nonuniformities in the angle of repose and packing...

2
Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing Fraction of Large Heaps of Granular Particles: Supplementary Material Nikola Topi´ c, 1 Jason A.C. Gallas, 1, 2 and Thorsten P¨ oschel 1, 2 1 Institute for Multiscale Simulations, Friedrich-Alexander-Universit¨ at, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany 2 Departamento de F´ ısica, Universidade Federal da Para´ ıba, 58051-970 Jo˜ ao Pessoa, Brazil THE RATE OF GROWTH OF THE HEAP Let the quantities r, S, h, δ define the geometry of the heap as illustrated in Fig. 1. We wish to find a relation between the angle of repose δ and the change in the area of the flat surface dr/dh of the heap under the simpli- fying assumptions that the heap has constant density, a single angle of repose, grows symmetrically, and that the material added to lateral surface has constant thickness. From Fig. 1 it follows that s = x sin(γ - δ) and Δh = x sin γ so that, eliminating x, we get: s Δh = sin(γ - δ) sin γ . (1) This relation may be also obtained as follows. The con- stant density assumption implies that V = V t +V f , where V denotes the total volume of deposited material at time Δt, V t the volume deposited on the tilted surface, and V f is the volume on the flat surface. When Δt is small, the volume contained between flat and tilted surface be- comes negligible and the particles being deposited end up located either on the flat surface of radius r<S or inside the lateral tilted surface. Since particles are dropped as a homogeneous rain through the area source, the number of particles that fall onto the flat surface of the heap in time Δt is N f = πr 2 F Δt. Here F is the particle flux through the source, i.e. the number of particles that pass through the unit area of the source in unit time. Since the total number of particles passing through the whole source in an interval Δt is N = πS 2 F Δt, we find that the number of particles that end up on the tilted surface is N t = N - N f = π(S 2 - r 2 )F Δt. For constant packing fraction n, N f contributes to the change of Δh, πr 2 F Δt = nπr 2 Δh (2) and N t contributes to s, π(S 2 - r 2 )F Δt = nsπ(L 2 - r 2 )/ cos δ, (3) where π(L 2 - r 2 )/ cos δ is the surface of the frustum. From Eqs. (2) and (3) we obtain s Δh = S 2 - r 2 L 2 - r 2 cos δ. (4) Comparing Eqs. (1) and (4) one readily sees that sin(γ - δ) sin γ = S 2 - r 2 L 2 - r 2 cos δ (5) h r S L h s x Source t t+ t h 0 FIG. 1. Schematic view of a central section of the symmet- rically growing heap, characterized by the h-dependent angle γ γ h , drawn for times t and t t (ticker lines). The ran- dom “rain” of particles originates from a circular source with radius S. For clarity, the distance between the source and the heap was greatly reduced here. FIG. 2. (Color online) The two angles of repose, made visible by three distinct tangent lines to the heap containing 10 × 10 6 particles. The rectangular box on the top indicates the region where particles are dropped from the top. Outside the dropping zone the straight line is tangent to the surface while inside the dropping zone it lies below the surface. Now, using the addition formula for the sin function and the relation L = r + h cot δ extracted from the figure, we obtain: tan γ = (r + h cot δ) 2 - r 2 (r + h cot δ) 2 - S 2 tan δ. (6) Thus, since dr/dh = - cot γ , we obtain a differential

Upload: phungmien

Post on 03-Feb-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing ...inaesp.org/PublicJG/topic_gallas_poeschel_SupMat_LM13409_large... · Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing Fraction

Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing Fraction of Large Heaps ofGranular Particles:

Supplementary Material

Nikola Topic,1 Jason A.C. Gallas,1, 2 and Thorsten Poschel1, 2

1Institute for Multiscale Simulations, Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany2Departamento de Fısica, Universidade Federal da Paraıba, 58051-970 Joao Pessoa, Brazil

THE RATE OF GROWTH OF THE HEAP

Let the quantities r, S, h, δ define the geometry of theheap as illustrated in Fig. 1. We wish to find a relationbetween the angle of repose δ and the change in the areaof the flat surface dr/dh of the heap under the simpli-fying assumptions that the heap has constant density, asingle angle of repose, grows symmetrically, and that thematerial added to lateral surface has constant thickness.

