non-supersymmetric gepner orientifoldst58/presentations/philadelphia.pdf · quevedo, cremades,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifolds
A.N. Schellekens
![Page 2: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Based on
B. Gato-Rivera and A.N. Schellekens,
Phys.Lett.B656:127-131,2007 and to appear.Also:Dijkstra, Huiszoon, Schellekens,Phys.Lett.B609:408-417,2005, Nucl.Phys.B710:3-57,2005,
Anastasopoulos, Dijkstra, Kiritsis, Schellekens.Nucl.Phys.B759:83-146,2006
![Page 3: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LHC may provide evidence in favor of this picture:
10log Q
1/_
i
1/_1
1/_2
1/_3
MSSM
10log Q
1/_
i
Unification of the Coupling Constants in the SM and the minimal MSSM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Furstenau, PL B260(1991) 447coupling constants of electromagnetic –, weak–, and stong interactions
due to radiative corrections (LO)Wim de Boer Seminar DESY-Zeuthen 7
![Page 4: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Finding supersymmetry plus better evidence forGUT unification would be an exciting event in“Beyond the Standard Model” phenomenology.
It would point to a new fundamental theory withmore symmetries.
But we are string phenomenologists, so we alreadyhave some idea what that new fundamental theoryshould be.
![Page 5: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
But might this be just a coincidence?
10log Q
1/_
i
1/_1
1/_2
1/_3
MSSM
10log Q
1/_
i
Unification of the Coupling Constants in the SM and the minimal MSSM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Furstenau, PL B260(1991) 447coupling constants of electromagnetic –, weak–, and stong interactions
due to radiative corrections (LO)Wim de Boer Seminar DESY-Zeuthen 7
![Page 6: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
But might this be just a coincidence?
This is an implicit assumption in orientifold or intersecting D-brane model building, and many theorists are working on that:
10log Q
1/_
i
1/_1
1/_2
1/_3
MSSM
10log Q
1/_
i
Unification of the Coupling Constants in the SM and the minimal MSSM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Furstenau, PL B260(1991) 447coupling constants of electromagnetic –, weak–, and stong interactions
due to radiative corrections (LO)Wim de Boer Seminar DESY-Zeuthen 7
![Page 7: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
But might this be just a coincidence?
This is an implicit assumption in orientifold or intersecting D-brane model building, and many theorists are working on that:
Ibanez, Marchesano, Rabadan, Cveltic, Shiu, Uranga, Lüst, Blumenhagen, Gorlich, Ott, Honecker, Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li, Liu, Körs, Stieberger, Cascales, Camara, Antoniadis, Kiritsis, Anastasopoulos, Kokorelis, Rizos, Tomaras, Bailin, Love, Nanopoulos, ....
10log Q
1/_
i
1/_1
1/_2
1/_3
MSSM
10log Q
1/_
i
Unification of the Coupling Constants in the SM and the minimal MSSM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Furstenau, PL B260(1991) 447coupling constants of electromagnetic –, weak–, and stong interactions
due to radiative corrections (LO)Wim de Boer Seminar DESY-Zeuthen 7
![Page 8: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
But might this be just a coincidence?
This is an implicit assumption in orientifold or intersecting D-brane model building, and many theorists are working on that:
Ibanez, Marchesano, Rabadan, Cveltic, Shiu, Uranga, Lüst, Blumenhagen, Gorlich, Ott, Honecker, Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li, Liu, Körs, Stieberger, Cascales, Camara, Antoniadis, Kiritsis, Anastasopoulos, Kokorelis, Rizos, Tomaras, Bailin, Love, Nanopoulos, ....
So we are in excellent company...
