 143.65 134.49 123.73 119.08
2015 141.48 131.77 129.41 128.89 134.09 145.09 158.30 157.72 158.68 152.48 142.59 131.49 126.56
2020 153.79 143.25 140.70 140.21 145.75 157.61 171.97 171.30 172.48 165.80 155.07 143.03 137.57
2030 170.03 157.62 154.82 154.49 161.19 174.83 190.63 189.99 191.05 183.65 171.72 157.94 151.63
2040 187.19 173.17 170.01 169.83 177.57 193.04 210.00 209.23 210.11 202.27 189.24 174.07 166.84
2050 207.44 191.56 187.91 187.99 196.90 214.40 232.86 232.17 232.93 224.25 210.07 192.87 184.47
2060 223.77 206.49 202.49 202.74 212.49 231.47 251.24 250.58 251.32 241.95 226.73 207.97 198.79
Industrial
Base 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2015 10.01 9.94 9.90 9.82 9.85 9.72 9.60 9.83 9.95 10.00 11.11 10.87 9.53
2020 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2030 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2040 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2050 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
2060 15.51 15.44 15.40 15.32 15.35 15.22 15.10 15.33 15.45 15.50 16.61 16.37 15.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2015 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2020 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2030 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2040 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2050 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
2060 43.18 1.85 2.98 10.98 28.23 54.85 100.23 124.41 102.87 59.90 23.34 6.22 2.30
Power
Base 4.44 3.75 4.93 4.72 4.05 4.27 4.82 6.31 5.59 4.27 2.82 3.47 4.24
2015 8.49 8.27 8.50 8.48 8.51 8.55 8.75 8.87 8.89 8.73 8.40 8.04 7.89
2020 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2030 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2040 10.98 10.54 11.00 10.96 11.02 11.10 11.50 11.74 11.78 11.46 10.80 10.08 9.78
2050 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
2060 77.80 82.88 80.25 73.55 71.76 72.42 81.32 85.52 85.50 79.04 74.08 72.23 75.00
Total
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-280
Projected Returns by Month (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 122.77 121.07 127.69 117.65 112.90 109.04 103.97 107.03 106.82 105.33 108.04 115.68
2015 118.52 128.57 126.90 133.78 123.22 118.27 114.24 108.93 112.15 111.97 110.31 113.14 121.12
2020 128.98 139.95 138.13 145.61 134.07 128.69 124.27 118.49 122.05 121.88 120.03 123.12 131.77
2030 143.73 155.98 153.95 162.21 149.37 143.34 138.45 132.05 136.11 135.84 133.78 137.21 146.88
2040 156.83 170.16 168.09 177.01 162.90 156.29 151.05 144.12 148.64 148.23 145.91 149.66 160.37
2050 172.67 187.30 185.14 194.89 179.24 171.93 166.24 158.70 163.82 163.24 160.61 164.73 176.67
2060 189.91 205.98 203.71 214.34 197.04 188.96 182.80 174.59 180.34 179.59 176.62 181.14 194.39
Industrial
Base 4.17 4.53 4.41 4.40 4.36 4.27 4.00 4.14 4.41 4.22 3.86 3.73 3.85
2015 4.18 4.54 4.41 4.41 4.37 4.27 4.01 4.14 4.42 4.22 3.87 3.73 3.85
2020 4.19 4.55 4.42 4.42 4.38 4.28 4.02 4.15 4.43 4.23 3.88 3.74 3.86
2030 4.21 4.57 4.45 4.44 4.40 4.30 4.04 4.17 4.45 4.25 3.90 3.76 3.88
2040 4.23 4.60 4.47 4.46 4.42 4.32 4.06 4.19 4.47 4.28 3.92 3.79 3.91
2050 4.26 4.63 4.50 4.48 4.44 4.35 4.08 4.21 4.49 4.30 3.95 3.82 3.93
2060 4.28 4.66 4.53 4.51 4.46 4.38 4.11 4.24 4.51 4.33 3.98 3.85 3.96
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-281
Projected Flow by Month (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 139.80 139.80 147.01 168.53 205.55 263.93 289.46 268.21 217.82 171.76 144.30 135.14
2015 203.16 151.82 150.79 158.17 180.69 218.21 276.89 300.83 280.38 231.11 185.45 156.63 146.28
2020 223.46 171.07 170.08 177.47 200.35 238.78 298.80 322.78 302.58 252.66 205.82 175.71 164.68
2030 239.70 185.45 184.19 191.75 215.79 256.00 317.47 341.47 321.15 270.50 222.47 190.62 178.74
2040 256.86 200.99 199.39 207.09 232.18 274.22 336.83 360.71 340.20 289.13 239.99 206.74 193.94
2050 343.93 291.72 286.54 287.84 312.25 356.89 429.52 457.43 436.74 378.68 324.10 287.69 276.79
2060 360.26 306.66 301.12 302.58 327.84 373.96 447.90 475.84 455.13 396.38 340.76 302.80 291.12
RETURNS
Base 117.31 127.30 125.48 132.09 122.02 117.16 113.04 108.11 111.45 111.04 109.19 111.77 119.53
2015 122.70 133.10 131.31 138.19 127.59 122.54 118.25 113.07 116.57 116.19 114.18 116.88 124.98
2020 133.16 144.50 142.55 150.02 138.45 132.97 128.28 122.64 126.48 126.11 123.91 126.86 135.63
2030 147.94 160.55 158.40 166.65 153.76 147.64 142.48 136.21 140.56 140.09 137.68 140.98 150.77
2040 161.06 174.75 172.56 181.47 167.31 160.62 155.10 148.31 153.11 152.51 149.84 153.45 164.28
2050 176.93 191.93 189.64 199.37 183.67 176.28 170.33 162.92 168.31 167.55 164.56 168.55 180.60
2060 194.20 210.64 208.24 218.86 201.50 193.34 186.91 178.83 184.86 183.92 180.60 184.98 198.35
NET WITHDRAWAL
Base 73.68 12.50 14.32 14.92 46.51 88.39 150.89 181.35 156.76 106.79 62.57 32.53 15.62
2015 80.46 18.72 19.48 19.98 53.10 95.68 158.64 187.76 163.82 114.92 71.27 39.75 21.30
2020 90.30 26.58 27.53 27.44 61.90 105.81 170.52 200.15 176.10 126.55 81.91 48.85 29.05
2030 91.76 24.89 25.79 25.10 62.03 108.36 174.99 205.25 180.59 130.41 84.80 49.64 27.97
2040 95.79 26.24 26.83 25.62 64.86 113.60 181.73 212.40 187.09 136.62 90.16 53.29 29.67
2050 167.00 99.80 96.90 88.46 128.57 180.62 259.19 294.51 268.43 211.13 159.54 119.15 96.19
2060 166.06 96.02 92.88 83.73 126.34 180.62 260.99 297.01 270.27 212.46 160.16 117.82 92.76
Year
Annual
Average
Month
H-282
Projected Flow by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasins
Year Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM OF
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC)
WITHDRAWALS
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 22.83 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 28.37 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 66.73 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 70.24 102.19 12.78
RETURNS
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 1.49 42.42 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 1.79 44.59 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 2.41 48.93 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 3.74 55.67 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 5.06 63.28 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 6.89 72.42 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 7.97 82.91 6.48
NET WITHDRAWALS
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 8.36 7.07 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 9.46 5.91 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 12.19 4.96 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 19.08 ‐2.21 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 23.31 ‐6.81 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 59.84 23.95 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 62.27 19.28 6.30
Draft Projections 14 of 18 12/11/2014
H-283
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.71 2.71 9.53 9.71 9.88 10.07 10.25
HIGH ROCK LAKE 110.39 116.16 118.73 126.05 130.26 137.82 143.77
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 4.12 5.65 6.47 6.67 8.11 8.26 8.40
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.26 5.68 7.46 8.08 10.73 11.52 12.12
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 9.85 11.26 14.60 22.83 28.37 66.73 70.24
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 49.49 50.49 53.88 53.47 56.47 96.37 102.19
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 11.16 11.20 12.26 12.39 12.52 12.65 12.78
Total 191.00 203.16 223.46 239.70 256.86 343.93 360.26
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
HIGH ROCK LAKE 66.70 69.47 74.88 81.42 85.37 90.10 95.63
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 0.55 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.82 0.84
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAKE TILLERY 1.49 1.79 2.41 3.74 5.06 6.89 7.97
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 42.42 44.59 48.93 55.67 63.28 72.42 82.91
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.78 5.82 5.89 6.03 6.18 6.33 6.48
Total 117.31 122.70 133.16 147.94 161.06 176.93 194.20
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
W. KERR SCOTT RESERVOIR 2.49 2.49 9.32 9.49 9.67 9.85 10.04
HIGH ROCK LAKE 43.69 46.70 43.85 44.63 44.89 47.73 48.14
TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR 3.56 4.99 5.79 5.97 7.31 7.44 7.56
NARROWS RESERVOIR (BADIN LAKE) 3.10 5.51 7.30 7.91 10.57 11.36 11.96
FALLS RESERVOIR 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
LAKE TILLERY 8.36 9.46 12.19 19.08 23.31 59.84 62.27
BLEWETT FALLS LAKE 7.07 5.91 4.96 ‐2.21 ‐6.81 23.95 19.28
DOWNSTREAM OF BLEWETT FALLS LAKE (NC) 5.38 5.38 6.37 6.36 6.34 6.32 6.30
Total 73.68 80.46 90.30 91.76 95.79 167.00 166.06
H-284
Projected Net Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 20.23 0.00 20.19 3.07 3.03 0.00 5.55 ‐10.98 ‐0.63
2015 22.96 0.00 20.96 4.50 5.44 0.00 6.66 ‐13.97 ‐0.63
2020 24.82 6.83 14.63 4.80 6.73 0.00 8.39 ‐15.92 ‐0.64
2030 26.30 7.00 15.44 4.98 7.34 0.00 15.28 ‐23.08 ‐0.66
2040 30.35 7.18 15.72 6.31 10.00 0.00 19.50 ‐27.69 ‐0.68
2050 34.77 7.36 16.09 6.44 10.79 0.00 23.87 ‐29.09 ‐0.69
2060 33.86 7.55 16.53 6.56 11.38 0.00 26.30 ‐33.76 ‐0.71
Industrial
Base 5.84 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2015 5.83 ‐0.02 ‐0.36 0.00 ‐0.16 0.00 0.00 2.35 4.03
2020 11.32 ‐0.02 0.63 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2030 11.30 ‐0.02 0.61 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2040 11.28 ‐0.02 0.58 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2050 11.25 ‐0.02 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
2060 11.23 ‐0.02 0.53 0.50 0.34 0.50 1.00 3.35 5.03
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 73.68 2.49 43.69 3.56 3.10 0.02 8.36 7.07 5.38
2015 80.46 2.49 46.70 4.99 5.51 0.02 9.46 5.91 5.38
2020 90.30 9.32 43.85 5.79 7.30 0.52 12.19 4.96 6.37
2030 91.76 9.49 44.63 5.97 7.91 0.52 19.08 ‐2.21 6.36
2040 95.79 9.67 44.89 7.31 10.57 0.52 23.31 ‐6.81 6.34
2050 167.00 9.85 47.73 7.44 11.36 0.52 59.84 23.95 6.32
2060 166.06 10.04 48.14 7.56 11.96 0.52 62.27 19.28 6.30
Year
H-285
Projected Withdrawals by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 133.37 0.00 83.77 3.62 3.03 0.00 7.05 31.01 4.89
2015 141.48 0.00 87.30 5.15 5.44 0.00 8.45 30.20 4.93
2020 153.79 6.83 86.38 5.48 6.73 0.00 10.79 32.59 4.99
2030 170.03 7.00 93.69 5.68 7.34 0.00 19.02 32.17 5.12
2040 187.19 7.18 97.91 7.12 10.00 0.00 24.56 35.17 5.25
2050 207.44 7.36 102.98 7.26 10.79 0.00 30.76 42.92 5.38
2060 223.77 7.55 108.92 7.40 11.38 0.00 34.27 48.73 5.52
Industrial
Base 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2015 10.01 0.19 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.77 4.28
2020 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2030 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2040 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2050 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
2060 15.51 0.19 3.77 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.77 5.28
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2015 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2020 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2030 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2040 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2050 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
2060 43.18 2.51 23.60 0.49 0.23 0.02 2.80 11.52 1.99
Power
Base 4.44 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.00
2015 8.49 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2020 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2030 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2040 10.98 0.00 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00
2050 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
2060 77.80 0.00 7.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.16 38.16 0.00
Total
Base 191.00 2.71 110.39 4.12 3.26 0.02 9.85 49.49 11.16
2015 203.16 2.71 116.16 5.65 5.68 0.02 11.26 50.49 11.20
2020 223.46 9.53 118.73 6.47 7.46 0.52 14.60 53.88 12.26
2030 239.70 9.71 126.05 6.67 8.08 0.52 22.83 53.47 12.39
2040 256.86 9.88 130.26 8.11 10.73 0.52 28.37 56.47 12.52
2050 343.93 10.07 137.82 8.26 11.52 0.52 66.73 96.37 12.65
2060 360.26 10.25 143.77 8.40 12.12 0.52 70.24 102.19 12.78
Year
H-286
Projected Returns by Subbasin (mgd) (Alternative 11)
Subbasin
Total
W. KERR SCOTT
RESERVOIR HIGH ROCK LAKE
TUCKERTOWN
RESERVOIR
NARROWS
RESERVOIR
(BADIN LAKE)
FALLS
RESERVOIR LAKE TILLERY
BLEWETT FALLS
LAKE
DOWNSTREAM
OF BLEWETT
FALLS LAKE (NC)
Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Base 113.14 0.00 63.58 0.55 0.00 0.00 1.49 42.00 5.52
2015 118.52 0.00 66.34 0.65 0.00 0.00 1.79 44.17 5.57
2020 128.98 0.00 71.74 0.68 0.00 0.00 2.41 48.51 5.64
2030 143.73 0.00 78.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 3.74 55.26 5.78
2040 156.83 0.00 82.19 0.80 0.00 0.00 5.06 62.86 5.92
2050 172.67 0.00 86.89 0.82 0.00 0.00 6.89 72.00 6.07
2060 189.91 0.00 92.39 0.84 0.00 0.00 7.97 82.49 6.23
Industrial
Base 4.17 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2015 4.18 0.21 3.13 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2020 4.19 0.21 3.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2030 4.21 0.21 3.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2040 4.23 0.21 3.18 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2050 4.26 0.21 3.21 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
2060 4.28 0.21 3.24 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25
Agriculture/Irrigation
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Power
Base 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2030 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total
Base 117.31 0.21 66.70 0.55 0.16 0.00 1.49 42.42 5.78
2015 122.70 0.21 69.47 0.65 0.16 0.00 1.79 44.59 5.82
2020 133.16 0.21 74.88 0.68 0.16 0.00 2.41 48.93 5.89
2030 147.94 0.21 81.42 0.70 0.16 0.00 3.74 55.67 6.03
2040 161.06 0.21 85.37 0.80 0.16 0.00 5.06 63.28 6.18
2050 176.93 0.21 90.10 0.82 0.16 0.00 6.89 72.42 6.33
2060 194.20 0.21 95.63 0.84 0.16 0.00 7.97 82.91 6.48
Year
H-287
CD-4.5 APPENDIX CD – 4.5
Yadkin Water Supply
Analysis – Entity-Specific
Projection Detail Sheets
H-288
Table of Contents for
Public Water/Wastewater Utility Projection SheetsPages Basin ID No. Entity Facility1 ‐ 2 NWB‐03a Anson County Anson County Filtration Plant3 ‐ 4 NRD‐03d Anson County Anson County Regional WWTP5 ‐ 6 NRD‐03e Anson County Anson County Filtration Plant7 ‐ 8 NRB‐04 Aqua North Carolina, Inc Country Wood WWTP9 ‐ 10 NWL‐05b Asheboro W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake)11 ‐ 12 NWL‐05c Asheboro W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake)13 ‐ 14 NRB‐09 Bradfield Farms Water Company Bradfield Farms WWTP15 ‐ 16 NRB‐11 Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina Hemby Acres WWTP17 ‐ 18 NRB‐13 Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department Mallard Creek WWTP19 ‐ 20 NRB‐14a City of Albemarle Long Creek WWTP21 ‐ 22 NWT‐14b City of Albemarle Tuckertown WTP23 ‐ 24 NRT‐14c City of Albemarle Tuckertown WTP25 ‐ 26 NWN‐14d City of Albemarle US 52 HWY WTP27 ‐ 28 NRB‐84 City of Charlotte Cabarrus Woods WWTP29 ‐ 30 NWB‐15a City of Concord Coddle Creek WTP31 ‐ 32 NRB‐15b City of Concord Coddle Creek WTP33 ‐ 34 NWB‐15d City of Concord Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake)35 ‐ 36 NWD‐91a City of Hamlet Hamlet WTP37 ‐ 38 NRD‐91b City of Hamlet Hamlet WWTP39 ‐ 40 NRH‐16 City of High Point Westside WWTP41 ‐ 42 NWB‐17a City of Kannapolis City of Kannapolis WTP43 ‐ 44 NRB‐17b City of Kannapolis City of Kannapolis WTP45 ‐ 46 NWB‐17c City of Kannapolis City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake Howell)47 ‐ 48 NWH‐18a City of King City of King WTP49 ‐ 50 NRH‐18b City of King City of King WTP51 ‐ 52 NRH‐19a City of Lexington Lexington Regional WWTP53 ‐ 54 NRH‐19b City of Lexington Lexington WTP #1 & 255 ‐ 56 NWH‐19c City of Lexington Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake)57 ‐ 58 NWB‐20a City of Monroe John Glenn WTP59 ‐ 60 NRB‐20b City of Monroe John Glenn WTP61 ‐ 62 NRB‐20c City of Monroe Monroe WWTP63 ‐ 64 NWH‐21a City of Mount Airy F. G. Doggett WTP65 ‐ 66 NRH‐21b City of Mount Airy Mount Airy WWTP67 ‐ 68 NWH‐21c City of Mount Airy S. L. Spencer WTP69 ‐ 70 NRD‐90a City of Rockingham Rockingham WWTP71 ‐ 72 NWD‐90b City of Rockingham Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake)73 ‐ 74 NWD‐90c City of Rockingham Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake)75 ‐ 76 NWH‐22a City of Salisbury Salisbury WTP77 ‐ 78 NRH‐22b City of Salisbury Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP79 ‐ 80 NWH‐23a City of Statesville City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake)81 ‐ 82 NRH‐23b City of Statesville Fourth Creek WWTP83 ‐ 84 NRH‐23c City of Statesville Third Creek WWTP85 ‐ 86 NWH‐24a City of Thomasville City of Thomasville WTP87 ‐ 88 NRH‐24b City of Thomasville Hamby Creek WWTP89 ‐ 90 NRH‐25a City of Winston‐Salem Archie Elledge WWTP91 ‐ 92 NRH‐25b City of Winston‐Salem Muddy Creek WWTP93 ‐ 94 NRH‐25c City of Winston‐Salem P. W. Swann WTP95 ‐ 96 NRH‐25d City of Winston‐Salem R. A. Thomas WTP97 ‐ 98 NWH‐25e City of Winston‐Salem P. W. Swann WTP99 ‐ 100 NWH‐25f City of Winston‐Salem R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP101 ‐ 102 NWH‐27a Davidson Water Inc C. O. Pickle WP103 ‐ 104 NRH‐27b Davidson Water Inc Davidson Water WTP105 ‐ 106 NWH‐28a Davie County Cooleemee WTP107 ‐ 108 NWH‐28b Davie County Sparks Road WTP109 ‐ 110 NRH‐28c Davie County Sparks Road WTP111 ‐ 112 NRH‐28d Davie County Cooleemee WWTP113 ‐ 114 NWH‐87 Energy United Water Energy United Water WTP115 ‐ 116 NRL‐34 Greater Badin Water & Sewer District Badin WWTP117 ‐ 118 NWL‐42 Montgomery County Montgomery County WTP119 ‐ 120 NWB‐88 Richmond County Richmond County WTP121 ‐ 122 NRD‐88b Richmond County Richmond County WTP123 ‐ 124 NRB‐52 Stanly County West Stanly WWTP125 ‐ 126 NRH‐58 Town of Bermuda Run Bermuda Run WWTP127 ‐ 128 NRB‐59 Town of Biscoe Biscoe WWTP129 ‐ 130 NRH‐60 Town of Boonville Boonville WWTP131 ‐ 132 NRH‐86 Town of Cleveland Cleveland WWTP133 ‐ 134 NWT‐61a Town of Denton Denton WP135 ‐ 136 NRT‐61b Town of Denton Denton WWTP137 ‐ 138 NRH‐62 Town of Dobson Dobson WWTP139 ‐ 140 NWH‐63 Town of Elkin Elkin Municipal WTP141 ‐ 142 NWH‐64 Town of Jonesville Jonesville WP143 ‐ 144 NWH‐65a Town of Mocksville Hugh A. Lagle WTP145 ‐ 146 NRH‐65b Town of Mocksville Bear Creek WWTP
Public Water/Wastewater TOC
H-289
Table of Contents for
Public Water/Wastewater Utility Projection SheetsPages Basin ID No. Entity Facility
147 ‐ 148 NRH‐65c Town of Mocksville Dutchman Creek WWTP149 ‐ 150 NRB‐66 Town of Mooresville Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville)151 ‐ 152 NRB‐67 Town of Mount Gilead Mount Gilead WWTP153 ‐ 154 NWH‐68a Town of North Wilkesboro North Wilkesboro WP155 ‐ 156 NRH‐68b Town of North Wilkesboro Thurman Street WWTP157 ‐ 158 NWL‐69a Town of Norwood Norwood WTP159 ‐ 160 NRB‐69b Town of Norwood Norwood WWTP161 ‐ 162 NWH‐70a Town of Pilot Mountain Pilot Mountain WTP163 ‐ 164 NRH‐70b Town of Pilot Mountain Pilot Mountain WTP165 ‐ 166 NRH‐70c Town of Pilot Mountain Pilot Mountain WWTP167 ‐ 168 NRB‐71 Town of Troy Troy WWTP169 ‐ 170 NWD‐93 Town of Wadesboro Town of Wadesboro WTP171 ‐ 172 NRH‐72a Town of Wilkesboro Cub Creek WWTP173 ‐ 174 NWH‐72b Town of Wilkesboro Wilkesboro WFP175 ‐ 176 NWH‐73a Town of Yadkinville Yadkinville WTP177 ‐ 178 NRH‐73b Town of Yadkinville Yadkinville WWTP179 ‐ 180 NRB‐76a Union County Public Works Crooked Creek WWTP #2181 ‐ 182 NRB‐76b Union County Public Works Hunley Creek WWTP183 ‐ 184 NRB‐76c Union County Public Works Grassy Branch WWTP185 ‐ 186 NRB‐76d Union County Public Works Tallwood Estates WWTP187 ‐ 188 NWB‐77a Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County Mt. Pleasant WTF189 ‐ 190 NRB‐77c Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County Rocky River WWTP (WSACC)191 ‐ 192 NWH‐89 Wilkes County Wilkes County WTP (Future)193 ‐ 194 NRH‐81 Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority WWTP
Public Water/Wastewater TOC
H-290
ID No. NWB‐03a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Anson County Type Withdrawal
Facility Anson County Filtration Plant Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.83 5.26 5.30 5.18 5.47 5.60 5.72 6.12 6.00 5.58 5.61 5.28 5.49
2002 6.09 5.44 5.53 6.22 6.09 6.62 6.25 6.30 5.73 5.93 5.51 5.80 5.96
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 5.64 5.46 5.61 5.52 6.05 6.40 7.43 7.36 6.06 5.90 5.04 5.21 5.98
2008 5.18 4.79 5.07 5.08 5.11 5.98 6.19 5.74 5.51 5.05 5.24 5.45 5.37
2009 5.19 5.52 5.24 5.20 5.46 5.80 6.79 5.75 6.33 5.87 5.64 6.01 5.73
2010 6.40 7.92 6.47 6.23 6.39 6.92 6.91 5.86 7.87 5.76 7.98 4.47 6.58
2011 5.85 6.69 6.86 6.48 6.97 7.14 7.33 6.99 6.54 6.45 6.74 7.36 6.78
2012 4.95 5.38 4.47 5.69 6.29 5.94 6.10 6.42 6.34 5.79 5.70 4.89 5.66
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-291
ID No. NWB‐03a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.76 4.58 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.35 4.61 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.35 4.67 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.79 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.91 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.03 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.16 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Anson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 4.58 Jan 0.92
2015 4.61 Feb 0.99
2020 4.67 Mar 0.93
2030 4.79 Apr 0.95
2040 4.91 May 1.00
2050 5.03 Jun 1.06
2060 5.16 Jul 1.13
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.07
Oct 0.96
Nov 1.01
Dec 0.92
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Projected Annual Average Flow values below exclude wholesale water sold to Union County. Wholesale
water is accounted for under entities NWB‐03b and NWB‐03c using a different forecasting method.
Wholesale flows shown above include both raw and treated water.
