nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to tránverse loads and in...

Upload: phuc-phung

Post on 03-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    1/24

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    2/24

    562 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    Many studies for thermal stress and linear thermal bending of FGM plates are available in the

    literature, see, for example, Refs. [311]. However, investigations in nonlinear analysis of FGM

    plates under thermal or mechanical loading are limited in number. Among those, Mizuguchi and

    Ohnabe [12] employed the Poincare method to examine the large deection of simply supported,heated FGM thin plates with Youngs modulus varying symmetrically to the middle plane in thick-

    ness direction. Based on the rst-order shear deformation plate theory, Praveen and Reddy [13]

    analyzed nonlinear static and dynamic response of functionally graded ceramicmetal plates sub-

    jected to transverse loads and temperature distribution by using nite element method. Reddy [14]

    developed theoretical formulations for thick FGM plates according to the higher-order shear de-

    formation plate theory. In Ref. [14], both Navier solutions for linear bending of simply supported

    rectangular FGM plates and nite element models for nonlinear static and dynamic response were

    presented.

    Geometrically nonlinear bending solutions for homogeneous isotropic and composite laminated

    plates subjected to mechanical and=or thermal loading and resting on an elastic foundation weregiven by Shen [1518]. In these studies the material properties were considered to be independent of

    temperature. Recently, Yang and Shen [19] gave a large deection analysis of thin FGM rectangular

    plates subjected to combined transverse and in-plane loads, but the numerical results were only for

    a simple case of an FGM plate in a xed thermal environment.

    The present paper extends the previous works to the case of FGM plates with two constituent

    materials subjected to a transverse uniform or sinusoidal load and in thermal environments. The

    material properties are assumed to be temperature-dependent, and graded in thickness direction ac-

    cording to a volume fraction power-law distribution. The governing equations of the plate are based

    on Reddys higher-order shear deformation plate theory that includes thermal eects [2023]. A

    mixed Galerkin-perturbation technique is employed to determine the load-deection and load-bending

    moment curves. The numerical illustrations show the nonlinear bending response of FGM plates un-der dierent sets of environmental conditions.

    2. Theoretical development

    Here we consider an FGM plate of length a, width b and thickness h, which is made from a

    mixture of ceramics and metals. We assume that the composition is varied from the top to the

    bottom surface, i.e. the top surface (Z = h=2) of the plate is ceramic-rich whereas the bottom

    surface (Z = h=2) is metal-rich. In such a way, the eective material properties P, like Youngsmodulus E or thermal expansion coecient , can be expressed as

    P=PtVc +PbVm (1)

    in which Pt and Pb denote the temperature-dependent properties of the top and bottom surfaces

    of the plate, respectively, and Vc and Vm are the ceramic and metal volume fractions and are

    related by

    Vc + Vm = 1 (2)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    3/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 563

    and we assume the volume fraction Vm follows a simple power law as

    Vm =2Z + h2h

    N

    ; (3)

    where volume fraction index N dictates the material variation prole through the plate thickness and

    may be varied to obtain the optimum distribution of component materials. It is noted that similar

    denition can be found in Refs. [13,14], but is for Vc.

    From Eqs. (1)(3), the eective Youngs modulus E and thermal expansion coecient of an

    FGM plate can be written as

    E= (Eb Et)

    2Z + h

    2h

    N+Et; = (b t)

    2Z + h

    2h

    N+ t: (4)

    It is evident that when Z = h=2; E=Et and = t and when Z = h=2; E=Eb and = b. It is

    assumed that Et; Eb; t and b are functions of temperature, but Poissons ratio depends weaklyon temperature change and is assumed to be a constant, as shown in Section 4, so that E and are

    functions of temperature and position.

    The plate is subjected to a transverse uniform load q = q0 or a sinusoidal load q = q0 sin(X=a)

    sin(Y=b) combined with thermal loads. As usual, the reference coordinate system has its origin at

    the corner of the plate on the middle plane. Let U ; V and W be the plate displacements parallel to

    a right-hand set of axes (X; Y; Z), where X is longitudinal and Z is perpendicular to the plate. xand y are the mid-plane rotations of the normals about the Y and X axes, respectively. Let F(X; Y)

    be the stress function for the stress resultants dened by Nx = F; yy; Ny = F; xx and Nxy = F; xy,where a comma denotes partial dierentiation with respect to the corresponding coordinates.

    Based on Reddys higher-order shear deformation plate theory (HSDPT), including the thermal

    eects, the governing dierential equations for an FGM plate undergoing moderately large rotations

    in the von Karman sense can be derived as

    L11( W) L12( x) L13( y) + L14( F) L15( NT

    ) L16( MT

    ) = L( W ; F) + q; (5)

    L21( F) + L22( x) + L23( y) L24( W) + L25( NT

    ) = 12

    L( W ; W); (6)

    L31( W) + L32( x) L33( y) + L34( F) L35( NT

    ) L36( ST

    ) = 0; (7)

    L41( W) L42( x) + L43( y) + L44( F) L45( NT

    ) L46( ST

    ) = 0; (8)

    where linear operators Lij( ) and nonlinear operator L( ) are dened as in Appendix A.

    Note that these plate equations show thermal coupling as well as the interaction of stretching and

    bending.

    The forces, moments and higher-order moments caused by elevated temperature are dened by

    NT

    xM

    T

    xP

    T

    x

    NT

    yM

    T

    yP

    T

    y

    NT

    xyM

    T

    xyP

    T

    xy

    =

    h=2h=2

    (1; Z ; Z 3)

    Ax

    Ay

    Axy

    TdZ (9a)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    4/24

    564 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    and

    S

    T

    x

    STy

    ST

    xy

    =

    MT

    x

    MTy

    MT

    xy

    43h2

    PT

    x

    PTy

    PT

    xy

    ; (9b)

    where T is temperature rise from some reference temperature at which there are no thermal strains,

    and

    Ax

    Ay

    Axy

    =

    Q11 Q12 Q16

    Q12 Q22 Q26

    Q16 Q26 Q66

    1 0

    0 1

    0 0

    ; (10)

    where the thermal expansion coecient is given in detail in Eq. (4), and

    Q11 = Q22 =E

    1 2; Q12 =

    E

    1 2; Q16 = Q26 = 0; Q44 = Q55 = Q66 =

    E

    2(1 + )(11)

    in which E is also given in detail in Eq. (4), and vary through the plate thickness.

    All the edges are assumed to be simply supported. Depending upon the in-plane behavior at the

    edges, two cases, case 1 (referred to herein as movable edges) and case 2 (referred to herein as

    immovable edges), will be considered.