10log Q
1/_
i
1/_1
1/_2
1/_3
MSSM
10log Q
1/_
i
Unification of the Coupling Constants in the SM and the minimal MSSM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15
U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, H. Furstenau, PL B260(1991) 447coupling constants of electromagnetic –, weak–, and stong interactions
due to radiative corrections (LO)Wim de Boer Seminar DESY-Zeuthen 7
![Page 9: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Dijkstra, Huiszoon, Schellekens, Nucl.Phys.B710:3-57,2005
![Page 10: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Motivation
![Page 11: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Motivation
If coupling constant convergence is just a coincidence, who needs susy?Even if not, this part of the landscape must be explored anyway, in order to know why we don’t live there.Can we really eradicate susy from the spectrum?The supersymmetric results suggest that Gepner models are more “generic” that free-field theory based approaches (free fermions, orbifolds)It can be done.
![Page 12: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Nr
of
so
luti
on
s
N r of chira l families
S tandard model spectrum with 1 till 9 chira l families
type 4type 2type 0type 5type 3type 1
![Page 13: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Nr
of
so
luti
on
s
N r of chira l families
S tandard model spectrum with 1 till 9 chira l families
type 4type 2type 0type 5type 3type 1
![Page 14: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
RCFT ORIENTIFOLDS
![Page 15: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
OrientifoldPartition Functions
Closed
Open
• Closed string projection
1
2
!
"
#
ij
!i(")Zij!i(") +#
i
Ki!i(2")
$
%
• Open string projection
1
2
!
"
#
i,a,n
NaNbAiab!i(
"
2) +
#
i,a
NaMia!i(
"
2+
1
2)
$
%
Na = Chan-Paton Multiplicity
i : Primary field label (finite range)a : Boundary label (finite range)�i : CharacterNa : Chan-Paton (CP) Multiplicity
![Page 16: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Coefficients
Klein bottle
Annulus
Moebius
Partition functions
— Klein bottle:
Ki =!
m,J,J !
SimU(m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
— Unoriented Annulus:
Ai[a,!a][b,!b]
=!
m,J,J !
SimR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! R[b,!b](m,J !)
S0m
— Moebius:
M i[a,!a] =
!
m,J,J !
P imR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
Here g!,m is the Ishibashi metric
g!,mJ,J ! =
Sm0
SmK!K(J)"J !,Jc .
Partition functions
— Klein bottle:
Ki =!
m,J,J !
SimU(m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
— Unoriented Annulus:
Ai[a,!a][b,!b]
=!
m,J,J !
SimR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! R[b,!b](m,J !)
S0m
— Moebius:
M i[a,!a] =
!
m,J,J !
P imR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
Here g!,m is the Ishibashi metric
g!,mJ,J ! =
Sm0
SmK!K(J)"J !,Jc .
Partition functions
— Klein bottle:
Ki =!
m,J,J !
SimU(m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
— Unoriented Annulus:
Ai[a,!a][b,!b]
=!
m,J,J !
SimR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! R[b,!b](m,J !)
S0m
— Moebius:
M i[a,!a] =
!
m,J,J !
P imR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
Here g!,m is the Ishibashi metric
g!,mJ,J ! =
Sm0
SmK!K(J)"J !,Jc .
Partition functions
— Klein bottle:
Ki =!
m,J,J !
SimU(m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
— Unoriented Annulus:
Ai[a,!a][b,!b]
=!
m,J,J !
SimR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! R[b,!b](m,J !)
S0m
— Moebius:
M i[a,!a] =
!
m,J,J !
P imR[a,!a](m,J)g
!,mJ,J ! U(m,J !)
S0m
Here g!,m is the Ishibashi metric
g!,mJ,J ! =
Sm0
SmK!K(J)"J !,Jc .