‐‐
‐‐
H-292
ID No. NRD‐03d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Anson County Type Return
Facility Anson County Regional WWTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.52 2.68 2.41 2.54 2.33 2.13 2.44 2.35 2.20 2.35 2.36 2.00 2.36
2002 1.37 1.24 1.13 1.04 1.00 0.86 0.90 0.94 1.00 1.18 1.36 1.41 1.12
2003 1.39 1.82 2.15 1.75 1.46 1.48 1.19 1.39 1.06 1.07 1.01 1.01 1.40
2004 1.00 1.36 1.23 1.53 1.05 1.07 0.94 1.00 1.83 1.16 1.09 1.10 1.20
2005 1.55 1.56 1.74 1.72 1.24 1.24 1.13 1.12 0.94 1.28 1.18 1.59 1.36
2006 1.44 1.35 1.23 1.13 1.15 1.38 1.04 1.27 1.04 1.18 2.06 1.55 1.32
2007 1.82 1.61 1.70 1.34 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.02 1.08 1.09 1.02 1.21 1.26
2008 1.34 1.35 1.47 1.57 1.15 1.05 1.35 1.67 1.60 1.32 1.24 1.49 1.38
2009 1.44 1.40 1.85 1.54 1.32 1.16 1.04 1.05 0.92 0.98 1.22 1.65 1.30
2010 1.87 2.16 1.71 1.33 1.38 1.23 1.09 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.19 1.43 1.41
2011 1.26 1.34 1.51 1.40 1.32 1.17 1.11 1.13 1.16 1.19 1.17 1.23 1.25
2012 1.31 1.36 1.44 1.35 1.42 1.16 0.84 1.09 1.55 1.49 1.49 1.76 1.36
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-293
ID No. NRD‐03d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.34 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.35 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.37 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.40 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.44 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.47 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Anson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.34 Jan 1.14
2015 1.35 Feb 1.16
2020 1.37 Mar 1.22
2030 1.40 Apr 1.07
2040 1.44 May 0.97
2050 1.47 Jun 0.87
2060 1.51 Jul 0.81
Aug 0.91
Sep 0.94
Oct 0.91
Nov 0.92
Dec 1.10
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
H-294
ID No. NRD‐03e Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Anson County Type Return
Facility Anson County Filtration Plant Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.53 0.48 0.56 0.58 0.70 0.50 0.43 0.58 0.55 0.64 0.49 0.60 0.55
2002 0.67 0.58 0.64 0.61 0.52 0.71 0.44 0.58 0.69 0.62 0.72 0.67 0.62
2003 0.69 0.67 0.53 0.65 0.61 0.64 0.69 0.61 0.98 0.71 0.61 0.64 0.67
2004 0.72 0.67 0.52 0.51 0.60 0.64 0.64 0.53 1.15 0.60 0.64 0.60 0.65
2005 0.67 0.58 0.58 0.48 0.48 0.56 0.45 0.49 0.45 0.58 0.60 0.64 0.55
2006 0.72 0.55 0.45 0.48 0.62 1.07 0.45 0.58 0.53 0.58 0.69 0.87 0.63
2007 0.73 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.56 0.64 0.72 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.49 0.67 0.66
2008 0.78 0.61 0.66 0.54 0.58 0.53 0.88 0.85 0.75 0.66 0.67 0.79 0.69
2009 0.48 0.64 0.61 0.60 0.72 0.56 0.78 0.67 0.73 0.55 0.80 0.84 0.66
2010 0.78 0.72 0.69 0.48 0.53 0.78 0.78 0.26 0.17 0.20 0.30 0.31 0.50
2011 0.31 0.36 0.44 0.29 0.36 0.27 0.46 0.35 0.56 0.56 1.03 0.56 0.46
2012 0.85 0.65 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.81 0.85 0.58 0.59 0.58 0.53 0.55 0.61
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-295
ID No. NRD‐03e
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.52 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.53 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.53 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.55 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.56 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.58 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.59 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Anson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.52 Jan 1.10
2015 0.53 Feb 1.05
2020 0.53 Mar 1.01
2030 0.55 Apr 0.87
2040 0.56 May 0.89
2050 0.58 Jun 1.00
2060 0.59 Jul 1.25
Aug 0.92
Sep 0.94
Oct 0.87
Nov 1.06
Dec 1.04
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
H-296
ID No. NRB‐04 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities ‐ Domestic
Entity Aqua North Carolina, Inc Type Return
Facility Country Wood WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05
2002 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.11
2003 0.11 0.16 0.19 0.20 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.14
2004 0.11 0.18 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.14
2005 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.18 0.16 0.24 0.18
2006 0.22 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.28 0.24 0.20
2007 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.20
2008 0.22 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.22 0.20
2009 0.21 0.19 0.30 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.28 0.32 0.21
2010 0.28 0.30 0.22 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.23
2011 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.23 ND 0.23
2012 0.29 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.22 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.22
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-297
ID No. NRB‐04
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.24 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.26 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.31 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.44 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.52 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.23 Jan 1.15
2015 0.24 Feb 1.12
2020 0.26 Mar 1.14
2030 0.31 Apr 0.93
2040 0.37 May 0.94
2050 0.44 Jun 1.00
2060 0.52 Jul 0.93
Aug 0.95
Sep 0.87
Oct 0.88
Nov 0.98
Dec 1.11
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-298
ID No. NWL‐05b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Asheboro Type Withdrawal
Facility W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Lucas intake) Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.71 1.67 1.63 1.67 1.82 1.91 1.91 1.87 1.80 1.75 1.59 1.53 1.74
2002 1.78 1.79 1.70 1.87 1.92 2.05 1.92 2.07 1.85 1.78 1.69 1.66 1.84
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.67 1.71 1.73 1.74 1.94 1.98 1.95 2.33 2.19 2.12 1.79 1.45 1.88
2008 1.59 1.50 1.47 1.45 1.50 2.13 2.05 2.21 1.96 1.84 1.67 1.63 1.75
2009 1.63 1.35 1.38 1.41 1.46 1.56 1.73 1.85 1.79 1.61 1.41 1.35 1.55
2010 1.36 1.38 1.41 1.50 1.56 1.71 1.74 1.79 1.82 1.65 1.58 1.36 1.57
2011 1.32 1.45 1.44 1.42 1.54 1.80 1.79 1.69 1.70 1.62 1.55 1.38 1.56
2012 1.35 1.42 1.47 1.54 1.61 1.74 1.87 1.80 1.77 1.63 1.53 1.43 1.60
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all Asheboro facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-299
ID No. NWL‐05b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.58 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.07 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.91 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.30 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.58 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.09 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.47 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.58 Jan 0.90
2015 2.07 Feb 0.89
2020 2.91 Mar 0.90
2030 3.30 Apr 0.91
2040 3.58 May 0.97
2050 4.09 Jun 1.10
2060 4.47 Jul 1.12
Aug 1.18
Sep 1.13
Oct 1.06
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.87
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
‐‐
‐‐
H-300
ID No. NWL‐05c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Asheboro Type Withdrawal
Facility W. L. Brown Jr WTP (Lake Reese intake) Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.02 2.96 2.89 2.95 3.22 3.38 3.38 3.31 3.19 3.10 2.81 2.71 3.08
2002 3.15 3.18 3.02 3.31 3.40 3.62 3.41 3.66 3.27 3.15 2.99 2.94 3.26
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.96 3.04 3.05 3.07 3.43 3.50 3.46 4.13 3.87 3.76 3.17 2.57 3.34
2008 2.82 2.66 2.60 2.56 2.66 3.77 3.63 3.91 3.46 3.25 2.95 2.89 3.10
2009 2.88 2.39 2.45 2.49 2.59 2.77 3.07 3.28 3.17 2.85 2.50 2.39 2.74
2010 2.40 2.44 2.50 2.66 2.76 3.02 3.08 3.17 3.21 2.91 2.79 2.41 2.78
2011 2.33 2.57 2.54 2.51 2.73 3.19 3.17 2.99 3.01 2.87 2.75 2.44 2.76
2012 2.38 2.52 2.60 2.72 2.84 3.09 3.30 3.19 3.12 2.88 2.71 2.54 2.82
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all Asheboro facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-301
ID No. NWL‐05c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.79 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.67 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.15 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.84 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.33 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.23 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.91 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.79 Jan 0.90
2015 3.67 Feb 0.89
2020 5.15 Mar 0.90
2030 5.84 Apr 0.91
2040 6.33 May 0.97
2050 7.23 Jun 1.10
2060 7.91 Jul 1.12
Aug 1.18
Sep 1.13
Oct 1.06
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.87
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
‐‐
‐‐
H-302
ID No. NRB‐09 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities ‐ Domestic
Entity Bradfield Farms Water Company Type Return
Facility Bradfield Farms WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12
2002 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.15
2003 0.14 0.19 0.27 0.13 0.03 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.16
2004 0.20 0.19 0.14 0.09 0.07 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.09 0.15 0.12
2005 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.23 0.13
2006 0.34 0.25 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.14
2007 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.22 0.35 0.39 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22
2008 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.23
2009 0.24 0.22 0.26 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.28 0.29 0.25
2010 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27
2011 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
2012 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.28
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-303
ID No. NRB‐09
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.29 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.32 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.39 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.55 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.65 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 2.16%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.77%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Mecklenburg County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.27 Jan 0.91
2015 0.29 Feb 0.91
2020 0.32 Mar 0.94
2030 0.39 Apr 0.95
2040 0.46 May 1.06
2050 0.55 Jun 1.09
2060 0.65 Jul 1.01
Aug 1.05
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.00
Nov 1.02
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-304
ID No. NRB‐11 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities ‐ Domestic
Entity Carolina Water Service Inc of North Carolina Type Return
Facility Hemby Acres WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.13
2002 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.12
2003 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.21 0.16
2004 0.15 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.14
2005 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.16
2006 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.19 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16
2007 0.18 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.13 0.14
2008 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.11 4.47 0.49
2009 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.12
2010 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11
2011 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.10
2012 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-305
ID No. NRB‐11
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.14 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.17 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.24 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.11 Jan 0.75
2015 0.11 Feb 0.75
2020 0.12 Mar 0.72
2030 0.14 Apr 0.66
2040 0.17 May 0.57
2050 0.20 Jun 0.59
2060 0.24 Jul 0.57
Aug 0.60
Sep 0.59
Oct 0.62
Nov 0.74
Dec 4.77
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-306
ID No. NRB‐13 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility Department Type Return
Facility Mallard Creek WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.74 5.07 5.19 5.09 4.83 4.78 5.04 4.92 4.97 5.24 5.46 5.72 5.09
2002 6.78 6.87 5.93 5.09 4.71 4.72 4.85 4.93 5.64 5.62 6.99 4.56 5.54
2003 4.07 8.62 9.44 10.44 9.75 9.06 7.87 7.74 6.49 6.22 7.14 8.77 7.96
2004 7.66 17.71 8.48 8.59 7.02 7.60 7.26 7.65 8.60 7.86 7.63 7.91 8.62
2005 7.65 8.17 8.87 9.28 7.39 7.48 7.55 7.51 7.05 7.46 7.19 7.94 7.79
2006 7.81 7.54 7.42 7.47 7.31 7.46 6.99 8.26 8.39 7.61 8.66 7.73 7.72
2007 8.56 8.03 8.36 8.01 7.75 7.70 7.61 7.72 7.42 7.50 7.16 7.40 7.77
2008 7.65 7.58 7.98 7.87 7.39 6.99 6.99 7.65 7.90 7.32 7.13 7.63 7.51
2009 7.95 7.86 9.49 8.48 8.17 8.14 7.67 7.73 7.59 7.51 8.85 9.15 8.22
2010 9.27 9.65 8.73 7.97 7.85 7.86 7.46 7.76 7.40 7.22 7.24 7.06 7.95
2011 7.63 8.33 9.11 8.94 8.49 7.96 7.94 8.38 8.53 8.42 8.78 8.87 8.45
2012 9.14 8.55 8.20 7.71 7.92 7.79 7.59 7.82 7.83 7.51 7.37 7.39 7.90
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-307
ID No. NRB‐13
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.10 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.63 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.60 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.45 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 13.64 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 16.26 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 19.37 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 2.16%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.77%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Mecklenburg County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 8.10 Jan 1.05
2015 8.63 Feb 1.05
2020 9.60 Mar 1.09
2030 11.45 Apr 1.02
2040 13.64 May 1.00
2050 16.26 Jun 0.97
2060 19.37 Jul 0.95
Aug 0.98
Sep 0.98
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.97
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-308
ID No. NRB‐14a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Albemarle Type Return
Facility Long Creek WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 8.83 9.82 9.13 8.56 7.24 6.29 7.46 6.80 7.49 7.68 9.11 9.43 8.14
2002 11.41 10.90 10.98 9.60 7.68 6.80 5.71 6.72 7.81 9.96 10.94 11.37 9.15
2003 8.93 11.92 14.18 14.01 12.42 12.28 10.58 10.94 8.41 8.08 7.75 8.10 10.62
2004 7.87 11.16 9.86 8.10 7.95 7.38 6.44 7.59 11.15 8.48 9.02 8.51 8.61
2005 9.22 10.42 12.02 10.74 8.44 9.17 8.37 9.01 6.85 7.14 7.50 10.77 9.13
2006 8.97 7.75 7.56 6.85 6.23 7.04 5.78 6.47 7.09 6.95 9.98 8.35 7.41
2007 10.23 9.87 9.33 8.37 6.72 7.28 6.11 6.23 5.92 6.30 6.11 6.45 7.39
2008 5.81 6.31 7.09 7.67 5.87 4.07 3.85 4.78 5.45 4.66 4.88 5.88 5.52
2009 5.80 5.26 9.09 6.12 5.61 4.49 4.89 5.06 5.84 4.84 7.08 8.82 6.08
2010 8.11 9.53 7.70 5.51 5.17 6.01 4.56 4.97 4.58 4.21 3.98 4.11 5.68
2011 4.69 5.81 7.11 6.23 5.03 4.90 4.71 4.55 4.55 5.16 5.29 5.24 5.27
2012 6.34 6.04 6.18 4.74 4.78 3.74 3.89 5.07 5.84 5.32 3.81 4.08 4.99
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-309
ID No. NRB‐14a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.31 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.74 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.42 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.80 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.95 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.20 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.44 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 5.31 Jan 1.17
2015 5.74 Feb 1.23
2020 6.42 Mar 1.33
2030 6.80 Apr 1.11
2040 6.95 May 0.95
2050 7.20 Jun 0.87
2060 7.44 Jul 0.80
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.92
Oct 0.87
Nov 0.89
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) total projected water demand for the entire entity
based on 2012 Local Water Supply Plan, and (b) historic ratio between total wastewater flow and total
water demand, based on the 2010‐2012 average.
‐‐
‐‐
H-310
ID No. NWT‐14b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Albemarle Type Withdrawal
Facility Tuckertown WTP Sub‐basin Tuckertown Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.85 2.93 2.82 2.94 3.09 3.08 3.05 3.11 3.15 3.17 3.00 2.78 3.00
2002 3.47 3.34 3.27 3.47 3.51 3.62 3.52 3.40 3.27 3.24 3.13 2.85 3.34
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.37 2.24 2.22 2.25 2.97 2.69 2.39 2.26 2.69 2.22 2.66 2.34 2.44
2008 2.66 2.69 2.62 2.68 2.58 2.85 2.48 2.74 2.57 2.59 2.49 2.20 2.59
2009 2.25 2.19 2.11 1.95 2.01 2.13 2.25 2.28 2.36 2.31 2.17 2.10 2.18
2010 2.42 2.27 2.34 2.34 2.52 2.60 2.43 2.49 2.46 2.46 2.39 2.22 2.41
2011 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2012 2.25 2.29 2.25 2.29 2.24 2.42 2.42 2.29 2.47 2.25 2.42 2.91 2.38
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Albemarle facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-311
ID No. NWT‐14b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.39 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.34 2.58 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.34 2.89 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.34 3.06 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.68 3.12 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.68 3.23 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.68 3.34 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.39 Jan 1.00
2015 3.92 Feb 0.97
2020 4.22 Mar 0.96
2030 4.39 Apr 0.96
2040 5.80 May 1.03
2050 5.91 Jun 1.06
2060 6.02 Jul 1.00
Aug 1.00
Sep 1.05
Oct 0.99
Nov 1.01
Dec 0.98
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
WTPs' permitted capacities.
Projected Flowrates shown as "Other" are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
Wholesale projected values are based on Catawba IBT agreement requirements for Yadkin River subbasin
flows and the assumption that flows between Albemarle's two WTPs will be split proportional to the
H-312
ID No. NRT‐14c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Albemarle Type Return
Facility Tuckertown WTP Sub‐basin Tuckertown Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 ND 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.10 0.04 0.04
2002 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02
2003 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.03
2004 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01
2006 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2007 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2008 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2009 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 ND ND ND ND ND 0.04
2010 0.20 0.30 0.24 0.18 0.30 0.24 0.26 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.20
2011 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.18 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.12
2012 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-313
ID No. NRT‐14c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.15 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.25 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.15 Jan 1.01
2015 0.25 Feb 1.08
2020 0.27 Mar 1.04
2030 0.28 Apr 1.01
2040 0.37 May 1.18
2050 0.38 Jun 1.33
2060 0.38 Jul 1.18
Aug 0.92
Sep 1.03
Oct 0.83
Nov 0.91
Dec 0.84
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-314
ID No. NWN‐14d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Albemarle Type Withdrawal
Facility US 52 HWY WTP Sub‐basin Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.60 3.70 3.57 3.73 3.91 3.91 3.87 3.93 3.98 4.02 3.80 3.52 3.79
2002 4.39 4.22 4.14 4.39 4.45 4.58 4.45 4.31 4.14 4.10 3.96 3.61 4.23
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 3.00 2.83 2.81 2.85 3.75 3.41 3.03 2.85 3.41 2.81 3.37 2.97 3.09
2008 3.36 3.41 3.31 3.39 3.26 3.61 3.15 3.46 3.25 3.27 3.16 2.78 3.28
2009 2.85 2.77 2.67 2.46 2.55 2.70 2.85 2.88 2.98 2.92 2.75 2.66 2.75
2010 3.07 2.87 2.96 2.96 3.19 3.29 3.07 3.15 3.11 3.11 3.03 2.81 3.05
2011 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2012 2.84 2.90 2.84 2.91 2.84 3.07 3.06 2.91 3.12 2.84 3.07 3.68 3.01
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Albemarle facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-315
ID No. NWN‐14d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.03 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 3.21 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 4.50 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 5.11 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.46 5.53 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.46 6.32 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.46 6.92 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.03 Jan 1.00
2015 5.44 Feb 0.97
2020 6.73 Mar 0.96
2030 7.34 Apr 0.96
2040 10.00 May 1.03
2050 10.79 Jun 1.06
2060 11.38 Jul 1.00
Aug 1.00
Sep 1.05
Oct 0.99
Nov 1.01
Dec 0.98
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
WTPs' permitted capacities.
Projected Flowrates shown as "Other" are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
Wholesale projected values are based on Catawba IBT agreement requirements for Yadkin River subbasin
flows and the assumption that flows between Albemarle's two WTPs will be split proportional to the
H-316
ID No. NWB‐15a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Concord Type Withdrawal
Facility Coddle Creek WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 7.08 6.37 6.12 6.35 7.22 7.11 7.73 7.66 7.54 6.70 5.79 5.50 6.77
2002 7.17 6.72 6.76 7.57 8.28 8.71 8.33 8.31 8.55 8.57 7.47 7.12 7.80
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 8.10 8.43 8.94 9.45 11.31 10.49 10.63 11.80 10.68 9.27 8.12 7.76 9.59
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 7.57 7.37 7.63 8.01 8.12 8.93 8.84 8.38 8.39 8.20 7.51 7.20 8.01
2010 8.34 7.36 7.07 7.81 8.18 8.68 8.63 8.30 8.75 8.46 7.68 7.25 8.05
2011 7.40 7.30 7.36 7.34 7.77 8.96 9.01 9.00 8.41 8.36 7.64 7.17 7.98
2012 8.16 7.02 7.26 7.80 8.51 8.68 8.96 8.51 8.16 8.12 7.77 7.32 8.03
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Concord facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-317
ID No. NWB‐15a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.02 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.34 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.26 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.47 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.12 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 12.24 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 14.09 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 8.02 Jan 0.95
2015 7.34 Feb 0.90
2020 8.26 Mar 0.92
2030 8.47 Apr 0.97
2040 9.12 May 1.05
2050 12.24 Jun 1.10
2060 14.09 Jul 1.11
Aug 1.10
Sep 1.07
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.88
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Yadkin River Basin flows required by Catawba IBT
agreement, (b) historical flow splits between Concord and Kannapolis, and (c) historical flow splits
among Concord's WTP facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
‐‐
‐‐
H-318
ID No. NRB‐15b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Concord Type Return
Facility Coddle Creek WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.36 0.32 0.34 0.37 0.36 0.54 0.41 0.48 0.45 0.34 0.50 0.47 0.41
2002 1.15 0.73 0.73 0.92 0.75 0.89 1.13 0.95 0.87 0.97 1.37 1.44 0.99
2003 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.04 1.80 1.45 1.16 1.59 1.37 0.86 1.13 1.33 1.21
2004 0.38 0.06 0.84 0.96 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.75 0.68 0.50 0.15 0.40 0.59
2005 0.42 0.32 0.22 0.43 0.12 0.15 0.63 0.14 0.19 0.21 0.28 0.26 0.28
2006 0.45 0.14 0.20 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.15 0.28 0.19 0.12 0.09 0.19
2007 0.16 0.19 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.27 0.25 0.39 0.35 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.19
2008 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.16 0.05 0.08 0.21 0.14
2009 0.21 0.26 0.28 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.30 0.26 0.32 0.35 0.36 0.32 0.28
2010 0.39 0.38 0.46 0.29 0.31 0.45 0.56 0.32 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.36 0.39
2011 0.62 0.40 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.35 0.36 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.31 0.36
2012 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.30 0.33 0.37 0.31 0.33 0.38 0.33 0.31
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-319
ID No. NRB‐15b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.36 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.33 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.54 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.63 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.36 Jan 1.05
2015 0.33 Feb 0.98
2020 0.37 Mar 1.03
2030 0.38 Apr 0.84
2040 0.40 May 0.93
2050 0.54 Jun 0.99
2060 0.63 Jul 1.10
Aug 1.04
Sep 1.15
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.97
Dec 0.97
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-320
ID No. NWB‐15d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Concord Type Withdrawal
Facility Hillgrove WTP (Lake Fisher intake) Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.17 1.96 1.88 1.95 2.22 2.18 2.37 2.35 2.31 2.06 1.78 1.69 2.08
2002 2.20 2.06 2.08 2.32 2.54 2.67 2.56 2.55 2.63 2.63 2.29 2.19 2.39
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.49 2.59 2.74 2.90 3.47 3.22 3.26 3.62 3.28 2.84 2.49 2.38 2.94
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 2.32 2.26 2.34 2.46 2.49 2.74 2.71 2.57 2.58 2.52 2.30 2.21 2.46
2010 2.56 2.26 2.17 2.40 2.51 2.66 2.65 2.55 2.69 2.59 2.36 2.22 2.47
2011 2.27 2.24 2.26 2.25 2.39 2.75 2.77 2.76 2.58 2.57 2.34 2.20 2.45
2012 2.51 2.16 2.23 2.40 2.61 2.66 2.75 2.61 2.51 2.49 2.39 2.25 2.46
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Concord facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-321
ID No. NWB‐15d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.46 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.25 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.54 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.60 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.80 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.33 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.46 Jan 0.95
2015 2.25 Feb 0.90
2020 2.54 Mar 0.92
2030 2.60 Apr 0.97
2040 2.80 May 1.05
2050 3.76 Jun 1.10
2060 4.33 Jul 1.11
Aug 1.10
Sep 1.07
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.88
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Yadkin River Basin flows required by Catawba IBT
agreement, (b) historical flow splits between Concord and Kannapolis, and (c) historical flow splits
among Concord's WTP facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
‐‐
‐‐
H-322
ID No. NRH‐16 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of High Point Type Return
Facility Westside WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.36 4.70 4.58 4.06 3.38 3.05 2.92 3.09 2.52 2.67 2.78 2.92 3.41
2002 3.92 3.85 4.38 3.59 3.28 3.23 3.56 3.30 3.99 4.73 4.81 5.43 4.01
2003 4.32 5.33 6.34 6.28 5.64 5.99 4.72 5.86 5.42 3.68 3.38 3.95 5.07
2004 3.47 4.84 4.91 4.43 3.76 3.85 3.43 3.57 4.61 3.78 3.74 4.40 4.06
2005 3.71 4.09 4.77 4.37 3.59 3.40 3.54 3.50 3.01 3.32 3.01 3.87 3.68
2006 3.85 3.51 3.98 4.08 3.53 4.02 3.51 3.41 4.17 3.69 4.87 3.99 3.88
2007 4.50 4.08 4.53 4.67 3.71 3.62 3.28 3.25 3.11 3.55 3.04 3.47 3.73
2008 3.61 3.67 4.54 4.42 3.55 3.14 3.04 3.30 3.68 3.12 3.26 3.85 3.60
2009 3.74 3.42 4.71 3.82 3.64 3.17 2.89 2.68 2.80 3.08 4.37 4.35 3.56
2010 4.13 4.48 3.84 3.54 3.69 3.14 2.96 3.27 3.22 3.18 2.84 4.05 3.52
2011 4.12 4.05 4.55 4.08 4.16 4.07 4.05 3.56 4.05 4.40 4.21 3.91 4.10
2012 3.41 3.13 3.18 2.94 3.07 2.76 2.75 3.21 2.46 2.35 1.99 2.16 2.79
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-323
ID No. NRH‐16
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.47 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.57 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.73 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.08 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.47 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.89 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.35 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2060: 0.91%
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.47 Jan 1.10
2015 3.57 Feb 1.07
2020 3.73 Mar 1.19
2030 4.08 Apr 1.10
2040 4.47 May 1.02
2050 4.89 Jun 0.93
2060 5.35 Jul 0.89
Aug 0.91
Sep 0.91
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.93
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Applied AGR shown above is derived from 2020‐2060 growth in total water demand as listed in the 2012
Local Water Supply Plan.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-324
ID No. NWB‐17a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Kannapolis Type Withdrawal
Facility City of Kannapolis WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 7.81 7.56 5.90 6.24 6.53 6.33 6.50 6.77 6.64 6.15 6.00 5.74 6.51
2002 4.88 5.17 5.18 5.80 6.05 6.67 6.24 6.47 4.87 4.90 4.46 4.51 5.44
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 6.82 6.87 6.99 7.85 7.49 7.95 7.64 8.71 8.60 8.30 8.14 7.93 7.78
2008 9.35 9.25 8.83 4.34 4.44 5.16 4.46 4.72 3.58 3.57 3.83 3.50 5.41
2009 7.30 6.81 7.01 7.07 7.18 7.34 7.43 7.75 7.57 10.24 8.77 6.87 7.62
2010 3.42 3.30 3.31 3.72 3.93 4.17 4.33 4.19 4.11 4.15 3.71 3.62 3.83
2011 4.81 4.69 4.58 4.72 4.89 5.50 5.36 5.46 5.12 4.76 4.71 4.56 4.93
2012 3.00 3.08 2.98 3.13 3.29 3.78 4.03 3.91 3.76 3.77 3.48 3.09 3.44
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Kannapolis facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-325
ID No. NWB‐17a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.07 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.24 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.74 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.03 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.41 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.23 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 4.07 Jan 1.05
2015 3.24 Feb 1.03
2020 3.65 Mar 1.02
2030 3.74 Apr 0.93
2040 4.03 May 0.95
2050 5.41 Jun 1.03
2060 6.23 Jul 1.01
Aug 1.05
Sep 0.99
Oct 1.05
Nov 0.99
Dec 0.90
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Yadkin River Basin flows required by Catawba IBT
agreement, (b) historical flow splits between Concord and Kannapolis, and (c) historical flow splits
among Kannapolis's WTP intakes, based on 2012 flow data.
‐‐
‐‐
H-326
ID No. NRB‐17b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Kannapolis Type Return
Facility City of Kannapolis WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.64 0.52 0.44 0.45 0.63 0.57 0.56 0.67 0.59 0.59 0.61 0.68 0.58
2002 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.31 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.25
2003 0.29 0.22 0.20 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.07 0.05 ND 0.21
2004 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.07
2005 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.57 0.66 0.59 0.55 0.59 0.55 0.54 0.37
2006 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.50 0.49 0.43 0.42 0.36 0.30 0.23 0.42
2007 0.33 0.36 0.45 0.42 0.36 0.31 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.40 0.36 0.39
2008 0.30 0.24 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.35 0.29 0.32 0.29 0.28 0.44 0.26 0.30
2009 0.26 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.28 0.42 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.38 0.35
2010 0.43 0.35 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.39 0.39 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.28 0.19 0.33
2011 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.29 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.20 0.27
2012 0.19 0.18 0.23 0.28 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.27 0.29 0.37 0.23
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-327
ID No. NRB‐17b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.25 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.26 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.28 Jan 0.94
2015 0.22 Feb 0.92
2020 0.25 Mar 1.03
2030 0.26 Apr 1.04
2040 0.28 May 0.97
2050 0.37 Jun 1.00
2060 0.43 Jul 1.00
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.04
Oct 1.00
Nov 1.05
Dec 0.94
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-328
ID No. NWB‐17c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Kannapolis Type Withdrawal
Facility City of Kannapolis WTP (supplemental intake ‐ Lake Howel Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.88 0.86 0.67 0.71 0.74 0.72 0.74 0.77 0.75 0.70 0.68 0.65 0.74
2002 0.55 0.59 0.59 0.66 0.69 0.76 0.71 0.73 0.55 0.55 0.50 0.51 0.62
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.89 0.85 0.90 0.87 0.99 0.97 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88
2008 1.06 1.05 1.00 0.49 0.50 0.58 0.50 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.43 0.40 0.61
2009 0.83 0.77 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.84 0.88 0.86 1.16 0.99 0.78 0.86
2010 0.39 0.37 0.38 0.42 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.42 0.41 0.43
2011 0.55 0.53 0.52 0.53 0.55 0.62 0.61 0.62 0.58 0.54 0.53 0.52 0.56
2012 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.37 0.43 0.46 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.35 0.39
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Kannapolis facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-329
ID No. NWB‐17c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.41 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.42 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.61 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.71 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.46 Jan 1.05
2015 0.37 Feb 1.03
2020 0.41 Mar 1.02
2030 0.42 Apr 0.93
2040 0.46 May 0.95
2050 0.61 Jun 1.03
2060 0.71 Jul 1.01
Aug 1.05
Sep 0.99
Oct 1.05
Nov 0.99
Dec 0.90
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Yadkin River Basin flows required by Catawba IBT
agreement, (b) historical flow splits between Concord and Kannapolis, and (c) historical flow splits
among Kannapolis's WTP intakes, based on 2012 flow data.