    Case 1: The edges are simply supported and freely movable in both the X- and Y-directions,

    respectively.Case 2: All four edges are simply supported with no in-plane displacements, i.e. prevented from

    moving in the X- and Y-directions.

    For these two cases the associated boundary conditions are

    X = 0; a:

    W = y = 0; (12a)

    Nxy = 0; (12b)

    b

    0

    Nx dY = 0 (movable edges); (12c)

    U = 0 (immovable edges); (12d)

    Y = 0; b:

    W = x = 0; (12e)

    Nxy = 0; (12f)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    5/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 565

    a0

    Ny dX = 0 (movable edges); (12g)

    V = 0 (immovable edges): (12h)

    It is noted that Eqs. (5) (8) are identical to those of unsymmetric cross-ply laminated plates

    under thermomechanical loading. The presence of stretching-bending coupling gives rise to bending

    curvatures under the action of in-plane loading, no matter how small these loads may be. In this

    situation the boundary condition of zero bending moment cannot be incorporated accurately. Because

    of immovable edges are considered in the present analysis, Mx = 0 (at X = 0; a) and My = 0 (at

    Y = 0; b) are not included in Eq. (12), as previously shown in Refs. [24,25].

    The unit end-shortening relationships are

    x

    a= 1

    ab

    b

    0

    a

    0

    9 U9X

    dX dY

    = 1

    ab

    b0

    a0

    A11

    92 F

    9Y2+A12

    92 F

    9X2+

    B11

    4

    3h2E11

    9 x

    9X+

    B12

    4

    3h2E12

    9 y

    9Y

    4

    3h2

    E11

    92 W

    9X2+E12

    92 W

    9Y2

    1

    2

    9 W

    9X

    2 (A11 N

    T

    x +A

    12N

    T

    y)

    dX dY (13a)

    y

    b= 1

    ab

    a

    0

    b

    0

    9 V9Y

    dY dX

    = 1

    ab

    a0

    b0

    A22

    92 F

    9X2+A12

    92 F

    9Y2+

    B21

    4

    3h2E21

    9 x

    9X

    +

    B22

    4

    3h2E22

    9 y

    9Y

    4

    3h2

    E21

    92 W

    9X2+E22

    92 W

    9Y2

    129

    W9Y

    2 (A12 NTx +A22 NTy)

    dY dX; (13b)

    where x and y are plate end-shortening displacements in the X- and Y-directions.

    In Eqs. (13) and (16) below, the reduced stiness matrices [Aij]; [B

    ij]; [D

    ij]; [E

    ij]; [F

    ij] and

    [Hij ] (i; j = 1; 2; 6) are functions of temperature and position, dened by

    A = A1; B = A1B; D = D BA1B; E = A1E;

    F = F EA1B; H = H EA1E; (14)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    6/24

    566 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    where Aij ; Bij, etc., are the plate stinesses, dened by

    (Aij; Bij; Dij ; Eij ; Fij ; Hij) = h=2

    h=2

    (Qij)(1; Z ; Z 2; Z3; Z4; Z6) dZ (i; j = 1; 2; 6); (15a)

    (Aij; Dij; Fij) =

    h=2h=2

    (Qij)(1; Z2; Z4) dZ (i; j = 4; 5): (15b)

    3. Analytical method and asymptotic solutions

    Having developed the theory, we will try to solve Eqs. (5)(8) with boundary condition (12).

    Before proceeding, it is convenient to rst dene the following dimensionless quantities for such

    plates [with ijk in Eqs. (22) and (24) below are dened as in Appendix B]:

    x = X=a; y = Y=b; = a=b; W = W =[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    F = F=[D11D

    22]1=2; (x; y) = ( x; y)a=[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    14 = [D

    22=D

    11]1=2; 24 = [A

    11=A

    22]1=2; 5 = A

    12=A

    22;

    (T1; T2) = (AT

    x ; ATy)a

    2=2[D11D

    22]1=2;

    (T3; T4; T6; T7) = (DT

    x ; DTy ; F

    Tx ; F

    Ty )a

    2=2h2D11;

    (31; 41) = (a2=2)[A55 8D55=h

    2 + 16F55=h4; A44 8D44=h

    2 + 16F44=h4]=D11;

    (Mx; My; Px; Py; M

    T

    x ; M

    T

    y ; P

    T

    x ; P

    T

    y )

    = ( Mx; My; 4 Px=3h2; 4 Py=3h

    2; MT

    x ; MT

    y ; 4 PT

    x =3h2; 4 P

    T

    y=3h2)a2=2D11[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    q = q0a4=4D11[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (x; y) = (x=a;y=b)b2=42[D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=2 (16)

    in which ATx (=ATy); D

    Tx (=D

    Ty ) and F

    Tx (=F

    Ty ) are dened by

    ATx DT

    x FT

    x

    ATy DTy F

    Ty

    =

    h=2h=2

    (1; Z ; Z 3)

    Ax

    Ay

    dZ (17)

    and the details of which can be found in Appendix C.The nonlinear governing Eqs. (5)(8) can then be written in dimensionless form as

    L11(W) L12(x) L13(y) + 14L14(F) L16(MT) = 14

    2L(W; F) + q; (18)

    L21(F) + 24L22(x) + 24L23(y) 24L24(W) = 12

    242L(W; W); (19)

    L31(W) + L32(x) L33(y) + 14L34(F) L36(ST) = 0; (20)

    L41(W) L42(x) + L43(y) + 14L44(F) L46(ST) = 0; (21)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    7/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 567

    where

    L11( ) = 11094

    9x4+ 2112

    2 94

    9x29y2+ 114

    4 94

    9y4;

    L12( ) = 1209

    3

    9x3+ 122

    2 93

    9x9y2;

    L13( ) = 13193

    9x29y+ 133

    3 93

    9y3;

    L14( ) = 14094

    9x4+ 142

    2 94

    9x29y2+ 144

    4 94

    9y4;

    L16(MT) =

    92

    9x2(MTx ) + 2

    92

    9x9y

    (MTxy) + 2 9

    2

    9y2(MTy );

    L21( ) =94

    9x4+ 2212

    2 94

    9x29y2+ 214

    4 94

    9y4;

    L22( ) = 22093

    9x3+ 222

    2 93

    9x9y2;

    L23( ) = 23193

    9x29y+ 233

    3 93

    9y3;

    L24( ) = 2409

    4

    9x4 + 2422 9

    4

    9x29y2 + 2444 9

    4

    9y4 ;

    L31( ) = 319

    9x+ 310

    93

    9x3+ 312

    2 93

    9x9y2;