![Page 17: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Boundary coefficients
Crosscap coefficients
Boundaries and CrosscapsBoundaries and crosscaps
• Boundary coe!cients
R[a,!a](m,J) =
!
|H||Ca||Sa|
!!a(J)SJ
am
• Crosscap coe!cients
U(m,J) =1
"
|H|
#
L"H
"(K, L)PLK,m#J,0
SJ is the fixed point resolution matrixSa is the Stabilizer of aCa is the Central Stabilizer (Ca ! Sa ! H)!a is a discrete group character of cCa
P ="
TST 2S"
T
U(m,J) =1�|H|
�
L�He�i(hK�hKL)�K(L)PLK,m�J,0
Cardy (1989)Sagnotti, Pradisi, Stanev (~1995)Huiszoon, Fuchs, Schellekens, Schweigert, Walcher (2000)
![Page 18: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Algebraic choices
Basic CFT (N=2 tensor(1), free fermions(2)...)
Chiral algebra extensionMay imply space-time symmetry (e.g. Susy: GSO projection).But this is optional!Reduces number of characters.
Modular Invariant Partition Function (MIPF)May imply bulk symmetry (e.g Susy), not respected by all boundaries.Defines the set of boundary states(Sagnotti-Pradisi-Stanev completeness condition)
Orientifold choice
(1) Dijkstra et. al.(2) Kiritsis, Lennek, Schellekens, to appear.
![Page 19: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric string theories
A surprisingly common misconception:``Absence of tachyons requires supersymmetry.”
![Page 20: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric string theories
A surprisingly common misconception:``Absence of tachyons requires supersymmetry.”
Counter example: O(16) x O(16) Heterotic string.
![Page 21: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric string theories
A surprisingly common misconception:``Absence of tachyons requires supersymmetry.”
Counter example: O(16) x O(16) Heterotic string.
Many examples in four dimensions, e.g.
Kawai, Tye, Lewellen, Lerche, Lüst, A.N.S, Kachru, Silverstein, Kumar, Shiu, Dienes, Blum, Angelantonj, Sagnotti, Blumenhagen, Font, .....
![Page 22: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric string theories
A surprisingly common misconception:``Absence of tachyons requires supersymmetry.”
Counter example: O(16) x O(16) Heterotic string.
Many examples in four dimensions, e.g.
Kawai, Tye, Lewellen, Lerche, Lüst, A.N.S, Kachru, Silverstein, Kumar, Shiu, Dienes, Blum, Angelantonj, Sagnotti, Blumenhagen, Font, .....
Once again we are in excellent company.
![Page 23: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric strings
Additional complications:
Tachyons: Closed sector, Open sector
Tadpoles: Separate equations for NS and R.
![Page 24: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Non-supersymmetric strings
Best imaginable outcome:
Exactly the standard model (open sector)
But even then, there will be plenty of further problems: tadpoles at genus 1, how to compute anything of interest without the help of supersymmetry, etc.
![Page 25: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Closed sector
Four ways of removing closed string tachyons:
Chiral algebra extension (non-susy) All characters non-supersymmetric, but tachyon-free.
Automorphism MIPF No tachyons in left-right pairing of characters.
Susy MIPF Non-supersymmetric CFT, but supersymmetric bulk. Allows boundaries that break supersymmetry.
Klein Bottle This introduces crosscap tadpoles. Requires boundaries with non-zero CP multiplicity.
![Page 26: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Closed sector
Chiral algebra extension (non-susy) Automorphism MIPF Susy MIPF Klein Bottle
Do these possibilities occur?
![Page 27: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Closed sector
Chiral algebra extension (non-susy) Automorphism MIPF Susy MIPF Klein Bottle
✖
✔ (44054 MIPFs)✔ (40261 MIPFs)✔ (186951 Orientifolds)
Do these possibilities occur?