‐‐
‐‐
H-330
ID No. NWH‐18a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of King Type Withdrawal
Facility City of King WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.45 1.39 1.52 1.69 2.01 1.86 1.86 1.81 1.59 1.54 1.40 1.42 1.63
2002 1.50 1.49 1.46 1.67 1.73 2.05 1.82 1.84 1.64 1.62 1.54 1.55 1.66
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.17 2.17 2.15 2.21 2.44 2.41 2.40 2.55 2.49 2.26 2.18 2.16 2.30
2008 2.23 2.20 2.21 2.04 1.81 2.08 1.94 1.95 1.78 1.59 1.59 1.61 1.92
2009 1.59 1.56 1.57 1.65 1.70 1.76 1.84 1.85 1.79 1.73 1.66 1.61 1.69
2010 1.61 1.63 1.57 1.75 1.80 1.94 1.97 1.85 1.85 1.73 1.60 1.55 1.74
2011 1.37 1.35 1.34 1.38 1.45 1.78 1.68 1.74 1.63 1.72 1.66 1.67 1.57
2012 2.00 1.68 1.64 1.63 1.73 1.75 1.77 1.74 1.64 1.54 1.50 1.46 1.67
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-331
ID No. NWH‐18a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.66 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.67 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.69 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.73 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.78 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.82 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.87 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Stokes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.66 Jan 1.01
2015 1.67 Feb 0.97
2020 1.69 Mar 0.96
2030 1.73 Apr 0.98
2040 1.78 May 1.00
2050 1.82 Jun 1.08
2060 1.87 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.07
Sep 1.03
Oct 0.97
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.92
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-332
ID No. NRH‐18b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of King Type Return
Facility City of King WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.10
2011 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08
2012 0.07 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.22 0.12 0.15 0.09 0.13
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-333
ID No. NRH‐18b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.10 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.10 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.10 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Stokes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.10 Jan 0.79
2015 0.10 Feb 0.93
2020 0.10 Mar 0.86
2030 0.11 Apr 0.97
2040 0.11 May 1.05
2050 0.11 Jun 1.05
2060 0.11 Jul 1.22
Aug 1.05
Sep 1.30
Oct 0.99
Nov 1.01
Dec 0.84
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-334
ID No. NRH‐19a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Lexington Type Return
Facility Lexington Regional WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.70 4.00 4.06 4.17 3.60 3.45 3.42 3.02 2.94 2.90 3.00 3.20 3.45
2002 3.41 2.82 3.34 2.89 2.71 2.58 2.47 2.54 2.66 3.44 4.00 4.51 3.12
2003 2.38 3.51 4.38 4.79 3.45 4.58 3.74 4.51 4.59 3.02 3.39 4.29 3.88
2004 2.93 2.41 4.17 2.96 2.38 2.72 3.14 2.04 3.75 2.66 3.34 3.31 2.99
2005 2.95 3.59 3.21 3.59 2.88 2.83 3.15 3.11 2.52 2.86 2.65 3.90 3.10
2006 3.51 2.90 2.71 2.94 2.15 3.41 2.77 2.87 3.29 2.88 4.37 3.04 3.07
2007 3.79 3.34 3.36 3.48 2.12 2.50 2.21 1.83 1.72 2.40 1.73 2.10 2.54
2008 2.11 2.44 2.61 2.80 2.05 1.47 1.76 1.96 3.06 2.18 2.06 2.73 2.27
2009 2.64 2.16 3.60 2.90 3.23 3.09 1.93 2.54 2.54 2.82 4.50 4.55 3.05
2010 3.90 4.11 3.84 2.95 3.20 2.66 2.67 3.05 2.58 3.11 3.70 2.81 3.21
2011 2.88 2.82 3.64 3.17 2.94 2.44 2.58 2.32 2.52 2.73 3.61 3.48 2.93
2012 2.94 2.77 2.77 2.59 2.82 2.49 2.61 2.70 2.67 2.54 2.13 2.17 2.60
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-335
ID No. NRH‐19a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.91 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.02 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.19 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.31 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.45 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.59 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.74 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.91 Jan 1.10
2015 3.02 Feb 1.06
2020 3.19 Mar 1.19
2030 3.31 Apr 1.08
2040 3.45 May 0.99
2050 3.59 Jun 0.88
2060 3.74 Jul 0.83
Aug 0.87
Sep 0.91
Oct 0.95
Nov 1.07
Dec 1.07
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WWTP return to WTP use from 2002‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-336
ID No. NRH‐19b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Lexington Type Return
Facility Lexington WTP #1 & 2 Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.29 0.27 0.24 0.25 0.30 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.23 0.26
2002 0.30 0.37 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.35 0.36 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31
2003 0.28 0.32 0.25 0.25 0.19 0.24 0.29 0.32 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.26
2004 0.32 0.32 0.24 0.32 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.31 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.29
2005 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.24 0.37 0.32 0.34 0.26 0.27 0.34 0.28 0.28 0.29
2006 0.27 0.23 0.31 0.25 0.31 0.35 0.27 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.29 0.28 0.29
2007 0.32 0.31 0.28 0.31 0.36 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.30 0.27 0.30
2008 0.23 0.29 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.31 0.24 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.23 0.25
2009 0.27 0.27 0.33 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.29 0.26 0.23 0.28 0.27
2010 0.31 0.40 0.26 0.27 0.38 0.28 0.49 0.14 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.27
2011 0.15 0.38 0.35 0.38 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.17 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.41 0.26
2012 0.49 0.47 0.19 0.22 0.21 0.31 0.25 0.35 0.32 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.29
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-337
ID No. NRH‐19b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.53 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.55 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.57 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.59 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.62 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.48 Jan 1.08
2015 0.50 Feb 1.29
2020 0.53 Mar 1.01
2030 0.55 Apr 1.01
2040 0.57 May 0.98
2050 0.59 Jun 0.97
2060 0.62 Jul 1.11
Aug 0.89
Sep 0.96
Oct 0.84
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.95
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-338
ID No. NWH‐19c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Lexington Type Withdrawal
Facility Lexington WTP (Lake Thom‐A‐Lex Intake) Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.50 3.37 3.56 3.74 3.94 4.11 4.31 4.34 4.12 4.14 3.88 3.45 3.87
2002 3.09 3.00 2.99 3.33 3.42 3.96 3.63 3.51 3.24 3.07 3.06 3.11 3.28
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.83 2.84 2.95 2.98 3.36 3.39 3.43 3.93 3.59 3.34 3.03 2.85 3.21
2008 2.82 2.83 2.80 2.93 2.98 3.33 3.21 3.20 2.98 2.81 2.77 2.70 2.95
2009 2.71 2.77 2.63 2.48 2.77 2.76 2.97 2.93 2.73 2.47 2.31 2.44 2.66
2010 2.42 2.45 2.53 2.65 2.85 3.06 3.12 2.90 2.84 2.81 2.50 2.59 2.73
2011 2.53 2.52 2.46 2.75 2.75 3.19 3.31 3.03 2.84 2.75 2.63 2.69 2.79
2012 2.36 2.39 2.50 2.66 2.88 2.99 3.01 2.86 2.68 2.53 2.42 2.34 2.64
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-339
ID No. NWH‐19c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.72 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.82 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.98 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.09 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.22 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.35 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.49 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.72 Jan 0.92
2015 2.82 Feb 0.93
2020 2.98 Mar 0.94
2030 3.09 Apr 0.97
2040 3.22 May 1.04
2050 3.35 Jun 1.10
2060 3.49 Jul 1.12
Aug 1.11
Sep 1.04
Oct 0.98
Nov 0.92
Dec 0.92
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections were developed from the LWSP.
Projections for 2020‐2060 are directly from the LWSP; 2015 data was interpolated
‐‐
‐‐
H-340
ID No. NWB‐20a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Monroe Type Withdrawal
Facility John Glenn WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 6.62 7.07 6.90 7.33 7.61 7.71 7.48 7.13 7.13 6.72 6.19 6.15 7.00
2002 6.77 6.64 6.22 7.17 7.28 8.10 8.11 7.16 6.39 6.38 6.08 6.09 6.87
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 5.78 5.41 6.17 6.58 7.27 7.18 7.00 7.28 6.74 5.82 4.93 4.59 6.23
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 5.20 5.00 5.30 5.80 5.90 6.20 6.40 5.90 6.10 5.80 5.30 5.20 5.68
2010 5.27 5.35 5.64 6.08 6.68 6.71 6.81 6.31 6.45 5.93 5.66 5.60 6.04
2011 5.80 5.40 5.30 5.80 6.70 6.70 6.90 6.70 6.70 6.40 5.90 5.80 6.18
2012 5.74 5.47 5.75 5.90 6.02 6.57 6.33 6.09 6.04 5.98 5.47 5.35 5.89
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-341
ID No. NWB‐20a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.04 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.38 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.98 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.30 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.86 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.71 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 13.92 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 6.04 Jan 0.93
2015 6.38 Feb 0.89
2020 6.98 Mar 0.94
2030 8.30 Apr 1.00
2040 9.86 May 1.08
2050 11.71 Jun 1.11
2060 13.92 Jul 1.11
Aug 1.07
Sep 1.07
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.91
Dec 0.88
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-342
ID No. NRB‐20b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Monroe Type Return
Facility John Glenn WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.43 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.56 0.51 0.30 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.33 0.33 0.39
2002 0.27 0.25 0.28 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.34 0.43 0.31 0.32
2003 0.35 0.28 0.40 0.43 0.42 0.53 0.43 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.39 0.37 0.40
2004 0.31 0.27 0.44 0.52 0.33 0.37 0.44 0.27 0.39 0.28 0.27 0.46 0.36
2005 0.44 0.48 0.37 0.46 0.59 0.80 0.62 0.49 0.62 0.23 0.55 0.58 0.52
2006 0.52 0.59 0.84 0.58 1.04 1.14 1.12 0.69 0.92 0.97 1.02 0.51 0.83
2007 0.38 0.34 0.69 1.04 0.67 0.94 0.90 0.82 1.10 0.85 0.73 0.82 0.77
2008 0.76 0.79 0.74 0.75 0.74 0.76 0.66 0.65 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.81 0.76
2009 0.79 0.87 0.84 0.81 0.60 0.87 0.78 0.77 0.84 0.84 0.82 0.72 0.79
2010 0.57 0.68 0.67 0.71 0.85 0.61 0.75 0.64 0.65 0.83 0.87 0.76 0.72
2011 0.69 0.57 0.61 0.84 0.86 0.69 0.78 0.62 0.69 0.67 0.74 0.76 0.71
2012 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.72 0.62 0.80 0.88 0.85 0.87 0.71 0.85 0.87 0.78
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-343
ID No. NRB‐20b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.74 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.78 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.85 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.01 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.20 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.43 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.70 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.74 Jan 0.87
2015 0.78 Feb 0.88
2020 0.85 Mar 0.93
2030 1.01 Apr 1.08
2040 1.20 May 0.96
2050 1.43 Jun 1.03
2060 1.70 Jul 1.05
Aug 0.96
Sep 1.09
Oct 1.04
Nov 1.07
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-344
ID No. NRB‐20c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Monroe Type Return
Facility Monroe WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 8.83 9.64 8.68 8.39 6.38 6.13 6.89 6.10 5.82 6.27 6.00 6.82 7.15
2002 7.56 6.87 7.03 6.19 5.78 5.73 5.36 5.74 6.09 7.19 7.74 8.30 6.63
2003 6.76 10.40 11.10 10.97 8.87 8.44 7.76 8.29 6.25 5.98 5.00 6.55 8.02
2004 5.91 8.67 7.13 6.01 5.56 6.79 6.53 7.41 9.78 6.96 6.56 6.89 7.01
2005 7.13 8.10 9.49 7.67 5.80 7.39 6.20 7.10 5.55 6.35 5.97 8.52 7.10
2006 7.89 7.41 6.07 5.61 5.56 7.44 5.61 6.77 6.74 6.97 9.06 7.56 6.88
2007 9.82 8.87 8.12 6.32 5.51 5.99 5.58 5.77 5.55 5.72 5.17 5.74 6.50
2008 6.27 7.44 7.62 7.53 5.62 5.01 5.24 6.50 6.39 6.00 5.87 7.40 6.40
2009 7.16 6.79 9.45 6.42 5.49 5.30 5.13 4.99 4.54 5.07 7.26 9.19 6.40
2010 9.15 10.10 7.77 5.38 5.80 6.82 5.81 5.70 5.43 4.71 4.93 5.33 6.39
2011 5.71 6.23 7.66 6.48 6.18 5.27 4.86 5.36 5.45 5.78 5.75 5.40 5.84
2012 7.25 5.85 6.34 5.65 5.57 4.98 5.40 7.25 6.51 5.61 4.93 6.05 5.95
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-345
ID No. NRB‐20c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.06 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.40 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.01 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.33 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.89 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.76 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 13.97 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 6.06 Jan 1.21
2015 6.40 Feb 1.21
2020 7.01 Mar 1.25
2030 8.33 Apr 1.01
2040 9.89 May 0.91
2050 11.76 Jun 0.89
2060 13.97 Jul 0.85
Aug 0.95
Sep 0.90
Oct 0.88
Nov 0.90
Dec 1.04
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Projections for the flow portion allotted to Union County are calculated separately as entity NRB‐20d;
those flows are excluded from the numbers shown here.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-346
ID No. NWH‐21a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Mount Airy Type Withdrawal
Facility F. G. Doggett WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.75 3.79 3.76 4.01 3.98 3.91 3.88 4.04 4.21 4.15 3.72 3.36 3.88
2002 2.38 2.33 2.22 2.50 2.73 2.80 2.82 3.18 2.83 2.86 2.58 2.30 2.63
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.49 2.49 2.40 2.49 2.56 2.46 2.35 2.24 1.90 1.86 1.57 1.48 2.19
2008 1.64 1.83 1.62 1.56 1.59 1.79 1.72 1.61 1.53 1.53 1.37 1.47 1.61
2009 1.53 1.59 1.52 1.37 1.56 1.71 1.79 1.69 1.62 1.61 1.53 1.37 1.57
2010 1.29 1.43 1.56 1.71 1.91 2.07 1.94 1.87 1.70 1.53 1.56 1.80 1.70
2011 1.47 1.85 1.97 2.09 2.18 1.84 1.66 1.66 1.59 1.60 1.49 1.84 1.77
2012 2.44 2.44 2.52 2.52 2.57 2.46 2.69 2.66 2.48 2.64 2.65 2.61 2.56
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Mount Airy facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-347
ID No. NWH‐21a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.01 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.02 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.05 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.10 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.15 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.21 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.26 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.01 Jan 0.95
2015 2.02 Feb 1.02
2020 2.05 Mar 1.02
2030 2.10 Apr 1.03
2040 2.15 May 1.09
2050 2.21 Jun 1.08
2060 2.26 Jul 1.07
Aug 1.03
Sep 0.95
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.89
Dec 0.93
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-348
ID No. NRH‐21b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Mount Airy Type Return
Facility Mount Airy WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.07 4.59 3.65 6.10 6.02 5.89 5.73 5.18 4.87 5.03 4.57 4.19 4.99
2002 4.51 2.75 3.04 2.87 2.95 3.09 3.22 3.41 3.16 3.20 3.35 3.11 3.23
2003 3.43 4.05 4.16 3.72 3.29 3.96 3.50 4.09 3.27 3.29 2.69 3.19 3.55
2004 3.22 3.02 2.76 2.92 2.69 2.70 2.66 2.51 3.16 3.14 3.13 3.09 2.91
2005 2.96 2.91 2.86 2.21 1.90 2.25 2.15 2.40 2.70 2.87 2.40 2.40 2.50
2006 2.87 2.62 2.65 2.51 2.73 2.95 2.93 2.87 2.97 2.77 2.92 2.37 2.76
2007 2.59 2.05 2.80 2.37 2.24 2.18 1.84 1.78 1.89 1.64 1.40 1.63 2.03
2008 1.61 1.76 1.61 1.69 1.50 1.41 1.34 1.31 1.35 1.43 1.31 1.48 1.48
2009 1.65 1.33 1.63 1.38 1.74 1.68 1.19 1.19 1.08 1.36 2.01 2.69 1.58
2010 2.67 3.00 2.82 2.34 2.10 1.84 1.76 1.84 1.76 1.84 1.71 2.04 2.14
2011 1.85 1.96 2.68 2.54 2.49 2.26 1.81 1.73 1.88 1.83 1.66 2.40 2.09
2012 1.98 1.85 2.42 1.92 2.40 1.74 1.61 1.49 1.54 1.39 1.25 1.38 1.75
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-349
ID No. NRH‐21b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.99 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.01 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.09 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.14 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.19 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.25 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.99 Jan 1.11
2015 2.01 Feb 1.08
2020 2.03 Mar 1.26
2030 2.09 Apr 1.11
2040 2.14 May 1.13
2050 2.19 Jun 1.00
2060 2.25 Jul 0.86
Aug 0.84
Sep 0.86
Oct 0.86
Nov 0.84
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-350
ID No. NWH‐21c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Mount Airy Type Withdrawal
Facility S. L. Spencer WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.09 1.10 1.09 1.17 1.15 1.14 1.13 1.18 1.22 1.21 1.08 0.98 1.13
2002 0.69 0.68 0.65 0.73 0.79 0.81 0.82 0.92 0.82 0.83 0.75 0.67 0.76
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.72 0.72 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.72 0.68 0.65 0.55 0.54 0.46 0.43 0.64
2008 0.48 0.53 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.52 0.50 0.47 0.45 0.44 0.40 0.43 0.47
2009 0.44 0.46 0.44 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.52 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.45 0.40 0.46
2010 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.56 0.54 0.50 0.45 0.45 0.52 0.49
2011 0.43 0.54 0.57 0.61 0.63 0.54 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.53 0.51
2012 0.71 0.71 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.72 0.78 0.77 0.72 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.74
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Mount Airy facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-351
ID No. NWH‐21c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.58 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.59 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.60 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.61 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.63 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.64 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.66 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.58 Jan 0.95
2015 0.59 Feb 1.02
2020 0.60 Mar 1.02
2030 0.61 Apr 1.03
2040 0.63 May 1.09
2050 0.64 Jun 1.08
2060 0.66 Jul 1.07
Aug 1.03
Sep 0.95
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.89
Dec 0.93
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-352
ID No. NWH‐22a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Salisbury Type Withdrawal
Facility Salisbury WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 7.88 7.51 7.63 7.74 8.03 8.28 8.61 8.73 8.58 8.26 7.80 6.88 8.00
2002 5.60 5.50 5.40 6.20 6.60 7.70 7.40 7.10 6.00 5.90 5.50 6.00 6.25
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 6.20 6.30 6.30 6.50 7.70 8.90 8.80 10.60 9.60 8.60 6.60 6.00 7.68
2008 6.20 6.10 6.00 6.20 6.90 8.90 9.30 9.40 8.50 7.70 6.70 7.30 7.44
2009 6.70 6.60 6.50 6.90 7.50 9.30 10.20 10.40 9.00 7.70 6.40 6.50 7.82
2010 7.70 7.10 6.50 6.80 7.60 9.60 10.20 9.70 9.70 9.00 7.60 7.20 8.23
2011 7.70 7.50 7.30 7.50 8.60 9.30 10.50 9.90 9.40 8.60 7.80 7.10 8.44
2012 7.50 7.90 7.50 9.20 9.40 9.80 10.20 9.80 9.30 8.60 7.90 7.50 8.72
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-353
ID No. NWH‐22a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.46 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.66 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.98 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.68 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.43 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.24 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 12.11 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2060: 0.75%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 8.46 Jan 0.87
2015 8.66 Feb 0.86
2020 8.98 Mar 0.83
2030 9.68 Apr 0.89
2040 10.43 May 0.99
2050 11.24 Jun 1.15
2060 12.11 Jul 1.22
Aug 1.24
Sep 1.15
Oct 1.04
Nov 0.89
Dec 0.86
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
County AGR determined to be too low for Salisbury; LWSP Projections very high
considering the service area and potential growth; AGR estimated to be 0.75%
‐‐
‐‐
H-354
ID No. NRH‐22b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Salisbury Type Return
Facility Salisbury‐Rowan WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.98 5.36 5.38 5.47 4.62 4.37 4.46 3.91 3.76 3.85 3.89 4.40 4.53
2002 6.94 6.42 7.26 6.20 5.89 5.72 5.66 5.89 6.21 7.34 8.28 9.86 6.81
2003 7.88 9.66 11.46 13.30 11.15 10.88 8.38 8.91 8.36 7.37 6.97 7.79 9.33
2004 6.99 8.57 8.09 8.13 7.08 6.66 7.11 7.57 9.37 7.87 8.23 9.04 7.89
2005 8.62 9.32 10.47 8.85 7.24 7.65 8.40 7.38 6.37 6.90 6.86 8.98 8.08
2006 8.61 7.85 7.44 7.39 6.92 7.22 6.56 6.56 7.25 6.91 9.05 7.73 7.45
2007 9.48 8.54 9.20 8.68 6.84 6.66 6.41 6.12 6.05 6.53 6.26 6.56 7.27
2008 6.64 7.47 7.98 8.46 6.92 6.30 6.30 7.41 7.20 6.68 6.71 8.84 7.24
2009 7.92 7.03 10.06 8.37 7.16 8.40 6.32 6.20 6.09 6.25 9.00 10.66 7.79
2010 10.15 11.17 9.20 8.07 8.07 7.57 6.44 6.81 6.19 6.06 6.13 6.45 7.67
2011 6.57 7.25 8.42 7.61 6.78 6.55 6.45 5.86 6.35 6.51 8.42 8.46 7.10
2012 7.65 8.70 7.02 6.27 6.96 6.22 5.52 5.27 5.27 5.66 5.29 5.51 6.27
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-355
ID No. NRH‐22b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.01 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.19 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.46 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.04 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 8.67 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 9.34 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.06 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 7.01 Jan 1.12
2015 7.19 Feb 1.16
2020 7.46 Mar 1.20
2030 8.04 Apr 1.10
2040 8.67 May 0.99
2050 9.34 Jun 0.96
2060 10.06 Jul 0.86
Aug 0.87
Sep 0.86
Oct 0.87
Nov 0.96
Dec 1.07
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-356
ID No. NWH‐23a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Statesville Type Withdrawal
Facility City of Statesville WTP (S. Yadkin River intake) Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 4.71 4.77 4.68 4.89 5.22 5.32 5.35 5.44 5.47 5.76 5.34 5.18 5.18
2002 4.25 4.21 4.29 4.84 5.06 5.56 4.47 3.11 2.61 2.93 2.91 2.90 3.92
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 3.57 3.78 4.03 3.71 4.83 4.62 4.32 5.09 4.40 4.02 3.56 3.51 4.12
2008 3.47 3.35 3.04 3.30 3.48 4.07 3.86 3.54 3.36 3.37 3.21 2.98 3.42
2009 3.04 2.98 3.19 3.07 3.09 3.27 3.62 3.37 3.25 3.04 2.96 2.85 3.14
2010 3.05 3.15 3.00 3.27 3.35 3.54 3.67 3.60 3.73 3.36 3.04 2.97 3.31
2011 2.93 2.95 2.98 3.08 3.21 3.57 3.42 3.47 3.35 3.17 3.03 2.87 3.17
2012 2.85 2.85 2.94 3.01 3.22 3.27 3.44 3.33 3.23 3.12 3.17 2.99 3.12
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-357
ID No. NWH‐23a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.20 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.86 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.97 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.37 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.79 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.28 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.85 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.20 Jan 0.93
2015 3.86 Feb 0.94
2020 4.97 Mar 0.95
2030 5.37 Apr 0.96
2040 5.79 May 1.04
2050 6.28 Jun 1.10
2060 6.85 Jul 1.10
Aug 1.10
Sep 1.05
Oct 0.99
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.90
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections were developed from the LWSP.
Projections for 2020‐2060 are directly from the LWSP; 2015 data was interpolated
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-358
ID No. NRH‐23b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Statesville Type Return
Facility Fourth Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.89 3.54 3.22 3.37 2.81 2.69 2.75 2.76 2.70 2.87 2.72 3.23 2.96
2002 2.60 2.36 2.59 2.30 2.39 2.69 2.73 2.35 2.42 2.61 3.11 3.28 2.62
2003 2.80 3.16 3.90 4.04 3.27 3.26 3.01 2.95 2.76 2.65 2.72 2.85 3.11
2004 2.64 3.01 2.79 2.80 2.74 2.67 2.51 2.61 3.16 2.69 3.13 3.21 2.83
2005 3.05 3.16 3.14 2.90 2.73 2.54 2.65 2.75 2.59 2.48 2.41 2.79 2.76
2006 2.94 2.57 2.74 2.81 2.61 2.67 2.49 2.67 2.84 3.04 2.93 2.97 2.78
2007 3.23 2.88 3.38 3.01 3.37 2.94 2.82 2.91 2.78 3.00 2.89 2.99 3.02
2008 2.93 3.09 3.31 3.19 2.74 3.01 2.75 3.12 3.13 2.83 2.86 3.35 3.03
2009 3.38 2.77 3.47 3.26 3.39 3.53 2.80 2.98 2.91 2.95 3.26 3.40 3.18
2010 3.70 3.68 3.40 3.26 3.34 3.02 3.06 3.05 3.08 2.87 2.71 2.73 3.16
2011 2.61 2.73 3.12 2.89 2.78 2.34 2.28 2.10 2.20 2.06 2.18 2.23 2.46
2012 2.11 2.08 2.14 2.05 2.37 2.07 2.09 2.02 2.18 2.03 1.90 2.02 2.09
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-359
ID No. NRH‐23b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.14 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.04 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.37 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.11 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.57 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.57 Jan 1.06
2015 3.14 Feb 1.02
2020 4.04 Mar 1.11
2030 4.37 Apr 1.04
2040 4.71 May 1.06
2050 5.11 Jun 1.00
2060 5.57 Jul 0.93
Aug 0.96
Sep 0.96
Oct 0.93
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on (a) LWSP projected water use and (b) historic ratio of WWTP flows to WTP flows
(using 2010‐2012 average to determine ratio).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-360
ID No. NRH‐23c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Statesville Type Return
Facility Third Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.08 2.24 2.16 2.27 1.95 1.91 1.77 1.75 1.97 2.00 1.84 1.85 1.98
2002 1.71 1.47 1.43 1.35 1.37 1.28 1.27 1.16 1.20 1.03 1.11 1.12 1.29
2003 0.91 1.45 1.91 1.95 1.53 1.62 1.33 1.35 1.03 1.11 1.21 1.27 1.39
2004 1.16 1.44 1.66 1.82 1.54 1.57 1.34 1.27 1.58 1.24 1.79 2.08 1.54
2005 1.53 1.54 2.04 1.38 1.27 1.44 1.33 1.35 1.28 1.47 1.37 1.56 1.46
2006 1.63 1.31 1.29 1.43 1.27 1.30 1.11 1.35 1.34 1.38 1.64 1.23 1.36
2007 1.77 1.72 1.79 ND 1.34 1.30 1.29 1.21 1.42 1.32 1.23 1.43 1.44
2008 1.31 1.35 1.35 1.45 1.08 1.06 1.15 1.24 1.28 1.19 1.11 1.38 1.25
2009 1.31 1.30 1.75 1.29 1.36 1.31 0.98 1.04 1.08 1.17 1.54 1.75 1.32
2010 1.61 1.98 1.53 1.50 1.80 1.48 1.26 1.39 1.41 1.18 1.13 1.23 1.46
2011 1.14 1.19 1.37 0.93 0.81 0.70 0.62 0.74 0.88 0.73 0.88 0.91 0.91
2012 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.80 0.88 0.78 0.76 0.70 0.82 0.87 0.73 0.83 0.82
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-361
ID No. NRH‐23c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.06 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.35 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.74 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.88 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.20 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.40 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.06 Jan 1.12
2015 1.35 Feb 1.17
2020 1.74 Mar 1.21
2030 1.88 Apr 1.00
2040 2.03 May 1.01
2050 2.20 Jun 0.92
2060 2.40 Jul 0.84
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.96
Oct 0.90
Nov 0.92
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on (a) LWSP projected water use and (b) historic ratio of WWTP flows to WTP flows
(using 2010‐2012 average to determine ratio).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-362
ID No. NWH‐24a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Thomasville Type Withdrawal
Facility City of Thomasville WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.22 3.15 2.97 3.13 3.37 3.31 3.31 3.35 3.24 3.17 2.83 2.84 3.16
2002 2.53 2.36 2.35 2.77 3.00 3.15 2.72 2.85 2.63 2.54 2.33 2.34 2.63
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.77 2.72 2.77 2.81 3.37 3.28 3.26 3.47 3.14 2.95 2.65 2.55 2.98
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 2.41 2.49 2.63 2.24 2.59 2.66 2.51 2.68 2.69 2.55 2.52 2.47 2.54
2010 2.62 2.52 2.56 2.70 2.72 2.67 2.75 2.58 2.86 3.21 3.30 2.47 2.75
2011 2.35 2.15 2.08 2.02 2.02 3.16 2.79 2.73 2.45 2.47 2.40 2.38 2.42
2012 2.35 2.33 2.32 2.41 2.66 2.73 2.78 2.56 2.38 2.37 2.25 2.29 2.45
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-363
ID No. NWH‐24a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.54 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.55 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.58 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.71 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.86 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.94 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.02 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.54 Jan 0.95
2015 2.55 Feb 0.93
2020 2.58 Mar 0.94
2030 2.71 Apr 0.93
2040 2.86 May 1.02
2050 2.94 Jun 1.10
2060 3.02 Jul 1.07
Aug 1.07
Sep 1.03
Oct 1.03
Nov 1.00
Dec 0.93
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections were developed from the LWSP.