    L32( ) = 31 32092

    9x2 322

    2 92

    9y2;

    L33( ) = 33192

    9x9y;

    L34( ) = L22( );

    L36(ST) =

    9

    9x(STx ) +

    9

    9y(STxy);

    L41( ) = 419

    9y+ 411

    93

    9x29y+ 413

    3 93

    9y3;

    L42( ) = L33( );

    L43( ) = 41 43092

    9x2 432

    2 92

    9y2;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    8/24

    568 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    L44( ) = L23( );

    L46(ST) =

    9

    9x

    (STxy) + 9

    9y

    (STy );

    L( ) =92

    9x292

    9y2 2

    92

    9x9y

    92

    9x9y+

    92

    9y292

    9x2: (22)

    The boundary conditions of Eq. (12) become

    x = 0; :

    W = y = 0; (23a)

    F;xy =0; (23b)

    0

    292F

    9y2dy = 0 (movable edges); (23c)

    x = 0 (immovable edges); (23d)

    y = 0; :

    W = x = 0; (23e)

    F;xy =0; (23f)

    0

    92

    F9x2

    dx = 0 (movable edges); (23g)

    y = 0 (immovable edges) (23h)

    and the unit end-shortening relationships become

    x = 1

    42224

    0

    0

    224

    2 92F

    9y2 5

    92F

    9x2+ 24

    511

    9x

    9x+ 233

    9y

    9y

    24 611 92W

    9x2+ 244

    2 92W

    9y2 1

    224 9W

    9x

    2

    + (224T1 5T2) T dx dy;(24a)

    y = 1

    42224

    0

    0

    92F

    9x2 5

    2 92F

    9y2+ 24

    220

    9x

    9x+ 522

    9y

    9y

    24

    240

    92W

    9x2+ 622

    2 92W

    9y2

    1

    224

    2

    9W

    9y

    2+ (T2 5T1) T

    dy dx:

    (24b)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    9/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 569

    Applying Eqs. (18)(24), the nonlinear bending response of a simply supported FGM plate sub-

    jected to a transverse uniform or sinusoidal load and in thermal environments is now determined by

    a mixed Galerkin-perturbation technique. The essence of this procedure, in the present case, is to

    assume that

    W(x; y; ) =j=1

    jwj(x; y); F(x; y; ) =j=0

    jfj(x; y);

    x(x; y; ) =j=1

    jxj(x; y); y(x; y; ) =j=1

    jyj(x; y); q =j=1

    jj ;(25)

    where is a small perturbation parameter and the rst term of wj(x; y) is assumed to have the form

    w1(x; y) = A(1)11 sin mx sin ny: (26)

    Then we expand the thermal-bending moments in the double Fourier sine series asMTx S

    Tx

    MTy STy

    =

    M(1)x S

    (1)x

    M(1)y S(1)y

    i=1;3;:::

    j=1;3;:::

    1

    ijsin ix sinjy; (27)

    where M(1)

    x ; M(1)y ; S

    (1)x and S

    (1)y , and all coecients in Eqs. (35)(37) below are given in detail in

    Appendix D.

    Substituting Eq. (25) into Eqs. (18)(21), collecting the terms of the same order of , gives a set

    of perturbation equations. By using Eqs. (26) and (27) to solve these perturbation equations of each

    order, the amplitudes of the terms wj(x; y); fj(x; y); xj(x; y) and yj(x; y) are determined step by

    step, and j can be determined by the Galerkin procedure. As a result, up to third-order asymptotic

    solutions can be obtained as

    W = [A(1)11 sin mx sin ny] +

    3[A(3)13 sin mx sin3ny +A

    (3)31 sin 3mx sin ny] + O(

    4); (28)

    x = [C(1)11 cos mx sin ny] +

    2[C(2)20 sin2mx] +

    3[C(3)13 cos mx sin 3ny

    + C(3)31 cos3mx sin ny] + O(

    4); (29)

    y = [D(1)11 sin mx cos ny] +

    2[D(2)02 sin 2ny] +

    3[D(3)13 sin mx cos3ny

    +D(3)31 sin 3mx cos ny] + O(

    4); (30)

    F= B(0)

    00

    y2

    2 b(0)

    00

    x2

    2 + [B(1)

    11 sin mx sin ny]

    + 2

    B(2)00y2

    2 b(2)00

    x2

    2+B

    (2)20 cos2mx +B

    (2)02 cos2ny

    + 3[B(3)13 sin mx sin 3ny +B

    (3)31 sin 3mx sin ny] + O(

    4): (31)

    Note that for boundary condition case 1, it is just necessary to take B(i)00 = b

    (i)00 = 0 (i = 0; 2) in Eq.

    (31), so that the asymptotic solutions have a similar form, and

    q = 1 + 22 +

    33 + O(4): (32)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    10/24

    570 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    All coecients in Eqs. (28)(31) are related and can be written as functions of A(1)11 , so that Eqs.

    (28) and (32) can be rewritten as

    W = W(1)

    (x; y)(A(1)11 ) + W

    (3)

    (x; y)(A(1)11 )

    3

    + (33)

    and

    q = (1)q (A

    (1)11 ) +

    (2)q (A

    (1)11 )

    2 + (3)q (A(1)11 )

    3 + : (34)

    From Eqs. (33) and (34) the load-central deection relationship can be written as

    q0a4

    D11h=A

    (0)W +A

    (1)W

    W

    h

    +A

    (2)W

    W

    h

    2+A

    (3)W

    W

    h

    3+ : (35)

    Similarly, the bending moment-central deection relationships can be written as

    Mxa2

    D11h=A

    (0)MX +A

    (1)MX

    Wh

    +A

    (2)MX

    Wh

    2+A

    (3)MX

    Wh

    3+ ; (36)

    Mya2

    D11h=A

    (0)MY +A

    (1)MY

    W

    h

    +A

    (2)MY

    W

    h

    2+A

    (3)MY

    W

    h

    3+ : (37)

    Eqs. (35)(37) can be employed to obtain numerical results for the load-deection and load-bending

    moment curves of an FGM plate subjected to a transverse uniform or sinusoidal load and in thermal

    environments.