![Page 28: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Tachyon-free closed strings
![Page 29: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Table 1 – continued from previous pageTensor Ext. <= 4000 MIPFs Oriented Unoriented
(1,2,2,10,10) 341 126 10180 22,4,0,0 198,0,0,0(1,2,2,6,22) 768 245 17468 20,0,0,0 73,0,0,0(1,2,4,4,10) 463 188 26508 4,0,0,0 340,0,0,0(1,2,4,6,6) 374 178 24364 20,0,0,0 370,26,0,0(1,4,4,4,4) 192 74 5292 68,0,0,0 241,14,0,0(2,2,2,3,18) 216 88 6092 130,66,0,0 0,0,0,0(2,2,2,4,10) 1133 557 223978 2264,520,0,0 6334,784,0,0(2,2,2,6,6) 1155 644 271198 1808,356,0,0 8988,1256,0,0(2,2,3,3,8) 63 26 816 0,0,0,0 4,0,0,0(2,2,4,4,4) 333 130 33804 72,48,0,0 635,40,0,0(3,3,3,3,3) 12 3 14 0,0,0,0 1,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,5,40) 36 10 162 0,12,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,7,16) 123 61 1160 15,16,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,8,13) 36 12 186 0,6,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,10,10) 78 29 1208 16,24,0,0 1,1,0,0(1,1,1,1,6,22) 108 35 892 0,8,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,2,4,10) 228 106 8888 16,24,0,0 39,3,0,0(1,1,1,2,6,6) 88 43 3652 0,0,0,0 0,16,0,0(1,1,1,4,4,4) 197 113 8534 430,95,0,0 395,78,0,0(1,1,2,2,2,10) 216 100 16972 408,148,0,0 676,0,0,0(1,1,2,2,4,4) 265 164 49008 160,120,0,0 396,172,0,0(1,2,2,2,2,4) 546 403 388155 2912,1583,0,387 4180,1564,0,0(2,2,2,2,2,2) 754 617 2112682 17680,12560,0,1942 105653,43836,6818,4202(1,1,1,1,1,2,10) 56 31 2984 28,52,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,4,4) 120 80 8668 270,200,26,0 97,86,0,0(1,1,1,1,2,2,4) 126 82 12832 0,84,32,0 27,50,4,0(1,1,1,2,2,2,2) 120 91 38228 0,448,0,186 0,416,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,4) 60 41 4426 218,190,95,0 9,11,8,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2) 35 24 2838 0,18,24,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) 289 202 161774 52058,17568,5359,0 41168,10292,3993,478
7
![Page 30: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Table 1 – continued from previous pageTensor Ext. <= 4000 MIPFs Oriented Unoriented
(1,2,2,10,10) 341 126 10180 22,4,0,0 198,0,0,0(1,2,2,6,22) 768 245 17468 20,0,0,0 73,0,0,0(1,2,4,4,10) 463 188 26508 4,0,0,0 340,0,0,0(1,2,4,6,6) 374 178 24364 20,0,0,0 370,26,0,0(1,4,4,4,4) 192 74 5292 68,0,0,0 241,14,0,0(2,2,2,3,18) 216 88 6092 130,66,0,0 0,0,0,0(2,2,2,4,10) 1133 557 223978 2264,520,0,0 6334,784,0,0(2,2,2,6,6) 1155 644 271198 1808,356,0,0 8988,1256,0,0(2,2,3,3,8) 63 26 816 0,0,0,0 4,0,0,0(2,2,4,4,4) 333 130 33804 72,48,0,0 635,40,0,0(3,3,3,3,3) 12 3 14 0,0,0,0 1,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,5,40) 36 10 162 0,12,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,7,16) 123 61 1160 15,16,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,8,13) 36 12 186 0,6,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,10,10) 78 29 1208 16,24,0,0 1,1,0,0(1,1,1,1,6,22) 108 35 892 0,8,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,2,4,10) 228 106 8888 16,24,0,0 39,3,0,0(1,1,1,2,6,6) 88 43 3652 0,0,0,0 0,16,0,0(1,1,1,4,4,4) 197 113 8534 430,95,0,0 395,78,0,0(1,1,2,2,2,10) 216 100 16972 408,148,0,0 676,0,0,0(1,1,2,2,4,4) 265 164 49008 160,120,0,0 396,172,0,0(1,2,2,2,2,4) 546 403 388155 2912,1583,0,387 4180,1564,0,0(2,2,2,2,2,2) 754 617 2112682 17680,12560,0,1942 105653,43836,6818,4202(1,1,1,1,1,2,10) 56 31 2984 28,52,0,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,4,4) 120 80 8668 270,200,26,0 97,86,0,0(1,1,1,1,2,2,4) 126 82 12832 0,84,32,0 27,50,4,0(1,1,1,2,2,2,2) 120 91 38228 0,448,0,186 0,416,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,4) 60 41 4426 218,190,95,0 9,11,8,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2) 35 24 2838 0,18,24,0 0,0,0,0(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) 289 202 161774 52058,17568,5359,0 41168,10292,3993,478