Projections for 2020‐2060 are directly from the LWSP; 2015 data was interpolated
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-364
ID No. NRH‐24b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Thomasville Type Return
Facility Hamby Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.71 3.60 3.67 3.64 3.14 2.74 2.68 2.42 2.51 2.60 2.65 2.91 3.02
2002 2.80 2.58 3.00 2.57 2.31 2.14 2.29 2.45 2.91 3.16 3.45 3.12 2.73
2003 2.81 2.87 4.12 3.92 3.55 3.44 3.04 3.34 3.01 2.37 2.29 2.29 3.09
2004 2.19 2.53 2.64 2.50 2.34 2.35 2.47 2.46 2.63 2.45 2.48 2.50 2.46
2005 2.42 2.48 2.60 2.99 2.95 3.00 2.87 2.64 2.20 2.47 2.60 3.30 2.71
2006 3.17 3.04 2.76 2.78 2.52 2.73 2.60 2.47 2.91 2.69 2.86 2.37 2.74
2007 3.48 3.11 2.89 2.95 2.39 2.66 2.53 2.25 2.07 2.55 2.36 2.59 2.65
2008 2.72 3.01 3.45 2.96 2.82 1.81 1.86 2.10 2.45 2.08 2.02 2.56 2.49
2009 2.50 2.24 3.77 2.61 2.15 2.22 1.71 1.84 1.98 1.97 2.91 3.21 2.43
2010 2.91 3.98 2.93 2.56 2.41 2.17 2.17 2.39 2.19 2.17 1.91 1.92 2.47
2011 2.04 2.18 2.46 2.49 2.30 1.89 2.03 1.81 2.10 2.14 2.67 2.75 2.24
2012 2.34 2.39 2.47 2.09 2.20 2.01 2.04 2.22 2.13 2.07 1.64 1.81 2.12
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-365
ID No. NRH‐24b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.29 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.31 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.43 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.56 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.63 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.70 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.27 Jan 1.11
2015 2.29 Feb 1.18
2020 2.31 Mar 1.25
2030 2.43 Apr 1.09
2040 2.56 May 0.99
2050 2.63 Jun 0.89
2060 2.70 Jul 0.86
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.90
Oct 0.90
Nov 0.94
Dec 1.03
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on (a) LWSP projected water use and (b) historic ratio of WWTP flows to WTP flows
(using 2010‐2012 average to determine ratio).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-366
ID No. NRH‐25a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Return
Facility Archie Elledge WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 21.37 22.72 22.33 23.33 21.05 20.95 20.27 20.80 20.96 20.39 19.97 18.98 21.08
2002 18.19 18.23 17.79 18.05 17.79 18.16 17.22 18.08 18.71 19.98 19.73 19.40 18.44
2003 17.92 19.78 22.01 22.19 20.34 21.65 21.30 20.92 19.54 18.11 17.12 17.79 19.89
2004 16.70 18.44 18.32 17.93 17.64 17.52 16.79 18.67 21.20 18.22 18.58 19.12 18.25
2005 17.87 18.16 18.89 18.54 17.72 18.18 17.72 18.33 17.66 18.05 17.26 18.42 18.07
2006 17.37 16.93 16.90 17.30 16.97 17.75 18.25 18.77 19.93 18.50 19.88 17.37 17.99
2007 20.44 18.40 19.89 19.11 17.95 18.70 17.20 17.22 16.72 17.75 15.93 16.24 17.96
2008 16.58 17.38 17.08 18.61 17.55 15.89 15.91 16.78 17.81 16.55 16.77 17.40 17.02
2009 17.95 16.60 18.69 17.24 17.00 17.95 16.01 16.25 16.15 16.30 20.85 20.45 17.62
2010 18.88 20.52 19.69 18.33 17.61 17.93 17.14 17.70 16.85 16.68 15.60 14.79 17.62
2011 14.89 14.98 15.56 14.62 14.58 15.06 17.28 16.67 16.93 15.29 16.36 15.80 15.67
2012 15.45 15.41 15.89 14.17 15.62 13.75 13.65 14.78 16.30 15.18 13.88 13.89 14.83
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-367
ID No. NRH‐25a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 16.04 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 17.37 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 19.05 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 21.37 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 22.30 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 23.56 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 25.13 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 16.04 Jan 1.03
2015 17.37 Feb 1.03
2020 19.05 Mar 1.06
2030 21.37 Apr 1.01
2040 22.30 May 1.00
2050 23.56 Jun 0.99
2060 25.13 Jul 0.96
Aug 0.99
Sep 1.00
Oct 0.97
Nov 0.99
Dec 0.98
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on (a) LWSP projected water use and (b) historic ratio of WWTP flows to WTP flows
(using 2010‐2012 average to determine ratio).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-368
ID No. NRH‐25b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Return
Facility Muddy Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 13.41 14.43 14.51 14.46 13.70 13.09 12.47 12.77 12.50 12.07 11.91 12.16 13.11
2002 15.19 13.85 14.05 13.68 13.21 13.10 13.96 13.99 14.55 15.56 16.99 16.97 14.60
2003 15.80 18.25 27.22 27.81 22.49 22.99 25.93 18.08 18.45 15.78 15.53 16.38 20.40
2004 15.44 19.73 16.24 16.64 15.49 15.46 15.18 15.14 23.19 15.39 16.25 16.54 16.70
2005 16.04 16.39 19.54 16.88 15.38 15.16 16.28 15.94 14.00 15.86 15.61 17.60 16.23
2006 18.24 16.55 15.46 14.74 14.60 15.15 17.64 13.77 16.63 14.44 19.52 14.45 15.92
2007 23.38 14.93 19.45 17.04 14.22 14.29 13.74 13.57 13.23 13.99 13.63 14.30 15.49
2008 14.20 15.13 14.84 16.61 15.62 13.19 12.91 13.30 13.98 13.63 13.83 15.12 14.36
2009 15.30 14.17 16.39 15.77 14.97 15.57 12.59 13.10 13.30 13.38 16.58 17.88 14.92
2010 22.16 19.57 16.96 15.81 14.48 14.53 13.27 14.27 13.35 15.91 15.30 15.69 15.92
2011 15.47 15.55 17.72 16.81 16.20 14.02 13.08 12.36 13.82 14.58 15.82 15.85 15.10
2012 15.17 15.14 16.19 15.81 18.44 15.22 14.50 15.36 14.33 14.81 14.25 14.84 15.34
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-369
ID No. NRH‐25b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 15.46 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 15.46 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 16.96 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 19.02 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 19.85 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 20.98 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 22.38 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 15.46 Jan 1.16
2015 15.46 Feb 1.04
2020 16.96 Mar 1.11
2030 19.02 Apr 1.07
2040 19.85 May 1.03
2050 20.98 Jun 0.95
2060 22.38 Jul 0.88
Aug 0.90
Sep 0.90
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.98
Dec 1.03
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on (a) LWSP projected water use and (b) historic ratio of WWTP flows to WTP flows
(using 2010‐2012 average to determine ratio).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-370
ID No. NRH‐25c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Return
Facility P. W. Swann WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.76 0.42 0.52 0.53 0.39 0.41 0.51
2005 0.37 0.41 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.66 0.46 1.56 1.08 0.39 0.37 0.63
2006 0.37 0.46 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.49 0.41 0.38 0.43 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.41
2007 0.35 0.46 0.55 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.38 0.40 0.46 0.37 0.39 0.35 0.40
2008 0.37 0.39 0.50 0.38 0.56 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.42 0.54 0.46 0.40 0.43
2009 0.45 0.35 0.36 0.33 0.37 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.48 0.53 0.38 0.50 0.41
2010 0.58 0.58 0.50 0.42 0.41 0.50 0.30 0.44 0.50 0.52 0.40 0.47 0.47
2011 0.43 0.59 0.49 0.55 0.40 0.38 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.52 0.44 0.44
2012 0.37 0.39 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.34 0.41 0.38 0.57 0.39 0.38 0.31 0.38
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-371
ID No. NRH‐25c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.56 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.59 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.62 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.66 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.43 Jan 1.00
2015 0.46 Feb 1.08
2020 0.50 Mar 1.09
2030 0.56 Apr 0.95
2040 0.59 May 0.98
2050 0.62 Jun 0.95
2060 0.66 Jul 0.91
Aug 0.93
Sep 1.10
Oct 1.06
Nov 1.00
Dec 0.97
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-372
ID No. NRH‐25d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Return
Facility R. A. Thomas WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.90 ND 0.56 1.08 0.56 0.81 0.67 0.72 1.11 0.76 0.61 0.63 0.76
2002 0.55 0.77 0.39 0.71 0.83 1.10 1.09 0.99 0.87 0.84 0.61 0.62 0.78
2003 0.82 0.53 1.08 0.92 0.85 0.89 0.78 0.90 0.80 0.74 0.84 ND 0.83
2004 0.77 0.80 0.68 0.67 0.74 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.46 0.36 0.45 0.45 0.62
2005 0.58 0.57 0.43 0.46 0.92 0.66 0.69 0.66 0.68 0.68 0.76 0.92 0.67
2006 0.94 0.95 0.87 1.24 0.85 0.86 0.76 0.72 0.87 0.93 0.91 0.96 0.90
2007 0.95 0.91 0.81 0.77 0.65 0.69 0.58 0.60 0.58 0.64 0.63 0.78 0.71
2008 0.63 0.64 0.62 0.72 0.58 0.72 0.79 0.70 0.53 0.23 ND ND 0.62
2009 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2011 ND ND ND ND ND 1.36 1.42 3.56 3.04 0.31 0.42 0.51 1.52
2012 0.37 0.32 0.33 0.26 0.29 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.30 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.28
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
H-373
ID No. NRH‐25d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.89 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.95 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.04 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.17 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.22 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.29 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.37 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.89 Jan 1.21
2015 0.95 Feb 1.16
2020 1.04 Mar 1.10
2030 1.17 Apr 1.09
2040 1.22 May 0.95
2050 1.29 Jun 1.03
2060 1.37 Jul 1.01
Aug 0.94
Sep 0.88
Oct 0.72
Nov 0.82
Dec 0.95
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐25e Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Withdrawal
Facility P. W. Swann WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 11.86 11.96 11.87 12.62 13.66 14.06 14.33 14.59 14.94 13.31 12.42 11.84 13.13
2002 11.87 12.36 12.11 14.02 15.37 16.00 15.43 15.83 13.91 12.92 11.92 11.95 13.65
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 10.41 10.83 10.83 11.39 13.74 13.15 12.42 14.53 13.86 12.56 11.09 10.36 12.10
2008 10.59 10.44 10.36 11.00 11.59 14.15 13.30 12.80 11.62 10.86 10.39 9.77 11.41
2009 10.41 10.00 10.06 10.59 10.36 12.03 12.59 12.89 11.80 10.83 10.44 9.94 11.00
2010 10.65 10.39 10.09 10.97 11.41 12.71 13.12 12.18 12.97 11.44 8.18 10.09 11.19
2011 10.12 9.97 9.86 10.00 11.06 13.53 12.53 13.56 12.62 11.59 10.44 10.00 11.28
2012 9.94 9.89 10.24 10.59 11.24 12.65 13.18 12.62 11.65 11.03 10.62 9.77 11.12
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
Prior to 2010, the P. W. Swann WTP was known as the Northwest WTP.
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Winston‐Salem facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐25e
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.20 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.89 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 13.04 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 14.62 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 15.26 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 16.13 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 17.20 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 11.20 Jan 0.91
2015 11.89 Feb 0.90
2020 13.04 Mar 0.90
2030 14.62 Apr 0.95
2040 15.26 May 1.02
2050 16.13 Jun 1.15
2060 17.20 Jul 1.13
Aug 1.15
Sep 1.09
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.90
Dec 0.88
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐25f Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Winston‐Salem Type Withdrawal
Facility R. W. Neilson WTP / R. A. Thomas WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 28.45 28.70 28.49 30.28 32.76 33.73 34.38 34.99 35.85 31.92 29.80 28.41 31.49
2002 28.47 29.64 29.04 33.62 36.88 38.39 37.01 37.97 33.36 31.01 28.59 28.68 32.74
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 24.99 25.97 25.97 27.31 32.96 31.55 29.78 34.87 33.24 30.14 26.61 24.84 29.04
2008 25.41 25.06 24.84 26.40 27.81 33.95 31.90 30.70 27.88 26.04 24.91 23.43 27.36
2009 24.99 24.00 24.14 25.41 24.84 28.87 30.21 30.91 28.30 25.97 25.06 23.86 26.39
2010 25.55 24.91 24.21 26.33 27.39 30.49 31.48 29.22 31.13 27.46 19.62 24.21 26.85
2011 24.28 23.93 23.64 24.00 26.54 32.47 30.07 32.54 30.28 27.81 25.06 24.00 27.07
2012 23.86 23.71 24.56 25.41 26.96 30.35 31.62 30.28 27.95 26.47 25.48 23.43 26.68
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
The flows for R. A. Thomas WTP are included in the historical data shown above.
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Winston‐Salem facilities.
backwash waste flow discharged from this WTP.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
The R. W. Neilson WTP recycles its decanted lagoon effluent back to the headwaters of the plant, therefore there is no
ID No. NWH‐25f
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 26.87 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 28.52 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 31.28 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 35.08 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 36.62 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 38.69 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 41.27 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 26.87 Jan 0.91
2015 28.52 Feb 0.90
2020 31.28 Mar 0.90
2030 35.08 Apr 0.95
2040 36.62 May 1.02
2050 38.69 Jun 1.15
2060 41.27 Jul 1.13
Aug 1.15
Sep 1.09
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.90
Dec 0.88
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projected Flowrates shown above are based on (a) Local Water Supply Plan projected flowrates for
the entire entity and (b) historical flow splits among the entity's facilities, based on 2012 flow data.
Projected flowrate for 2015 is interpolated between Base value and 2020 value from LWSP.
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐27a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davidson Water Inc Type Withdrawal
Facility C. O. Pickle WP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 8.29 7.97 8.05 8.14 9.31 9.89 10.51 10.65 10.02 9.47 9.45 8.71 9.21
2002 8.71 8.34 8.55 10.37 11.71 12.92 11.21 11.00 9.78 9.70 9.35 9.38 10.09
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 10.06 10.40 10.45 11.21 13.96 12.84 12.67 14.81 13.69 10.19 10.77 10.19 11.78
2008 10.12 9.72 9.78 10.13 11.92 15.36 12.97 12.73 11.81 11.29 10.08 9.58 11.29
2009 9.97 9.83 9.70 10.13 12.20 11.99 12.18 11.43 11.09 10.65 10.39 10.41 10.84
2010 11.07 10.99 10.10 11.25 12.32 12.80 13.22 11.84 12.41 10.92 9.97 8.92 11.32
2011 9.74 9.30 9.54 9.44 10.39 12.63 11.90 11.25 10.48 9.27 9.39 9.07 10.20
2012 9.02 8.74 9.43 9.83 10.74 11.62 11.63 10.30 10.21 9.45 9.34 8.79 9.93
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐27a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.48 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.56 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.69 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 10.96 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.24 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.53 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.82 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Davidson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 10.48 Jan 0.92
2015 10.56 Feb 0.90
2020 10.69 Mar 0.90
2030 10.96 Apr 0.95
2040 11.24 May 1.09
2050 11.53 Jun 1.18
2060 11.82 Jul 1.14
Aug 1.11
Sep 1.07
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.92
Dec 0.87
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐27b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davidson Water Inc Type Return
Facility Davidson Water WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21
2002 0.26 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28
2003 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2004 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2005 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2006 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2007 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2008 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2009 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
2010 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.28
2011 0.40 0.35 0.44 0.37 0.47 0.54 0.50 0.48 0.42 0.38 0.40 0.37 0.43
2012 0.41 0.34 0.46 0.55 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.34 0.40 0.34 0.40 0.33 0.40
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐27b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.39 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.41 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.42 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.37 Jan 1.00
2015 0.38 Feb 0.93
2020 0.38 Mar 1.03
2030 0.39 Apr 1.05
2040 0.40 May 1.04
2050 0.41 Jun 1.06
2060 0.42 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.00
Sep 0.99
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.98
Dec 0.94
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of (WTP return) to (WTP use) from 2010‐2012
multiplied by the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐28a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davie County Type Withdrawal
Facility Cooleemee WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.77 0.72 0.73 0.76 0.92 0.92 1.04 1.06 0.99 0.88 0.76 0.73 0.86
2002 0.98 0.91 0.92 1.18 1.38 1.51 1.43 1.42 1.18 1.00 0.93 0.87 1.14
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.97 0.92 0.98 1.10 1.43 1.41 1.31 1.75 1.61 1.35 1.12 1.00 1.25
2008 0.88 0.80 0.88 0.90 1.15 1.50 1.24 1.19 1.05 0.97 0.90 0.86 1.03
2009 1.10 1.07 1.02 1.09 1.09 1.32 1.44 1.40 1.25 1.10 0.99 1.04 1.16
2010 0.96 0.92 0.89 1.01 1.12 1.22 1.30 1.20 1.29 1.17 1.01 1.01 1.09
2011 0.97 0.92 0.93 0.96 1.06 1.41 1.38 1.38 1.25 1.16 0.99 0.95 1.11
2012 0.94 0.90 0.94 1.08 1.14 1.34 1.52 1.50 1.15 1.26 1.12 0.99 1.16
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
Bear Creek WWTP (see entity sheet NWH‐65a) was replaced with a pump station to Cooleemee WWTP in 2008.
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all Davie County facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐28a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.12 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.13 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.15 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.18 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.22 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.25 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.29 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.12 Jan 0.86
2015 1.13 Feb 0.81
2020 1.15 Mar 0.83
2030 1.18 Apr 0.90
2040 1.22 May 1.03
2050 1.25 Jun 1.21
2060 1.29 Jul 1.20
Aug 1.24
Sep 1.12
Oct 1.03
Nov 0.90
Dec 0.86
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐28b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davie County Type Withdrawal
Facility Sparks Road WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.08 1.01 1.02 1.07 1.28 1.29 1.45 1.49 1.39 1.23 1.07 1.02 1.20
2002 1.37 1.27 1.29 1.65 1.94 2.12 2.01 1.98 1.65 1.40 1.30 1.22 1.60
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.35 1.30 1.37 1.54 2.00 1.98 1.84 2.45 2.26 1.89 1.57 1.40 1.75
2008 1.23 1.12 1.23 1.26 1.62 2.10 1.74 1.67 1.47 1.36 1.26 1.20 1.44
2009 1.55 1.49 1.44 1.52 1.53 1.84 2.02 1.97 1.75 1.54 1.38 1.46 1.63
2010 1.34 1.28 1.24 1.41 1.57 1.71 1.83 1.69 1.80 1.64 1.41 1.41 1.53
2011 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.35 1.49 1.97 1.93 1.93 1.76 1.63 1.39 1.33 1.56
2012 1.32 1.26 1.31 1.51 1.60 1.88 2.12 2.11 1.61 1.77 1.57 1.39 1.62
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all Davie County facilities.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐28b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.57 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.59 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.61 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.66 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.70 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.81 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.57 Jan 0.86
2015 1.59 Feb 0.81
2020 1.61 Mar 0.83
2030 1.66 Apr 0.90
2040 1.70 May 1.03
2050 1.75 Jun 1.21
2060 1.81 Jul 1.20
Aug 1.24
Sep 1.12
Oct 1.03
Nov 0.90
Dec 0.86
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐28c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davie County Type Return
Facility Sparks Road WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.53 0.38 0.45
2004 0.38 0.27 0.19 0.31 0.25 0.41 0.46 0.37 0.42 0.41 0.54 0.40 0.37
2005 0.37 0.41 0.33 0.28 0.30 0.13 0.28 0.43 0.39 0.14 0.12 0.08 0.27
2006 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.18 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.23 0.21 0.14
2007 0.18 0.12 0.10 0.18 0.12 0.18 0.14 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.17 0.16 0.14
2008 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.13
2009 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.22 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.12 0.19 0.25 0.16
2010 0.16 0.07 0.13 0.19 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.16 0.20 0.17
2011 0.15 0.15 1.05 1.02 1.05 1.40 1.53 1.55 1.54 1.31 1.16 1.06 1.09
2012 ND ND 1.00 1.20 1.57 1.56 1.71 1.89 1.46 1.75 1.44 1.23 1.48
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐28c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.92 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.95 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.98 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.01 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.04 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.91 Jan 0.42
2015 0.91 Feb 0.33
2020 0.92 Mar 0.88
2030 0.95 Apr 0.97
2040 0.98 May 0.92
2050 1.01 Jun 1.24
2060 1.04 Jul 1.29
Aug 1.31
Sep 1.31
Oct 1.15
Nov 1.08
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐28d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Davie County Type Return
Facility Cooleemee WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.97 1.02 1.08 1.10 0.85 0.88 0.81 0.73 0.90 0.73 0.68 0.75 0.87
2002 0.60 0.50 0.61 0.69 0.99 0.90 0.91 0.74 0.39 0.35 0.40 0.34 0.62
2003 0.32 0.41 0.51 0.59 0.51 0.56 0.51 0.66 0.45 0.41 0.43 0.36 0.48
2004 0.36 0.63 0.47 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.42 0.48 0.65 0.50 0.48 0.45 0.49
2005 0.47 0.44 0.61 0.50 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.45
2006 0.46 0.40 0.43 0.36 0.38 0.43 0.35 0.38 0.38 0.33 0.43 0.25 0.38
2007 0.60 0.39 0.48 0.40 0.34 0.36 0.28 0.47 0.36 0.43 0.47 0.40 0.42
2008 0.50 0.49 0.38 0.48 0.38 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.63 0.54 0.53 0.63 0.47
2009 0.65 0.54 0.58 0.45 0.92 0.44 0.27 0.37 0.44 0.43 0.69 0.80 0.55
2010 0.84 1.36 0.61 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.51 0.42 0.52 0.65 0.90 0.63
2011 ND 0.57 0.72 0.49 0.49 0.43 0.51 0.51 0.46 0.50 0.60 0.55 0.53
2012 0.54 0.54 0.57 0.45 0.67 0.49 0.62 0.55 0.47 0.50 0.53 ND 0.54
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐28d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.57 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.57 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.58 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.60 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.61 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.63 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.65 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.57 Jan 1.20
2015 0.57 Feb 1.24
2020 0.58 Mar 1.06
2030 0.60 Apr 0.87
2040 0.61 May 1.04
2050 0.63 Jun 0.81
2060 0.65 Jul 0.79
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.89
Oct 0.93
Nov 1.10
Dec 1.26
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRL‐34 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Greater Badin Water & Sewer District Type Return
Facility Badin WWTP Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.53 0.64 0.54 0.57 0.45 0.22 0.49 0.16 0.25 0.31 0.52 0.62 0.44
2002 0.60 0.44 0.55 0.35 0.27 0.20 0.19 0.25 0.27 0.57 0.69 0.88 0.44
2003 0.48 0.80 1.09 0.91 0.90 0.83 0.61 0.84 0.39 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.63
2004 0.23 0.62 0.44 0.27 0.36 0.28 0.25 0.33 0.66 0.34 0.38 0.39 0.38
2005 0.42 0.50 0.81 0.63 0.31 0.40 0.45 0.43 0.26 0.31 0.25 0.64 0.45
2006 0.39 0.19 0.24 0.42 0.31 0.44 0.34 0.37 0.48 0.36 0.90 0.61 0.42
2007 0.78 0.55 0.47 0.27 0.14 0.17 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.26 0.26
2008 0.32 0.34 0.49 0.50 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.12 0.21 0.14 0.16 0.49 0.26
2009 0.28 0.23 0.72 0.25 0.21 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.62 0.76 0.31
2010 0.73 0.82 0.48 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.10 0.23 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.30
2011 0.24 0.33 0.42 0.25 0.20 0.25 0.28 0.27 0.22 0.33 0.40 0.39 0.30
2012 0.44 0.39 0.39 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.19 0.27 0.27 0.24 0.17 0.21 0.26
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRL‐34
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.29 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.29 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.30 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.31 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.32 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.33 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.35 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.34%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.39%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Stanly County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.29 Jan 1.63
2015 0.29 Feb 1.57
2020 0.30 Mar 1.74
2030 0.31 Apr 0.99
2040 0.32 May 0.70
2050 0.33 Jun 0.67
2060 0.35 Jul 0.54
Aug 0.64
Sep 0.64
Oct 0.63
Nov 0.93
Dec 1.34
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWL‐42 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Montgomery County Type Withdrawal
Facility Montgomery County WTP Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.32 2.36 2.34 2.49 2.54 2.63 2.65 2.64 2.66 2.64 2.81 2.12 2.52
2002 3.19 3.60 2.58 2.65 2.77 2.98 3.66 3.72 3.23 2.93 2.84 3.10 3.10
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.56 2.74 3.10 3.32 3.61 3.65 3.92 4.14 3.88 3.75 3.73 3.70 3.51
2008 3.82 3.99 3.91 3.79 3.80 3.94 4.05 3.99 3.73 3.98 3.83 3.61 3.87
2009 2.95 3.14 2.85 2.99 2.83 3.17 3.48 3.37 3.32 2.99 2.42 2.43 2.99
2010 2.45 2.10 2.14 2.29 2.63 2.91 2.76 2.77 2.54 2.11 2.14 2.02 2.41
2011 2.00 1.97 1.99 1.95 2.22 2.37 2.45 2.37 2.11 2.02 2.00 2.00 2.12
2012 2.00 2.00 1.90 2.02 2.23 2.37 2.50 2.40 2.30 2.26 2.11 2.06 2.18
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWL‐42
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.24 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.25 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.28 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.34 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.40 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.46 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.52 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Montgomery County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.24 Jan 0.92
2015 2.25 Feb 0.93
2020 2.28 Mar 0.93
2030 2.34 Apr 0.96
2040 2.40 May 1.01
2050 2.46 Jun 1.08
2060 2.52 Jul 1.12
Aug 1.11
Sep 1.05
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.95
Dec 0.93
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐52 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Stanly County Type Return
Facility West Stanly WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.48 0.48 0.40 0.48 0.34 0.42 0.40 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.46 0.50 0.42
2002 0.32 0.24 0.33 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.27
2003 0.27 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.44 0.48 0.34 0.25 0.20 0.24 0.22 0.31 0.35
2004 0.22 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.22 0.27 0.25 0.32 0.44 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.30
2005 0.34 0.46 0.49 0.44 0.30 0.47 0.43 0.25 0.23 0.30 0.28 0.47 0.37
2006 0.42 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.27 0.29 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.34 0.47 0.37 0.33
2007 0.47 0.42 0.36 0.32 0.24 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.23 0.27 0.23 0.33 0.30
2008 0.32 0.40 0.43 0.46 0.31 0.25 0.29 0.35 0.42 0.31 0.35 0.46 0.36
2009 0.42 0.39 0.65 0.38 0.39 0.31 0.33 0.28 0.25 0.29 0.49 0.58 0.40
2010 0.55 0.54 0.48 0.29 0.33 0.36 0.31 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.38
2011 0.36 0.46 0.56 0.39 0.41 0.34 0.30 0.34 0.34 0.42 0.40 0.41 0.39
2012 0.54 0.39 0.40 0.33 0.35 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.37 0.29 0.37 0.37
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐52
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.39 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.41 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.42 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.44 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.34%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.39%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Stanly County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.38 Jan 1.21
2015 0.38 Feb 1.18
2020 0.39 Mar 1.31
2030 0.41 Apr 0.99
2040 0.42 May 0.93
2050 0.44 Jun 0.82
2060 0.46 Jul 0.82
Aug 0.86
Sep 0.90
Oct 0.91
Nov 0.95
Dec 1.13
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐58 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Bermuda Run Type Return
Facility Bermuda Run WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.12
2002 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.13
2003 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.18 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.15
2004 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.11
2005 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.12
2006 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.13
2007 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.11
2008 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.13
2009 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.18 0.13
2010 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.13
2011 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.13
2012 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.11
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐58
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.13 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.13 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.13 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.14 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.14 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.12 Jan 1.11
2015 0.12 Feb 1.03
2020 0.13 Mar 1.09
2030 0.13 Apr 1.06
2040 0.13 May 1.03
2050 0.14 Jun 0.99
2060 0.14 Jul 0.91
Aug 0.91
Sep 0.89
Oct 0.91
Nov 0.97
Dec 1.11
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐59 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Biscoe Type Return
Facility Biscoe WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.33 0.35 0.37 0.34 0.33 0.18 0.21 0.13 0.15 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.25
2002 0.31 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.28 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.26
2003 0.23 0.30 0.43 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.34 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.34 0.34
2004 0.30 0.43 0.34 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.37
2005 0.39 0.46 0.45 0.34 0.24 0.29 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.27 0.16 0.24 0.30
2006 0.24 0.17 0.18 0.31 0.18 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.26 0.22 0.20
2007 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.18
2008 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.23 0.17 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.19 0.20
2009 0.19 0.16 0.29 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.24 0.29 0.19
2010 0.24 0.32 0.28 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.22
2011 0.17 0.20 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
2012 0.22 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.20
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐59
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Montgomery County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.21 Jan 1.07
2015 0.21 Feb 1.15
2020 0.21 Mar 1.25
2030 0.21 Apr 1.06
2040 0.22 May 0.98
2050 0.23 Jun 0.88
2060 0.23 Jul 0.83
Aug 0.93
Sep 0.95
Oct 0.90
Nov 0.96