    4. Numerical results and discussions

    To study the thermal eect on the nonlinear bending behavior of FGM plates subjected to a

    transverse uniform or sinusoidal load, many examples were solved numerically. In the numerical

    analysis, asymptotic solutions up to third order, as given by Eqs. (35)(37) with deected modes

    (m; n)=(1; 1), were used. Zirconia and titanium alloy were selected for the two constituent materials

    of the plate in the present examples, referred to as ZrO2=Ti6Al 4V. However, the analysis is

    equally applicable to other types of FGMs as well. The material properties P, such as Youngs

    modulus E and thermal expansion coecient , can be expressed as a function of temperature, see

    Ref. [26], as

    P=P0(P1T1 + 1 +P1T +P2T2 +P3T3) (38)

    in which T=T0 +T and T0 =300 K (room temperature), P0; P1; P1; P2 and P3 are the coecients

    of temperature T(K) and are unique to the constituent materials. Typical values for Youngs modulus

    E (Pa) and thermal expansion coecient (K) of Zirconia and Ti6Al4V (from Ref. [9]) are listed

    in Table 1. Poissons ratio is assumed to be a constant, and = 0:28.

    The accuracy and eectiveness of the present method for the nonlinear bending analysis of thin

    and moderately thick, isotropic plates with movable or immovable edges were examined by many

    comparison studies given in Shen [1518]. In addition, the load-center deection curves for a zir-

    conia/aluminum square plate with dierent values of the volume fraction index n, dened as in

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    11/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 571

    Table 1

    Temperature-dependent coecients for ceramics and metals, from Ref. [9]

    Materials P0 P

    1 P1 P2 P3

    Zirconia E 244:27e + 9 0 1:371e 3 1:214e 6 3:681e 10

    12:766e 6 0 1:491e 3 1:006e 5 6:778e 11

    Ti6Al4V E 122:56e + 9 0 4:586e 4 0 0

    7:5788e 6 0 6:638e 4 3:147e 6 0

    0 10 150.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Present

    Praveen & Reddy [13]

    1: aluminum2: n = 2.0

    3: n = 1.0

    4: n = 0.5

    5: zirconia5

    4

    3

    2

    1zirconia/aluminum

    = 1.0, b/h = 20

    uniform load

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    W/h

    5

    Fig. 1. Comparisons of load-central deection curves for a zirconia/aluminum square plate.

    Refs. [13,14], subjected to a uniform transverse load are compared in Fig. 1 with numerical results

    of Praveen and Reddy [13], using their material properties, i.e. for aluminum E= 70 GPa; = 0:3;

    = 23:0 106=

    C, and for zirconia E = 151 GPa; = 0:3, and = 10:0 106=

    C. Note that in

    Fig. 1, E0 is a referenced value of Youngs modulus, and E0 = 70 GPa. Clearly, the comparison is

    reasonably well.

    A parametric study has been carried out and typical results are shown in Figs. 27. It should

    be appreciated that in all of these gures W=h; Mxb2=E0h

    4 and q0b4=E0h

    4 denote the dimensionless

    central deection of the plate, central-bending moment and lateral pressure, respectively, where

    E0= Youngs modulus of Ti6Al4V at T = 300 K.The results presented herein are for movable in-plane boundary conditions, unless it is stated

    otherwise. In Figs. 37, the volume fraction index N = 0:5 and 5.0, and in Figs. 2, 3 and 57 the

    plate width-to-thickness ratio b=h = 20.

    Fig. 2 gives the load-deection and load-bending moment curves of ZrO 2=Ti6Al4V square plate

    with dierent values of volume fraction index N subjected to a uniform pressure and under thermal

    environmental condition T = 0 K. The results show that a fully titanium alloy plate (N = 0) has

    highest deection and lowest bending moment. It can also be seen that the plate has higher deection

    and lower bending moment when it has lower volume fraction. This is expected because the metallic

    plate is the one with the lower stiness than the ceramic plate.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    12/24

    572 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    2.0

    uniform load

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    W/h

    q0b4/E

    0h4 q0b

    4/E0h4

    Zr O2

    N= 5.0 N= 2.0 N= 1.0 N= 0.5

    Ti-6Al-4V

    Zr O2

    N= 5.0

    N= 2.0

    N= 1.0N= 0.5

    Ti-6Al-4V

    Zr O2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0, b/h = 20

    T0 = 300 K

    uniform load

    Zr O2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0, b/h = 20

    T0 = 300 K

    0

    1

    2

    3

    0 50 100 150

    Mx

    b2/E0

    h4

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 2. Eect of volume fraction index N on the nonlinear bending behavior of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates under

    uniform pressure: (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    1500 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    W/h

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    III: T= 300 K

    N= 5.0(III)N= 0.5(III)N= 5.0(II)N= 0.5(II)N= 5.0(I)N= 0.5(I)

    uniform load

    T0=300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0, b/h= 20

    0 50 100

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    0

    1

    2

    3

    N= 5.0(III)

    N= 0.5(III)

    N= 5.0(II)

    N= 0.5(II)

    N= 5.0(I)

    N= 0.5(I)

    Mx

    b2/E0

    h4

    I: T= 0K

    II: T= 200 K

    III: T= 300 K

    uniform load

    T0=300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0, b/h=20

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 3. Eect of temperature rise on the nonlinear bending behavior of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates under uniform

    pressure: (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    1500 50 1000.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    1: b/h = 20

    2: b/h = 10

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    W/h

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    uniform load

    T0=300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0

    q0b4/E0h

    4q0b

    4/E0h4

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    Mx

    b2/

    E0

    h4

    1: b/h = 20

    2: b/h = 10

    uniform load

    T0=300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    =1.0

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 4. Eect of plate thickness ratio b=h on the nonlinear bending behavior of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates under

    uniform pressure: (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    13/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 573

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    1: = 1.0

    2: = 1.5

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    uniform load

    T0 = 300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    b/h =20

    W/h

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)

    N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    0 20 40 60 80

    1: = 1.0

    2: = 1.5N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)

    N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    Mx

    b2/E0

    h4

    uniform load

    T0

    = 300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    b/h = 20

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 5. Eect of plate aspect ratio on the nonlinear bending behavior of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V plates under uniform pressure:

    (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    0 50 100 150

    0

    1

    2

    31: movable edges

    2: immovable edges

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    uniform load

    T0

    = 300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    = 1.0, b/h = 20

    W/h

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)

    N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    0 50 100 150

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)

    N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    Mx

    b2/E0

    h4

    1: movable edges

    2: immovable edges

    uniform load

    T0

    = 300 K

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    = 1.0, b/h = 20

    q0b4/E0h

    4(a) (b)

    Fig. 6. Eect of in-plane boundary conditions on the nonlinear bending behavior of ZrO 2=Ti6Al4V square plates under

    uniform pressure: (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    0 50 100 1500.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    1: uniform load