7
![Page 31: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
EXAMPLES OF TADPOLE AND TACHYON-FREE
SPECTRA
I. Orientifolds of tachyon-free closed strings
![Page 32: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
CFT 11111111, Extension 176, MIPF 35, orientifold 0
Gauge group Sp(4)Bosons: 2 × (S) (Symmetric Tensor)Fermions: None
CFT 11111111, Extension 176, MIPF 21, orientifold 0 Gauge group Sp(4)Bosons: NoneFermions: None
CFT 11111111, Extension 70, MIPF 56, orientifold 0
Gauge group Sp(4)Bosons: None (Symmetric Tensor)Fermions: 2 x (S)
![Page 33: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
8 x ( V ,V ) 6 x ( S ,0 ) 6 x ( 0 ,Ad) 8 x ( 0 ,S )
8 x ( V ,V ) 5 x ( S ,0 ) 5 x ( 0 ,Ad) 8 x ( 0 ,S )
CFT 11111111, Extension 67, MIPF 508, orientifold 0
Gauge group Sp(2) × U(1)
Fermions
Bosons
![Page 34: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
2 x ( V ,0 ,V ) chirality -2 2 x ( 0 ,V ,V ) chirality 2 2 x ( 0 ,V ,V*) chirality -2 6 x ( 0 ,0 ,A ) chirality -2 4 x ( V ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( S ,0 ,0 ) 6 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,Ad)
2 x ( V ,0 ,V ) 2 x ( A ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( V ,V ,0 ) 6 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,Ad) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,S )
Gauge group O(4) × U(1) × U(2)
CFT 1112410, Extension 157, MIPF 63, orientifold 0
Fermions
Bosons
![Page 35: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
EXAMPLES OF TADPOLE AND TACHYON-FREE
SPECTRA
II. Orientifolds of tachyonic closed strings, with tachyons projected out by the Klein bottle
![Page 36: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
3 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) chirality 3 3 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V*) chirality -3 3 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) chirality -3 3 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V*) chirality 3 1 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) chirality 1 1 x ( V ,0 ,V*,0 ) chirality -1 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V*,0 ) chirality 1 6 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) 6 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,Ad,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V*) 2 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S )
Gauge group U(1) × U(1) × U(4) × U(2) 3 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) 3 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V*) 3 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) 3 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V*) 1 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) 1 x ( V ,0 ,V*,0 ) 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V*,0 ) 6 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) 6 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 3 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,A ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,S ,0 ) 6 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S )
CFT 22266, Extension 710, MIPF 635, orientifold 6
![Page 37: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
chirality
Based on a sample of 72912 tadpole and tachyon-free spectra
![Page 38: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
FINDING THE SM
![Page 39: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Models
SM “branes”(3 or 4)
Hidden
Anything that cancels the tadpoles (not always needed)
Fully vector-like(not always present)
3 families + anything vector-like
Vector-like: mass allowed by SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)(Higgs, right-handed neutrino, gauginos, sparticles....)
