non rock alternative to shoreline jamie m. bartel, project ... presentations/july 29,...

10
Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Protection CEER 2014 July 29, 2014 Jamie M. Bartel, Project Manager, CDM Smith Scott Bartkowski, President, Living Shoreline Solutions Inc.

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Protection CEER 2014 July 29, 2014

Jamie M. Bartel, Project Manager, CDM Smith Scott Bartkowski, President, Living Shoreline Solutions Inc.

Page 2: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Project Overview • Project Client: USDA, Natural Resources

Conservation Service (NRCS) • Project Team: Living Shorelines Solutions

Inc. (LSSI) and CDM Smith • Purpose: Develop a viable, innovative

non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three sites within the Louisiana coastal zone.

• Challenges: – Unique shoreline field conditions – Previous solutions questionable in

terms of their limitations, or – No previous solutions

Description of Services: Provide site specific design for installation

Phase I Proposal (Technical Approach and Cost Estimate) Phase II Design (100%) Phase III Construction

** Evaluation criteria applied at each Phase to determine selection

Page 3: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Phase I: Technical Approach

• The technology proposed was Wave Attenuation Devices (WADs ®) developed exclusively by LSSI (U.S. Patent 6,186,702B1).

The WADs ® are a unique design developed to both reduce shoreline erosion and produce habitat in the most general terms and the design is flexible for various coastal situations. • The initial approach identified work scope items to support conceptual design

efforts to be further developed in Phase II, including: – Site visits, confirmation of field conditions, bathymetry – Wave, wave force analysis, water level analysis – Geotechnical and structural evaluation – Design evaluation, material quantity and cost estimates, quality review – Installation plan, QA/QC plan, H&S plan, O&M plan

Page 4: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Phase II: Engineering and Design • Iterative design approach- 75 days to

complete – Challenges to overcome:

• substrate conditions (soft peat mix) • wave attenuation • WAD height can be maintained 1.5 feet

above MHW-- for shoreline erosion reduction

• Wave loading analysis (CMS-Wave), water level, tidal range, bathymetry, wind statistics

– Water depths averaged 5-6 feet – Tidal range 0.35 – 1.70 feet – Average wind speed 35 miles, – Wave height 2.2-2.8 feet, fetch 9 – 19

miles – Wave period 2.6 – 3.7 seconds – Wave attenuation for WADs 90%

• Geotechnical Analysis, load bearing capacity and settlement

– Substrate, load bearing capacity = 400 psf

– WAD design, anticipated bearing pressure = 135 psf (13,500 lbs/unit)

– Anticipated consolidation settlement – 20 inches over 3-years

• Structural analysis – Factor of safety against overturning

moment 1.88

Page 5: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Phase III: Final Design and Construction

Based on available funding, going into Phase III, LSSI/CDM Smith utilized one site for demonstration at this time, Shark Island

Page 6: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Phase III: Construction (cont’d) • Manufacturing of the WAD forms – 16

built in 90 days • Transport forms to site • Pours were done daily and completed in

20 days • WADs were cured 3-5 days to reach

5000 psi • 30-day psi was 8,000 psi upon

deployment

Page 7: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Construction and Installation

CEER, July 2014

• WADs assembled on land • Loaded onto the excavator loaded barge • Transported to the site

Page 8: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Construction and Installation

• Installation - 6 days total

• 1 WAD installed every 4 minutes

• No initial settling of the units as predicted (2 feet was estimated)

CEER, July 2014

Page 9: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Final Array-As Installed

Design/Installation Advantages: • No barge canal required here to

transport WADs to the site • Material and installation costs

minimized by using local support • Quick assembly/installation

Other Benefits • Soil accretion along shoreline • Habitat creation

CEER, July 2014

Page 10: Non Rock Alternative to Shoreline Jamie M. Bartel, Project ... Presentations/July 29, Tuesday...non-rock alternative to shoreline protection for a 500-foot linear area at each of three

Questions?

CEER, July 2014

Thank you!