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐60 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Boonville Type Return
Facility Boonville WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.46 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.13
2002 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.10
2003 0.10 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12
2004 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11
2005 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.08
2006 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.06
2007 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.11
2008 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.14
2009 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.14
2010 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.17 0.14 0.09 0.11 0.12
2011 0.10 0.11 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11
2012 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.11
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐60
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.13 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Yadkin County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.11 Jan 0.90
2015 0.11 Feb 0.91
2020 0.12 Mar 1.04
2030 0.12 Apr 1.03
2040 0.12 May 1.07
2050 0.12 Jun 1.04
2060 0.13 Jul 0.93
Aug 0.85
Sep 1.09
Oct 1.07
Nov 0.99
Dec 1.09
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWT‐61a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Denton Type Withdrawal
Facility Denton WP Sub‐basin Tuckertown Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.78 0.78 0.81 0.87 0.93 0.96 0.97 0.92 0.93 0.86 0.81 0.74 0.86
2002 1.25 1.24 1.31 1.37 1.42 1.59 1.49 1.42 1.40 1.39 1.33 1.35 1.38
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.23 1.30 1.19 1.23 1.47 1.62 1.60 1.66 1.42 1.29 1.18 1.19 1.36
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 1.15 1.24 1.14 1.19 1.43 1.67 1.52 1.41 1.30 1.23 1.22 1.27 1.31
2010 1.25 1.19 1.12 1.21 1.24 1.39 1.49 1.45 1.43 1.18 1.16 1.23 1.28
2011 1.24 1.15 1.03 1.16 1.24 1.36 1.42 1.30 1.21 1.17 1.06 1.02 1.20
2012 1.03 1.00 0.98 1.17 1.19 1.34 1.49 1.40 1.33 1.23 1.18 1.14 1.21
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWT‐61a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.24 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.25 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.32 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.35 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.38 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Davidson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.23 Jan 0.93
2015 1.24 Feb 0.92
2020 1.25 Mar 0.86
2030 1.28 Apr 0.94
2040 1.32 May 1.03
2050 1.35 Jun 1.16
2060 1.38 Jul 1.18
Aug 1.14
Sep 1.05
Oct 0.96
Nov 0.91
Dec 0.92
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRT‐61b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Denton Type Return
Facility Denton WWTP Sub‐basin Tuckertown Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.41 0.47 0.45 0.40 0.28 0.25 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.39 0.34 0.34
2002 0.53 0.43 0.48 0.34 0.30 0.27 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.39
2003 0.31 0.48 0.57 0.49 0.47 0.36 0.27 0.31 0.28 0.22 0.21 0.30 0.36
2004 0.27 0.44 0.31 0.25 0.19 0.33 0.26 0.29 0.39 0.26 0.36 0.36 0.31
2005 0.35 0.41 0.53 0.39 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.28 0.44 0.32
2006 0.37 0.32 0.34 0.34 0.26 0.34 0.23 0.27 0.33 0.32 0.53 0.43 0.34
2007 0.52 0.47 0.41 0.39 0.29 0.32 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.33 0.29 0.39 0.35
2008 0.35 0.41 0.46 0.52 0.38 0.28 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.30 0.36 0.51 0.39
2009 0.44 0.42 0.70 0.46 0.36 0.47 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.53 0.66 0.44
2010 0.55 0.65 0.53 0.36 0.39 0.32 0.29 0.35 0.34 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.40
2011 0.40 0.44 0.51 0.38 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.32 0.40 0.42 0.46 0.52 0.41
2012 0.47 0.46 0.49 0.35 0.41 0.41 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.38 0.35 0.40 0.40
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRT‐61b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.41 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.42 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.44 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Davidson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.40 Jan 1.15
2015 0.40 Feb 1.20
2020 0.41 Mar 1.30
2030 0.42 Apr 1.03
2040 0.43 May 0.92
2050 0.44 Jun 0.90
2060 0.45 Jul 0.78
Aug 0.83
Sep 0.88
Oct 0.86
Nov 0.97
Dec 1.19
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐62 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Dobson Type Return
Facility Dobson WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.22 0.17
2002 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.27 0.21
2003 0.24 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.22 0.22
2004 0.19 0.26 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.24 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20
2005 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.19
2006 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.17
2007 0.24 0.19 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.15 0.17 0.18
2008 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.19
2009 0.19 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.21 0.23 0.19
2010 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18
2011 0.13 0.16 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.17
2012 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐62
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.18 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.18 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.18 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.18 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.19 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.19 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.18 Jan 1.07
2015 0.18 Feb 1.04
2020 0.18 Mar 1.15
2030 0.18 Apr 1.07
2040 0.19 May 1.04
2050 0.19 Jun 0.94
2060 0.20 Jul 0.88
Aug 0.92
Sep 0.97
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.96
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐63 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Elkin Type Withdrawal
Facility Elkin Municipal WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.39 1.35 1.35 1.43 1.45 1.43 1.44 1.43 1.46 1.44 1.42 1.50 1.42
2002 1.32 1.17 1.23 1.21 1.18 1.18 1.08 1.05 1.02 1.06 1.02 1.01 1.13
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.85 0.95 0.87 0.87 1.43 1.06 0.87 0.81 0.82 0.93
2008 0.84 0.87 0.83 0.81 0.87 0.97 0.86 0.92 0.83 0.83 0.85 0.90 0.87
2009 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.82 0.80 0.87 0.76 0.80 0.83 0.73 0.81 0.92 0.81
2010 0.77 0.74 0.75 0.72 0.78 0.75 0.74 0.72 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.83 0.74
2011 0.72 0.68 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.65 0.63 0.68 0.68
2012 0.65 0.65 0.67 0.64 0.68 0.69 0.74 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.69
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐63
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.70 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.71 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.72 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.73 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.75 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.77 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.79 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.70 Jan 0.99
2015 0.71 Feb 0.96
2020 0.72 Mar 0.97
2030 0.73 Apr 0.96
2040 0.75 May 1.01
2050 0.77 Jun 1.03
2060 0.79 Jul 0.99
Aug 1.12
Sep 1.02
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.95
Dec 1.03
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐64 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Jonesville Type Withdrawal
Facility Jonesville WP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31
2002 0.31 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.33
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.36 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.34 0.37
2008 0.36 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.41 0.40 0.43 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.36 0.38
2009 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.36
2010 0.36 0.33 0.28 0.29 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.44 0.52 0.71 0.49 0.34 0.40
2011 0.37 0.36 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.30 0.29 0.41 0.52 0.33 0.29 0.31 0.36
2012 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.34 0.32 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.31 0.30 0.30
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐64
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.36 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.36 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.36 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.37 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.39 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Yadkin County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.36 Jan 0.95
2015 0.36 Feb 0.91
2020 0.36 Mar 0.92
2030 0.37 Apr 0.92
2040 0.38 May 0.98
2050 0.39 Jun 0.99
2060 0.40 Jul 0.98
Aug 1.10
Sep 1.15
Oct 1.14
Nov 1.03
Dec 0.93
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐65a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Mocksville Type Withdrawal
Facility Hugh A. Lagle WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.68 0.65 0.63 0.69 0.85 0.87 0.91 0.86 0.77 0.75 0.66 0.71 0.75
2002 0.72 0.74 0.72 0.80 0.86 0.88 0.81 0.78 0.71 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.75
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.87 0.84 0.83 0.80 0.92 0.89 0.92 1.05 0.98 0.90 0.91 0.88 0.90
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2010 0.87 0.80 0.77 0.85 0.88 0.95 0.96 0.90 0.87 0.89 0.82 0.90 0.87
2011 0.83 0.82 0.81 0.83 0.86 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.79 0.76 0.84
2012 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐65a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.86 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.86 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.88 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.90 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.93 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.96 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.98 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.86 Jan 0.98
2015 0.86 Feb 0.94
2020 0.88 Mar 0.92
2030 0.90 Apr 0.95
2040 0.93 May 1.02
2050 0.96 Jun 1.06
2060 0.98 Jul 1.07
Aug 1.09
Sep 1.03
Oct 0.99
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.97
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐2012 data not available, so 2011 was used as base year.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐65b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Mocksville Type Return
Facility Bear Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.10 0.11 0.17 0.29 ND 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.23 0.18 0.17
2002 0.16 0.17 0.22 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.20 0.21 0.26 0.18
2003 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.28 ND 0.34 0.29 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.25
2004 0.17 0.24 0.19 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.20 0.18 0.27 0.21 0.25 0.25 0.20
2005 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.22 0.21
2006 0.21 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.20 0.17 0.17
2007 0.21 0.18 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.18
2008 0.20 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.21 0.18 ND ND ND 0.21
2009 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2011 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2012 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
Bear Creek WWTP was replaced with a pump station to Cooleemee WWTP (see entity sheet NWH‐28a) and is now inactive.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐65b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 0.93
2015 ‐‐ Feb 0.99
2020 ‐‐ Mar 1.10
2030 ‐‐ Apr 1.07
2040 ‐‐ May 0.85
2050 ‐‐ Jun 1.01
2060 ‐‐ Jul 1.00
Aug 0.96
Sep 0.97
Oct 0.94
Nov 1.05
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐65c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Mocksville Type Return
Facility Dutchman Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.35 0.36 0.46 0.48 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.38 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.40
2002 0.53 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.48 0.65 0.64 0.51
2003 0.47 0.61 0.73 0.65 ND 0.57 0.55 0.59 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.50 0.56
2004 0.46 0.54 0.52 0.55 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.49 0.68 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.54
2005 0.54 0.59 0.63 0.54 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.51 0.51 0.66 0.54
2006 0.67 0.56 0.52 0.53 0.49 0.51 0.49 0.52 0.56 0.52 0.62 0.55 0.55
2007 0.61 0.58 0.62 0.53 0.50 0.52 0.49 0.47 0.48 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.53
2008 0.53 0.58 0.58 0.65 0.52 0.49 0.49 0.56 0.53 0.47 0.44 0.54 0.53
2009 0.50 0.44 0.62 0.51 0.43 0.56 0.39 0.39 0.44 0.50 0.68 0.70 0.52
2010 0.61 0.71 0.54 0.45 0.42 0.45 0.65 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.44 0.48 0.51
2011 0.45 0.46 0.52 0.44 0.47 0.41 0.40 0.33 0.39 0.36 0.43 0.43 0.42
2012 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.34 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.33 0.32 ND 0.35
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐65c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.44 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.47 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.49 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.30%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.29%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Davie County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.43 Jan 1.09
2015 0.43 Feb 1.10
2020 0.44 Mar 1.14
2030 0.45 Apr 1.02
2040 0.47 May 0.96
2050 0.48 Jun 0.97
2060 0.49 Jul 0.96
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.92
Oct 0.93
Nov 0.98
Dec 1.12
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐66 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Mooresville Type Return
Facility Rocky River WWTP (Town of Mooresville) Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.60 2.96 3.07 3.47 3.11 3.19 3.24 3.10 3.02 2.95 2.56 2.41 2.97
2002 2.32 2.31 2.51 2.61 2.58 2.57 2.49 2.89 2.64 2.34 2.41 2.59 2.52
2003 2.33 2.61 2.87 3.15 3.25 2.92 2.46 2.83 2.64 2.39 2.34 2.44 2.69
2004 2.40 2.68 2.51 2.67 2.58 2.56 2.54 2.59 3.01 2.57 2.69 2.86 2.64
2005 2.70 2.74 2.81 2.64 2.52 2.53 2.68 2.67 2.54 2.87 2.67 2.98 2.70
2006 3.01 2.82 2.76 3.03 3.57 2.94 2.74 3.03 2.93 2.87 3.17 2.84 2.98
2007 3.26 2.88 3.14 3.01 2.87 2.90 2.75 2.73 2.69 2.84 2.64 2.73 2.87
2008 2.92 2.88 2.96 3.06 2.74 2.82 2.97 3.10 3.07 3.01 2.97 3.18 2.97
2009 2.97 2.96 3.51 3.23 3.17 3.19 3.17 3.09 3.04 3.10 3.66 3.62 3.23
2010 3.49 4.19 3.57 3.49 3.55 3.61 3.58 3.72 3.23 3.03 2.89 2.98 3.44
2011 3.11 3.20 3.40 3.32 3.27 3.28 3.33 3.18 3.51 3.22 3.54 3.28 3.30
2012 3.30 3.27 3.43 3.34 3.76 3.58 3.52 3.46 3.39 3.31 3.36 3.34 3.42
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐66
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.39 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.51 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.73 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.63 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.16 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.76 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.21%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.09%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Iredell County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.39 Jan 0.99
2015 3.51 Feb 1.01
2020 3.73 Mar 1.04
2030 4.16 Apr 1.01
2040 4.63 May 1.01
2050 5.16 Jun 1.01
2060 5.76 Jul 1.00
Aug 1.00
Sep 0.98
Oct 0.96
Nov 0.99
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐67 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Mount Gilead Type Return
Facility Mount Gilead WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.60 0.66 0.59 0.50 0.28 0.24 0.29 0.19 0.15 0.26 0.54 0.67 0.41
2002 0.57 0.59 0.61 0.48 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.20 0.25 0.36 0.52 0.56 0.39
2003 0.51 0.66 0.87 0.68 0.52 0.72 0.50 0.58 0.26 0.25 0.19 0.31 0.50
2004 0.23 0.38 0.49 0.48 0.33 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.39 0.30 0.22 0.30 0.30
2005 0.32 0.54 0.87 0.94 0.53 0.42 0.30 0.17 0.09 0.19 0.13 0.50 0.41
2006 0.63 0.58 0.49 0.40 0.25 0.35 0.24 0.13 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.38 0.35
2007 0.64 0.75 0.73 0.56 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.13 0.24 0.19 0.15 0.36
2008 0.25 0.48 0.52 0.46 0.22 0.12 0.21 0.17 0.21 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.26
2009 0.16 0.13 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.14 0.34 0.13
2010 0.32 0.46 0.32 0.17 0.15 0.22 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.21 0.17
2011 0.25 0.25 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.22 0.25 0.31 0.32 0.26
2012 0.39 0.32 0.29 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.21
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐67
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.24 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Montgomery County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.21 Jan 1.46
2015 0.21 Feb 1.73
2020 0.22 Mar 1.72
2030 0.22 Apr 1.35
2040 0.23 May 0.88
2050 0.23 Jun 0.73
2060 0.24 Jul 0.66
Aug 0.63
Sep 0.60
Oct 0.65
Nov 0.66
Dec 0.98
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐68a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of North Wilkesboro Type Withdrawal
Facility North Wilkesboro WP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 2.75 2.67 2.65 2.75 2.88 2.88 3.25 3.28 3.19 3.08 2.84 2.80 2.92
2002 2.55 2.55 2.53 2.67 2.68 3.09 2.87 2.97 2.77 2.58 2.40 2.46 2.68
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 2.75 2.80 2.81 3.05 3.08 3.09 2.99 3.35 3.20 3.02 2.82 2.76 2.98
2008 2.82 2.50 2.37 2.41 2.52 2.98 2.86 2.63 2.52 2.53 2.55 2.34 2.59
2009 2.46 2.35 2.34 2.34 2.42 2.58 2.58 2.59 2.49 2.43 2.28 2.33 2.43
2010 2.50 2.36 2.47 2.34 2.54 2.75 2.82 2.68 2.58 2.56 2.32 2.48 2.53
2011 2.42 2.25 2.39 2.41 2.59 2.81 2.93 2.89 2.50 2.74 2.44 2.48 2.57
2012 2.40 2.46 2.45 2.53 2.70 2.81 2.97 2.90 2.80 2.65 2.77 2.61 2.67
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐68a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.59 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.61 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Wilkes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.59 Jan 0.97
2015 2.61 Feb 0.93
2020 ‐‐ Mar 0.94
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.96
2040 ‐‐ May 1.00
2050 ‐‐ Jun 1.08
2060 ‐‐ Jul 1.09
Aug 1.08
Sep 1.02
Oct 1.01
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.95
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Beginning in 2020, the Wilkes County WTP will come online and replace this facility. See entity sheet
NWH‐89 for details.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐68b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of North Wilkesboro Type Return
Facility Thurman Street WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.96 0.94 0.98 1.01 0.86 0.91 0.87 0.89 0.95 0.73 0.65 0.70 0.87
2002 0.74 0.71 0.75 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.66 0.85 0.92 0.96 0.82 0.72 0.78
2003 0.71 0.88 0.98 1.04 0.80 0.97 0.84 0.85 0.76 0.70 0.74 0.84 0.84
2004 0.67 0.85 0.72 0.76 0.68 0.94 0.76 0.69 0.94 0.74 0.82 0.80 0.78
2005 0.73 0.73 0.85 0.82 0.73 0.81 0.70 0.68 0.61 0.68 0.61 0.57 0.71
2006 0.62 0.54 0.60 0.67 0.66 0.86 0.69 0.75 0.74 0.62 0.73 0.76 0.69
2007 0.81 0.69 0.82 0.75 0.66 0.67 0.63 0.59 0.63 0.61 0.43 0.66 0.66
2008 0.78 0.83 0.74 0.65 0.56 0.51 0.60 0.59 0.62 0.60 0.54 0.57 0.63
2009 0.78 0.67 0.83 0.76 0.89 0.84 0.67 0.66 0.73 0.68 0.84 0.93 0.77
2010 0.73 0.89 0.75 0.65 0.88 0.71 0.71 0.79 0.74 0.63 0.68 0.69 0.74
2011 0.61 0.67 0.96 0.72 0.82 0.73 0.64 0.78 0.72 0.70 0.78 0.92 0.76
2012 0.99 0.89 0.94 1.00 1.09 0.90 0.89 0.86 0.92 0.94 0.64 0.69 0.90
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐68b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.80 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.80 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.81 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.83 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.85 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.87 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.90 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Wilkes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.80 Jan 1.06
2015 0.80 Feb 1.04
2020 0.81 Mar 1.13
2030 0.83 Apr 1.02
2040 0.85 May 1.10
2050 0.87 Jun 0.98
2060 0.90 Jul 0.93
Aug 0.96
Sep 0.98
Oct 0.93
Nov 0.88
Dec 1.00
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWL‐69a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Norwood Type Withdrawal
Facility Norwood WTP Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.37 0.36 0.41 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.43
2002 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.36 0.39 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.35 0.33 0.32 0.37
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.40 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.44 0.33 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.44 0.39 0.40 0.39
2008 0.47 0.39 0.41 0.40 0.44 0.50 0.49 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.44
2009 0.40 0.42 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.48 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.40 0.42 0.50 0.43
2010 0.51 0.48 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.57 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.43 0.40 0.44 0.48
2011 0.47 0.44 0.40 0.41 0.46 0.47 0.47 0.42 0.40 0.69 0.40 0.45 0.46
2012 0.36 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.44 0.41 0.51 0.51 0.42 0.39 0.36 0.37 0.40
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWL‐69a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.52 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.54 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.34%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.39%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Stanly County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.45 Jan 1.00
2015 0.45 Feb 0.97
2020 0.46 Mar 0.93
2030 0.48 Apr 0.93
2040 0.50 May 1.02
2050 0.52 Jun 1.06
2060 0.54 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.03
Sep 1.02
Oct 1.06
Nov 0.91
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐69b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Norwood Type Return
Facility Norwood WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.57 0.51 0.40 0.44 0.41 0.42 0.44 0.61 0.65 0.51
2002 0.46 0.45 0.50 0.42 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.29 0.32 0.42 0.43 0.46 0.39
2003 0.29 0.61 0.71 0.65 0.64 0.71 0.48 0.69 0.38 0.30 0.25 0.27 0.50
2004 0.20 0.53 0.47 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.35 0.50 0.28 0.21 0.21 0.35
2005 0.26 0.33 0.47 0.41 0.25 0.39 0.37 0.40 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.43 0.34
2006 0.35 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.21 0.33 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.30 0.51 0.35 0.30
2007 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.37 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.22 0.29
2008 0.23 0.28 0.36 0.37 0.24 0.25 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.28 0.25 0.38 0.31
2009 0.33 0.31 0.57 0.39 0.34 0.31 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.18 0.29 0.42 0.30
2010 0.44 0.49 0.34 0.17 0.19 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.09 0.22
2011 0.13 0.22 0.32 0.23 0.26 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.20
2012 0.25 0.19 0.22 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.20 0.23 0.19 0.14 0.10 0.23 0.18
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐69b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.22 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.23 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.24 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.34%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.39%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Stanly County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.20 Jan 1.20
2015 0.20 Feb 1.26
2020 0.21 Mar 1.46
2030 0.22 Apr 1.12
2040 0.22 May 0.95
2050 0.23 Jun 0.89
2060 0.24 Jul 0.91
Aug 0.91
Sep 0.88
Oct 0.74
Nov 0.69
Dec 0.99
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐70a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Pilot Mountain Type Withdrawal
Facility Pilot Mountain WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.91 0.85 0.92 1.07 1.11 1.10 1.17 1.07 0.92 0.79 0.57 0.50 0.92
2002 0.38 0.41 0.43 0.51 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.40
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.26 0.21 0.20 0.26
2008 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
2009 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.26 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.21
2010 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.23
2011 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
2012 0.25 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.24 0.28 0.27 0.30 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.26
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐70a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.25 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.25 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.25 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.26 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.25 Jan 0.96
2015 0.25 Feb 0.98
2020 0.25 Mar 0.96
2030 0.26 Apr 0.97
2040 0.27 May 1.00
2050 0.27 Jun 1.05
2060 0.28 Jul 1.05
Aug 1.10
Sep 1.04
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.95
Dec 0.94
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐70b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Pilot Mountain Type Return
Facility Pilot Mountain WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.22 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.21
2002 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.23 0.22 0.35 0.18 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.22
2003 0.19 0.33 0.18 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.17
2004 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.15
2005 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.14 0.05 0.06 0.10
2006 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.07
2007 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.08
2008 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.06 0.07 0.07
2009 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07
2010 0.08 0.16 0.11 0.16 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.14
2011 0.19 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.17 0.13 0.15
2012 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.20 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.13 0.17 0.13 0.15
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐70b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.14 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.15 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.15 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.15 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.16 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.16 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.16 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: Not Used
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: Not Used
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.14 Jan 1.02
2015 0.15 Feb 1.01
2020 0.15 Mar 0.87
2030 0.15 Apr 1.00
2040 0.16 May 0.91
2050 0.16 Jun 1.16
2060 0.16 Jul 1.01
Aug 0.99
Sep 1.04
Oct 0.94
Nov 1.04
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Projections based on average percentage of WTP return to use from 2010‐2012
multiplied times the water use projections
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐70c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Pilot Mountain Type Return
Facility Pilot Mountain WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.86 0.80 0.89 1.06 0.97 0.91 0.93 0.90 0.74 0.70 0.63 0.56 0.83
2002 0.37 0.40 0.46 0.40 0.35 0.31 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.34 0.34 0.38 0.36
2003 0.34 0.39 0.40 0.39 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.34 0.35 0.35
2004 0.34 0.39 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.26
2005 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.20
2006 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23
2007 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.22
2008 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17
2009 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.13 0.17 0.16
2010 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.17
2011 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.25 0.25 0.30 0.31 0.23 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.23
2012 0.15 0.16 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.17
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐70c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.19 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.19 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.19 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.21 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Surry County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.19 Jan 1.00
2015 0.19 Feb 1.01
2020 0.19 Mar 1.08
2030 0.20 Apr 1.02
2040 0.20 May 1.03
2050 0.21 Jun 1.04
2060 0.21 Jul 1.04
Aug 1.07
Sep 1.00
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.86
Dec 0.91
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐71 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Troy Type Return
Facility Troy WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.72 0.78 0.65 0.70 0.57 0.52 0.61 0.64 0.61 0.54 0.61 0.63 0.63
2002 0.74 0.69 0.62 0.48 0.46 0.44 0.45 0.49 0.61 0.81 0.84 0.58 0.60
2003 0.78 0.56 0.66 0.66 0.82 0.70 0.54 0.61 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.48 0.60
2004 0.46 0.56 0.49 0.38 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.39 0.56 0.45 0.41 0.43 0.44
2005 0.47 0.47 0.58 0.53 0.42 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.48 0.46
2006 0.43 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.35 0.49 0.33 0.39 0.48 0.45 0.68 0.58 0.45
2007 0.74 0.51 0.54 0.53 0.41 0.43 0.37 0.38 0.35 0.39 0.37 0.45 0.46
2008 0.46 0.45 0.50 0.48 0.37 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.39 0.32 0.34 0.41 0.38
2009 0.43 0.38 0.61 0.45 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.30 0.32 0.48 0.53 0.41
2010 0.53 0.65 0.51 0.37 0.38 0.44 0.31 0.38 0.36 0.38 0.33 0.35 0.41
2011 0.36 0.41 0.49 0.38 0.38 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.51 0.51 0.56 0.52 0.43
2012 0.59 0.58 0.54 0.46 0.44 0.40 0.47 0.51 0.46 0.46 0.45 0.53 0.49
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐71
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.47 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.48 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.49 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Montgomery County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.45 Jan 1.21
2015 0.45 Feb 1.15
2020 0.46 Mar 1.23
2030 0.47 Apr 1.03
2040 0.48 May 0.93
2050 0.49 Jun 0.85
2060 0.50 Jul 0.81
Aug 0.90
Sep 0.92
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.98
Dec 1.08
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐72a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Wilkesboro Type Return
Facility Cub Creek WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.13 3.16 3.40 3.69 3.88 3.94 3.28 2.83 2.65 2.80 2.53 2.67 3.16
2002 3.49 3.50 3.07 3.14 3.86 3.31 3.15 3.22 3.27 3.53 3.60 3.77 3.41
2003 3.71 3.92 3.56 3.74 3.45 3.79 3.40 3.57 3.30 3.54 3.54 3.53 3.58
2004 2.81 2.94 2.94 2.93 3.28 3.82 3.40 3.40 3.81 3.14 3.25 3.15 3.24