    2: sinusoidal load

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    = 1.0, b/h = 20T

    0= 300 K

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    I: T= 0 KII: T= 200 K

    W/h

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    q0b4/E0h

    4

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    0 50 100 150

    ZrO2/Ti-6Al-4V

    = 1.0, b/h = 20T0 = 300 K

    1: uniform load

    2: sinusoidal load

    N= 5.0 (II & 2)

    N= 0.5 (II & 2)

    N= 5.0 (I & 2)

    N= 0.5 (I & 2)

    N= 5.0 (II & 1)

    N= 0.5 (II & 1)

    N= 5.0 (I & 1)

    N= 0.5 (I & 1)

    I: T= 0 K

    II: T= 200 K

    Mxb

    2/E0

    h4

    (a) (b)

    Fig. 7. Comparisons of nonlinear responses of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates subjected to a uniform or sinusoidal load

    and in thermal environments: (a) load-central deection; and (b) load-bending moment.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    14/24

    574 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    Fig. 3 gives the load-deection and load-bending moment curves of ZrO2=Ti 6Al4V square

    plates subjected to a uniform pressure and under three sets of thermal environmental conditions,

    referred to as IIII. For environmental case I, T = 0 K, for environmental case II, T = 200 K

    and for environmental case III, T = 300 K. Because the thermal expansion at the top surface ishigher than that at the bottom surface, this expansion results in an upward deection. It is seen that

    the deections are reduced, but the bending moments are increased with increases in temperature.

    Note that for environmental cases II and III the deections are close to each other when W=h 1:5.

    Fig. 4 gives the load-deection and load-bending moment curves of ZrO2=Ti 6Al4V square

    plates with dierent values of width-to-thickness ratio b=h (=10 and 20) under two environmental

    conditions I and II. As expected, these results show that the dimensionless central deections are

    decreased, but the bending moments are increased, by increasing plate width-to-thickness ratio b=h

    for both cases I and II.

    Fig. 5 shows the eect of plate aspect ratio (=1:0 and 1.5) on the nonlinear bending behavior of

    ZrO2=Ti6Al4V rectangular plates under two environmental conditions. It can be seen that centraldeections are increased but the bending moments are decreased as changes from 1.0 to 1.5.

    Fig. 6 shows the eect of in-plane boundary conditions on the nonlinear bending behavior of

    ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates under two environmental conditions. To this end, the load-deection

    and load-bending moment curves of ZrO2=Ti6Al4V square plates under movable and immovable

    in-plane boundary conditions are displayed. The results show that the plate with immovable edges

    will undergo less deection with smaller bending moments.

    Fig. 7 compares the load-deection curves and load-bending moment curves of ZrO2=Ti6Al

    4V square plates under two cases of transverse loading conditions along with two environmental

    conditions. It can be seen that both load-deection and load-bending moment curves of the plate

    subjected to a sinusoidal load are lower than those of the plate subjected to a uniform load.

    5. Concluding remarks

    The nonlinear bending behavior of functionally graded rectangular plates subjected to a transverse

    uniform or sinusoidal load and in thermal environments has been presented. Material properties

    are assumed to be temperature-dependent, and graded in the thickness direction according to a

    simple power-law distribution in terms of the volume fractions of the constituents. A mixed Galerkin-

    perturbation technique is employed to determine the load-deection and load-bending moment curves.

    Numerical results are for ZrO2=Ti6Al4V plates. In eect, the results provide information about

    nonlinear bending responses of FGM plates for dierent proportions of the ceramic and metal. Theyalso conrm that the characteristics of nonlinear bending are signicantly inuenced by temperature

    rise, the character of in-plane boundary conditions, transverse shear deformation, plate aspect ratio

    as well as volume fraction distributions.

    Acknowledgements

    This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant

    59975058. The author is grateful for this nancial support.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    15/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 575

    Appendix A

    In Eqs. (4)(7)

    L11( ) =4

    3h2

    F11

    94

    9X4+ (F12 +F

    21 + 4F

    66)9

    4

    9X29Y2+F22

    94

    9Y4

    ;

    L12( ) =

    D11

    4

    3h2F11

    93

    9X3+

    (D12 + 2D

    66) 4

    3h2(F12 + 2F

    66)

    93

    9X9Y2;

    L13( ) =

    (D12 + 2D

    66) 4

    3h2(F21 + 2F

    66)

    93

    9X29Y+

    D22

    4

    3h2F22

    93

    9Y3;

    L14( ) = B

    21

    94

    9X4 + (B

    11 +B

    22 2B

    66)

    94

    9X29Y2 +B

    12

    94

    9Y4 ;

    L15( NT

    ) =9

    2

    9X2(B11 N

    T

    x +B

    21N

    T

    y) + 29

    2

    9X9Y(B66 N

    T

    xy) +9

    2

    9Y2(B12 N

    T

    x +B

    22N

    T

    y);

    L16( MT

    ) =92

    9X2( M

    T

    x ) + 292

    9X9Y( M

    T

    xy) +92

    9Y2( M

    T

    y);

    L21( ) = A

    22

    94

    9X4+ (2A12 +A

    66)94

    9X29Y2+A11

    94

    9Y4;

    L22

    ( ) = B21

    4

    3h2E

    21 939X3

    + (B11

    B66

    ) 4

    3h2(E

    11E

    66) 93

    9X9Y2;

    L23( ) =

    (B22 B

    66) 4

    3h2(E22 E

    66)

    93

    9X29Y+

    B12

    4

    3h2E12

    93

    9Y3;

    L24( ) =4

    3h2

    E21

    94

    9X4+ (E11 +E

    22 2E

    66)94

    9X29Y2+E12

    94

    9Y4

    ;

    L25( NT

    ) =92

    9X2(A12 N

    T

    x +A

    22N

    T

    y) 92

    9X9Y(A66 N

    T

    xy) +92

    9Y2(A11 N

    T

    x +A

    12N

    T

    y);

    L31( ) =A55

    8

    h2 D55 +

    16

    h4 F55 99X +

    4

    3h2

    (F

    11

    4

    3h2 H

    11)

    93

    9X3

    +

    (F21 + 2F

    66) 4

    3h2(H12 + 2H

    66)

    93

    9X9Y2

    ;

    L32( ) =

    A55

    8

    h2D55 +

    16

    h4F55

    D11

    8

    3h2F11 +

    16

    9h4H11

    92

    9X2

    D66

    8

    3h2F66 +

    16

    9h4H66

    92

    9Y2;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    16/24

    576 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    L33( ) =

    (D12 +D

    66) 4

    3h2(F12 +F

    21 + 2F

    66) +16

    9h4(H12 +H

    66)

    92

    9X9Y;

