non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer · 2017-12-27 · o difficult to apply appliance (2...
TRANSCRIPT
Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (Surgical aspect)
Wichien Sirithanaphol, MD
Urologic division, Department of surgery
Faculty of medicine, Khon Kaen university
Outlines
• Clinical staging
• Radical cystectomy & urinary diversion
• Oncological Outcomes of Radical cystectomy
Gross hematuria
Imaging & cystoscopy
Bladder tumor
Flexible cystoscopy
Gross hematuria
Imaging & cystoscopy
Bladder tumor
Transurethral Resection of
Bladder Tumor; TUR-BT
Gross hematuria
Imaging & cystoscopy
Bladder tumor
Transurethral Resection of
Bladder Tumor; TUR-BT
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Clinical staging
Clinical staging
• Exam under anesthesia
• CT abdomen/pelvis, with IV contrast
• Chest imaging (X ray or CT with IV contrast)
Alternatives
o PET scan; equivocal staging exam and/or biopsy not feasible
o Bone scan; elevated ALP and/or pain complaint
o MRI imaging; CT contrast imaging can not be performed
o Non-palpable = T2a
o Induration = T2b
o Mass + mobile = T3a
o Invade adjacent organ = T4a
o Fixed to pelvic side wall = T4b
Bimanual palpation
T2a
T2b
T3a
T3b
T4a
CA bladder in diverticulum
1 2
3
4
CA bladder in Transplant kidney
Radical cystectomy
Indication
• Pathological confirm muscle invasive bladder cancer
• Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
– High risk of progression
– Lack of response to BCG treatment
– Transurethral uncontrollable NMIBC
Should not performed when
• Bladder is fixed to pelvic side wall
• Tumor is invading rectosigmoid colon
• Evidence of extensive periureteral disease
• LN metastases are unresectable
Pre-operation Incision
Position
Men Bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles
Women Bladder, uterus, anterior vaginal wall
Pelvic lymph node dissection
• Standard PLND
– Common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator
• Extended PLND
– + presacral region up to aortic bifurcation
• Super-extended PLND
– + up to inferior mesenteric region
Extended PLND
Relationship between the number of lymph nodes removed and the probability
of detecting lymph node metastasis
A recent meta-analysis has shown that an extended PLND increases the probability of detecting positive
nodes at radical cystectomy
Urinary diversion
Urinary diversion
Incontinent
urinary diversion Continent
urinary diversion
Orthotopic
Urinary diversion
(Neobladder) Cutaneous
ureterostomy
Conduit (Ileum, jejunum, colon)
Good renal function (GFR > 35-40)
Urinary diversion
Incontinent
urinary diversion
Cutaneous
ureterostomy
o No anastomosis o No metabolic complication o Short operative time
o High risk stomal stenosis o Difficult to apply appliance (2 stoma) o Replaced by PCN
Advantage Disadvantage
Urinary diversion
Incontinent
urinary diversion
Conduit
(Ileum)
o Quick & easy o Low early complication
o Abdominal stoma o Long term complication
Advantage Disadvantage
Bricker ureterointestinal anastomosis
Wallace ureterointestinal anastomosis
Urinary diversion
Continent
urinary diversion
Orthotopic
Urinary diversion
(Neobladder)
o No stoma (no cost of appliance) o Improve quality of life
o Longer operative time o Longer LOH
o Need self catheter
Advantage Disadvantage
Contraindication • Positive urethral margin • Compromised renal function • Complex urethral stricture
Should caution in • Prior pelvic radiation • Can not self catheter • Short life expectancy • Elderly
Serous-lined, extramural ileal neobladder (Ghoneim) Hautmann ileal neobladder
Studer pouch ileal neobladder Modified Camey II ileal neobladder
Kock ileal neobladder
Mainz ileocolonic neobladder Le Bag ileocolonic neobladder
Sigmoid (Reddy) neobladder
Perioperative complication
Complication of Ileal conduit
Conduit ischemia/gangrene
Wound dehiscence
Parastomal hernia (obstructed)
Parastomal hernia (obstructed)
Ureteroenteric anastomosis stricture
Contrast in conduit (Loopogram) : not seen left ureter left UE anastomosis obstruction