From Fig. 1 it follows that s = x sin(γ − δ) and ∆h =x sin γ so that, eliminating x, we get:

s

∆h=

sin(γ − δ)

sin γ. (1)

This relation may be also obtained as follows. The con-stant density assumption implies that V = Vt+Vf , whereV denotes the total volume of deposited material at time∆t, Vt the volume deposited on the tilted surface, andVf is the volume on the flat surface. When ∆t is small,the volume contained between flat and tilted surface be-comes negligible and the particles being deposited end uplocated either on the flat surface of radius r < S or insidethe lateral tilted surface. Since particles are dropped asa homogeneous rain through the area source, the numberof particles that fall onto the flat surface of the heap intime ∆t is Nf = πr2F∆t. Here F is the particle fluxthrough the source, i.e. the number of particles that passthrough the unit area of the source in unit time. Sincethe total number of particles passing through the wholesource in an interval ∆t is N = πS2F∆t, we find thatthe number of particles that end up on the tilted surfaceis Nt = N −Nf = π(S2 − r2)F∆t.

For constant packing fraction n, Nf contributes to thechange of ∆h,

πr2F∆t = nπr2∆h (2)

and Nt contributes to s,

π(S2 − r2)F∆t = n s π(L2 − r2)/ cos δ , (3)

where π(L2 − r2)/ cos δ is the surface of the frustum.From Eqs. (2) and (3) we obtain

s

∆h=S2 − r2

L2 − r2cos δ. (4)

Comparing Eqs. (1) and (4) one readily sees that

sin(γ − δ)

sin γ=S2 − r2

L2 − r2cos δ (5)

h

r

S

L

���

h�

�s

x

Source

t t+ t�

h

�0

FIG. 1. Schematic view of a central section of the symmet-rically growing heap, characterized by the h-dependent angleγ ≡ γh, drawn for times t and t+ ∆t (ticker lines). The ran-dom “rain” of particles originates from a circular source withradius S. For clarity, the distance between the source and theheap was greatly reduced here.

FIG. 2. (Color online) The two angles of repose, made visibleby three distinct tangent lines to the heap containing 10 ×106 particles. The rectangular box on the top indicates theregion where particles are dropped from the top. Outside thedropping zone the straight line is tangent to the surface whileinside the dropping zone it lies below the surface.

Now, using the addition formula for the sin function andthe relation L = r+ h cot δ extracted from the figure, weobtain:

tan γ =(r + h cot δ)2 − r2

(r + h cot δ)2 − S2tan δ. (6)

Thus, since dr/dh = − cot γ, we obtain a differential

Page 2: Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing ...inaesp.org/PublicJG/topic_gallas_poeschel_SupMat_LM13409_large... · Nonuniformities in the Angle of Repose and Packing Fraction

2

FIG. 3. (Color online) Left: Kitchen sieve used to produce a circular rain of sugar grains. Right: Pile of sugar grains displayingtwo angles of repose. The horizontal green line marks the extension of the rain (dropping zone). For clarity, we show just oneside of the symmetric heap obtained.

equation for r(h), the function describing how the flatsurface shrinks in time:

dr

dh= − (r + h cot δ)2 − S2

(r + h cot δ)2 − r2cot δ. (7)

The proper initial condition is r(h = 0) = S and the neg-ative sign indicates that the area shrinks from its initialvalue. Of course, the solution of Eq. (7) is only physicallymeaningful as long as r(h) ≥ 0.

Figure 2 illustrates the two angles of repose for a pileobtained by numerically depositing 10 × 106 particles.

Lastly, Fig. 3 shows a simple way to demonstrate ex-perimentally the distinct angles of repose. The figureillustrates the pair of angles for a pile obtained from asimple “kitchen table” experiment in which we “rained”about 0.7 kg of ordinary fine grained sugar through an or-dinary kitchen sieve used to spread sugar on cakes, with8 cm of diameter (Fig. 3 left). The result is shown inthe rightmost panel of Fig. 3, where one may distinguishboth angles with the help of the auxiliary lines intendedto guide the eye.