2005 3.32 3.35 3.47 2.74 3.00 3.09 3.36 3.56 2.95 3.48 3.27 3.24 3.24
2006 3.36 3.11 2.96 3.41 3.18 3.26 3.52 3.50 3.71 3.93 3.94 3.14 3.42
2007 3.40 3.03 3.25 3.23 3.38 3.44 3.09 3.11 2.47 3.11 3.00 3.12 3.14
2008 3.20 3.18 2.38 2.82 2.52 2.68 2.70 3.06 2.59 2.46 2.21 2.49 2.69
2009 3.19 2.74 2.89 2.95 3.66 3.13 2.96 2.92 3.00 2.91 3.55 3.66 3.13
2010 3.82 3.76 4.06 3.91 3.39 3.50 2.89 3.06 3.48 3.38 2.96 3.69 3.49
2011 3.33 3.63 4.00 3.68 3.93 3.50 3.55 3.57 3.23 3.61 3.25 3.41 3.56
2012 3.92 3.48 3.17 3.36 4.31 4.30 3.68 3.66 3.71 3.66 3.53 3.67 3.71
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐72a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.58 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.61 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.66 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.75 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.84 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.04 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Wilkes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.58 Jan 1.06
2015 3.61 Feb 1.01
2020 3.66 Mar 1.00
2030 3.75 Apr 1.01
2040 3.84 May 1.07
2050 3.94 Jun 1.04
2060 4.04 Jul 0.96
Aug 0.98
Sep 0.94
Oct 0.97
Nov 0.94
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐72b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Wilkesboro Type Withdrawal
Facility Wilkesboro WFP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.60 3.50 3.60 3.80 4.00 3.90 3.90 4.10 4.10 4.00 3.50 3.60 3.80
2002 4.50 4.46 4.17 4.43 4.76 4.92 5.08 5.04 4.68 4.63 4.42 4.58 4.64
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 4.33 4.43 4.34 4.43 5.07 4.83 4.54 4.90 4.54 4.68 4.30 4.04 4.54
2008 4.20 4.35 4.35 4.43 4.38 4.76 4.59 4.53 4.35 4.42 4.05 4.21 4.38
2009 4.46 3.89 3.92 4.14 4.28 4.47 4.61 4.55 4.44 4.47 4.36 4.38 4.33
2010 4.72 4.63 4.40 4.10 4.14 4.35 4.25 4.01 4.24 3.88 3.25 3.91 4.15
2011 4.20 3.91 3.78 3.70 3.96 4.31 4.18 4.49 4.02 4.52 3.77 3.53 4.03
2012 4.14 3.87 3.61 3.51 4.40 4.56 4.46 4.42 4.14 4.34 4.02 3.92 4.12
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐72b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.10 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.13 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Wilkes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 4.10 Jan 1.02
2015 4.13 Feb 0.98
2020 ‐‐ Mar 0.95
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.95
2040 ‐‐ May 1.03
2050 ‐‐ Jun 1.07
2060 ‐‐ Jul 1.04
Aug 1.05
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.03
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.94
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Beginning in 2020, the Wilkes County WTP will come online and replace this facility. See entity sheet
NWH‐89 for details.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐73a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Yadkinville Type Withdrawal
Facility Yadkinville WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.04 0.99 0.90 0.93 1.05 1.08 1.21 1.24 1.18 1.05 0.93 0.85 1.04
2002 0.90 0.87 0.80 0.88 0.90 1.05 1.09 1.06 0.93 0.83 0.94 0.88 0.93
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.86 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.98 1.00 1.12 1.03 0.96 0.86 0.85 0.92
2008 0.86 0.92 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.98 1.00 1.04 0.96 0.93 0.77 0.75 0.90
2009 0.63 0.62 0.62 0.63 0.62 0.75 0.80 0.77 0.77 0.71 0.69 0.67 0.69
2010 0.78 0.81 0.77 0.79 0.91 0.93 1.00 0.97 0.93 0.86 0.82 0.76 0.86
2011 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75 0.82 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.99 0.84 0.78 0.79 0.85
2012 0.79 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.83 0.91 0.96 0.93 0.89 0.82 0.78 0.68 0.81
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐73a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.84 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.85 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.86 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.88 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.90 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.93 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.95 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Yadkin County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.84 Jan 0.93
2015 0.85 Feb 0.91
2020 0.86 Mar 0.91
2030 0.88 Apr 0.92
2040 0.90 May 0.99
2050 0.93 Jun 1.10
2060 0.95 Jul 1.14
Aug 1.15
Sep 1.10
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.89
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐73b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Yadkinville Type Return
Facility Yadkinville WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.77 0.83 0.86 0.83 0.79 0.79 0.71 0.68 0.67 0.65 0.59 0.57 0.73
2002 0.60 0.54 0.57 0.54 0.60 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.61 0.60 0.66 0.70 0.61
2003 0.60 0.70 0.73 0.74 0.73 0.90 0.74 0.70 0.67 0.58 0.59 0.61 0.69
2004 0.56 0.62 0.61 0.67 0.78 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.84 0.68 0.70 0.71 0.68
2005 0.69 0.68 0.78 0.79 0.65 0.68 0.78 0.78 0.71 0.77 0.69 0.73 0.73
2006 0.77 0.71 0.73 0.65 0.66 0.74 0.69 0.69 0.71 0.66 0.73 0.71 0.70
2007 0.84 0.68 0.72 0.67 0.62 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.74 0.77 0.65 0.71 0.71
2008 0.64 0.68 0.67 0.74 0.69 0.67 0.65 0.72 0.79 0.69 0.59 0.68 0.68
2009 0.65 0.60 0.73 0.69 0.69 0.79 0.66 0.70 0.75 0.70 0.83 0.87 0.72
2010 0.89 0.94 0.87 0.76 0.73 0.69 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.75 0.69 0.73 0.77
2011 0.68 0.70 0.81 0.75 0.79 0.82 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.78 0.86 0.84 0.79
2012 0.71 0.66 0.69 0.64 0.76 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.81 0.69 0.64 0.66 0.71
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐73b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.75 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.76 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.77 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.79 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.81 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.83 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.85 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Yadkin County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.75 Jan 1.01
2015 0.76 Feb 0.97
2020 0.77 Mar 1.02
2030 0.79 Apr 0.97
2040 0.81 May 0.98
2050 0.83 Jun 1.00
2060 0.85 Jul 0.98
Aug 1.01
Sep 1.06
Oct 1.00
Nov 0.97
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Union County Public Works Type Return
Facility Crooked Creek WWTP #2 Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.14 1.37 1.33 1.17 1.06 0.98 1.02 0.88 0.94 1.10 1.26 1.42 1.14
2002 1.43 1.24 1.34 1.06 0.99 0.81 0.87 0.88 1.15 1.26 1.44 1.64 1.18
2003 1.16 1.66 1.69 1.79 1.55 1.38 1.40 1.27 0.93 0.98 0.92 1.03 1.31
2004 0.98 1.23 1.00 0.84 0.69 0.86 0.82 0.91 1.19 0.86 0.92 0.97 0.94
2005 0.99 1.23 1.39 1.24 0.93 1.13 1.11 1.19 1.12 1.37 1.21 1.64 1.21
2006 1.47 1.47 1.32 1.26 1.30 1.41 1.44 1.47 1.55 1.51 1.50 1.22 1.41
2007 1.42 1.29 1.39 1.24 1.08 1.26 1.32 1.28 1.31 1.36 1.19 1.32 1.29
2008 1.03 1.19 1.19 1.16 1.03 0.91 1.03 1.09 1.08 1.09 1.09 1.11 1.08
2009 1.11 0.99 1.37 1.02 0.99 1.02 0.84 0.90 0.81 0.84 1.08 1.33 1.03
2010 1.18 1.37 1.12 0.85 0.91 1.09 0.98 0.91 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.87 0.97
2011 0.88 0.99 1.11 0.98 0.91 0.96 0.98 1.05 0.99 1.04 1.00 1.07 1.00
2012 1.14 1.04 1.14 1.11 1.15 0.97 1.04 1.08 1.04 0.97 0.89 1.01 1.05
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 1.05
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.07
2020 ‐‐ Mar 1.14
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.99
2040 ‐‐ May 0.94
2050 ‐‐ Jun 0.97
2060 ‐‐ Jul 0.96
Aug 0.98
Sep 0.94
Oct 0.95
Nov 0.94
Dec 1.05
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
See Union County Public Works projections in other tables (values not displayed on this sheet).
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Union County Public Works Type Return
Facility Hunley Creek WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.10
2002 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.17
2003 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20
2004 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.19
2005 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.20 0.24 0.21
2006 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.22 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.21
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2010 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2011 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2012 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐WWTP was taken out of service May 10, 2006 and remains inactive (per Union County WW System Performance Summary)
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 0.98
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.04
2020 ‐‐ Mar 1.08
2030 ‐‐ Apr 1.06
2040 ‐‐ May 0.96
2050 ‐‐ Jun 0.95
2060 ‐‐ Jul 0.94
Aug 0.95
Sep 0.96
Oct 0.97
Nov 1.01
Dec 1.10
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐No projected flows because plant is permanently closed.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Union County Public Works Type Return
Facility Grassy Branch WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2003 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2004 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
2006 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
2007 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
2008 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2009 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.02
2010 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
2011 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04
2012 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.03 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.03 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.04 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.04 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.05 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.06 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.07 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.03 Jan 1.14
2015 0.03 Feb 1.21
2020 0.04 Mar 1.39
2030 0.04 Apr 1.01
2040 0.05 May 0.99
2050 0.06 Jun 0.78
2060 0.07 Jul 0.69
Aug 0.88
Sep 1.01
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.87
Dec 1.12
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRB‐76d Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Union County Public Works Type Return
Facility Tallwood Estates WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2002 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2003 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02
2004 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2005 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.02
2006 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03
2007 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2008 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
2009 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.03
2010 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
2011 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
2012 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐76d
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.03 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.03 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.04 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.04 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.05 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.06 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.07 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.83%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.74%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Union County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.03 Jan 1.15
2015 0.03 Feb 1.25
2020 0.04 Mar 1.32
2030 0.04 Apr 1.04
2040 0.05 May 0.94
2050 0.06 Jun 0.93
2060 0.07 Jul 0.90
Aug 0.87
Sep 0.82
Oct 0.83
Nov 0.86
Dec 1.10
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWB‐77a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County Type Withdrawal
Facility Mt. Pleasant WTF Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.32 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.27
2002 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.26
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.26 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.25
2008 0.24 0.26 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23
2009 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.27 0.30 0.25
2010 0.28 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.29
2011 0.28 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.28
2012 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.24
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWB‐77a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.31 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.35 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.40 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.46 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.53 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.56%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.37%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Cabarrus County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.27 Jan 0.97
2015 0.28 Feb 0.94
2020 0.31 Mar 0.95
2030 0.35 Apr 0.97
2040 0.40 May 1.03
2050 0.46 Jun 1.06
2060 0.53 Jul 1.03
Aug 1.07
Sep 1.04
Oct 0.99
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.97
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐77c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County Type Return
Facility Rocky River WWTP (WSACC) Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 16.53 17.73 17.15 18.26 16.92 15.85 18.37 16.20 17.09 17.03 16.74 17.11 17.08
2002 14.42 14.00 15.08 14.43 14.40 13.95 14.02 13.89 13.43 14.82 15.63 16.57 14.56
2003 15.00 17.13 20.15 22.28 21.38 18.61 15.10 14.08 12.37 11.79 11.63 12.16 15.96
2004 11.64 13.57 13.13 12.58 12.58 12.61 12.75 12.57 15.83 12.62 13.26 13.31 13.03
2005 12.89 13.58 15.15 14.24 12.58 13.18 13.58 12.54 11.97 13.09 12.52 15.13 13.37
2006 14.16 13.01 13.20 13.16 12.80 13.30 12.83 15.04 15.91 14.23 17.57 14.87 14.17
2007 16.56 15.66 16.96 15.56 14.62 14.10 14.11 14.20 14.37 14.27 12.76 13.55 14.72
2008 13.69 14.49 15.58 15.40 13.88 12.97 13.36 17.04 14.67 13.03 12.58 14.67 14.28
2009 14.65 13.39 18.70 15.30 14.19 14.51 14.08 13.21 12.90 12.94 15.26 16.80 14.67
2010 17.67 18.41 15.80 14.00 13.95 13.93 13.17 14.05 13.69 13.27 11.73 13.63 14.42
2011 12.34 14.21 14.71 14.89 14.65 14.63 13.15 13.19 14.00 13.44 14.76 16.37 14.19
2012 16.65 16.56 14.65 13.43 14.75 14.00 13.14 13.38 13.08 12.70 12.35 12.76 13.95
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐77c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 14.19 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.22 14.86 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 12.63 16.06 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 12.95 18.40 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 13.95 21.08 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 18.72 24.15 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 21.55 27.66 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.56%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.37%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Cabarrus County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 14.19 Jan 1.06
2015 14.86 Feb 1.08
2020 16.06 Mar 1.12
2030 18.40 Apr 1.03
2040 21.08 May 1.00
2050 24.15 Jun 0.98
2060 27.66 Jul 0.94
Aug 0.99
Sep 0.96
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.92
Dec 1.02
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Wholesale projections shown above assume that 85% of Rocky River subbasin water flows required by
Catawba IBT agreement will become wastewater treated at Rocky River WWTP.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐81 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority, Inc Type Return
Facility Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.80 0.84 0.91 0.84 0.89 0.91 0.86 0.90 0.90
2002 0.80 0.72 0.77 0.69 0.66 0.59 0.64 0.65 0.64 0.75 0.75 0.83 0.71
2003 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.69 0.82 0.78 0.66 0.62 0.58 0.62 0.71 0.75
2004 0.61 0.75 0.62 0.61 0.53 0.55 0.53 0.56 0.68 0.59 0.61 0.64 0.61
2005 0.55 0.55 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.53 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.54 0.63 0.57
2006 0.64 0.57 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.56 0.55 0.49 0.55 0.49 0.62 0.59 0.56
2007 0.66 0.56 0.61 0.51 0.47 0.49 0.47 0.70 0.52 0.41 0.53 0.67 0.55
2008 0.58 0.63 0.58 0.65 0.54 0.55 0.52 0.54 0.57 0.53 0.51 0.68 0.57
2009 0.66 0.59 0.76 0.66 0.81 0.69 0.54 0.55 0.59 0.54 0.68 0.73 0.65
2010 0.65 0.67 0.57 0.48 0.48 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.38 0.40 0.57 0.61 0.50
2011 0.55 0.61 0.82 0.70 0.65 0.59 0.62 0.60 0.67 0.62 0.67 0.76 0.66
2012 0.66 0.64 0.77 0.66 0.74 0.61 0.70 0.57 0.66 0.60 0.55 0.66 0.65
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐81
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.60 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.61 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.62 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.63 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.65 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.66 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.68 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR values
for Surry, Wilkes, and Yadkin Counties. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the
service area compared to the overall county‐average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.60 Jan 1.05
2015 0.61 Feb 1.03
2020 0.62 Mar 1.15
2030 0.63 Apr 1.02
2040 0.65 May 1.03
2050 0.66 Jun 0.94
2060 0.68 Jul 0.91
Aug 0.94
Sep 0.94
Oct 0.86
Nov 0.98
Dec 1.14
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐84 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Charlotte Type Return
Facility Cabarrus Woods WWTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.24 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.24 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.26
2002 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.36 0.35 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.46 0.44 0.36 0.37
2003 0.33 0.39 0.31 0.43 0.42 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.34
2004 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29
2005 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.30
2006 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.29 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.23 0.29
2007 0.25 0.46 0.67 0.73 0.50 0.53 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.48 0.51
2008 0.40 0.46 0.94 0.57 0.52 0.52 0.46 0.32 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.41 0.45
2009 0.23 0.34 0.63 0.54 0.52 0.53 0.38 0.36 0.42 0.51 0.65 0.47 0.47
2010 0.44 0.62 0.51 0.50 0.43 0.38 0.34 0.39 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.40 0.42
2011 0.41 0.45 0.48 0.44 0.46 0.41 0.40 0.42 0.34 0.37 0.51 0.51 0.43
2012 0.45 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.45
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRB‐84
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.43 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.45 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.49 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.56 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.64 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.74 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.84 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 1.56%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 1.37%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Cabarrus County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.43 Jan 0.80
2015 0.45 Feb 1.03
2020 0.49 Mar 1.42
2030 0.56 Apr 1.23
2040 0.64 May 1.07
2050 0.74 Jun 1.05
2060 0.84 Jul 0.91
Aug 0.88
Sep 0.82
Oct 0.87
Nov 1.01
Dec 1.00
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐2012 data forecasted based on 2011 data and county AGR
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐86 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Cleveland Type Return
Facility Cleveland WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.13
2002 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.12
2003 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.12
2004 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.13
2005 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.14
2006 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.13
2007 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.12
2008 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.12
2009 0.12 0.01 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10
2010 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.10
2011 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.11
2012 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.11
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRH‐86
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.11 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.12 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.34%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.32%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Applied AGR values shown above are based on Projected AGR values for Rowan County.
‐‐
‐‐
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.11 Jan 0.87
2015 0.11 Feb 0.76
2020 0.11 Mar 0.92
2030 0.11 Apr 0.90
2040 0.12 May 0.99
2050 0.12 Jun 1.18
2060 0.12 Jul 1.17
Aug 1.28
Sep 1.19
Oct 0.96
Nov 0.88
Dec 0.90
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐87 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Energy United Water Type Withdrawal
Facility Energy United Water WTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.82 0.70 0.73 0.79 0.78 0.85 0.97 0.84 1.03 0.82 0.72 0.71 0.81
2002 1.38 1.41 1.38 1.51 1.52 1.65 1.38 0.83 1.61 1.68 1.73 1.59 1.47
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.02 0.90 1.04 1.22 1.55 1.48 1.50 1.71 1.57 1.52 1.29 1.37 1.35
2008 1.41 1.42 1.64 1.70 1.85 2.04 1.94 1.95 1.88 1.79 1.76 1.79 1.77
2009 1.61 1.49 1.49 1.54 1.60 1.72 1.84 1.75 1.65 1.51 1.47 1.42 1.59
2010 1.53 1.46 1.50 1.57 1.71 1.79 1.86 1.67 1.71 1.61 1.55 1.59 1.63
2011 1.64 1.47 1.51 1.57 1.72 1.84 1.91 1.90 1.75 1.67 1.57 1.56 1.68
2012 1.60 1.57 1.56 1.61 1.76 1.96 1.81 1.79 1.70 1.67 1.50 1.59 1.68
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWH‐87
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.66 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.67 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.69 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.74 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.78 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.83 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.87 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Alexander County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.66 Jan 0.91
2015 1.67 Feb 0.86
2020 1.69 Mar 0.90
2030 1.74 Apr 0.95
2040 1.78 May 1.05
2050 1.83 Jun 1.12
2060 1.87 Jul 1.12
Aug 1.11
Sep 1.06
Oct 1.01
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.96
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWB‐88 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Richmond County Type Withdrawal
Facility Richmond County WTP Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 3.70 3.60 3.19 3.58 3.70 4.31 4.05 4.06 4.08 3.58 3.36 2.64 3.65
2002 2.55 2.27 1.96 2.77 3.11 4.41 3.71 4.24 4.23 2.96 3.86 2.52 3.22
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 3.29 3.10 2.65 3.32 3.31 4.38 4.27 4.71 5.48 5.05 4.03 3.22 3.90
2008 2.60 2.50 2.00 2.80 2.90 3.80 3.70 4.20 4.80 4.40 3.50 2.60 3.32
2009 3.00 2.30 2.10 2.00 2.40 3.30 3.50 3.70 3.40 2.60 2.50 2.00 2.74
2010 2.60 2.70 2.10 3.20 2.40 3.00 3.20 4.20 4.10 3.40 2.60 2.20 2.97
2011 3.63 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.80 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.00 3.30 2.40 3.73
2012 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWB‐88
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.35 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.38 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.42 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.51 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.60 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.69 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.78 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 3.35 Jan 0.91
2015 3.38 Feb 0.82
2020 3.42 Mar 0.72
2030 3.51 Apr 0.88
2040 3.60 May 0.89
2050 3.69 Jun 1.14
2060 3.78 Jul 1.15
Aug 1.28
Sep 1.34
Oct 1.17
Nov 0.96
Dec 0.75
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
z NRD‐88b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Richmond County Type Return
Facility Richmond County WTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.10
2002 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.19 0.21 0.30 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.20 0.10 0.08 0.20
2003 0.32 0.15 0.09 0.12 0.19 0.14 0.25 0.21 0.12 0.17 0.16 0.13 0.17
2004 0.18 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.25 0.20 0.17 0.32 0.34 0.28 0.21 0.29 0.21
2005 0.28 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.33 0.32 0.36 0.33 0.30 0.25 0.24 0.20 0.28
2006 0.28 0.32 0.34 0.23 0.20 0.19 ND 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.27 0.22 0.25
2007 0.33 0.39 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.26
2008 0.10 0.19 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.36 0.37 0.45 0.36 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.27
2009 0.28 0.26 0.35 0.32 0.34 0.42 0.41 0.49 0.43 0.39 0.40 0.36 0.37
2010 0.45 0.44 0.54 0.27 ND 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.35
2011 0.31 0.41 0.31 0.28 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.22 0.21 0.27 0.24
2012 0.33 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.16 0.11 0.14 0.21 0.29 0.19 0.21
Data Source: NC Local Water Supply Plan database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRD‐88b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.27 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.29 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.29 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.30 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.27 Jan 1.05
2015 0.27 Feb 1.09
2020 0.27 Mar 1.11
2030 0.28 Apr 0.97
2040 0.29 May 0.86
2050 0.29 Jun 1.09
2060 0.30 Jul 1.03
Aug 1.10
Sep 0.89
Oct 0.92
Nov 0.93
Dec 0.91
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWH‐89 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Wilkes County Type Withdrawal
Facility Wilkes County WTP (Future) Sub‐basin W. Kerr Scott Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
This future facility will replace two existing facilities: (a) North Wilksboro WP (entity ID: NWH‐68a) and (b) Wilkesboro WFP
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
(entity ID: NWH‐72b). See those two entity sheets for historical flow data.
ID No. NWH‐89
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.83 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.00 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.18 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.36 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 7.55 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Wilkes County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 1.00
2015 ‐‐ Feb 0.96
2020 6.83 Mar 0.95
2030 7.00 Apr 0.95
2040 7.18 May 1.02
2050 7.36 Jun 1.07
2060 7.55 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
Projections assume that this new facility will come online in 2020. At that point, all flows from
(a) North Wilksboro WP (entity ID: NWH‐68a) and (b) Wilkesboro WFP (entity ID: NWH‐72b) will be
transferred to this new combined facility and then projected forward.
Monthly coefficients shown below are based on combined historical flow data for the two entities listed
above (NWH‐68a, NWH‐72b).
‐‐
ID No. NRD‐90a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Rockingham Type Return
Facility Rockingham WWTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 5.61 5.79 5.24 5.11 4.76 4.41 4.93 4.15 4.10 4.46 4.37 4.70 4.80
2002 3.38 4.49 4.51 4.66 3.87 3.77 4.00 3.90 3.87 4.82 5.13 5.22 4.30
2003 4.84 5.77 6.50 5.88 5.57 5.51 4.66 5.57 5.08 4.59 4.25 4.38 5.21
2004 4.19 4.86 4.91 4.38 4.29 4.23 3.92 4.12 5.27 4.22 3.41 3.21 4.25
2005 3.59 3.64 4.22 4.24 3.63 4.05 4.04 4.09 3.00 3.93 3.46 4.36 3.86
2006 4.18 4.10 3.86 3.30 3.27 4.10 3.35 3.67 3.37 3.40 4.92 4.45 3.83
2007 4.98 4.88 4.92 4.05 3.55 3.53 3.24 3.22 3.19 3.37 3.03 3.41 3.78
2008 4.05 3.84 4.17 4.88 3.78 3.28 4.38 4.41 5.77 3.60 3.46 4.07 4.14
2009 3.67 3.41 3.93 3.35 2.91 2.59 2.66 2.73 2.40 2.39 2.95 3.95 3.08
2010 3.79 4.43 3.42 2.56 2.05 2.33 2.10 2.22 2.35 2.71 2.28 2.39 2.71
2011 2.51 2.86 2.75 2.76 2.57 2.24 2.15 2.25 2.16 2.20 2.33 2.24 2.42
2012 2.35 2.33 2.74 3.12 3.07 2.91 3.05 3.68 3.38 3.37 2.95 3.14 3.01
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRD‐90a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.71 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.73 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.77 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.84 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.91 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.98 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.06 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 2.71 Jan 1.00
2015 2.73 Feb 0.96
2020 2.77 Mar 0.95
2030 2.84 Apr 0.95
2040 2.91 May 1.02
2050 2.98 Jun 1.07
2060 3.06 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐90b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Rockingham Type Withdrawal
Facility Rockingham WTP (City Pond intake) Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.98 1.01 0.98 0.93 1.04 1.16 1.23 1.21 1.19 1.10 0.99 1.03 1.07
2002 0.79 0.83 0.82 0.90 0.85 0.84 0.66 0.65 0.83 0.76 0.79 0.85 0.80
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.98 1.01 0.98 1.02 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.27 1.11 1.10 0.96 0.94 1.07
2008 0.84 0.84 0.78 0.91 0.94 0.93 0.87 0.92 0.86 0.94 0.88 0.93 0.89
2009 0.92 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.80 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.85 0.84 0.87
2010 0.78 0.78 0.83 0.88 0.85 0.87 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.85
2011 0.90 0.94 0.93 0.96 1.00 1.10 1.03 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.99 0.91 0.99
2012 0.89 0.92 1.00 1.40 1.44 1.44 1.09 1.04 0.94 1.04 0.98 0.93 1.09
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Rockingham facilities.
ID No. NWD‐90b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.98 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.98 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.02 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.05 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.07 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.10 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.98 Jan 1.00
2015 0.98 Feb 0.96
2020 1.00 Mar 0.95
2030 1.02 Apr 0.95
2040 1.05 May 1.02
2050 1.07 Jun 1.07
2060 1.10 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐90c Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Rockingham Type Withdrawal
Facility Rockingham WTP (Roberdel Lake intake) Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.96 2.02 1.95 1.86 2.08 2.31 2.46 2.43 2.37 2.21 1.98 2.07 2.14
2002 1.57 1.65 1.64 1.79 1.70 1.69 1.31 1.30 1.66 1.53 1.57 1.70 1.59
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.96 2.01 1.97 2.04 2.24 2.28 2.31 2.55 2.22 2.21 1.92 1.87 2.13
2008 1.67 1.68 1.57 1.81 1.87 1.87 1.74 1.84 1.72 1.87 1.77 1.86 1.77
2009 1.85 1.63 1.76 1.76 1.80 1.77 1.59 1.77 1.74 1.76 1.70 1.67 1.73
2010 1.56 1.57 1.67 1.77 1.70 1.74 1.69 1.72 1.74 1.69 1.71 1.74 1.69
2011 1.81 1.88 1.86 1.92 1.99 2.21 2.07 2.19 2.10 2.00 1.97 1.83 1.99
2012 1.77 1.83 2.00 2.79 2.88 2.89 2.18 2.08 1.89 2.08 1.95 1.86 2.18
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Historical Data above is based on the 2012 flow split between all City of Rockingham facilities.
