nomination of candidates
DESCRIPTION
Nomination of Candidates. U.S. Constitution Article I, Sect. 4 The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof… Article I, Section 5 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Nomination of CandidatesNomination of Candidates U.S. Constitution Article I, Sect. 4
• The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof…
Article I, Section 5• Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and
qualifications of its own members…. Article II, Section 1
• Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives….
Nomination ProcessNomination Process
Nomination Process• No mention of nomination process in Constitution
because no parties in 1787-90
• But states responsible for elections
• States determine the nomination process with most (37) now using only primary elections
• But primaries were not introduced until 1903 with Progressive reforms and not widely used until after1968
Nominations continuedNominations continued
Competition for most offices has been handled through party caucuses• Grass roots effort (2166 caucuses in Iowa)• Some localities (e.g. CA) have nonpartisan
elections at local level• State and local offices vary--97,504 government
units in U.S.; >500,000 officials are elected!
Nomination of top State and Presidential candidates has proven more problematic
Early Nomination SolutionsEarly Nomination Solutions
Legislative caucus (State legislature and state members of U.S. House of Representatives) decided nominees for office• Violated separation of powers principle• Didn’t represent entire party, only those who had
succeeded in most recent elections• Citizen activists lacked say in the process
1824 election of John Quincy Adams over more popular Andrew Jackson struck death knell for legislative caucus
Early Nomination SolutionsEarly Nomination Solutions
Party Conventions• First used by anti-Masons in 1831• Popularity spread quickly for statewide offices
and Presidential hopefuls• Rival party factions objected but method
widespread until 20th century--especially until1968
Nomination ProcessNomination Process
Nomination Process• Types of primaries vary
– closed: (40 states) registered party members only
– open: voters on honor system; but must choose primary
– blanket: voters free to vote in any; U.S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional in 2000
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
Presidential hopefuls begin to plan for next election as soon as newly elected President has been inaugurated
Contest requires lots of money, planning and stamina...and intense pressure during Spring of the election year
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
Prior to 1968, candidate selection was:• bottom-up process orchestrated by political
parties• caucuses tested candidates’ strength within the
party• primary elections tested candidates’ electability
among the general population• Party conventions selected candidates
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
After 1968:• DNC initiated democratic reforms to
involve more people directly in the selection of party nominees
• most states adopted primaries, allowing voters to “choose” party nominee(s)
• convention delegates are often chosen after the primaries to reflect popular vote or in conjunction with vote for preferred candidate
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
After 1968:• result of reforms--greater emphasis on early
caucuses and primaries (e.g. Iowa and New Hampshire)
• other states advanced date of primaries to have a say in the outcome (California moved from June to March; 8 other states moved to earlier date in March--Super Tuesday)
• presidential marathon is time-consuming, expensive, exhausting
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
Democratic Convention
• 4337 delegates in 2000; 2169 to win
• Formula for delegate count includes population and electoral college vote
Republican Convention
• 2066 delegates; 1034 to win
• Formula for delegate count includes population and partisan voting record
NominatinNominating Candidates for g Candidates for PresidentPresident
Selection of Delegates• Party leaders• Party caucus (Iowa)• State presidential primary (41D, 44R)
Unintended Consequences• Amateur vs. professional priorities• Early calendar is decisive• Some proportional representation of delegates• More money needed in early stages
Political Campaigns continuedPolitical Campaigns continued
Good press relations help get news coverage of political events (free publicity)
Advertising costs average $400,000+ for first class commercial (Perot spent $50k)• Dole spent $45M of $62M on TV (72%)• need for name recognition• G.W. Bush spent $70M• Gore spent $40M• Forbes spent $37.5M in 96 and $20M in 2000
Federal Election Campaign ActFederal Election Campaign Act
• Passed in 1971 but Nixon spent $65M in 1972 to get re-elected; some went to jail
• If raise $5K (<=$250 ea) in 20 states, then govt. matches up to 1/2 spending limit
• Spending limit in 1996 – $30.9M + $6.2M = $37.1M in primary– $61.8M in main election (if Dem or Rep)– party can receive $12.4M for conventions
• G.W. Bush raised almost $70M; took no public money
Federal Election Campaign ActFederal Election Campaign Act
Contributions Limited for each election (primary and main)• Individuals may contribute $1,000 • Organizations may contribute $5,000 • no limit on expenses one may incur on behalf of
candidates• loophole with unrestricted donations to
national parties (soft money)
Congressional ElectionsCongressional Elections
• Influenced by Congressional district demographics– state legislatures determine districts– Supreme Court has changed position on
“racial redistricting”• Also influenced by:
– first-past-the-post process– voter preference for divided (weak) govt.
• Favors pluralist model of democracy