    L34( ) = L22( );

    L35( NT

    ) =9

    9X

    B11

    4

    3h2E11

    N

    T

    x +

    B21

    4

    3h2E21

    N

    T

    y

    +9

    9Y

    B66

    4

    3h2E66

    N

    T

    xy

    ;

    L36( ST

    ) =9

    9X( S

    T

    x ) +9

    9Y( S

    T

    xy);

    L41( ) =A44 8

    h2D44 + 16

    h4F44

    99Y

    + 43h2

    (F12 + 2F

    66) 43h2(H12 + 2H

    66)

    93

    9X29Y

    +

    F22

    4

    3h2H22

    93

    9Y3

    ;

    L42( ) = L33( );

    L43( ) =

    A44

    8

    h2D44 +

    16

    h4F44

    D66

    8

    3h2F66 +

    16

    9h4H66

    92

    9X2

    D22 83h2

    F22 + 169h4H22

    92

    9Y2;

    L44( ) = L23( );

    L45( NT

    ) =9

    9X

    B66

    4

    3h2E66

    N

    T

    xy

    +

    9

    9Y

    B12

    4

    3h2E12

    N

    T

    x +

    B22

    4

    3h2E22

    N

    T

    y

    ;

    L46( ST

    ) =9

    9X( S

    T

    xy) +9

    9Y( S

    T

    y );

    L( ) =92

    9X292

    9Y2 2

    92

    9X9Y

    92

    9X9Y+

    92

    9Y292

    9X2: (A.1)

    Appendix B

    In Eqs. (22) and (24)

    (110; 112; 114) = (4=3h2)[F11; (F

    12 +F

    21 + 4F

    66)=2; F

    22]=D

    11;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    17/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 577

    (120; 122) = [D

    11 4F

    11=3h2; (D12 + 2D

    66) 4(F

    12 + 2F

    66)=3h2]=D11;

    (131; 133) = [(D

    12 + 2D

    66) 4(F

    21 + 2F

    66)=3h2; D22 4F

    22=3h2]=D11;

    (140; 142; 144) = [B

    21; (B

    11 +B

    22 2B

    66); B

    12]=[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (212; 214) = (A

    12 +A

    66=2; A

    11)=A

    22;

    (220; 222) = [B

    21 4E

    21=3h2; (B11 B

    66) 4(E

    11 E

    66)=3h2]=[D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (231; 233) = [(B

    22 B

    66) 4(E

    22 E

    66)=3h2; B12 4E

    12=3h2]=[D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (240; 242; 244) = (4=3h2)[E21; (E

    11 +E

    22 2E

    66); E

    12]=[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (310; 312) = (4=3h2)[F11 4H

    11=3h2; (F21 + 2F

    66) 4(H

    12 + 2H

    66)=3h2]=D11;

    (320; 322) = (D

    11 8F

    11=3h2

    + 16H

    11=9h4

    ; D

    66 8F

    66=3h2

    + 16H

    66=9h4

    )=D

    11;

    331 = [(D

    12 +D

    66) 4(F

    12 +F

    21 + 2F

    66)=3h2 + 16(H12 +H

    66)=9h4]=D11;

    (411; 413) = (4=3h2)[(F12 + 2F

    66) 4(H

    12 + 2H

    66)=3h2; F22 4H

    22=3h2]=D11;

    (430; 432) = (D

    66 8F

    66=3h2 + 16H66=9h

    4; D22 8F

    22=3h2 + 16H22=9h

    4)=D11;

    (511; 522) = (B

    11 4E

    11=3h2; B22 4E

    22=3h2)=[D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (611; 622) = (4=3h2)(E11; E

    22)=[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (711; 722) = (B

    11; B

    22)=[D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4;

    (812; 821) = (D

    12 4F

    12=3h2; D12 4F

    21=3h2)=D11;

    (912; 921) = (4=3h2)(F12; F

    21)=D

    1 : (B.1)

    Appendix C

    In Eq. (17)

    ATx =h

    1 (b t)(Eb Et)

    1

    2N + 1+ [t(Eb Et) + (b t)Et]

    1

    N + 1+ tEt

    ;

    DTx =h2

    1

    (b t)(Eb Et)

    N

    2(N + 1)(2N + 1)

    + [t(Eb Et) + (b t)Et]N

    2(N + 1)(N + 2)

    ;

    FTx =h4

    1

    (b t)(Eb Et)

    1

    8(2N + 1)

    3

    8(N + 1)(2N + 1)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    18/24

    578 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    +3

    2(N + 1)(2N + 1)(2N + 3)

    3

    2(N + 1)(N + 2)(2N + 1)(2N + 3)

    + [t(Eb Et) + (b t)Et]

    1

    8(N + 1)

    3

    4(N + 1)(N + 2)

    +3

    (N + 1)(N + 2)(N + 3)

    6

    (N + 1)(N + 2)(N + 3)(N + 4)

    : (C.1)

    Appendix D

    In Eq. (27)M(1)x S

    (1)x

    M(1)y S(1)y

    =

    16

    2T

    ( W =h)

    T3 T3 T6

    T4 T4 T7

    A

    (1)11 (D.1)

    and in Eqs. (35)(37)

    A(0)W =

    4 T[(T3m2 + T4n

    22) 11];

    A(1)W =

    4C11[S11 CW1];

    A(2)W =

    4W22 h

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4

    ;

    A(3)W =

    4C11{(313 + 331)[S11 CW1] +1

    1614242}

    h2

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=2

    ;

    A(0)

    MX = 92416T(T3

    X11)=11025 + CX0;

    A(1)

    MX = 2X11;

    A(2)

    MX = 2X22

    h

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4

    ;

    A(3)

    MX = 2[X11(313 + 331) X33]

    h2

    [D

    11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=2;

    A(0)

    MY = 92416 T(T4

    Y11)=11025 + CY0;

    A(1)

    MY = 2Y11;

    A(2)

    MY = 2Y22

    h

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4

    ;

    A(3)

    MY = 2[Y11(313 + 331) Y33]

    h2

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=2

    (D.2)

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    19/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 579

    in which

    2 =m4

    7+

    n44

    6+ C22; S11 = g08 + 1424m

    2n22g05g07

    g06;

    S13 = g138 + 14249m2n22

    g135g137

    g136; S31 = g318 + 14249m

    2n22g315g317

    g316;

    W22 =1

    3C111424m

    2n22

    8

    6+

    9

    7+ 4

    g05

    g06

    ; 11 = g

    08 + 1424g05g07

    g06;