ID No. NWD‐90c
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.95 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.97 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.99 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.04 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.09 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.15 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.20 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.95 Jan 1.00
2015 1.97 Feb 0.96
2020 1.99 Mar 0.95
2030 2.04 Apr 0.95
2040 2.09 May 1.02
2050 2.15 Jun 1.07
2060 2.20 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐91a Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Hamlet Type Withdrawal
Facility Hamlet WTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.12 1.11 1.06 1.13 1.35 1.43 1.51 1.72 1.64 1.60 1.42 1.33 1.37
2002 1.43 1.39 1.36 1.63 1.71 1.90 1.57 1.49 1.37 1.37 1.34 1.08 1.47
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.96 0.97 1.03 1.14 1.37 1.42 1.49 1.60 1.35 1.25 1.14 1.02 1.23
2008 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.17 1.42 1.26 1.17 1.09 0.93 0.87 0.86 1.06
2009 0.87 0.85 0.87 0.91 1.04 1.26 1.43 1.40 1.19 1.06 0.97 0.91 1.06
2010 1.10 0.97 0.99 1.20 1.28 1.33 1.32 1.45 1.43 1.21 1.12 1.01 1.20
2011 1.02 0.97 1.01 1.04 1.25 1.48 1.32 1.22 1.14 1.11 1.01 1.00 1.13
2012 1.00 1.02 1.12 1.13 1.22 1.29 1.31 1.68 1.19 1.08 1.02 0.96 1.17
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐91a
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.17 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.18 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.19 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.22 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.25 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.32 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 1.17 Jan 1.00
2015 1.18 Feb 0.96
2020 1.19 Mar 0.95
2030 1.22 Apr 0.95
2040 1.25 May 1.02
2050 1.28 Jun 1.07
2060 1.32 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
ID No. NRD‐91b Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity City of Hamlet Type Return
Facility Hamlet WWTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.80 0.84 0.78 0.66 0.66 0.58 0.76 0.68 0.62 0.69 0.75 0.77 0.72
2002 0.79 0.73 0.73 0.68 0.69 0.92 0.79 0.65 0.66 0.87 0.86 0.84 0.77
2003 0.76 0.83 0.99 0.96 0.87 1.00 0.96 1.08 0.87 0.82 0.86 0.78 0.90
2004 0.77 0.89 0.64 0.73 0.68 0.73 0.87 0.81 1.09 0.77 0.76 0.70 0.79
2005 0.79 0.78 0.77 0.72 0.71 0.86 1.21 1.02 0.66 0.94 0.76 0.91 0.85
2006 0.85 0.80 0.78 0.65 0.64 0.66 0.71 0.75 0.71 0.70 0.94 0.87 0.75
2007 0.90 0.88 0.91 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.70 0.65 0.77 0.75
2008 0.76 0.81 0.81 0.89 0.71 0.61 0.71 0.81 0.96 0.74 0.75 0.78 0.78
2009 0.71 0.70 0.82 0.73 0.69 0.65 0.65 0.54 0.65 0.66 0.74 0.87 0.70
2010 0.88 0.95 0.84 0.83 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.84 0.70 0.65 0.78
2011 0.62 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.73 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.68
2012 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.67 0.61 0.51 0.49 0.58 0.59 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.59
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NRD‐91b
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.68 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.69 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.70 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.72 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.73 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.75 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.77 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Richmond County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.68 Jan 1.00
2015 0.69 Feb 0.96
2020 0.70 Mar 0.95
2030 0.72 Apr 0.95
2040 0.73 May 1.02
2050 0.75 Jun 1.07
2060 0.77 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐93 Category Public Water/Wastewater Utilities
Entity Town of Wadesboro Type Withdrawal
Facility Town of Wadesboro WTP Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.15 1.30 1.75 1.32 1.28 1.44 1.36 1.65 1.72 1.62 1.05 1.20 1.40
2002 0.83 0.88 0.79 0.97 0.98 1.01 0.95 1.15 0.89 0.84 0.80 0.81 0.91
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 0.79 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.71 0.82 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.98 0.71 0.82
2008 0.79 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.71 0.82 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.92 0.98 0.71 0.82
2009 0.79 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.71 0.82 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.98 0.71 0.82
2010 0.70 0.70 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.80 0.72 0.76
2011 0.79 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.71 0.82 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.85 0.72 0.81
2012 0.79 0.82 0.75 0.80 0.71 0.82 0.70 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.85 0.72 0.81
Data Source: n/a
Customer Data
<Year> <Year> <Year> <Year>
Customer Type I II III I II III I II III I II III
Residential ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Commercial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Industrial ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Institutional ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Wholesale ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Other ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Unaccounted ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Notes: I ‐ Number of customers; II ‐ Per capita flow (gpd/c); III ‐ Total Flow (mgd)
Data Source: <Source>; <Contact Person>; <Date>
Historical Data Summary Notes
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
ID No. NWD‐93
(continued from previous page)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Projected Flowrates (mgd)
Customer Type
Year Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Wholesale Other Unaccounted
Base ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.80 ‐‐
2015 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.80 ‐‐
2020 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.81 ‐‐
2030 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.83 ‐‐
2040 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.86 ‐‐
2050 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.88 ‐‐
2060 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.90 ‐‐
Applied AGR 2012‐2020: 0.25%
Applied AGR 2030‐2060: 0.25%
Analysis and Projections Notes
Both Applied AGR values shown above were set to 0.25% rather than the (lower) projected AGR value
for Anson County. This is to account for the higher growth expected in the service area compared
to the overall county average growth during those periods.
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient
2012 0.80 Jan 1.00
2015 0.80 Feb 0.96
2020 0.81 Mar 0.95
2030 0.83 Apr 0.95
2040 0.86 May 1.02
2050 0.88 Jun 1.07
2060 0.90 Jul 1.06
Aug 1.06
Sep 1.01
Oct 1.02
Nov 0.94
Dec 0.94
‐‐
Table of Contents for
Industrial Projection Sheets
Page No. Basin ID No. Entity Facility1 New IND Multiple N/A2 NRH‐01 Allegheny Technologies, Inc ATI Allvac Monroe Plant3 NRN‐02 Aluminum Company Of America Badin Works4 NWW‐08a Blue Ridge Tissue Corp Patterson Mill5 NRW‐08b Blue Ridge Tissue Corp Patterson Mill (return)6 NRD‐92 Burlington Industries LLC Richmond Plant7 NWD‐94a B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1)8 NWD‐94b B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3)9 NWD‐94c B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4)10 NRB‐35a Hedrick Industries Aquadale Quarry11 NWB‐35b Hedrick Industries Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond)12 NWB‐35c Hedrick Industries Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond)13 NWH‐40a Louisiana Pacific Corporation Lousiana Pacific Corporation14 NRH‐40b Louisiana Pacific Corporation LP Roaring River WWTP15 NRH‐45 P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc PPG Industries Fiber Glass Products16 NRH‐46a Performance Fibers, Inc Salisbury Facility17 NWH‐46b Performance Fibers, Inc Salisbury Facility18 NWB‐55 Teledyne Allvac Monroe Plant19 NWB‐56 The Fork, LLC The Fork, LLC20 NWH‐74a True Textiles, Inc True Elkin, Inc.21 NRH‐74b True Textiles, Inc 304 East Main Street Plant
22 NRH‐75 Tyson Foods, Inc Harmony Plant
23 NRH‐78 Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn Dobson Plant
24 NRB‐83 Carolina Stalite Company Carolina Stalite Company
25 NRH‐85 Norfolk Southern Railway Company Linwood Yard
Industrial Projections TOC
Source:
New Future Industry
Basin Projected (MGD)
ID Name Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NWW‐00 W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
NWH‐00 High Rock Lake ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NWT‐00 Tuckertown Reservoir ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
NWN‐00 Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake) ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
NWF‐00 Falls Reservoir ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
NWL‐00 Lake Tillery ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NWB‐00 Blewett Falls Lake ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NWD‐00 Downstream of Blewett Falls Lake Subbasin (NC) ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Draft Projections 1 of 25 12/11/2014
ID No. NRH‐01 Category Industrial
Entity Allegheny Technologies, Inc Type Return
Facility ATI Allvac Monroe Plant Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.31 0.30 0.18 0.16 0.07 0.07 0.32 0.02 0.01 0.20 0.25 0.52 0.20
2002 0.20 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.14 0.19 0.13
2003 0.06 0.23 0.33 0.31 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.39 0.21 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.21
2004 0.06 0.17 0.24 0.20 0.12 0.26 0.16 0.16 0.46 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.17
2005 0.07 0.08 0.19 0.06 0.07 0.23 0.02 0.14 0.02 0.12 0.15 0.25 0.12
2006 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.10 0.46 0.05 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.36 0.18 0.15
2007 0.22 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.03 0.12 0.04 0.11 0.02 0.21 ND 0.13 0.12
2008 0.14 0.30 0.25 0.34 0.11 ND 0.07 0.24 0.12 0.08 0.15 0.16 0.18
2009 0.11 0.04 0.29 0.07 0.12 0.23 0.17 0.06 0.03 0.12 0.24 0.26 0.15
2010 0.24 0.31 0.19 0.01 0.10 0.21 0.20 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.16 0.10 0.14
2011 0.05 0.11 0.17 ND 0.18 0.16 0.05 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.13
2012 0.20 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.07 0.16 0.37 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.16
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐0.67%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.14 Jan 1.10 Jul 0.79
2015 0.14 Feb 1.12 Aug 1.15
2020 0.14 Mar 1.34 Sep 0.65
2030 0.14 Apr 0.93 Oct 0.81
2040 0.14 May 0.78 Nov 1.10
2050 0.14 Jun 1.10 Dec 1.16
2060 0.14
‐‐Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRN‐02 Category Industrial
Entity Aluminum Company Of America Type Return
Facility Badin Works Sub‐basin Narrows Reservoir (Badin Lake)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.59 0.45 0.45 0.50 0.43 0.48 0.83 0.55 0.52 0.60 0.69 0.72 0.57
2002 0.77 0.11 0.14 0.08 0.14 0.16 0.09 0.47 0.19 0.31 0.39 0.20 0.26
2003 0.15 0.31 0.42 0.34 0.52 0.20 0.24 0.40 0.24 0.09 0.60 0.10 0.30
2004 0.09 0.28 0.13 0.13 0.20 0.16 0.12 0.33 0.66 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.21
2005 0.33 0.15 0.94 0.18 0.09 0.21 0.25 0.09 0.07 0.21 0.26 0.40 0.27
2006 0.14 0.07 0.12 0.11 0.05 0.15 0.08 0.51 0.10 0.28 0.16 0.16 0.16
2007 0.35 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.10 0.09 0.33 0.02 0.01 0.12
2008 0.09 0.09 0.29 0.26 0.07 0.04 0.58 0.29 0.91 0.42 0.03 0.08 0.26
2009 0.31 0.04 0.37 0.23 0.15 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.41 0.35 0.61 0.20 0.26
2010 0.37 0.29 0.25 0.04 0.42 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.06 0.04 0.19
2011 0.06 0.17 0.35 0.24 0.11 0.08 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.12 0.08 0.24 0.14
2012 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.03 0.36 0.26 0.08 0.21 0.17 0.03 0.01 0.36 0.15
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐0.40%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.16 Jan 1.15 Jul 1.10
2015 0.16 Feb 0.72 Aug 0.79
2020 0.16 Mar 1.26 Sep 1.59
2030 0.16 Apr 0.83 Oct 1.23
2040 0.16 May 1.03 Nov 0.72
2050 0.16 Jun 0.72 Dec 0.83
2060 0.16
‐‐Primary Metal Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWW‐08a Category Industrial
Entity Blue Ridge Tissue Corp Type Withdrawal
Facility Patterson Mill Sub‐basin W. Kerr Scott Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 0.20 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.17 0.06 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.12
2009 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.15 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.10
2010 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.18 0.09 0.25 0.23 0.18
2011 0.25 0.18 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.22 0.21 0.19 0.20
2012 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.19
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐2.67%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.19 Jan 1.10 Jul 1.05
2015 0.19 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.18
2020 0.19 Mar 0.93 Sep 0.85
2030 0.19 Apr 0.94 Oct 0.83
2040 0.19 May 1.01 Nov 1.09
2050 0.19 Jun 1.05 Dec 0.97
2060 0.19
‐‐Paper Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRW‐08b Category Industrial
Entity Blue Ridge Tissue Corp Type Return
Facility Patterson Mill (return) Sub‐basin W. Kerr Scott Reservoir
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.17 0.23 0.11 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.11
2002 0.24 0.26 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.23
2003 0.23 0.24 0.22 0.13 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.17
2004 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.73 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.21
2005 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18
2006 0.18 0.11 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.22 0.20 0.15 0.18
2007 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.15 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.19
2008 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.14 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.15
2009 0.14 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.18 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.14
2010 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.21 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.34 0.25 0.10 0.25 0.31 0.22
2011 0.32 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.20 0.17 0.22
2012 0.19 0.18 0.23 0.22 0.13 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.20
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐2.67%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.21 Jan 1.07 Jul 1.12
2015 0.21 Feb 0.97 Aug 1.18
2020 0.21 Mar 0.94 Sep 1.03
2030 0.21 Apr 0.99 Oct 0.82
2040 0.21 May 0.94 Nov 0.91
2050 0.21 Jun 1.05 Dec 0.97
2060 0.21
‐‐Paper Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRB‐35a Category Industrial
Entity Hedrick Industries Type Return
Facility Aquadale Quarry Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.22 1.25 ND ND ND ND 1.24
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND 2.16 1.94 ND 2.16 2.16 ND ND ND ND ND 2.11
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.84 0.70 0.84 0.75 0.36 0.70
2007 0.50 0.46 0.50 0.49 0.24 0.31 0.19 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.37 0.27
2008 0.44 0.51 0.59 0.41 0.29 0.16 0.19 0.31 0.37 0.39 0.28 0.25 0.35
2009 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.18 0.11 0.28 0.23 0.13 0.34 0.47 0.37 0.27
2010 0.29 0.35 0.29 0.25 0.32 0.25 0.37 0.27 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.25 0.27
2011 0.23 0.31 0.28 0.39 0.30 0.29 0.23 0.33 0.29 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.30
2012 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.32 0.32 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.30
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.29 Jan 1.17 Jul 0.89
2015 0.29 Feb 1.27 Aug 0.86
2020 0.29 Mar 1.28 Sep 0.76
2030 0.29 Apr 1.19 Oct 0.87
2040 0.29 May 0.93 Nov 0.95
2050 0.29 Jun 0.81 Dec 1.05
2060 0.29
‐‐Mining (except oil and gas) sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWB‐35b Category Industrial
Entity Hedrick Industries Type Withdrawal
Facility Aquadale Quarry (Pump 1 ‐ Fresh Water Pond) Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
2009 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
2010 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
2011 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
2012 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.39 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 0.39 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 0.39 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 0.39 Apr 1.00 Oct 1.00
2040 0.39 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 0.39 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 0.39
‐‐Mining (except oil and gas) sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWB‐35c Category Industrial
Entity Hedrick Industries Type Withdrawal
Facility Aquadale Quarry (Pump 2 ‐ Cement Pond) Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
2009 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
2010 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
2011 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
2012 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.08 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 0.08 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 0.08 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 0.08 Apr 1.00 Oct 1.00
2040 0.08 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 0.08 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 0.08
‐‐Mining (except oil and gas) sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWH‐40a Category Industrial
Entity Louisiana Pacific Corporation Type Withdrawal
Facility Lousiana Pacific Corporation Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 1.30 1.40 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.45
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.80 1.90 1.30 1.80 1.20 1.10 1.00 1.20 1.70 1.50 1.00 1.30 1.40
2008 1.45 1.30 1.39 1.67 1.58 1.66 1.78 1.65 1.68 1.49 1.11 0.91 1.47
2009 1.18 0.92 0.70 0.73 0.60 0.59 0.95 1.51 1.83 1.78 1.55 1.52 1.16
2010 2.44 2.60 2.41 1.80 2.04 2.21 1.88 2.62 2.00 1.20 1.05 2.54 2.06
2011 2.31 2.46 2.63 2.79 2.56 2.83 2.70 2.88 2.60 1.85 1.62 2.16 2.45
2012 2.35 2.39 2.69 2.61 2.69 1.39 2.31 1.26 2.17 1.46 1.45 1.91 2.06
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐1.17%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 2.19 Jan 1.09 Jul 1.00
2015 2.19 Feb 1.09 Aug 1.05
2020 2.19 Mar 1.05 Sep 1.13
2030 2.19 Apr 1.08 Oct 0.88
2040 2.19 May 1.01 Nov 0.73
2050 2.19 Jun 0.92 Dec 0.97
2060 2.19
‐‐Wood Product Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐40b Category Industrial
Entity Louisiana Pacific Corporation Type Return
Facility LP Roaring River WWTP Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.93 0.97 0.91 0.83 0.73 0.80 0.83 0.81 0.75 0.88
2002 0.79 0.98 0.93 0.94 0.97 0.92 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.99 0.93 0.77 0.93
2003 0.88 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.97 0.79 0.61 0.69 0.85 0.85 0.86
2004 0.81 0.91 0.85 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.93
2005 1.07 1.20 1.22 1.34 1.47 1.44 1.49 1.43 1.32 1.38 1.37 0.81 1.30
2006 1.40 1.31 1.35 1.31 1.18 1.24 1.36 1.24 1.28 1.01 1.20 0.84 1.23
2007 1.33 1.37 0.80 1.33 1.15 1.13 1.33 1.21 1.23 1.29 1.17 1.31 1.22
2008 1.37 1.42 1.41 1.55 1.48 1.51 1.35 1.76 1.55 1.06 0.98 1.10 1.38
2009 1.49 1.60 1.27 1.41 1.10 1.14 1.63 1.55 1.52 1.26 0.75 0.93 1.30
2010 1.67 1.61 1.61 1.29 1.45 1.22 1.33 1.59 1.13 1.23 0.96 1.43 1.38
2011 1.52 1.50 1.44 1.47 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.40 1.11 1.13 0.98 0.82 1.21
2012 1.51 1.67 1.69 1.11 1.48 1.21 1.19 1.30 1.26 1.14 1.29 1.19 1.34
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐1.17%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 1.31 Jan 1.14 Jul 1.01
2015 1.31 Feb 1.17 Aug 1.13
2020 1.31 Mar 1.05 Sep 1.00
2030 1.31 Apr 1.04 Oct 0.91
2040 1.31 May 0.99 Nov 0.78
2050 1.31 Jun 0.92 Dec 0.87
2060 1.31
‐‐Wood Product Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐45 Category Industrial
Entity P P G Industries Fiber Glass Products, Inc Type Return
Facility PPG Industries Fiber Glass Products Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.44 0.41 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.39
2002 0.27 0.24 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.27
2003 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.30 0.31 0.30 0.32
2004 0.31 0.32 0.34 0.34 0.40 0.39 0.40 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.31 0.33 0.35
2005 0.36 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.41 0.43 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.21 0.26 0.35
2006 0.27 0.36 0.34 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.37 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.37 0.34
2007 0.38 0.36 0.41 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.41 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.38 0.37
2008 0.36 0.36 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.33 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.35 0.36 0.38 0.36
2009 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.39 0.31 0.34 0.23 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.29
2010 0.35 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.40 0.38 0.41 0.39
2011 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.50 0.44
2012 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.45 0.47 0.49 0.45 0.41 0.40 0.36 0.34 0.38 0.42
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐4.09%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.42 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.01
2015 0.42 Feb 1.03 Aug 1.01
2020 0.42 Mar 1.04 Sep 0.98
2030 0.42 Apr 1.03 Oct 0.93
2040 0.42 May 1.01 Nov 0.94
2050 0.42 Jun 1.03 Dec 1.00
2060 0.42
‐‐Non‐Metallic Mineral Product Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐46a Category Industrial
Entity Performance Fibers, Inc Type Return
Facility Salisbury Facility Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.64 1.54 1.53 1.62 1.45 1.45 1.59 1.51 1.54 1.57
2002 1.29 1.16 1.06 0.94 0.96 1.05 1.14 0.81 0.91 1.01 1.13 1.14 1.05
2003 1.00 1.12 1.13 1.22 0.99 1.01 0.82 1.05 1.21 0.96 0.92 1.08 1.04
2004 0.97 1.09 1.12 1.12 1.12 0.97 1.07 1.15 1.38 1.15 1.09 1.04 1.11
2005 0.83 0.89 0.90 0.75 0.72 0.97 0.79 0.87 0.70 0.63 0.69 0.73 0.79
2006 0.66 0.71 0.69 0.65 0.61 0.72 0.52 0.59 0.51 0.43 0.60 0.44 0.59
2007 0.48 0.40 0.51 0.43 0.41 0.44 0.46 0.43 0.44 0.49 0.40 0.47 0.45
2008 0.51 0.47 0.53 0.56 0.48 0.39 0.60 0.55 0.58 0.44 0.50 0.48 0.51
2009 0.34 0.37 0.57 0.42 0.42 0.58 0.33 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.57 0.48 0.43
2010 0.24 0.50 0.39 0.29 0.57 0.48 0.37 0.38 0.29 0.37 0.33 0.31 0.38
2011 0.33 0.35 0.40 0.38 0.41 0.37 0.60 0.44 0.53 0.39 0.48 0.39 0.42
2012 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.40 0.49 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.42 0.33 0.22 0.28 0.36
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐6.47%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.39 Jan 0.87 Jul 1.08
2015 0.39 Feb 0.96 Aug 1.02
2020 0.39 Mar 1.07 Sep 1.04
2030 0.39 Apr 0.97 Oct 0.93
2040 0.39 May 1.09 Nov 0.98
2050 0.39 Jun 1.03 Dec 0.95
2060 0.39
‐‐Textile Mills and Textile Product Mills sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWH‐46b Category Industrial
Entity Performance Fibers, Inc Type Withdrawal
Facility Salisbury Facility Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 0.66 0.62 0.74 0.82 0.90 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.72 0.60 0.67 0.51 0.74
2009 0.62 0.63 0.57 0.41 0.41 0.54 0.55 0.51 0.47 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.49
2010 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.53 0.54 0.52 0.42 0.44 0.34 0.41
2011 0.35 0.41 0.45 0.48 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.39 0.36 0.30 0.45
2012 0.35 0.37 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.46 0.58 0.48 0.46 0.36 0.29 0.27 0.41
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐6.47%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.42 Jan 0.95 Jul 1.24
2015 0.42 Feb 0.97 Aug 1.19
2020 0.42 Mar 1.04 Sep 1.06
2030 0.42 Apr 0.99 Oct 0.88
2040 0.42 May 0.99 Nov 0.86
2050 0.42 Jun 1.11 Dec 0.72
2060 0.42
‐‐Textile Mills and Textile Product Mills sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWB‐55 Category Industrial
Entity Teledyne Allvac Type Withdrawal
Facility Monroe Plant Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2009 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
2010 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
2011 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
2012 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐0.40%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 2.00 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 2.00 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 2.00 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 2.00 Apr 1.00 Oct 1.00
2040 2.00 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 2.00 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 2.00
‐‐Primary Metal Manufacturing sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWB‐56 Category Industrial
Entity The Fork, LLC Type Withdrawal
Facility The Fork, LLC Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.80 1.80 ‐‐ 0.30
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐2.02%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.30 Jan ‐‐ Jul ‐‐
2015 0.30 Feb ‐‐ Aug ‐‐
2020 0.30 Mar ‐‐ Sep ‐‐
2030 0.30 Apr ‐‐ Oct 5.99
2040 0.30 May ‐‐ Nov 5.99
2050 0.30 Jun ‐‐ Dec ‐‐
2060 0.30
‐‐Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWH‐74a Category Industrial
Entity True Textiles, Inc Type Withdrawal
Facility True Elkin, Inc. Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 1.31 0.80 0.93 0.92 1.01 0.98 0.90 1.16 1.21 1.10 1.20 1.00 1.04
2008 0.79 0.83 0.67 0.70 0.77 0.83 0.91 0.82 0.87 0.91 0.77 0.82 0.81
2009 0.74 0.56 0.50 0.53 0.43 0.48 0.48 0.40 0.33 0.22 0.20 0.16 0.42
2010 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.31 0.17
2011 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.18 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.14
2012 0.17 0.16 0.19 0.18 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.16
Data Source: Water Withdrawal Registration Program database; Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 17, 2014 (file dated Feb 17, 2014)
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐6.47%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.16 Jan 1.23 Jul 1.01
2015 0.16 Feb 0.95 Aug 1.05
2020 0.16 Mar 0.94 Sep 1.03
2030 0.16 Apr 0.96 Oct 0.96
2040 0.16 May 0.97 Nov 0.92
2050 0.16 Jun 1.00 Dec 0.95
2060 0.16
‐‐Textile Mills and Textile Product Mills sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐74b Category Industrial
Entity True Textiles, Inc Type Return
Facility 304 East Main Street Plant Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.07 1.32 1.74 1.30 1.83 2.48 2.25 2.40 1.44 1.24 0.80 0.74 1.55
2002 0.53 0.60 0.59 0.63 0.75 0.93 0.92 0.90 0.71 0.77 0.76 0.68 0.73
2003 0.83 0.79 0.82 0.86 0.97 1.08 1.21 1.08 0.89 1.11 0.99 0.97 0.97
2004 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.89 1.01 1.31 1.06 0.96 1.02 0.96 1.09 1.06 0.99
2005 1.08 1.03 0.97 0.85 0.88 1.08 1.09 1.38 1.32 1.49 1.28 1.05 1.12
2006 0.80 0.77 0.94 0.84 0.87 1.06 1.19 1.38 1.41 1.26 1.31 1.15 1.08
2007 1.29 0.84 0.93 0.89 0.87 0.88 0.79 0.83 0.78 0.79 0.73 0.67 0.86
2008 0.61 0.55 0.42 0.48 0.50 0.63 0.66 0.57 0.56 0.47 0.35 0.43 0.52
2009 0.46 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.28 0.30 0.33 0.26 0.17 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.26
2010 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.18 0.09
2011 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.08
2012 0.07 0.06 0.10 0.07 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐6.47%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.09 Jan 1.39 Jul 1.08
2015 0.09 Feb 1.02 Aug 1.04
2020 0.09 Mar 1.01 Sep 0.93
2030 0.09 Apr 1.01 Oct 0.84
2040 0.09 May 1.02 Nov 0.74
2050 0.09 Jun 1.10 Dec 0.83
2060 0.09
‐‐Textile Mills and Textile Product Mills sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐75 Category Industrial
Entity Tyson Foods, Inc Type Return
Facility Harmony Plant Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.20
2002 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.12 0.18 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.17
2003 0.18 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.32 0.25 0.18 0.23 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.20
2004 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.17
2005 0.16 0.21 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.17
2006 0.20 0.18 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.19 0.18 0.15
2007 0.17 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.18 0.15
2008 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.18 0.16
2009 0.19 0.17 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.17
2010 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.18 0.12 0.15 0.14 0.18 0.16 0.16
2011 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.15
2012 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.13 0.14 0.14
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 1.17%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP 1.17%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.15 Jan 1.13 Jul 0.92
2015 0.16 Feb 1.09 Aug 0.89
2020 0.16 Mar 0.99 Sep 1.01
2030 0.18 Apr 0.87 Oct 1.04
2040 0.21 May 1.01 Nov 1.08
2050 0.23 Jun 0.94 Dec 1.02
2060 0.26
‐‐Food and Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing sector GSP for North Carolina was applied.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐78 Category Industrial
Entity Wayne Farms LLC Bruckie Ashburn Type Return
Facility Dobson Plant Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.52 0.48 0.45 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.49 0.45 0.43 0.40 0.34 0.46 0.46
2002 0.48 0.50 0.51 0.60 0.55 0.59 0.59 0.60 0.59 0.58 0.54 0.50 0.55
2003 0.56 0.54 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.54 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.55 0.49 0.54
2004 0.61 0.57 0.55 0.63 0.47 0.43 0.34 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.46
2005 0.40 0.42 0.41 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.39 0.38 0.39 0.37 0.39 0.41
2006 0.41 0.40 0.41 0.44 0.42 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.40 0.43 0.42 0.37 0.42
2007 0.40 0.38 0.39 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.42 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.42
2008 0.40 0.23 0.29 0.41 0.33 0.23 0.34 0.39 0.37 0.37 0.35 0.27 0.33
2009 0.32 0.27 0.31 0.34 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.31 0.34
2010 0.33 0.31 0.34 0.32 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.35 0.37
2011 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.40
2012 0.36 0.35 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.43 0.41 0.48 0.44 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.41
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐3.49%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.39 Jan 0.96 Jul 1.06
2015 0.39 Feb 0.84 Aug 1.11
2020 0.39 Mar 0.93 Sep 1.08
2030 0.39 Apr 0.99 Oct 1.04
2040 0.39 May 1.03 Nov 0.99
2050 0.39 Jun 1.00 Dec 0.96
2060 0.39
‐‐Crop and Animal Production (Farms) sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRB‐83 Category Industrial
Entity Carolina Stalite Company Type Return
Facility Carolina Stalite Company Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.90 1.06 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.33 0.30 0.37 1.55 0.97 0.73 0.75 0.82
2002 0.24 0.89 0.98 0.21 1.05 ND 0.21 0.29 0.43 0.34 0.44 0.30 0.49
2003 0.26 0.31 0.60 0.66 0.62 0.75 0.53 0.35 0.35 0.18 0.35 0.40 0.45
2004 0.30 0.57 ND 0.56 0.46 0.05 0.45 0.11 1.59 0.80 0.97 0.90 0.61
2005 0.51 0.82 0.83 0.63 0.29 0.51 0.53 0.77 0.32 0.64 0.40 1.13 0.61
2006 0.77 0.48 0.56 0.56 ND 0.92 0.18 0.27 0.35 0.26 0.31 0.40 0.46
2007 1.26 0.71 0.46 1.26 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.06 0.50 0.08 0.47
2008 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.29 0.30 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.26 0.30 0.21 0.35 0.18
2009 0.44 0.24 0.26 0.30 0.09 0.05 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.17
2010 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.15
2011 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.08 0.27 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.27 0.20 0.15 0.14
2012 0.16 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.12 ND 0.08 0.07 ND 0.10
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.13 Jan 1.82 Jul 0.51
2015 0.13 Feb 1.20 Aug 0.54
2020 0.13 Mar 1.04 Sep 0.73
2030 0.13 Apr 1.84 Oct 0.76
2040 0.13 May 1.13 Nov 1.00
2050 0.13 Jun 0.76 Dec 0.79
2060 0.13
‐‐Mining (except oil and gas) sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRH‐85 Category Industrial
Entity Norfolk Southern Railway Company Type Return
Facility Linwood Yard Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.10 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.07
2002 0.14 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 ND 0.33 0.13 0.23 0.20 0.11
2003 0.15 0.23 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.22 0.16 0.20 0.22 0.10 0.20 0.21 0.19
2004 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.22 ND 0.20 0.18
2005 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.19 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.10
2006 0.03 0.05 ND ND 0.22 0.16 0.21 0.14 0.21 0.16 0.20 ND 0.15
2007 0.21 0.11 0.18 0.20 ND 0.23 ND ND ND 0.15 0.21 ND 0.18
2008 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.23 0.21 ND 0.20 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.30 0.24
2009 0.20 0.27 0.21 0.28 ND 0.19 ND 0.26 ND 0.16 0.22 0.27 0.23
2010 0.28 0.26 0.23 ND 0.28 0.21 0.23 0.26 ND 0.24 0.18 0.15 0.23
2011 0.26 0.29 0.23 0.28 0.31 0.16 0.24 ND 0.31 0.26 0.27 0.23 0.26
2012 ND 0.20 0.23 ND 0.29 0.24 ND 0.28 ND 0.21 ND ND 0.24
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐0.58%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.24 Jan 1.05 Jul 0.97
2015 0.24 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.21
2020 0.24 Mar 0.94 Sep 1.22
2030 0.24 Apr 1.06 Oct 0.89
2040 0.24 May 1.18 Nov 0.93
2050 0.24 Jun 0.89 Dec 1.02
2060 0.24
‐‐Rail Transportation sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NRD‐92 Category Industrial
Entity Burlington Industries LLC Type Return
Facility Richmond Plant Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 0.52 0.50 0.57 0.53 0.56 0.53 0.50 0.62 0.58 0.59 0.58 0.43 0.54
2002 0.43 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.42 0.40 0.44 0.50 0.64 0.60 0.50 0.34 0.50
2003 0.43 0.52 0.48 0.45 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.46 0.51 0.59 0.47 0.35 0.46
2004 0.40 0.38 0.47 0.43 0.46 0.43 0.44 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.38 0.27 0.42
2005 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.47 0.50 0.59 0.49 0.57 0.54 0.48 0.43 0.39 0.48
2006 0.37 0.48 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.38 0.36 0.30 0.31 0.29 0.40
2007 0.36 0.35 0.36 0.35 0.39 0.37 0.25 0.36 0.38 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.33
2008 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.25 0.28 0.24 0.23 0.19 0.13 0.25
2009 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.23 0.27 0.21 0.33 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.21 0.24
2010 0.19 0.23 0.29 0.30 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.32 0.29 0.21 0.20 0.14 0.26
2011 0.19 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.23 0.34 0.23 0.23 0.25 0.18 0.26
2012 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.22 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.29 0.29 0.24 0.20 0.16 0.24
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐6.47%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 0.25 Jan 0.89 Jul 0.95
2015 0.25 Feb 0.98 Aug 1.22
2020 0.25 Mar 0.99 Sep 1.07
2030 0.25 Apr 1.08 Oct 0.92
2040 0.25 May 1.20 Nov 0.87
2050 0.25 Jun 1.16 Dec 0.67
2060 0.25
‐‐Textile sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWD‐94a Category Industrial
Entity B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Type Withdrawal
Facility Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 1) Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.14
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.75 1.74
2009 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11
2010 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08
2011 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84
2012 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 1.44 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 1.44 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 1.44 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 1.44 Apr 1.00 Oct 0.99
2040 1.44 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 1.44 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 1.44
‐‐Mining sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWD‐94b Category Industrial
Entity B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Type Withdrawal
Facility Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 3) Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.14
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.65 1.72 1.72 1.71
2009 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07 2.07
2010 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.04
2011 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80
2012 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 1.41 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 1.41 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 1.41 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 1.41 Apr 1.00 Oct 0.99
2040 1.41 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 1.41 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 1.41
‐‐Mining sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
ID No. NWD‐94c Category Industrial
Entity B.V. Hedrick Gravel And Sand Co. Type Withdrawal
Facility Hedrick Mine (Pump House ‐ 4) Sub‐basin Downstream Of Blewett Falls Lake (Nc)
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.14
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2006 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2007 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2008 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.75 1.74
2009 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11
2010 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08
2011 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84 1.84
2012 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39
Data Source: NPDES database; Jennifer Smith at NCDENR‐DWR; received April 22, 2014
PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS
Industrial Sector Information
Industrial Sector ‐‐ State GSP 2.52% Applied AGR 0.00%
SIC Code ‐‐ Sector GSP ‐11.81%
NAICS Code ‐‐ Inflation ‐‐
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
Base 1.44 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 1.44 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 1.44 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 1.44 Apr 1.00 Oct 0.99
2040 1.44 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 1.44 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 1.44
‐‐Mining sector GSP value for North Carolina was negative, so an AGR of zero was applied to be conservative.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Base Year's projected flowrate is based on 2010‐2012 Average.