![Page 40: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Search Criteria(*)
U(3) from a single brane
U(2) from a single brane
Quarks and leptons, Y from at most four branes
GCP ⊃ SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)
Chiral GCP fermions reduce to quarks, leptons (plus non-chiral particles)
Massless Y
Require only:
(*) Anastasopoulos et. al. (2006)
![Page 41: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Supersymmetric Gepner models
168 tensor combinations(Susy extension)5403 MIPFs (880 Hodge number pairs) 49322 Orientifolds
with Dijkstra, Huiszoon (2004/2005)
with Anastasopoulos, Dijkstra, Kiritsis (2005/2006)
19 Chiral types (“Madrid models”)18 with tadpole cancellation211000 non-chirally distinct spectra
19345 Chiral types1900 with tadpole cancellation
Two scans:
![Page 42: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Search for non-susy SM Configurations
Total number of tachyon-free boundary state combinations satisfying our criteria:
3456601
Bulk Susy 3389835 98.1%
Tachyon-free automorphism
66378 1.9%
Tachyon-freeKlein bottle projection
388 0.01%
Subdivided as follows
![Page 43: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
CFT 44716, Extension 124, MIPF 27, Orientifold 0N=1 Susy Bulk symmetry
Spectrum type 20088 (Not on ADKS list)
Gauge Group U(3) × U(2) × Sp(4) × U(1)
(broken by axion couplings to SU(3) × SU(2) × Sp(4) × U(1))
An example
![Page 44: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
3 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 3 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) chirality -2 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) chirality -3 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 1 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) chirality 1 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 3 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,A ,0 ) 4 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
3 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,S ,0 ) 4 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 )
2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
![Page 45: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
3 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 3 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) chirality -2 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) chirality -3 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 1 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) chirality 1 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 3 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,A ,0 ) 4 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
3 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,S ,0 ) 4 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 )
2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
![Page 46: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
3 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 3 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) chirality -2 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) chirality -3 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 1 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) chirality 1 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) chirality 1 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) chirality 3 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) chirality -1 3 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 2 x ( 0 ,0 ,A ,0 ) 4 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V*) 2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
3 x ( S ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,S ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,A ) 5 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,S ) 3 x ( V ,0 ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( V ,0 ,0 ,V ) 2 x ( 0 ,V ,0 ,V ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,V ,V ) 5 x ( V ,V ,0 ,0 ) 1 x ( 0 ,V ,V ,0 ) 2 x ( Ad,0 ,0 ,0 ) 2 x ( 0 ,Ad,0 ,0 ) 3 x ( 0 ,0 ,0 ,Ad) 1 x ( 0 ,0 ,S ,0 ) 4 x ( A ,0 ,0 ,0 ) 4 x ( 0 ,A ,0 ,0 )
2 x ( V ,V*,0 ,0 )
![Page 47: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
FINDING HIDDEN SECTORS
![Page 48: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
A tachyon-free, tadpole-free hidden sector could be found for 896 of the 3456601 SM configurations.
All of these have bulk susy.
“Statistically” 16 would be expected for the tachyon-free automorphism, 0 for tachyon-free Klein bottles.
All 896 appear to have a supersymmetric spectrum (exact boson fermion matching). They are probably supersymmetric models found a few years ago.
![Page 49: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
A tachyon-free, tadpole-free hidden sector could be found for 896 of the 3456601 SM configurations.
All of these have bulk susy.
“Statistically” 16 would be expected for the tachyon-free automorphism, 0 for tachyon-free Klein bottles.
All 896 appear to have a supersymmetric spectrum (exact boson fermion matching). They are probably supersymmetric models found a few years ago.Prelimin
ary
![Page 50: Non-supersymmetric Gepner Orientifoldst58/Presentations/Philadelphia.pdf · Quevedo, Cremades, Conlon, Verlinde, Wijnholt, Weigand, Gmeiner, Aldazabal, Andres, Font, Juknevich, Li,](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062907/5a9d6afb7f8b9abd058ce8c5/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Conclusions
Non-supersymmetric, tadpole and tachyon-free standard models must exist, but are still hidden in the noise.Supersymmetry is very persistent.