Oncological outcomes of Radical cystectomy
Large surgical series
5-yr disease specific survival rate pT2 = 70-81% pT3 = 40-52% pT4 = 16-44% N –ve = 63-80% N +ve = 21-35%
pT stage & N status = Strongest predictors of recurrence and survival following cystectomy
Radical cystectomy in Srinagarind Hospital 56 patients (2007-2016)
Age • 63 yr (min 33, max 83 yr, SD 11.7)
Gender • Male 54 cases (96%) • Female 2 cases (4%)
Presentation • Hematuria 56 cases (100%) • Obstructive uropathy 5 cases (9%)
Aim of Operation • Curative 48 cases (85%) • Palliative 7 cases (13%) • Salvage 1 cases (2%)
Urinary diversion • Ileal conduit 41 cases (73%) • Ileal neobladder 11 cases (20%) • Ureterostomy 3 cases (5%) • ESRD + bilateral nephrectomy 1 cases (2%)
Overall survival
Months
Survival & p-staging
Months
Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
Stage IV
Survival & T-stage
Months
T1-2
T3-4
p = 0.01
Survival & N-stage
Months
N0
N+
p = 0.009
Survival & Age
Months
<65 yr
>65 yr
Survival & GFR
Months
≥60
<60
p = 0.01
Survival & Pre-op albumin level
Months
≥3.6
<3.6
p = 0.02
Age
<65 yr 65-75 yr >=75 yr
Mean age
52.7 69.4 77.6
GFR < 60
(32/56 )
10/26
(38%)
15/21
(71%)
7/9
(77%)
pT3-4
(28/56)
10/26
(38%)
14/21
(66%)
4/9
(44%)
N+
(19/56)
5/26
(19.2%)
10/21
(47.6%)
4/9
(44.4%)
Death within 90 days
(5/56)
2/26
(7.7%)
1/21
(4.7%)
2/9
(22.2%)
Radical cystectomy in Srinagarind Hospital 56 patients (2007-2016)
Cystectomy vs Neoadjuvant CMT
• Answer
– Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Advantage
1. Systemic CMT is often better tolerated before surgery than after surgery
2. Micrometastatic will receive therapy when burden of disease is low
3. Potential to downstage bulky and locally advanced tumor
4. Allow clinician to access each individual response to therapy
Disadvantage
1. Delay in definitive local therapy for patient who do not response to CMT
Problems of neoadjuvant CMT in clinical practice
1. Symptomatic patient
• Hematuria, Irritative voiding symptoms
• Urinary tract obstruction
2. Insufficient renal function for Cisplatin based CMT
• GFR < 60
• In our series • 32/56 cases (57%) GFR < 60
• 5/56 (9%) obstructive uropathy (need PCN)
3. Patient compliance
4. Toxicity of systemic chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant CMT
Randomized Trials of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant CMT
2017
Neoadjuvant CMT
Neoadjuvant CMT
Neoadjuvant CMT
Cystectomy in elderly
Overall survival
cT2
Cancer specific survival
cT2
Multivariate analysis
Increasing age is significantly associated with worse survival for patients > 70 yr
Multivariate analysis
Cancer specific survival not able to demonstrate worse outcome for age > 70 yr However, age > 80 yr remains a significant predictor for CSS
Overall perioperative mortality and early mortality is increased in older patients (Incidence of perioperative mortality : < 70 yr = 1-6%, > 70 yr = 0-15%)
A syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve component (Comorbidities, physical function, nutrition, dependency, cognitive function, mood)
Eila Skinner at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Eila Skinner at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Conclusion
• Frailty does not directly relate to Age
• Formal frailty assessment can help us identify the patients at highest risk of surgical complication
• Ideal measure for radical cystectomy patients has not been identified yet
Curative Treatment for MIBC in Elderly patient
There is a need for Geriatrics assessments to select those patients that will benefit from curative treatment
Life expectancy Harm & benefit of curative treatment
Trimodal Therapy vs
Cystectomy
Trimodal Therapy
• Reasonable option in highly selected patient
• Ideal candidate – Good baseline bladder function
– Have a complete resection of all visible tumor endoscopically
– Have small solitary tumors with limited CIS
– No evidence of hydronephrosis
Trimodal Therapy
Major Prospective Trimodal Bladder Preservation Studies
2017
Trimodal Therapy
Trimodal Therapy
Thank You