    6 = 1 + 14242230

    4m2

    41 + 3224m2; 7 =

    224 + 1424

    2223

    4n22

    31 + 3224n22;

    8 = 140 1202204m2

    31 + 3204m2

    ; 9 = 144 1332334n22

    41 + 4324n2

    2

    ;

    18 = 722 8122204m2

    31 + 3204m2; 19 = 711 821233

    4n22

    41 + 4324n22;

    J13 = S13 C13; J31 = S31 C31;

    313 =1

    161424

    m2

    7J13; 331 =

    1

    161424

    n22

    6J31;

    X11 = (110m2 + 921n

    22) + 1424(140m2 + 711n

    22)g05

    g06

    + 120m2

    g04g00

    1424 g02g05g00g06

    + 821n22

    g03g00

    1424 g01g05g00g06

    ;

    X22 =1

    81424

    m219

    7+

    n228

    6+ CX2

    ; X33 =

    116

    1424(X13 + X31);

    X13 = 1424m4

    7J13

    (140m

    2 + 7119n22)

    m2120g132 + 9n22821g131

    g130

    g135

    g136

    +m4

    7J13

    (110m

    2 + 9219n22) +

    m2120g134 + 9n22821g133

    g130

    ;

    X31 = 1424 n4

    4

    6J31

    (1409m

    2 + 711n22) 9m

    2

    120g312 + n2

    2

    821g311g310

    g315g316

    +n44

    6J31

    (1109m

    2 + 921n22) +

    9m2120g314 + n22821g313

    g310

    ;

    Y11 = (912m2 + 114n

    22) + 1424(722m2 + 144n

    22)g05

    g06

    + 812m2

    g04

    g00 1424

    g02g05

    g00g06

    + 133n

    22

    g03

    g00 1424

    g01g05

    g00g06

    ;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    20/24

    580 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    Y22 =1

    81424

    m29

    7+

    n2218

    6+ CY2

    ; Y33 =

    116

    1424(Y13 + Y31);

    Y13 = 1424m4

    7J13

    (722m

    2 + 1449n22)

    m2812g132 + 9n22133g131

    g130

    g135

    g136

    +m4

    7J13

    (912m

    2 + 1149n22) +

    m2812g134 + 9n22133g133

    g130

    ;

    Y31 = 1424n44

    6J31

    (7229m

    2 + 144n22)

    9m2812g312 + n22133g311

    g310

    g315

    g316

    +n44

    6J31 (9129m2 + 114n

    22) +9m2812g314 + n

    22133g313

    g310 ;X11 = 120m

    2 g

    04

    g00+ 821n

    22g03g00

    ; Y11 = 812m2 g

    04

    g00+ 133n

    22g03g00

    ;

    g00 = (31 + 320m2 + 322n

    22)(41 + 430m2 + 432n

    22) 2331m2n22;

    g01 = (31 + 320m2 + 322n

    22)(231m2 + 233n

    22) 331n22(220m

    2 + 222n22);

    g02 = (41 + 430m2 + 432n

    22)(220m2 + 222n

    22) 331m2(231m

    2 + 233n22);

    g03 = (31 + 320m2 + 322n

    22)(41 411m2 413n

    22) 331m2(31 310m

    2 312n22);

    g

    03 = (31 + 320m2

    + 322n2

    2

    )(T4 T7) 331m2

    (T3 T6);

    g04 = (41 + 430m2 + 432n

    22)(31 310m2 312n

    22) 331n22(41 411m

    2 413n22);

    g04 = (41 + 430m2 + 432n

    22)(T3 T6) 331n22(T4 T7);

    g05 = (240m4 + 242m

    2n2 + 244n44)

    +m2(220m

    2 + 222n22)g04 + n

    22(231m2 + 233n

    22)g03

    g00;

    g05 =m2(220m

    2 + 222n22)g04 + n

    22(231m2 + 233n

    22)g03

    g00

    ;

    g06 = (m4 + 2212m

    2n22 + 214n44)

    + 1424m2(220m

    2 + 222n22)g02 + n

    22(231m2 + 233n

    22)g01

    g00;

    g07 = (140m4 + 142m

    2n2 + 144n44)

    m2(120m

    2 + 122n22)g02 + n

    22(131m2 + 133n

    22)g01

    g00;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    21/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 581

    g08 = (110m4 + 2112m

    2n22 + 114n44)

    +

    m2(120m2 + 122n

    22)g04 + n22(131m

    2 + 133n22)g03

    g00 ;

    g08 =m2(120m

    2 + 122n22)g04 + n

    22(131m2 + 133n

    22)g03g00

    ;

    g130 = (31 + 320m2 + 3229n

    22)(41 + 430m2 + 4329n

    22) 23319m2n22;

    g131 = (31 + 320m2 + 3229n

    22)(231m2 + 2339n

    22) 3319n22(220m

    2 + 2229n22);

    g132 = (41 + 430m2 + 4329n

    22)(220m2 + 2229n

    22) 331m2(231m

    2 + 2339n22);

    g133 = (31 + 320m2

    + 3229n2

    2

    )(41 411m2

    4139n2

    2

    )

    331m2(31 310m

    2 3129n22);

    g134 = (41 + 430m2 + 4329n

    22)(31 310m2 3129n

    22)

    3319n22(41 411m

    2 4139n22);

    g135 = (240m4 + 9242m

    2n2 + 81244n44)

    +m2(220m

    2 + 2229n22)g134 + 9n

    22(231m2 + 2339n

    22)g133

    g130

    ;

    g136 = (m4 + 18212m

    2n22 + 81214n44)

    + 1424m2(220m

    2 + 2229n22)g132 + 9n

    22(231m2 + 2339n

    22)g131

    g130;

    g137 = (140m4 + 9142m

    2n2 + 81144n44)

    m2(120m

    2 + 1229n22)g132 + 9n

    22(131m2 + 1339n

    22)g131

    g130;

    g138 = (110m4 + 18112m2n22 + 11481n44)

    +m2(120m

    2 + 1229n22)g134 + 9n

    22(131m2 + 1339n

    22)g133

    g130;

    g310 = (31 + 3209m2 + 322n

    22)(41 + 4309m2 + 432n

    22) 23319m2n22;

    g311 = (31 + 3209m2 + 322n

    22)(2319m2 + 233n

    22) 331n22(2209m

    2 + 222n22);

    g312 = (41 + 4309m2 + 432n

    22)(2209m2 + 222n

    22) 3319m2(2319m

    2 + 233n22);

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    22/24

    582 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    g313 = (31 + 3209m2 + 322n

    22)(41 4119m2 413n

    22)