Agriculture and Irrigation Projection Sheet Table of Contents
Page No. Basin ID No. Entity Facility
1 AI (CGL) Rollup Crop and Livestock Flows Summarized by Basin All
A/I Projection TOC 1 of 1
Agriculture/Irrigation (Crop, Livestock, and Golf Course) Rollup Summary
Historical (MGD) Projected (MGD)
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.51
23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60 23.60
0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49
0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80
11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52 11.52
1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99
Monthly Coefficients
Month Coefficient
Annual 1.00
Jan 0.04
Feb 0.07
Mar 0.25
Apr 0.65
May 1.27
Jun 2.32
Jul 2.88
Aug 2.38
Sep 1.39
Oct 0.54
Nov 0.14
Dec 0.05
Annual 1.00 <‐‐ for use in Monthly Summary worksheet
Draft Projections 1 of 47 12/11/2014
Table of Contents for
Thermo‐Electric Power Projection Sheets
Page No. Basin ID No. Entity Facility1 TEP Summary Summary of Projections All Basins2 NNH‐30a Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Buck Steam Station3 NNH‐30b Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Buck Combined Cycle Station4 NNB‐30c Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Smith Energy Complex5 NNH‐30d Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Combined Cycle Station #16 NNH‐30e Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Combined Cycle Station #27 NNH‐30f Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Nuclear Plant #18 NNH‐30g Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Additional Nuclear Plant #2
Power Projections TOC
New Future Power
Basin Projected (MGD)
ID Facility Name Category Base 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
NNH‐30a Buck Steam Station High Rock Lake TEP ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
NNH‐30b Buck Combined Cycle Station High Rock Lake TEP 0.25 2.49 2.49 2.49 2.49 2.49 2.49
NNB‐30c Smith Energy Complex Blewett Falls Lake TEP 4.18 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
NNH‐30d Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 High Rock Lake TEP ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.49 2.49 2.49 2.49 2.49
NNH‐30e Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 High Rock Lake TEP ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.49 2.49
NNH‐30f Additional Nuclear Plant #1 Blewett Falls Lake TEP ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 32.16 32.16
NNH‐30g Additional Nuclear Plant #2 Lake Tillery TEP ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 32.16 32.16
Draft Projections 1 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30a Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Buck Steam Station Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 1.14 1.70 1.64 1.95 1.58 2.21 2.58 2.34 1.76 1.30 1.58 1.39 1.76
2002 1.14 1.70 1.64 1.95 1.58 2.21 2.58 2.34 1.76 1.30 1.58 1.39 1.76
2003 1.14 1.70 1.64 1.95 1.58 2.21 2.58 2.34 1.76 1.30 1.58 1.39 1.76
2004 1.14 1.70 1.64 1.95 1.58 2.21 2.58 2.34 1.76 1.30 1.58 1.39 1.76
2005 1.14 1.64 1.70 1.73 1.52 1.83 2.50 3.04 2.75 1.67 0.64 1.88 1.84
2006 0.36 1.70 2.00 2.43 0.46 2.54 2.72 2.70 0.98 1.27 2.49 0.97 1.72
2007 0.76 2.34 1.46 1.87 2.26 2.22 2.79 1.89 2.26 2.07 2.65 1.86 2.03
2008 2.31 1.12 1.38 1.77 2.07 2.25 2.29 1.71 1.04 0.18 0.53 0.84 1.46
2009 1.09 0.56 0.38 0.37 0.12 1.00 0.21 0.92 0.40 0.07 ‐‐ 0.34 0.45
2010 1.33 1.29 0.76 1.09 1.46 1.91 2.29 2.09 1.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.10 1.22
2011 1.60 0.26 0.27 0.48 1.05 1.18 1.44 1.68 0.21 0.11 0.06 ‐‐ 0.70
2012 ‐‐ 0.28 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.20 0.34 0.92 0.28 0.08 0.11 0.67 0.17 0.25
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 1.16 Jul 1.63
2015 ‐‐ Feb 0.96 Aug 1.40
2020 ‐‐ Mar 0.70 Sep 0.86
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.91 Oct 0.41
2040 ‐‐ May 1.17 Nov 0.64
2050 ‐‐ Jun 1.45 Dec 0.70
2060 ‐‐
‐‐
NOTE: Per email from Ed Bruce received on May 21, 2014, all flow data for Buck Combined Cycle Station was included in the historical data for Buck Steam Station. Therefore historical flows for both facilities are
included on this sheet. See entity sheet NNH‐30b for the Buck Combined Cycle Station projected data.
Historical data were unavailable for 1997‐2004, so flows for those years were approximated using the average flows from 2005‐2008 for each respective month.
This facility was replaced by the Buck Combined Cycle Station and therefore is inactive and has zero projected flows.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Draft Projections 2 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30b Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Buck Combined Cycle Station Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note See Note ND
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 0.25 Jan 0.91 Jul 1.15
2015 2.49 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.16
2020 2.49 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.10
2030 2.49 Apr 1.01 Oct 0.96
2040 2.49 May 1.02 Nov 0.82
2050 2.49 Jun 1.10 Dec 0.76
2060 2.49
Monthly Coefficients are calculated based on 2015 projected monthly net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
NOTE: Per email from Ed Bruce received on May 21, 2014, all flow data for Buck Combined Cycle Station was included in the historical data for Buck Steam Station. See entity sheet NNH‐30a for the combined flow
data.
Projected net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Draft Projections 3 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNB‐30c Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Smith Energy Complex Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2003 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2004 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.43 1.48 1.05 0.24 0.04 0.63 0.81
2006 ‐‐ 0.05 0.65 0.18 0.46 0.80 1.44 1.80 0.67 0.44 0.31 0.40 0.61
2007 0.54 0.87 0.59 0.90 0.59 1.34 1.31 1.87 1.50 0.14 0.08 0.38 0.84
2008 0.83 0.26 0.46 0.00 0.00 1.52 1.28 1.86 1.11 1.56 0.86 0.92 0.89
2009 0.83 1.01 1.61 0.47 0.84 1.27 1.47 2.10 1.97 0.61 1.59 1.05 1.24
2010 1.07 1.41 1.59 0.72 1.92 2.06 2.04 2.05 1.62 1.87 1.80 1.65 1.65
2011 0.83 1.67 2.14 1.67 3.33 4.75 5.07 4.54 4.33 3.68 3.24 4.26 3.30
2012 3.75 4.64 4.72 4.05 4.07 4.48 5.39 5.32 4.19 2.72 2.79 4.07 4.18
Data Sources: Richmond County WTP Historical Data; Harold Walton, Richmond County WTP Superintendent; received June 19, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 4.18 Jan 1.00 Jul 1.00
2015 6.00 Feb 1.00 Aug 1.00
2020 6.00 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.00
2030 6.00 Apr 1.00 Oct 1.00
2040 6.00 May 1.00 Nov 1.00
2050 6.00 Jun 1.00 Dec 1.00
2060 6.00
‐‐
Smith Energy Complex receives wholesale water from Richmond County WTP (both raw and potable). Raw water flows are shown above, while potable flows are included on the Richmond County WTP facility sheet
(see entity sheet NWB‐88). The Smith Energy Complex does not discharge back into the project area. Therefore all withdrawals shown above are net withdrawals.
Smith Energy Complex began operations in 2000. No data was provided for Jan 2000 through Jun 2005. For Jul 2005 through Dec 2012, data was provided by Richmond County. For modeling purposes, Jan 2000
through Jun 2005 flows were assumed to be equal to the 2006‐2008 average flows (first 3 full years on record) for each respective month.
Except for the 2012 flow value, projections shown below were provided by Ed Bruce at Duke Energy, received May 21, 2014. The 2012 flow value is taken from historical data above.
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
Draft Projections 4 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30d Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Additional Combined Cycle Station #1 Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 0.91 Jul 1.15
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.00 Aug 1.16
2020 2.49 Mar 1.00 Sep 1.10
2030 2.49 Apr 1.01 Oct 0.96
2040 2.49 May 1.02 Nov 0.82
2050 2.49 Jun 1.10 Dec 0.76
2060 2.49
Station included to account for future additional water required to meet long‐range energy demand."
See Note Below.
Per Ed Bruce at Duke Energy: "Duke Energy does not have specific plans to build a new power plant at this location. This is a hypothetical plant identical to the existing Buck Combined Cycle
Projected net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
Monthly Coefficients are calculated based on 2020 projected monthly net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
‐‐
Draft Projections 5 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30e Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Additional Combined Cycle Station #2 Sub‐basin High Rock Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 0.91 Jul 1.15
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.00 Aug 1.16
2020 ‐‐ Mar 1.00 Sep 1.10
2030 ‐‐ Apr 1.01 Oct 0.96
2040 ‐‐ May 1.02 Nov 0.82
2050 2.49 Jun 1.10 Dec 0.76
2060 2.49
Station included to account for future additional water required to meet long‐range energy demand."
See Note Below.
‐‐Per Ed Bruce at Duke Energy: "Duke Energy does not have specific plans to build a new power plant at this location. This is a hypothetical plant identical to the existing Buck Combined Cycle
Projected net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
Monthly Coefficients are calculated based on 2050 projected monthly net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
‐‐
Draft Projections 6 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30f Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Additional Nuclear Plant #1 Sub‐basin Blewett Falls Lake
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 1.09 Jul 1.10
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.04 Aug 1.10
2020 ‐‐ Mar 0.93 Sep 1.01
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.91 Oct 0.95
2040 ‐‐ May 0.91 Nov 0.93
2050 32.16 Jun 1.04 Dec 0.98
2060 32.16
Catawba Nuclear Station included to account for future additional water required to meet long‐range energy demand."
See Note Below.
‐‐Per Ed Bruce at Duke Energy: "Duke Energy does not have specific plans to build a new power plant at this location. This is a hypothetical plant with similar consumptive water use to
Projected net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
Monthly Coefficients are calculated based on 2050 projected monthly net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
‐‐
Draft Projections 7 of 8 12/11/2014
ID No. NNH‐30g Category Power
Entity Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Type Net Withdrawal
Facility Additional Nuclear Plant #2 Sub‐basin Lake Tillery
Contact Harold Brady at NCDENR‐DWR IBT? ‐‐
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY
Flow Rate Data (MGD)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Avg
1997 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2002 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2003 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2004 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2005 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2006 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2007 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2008 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2009 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2010 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2011 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2012 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Data Source: Duke Energy Historical Data; Ed Bruce at Duke Energy; received May 21, 2014
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROJECTIONS ASSUMPTIONS
Analysis and Projections Notes
PROJECTIONS SUMMARY
Annual Average Flow Monthly Coefficients
Year Flow (mgd) Month Coefficient Month Coefficient
2012 ‐‐ Jan 1.09 Jul 1.10
2015 ‐‐ Feb 1.04 Aug 1.10
2020 ‐‐ Mar 0.93 Sep 1.01
2030 ‐‐ Apr 0.91 Oct 0.95
2040 ‐‐ May 0.91 Nov 0.93
2050 32.16 Jun 1.04 Dec 0.98
2060 32.16
Catawba Nuclear Station included to account for future additional water required to meet long‐range energy demand."
See Note Below.
‐‐Per Ed Bruce at Duke Energy: "Duke Energy does not have specific plans to build a new power plant at this location. This is a hypothetical plant with similar consumptive water use to
Projected net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
Monthly Coefficients are calculated based on 2050 projected monthly net withdrawals provided by Duke Energy.
‐‐
Draft Projections 8 of 8 12/11/2014
CD-4.6 APPENDIX CD – 4.6
Yadkin Water Supply
Analysis – Union County
Projection Inputs by
YRWSP Alternative
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐ 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐ 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐ 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐ 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐ 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 16.47
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.47
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.47
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 18.82
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 18.82
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 18.82
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 18.82
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 18.82
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension completed by assuming 1.8% AGR but no service area expansion.
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 1)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 18.82
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 2A)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 18.82
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 2B)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.72 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 0.91 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 1.23 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 1.56 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 1.91 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 2.27 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 2.65 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 3.04 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 3.44 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 3.85 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.06 4.25 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 0.38 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 0.82 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 1.28 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 1.75 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 2.23 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 2.74 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 3.25 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 3.79 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 4.25 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 4.72 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.76 5.20 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 0.99 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 1.51 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 2.03 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 2.57 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 3.13 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 3.70 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 4.28 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 4.65 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 5.06 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 5.47 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.47 5.88 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 3.94 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 4.35 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 4.76 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 5.24 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 5.71 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.82 6.12 ‐‐
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 3)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 18.82
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 4)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.65 16.49
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.48
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.46
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.35 18.83
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.76 18.85
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.24 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.71 18.80
‐‐ ‐‐ 6.12 18.84
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply ‐
Rocky River (mgd)
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 5)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ 7.96 ‐‐
‐‐ 8.29 ‐‐
‐‐ 8.62 ‐‐
‐‐ 8.97 ‐‐
‐‐ 9.33 ‐‐
‐‐ 9.71 ‐‐
‐‐ 10.09 ‐‐
‐‐ 10.50 ‐‐
‐‐ 10.91 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.31 ‐‐
‐‐ 11.72 ‐‐
‐‐ 12.15 ‐‐
‐‐ 12.59 ‐‐
‐‐ 13.04 ‐‐
‐‐ 13.51 ‐‐
‐‐ 14.00 ‐‐
‐‐ 14.50 ‐‐
‐‐ 15.02 ‐‐
‐‐ 15.56 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.01 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.48 ‐‐
‐‐ 16.97 ‐‐
‐‐ 17.47 ‐‐
‐‐ 17.98 ‐‐
‐‐ 18.50 ‐‐
‐‐ 19.04 ‐‐
‐‐ 19.60 ‐‐
‐‐ 20.17 ‐‐
‐‐ 20.75 ‐‐
‐‐ 21.12 ‐‐
‐‐ 21.53 ‐‐
‐‐ 21.94 ‐‐
‐‐ 22.35 ‐‐
‐‐ 22.76 ‐‐
‐‐ 23.18 ‐‐
‐‐ 23.59 ‐‐
‐‐ 24.06 ‐‐
‐‐ 24.53 ‐‐
‐‐ 24.94 ‐‐
CRWTP/CMUD
(Catawba IBT)
Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 6)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 7.96 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 8.29 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 8.62 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 8.97 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 9.33 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 9.71 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 10.09 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 10.50 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 10.91 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 11.31 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 12.15 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 12.59 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 13.04 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 13.51 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 14.00 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 14.50 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 15.02 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 15.56 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 16.01 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 16.48 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 16.97 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 17.47 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 17.98 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 18.50 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 19.04 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 19.60 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 20.17 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 20.75 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 21.12 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 21.53 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 21.94 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 22.35 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 22.76 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 23.18 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 23.59 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 24.06 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 24.53 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 24.94 ‐‐
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 7)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP/CMUD
(Catawba IBT)
Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
2010 4.90 1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
2011 5.10 1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
2012 5.30 1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
2013 5.52 1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2014 5.76 2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2015 6.00 2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2016 6.25 2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2017 6.51 2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2018 6.78 2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2019 7.06 2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2020 7.35 2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2021 7.65 2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
2022 7.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 ‐‐
2023 8.29 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 ‐‐
2024 8.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 ‐‐
2025 8.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 ‐‐
2026 9.33 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 ‐‐
2027 9.71 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 ‐‐
2028 10.09 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 ‐‐
2029 10.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 ‐‐
2030 10.91 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 ‐‐
2031 11.31 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2032 11.72 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
2033 12.15 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ‐‐
2034 12.59 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 ‐‐
2035 13.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 ‐‐
2036 13.51 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 ‐‐
2037 14.00 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 ‐‐
2038 14.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 ‐‐
2039 15.02 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 ‐‐
2040 15.56 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 ‐‐
2041 16.01 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 ‐‐
2042 16.48 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 ‐‐
2043 16.97 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 ‐‐
2044 17.47 ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 ‐‐
2045 17.98 ‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 ‐‐
2046 18.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 ‐‐
2047 19.04 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 ‐‐
2048 19.60 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 ‐‐
2049 20.17 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 ‐‐
2050 20.75 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 ‐‐
2051 21.14 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 ‐‐
2052 21.54 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 ‐‐
2053 21.94 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 ‐‐
2054 22.35 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 ‐‐
2055 22.76 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 ‐‐
2056 23.19 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 ‐‐
2057 23.62 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 ‐‐
2058 24.06 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 ‐‐
2059 24.50 ‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 ‐‐
2060 24.96 ‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 ‐‐
Notes:
1. All projections are in million gallons per day (mgd) on an annual average daily value basis.
2. 2051 to 2060 projections have been extended from originally developed YRWSP projections; extension com
Water Supply Projections (Baseline)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
Planning
Year
Union County ‐
Yadkin Service
Area Water
Demand
Projection (mgd)
1.76 ‐‐ 3.18 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.34 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.54 ‐‐
1.76 ‐‐ 3.76 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.41 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.65 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 3.90 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.16 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.43 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 4.71 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.00 ‐‐
2.35 ‐‐ 5.30 ‐‐
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.23 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.56 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.91 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.27 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.65 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.04 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.44 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.85 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 7.06
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 11.72
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.82 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.28 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.75 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.23 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.74 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.79 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.25 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.72 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.20 11.76
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.99 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 1.51 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.03 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 2.57 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.13 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.70 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.28 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.67 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.06 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.47 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.88 16.47
‐‐ ‐‐ 3.94 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.36 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 4.80 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.23 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 5.68 18.82
‐‐ ‐‐ 6.14 18.82
Water Supply Projections (Alternative 11)
Anson County
Treated Supply
(mgd)
Anson County Raw
Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba
IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply
(mgd)
--
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Wat
er
Flo
w (
mgd
; an
nu
al a
vera
ge d
ay)
Projection Year
Union County Yadkin Basin Water Demand & Supply - Alternatives 1, 2 & 4
Union County - Yadkin Service Area Water Demand Projection (mgd) Anson County Treated Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba IBT) Supply (mgd) YRWSP Supply (mgd)
--
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060Wat
er
Flo
w (
mgd
; an
nu
al a
vera
ge d
ay)
Projection Year
Union County Yadkin Basin Water Demand & Supply- Alternative 3
Union County - Yadkin Service Area Water Demand Projection (mgd)
Anson County Treated Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply (mgd)
--
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Wat
er
Flo
w (
mgd
; an
nu
al a
vera
ge d
ay)
Projection Year
Union County Yadkin Basin Water Demand & Supply - Alternative 5
Union County - Yadkin Service Area Water Demand Projection (mgd) Anson County Treated Supply (mgd)
CRWTP (Catawba IBT) Supply (mgd) YRWSP Supply - Rocky River (mgd)
--
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060Wat
er
Flo
w (
mgd
; an
nu
al a
vera
ge d
ay)
Projection Year
Union County Yadkin Basin Water Demand & Supply - Alternatives 6 & 7
Union County - Yadkin Service Area Water Demand Projection (mgd)
Anson County Treated Supply (mgd)
CRWTP/CMUD (Catawba IBT) Supply (mgd)
YRWSP Supply (mgd)
Crooked Creek
WRF2
Monroe WWTP ‐
UCPW Capacity3
2010 1.0 1.0
2011 1.0 1.1
2012 1.0 1.2
2013 1.0 1.3
2014 1.1 1.4
2015 1.1 1.5
2016 1.2 1.6
2017 1.2 1.7
2018 1.3 1.9
2019 1.4 2.0
2020 1.5 2.1
2021 1.5 2.2
2022 1.5 2.4
2023 1.5 2.5
2024 1.5 2.6
2025 1.5 2.8
2026 1.5 2.9
2027 1.5 3.0
2028 1.5 3.2
2029 1.5 3.3
2030 1.5 3.4
2031 1.5 3.6
2032 1.5 3.7
2033 1.5 3.8
2034 1.5 4.0
2035 1.5 4.1
2036 1.5 4.2
2037 1.5 4.3 Notes:
2038 1.5 4.5 1. Wastewater flow projections are in units of million gallons per day, on an average annual daily basis.
2039 1.5 4.6
2040 1.5 4.7
2041 1.5 4.9
2042 1.5 5.1
2043 1.5 5.3
2044 1.5 5.5
2045 1.5 5.6
2046 1.5 5.8
2047 1.5 6.0
2048 1.5 6.2
2049 1.5 6.4
2050 1.5 6.6
2051 1.5 6.7
2052 1.5 6.8
2053 1.5 6.9
2054 1.5 7.0
2055 1.5 7.1
2056 1.5 7.2
2057 1.5 7.3
2058 1.5 7.4
2059 1.5 7.5
2060 1.5 7.6
4. Projections for other small wastewater treatment facilities in Union County's Yadkin Basin service area (Grassy Branch WWTP, Olde Sycamore
WWTP, and Tallwood WWTP) have not been included in these projections as they are small package plant facilities.
Planning
Year
Wastewater Flow Projections in
Yadkin Service Area (mgd)1
2. Crooked Creek WRF capacity is 1.9 MGD (max month capacity; = 1.5 MGD average day capacity); once Crooked Creek WRF capacity is reached,
flow is assumed to be scalped to Poplin Road Pump Station and diverted to Twelve Mile WRF (Catawba Basin), per Master Plan.
3. Monroe WWTP values shown are for Union County Public Works flow to City of Monroe's WWTP and do not include Monroe, Marshville or
Wingate flows.
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Wastewater Flow (mgd; annual average day)
Projection Year
Union County Yadkin Basin Wastewater Return Projections
Crooked Creek WRF Monroe WWTP ‐ UCPW Capacity