    3319m2(31 3109m

    2 312n22);

    g314 = (41 + 4309m2 + 432n

    22)(31 3109m2 312n

    22)

    331n22(41 4119m

    2 413n22);

    g315 = (81240m4 + 9242m

    2n2 + 244n44)

    +9m2(220m

    2 + 222n22)g314 + n

    22(2319m2 + 233n

    22)g313

    g310;

    g316 = (81m4 + 18212m

    2n22 + 214n44)

    + 14249m2(2209m

    2 + 222n22)g312 + n

    22(2319m2 + 233n

    22)g311

    g310;

    g317 = (81140m4 + 9142m

    2n2 + 144n44)

    9m2(1209m

    2 + 122n22)g312 + n

    22(1319m2 + 133n

    22)g311

    g310;

    g318 = (81110m4 + 18112m

    2n22 + 114n44)

    + 9m2

    (1209m2

    + 122n2

    2

    )g314 + n2

    2

    (1319m2

    + 133n2

    2

    )g313g310

    (D.3)

    and

    C11 =2

    16mn (for uniform load); (D.4a)

    C11 = 1 (for sinusoidal load) (D.4b)

    in the above equations, for the case of movable edges

    CW1 = CX0 = CY0 = CX2 = CY2 = C22 = C13 = C31 = 0 (D.5a)

    and for the case of immovable edges

    CW1 = 14(T1m2 + T2n

    22) T;

    CX0 = 214(711T1 + 140T2) T

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4

    h;

    CY0 = 214(144T1 + 722T2) T

    [D11D

    22A

    11A

    22]1=4

    h;

    C22 = 2(m4 + 224n

    44) + 25m2n22

    224 25

    ;

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    23/24

    H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584 583

    C13 = 14(T1m2 + 9T2n

    22) T; C31 = 14(9T1m2 + T2n

    22) T;

    CX2 = 711m2 + 5n

    22

    224 25+ 140

    5m2 + 224n

    22

    224 25;

    CY2 = 144m2 + 5n

    22

    224 25

    + 7225m

    2 + 224n22

    224 25

    : (D.5b)

    References

    [1] Yamanoushi M, Koizumi M, Hiraii T, Shiota I, editors. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on

    Functionally Gradient Materials, Japan, 1990.

    [2] Koizumi M. The concept of FGM. Ceramic Transactions, Functionally Gradient Materials 1993;34:310.

    [3] Noda N, Tsuji T. Steady thermal stresses in a plate of functionally gradient material. Transactions of Japan Society

    of Mechanical Engineers Series A 1991;57:98103.[4] Noda N, Tsuji T. Steady thermal stresses in a plate of functionally gradient material with temperature-dependent

    properties. Transactions of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Series A 1991;57:62531.

    [5] Tanigawa Y, Ootao Y, Kawamura R. Thermal bending of laminated composite rectangular plates and

    nonhomogeneous plates due to partial heating. Journal of Thermal Stresses 1991;14:285308.

    [6] Tanigawa Y, Akai T, Kawamura R, Oka N. Transient heat conduction and thermal stress problems of a

    nonhomogeneous plate with temperature-dependent material properties. Journal of Thermal Stresses 1996;19:77102.

    [7] Aboudi J, Pindera MJ, Arnold SM. Thermoelastic theory for the response of materials functionally graded in two

    directions. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1996;33:93166.

    [8] Ootao Y, Tanigawa Y. Three-dimensional transient thermal stresses of functionally graded rectangular plate due to

    partial heating. Journal of Thermal Stresses 1999;22:3555.

    [9] Reddy JN, Chin CD. Thermoelastical analysis of functionally graded cylinders and plates. Journal of Thermal Stresses

    1998;21:593626.

    [10] Reddy JN, Wang CM, Kitipornchai S. Axisymmetric bending of functionally graded circular and annular plates.European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 1999;18:18599.

    [11] Praveen GN, Chin CD, Reddy JN. Thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded ceramicmetal cylinder. ASCE

    Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1999;125:125967.

    [12] Mizuguchi F, Ohnabe H. Large deections of heated functionally graded simply supported rectangular plates with

    varying rigidity in thickness direction. Proceedings of the 11th Technical Conference of the American Society

    for Composites, 79 October 1996, Atlanta, GA, USA. Lancaster, PA, USA: Technomic Publ Co Inc., 1996.

    p. 957 66.

    [13] Praveen GN, Reddy JN. Nonlinear transient thermoelastic analysis of functionally graded ceramicmetal plates.

    International Journal of Solids and Structures 1998;35:445776.

    [14] Reddy JN. Analysis of functionally graded plates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

    2000;47:66384.

    [15] Shen HS. Nonlinear bending of simply supported rectangular ReissnerMindlin plates under transverse and in-planeloads and resting on elastic foundations. Engineering Structures 2000;22:84756.

    [16] Shen HS. Nonlinear analysis of simply supported ReissnerMindlin plates subjected to lateral pressure and thermal

    loading and resting on two-parameter elastic foundations. Engineering Structures 2000;22:148193.

    [17] Shen HS. Nonlinear bending of shear deformable laminated plates under lateral pressure and thermal loading and

    resting on elastic foundations. Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 2000;35:93108.

    [18] Shen HS. Nonlinear bending of shear deformable laminated plates under transverse and in-plane loads and resting

    on elastic foundations. Composite Structures 2000;50:13142.

    [19] Yang J, Shen HS. Non-linear analysis of functionally graded plates under transverse and in-plane loads. International

    Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics (in press).

    [20] Reddy JN. A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics

    1984;51:74552.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn

  • 7/29/2019 Nonlinear bending response of functionally graded plates subjected to trnverse loads and in thermal environments

    24/24

    584 H.-S. Shen / International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 44 (2002) 561 584

    [21] Reddy JN. Mechanics of laminated composite plates: theory and analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997.

    [22] Reddy JN. Theory and analysis of elastic plates. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, 1999.

    [23] Wang CM, Reddy JN, Lee KH. Shear deformation theories of beams and plates relationships with classical solutions.

    UK: Elsevier, 2000.[24] Kuppusamy T, Reddy JN. A three-dimensional nonlinear analysis of cross-ply rectangular composite plates.

    Computers and Structures 1984;18:26372.

    [25] Singh G, Rao GV, Iyengar NGR. Geometrically nonlinear exural response characteristics of shear deformable

    unsymmterically laminated plates. Computers and Structures 1994;53:6981.

    [26] Touloukian YS. Thermophysical properties of high temperature solid materials. New York: McMillan, 1967.

    ____________________________________________________________________________www.paper.edu.cn